Measurement Metrics for Multi-Objective Optimizations

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 17 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 7

  • @MrRugbyferdinand
    @MrRugbyferdinand 3 года назад +2

    Very nice and intuitive explanation!👍
    Could you maybe specifiy why it is important that your points on the pareto front are well distributed and how that should help improving the performance of the model? Thanks in advance!

  • @niklaschief3774
    @niklaschief3774 3 года назад +2

    Video fast so stabil wie die Frisur ❤️

  • @mauip.7742
    @mauip.7742 3 года назад

    finally learnt something about the Measurement Metrics ! Ehre geht raus

  • @mohamedantar6865
    @mohamedantar6865 2 года назад +1

    Thanks you are awesome
    Plz explain the c-metric GD, IGD

  • @anata.one.1967
    @anata.one.1967 Год назад

    Can I average the hyper volume over a number of runs to get an statistically relevant performance metrics?

  • @htjadhav2611
    @htjadhav2611 2 года назад

    Please create video to calculate inverted generation distance for multi objective Optimisation

  • @Bencurlis
    @Bencurlis 3 года назад

    Great video!
    Imagine you give a final population size as input to a heuristic, let's say 50, and it produces less non-dominated solutions, let's say 30. How do you choose on which population you use the measure (whole population or non-dominated subset)? Obviously for some measure it should give the same value, e.g. hypervolume I guess, but surely that won't be the case in general.
    And how do you deal with measures that require to know the Pareto front like GD and IGD? Also, how many points should be taken on the Pareto front? Same size as the non-dominated population, or same size as the input population size, maybe much more?