@@jimflys2 WORD! I watched Loose Change and I cannot unsee all of the media blunders, slowed down footage of the buildings falling, the engineers and architects that publicly put their reputation on the line to dispel the narrative.
@@stevengallant6363 FACTS! Imagine how 3 buildings collapse and amongst all of the carnage, a simple passport of a “terrorist” survived in almost impeccable condition.
Bruh, I’m not going to argue the BS narrative that the federal government and media has infused your brain with. Respectfully, if you still believe it after all these years, even though enough holes have been poked in it, so that it resembles Swiss cheese, than you’re asleep at the wheel and there is nothing I can do or say to help you. I highly suggest you find the three part documentary Loose Change and absorb all of the actual facts debunking the horse crap narrative.
@@jopollmann No papers from inside of the exploded plane were found on the ground. That passport surviving an exploding airplane, then surviving the falling building is an absurd thing to even think possible. I will never be convinced that some shady stuff didn't happen that day. I don't claim to know exactly who did this or why, but the number of fishy things that happened day is immense.
Most probably Ginger will not read or reply to this and what I came here for was his excellent Trump coverage. Found this randomly and gave it a shot. Might as well comment to you alone. Yes the buildings were destroyed. They went straight down into themselves AND there were pieces of the buildings blasted sideways into neighbouring buildings. A simple collapse would not blast chunks sideways. No way each floor would give up like that so fast without help. I was into this for years and then eventually you have to leave it alone. It was an inside job and this video doesn't bring anything new to the table. Who exactly was behind it and why they did it, I don't know. Not that I don't care, because I do, it is just that you have to leave it alone at some point, for the most part.
Watching it live on TV, I never imagined that the towers would collapse. When they did, it was absolutely most surreal thing I've ever experienced in my life.
Well I was very well aware the buildings were going to collapse. I explained that in explicit detail in August of 2001. The report I gave was crystal clear, highly detailed, accurate, precise and clearly audible at more than 100 ft. That public pronouncement of it was in a place called Shepard Park in Stuart Florida.
All that jet fuel the jets were carrying was enough to make the metal melt. Especially after seeing how big those planes were. I knew after I saw the second plane hit I knew it was going to be bad and it was. I never cried so much until after that second plane hit.
" ...Bin Ladin was nervous about them coming after them" Actually, his men stated, "If you can provide us with evidence showing that he was responsible, we'll hand him over to you" ...that evidence was never produced.
In 1992, I was in 8th grade. We went to NYC for our 8th grade trip. We were scheduled to go to the WTC. The nun that I had canceled that part of the trip because she was worried about terrorism. She said in 10 years, they would be attacked. Seven months later, they were attacked. Nine years later, they would fall. I don’t know how she knew. I swear she had a vision. She’s still alive, too.
This is a FACT!! JET FUEL IS JP5 Kerosene. Doesn't get hot enough to melt steel. Steel columns where falling, turning to dust..This was well planned..along with building 7...
I was watching the live feed on TV in Australia with a VHS recorder running. I remember saying out loud ''That look's a lot like demolition explosives were set off ,'' when the buildings collapsed. Then there was the smaller building they just knew was going to fall. And shortly after, it did. There are thick steel beams in the wreckage sheared off at 45 to 65 degrees as if cut with demolition charges.
@@catmando7262you need to open your eyes and think again. It was clearly controlled demolition. New York could not be sacrificed for this event. So there was extensive planning as to how to accomplish the demolition without destroying the rest of New York. You must work for the government if you want to push the narrative
Plane was Nowhere near Strong enough For that and it Made out of aluminum like he Said the Building Was Way bigger than the plane. If it was stronger tho might’ve had that effect
It's really scary thinking about how many would've died had the original bombing attack in 1993 fully succeeded, as bad as 9/11 truly was the original attack would've been far worse had it went exactly how the attackers planned it.
Something like that technically could still happen. Just need some dedicated Terrorists, domestic or not with knowledge and a highly sophisticated plan and strategy, like finding weaknesses in security and taking advantage of that. They could go undetected. I mean materials to cause mass destruction is widely available. Its scary to think that an event worse than 9/11 can happen. Pray nothing like ever happens never again.
Things would have been far worse if the planes impacted closer to the base of the towers. They would trap far more people and the buildings would have collapsed much sooner.
Not just that, it’s scary to think how bad 9/11 could’ve been had the terrorist realized the towers could collapse. They would’ve hit the towers around the 40th floor. There was a clear path over the Marriott where they could’ve even hit the 30th floor
911 could happen again too. It would only require a decade plus for them to pull it offl. They would need two pilots to work their way up over a decade
For what its worth, & call it what you will, but... I once met a guy who used to work at the trade centers as a security guard down in the loading docks (and he had the receipts to prove it, like his old badge & i.d). He told me that about a year or so before the attacks, the "building management" had been required to install a "wind deflection & seismic detection system" throughout the building(s) -(evidently for insurance purposes?). Think about that! Something like that would require access to all the structural beams & joints throughout the building(s) to run said sensors, & string "wires" around all over the place, & justify any work that may potentially look like demolition "rigging"! Nobody that I have spoken to has ever really heard of such a "monitoring system", (at least not in sky scrapers) yet these installers of said system there, were allowed to waltz right on through, right past all the layers of metal detectors & security monitors with gang boxes of stuff, & tons of boxes full of "sensors" & "wires"! FOR SEVERAL WEEKS\MONTHS! -He didn't think much of it at the time, but after the attacks, he felt as though the whole "wind deflection monitoring system" story was all just a b.s. cover for what may have been a demolition crew that snuck right on past security, & operated right under everybody's noses completely unsuspected & undetected! -like a perfect disguise! (Which one would need, since those building(s) were "open for business" & occupied w people running around 24/7-365) Dude even said, that he never personally saw any of the gang boxes ever leave, and knew that most of them had been sporadically stored throughout the building(s) on many of the vacant floors long after the crews had wrapped up & left. He also said there were at least 3 different crews, which worked around the clock until their work there had been completed. -which, at the time around the clock hours wasn't too unusual, since work crews regularly needed access to areas that may have been heavily occupied during normal operating hours. & This was the kind of crew that could go in, open a bunch of walls, do whatever they needed to do, & have those walls all closed back up as if nothing had ever happened, -in just a matter of a few hours! Knowing what he told me has kept him awake every night ever since those attacks, because he felt as though he inadvertently helped play a part in allowing all that stuff to go through unchecked, (again, per the directive of "upper management"). & later, (aft the attacks) he felt as though it was as if the building(s) truly had been rigged w explosives based on the way the buildings came down; -which is when it all kinda dawned on him that he had probably been "played"; & those buildings really WERE most likely rigged! -And worst of all (for him) it had been his job to watch out for things like that! -yet he had been given specific orders to let those contractors & their "gear" slide right on by! -(If true, talk about one heck of a "heavy weight" for someone to bear!) I can't remember if I met this guy at the Hyatt Center in downtown Chicago (where a LOT of the companies from the twin towers were relocating to) back when that building was still being built; -or, if it was when I was working at the Sears Tower, but he was still an active duty security guard at the time, & still working security down on the loading docks. (We had lunch together a LOT & he even had stories from the failed bombings there, many years earlier!) -I really wish I could remember his name, but all i can remember is the stories since they were pretty chilling! -I'm sure the list of dock security officers from the towers has got to be pretty small if anyone were to pursue this tale. This was back somewhere between 2004 & 2007. (I did a lot of construction jobs in a lot of the high profile sky scrapers in downtown Chicago for the union back then between 2000 & 2010). Either way, you could tell this guy was super dead serious about what he was saying, & you could tell it was taking a heavy toll on him; he sure as heck didn't sound like he was playing around! -I still to this day, believe deep down in my soul, the majority of what he had to say... & It makes so much sense! It drives me crazy now every time I even think of those building(s) falling, & hear the eyewitness testimonies of explosions & bombs going off (not only as the planes hit, but as the floors collapsed). Add to that, Raytheon had been working on "remote control" systems for commercial airliners just months before the attacks.... who knows! Maybe those planes really were guided straight into gang box "targets" that had explosives (and\or thermite) in them, -some of which may have went off in a split second right as each plane was hitting, in order to "soften" their location in the building(s) so the planes could penetrate easier & deeper; -AND, as all that chaos up top was occuring, simultaneously, at that exact same split second in time, there were bombs in the basement levels going off, weakening the core(s). -Eyewitness testimonies tend to coincide with such a far fetched theory! (I.e: the firemen who were saying a huge section of wall exploded & blasted them across the room while they were down in the sub basement(s), or the firemen talking about being hit by huge slabs of marble flying across the room in the main lobbies) -Just an interesting lil tid bit of a "story" I thought I'd share, since this "theory" has NEVER been "publicly" mentioned. -Plus, some of the survivors also mentioned weird things happening inside the buildings during the moments right before the collapse(s) like: "it was as if the wiring behind the walls was shorting out & was burning its way across the walls & over doorways -followed by explosions..." (Det cord & shape charges?) Definitely one HECK of a fairy tale, or one heck of a "coincidence" that very FEW people have heard of, -let alone even bother to look into if they have! -Potentially "ground breaking" info if anybody could ever confirm ANY of it, -that's for sure!! (& most DEFINITELY some intense "food for thought!!!)
There was supposedly work going on in the elevator systems during the lead up to this as well. I immediately thought that this would be the perfect timing mechanism. Disable the brakng system on one of the express elevators that went the greatest number of floors, have it prestaged just below the false impact explosion site, and when all the precuts were accomplished by the thermite, the freefalling elevator could be a sliding contact switch for sequenced triggering of the explosives once it was released as it fell from top to bottom.
Romans 6:23 For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord. Come to Jesus Christ today Jesus Christ is only way to heaven Repent and follow him today seek his heart Jesus Christ can fill the emptiness he can fill the void Heaven and hell is real cone to the loving savior today Today is the day of salvation tomorrow might be to late come to the loving savior today John 3:16-21 16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. 17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. 18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. 21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God. Mark 1.15 15 And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel. 2 Peter 3:9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. Hebrews 11:6 6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him. Jesus
It's what happens in a controlled demolition! The planes had nothing to do with the collapse, that was just a excuse for people without the proper knowledge and understanding!
Basic knowledge of tungsten steel, concrete, and the amount of re-bar rods, would have obliterated the planes, the explosions we see on impact is the jet fuel exploding. Anyone with any knowledge of the materials that both the buildings were constructed of, and the aircraft…
It has been 2 decades and there are still people to this day that do not even know that more than two building collapsed on 9/11. Building 7, with more than 40 floors collapsed into its own as if it was demolished by control...
That's because it had been on fire for over 2 hrs, and the inside was completely gone at that point. The famous camera angle of it falling shows the only side with a wall still standing. Also, it's a much shorter building with a stable base. It wouldn't tip over to a side. Place a book flat on a table. Now tip it over.... see, it's to stable and short to tip. Same with tower 7. Do houses tip over when on fire, or do the collapse? That's because they are short buildings with big bases in comparison. They aren't going to tip over. Same for tower 7. It was very stable because it wasn't tall like to WTC's. It's only option was to collapse into itself. Why would it fall to the side and not collapse into itself?
@@DrSpoculusWhy would 7 be the only structure that experienced that? We know it was not due to fire, as fire wasn’t enough to bring down several buildings built both before and after 7. See: Empire State B25, Joelma Building, Warsaw Hub. There were several tall buildings around the plaza that were also struck with debris that did not experience a sudden simultaneous 90+ beam shearing (as explained in official reports). Not even 1 and 2 went down in unison together. Even buildings 4, 5, and 6 did not fully collapse despite taking on tons of debris.
@TheRestedOne debris... huge chunks of the towers came off during the impact. Watch the videos, see all that debris and parts of the towers being ejected for hundreds of yards? They landed somewhere.
@@DrSpoculus You're right, they landed on buildings 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, Merrill Lynch, Brady Building, Bankers Trust, American Express, Brookfield Place, and Verizon Building, just to name a few more. Somehow, only 1 building fully collapsed in the aftermath, and it wasn't even within the same plaza as buildings 3, 4, 5, and 6.
Any building can collapse. There’s no such thing as impossible. They said the same thing about the titanic. You know how that ended. Anything can be melted by fire . Just a matter of time.
Jet fuel burns wary hotter than iron can withstand.. i operate huge kilns daily that burn to 2,000+ degree F.. you’d be amazed at what that kinda heat can do after a few hours at that temp.. we ramp up 20-30degrees a hour until we reach 2,000 or so, then hold 2-6hr to burn ceramic pipe and flu (chimney liners). Even the stainless on the outside of the kiln around peepholes that aren’t in direct heat, or the door frame that’s hidden by glass fiber insulation, all deteriorates and burns up in a few years of 1 burn every other week or so.. never mind steel left inside the kiln itself.. it turns to ash. Anyway. This is only 2,000F. Jet fuel burns TWICE as hot.. fyi these are natural gas kilns, using high velocity burners.
I love how you keep directing this horrible event, I feel there are still a million questions that are still unanswered and 20 years from now we may find out new information about this day.
No.we won't. Nobody alive now will know the truth. Maybe in 80 years or so, but definitely not in 20 years.unless there's a whistleblower somewhere.bjt we haven't seen it yet. We're talking about hundreds of thousands of sealed documents
Building 7 wasn’t hit by a plane and collapsed the same way. Except the pentagon, the pentagon didn’t collapse just a hole in the side of the building.
Pentagon is a small building in terms of floors and world trade center buildings were literally 110,47 floor building No way you are comparing pentagon to twin towers and wtc 7
Talking about the Pentagon ,Yes a hole in the side of the building not even close to big enough for a plane to have hit and notice there was no engines or bodies or luggage or any part of the plane on the ground anywhere, cuz it was a bunker buster missile not a plane
A US fighter jet, fired a missile into the Pentagon. The first picture, shows a small hole. Half hour later, due to fire collasped to about 30 feet. 911 was America against America, to send America into Iraq.
@@AustrianPainter14 No it's called some jerk has to make this tragedy political. If you want to cite a president at the time, your friend Bush, who ignored the PDB's about an attack
Part of the core of the buildings actually stayed up for as long as 15 seconds, iirc the tallest core spire was like 50 stories up. From far away I get it looked like that, but from close up it definitely doesn't. There's also that footage of an extreme closeup on the impact zone of WTC 2 at the moment the columns give way. You literally see the supports begin to buckle and then give in, if you haven't seen it yet you should it's WILD.
its the whole multiple attacks at once that made those other airplane strikes significant at creating max fear. It was a crazy thing to watch on tv at the time
because 180 as-yet-unimmolated floors of office space and gear gets pulverized to a powder you could snort off Vesey Street in 11 seconds each tower, with nothing left larger than a fragment of a telephone keypad and the vast preponderance of human remains unidentifiably vaporized of course that doesn't strain the limits of credibility
Oh yes the twin towers were expected to fall. Hitting higher up on the structures was calculated to delay the collapse, giving people time and avenues for escape. Had they impacted the buildings far lower down like they had to do at the pentagon, the force of the 500 mph aircraft with all that extra weight above the damaged sections would have brought the towers down very much more quickly. That is why, the south tower, though hit after the north tower, collapsed first. The jet aircraft de-facto guided missile struck much lower than on the north structure. All that excess weight above the destroyed sections caused it to break first. Seems to me in 1997 I read something about hitting higher up to show mercy and allow people to escape and survive. In August 2001, in Shepard park in Stuart, Florida, there was a crisp clear detailed description of all that would happen. It described the impacts of the aircraft, the horrific noise, the flames and great billowing clouds of smoke, people jumping to their deaths, government jets sent aloft to save the day, but too late. It clearly stated the attacks with airplanes would cause the utter destruction of their targets. The airplanes would bring the buildings down. It was crystal clear and audible at 100 feet. It was not said in a whisper. That was August 2001 and came with a severe warning the attacks would come in a few weeks.
People on one of the planes made calls to loved ones, which was impossible! Explosive paint was installed during "elevator maintenance" in the towers. There were multiple floors of the towers that were empty. A plane wing couldn't slice a light pole, let alone a sky scraper
You’re gullible, who told you that? Some reels, TikTok, maybe RUclips shorts? Have you actually compared the video and know how controlled demolition works? If you compared physics explanations by reliable sources other than our government, you’d find it similar in visual except one thing every single one of you guys don’t see is that the towers collapse while the floors below the plane crashes were still in the collapse. That’s not controlled demolition technique. The more reasonable explanation is the upper affected floors started to collapse on top of the floor below it like a domino. With a design of center base steel and perimeter steel it can have a similar fall as a demolition but of course someone like you believe only demolition can cause towers to fall one type of way by that method only.
@@cd3949 and willp too? Yeah I encourage you, you targeted me even after admitting that you haven't researched properly. yeah go watch videos that will "research" for you. go get a book.
My dad was in tower one when the bomb went off and he said the smoke just rushed up there and when the bomb went off it knocked him to his feet and he felt the building away. He was waiting for the elevator to head down to the basement. It was a crazy day and he didn’t get home until 3am filled with smoke residue all over him. My uncle was in the building as well.
@@jamespage7998 the proof is in the report, its well known, theres footage of the reporter saying it fell while its in the background still standing just youtube it
@@jamespage7998 there is some truth to it, the bbc report came about 30 minutes before it actually happened. But I think it was pointed to be a reporting error due to bbc receiving their information from an incorrect reuters report. kinda like the 'game of whispers' you would play as a kid, also after the building was on fire for several hours it was being talked about it being a possibility that there was a danger of it collapsing by authorities.
@@jamespage7998 Jane Standley was the reporter. As noted by Ryy86, to stretch this into confirming a conspiracy is nonsense. Reports going down the chain from firefighters to media led to the misunderstanding of (paraphrased) "we're expecting a collapse any moment" to "it's already collapsed". Anyone who's played a game of Telephone knows this happens regularly. Nothing sinister at all.
Whether it was a false flag operation or a genuine terrorist attack, it was the perfect excuse for the US government to serve their interests in the Middle East.
Yep, "a new Pearl Harbor". Part of the Project for a new American Century. All in all, the so called leaders of the world are in cahoots with one another to manipulate events to manipulate agendas and ultimately it is about control and power.
@@peacefulscrimp5183 That was seriously damaged and the core support of the South West Corner failed. It twisted as it fell, with the south western half falling first. None of the 3 Towers fell as is in controlled demolitions. And almost 10 stories of out walls stood afterwards. That does not happen in controlled demolitions. They hardly fell into their footprints - the surrounding streets were decimated.
@@AustrianPainter14 People like you really want to feel special and like you're smarter than everyone else. You're neither of those things, but you want to feel like you are.
I still remember this day like it was yesterday. I was at the park with my mom, dad, uncle, aunt and cousins at the park right across the river from NYC. I remember vividly when the 1st plane flew over us b4 it hit the tower, we thought it was an accident.
The towers were imploded, not long after the rocket hit the first tower, and an unmanned plane hit the second tower buildings don’t just fall that are designed to withstand earthquakes and hurricanes
It's a tough sell that aluminum cans of fuel perfectly dropped the steel cored structures directly onto their footprints. Even the actual architect that designed the towers didn't buy it, especially since they were the first buildings to have extended reinforcing in case of an airplane flying into them.
Depressed Ginger should do more research and reading and less guesswork and speculation in these 9/11 vids. A lot of unanswered questions, over 3000 architects and engineers stating that the buildings didn't collapse in the reported manner, and thousands of victims who deserve answers and justice.
Physics, science and good common sense should tell you, as it does me... a 40+ year commercial electrician. That they could've dropped an AIRPORT on each of those buildings without them falling at those similar speeds, into their own footprint and in very similar ways. EVEN THOUGH the 3 buildings were hit in different ways, from different directions with vast differences in many critical parameters... It's BS.
Yeah, I was thinking the same thing. Even if jet fuel did melt the steel beams and weakened the overall structure, there’s absolutely no way the buildings would collapse like they did. They fell as if the fuel (assuming it did melt the structure) spread equally across the whole building and almost simultaneously at each of the floors. 9/11 is basically the Reichstag Fire of 21st century.
They hit up high on the towers because they didn't want firefighters to put out the fires too quickly. If they had realized what would happen, they might have hit them lower, which would have greatly increased loss of life. It could have been way worse.
Drosera 88, nice try with the hypothetical ism. Let me give you some facts. I had known about these attacks in details since 1997. They hit high up on the buildings. That was a calculation to delay the collapse of the buildings. It was a way of showing Mercy allowing time and avenues for escape. Do not bother to answer. I already know what you have to say. I was in on possibly what were some of the earliest planning stages of these attacks. I had been reporting it to people over a period of 4 years right up to and through the night of September the 10th 2001. Please do not answer.
@@John-rt7ou Planes didn't bring the towers down but controlled demolition did. Planes couldn't fly that fast at such a low altitude and would hit the building and fall off. No planes were seen on the first TV videos. They were added to the film later.
@@drosera88 Planes didn't bring the building down. They would have hit the building and just crumpled and fell to the ground and couldn't reach the speeds that were reported whilst flying at such a low altitude.
Here's what I often wondered, after tower 2 was hit and before it collapsed you could see molten steel burning on the corner of the bldg where it got hit. Then 3 months later the rubble pile still had burning molten steel. As far as I can guess is that the jet fuel burned almost instantaneously, so what the hell would cause molten steel 3 months later? The other thing is Larry Silverstein, who owned the bldgs, changed the insurance policy just prior to the attacks and he knew that wtc 7 was coming down before it collapsed into its own footprint. Explain that, please.
i always thought it was weird how the entire north tower fell. there was just that top little part of the building that was on fire, so i was surprised that that top 15% of the building could weaken the structure all the way down to the very bottom. im surprised that there wasnt atleast a few floors still standing there
I remember not believing the towers completely fell until I saw it with my own eyes. I was at work, and we were listening to Dan Rather on the radio. I was convinced he was exaggerating, as he had done many times previously.
Actually, the towers were engineered to withstand a hit by a 707, which was the largest passenger jet when they were designed. A 767 is much larger and carries more fuel. Still, I don't think anyone anticipated their coming down.
@GrandDuchessAniya lol @ Dan Blather reference ! Brian Williams probably scaled the buildings that day after repelling from a chopper and rescued 37 people. Those two....jeesh 🙄
Aluminum aircraft would not collapse concrete and steel structures, never happened before or after 9/11. The collapse had help from explosives. Also where are all the plane parts? Especially at the pentagon??
Remember steel doesn’t need to melt to have a failure. For example your engine block doesn’t need to melt for the engine to blow up as long as it got too hot and the metal weakened. Now imagine steel beams trying to hold up 20-30 floors after being weakened by a 80-150 (probably closer to 150) ton object slamming into it at almost 600mph and an raging inferno around (1500 degrees). They were gonna fail. The towers were gonna fall. Also if you did research you would have known that they did recovered plane parts including both black boxes from the PENTAGON. All the other parts were either destroyed or unrecognizable from all the debris. Like if you drop a skyscraper on a plane that already has been exploded and burned are you really gonna recovered or recognize anything from it? Especially when it is a “aluminum aircraft”.
engines "blowing up" have nothing to do with the block getting " hot and weak". They can "blow" in many ways...overheat and sieze (piston warping and getting stuck in the bore, piston rings basically welding themselves to the bore), rod or crank bearings spin and get starved for oil and then sieze. Throwing a rod (one of the only ways the block is usually damaged beyond repair.@Trentm129
I wonder if the towers would still have fallen if the planes were inbound to NYC, instead of outbound. Inbound planes would be holding far less jet fuel, and jet fuel was a big factor to how hot the steel got.
Conspiracy crowd aside, I think the answer would be, w/the North Tower at least, no. There was enough support below the impact floors to handle redistributing the load. The South Tower's lower impact point was more problematic. I also think many more would have survived w/far less smoke and flames.
Why was everything inside the buildings pulverized? The buildings were not completely incinerated. When buildings collapse elsewhere in the world (because of an earthquake or landslide), their contents aren't pulverized. Why did that happened here? And what's with that building that wasn't hit by anything and still collapsed? And what's with the former Israeli's prime minister just HAPPENING to be on the BBC studios that day so he could tell every one it was OBL who dunnit? And what's with all flights being grounded that day EXCEPT for an El Al flight back to Israel? And what's that about from that molten metal streaming down the impact area and pools of molten metal that were burning up until December? And what's with all those chained explosions that were witnessed by hundreds of people, just like in a controlled demolition? And what's with that 'plane' that crashed in Pennsylvania that was swollen as the ground 'liquefied' on impact and no bodies or plane parts were ever found - you know, that thing that never happens?
People like to ask the question of what would be the purpose of the Twin Towers today with all of the changes in the work place and what not. I never hear anybody saying that about the Empire State Building, which was here long before the Towers and still here long after.
The towers weren’t as solidly built as the terrorists thought they were. The damage was catastrophic, the terrorists were surprised the towers fell the way they did.
I dont think engineers ever imagined a 676 300k-400k lb airliner going 560mph with well over half the weight in jet fuel smacking the towers. The towers absorbed all of that ridiculous amount of energy. You can't tell me that couldn't compromise the integrity of those buildings
@@markrobinowitz8473 the Titanic sank because the cut corners and use cheaper metals that became brittle in colder waters. The twin towers weren't hit with an ice berg lol
Wikipedia is not a reputable source. It's a place to _find_ reputable sources. It's amazing that it's 20 years old now and people _still_ don't understand this.
Have you actually seen any post-collapse pix or videos? They spent months hauling beams and stuff away from the site. It didn't all turn into dust. You people, I swear to god.........
@@geraldeisenhower664Correct. It didn't all turn to dust. As a matter of fact, there was debris discovered as far out as several miles from the crash site. Which ... could only happen if the plane were to have lost its parts at high altitudes 🤔 I wonder how that happened? I mean... Let's ROLL!
@@FurbyParade226 planes have alot of energy,when the plane collides the palne might have parts still with the sam energy still depletling slowly,and the part gets slower and slower until it hits somr other place.
I've been a Welder all my life. I saw this happen on TV in the UK. I knew those towers where going to collapse. That high up with the wind blowing through turned those towers into giant bunsen burners. Floor struts made from aluminum holding the outer steel structure. Have you ever seen the picture of the sun shining through those buildings. They are mostly airspace. Stop with stupid uneducated conspiracy theories.
Lol, You could see the steel pouring out like lava and the fires burnt for more than 3 months. It will always be thermite to me. It is baffling how anyone could believe the official story. The wt7 building collapsed the same way and it didn't get hit by a plane. It took years for the official story to come out. This topic is exactly why the world is the way it is. You allow it to happen with your ignorance covered by your arrogance.
I watched a video where someone is filming the north tower after the first impact. A woman in the room expresses her doubt that the building can sustain that damage and expresses concern that the tower would collapse. I don't know if she was an engineer or what, but she called it early on.
Well. Good thing they werent supposed to "fall down". Because they didnt. They got hit by two planes. Then charges were set of in the building to help complete a controlled demolition
The fact that those buildings stayed up as long as they did is miraculous if you ask me. Think about the catastrophic damage of a commercial jet hitting a building. The jet fuel, the fires, all of it. I think a lot of people minimize that.
@@barbrice721 exactly. 100%. I think they were really a marvel of engineering. And think, another type of building may have toppled over instead of pancaked. That would have been horrible.
*That plane is just a alumunium coke can hitting a moving train comparing to it hitting that building with thousands of tons of steel beams * it's absurd to think a fire can bend steel, since that fire can never reach a temperature hot enough to bend steel. This is can be easily verified.
@@BeeEatingOrchid The Temperature is way high , its maybe 5X what the temperature was in the towers ... and in forgery the environment is closed. Please explain to me how kerosene (jet fuel) lamp keep burning forever without bending the lamp itself ? Explain to me why all those towers all around the world ,that was engulfed in fire , burned for more than 10 hours...no one of them had the steel structure damaged or bent?
@@QHawk7 sure thing. A. Kerosene lamps are not used to support thousands of times their own weight. B. Kerosene lamps feed cold air from below upwards, and the heat exits above. No part of the brass structure sits within or near above the flame, meaning the brass cannot reach the the same temperature as the flame. Steel begins to lose its strength at 300ºC, and rapidly loses its strength above 400ºC. The fires in the towers were somewhere between 800ºC to 1000ºC, more than enough to render the steel support utterly useless. The towers were contained spaces with plentiful supplies of oxygen, just like a blacksmith's forgery. Whilst a contained space is necessary for melting steel, it is not necessary for merely heating steel to the point where it is soft enough to hammer and reshape. I have no idea what you are trying to say in the rest of your comment, but you have demonstrated that you don't know what you're talking about.
Just a small clue for you my friend i called this event over a year before it happened so please just think what event happened eight years before this and what event happened eight years before that one.They are all connected.Thanks for your video my friend i watch them all.
@@loreeclary The first one is easy in 1993 at the world trade center now what happened eight years before that one and how many clues was given in the movie Back to the future because when marty first goes to meet doc he is at the twin pine malls yet when he returns the mall sign says lone pine mall but that is one of over a hundred in that series showing future and past events with another being when marty is trying to go home and reaches 88 mph two trails of flames from his wheels are left and as the camera zoom out you will see the number 9 sign to the left plus just look at the cinema he drives towards and notice the tower cinema design but again over a hundred more for you to see as i left the best clues out for you because all the JFK and Trump references bring us back to where it all started on November 22 1963.Hope this helps friend.
@@Ryy86 I did not have any internet at the time but there was still sources of truth available you only needed to put those pieces together and yes years after this i did see a few of Jones interviews.
Never has a skyscraper globally ever collapsed from fire. If you slow down the footage from the buildings falling and the explosions milliseconds from each level of the building falling. You can see the perfect circular explosions blowing out of the building with debris, dust, smoke, etc. UK scientists did a long documentary and it’s on Netflix. Engineers and architects all over America also dispute what this video is trying to say.
True. But the plane took out major supports for the upper floors. And also burning jet fuel is extremely hot. So those two factors combined caused the upper floors to collapse which started a domino effect were floor after floor collapsed on top of each other until there was nothing left
@@randomcub922 Jet fuel doesn’t keep the heated temperatures long enough to melt all of the steel beams. You can even see the “smoke” changing colors some minutes after the plane hit signifying it had significantly lost the intensity of the heat. In the early 1990s 1/3 of the pillars in the basement were blown out and the building didn’t so much as wobble. You’re sleeping at the wheel bruh.
@@SoulforSale Exactly and how did (was it BBC) prematurely announce Building 7 was falling/going to fall? There are so many slip ups and discrepancies throughout all of the mainstream media that day… all anyone has to do is watch all of Loose Change and you can’t unsee any of it.
@@randomcub922 The official report says that it was the fire from burning furniture that melt the steel, not the jet fuel. But lets say its true that fire from jet fuel, burning furniture or whatever can melt steel, it still won't be free fall when it collapse. Its just impossible unless all the column were failed at the same time.
Explain the nano thermite that was found in the ash, and also explain why there was no investigation of the crime scene.... all the remaining metal was shipped off asap to be disposed of without testing or anything. Also explain Barry Jennings and Building 7....
1; ground zero was investigated 2; nano thermite is formed by mixing red iron oxide & aluminium. both of which were present in the twin towers. the aluminium from the planes which melted. and the red iron oxide which was used in paint & plastics. aluminium vaporises at 2470 °C. which world have been possible to reach as the planes rubble was buried under masses of steel after they crashed and would have acted as a furnace . iron vaporises at 2,800 °C. which would also be possible if it was present on the planes 3; they did test the metal in a scrap yard in new jersey. as there is video footage of it being tested in 2002 4; the explosions heard by Barry Jennings was one of 5 things. the floors of the buildings hitting each other, the jumpers body's hitting the floor, the steel columns of the towers hitting the ground which continued for days, the molten aluminium from the planes reacting with water and exploding, or the pipes around the towers exploding from the pressure of the collapse 5; every floor of building seven was on fire. it also had a massive hole in the south side of it which was caused by the collapse of the north tower. steel weakens at 300 °C. the average office fire is 1100 °C and over. it was made even worse by the fact that it was on fire for 7 hours. it also didn't fall straight down. it fell backwards. it just looks like it fell into its own footprint but it actually damaged all the buildings around it.
there was no nano thermite that was found in the ash, that is what alex jones claimed and jones just makes stuff up for a career. Wdym there was no 'investigation'? and why would they need to test the rubble? Also who is barry jennings
Explain how arguably the most secure building on earth was hit by a plane and to this day we’ve only seen one grainy clip of a flash and an explosion. No wreckage. No seats. No bodies. No engines or landing gear
@@Trashman702 what do you mean no wreckage? there absolutely was all kind of debris and wreckage found, they even found the flight recorder. maybe because the plane hit one small portion of the building, and nobody just randomly records the pentagon 24/7? There are some videos taken in DC at the time where you can hear the plane in the background before switching to the distant smoke, and there actually is another angle from another checkpoint where you can actually see the plane for TWO frames and not just one like conspiracists like to highlight
Outside of amateur analysis of video and some press conferences of "pieces" that were never independently verified to be anything, there was no evidence of nanothermite. Also, the "crime scene" was there for almost 8 months, including 5 months where a public viewing platform of the cleanup was open.
9/11/2001 happened as a cover-up for Rumsfeld announcing the Pentagon audit found $2.3 TRILLION missing the day earlier. The purpose was to cover-up the $240billion covert financing of the Russian Ruble currency war that crashed the Soviet/USSR economy.
I really like your content and find it very interesting…. I have an idea for a video you might be able to research and put together especially since you seem to have a lot of access to information. I would find it interesting to know approximately what the death toll would have been had both towers not collapsed and they stood standing and the rescue operations would have been able to continue. Just a thought.
There is only one way out of Hell. Read Romans 10:9-10 & 13 & ask Him into your life, cleanse you from ALL unrighteousness. Make Him your Lord & your Savior. YOU will not go to Hell.
Good Lord. 🙄 WTC7, the one that was close enough to the towers to be mostly destroyed by WTC 1+2 debris, was fully evacuated, and collapsed hours later. There you go, now you know everything about it.
It was close to the towers and got hit with a lot of debris. It's not hard to find a map of the original complex. Building 7 included storage of fuel tanks and electric generators in case of emergency. They were stored on an upper floor: fuel + heavy weight. This is not that challenging to understand but the facts get obscured by CT pushers.
Amazing how a small section at the top of the towers can pulverize the completely undamaged lower part of the building and never loses its structural integrity, this small section of the tower is apparently invincible to damage and continues to pound down the rest of the tower with practically zero resistance from all the undamaged lower floors and the inner cores. Defies physics.
The best case conspiracy would be that bombs were in the tower as a security feature. In case of attack, if the tower would be in risk of toppling over, then someone made the call to take it down so that it would fall straight down. This would prevent massive lateral casualties.
3:40 bro watch any controlled demolition of similar buildings. the rest of the building is always brought down first and then the core is brought down, its done this way to provide stability to the collapse.
Also the physics explanation studies have all explained how the plane crashes caused a scenario similar to a demolition. So that point of yours has a fallacy of assuming only purposeful demolition can cause that single kind of fall. It’s really due to how the WTC were built with it’s perimeter and core beam build.
They did though. It was actually designed to withstand multiple plane impacts. An engineer I watched speaking on it compared it to taking a pencil and poking a screen door. The integrity of the screen was still there even after multiple holes. If that makes sense.
@@kelseywhitlatch173That time they accounted for 737 that was just coming into production. 767 did not start being used until 1981. 767 holds 4x more jet fuel. 737 has 7K gal capacity and 767 has 24K gal. Insane difference. It is enough to weaken the steel to create the domino effect that caused the collapse.
The only reason I can guess as to why you think the inner core structures remained after the collapses is if you were looking at one of the renderings based on the Nist or scientific American reports. Both had to remove the core structure in order to make thier models work. The core colloumn 52inch x 22 inch solid steel beams with 12inch corner flanges each enclosed in 5ft reinforced concrete. The only bit that remained was a 1 corner core column of the south tower 50 to 60 feet and a few of the connected smaller columns. The North tower there core was blasted completely apart to the foundation 6 stories below the surface. And to say no one expected the towers to fall is kinda ridiculous considering Larry Silverstien leveraged and borrowed everything he possibly could in order to get 1.5 billion insurance on the 2 towers, buildings he did not own and for 1 building he did bldg7 less than a month before the collapse. Larry silverstien Had also insisted on a Clause in the Lease that if the buildings "DESTROYED BY TERRORISM" HE WOULD THE BECOME THE OWNER OF THE LAND WITH OPTIONS TO REBUILD AS HE SAW FIT. A MONTH BEFORE THE COLLAPSE LARRY SLIVERSTIEN MET WITH THE ARCHITECTS AND DESIGNERS THE FIRST CONCEPT PROPOSALS FOR THE NEW TRADE CENTER BUILDING . A BUILDING HE COULD NOT POSSIBLY BUILD UNLESS TERRORISTS SPECIFICALLY SOMEHOW COMPLETELY DESTROYED THE EXISTING BUILDINGS. SIDE NOTE HE SUED THE INSURANCE UNDERWRITERS BECAUSE HE WANTED TO BE PAID 3 TIMES FOR HIS INSURANCE. A FRIENDLY JUDGE AWARDING HIM BILLIONS FOR THE 10S OF THOUSANDS HE HAD PAID TO THE PORT ATHORITY (HE NEVER PAID ADDITIONAL OVER 1 MILLION HE OWED THE PORT ATHOURITY INSTEAD SPENDING ABOUT THAT ON THE TERRORISTS DESTRUCTION INSURANCE. ONLY A LIAR OR AN IDIOT WOULD DENY/IGNORE THE EVIDENCE THAT PREPLANTED DEMOLITION CHARGES BROUGHT DOWN TOWERS 1,2, AND 7. THE PENTAGON ATTACK MAY HAVE RECIEVED LESS MEDIA ATTENTION, BUT WAS CRUCIAL IN IMPLEMENTING THE SUBSEQUENT MILITARY ACTIONS AND SO CALLED WAR ON TERROR. CITING THE PENTAGON ATTACK AS A DECLARATION OF WAR.
They were not supposed to fall because when they were designed in the 60-ties, Al Qaeda didn't exist, and nobody thought that there will be people mad enough intentionally to crash airliners into the buildings. The designers knew it was possible the towers to be hit, but in some kind of accident: a plane in distress who does not have enough fuel to reach a nearby airport. So the designers thought about a slow speed crash with very little or no jet fuel. On 9/11 the towers were hit by bigger and heavier planes, loaded with a lot of fuel, and were hit at very high speed. The kinetic energy of the impacts were at least 10 to 11 times higher than the energy of the impact the designers envisioned. And anyway the towers survived the both impacts. But the long fires after that, they were too much for the already weakened structure of the buildings, and that's why they fell.
I just don't think that the buildings are so weak they'd both fall into their own footprints after two aluminum planes could destroy two buildings designed to withstand this type of attack.
The towers had a particular design: a central core and an exterior skin. Each floor was suspended on ledges welded to the core and skin with a minimum of horizontal and vertical support beams. If too many ledges fail and a floor collapses, it puts more force on the ledges of the floor below. This resulted in the towers peeling as each floor drop pushed away the exterior skin. Nobody ever used the WTC tower design again in the decades before 911 because it was not a robust design.
@@MikeJackson690 9 months before 911 the towers were refitted with new elevator motors. The guys that installed them were normal workers, but who knows what may have been in those motors?? Maybe thermite charges!!!
The only such case in world history. But hey you're a crazy conspiracy theorist if you don't believe the official narrative, so just turn off your brain and don't think!
OBL and his boys must have planted demolition charges in WTC7 while they were doing the twin towers. Unfortunately for them, one of them dropped his passport while he was there. The rest is history.
The reason the towers collapsed is not what you think. We knew the towers were going to get hit and we let it happen. Thats a long conversation but to address this video, the reason they fell is because we tried to strengthen them in the areas where we knew they were going to be hit. It sounds a little bassakwards but heres why... If you are familiar with how a rocket stove works, we basically turned the towers into two gigantic rocket stoves. All they were missing was a big hole in the side and fuel. The airplanes provided both. The fires were contained by the upgrades, just as they were meant to do. The reinforcements contained the fire so it could burn hotter. The windows that were blown out in the lobby brought a steady source of air into the combustion chamber and the core allowed the exhaust gases to go up the center of the building like a chimney. That hot air reached the top and was sucked back down the elevator shafts into the basement where the whole cycle started again. This superheated the entire building. If you watch the video, moments before the building falls the antenna tower falls straight down into the center of the building. It just disappears. Because everything below it was already burned out. They found that tower all the way at the bottom of the tower. Theres a lot more but I can't type it all here.
I did consider internal conspiracy back in the day, not because one of them collapsed, but because both went down in the same fashion. Since both had been designed to survive an airplane, I assumed both falling was a stretch. However, as I later found out, they where designed with small planes in mind, not a jet. The force and the fuel amount changes everything. Jet fuel may not melt steal beams, but cracking from impact and then burning from the inside in a hellscape likely does utterly destroy the load capacity. Still, its difficult to shake the feeling. The perfect collapse imprint is shocking.
2nd "plane" was a missle with an airplane hologram projected over it. No plane parts fell off outside of Tower 2, it all went inside magically...one piece flew out the other side.
Okay.... I'll help out six weeks before blind 11 lucky Larry Silverstein took out a 3.2 billion insure policy on the towers. Building #7 right by the towers magically collapsed no planes no fires nothing. Find the right footage slowed down the towers just collapsed at a free fall with numerous flashes of what looked like explosions. Plenty of emergency personnel gave first hand accounts of the explosions many were silenced. Washington DC even in 2001 was one of the most heavily surveilled places in the world. Where's the footage of the "plane" hitting? Think only one video taken from a gas station was released. Yeah can't really see anything. Flight 93 same story plenty of first responders said they had no clue what had happened looked like some just dumped a bunch of debris in a field.
I like how we get sports and then randomly he’ll pop in with a “hey you guys know what was crazy? 9/11”
gotta keep us on our toes.
Well somebody had to say something. The FBI's focus is OJFK Simpson.
Bro
fr🤣
He’s Js like me I’m a Football player and I’ll go from Football to This on a Daily
23 years ago I said, " you bastards!" 23 years later I say the same thing, but to a different culprit. Ooooo!
@@jimflys2 WORD! I watched Loose Change and I cannot unsee all of the media blunders, slowed down footage of the buildings falling, the engineers and architects that publicly put their reputation on the line to dispel the narrative.
Right, then think back. Well our Government has been on crack since before the CIVIL War. And she Ain't been to rehab!!
Right
True and not true
I thought the same thing 23 years ago. In the words of Stone Cold Steve Austin "DTA: DON'T TRUST ANYBODY! 🖕🏻🖕🏻"
Imagine if the towers were made of the same Fire proof material That the high Jackers passport was made of.....
@@stevengallant6363 FACTS! Imagine how 3 buildings collapse and amongst all of the carnage, a simple passport of a “terrorist” survived in almost impeccable condition.
@@2AFARXDEUX i mean why not did you see the amount of paper etc that also flew away by the explosion
and also 4 were found but two of them not from the new york planes but in the one that the passengers brought down
Bruh, I’m not going to argue the BS narrative that the federal government and media has infused your brain with. Respectfully, if you still believe it after all these years, even though enough holes have been poked in it, so that it resembles Swiss cheese, than you’re asleep at the wheel and there is nothing I can do or say to help you. I highly suggest you find the three part documentary Loose Change and absorb all of the actual facts debunking the horse crap narrative.
@@jopollmann No papers from inside of the exploded plane were found on the ground. That passport surviving an exploding airplane, then surviving the falling building is an absurd thing to even think possible. I will never be convinced that some shady stuff didn't happen that day. I don't claim to know exactly who did this or why, but the number of fishy things that happened day is immense.
They didn't fall, they were destroyed. Once you understand the rest is basic physics.
Yeah, they were destroyed by falling. They were only damaged until they fell.
@@reignman30they were demolished
@@michaelwills1926 by a group of nationality-can-not-be-named art students
@@michaelwills1926but they did fall, you literally can't argue with that. How they fell or what caused it to fall is a different conversation.
Most probably Ginger will not read or reply to this and what I came here for was his excellent Trump coverage. Found this randomly and gave it a shot. Might as well comment to you alone. Yes the buildings were destroyed. They went straight down into themselves AND there were pieces of the buildings blasted sideways into neighbouring buildings. A simple collapse would not blast chunks sideways. No way each floor would give up like that so fast without help. I was into this for years and then eventually you have to leave it alone. It was an inside job and this video doesn't bring anything new to the table. Who exactly was behind it and why they did it, I don't know. Not that I don't care, because I do, it is just that you have to leave it alone at some point, for the most part.
Watching it live on TV, I never imagined that the towers would collapse. When they did, it was absolutely most surreal thing I've ever experienced in my life.
The Twin Towers were not supposed to fall on 9/11
Well I was very well aware the buildings were going to collapse. I explained that in explicit detail in August of 2001. The report I gave was crystal clear, highly detailed, accurate, precise and clearly audible at more than 100 ft. That public pronouncement of it was in a place called Shepard Park in Stuart Florida.
@@John-rt7ouWhat?
All that jet fuel the jets were carrying was enough to make the metal melt. Especially after seeing how big those planes were. I knew after I saw the second plane hit I knew it was going to be bad and it was. I never cried so much until after that second plane hit.
@@ameennasar2583 yeah bro wtf is this guy saying??
" ...Bin Ladin was nervous about them coming after them" Actually, his men stated, "If you can provide us with evidence showing that he was responsible, we'll hand him over to you" ...that evidence was never produced.
They were hit in the middle or top, they should not have "collapsed"
In 1992, I was in 8th grade. We went to NYC for our 8th grade trip. We were scheduled to go to the WTC. The nun that I had canceled that part of the trip because she was worried about terrorism. She said in 10 years, they would be attacked. Seven months later, they were attacked. Nine years later, they would fall. I don’t know how she knew. I swear she had a vision. She’s still alive, too.
The Twin Towers were not supposed to fall on 9/11
Just no
@@d.optional3381 Very true.
Fair enough if she was worried about terror it was a target
🧢🧢🧢
NY Firefighters Said they Heard Explosions before the Towers Fell . No way a Plane could do that amount of Damage
This is a FACT!! JET FUEL IS JP5 Kerosene. Doesn't get hot enough to melt steel. Steel columns where falling, turning to dust..This was well planned..along with building 7...
No but it could damage the steel beams enough for them to collapse, you conspiracy theorists don't know what you're talking about
@@kennethamend8557it sure as hell could weaken it 💀
I was watching the live feed on TV in Australia with a VHS recorder running. I remember saying out loud ''That look's a lot like demolition explosives were set off ,'' when the buildings collapsed. Then there was the smaller building they just knew was going to fall. And shortly after, it did. There are thick steel beams in the wreckage sheared off at 45 to 65 degrees as if cut with demolition charges.
That building was Building 7, or WTC 7. I remember it being reported on BBC.
The beams were cut diagonally by workers after the collapse to get rid of a hazard.
Tower 7 control demolition if one was controlled demolition they all were
The Twin Towers were not supposed to fall on 9/11
None were
100%
@@catmando7262you need to open your eyes and think again. It was clearly controlled demolition. New York could not be sacrificed for this event. So there was extensive planning as to how to accomplish the demolition without destroying the rest of New York. You must work for the government if you want to push the narrative
*Proceeds to only show footage of the north face of the WTC7*
When I was younger I used to think the plane that struck the buildings on 9/11 would’ve pushed the buildings forward like a domino effect.
That's what the people flying the planes thought would happen
When I was little little, I thought one plane flew between the towers and hit both at once with its wings. I didn’t understand the scale of things
Plane was Nowhere near Strong enough For that and it Made out of aluminum like he Said the Building Was Way bigger than the plane. If it was stronger tho might’ve had that effect
it sort of did. the south tower had a very visible sway
@@TNS17 the building material pretty much swallowed the Aluminum the Plane was made out of
It's really scary thinking about how many would've died had the original bombing attack in 1993 fully succeeded, as bad as 9/11 truly was the original attack would've been far worse had it went exactly how the attackers planned it.
Something like that technically could still happen. Just need some dedicated Terrorists, domestic or not with knowledge and a highly sophisticated plan and strategy, like finding weaknesses in security and taking advantage of that. They could go undetected. I mean materials to cause mass destruction is widely available. Its scary to think that an event worse than 9/11 can happen. Pray nothing like ever happens never again.
Things would have been far worse if the planes impacted closer to the base of the towers. They would trap far more people and the buildings would have collapsed much sooner.
Not just that, it’s scary to think how bad 9/11 could’ve been had the terrorist realized the towers could collapse. They would’ve hit the towers around the 40th floor. There was a clear path over the Marriott where they could’ve even hit the 30th floor
911 could happen again too. It would only require a decade plus for them to pull it offl. They would need two pilots to work their way up over a decade
30th floor would be below the tops of surrounding buildings, your talking about 300 feet from the ground.i suppose the could have done a nose dive.
For what its worth, & call it what you will, but... I once met a guy who used to work at the trade centers as a security guard down in the loading docks (and he had the receipts to prove it, like his old badge & i.d). He told me that about a year or so before the attacks, the "building management" had been required to install a "wind deflection & seismic detection system" throughout the building(s) -(evidently for insurance purposes?).
Think about that! Something like that would require access to all the structural beams & joints throughout the building(s) to run said sensors, & string "wires" around all over the place, & justify any work that may potentially look like demolition "rigging"!
Nobody that I have spoken to has ever really heard of such a "monitoring system", (at least not in sky scrapers) yet these installers of said system there, were allowed to waltz right on through, right past all the layers of metal detectors & security monitors with gang boxes of stuff, & tons of boxes full of "sensors" & "wires"! FOR SEVERAL WEEKS\MONTHS! -He didn't think much of it at the time, but after the attacks, he felt as though the whole "wind deflection monitoring system" story was all just a b.s. cover for what may have been a demolition crew that snuck right on past security, & operated right under everybody's noses completely unsuspected & undetected! -like a perfect disguise! (Which one would need, since those building(s) were "open for business" & occupied w people running around 24/7-365)
Dude even said, that he never personally saw any of the gang boxes ever leave, and knew that most of them had been sporadically stored throughout the building(s) on many of the vacant floors long after the crews had wrapped up & left. He also said there were at least 3 different crews, which worked around the clock until their work there had been completed. -which, at the time around the clock hours wasn't too unusual, since work crews regularly needed access to areas that may have been heavily occupied during normal operating hours. & This was the kind of crew that could go in, open a bunch of walls, do whatever they needed to do, & have those walls all closed back up as if nothing had ever happened, -in just a matter of a few hours!
Knowing what he told me has kept him awake every night ever since those attacks, because he felt as though he inadvertently helped play a part in allowing all that stuff to go through unchecked, (again, per the directive of "upper management"). & later, (aft the attacks) he felt as though it was as if the building(s) truly had been rigged w explosives based on the way the buildings came down; -which is when it all kinda dawned on him that he had probably been "played"; & those buildings really WERE most likely rigged! -And worst of all (for him) it had been his job to watch out for things like that! -yet he had been given specific orders to let those contractors & their "gear" slide right on by!
-(If true, talk about one heck of a "heavy weight" for someone to bear!)
I can't remember if I met this guy at the Hyatt Center in downtown Chicago (where a LOT of the companies from the twin towers were relocating to) back when that building was still being built; -or, if it was when I was working at the Sears Tower, but he was still an active duty security guard at the time, & still working security down on the loading docks. (We had lunch together a LOT & he even had stories from the failed bombings there, many years earlier!) -I really wish I could remember his name, but all i can remember is the stories since they were pretty chilling! -I'm sure the list of dock security officers from the towers has got to be pretty small if anyone were to pursue this tale. This was back somewhere between 2004 & 2007. (I did a lot of construction jobs in a lot of the high profile sky scrapers in downtown Chicago for the union back then between 2000 & 2010).
Either way, you could tell this guy was super dead serious about what he was saying, & you could tell it was taking a heavy toll on him; he sure as heck didn't sound like he was playing around! -I still to this day, believe deep down in my soul, the majority of what he had to say... & It makes so much sense! It drives me crazy now every time I even think of those building(s) falling, & hear the eyewitness testimonies of explosions & bombs going off (not only as the planes hit, but as the floors collapsed).
Add to that, Raytheon had been working on "remote control" systems for commercial airliners just months before the attacks.... who knows! Maybe those planes really were guided straight into gang box "targets" that had explosives (and\or thermite) in them, -some of which may have went off in a split second right as each plane was hitting, in order to "soften" their location in the building(s) so the planes could penetrate easier & deeper; -AND, as all that chaos up top was occuring, simultaneously, at that exact same split second in time, there were bombs in the basement levels going off, weakening the core(s). -Eyewitness testimonies tend to coincide with such a far fetched theory! (I.e: the firemen who were saying a huge section of wall exploded & blasted them across the room while they were down in the sub basement(s), or the firemen talking about being hit by huge slabs of marble flying across the room in the main lobbies)
-Just an interesting lil tid bit of a "story" I thought I'd share, since this "theory" has NEVER been "publicly" mentioned. -Plus, some of the survivors also mentioned weird things happening inside the buildings during the moments right before the collapse(s) like: "it was as if the wiring behind the walls was shorting out & was burning its way across the walls & over doorways -followed by explosions..." (Det cord & shape charges?)
Definitely one HECK of a fairy tale, or one heck of a "coincidence" that very FEW people have heard of, -let alone even bother to look into if they have!
-Potentially "ground breaking" info if anybody could ever confirm ANY of it, -that's for sure!! (& most DEFINITELY some intense "food for thought!!!)
This is very interesting I’ve never heard of any of that before
There was supposedly work going on in the elevator systems during the lead up to this as well. I immediately thought that this would be the perfect timing mechanism. Disable the brakng system on one of the express elevators that went the greatest number of floors, have it prestaged just below the false impact explosion site, and when all the precuts were accomplished by the thermite, the freefalling elevator could be a sliding contact switch for sequenced triggering of the explosives once it was released as it fell from top to bottom.
I've watched a documentary that mentions workers in the Towers till early hours ...Sound's true what he's saying...
Ohnrightbyou meet this guy and tells you all this earth shattering stuff and can’t remember his name or where you met him.What total bullshit.
Yeah I've heard similar too 😮
The way you described OBL's reaction like a kid horsing around then accidentally breaking something, and going "oh, no. Mom's gonna kill us..."
The Twin Towers were not supposed to fall on 9/11
Romans 6:23
For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.
Come to Jesus Christ today
Jesus Christ is only way to heaven
Repent and follow him today seek his heart Jesus Christ can fill the emptiness he can fill the void
Heaven and hell is real cone to the loving savior today
Today is the day of salvation tomorrow might be to late come to the loving savior today
John 3:16-21
16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. 17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. 18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. 21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God.
Mark 1.15
15 And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel.
2 Peter 3:9
The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
Hebrews 11:6
6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
Jesus
Why everyone highlighting this news, what happened, actually I'm not understand can you describe easily way
Nah...Was more as "Oh no, mommy just framed us"
Or like Japan after Pearl Harbor, oh crap, we just woke a sleeping giant.
It's what happens in a controlled demolition! The planes had nothing to do with the collapse, that was just a excuse for people without the proper knowledge and understanding!
LITERALLY WHAT I WAS GOING TO SAY .... people still believe that this crap about it's an "attack" 😂
Basic knowledge of tungsten steel, concrete, and the amount of re-bar rods, would have obliterated the planes, the explosions we see on impact is the jet fuel exploding. Anyone with any knowledge of the materials that both the buildings were constructed of, and the aircraft…
Thermite .
"Experts" will continue to perform mental gymnastics to explain this away for ages to come.
Ok Alex Jones
It has been 2 decades and there are still people to this day that do not even know that more than two building collapsed on 9/11. Building 7, with more than 40 floors collapsed into its own as if it was demolished by control...
That's because it had been on fire for over 2 hrs, and the inside was completely gone at that point. The famous camera angle of it falling shows the only side with a wall still standing.
Also, it's a much shorter building with a stable base. It wouldn't tip over to a side.
Place a book flat on a table. Now tip it over.... see, it's to stable and short to tip. Same with tower 7.
Do houses tip over when on fire, or do the collapse? That's because they are short buildings with big bases in comparison. They aren't going to tip over. Same for tower 7. It was very stable because it wasn't tall like to WTC's. It's only option was to collapse into itself.
Why would it fall to the side and not collapse into itself?
The hotel between the towers fell too
@@DrSpoculusWhy would 7 be the only structure that experienced that? We know it was not due to fire, as fire wasn’t enough to bring down several buildings built both before and after 7. See: Empire State B25, Joelma Building, Warsaw Hub.
There were several tall buildings around the plaza that were also struck with debris that did not experience a sudden simultaneous 90+ beam shearing (as explained in official reports). Not even 1 and 2 went down in unison together. Even buildings 4, 5, and 6 did not fully collapse despite taking on tons of debris.
@TheRestedOne debris... huge chunks of the towers came off during the impact. Watch the videos, see all that debris and parts of the towers being ejected for hundreds of yards? They landed somewhere.
@@DrSpoculus You're right, they landed on buildings 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, Merrill Lynch, Brady Building, Bankers Trust, American Express, Brookfield Place, and Verizon Building, just to name a few more. Somehow, only 1 building fully collapsed in the aftermath, and it wasn't even within the same plaza as buildings 3, 4, 5, and 6.
I had a teacher who told me that.
"Those towers should not have fallen."
Alot of people think they shouldn’t have but we shouldnt forget those metal cores literally MELTED from the heat and jet fuel
@A_Borden_History no... no they didn't..
Ignorant people are always full of “shouldn’t have, couldn’t have, impossible!”..
Any building can collapse. There’s no such thing as impossible. They said the same thing about the titanic. You know how that ended.
Anything can be melted by fire . Just a matter of time.
Jet fuel burns wary hotter than iron can withstand.. i operate huge kilns daily that burn to 2,000+ degree F.. you’d be amazed at what that kinda heat can do after a few hours at that temp.. we ramp up 20-30degrees a hour until we reach 2,000 or so, then hold 2-6hr to burn ceramic pipe and flu (chimney liners). Even the stainless on the outside of the kiln around peepholes that aren’t in direct heat, or the door frame that’s hidden by glass fiber insulation, all deteriorates and burns up in a few years of 1 burn every other week or so.. never mind steel left inside the kiln itself.. it turns to ash. Anyway. This is only 2,000F. Jet fuel burns TWICE as hot.. fyi these are natural gas kilns, using high velocity burners.
I love how you keep directing this horrible event, I feel there are still a million questions that are still unanswered and 20 years from now we may find out new information about this day.
No.we won't. Nobody alive now will know the truth. Maybe in 80 years or so, but definitely not in 20 years.unless there's a whistleblower somewhere.bjt we haven't seen it yet. We're talking about hundreds of thousands of sealed documents
Like what?
there's a follow up report that was done by Canada over thus, think it's on yt
Ha! You really think we'll be here for 20 years?
I mean, I'll be here in 20 years.
...but it will be with a newly glorified body;)
@cjnav7832 yeah, saying crazy stuff like that doesn't help the conspiracy stuff you propose.
Building 7 wasn’t hit by a plane and collapsed the same way. Except the pentagon, the pentagon didn’t collapse just a hole in the side of the building.
Pentagon is a small building in terms of floors and world trade center buildings were literally 110,47 floor building
No way you are comparing pentagon to twin towers and wtc 7
Talking about the Pentagon ,Yes a hole in the side of the building not even close to big enough for a plane to have hit and notice there was no engines or bodies or luggage or any part of the plane on the ground anywhere, cuz it was a bunker buster missile not a plane
A US fighter jet, fired a missile into the Pentagon. The first picture, shows a small hole. Half hour later, due to fire collasped to about 30 feet. 911 was America against America, to send America into Iraq.
Is there still people around who actually believe this ? How about 7 ?
Yes, they are called Biden voters.
@@AustrianPainter14 you are right.
The Twin Towers were not supposed to fall on September 11th.
@@AustrianPainter14 No it's called some jerk has to make this tragedy political. If you want to cite a president at the time, your friend Bush, who ignored the PDB's about an attack
biff5856
It’s true and you just proved it.
I get it but when the last tower falls. It looks like it literally disintegrates in front of our eyes.
Part of the core of the buildings actually stayed up for as long as 15 seconds, iirc the tallest core spire was like 50 stories up.
From far away I get it looked like that, but from close up it definitely doesn't. There's also that footage of an extreme closeup on the impact zone of WTC 2 at the moment the columns give way. You literally see the supports begin to buckle and then give in, if you haven't seen it yet you should it's WILD.
@@fuzzydunlop7928how can we see it? I can’t find anything like that on RUclips
@@nerad1994 search "wtc2 collapse Gary Pollard" or "riesman and naudet collapse footage"
@@fuzzydunlop7928Where is that to be found?
@@martygras378there’s actually a good video of it, but I can’t find it at the moment so if I find it I’ll link it
its the whole multiple attacks at once that made those other airplane strikes significant at creating max fear. It was a crazy thing to watch on tv at the time
The Twin Towers were not supposed to fall on September 11th.
because 180 as-yet-unimmolated floors of office space and gear gets pulverized to a powder you could snort off Vesey Street in 11 seconds each tower, with nothing left larger than a fragment of a telephone keypad and the vast preponderance of human remains unidentifiably vaporized
of course that doesn't strain the limits of credibility
Oh yes the twin towers were expected to fall. Hitting higher up on the structures was calculated to delay the collapse, giving people time and avenues for escape. Had they impacted the buildings far lower down like they had to do at the pentagon, the force of the 500 mph aircraft with all that extra weight above the damaged sections would have brought the towers down very much more quickly. That is why, the south tower, though hit after the north tower, collapsed first. The jet aircraft de-facto guided missile struck much lower than on the north structure. All that excess weight above the destroyed sections caused it to break first. Seems to me in 1997 I read something about hitting higher up to show mercy and allow people to escape and survive.
In August 2001, in Shepard park in Stuart, Florida, there was a crisp clear detailed description of all that would happen. It described the impacts of the aircraft, the horrific noise, the flames and great billowing clouds of smoke, people jumping to their deaths, government jets sent aloft to save the day, but too late. It clearly stated the attacks with airplanes would cause the utter destruction of their targets. The airplanes would bring the buildings down. It was crystal clear and audible at 100 feet. It was not said in a whisper. That was August 2001 and came with a severe warning the attacks would come in a few weeks.
Don't forget finding intact passports of the terrorists in the rubble......
@@joshuawiedenbeck6944 it's the Magic Bullet Theory of the 21st Century
@@johnshaw8228What was that, a vision, an audible voice or what ( in Florida) ? Who heard this ?
@@joshuawiedenbeck6944 You guys really are totally clueless how explosions and such work.
People on one of the planes made calls to loved ones, which was impossible! Explosive paint was installed during "elevator maintenance" in the towers. There were multiple floors of the towers that were empty. A plane wing couldn't slice a light pole, let alone a sky scraper
Controlled demolition is what is was, gullible people.
You’re gullible, who told you that? Some reels, TikTok, maybe RUclips shorts? Have you actually compared the video and know how controlled demolition works? If you compared physics explanations by reliable sources other than our government, you’d find it similar in visual except one thing every single one of you guys don’t see is that the towers collapse while the floors below the plane crashes were still in the collapse. That’s not controlled demolition technique. The more reasonable explanation is the upper affected floors started to collapse on top of the floor below it like a domino. With a design of center base steel and perimeter steel it can have a similar fall as a demolition but of course someone like you believe only demolition can cause towers to fall one type of way by that method only.
Alex Jones called.
He asked if you would kindly stop one -upping him.
He has already had one heck of a couple of weeks!!
If you choose to believe it.
@American_2 I'll listen to architects and engineers thoughts on this before you, some random dude in a RUclips comment section.
@@cd3949 and willp too? Yeah I encourage you, you targeted me even after admitting that you haven't researched properly. yeah go watch videos that will "research" for you. go get a book.
@@American_2 Why do you assume I haven't done any research?
My dad was in tower one when the bomb went off and he said the smoke just rushed up there and when the bomb went off it knocked him to his feet and he felt the building away. He was waiting for the elevator to head down to the basement. It was a crazy day and he didn’t get home until 3am filled with smoke residue all over him. My uncle was in the building as well.
9/11 - Did You Know: BBC Reports on Building 7.Before it fell
Proof?
@@jamespage7998 the proof is in the report, its well known, theres footage of the reporter saying it fell while its in the background still standing just youtube it
@@jamespage7998 there is some truth to it, the bbc report came about 30 minutes before it actually happened.
But I think it was pointed to be a reporting error due to bbc receiving their information from an incorrect reuters report.
kinda like the 'game of whispers' you would play as a kid, also after the building was on fire for several hours it was being talked about it being a possibility that there was a danger of it collapsing by authorities.
@@jamespage7998 Jane Standley was the reporter. As noted by Ryy86, to stretch this into confirming a conspiracy is nonsense. Reports going down the chain from firefighters to media led to the misunderstanding of (paraphrased) "we're expecting a collapse any moment" to "it's already collapsed".
Anyone who's played a game of Telephone knows this happens regularly. Nothing sinister at all.
Wasn't that predictable? People evacuated and noticed the fire tension, so won't everyone understand it's fate?
When I think of the twin towers, I always wonder how untouched Tower 7 fell
Lol "untouched"?
There was an unconfirmed rumor that the base of the buildings were setup to fall ahead of time, demolition style
Operation Northwoods is all anyone needs to know.
That's true not many people make the connection
Whether it was a false flag operation or a genuine terrorist attack, it was the perfect excuse for the US government to serve their interests in the Middle East.
The Twin Towers were not supposed to fall on September 11th.
🙄
Yep, "a new Pearl Harbor". Part of the Project for a new American Century. All in all, the so called leaders of the world are in cahoots with one another to manipulate events to manipulate agendas and ultimately it is about control and power.
I thought there would be a partial collapse , but not a 90-95% one.
The Twin Towers were not supposed to fall on September 11th.
What about building 7 ❓🤷❓
@@peacefulscrimp5183 Please do continue.
@@peacefulscrimp5183 That was seriously damaged and the core support of the South West Corner failed. It twisted as it fell, with the south western half falling first. None of the 3 Towers fell as is in controlled demolitions. And almost 10 stories of out walls stood afterwards. That does not happen in controlled demolitions. They hardly fell into their footprints - the surrounding streets were decimated.
@@markwilson4052 safe and effective 🤔 that must explain who's tags are on the van, and who is on the list 🤦
Do one video on Larry Silverstein
The normies aren’t ready for that
@@AustrianPainter14 People like you really want to feel special and like you're smarter than everyone else. You're neither of those things, but you want to feel like you are.
@@dr.jiIIaIicecooper2587Many people have spoken about Larry Silverstein. 🙄
Take your meds and be quiet.
@@VitZ9what will meds do
rainman6090
Is this your inner voice again?
I still remember this day like it was yesterday. I was at the park with my mom, dad, uncle, aunt and cousins at the park right across the river from NYC. I remember vividly when the 1st plane flew over us b4 it hit the tower, we thought it was an accident.
The towers were imploded, not long after the rocket hit the first tower, and an unmanned plane hit the second tower buildings don’t just fall that are designed to withstand earthquakes and hurricanes
It's a tough sell that aluminum cans of fuel perfectly dropped the steel cored structures directly onto their footprints.
Even the actual architect that designed the towers didn't buy it, especially since they were the first buildings to have extended reinforcing in case of an airplane flying into them.
The highjackers on flight 93 waited 46 mins before they highjacked the plane.
The plane was delayed at the gate. That's how the passengers knew it was a suicide mission. They got the info from cellular communications
The Twin Towers were not supposed to fall on September 11th.
@@biff5856 I know it was delayed but when it got in the air they waited another 46 mins before they highjacked the plane.
@@biff5856 Which is also already debunked, because cellphones wouldn't work in a plane in that era.
@@Sj430 Some have said perhaps Jarrah was having second thoughts. It is believed the "muscle" hijackers initiated the attack.
Depressed Ginger should do more research and reading and less guesswork and speculation in these 9/11 vids. A lot of unanswered questions, over 3000 architects and engineers stating that the buildings didn't collapse in the reported manner, and thousands of victims who deserve answers and justice.
Touche!
"3000 architects", ha ha ha. How many of them were unemployed deadbeats with a degree from Istanbul?
It's the "plane" (missile) that hit the Pentagon that convinced me it was an inside job
Who fired it?
@@MisterMcKinney Shrugs. We probably did it to ourselves. To spread fear. To increase security and surveillance on our citizens.
Yes
The dept. It hit was the finance dept, where the missing money was being investigated.
Easier to believe that your government is competent and evil rather than not just evil, but incompetent 😆
Physics, science and good common sense should tell you, as it does me... a 40+ year commercial electrician. That they could've dropped an AIRPORT on each of those buildings without them falling at those similar speeds, into their own footprint and in very similar ways. EVEN THOUGH the 3 buildings were hit in different ways, from different directions with vast differences in many critical parameters... It's BS.
Yeah, I was thinking the same thing. Even if jet fuel did melt the steel beams and weakened the overall structure, there’s absolutely no way the buildings would collapse like they did. They fell as if the fuel (assuming it did melt the structure) spread equally across the whole building and almost simultaneously at each of the floors.
9/11 is basically the Reichstag Fire of 21st century.
You’re right!
Kinetic energy!!!!! no were near enough to bring those towers straight down
They hit up high on the towers because they didn't want firefighters to put out the fires too quickly. If they had realized what would happen, they might have hit them lower, which would have greatly increased loss of life. It could have been way worse.
Drosera 88, nice try with the hypothetical ism. Let me give you some facts. I had known about these attacks in details since 1997. They hit high up on the buildings. That was a calculation to delay the collapse of the buildings. It was a way of showing Mercy allowing time and avenues for escape. Do not bother to answer. I already know what you have to say. I was in on possibly what were some of the earliest planning stages of these attacks. I had been reporting it to people over a period of 4 years right up to and through the night of September the 10th 2001. Please do not answer.
With all of the smaller skyscrapers surrounding the twin towers hitting the lower floors would have been impossible.
@@chriscurtis1578 I mean obviously they couldn't have hit ground level, but they still could have aimed lower depending on their approach.
@@John-rt7ou Planes didn't bring the towers down but controlled demolition did. Planes couldn't fly that fast at such a low altitude and would hit the building and fall off. No planes were seen on the first TV videos. They were added to the film later.
@@drosera88 Planes didn't bring the building down. They would have hit the building and just crumpled and fell to the ground and couldn't reach the speeds that were reported whilst flying at such a low altitude.
“Pull it.”
Preplanned.
It was an entirely pre planned demolition
@SoulforSale No, no it really wasn't 😂
@@mrivard81 sorry, I meant pre-planned controlled demolition with discharges set in place weeks or months in advance
@@mrivard81yes, it really was. Try to think for yourself
@@albatrosseagle8798im thinking for myself and nah, it really wasn’t
Here's what I often wondered, after tower 2 was hit and before it collapsed you could see molten steel burning on the corner of the bldg where it got hit. Then 3 months later the rubble pile still had burning molten steel. As far as I can guess is that the jet fuel burned almost instantaneously, so what the hell would cause molten steel 3 months later? The other thing is Larry Silverstein, who owned the bldgs, changed the insurance policy just prior to the attacks and he knew that wtc 7 was coming down before it collapsed into its own footprint. Explain that, please.
Thermite, and Lucky Larry was in on it. explained.
i always thought it was weird how the entire north tower fell. there was just that top little part of the building that was on fire, so i was surprised that that top 15% of the building could weaken the structure all the way down to the very bottom. im surprised that there wasnt atleast a few floors still standing there
Fire doesn't turn concrete and steel into powder. And you think some guy in a turbin hiding in a cave did that shit please
I remember not believing the towers completely fell until I saw it with my own eyes. I was at work, and we were listening to Dan Rather on the radio. I was convinced he was exaggerating, as he had done many times previously.
Planes were just WAY too big. It wouldn't have mattered but I hadn't thought of that.. Good idea.
Actually, the towers were engineered to withstand a hit by a 707, which was the largest passenger jet when they were designed. A 767 is much larger and carries more fuel. Still, I don't think anyone anticipated their coming down.
The Twin Towers were not supposed to fall on September 11th.
@GrandDuchessAniya lol @ Dan Blather reference ! Brian Williams probably scaled the buildings that day after repelling from a chopper and rescued 37 people. Those two....jeesh 🙄
@@GrandDuchessAniya727 actually
2 planes “took out” 3 skyscrapers. Nuff said.
Aluminum aircraft would not collapse concrete and steel structures, never happened before or after 9/11. The collapse had help from explosives. Also where are all the plane parts? Especially at the pentagon??
Remember steel doesn’t need to melt to have a failure. For example your engine block doesn’t need to melt for the engine to blow up as long as it got too hot and the metal weakened. Now imagine steel beams trying to hold up 20-30 floors after being weakened by a 80-150 (probably closer to 150) ton object slamming into it at almost 600mph and an raging inferno around (1500 degrees). They were gonna fail. The towers were gonna fall. Also if you did research you would have known that they did recovered plane parts including both black boxes from the PENTAGON. All the other parts were either destroyed or unrecognizable from all the debris. Like if you drop a skyscraper on a plane that already has been exploded and burned are you really gonna recovered or recognize anything from it? Especially when it is a “aluminum aircraft”.
engines "blowing up" have nothing to do with the block getting " hot and weak". They can "blow" in many ways...overheat and sieze (piston warping and getting stuck in the bore, piston rings basically welding themselves to the bore), rod or crank bearings spin and get starved for oil and then sieze. Throwing a rod (one of the only ways the block is usually damaged beyond repair.@Trentm129
I wonder if the towers would still have fallen if the planes were inbound to NYC, instead of outbound. Inbound planes would be holding far less jet fuel, and jet fuel was a big factor to how hot the steel got.
@@Smithstonediandoesn’t need to melt it to weaken it
@@JS-311 It was the implication. Now it's just semantics
Conspiracy crowd aside, I think the answer would be, w/the North Tower at least, no. There was enough support below the impact floors to handle redistributing the load. The South Tower's lower impact point was more problematic. I also think many more would have survived w/far less smoke and flames.
@@SmithstonedianAre you serious?
@@VitZ9 why so serious? 🫠🥶🤯
Controlled demolition. Building 7?
Why was everything inside the buildings pulverized? The buildings were not completely incinerated. When buildings collapse elsewhere in the world (because of an earthquake or landslide), their contents aren't pulverized. Why did that happened here? And what's with that building that wasn't hit by anything and still collapsed? And what's with the former Israeli's prime minister just HAPPENING to be on the BBC studios that day so he could tell every one it was OBL who dunnit? And what's with all flights being grounded that day EXCEPT for an El Al flight back to Israel? And what's that about from that molten metal streaming down the impact area and pools of molten metal that were burning up until December? And what's with all those chained explosions that were witnessed by hundreds of people, just like in a controlled demolition? And what's with that 'plane' that crashed in Pennsylvania that was swollen as the ground 'liquefied' on impact and no bodies or plane parts were ever found - you know, that thing that never happens?
People like to ask the question of what would be the purpose of the Twin Towers today with all of the changes in the work place and what not. I never hear anybody saying that about the Empire State Building, which was here long before the Towers and still here long after.
I'd tell them that the Twin Towers had mostly government and banking occupancy by 9/11.
They served their purpose of getting us a foot in the door to the middle east
because your government choose the targets well.
The Twin Towers were not supposed to fall on September 11th.
@@coreym162 Initially they did not attract many takers for office space. So the Port Authority moved in, plus other gov't agencies
The towers weren’t as solidly built as the terrorists thought they were. The damage was catastrophic, the terrorists were surprised the towers fell the way they did.
The Twin Towers were not supposed to fall on 9/11
the terrorists as the US government?
Everyone was surprised they fell the way they did.
The terrorist were dead on impact how would they be surprised?
@@StudioFocus-hh7dx there are a lot more than 19 terrorists in the world
I dont think engineers ever imagined a 676 300k-400k lb airliner going 560mph with well over half the weight in jet fuel smacking the towers. The towers absorbed all of that ridiculous amount of energy. You can't tell me that couldn't compromise the integrity of those buildings
Building 7 didn't need a plane crash to free-fall
The Twin Towers were not supposed to fall on 9/11
Engineers DID imagine that because they take that into account when designing buildings like that. They're called "dynamic loads"
@@gianmarcogreco9129 The Titanic was designed to be unsinkable, too. Some estimates turn out to be inaccurate.
@@markrobinowitz8473 the Titanic sank because the cut corners and use cheaper metals that became brittle in colder waters. The twin towers weren't hit with an ice berg lol
Investigate Mosad. Not Bin Laden.
Thank GOD Google uses a reputable source like Wikipedia to inform the masses about the truth... otherwise my stupid ass wouldn't know.
It's not the truth.
Wikipedia is not a reputable source. It's a place to _find_ reputable sources.
It's amazing that it's 20 years old now and people _still_ don't understand this.
Its a propaganda platform, not the truth
You 4 above clearly don’t speak sarcasm.
I could understand why it collapsed but the way they just turned into complete dust is what I find weird including Flight 93’s crash site
Exactly, have you watched Dr Judy Wood explaining direct energy?
Have you actually seen any post-collapse pix or videos? They spent months hauling beams and stuff away from the site. It didn't all turn into dust. You people, I swear to god.........
It didn’t turn to dust. They were cleaning up for months I wasn’t alive in 2001 and I know this. Use your brains
@@geraldeisenhower664Correct. It didn't all turn to dust. As a matter of fact, there was debris discovered as far out as several miles from the crash site. Which ... could only happen if the plane were to have lost its parts at high altitudes 🤔 I wonder how that happened? I mean... Let's ROLL!
@@FurbyParade226 planes have alot of energy,when the plane collides the palne might have parts still with the sam energy still depletling slowly,and the part gets slower and slower until it hits somr other place.
Steel will never melt or disintegrate from jet file and fire it's impossible...
you don't have to melt steel to forge a sword. Think about what that means.
You do realize that heating steel deforms and weakens it right? Look up a video of a forge
I've been a Welder all my life. I saw this happen on TV in the UK. I knew those towers where going to collapse. That high up with the wind blowing through turned those towers into giant bunsen burners. Floor struts made from aluminum holding the outer steel structure. Have you ever seen the picture of the sun shining through those buildings. They are mostly airspace. Stop with stupid uneducated conspiracy theories.
Lol, You could see the steel pouring out like lava and the fires burnt for more than 3 months. It will always be thermite to me. It is baffling how anyone could believe the official story. The wt7 building collapsed the same way and it didn't get hit by a plane. It took years for the official story to come out. This topic is exactly why the world is the way it is. You allow it to happen with your ignorance covered by your arrogance.
Came here looking for someone to say something this dumb. I was not disappointed.
I watched a video where someone is filming the north tower after the first impact. A woman in the room expresses her doubt that the building can sustain that damage and expresses concern that the tower would collapse. I don't know if she was an engineer or what, but she called it early on.
Well. Good thing they werent supposed to "fall down". Because they didnt. They got hit by two planes. Then charges were set of in the building to help complete a controlled demolition
The fact that those buildings stayed up as long as they did is miraculous if you ask me. Think about the catastrophic damage of a commercial jet hitting a building. The jet fuel, the fires, all of it. I think a lot of people minimize that.
That was my thoughts exactly. It had stood the time they tried to collapse it with the bomb in the parking garage.
@@barbrice721 exactly. 100%. I think they were really a marvel of engineering. And think, another type of building may have toppled over instead of pancaked. That would have been horrible.
@@misterrain837 Yep.
*That plane is just a alumunium coke can hitting a moving train comparing to it hitting that building with thousands of tons of steel beams *
it's absurd to think a fire can bend steel, since that fire can never reach a temperature hot enough to bend steel. This is can be easily verified.
Please explain to me how you think steel is forged without using fire.
@@BeeEatingOrchid The Temperature is way high , its maybe 5X what the temperature was in the towers ... and in forgery the environment is closed.
Please explain to me how kerosene (jet fuel) lamp keep burning forever without bending the lamp itself ?
Explain to me why all those towers all around the world ,that was engulfed in fire , burned for more than 10 hours...no one of them had the steel structure damaged or bent?
@@QHawk7 sure thing.
A. Kerosene lamps are not used to support thousands of times their own weight.
B. Kerosene lamps feed cold air from below upwards, and the heat exits above. No part of the brass structure sits within or near above the flame, meaning the brass cannot reach the the same temperature as the flame.
Steel begins to lose its strength at 300ºC, and rapidly loses its strength above 400ºC.
The fires in the towers were somewhere between 800ºC to 1000ºC, more than enough to render the steel support utterly useless.
The towers were contained spaces with plentiful supplies of oxygen, just like a blacksmith's forgery.
Whilst a contained space is necessary for melting steel, it is not necessary for merely heating steel to the point where it is soft enough to hammer and reshape.
I have no idea what you are trying to say in the rest of your comment, but you have demonstrated that you don't know what you're talking about.
It's cute that you can explain fuel lamps and steel strengths . Now explain good people and bad people ?@@BeeEatingOrchid
@@iamthenoiseopera well that's a weird request. No thank you. You explain them.
Building 7 also collapsed straight down. C'mon dude
We do not talk about it and simply pretend like it never existed 🙂
Yea this is ridiculous.
Pentagon. 2.3 trillion. No osama.
More answers in this comment than the video.
It's not that we don't think about the Pentagon and United Airlines Flight 93. It's that the World Trade Center collapse was so much more dramatic
The building were demolished...on purpose.
*"I think they thought..."* - that's the narrative of this video.
Just a small clue for you my friend i called this event over a year before it happened so please just think what event happened eight years before this and what event happened eight years before that one.They are all connected.Thanks for your video my friend i watch them all.
Could you just tell us what the events were, eight years after and before?
@@loreeclary The first one is easy in 1993 at the world trade center now what happened eight years before that one and how many clues was given in the movie Back to the future because when marty first goes to meet doc he is at the twin pine malls yet when he returns the mall sign says lone pine mall but that is one of over a hundred in that series showing future and past events with another being when marty is trying to go home and reaches 88 mph two trails of flames from his wheels are left and as the camera zoom out you will see the number 9 sign to the left plus just look at the cinema he drives towards and notice the tower cinema design but again over a hundred more for you to see as i left the best clues out for you because all the JFK and Trump references bring us back to where it all started on November 22 1963.Hope this helps friend.
yea, Alex Jones told me in June too
@@Ryy86 I did not have any internet at the time but there was still sources of truth available you only needed to put those pieces together and yes years after this i did see a few of Jones interviews.
Controlled demolition, just like Building 7.
You say nothing about the Thermite and its evidence of being staged at a corner of the building as a point of failure.
I thought those buildings were wired with explosives after the planes hit those buildings.
They were
@@MIDNITE14769weren’t*
Never has a skyscraper globally ever collapsed from fire. If you slow down the footage from the buildings falling and the explosions milliseconds from each level of the building falling. You can see the perfect circular explosions blowing out of the building with debris, dust, smoke, etc. UK scientists did a long documentary and it’s on Netflix. Engineers and architects all over America also dispute what this video is trying to say.
True. But the plane took out major supports for the upper floors. And also burning jet fuel is extremely hot. So those two factors combined caused the upper floors to collapse which started a domino effect were floor after floor collapsed on top of each other until there was nothing left
Building 7 wasn't hit by planes
@@randomcub922 Jet fuel doesn’t keep the heated temperatures long enough to melt all of the steel beams. You can even see the “smoke” changing colors some minutes after the plane hit signifying it had significantly lost the intensity of the heat. In the early 1990s 1/3 of the pillars in the basement were blown out and the building didn’t so much as wobble. You’re sleeping at the wheel bruh.
@@SoulforSale Exactly and how did (was it BBC) prematurely announce Building 7 was falling/going to fall? There are so many slip ups and discrepancies throughout all of the mainstream media that day… all anyone has to do is watch all of Loose Change and you can’t unsee any of it.
@@randomcub922 The official report says that it was the fire from burning furniture that melt the steel, not the jet fuel. But lets say its true that fire from jet fuel, burning furniture or whatever can melt steel, it still won't be free fall when it collapse. Its just impossible unless all the column were failed at the same time.
How did they watch the first plane hit on the news? I thought there was very limited footage of the first plane
it was a controlled demolition.
Explain the nano thermite that was found in the ash, and also explain why there was no investigation of the crime scene.... all the remaining metal was shipped off asap to be disposed of without testing or anything. Also explain Barry Jennings and Building 7....
1; ground zero was investigated
2; nano thermite is formed by mixing red iron oxide & aluminium. both of which were present in the twin towers. the aluminium from the planes which melted. and the red iron oxide which was used in paint & plastics. aluminium vaporises at 2470 °C. which world have been possible to reach as the planes rubble was buried under masses of steel after they crashed and would have acted as a furnace . iron vaporises at 2,800 °C. which would also be possible if it was present on the planes
3; they did test the metal in a scrap yard in new jersey. as there is video footage of it being tested in 2002
4; the explosions heard by Barry Jennings was one of 5 things. the floors of the buildings hitting each other, the jumpers body's hitting the floor, the steel columns of the towers hitting the ground which continued for days, the molten aluminium from the planes reacting with water and exploding, or the pipes around the towers exploding from the pressure of the collapse
5; every floor of building seven was on fire. it also had a massive hole in the south side of it which was caused by the collapse of the north tower. steel weakens at 300 °C. the average office fire is 1100 °C and over. it was made even worse by the fact that it was on fire for 7 hours. it also didn't fall straight down. it fell backwards. it just looks like it fell into its own footprint but it actually damaged all the buildings around it.
there was no nano thermite that was found in the ash, that is what alex jones claimed and jones just makes stuff up for a career. Wdym there was no 'investigation'? and why would they need to test the rubble? Also who is barry jennings
Explain how arguably the most secure building on earth was hit by a plane and to this day we’ve only seen one grainy clip of a flash and an explosion. No wreckage. No seats. No bodies. No engines or landing gear
@@Trashman702 what do you mean no wreckage? there absolutely was all kind of debris and wreckage found, they even found the flight recorder. maybe because the plane hit one small portion of the building, and nobody just randomly records the pentagon 24/7? There are some videos taken in DC at the time where you can hear the plane in the background before switching to the distant smoke, and there actually is another angle from another checkpoint where you can actually see the plane for TWO frames and not just one like conspiracists like to highlight
Outside of amateur analysis of video and some press conferences of "pieces" that were never independently verified to be anything, there was no evidence of nanothermite.
Also, the "crime scene" was there for almost 8 months, including 5 months where a public viewing platform of the cleanup was open.
9/11/2001 happened as a cover-up for Rumsfeld announcing the Pentagon audit found $2.3 TRILLION missing the day earlier.
The purpose was to cover-up the $240billion covert financing of the Russian Ruble currency war that crashed the Soviet/USSR economy.
Worldcom and Enron aswell
And a way for war.
PNAC
So it only took them a day to pull off 9/11?🤔And it would've been much easier if they just, you know, told Rumsfeld not to announce the audit.
That was only one thing, the gov (Bushs) planned this waaayyyyy in advance.
2.3=6
$240...=6
"Pat, Vanna, we would like to buy another number 6, please"
"AUDIT"...You are obviously clueless to the truth of all this
I really like your content and find it very interesting…. I have an idea for a video you might be able to research and put together especially since you seem to have a lot of access to information. I would find it interesting to know approximately what the death toll would have been had both towers not collapsed and they stood standing and the rescue operations would have been able to continue. Just a thought.
The u.s was "training" that day for How to defend against "planes hitting buildings"...
No coincidence
There were huge undergrond explosions seconds before each fell, we ignore that? We lost those videos and seismic data?
George Bush and Dick Cheney thank you for your service in continuing to promote the Government approved message!!
There is only one way out of Hell. Read Romans 10:9-10 & 13 & ask Him into your life, cleanse you from ALL unrighteousness. Make Him your Lord & your Savior. YOU will not go to Hell.
I'm curious about that other random building that went down, not close to the towers.
WTC7?
@@regularYT yes that one
@@nicholasciviero7289I am confused why you said: “random building”
Good Lord. 🙄
WTC7, the one that was close enough to the towers to be mostly destroyed by WTC 1+2 debris, was fully evacuated, and collapsed hours later.
There you go, now you know everything about it.
It was close to the towers and got hit with a lot of debris. It's not hard to find a map of the original complex.
Building 7 included storage of fuel tanks and electric generators in case of emergency. They were stored on an upper floor: fuel + heavy weight. This is not that challenging to understand but the facts get obscured by CT pushers.
Amazing how a small section at the top of the towers can pulverize the completely undamaged lower part of the building and never loses its structural integrity, this small section of the tower is apparently invincible to damage and continues to pound down the rest of the tower with practically zero resistance from all the undamaged lower floors and the inner cores. Defies physics.
The best case conspiracy would be that bombs were in the tower as a security feature. In case of attack, if the tower would be in risk of toppling over, then someone made the call to take it down so that it would fall straight down. This would prevent massive lateral casualties.
I guess ill never be able to convince some people an airliner can't fly mach 1 at sea level
It’s beyond their comprehension
@@BrianWaller-qe7gr I heard that before, things never added up.
3:40 bro watch any controlled demolition of similar buildings. the rest of the building is always brought down first and then the core is brought down, its done this way to provide stability to the collapse.
Also the physics explanation studies have all explained how the plane crashes caused a scenario similar to a demolition. So that point of yours has a fallacy of assuming only purposeful demolition can cause that single kind of fall. It’s really due to how the WTC were built with it’s perimeter and core beam build.
Well the architects didn't really expect a modern commercial jet flying into the towers at full speed
They did though. It was actually designed to withstand multiple plane impacts. An engineer I watched speaking on it compared it to taking a pencil and poking a screen door. The integrity of the screen was still there even after multiple holes. If that makes sense.
@@kelseywhitlatch173much smaller planes though
@@michawee The towers were designed to take a hit from a 747, it was the fire that did them in.
@@fantabuloussnuffaluffagus 707 actually. Taken from the wtc Wikipedia page
@@kelseywhitlatch173That time they accounted for 737 that was just coming into production. 767 did not start being used until 1981. 767 holds 4x more jet fuel. 737 has 7K gal capacity and 767 has 24K gal. Insane difference. It is enough to weaken the steel to create the domino effect that caused the collapse.
The only reason I can guess as to why you think the inner core structures remained after the collapses is if you were looking at one of the renderings based on the Nist or scientific American reports. Both had to remove the core structure in order to make thier models work. The core colloumn 52inch x 22 inch solid steel beams with 12inch corner flanges each enclosed in 5ft reinforced concrete. The only bit that remained was a 1 corner core column of the south tower 50 to 60 feet and a few of the connected smaller columns. The North tower there core was blasted completely apart to the foundation 6 stories below the surface.
And to say no one expected the towers to fall is kinda ridiculous considering Larry Silverstien leveraged and borrowed everything he possibly could in order to get 1.5 billion insurance on the 2 towers, buildings he did not own and for 1 building he did bldg7 less than a month before the collapse. Larry silverstien
Had also insisted on a Clause in the Lease that if the buildings "DESTROYED BY TERRORISM" HE WOULD THE BECOME THE OWNER OF THE LAND WITH OPTIONS TO REBUILD AS HE SAW FIT.
A MONTH BEFORE THE COLLAPSE LARRY SLIVERSTIEN MET WITH THE ARCHITECTS AND DESIGNERS THE FIRST CONCEPT PROPOSALS FOR THE NEW TRADE CENTER BUILDING . A BUILDING HE COULD NOT POSSIBLY BUILD UNLESS TERRORISTS SPECIFICALLY SOMEHOW COMPLETELY DESTROYED THE EXISTING BUILDINGS.
SIDE NOTE HE SUED THE INSURANCE UNDERWRITERS BECAUSE HE WANTED TO BE PAID 3 TIMES FOR HIS INSURANCE. A FRIENDLY JUDGE AWARDING HIM BILLIONS FOR THE 10S OF THOUSANDS HE HAD PAID TO THE PORT ATHORITY (HE NEVER PAID ADDITIONAL OVER 1 MILLION HE OWED THE PORT ATHOURITY INSTEAD SPENDING ABOUT THAT ON THE TERRORISTS DESTRUCTION INSURANCE.
ONLY A LIAR OR AN IDIOT WOULD DENY/IGNORE THE EVIDENCE THAT PREPLANTED DEMOLITION CHARGES BROUGHT DOWN TOWERS 1,2, AND 7.
THE PENTAGON ATTACK MAY HAVE RECIEVED LESS MEDIA ATTENTION, BUT WAS CRUCIAL IN IMPLEMENTING THE SUBSEQUENT MILITARY ACTIONS AND SO CALLED WAR ON TERROR. CITING THE PENTAGON ATTACK AS A DECLARATION OF WAR.
There were explosions.. Why did that other building fall straight down that was never hit nor did it have ANY damage?
They were not supposed to fall because when they were designed in the 60-ties, Al Qaeda didn't exist, and nobody thought that there will be people mad enough intentionally to crash airliners into the buildings.
The designers knew it was possible the towers to be hit, but in some kind of accident: a plane in distress who does not have enough fuel to reach a nearby airport. So the designers thought about a slow speed crash with very little or no jet fuel.
On 9/11 the towers were hit by bigger and heavier planes, loaded with a lot of fuel, and were hit at very high speed.
The kinetic energy of the impacts were at least 10 to 11 times higher than the energy of the impact the designers envisioned.
And anyway the towers survived the both impacts.
But the long fires after that, they were too much for the already weakened structure of the buildings, and that's why they fell.
I just don't think that the buildings are so weak they'd both fall into their own footprints after two aluminum planes could destroy two buildings designed to withstand this type of attack.
The towers had a particular design: a central core and an exterior skin. Each floor was suspended on ledges welded to the core and skin with a minimum of horizontal and vertical support beams. If too many ledges fail and a floor collapses, it puts more force on the ledges of the floor below. This resulted in the towers peeling as each floor drop pushed away the exterior skin.
Nobody ever used the WTC tower design again in the decades before 911 because it was not a robust design.
The Twin Towers were not supposed to fall on 9/11
We're not talking about aluminium like in Coke cans here you know.
What about building 7 that was brought down by an office fire that afternoon??? damn office fires!!!
Magic...
@@MikeJackson690 9 months before 911 the towers were refitted with new elevator motors. The guys that installed them were normal workers, but who knows what may have been in those motors?? Maybe thermite charges!!!
The only such case in world history. But hey you're a crazy conspiracy theorist if you don't believe the official narrative, so just turn off your brain and don't think!
OBL and his boys must have planted demolition charges in WTC7 while they were doing the twin towers.
Unfortunately for them, one of them dropped his passport while he was there. The rest is history.
The reason the towers collapsed is not what you think.
We knew the towers were going to get hit and we let it happen.
Thats a long conversation but to address this video, the reason they fell is because we tried to strengthen them in the areas where we knew they were going to be hit.
It sounds a little bassakwards but heres why...
If you are familiar with how a rocket stove works, we basically turned the towers into two gigantic rocket stoves.
All they were missing was a big hole in the side and fuel.
The airplanes provided both.
The fires were contained by the upgrades, just as they were meant to do.
The reinforcements contained the fire so it could burn hotter. The windows that were blown out in the lobby brought a steady source of air into the combustion chamber and the core allowed the exhaust gases to go up the center of the building like a chimney.
That hot air reached the top and was sucked back down the elevator shafts into the basement where the whole cycle started again.
This superheated the entire building.
If you watch the video, moments before the building falls the antenna tower falls straight down into the center of the building.
It just disappears.
Because everything below it was already burned out. They found that tower all the way at the bottom of the tower.
Theres a lot more but I can't type it all here.
Dr. Judy Woods has an outstanding video on this subject. "Where Did The Towers Go".
Read “Where Did the Towers Go” by Dr Judy Wood
I wouldn't use that to wipe my a$$.
@@timshea4279 then I feel sorry for you. Keep living in lala land.
WTC 7 . End of argument
It was an obvious controlled demolition.
Oh my God, why do you still believe- nevermind
@@ElmoreStreams prolly still believes Kennedy death shot came from the rear lol.
What about the planes full of people? Was it a failed controlled demolition or a attack?
Strange definition of "controlled".
Jeez, are there still people around with no knowledge of basic physics?...
Pentagon got hit we’re all the military financial records were held one a coincidence and the titanium engines disintegrated Mayeye
I did consider internal conspiracy back in the day, not because one of them collapsed, but because both went down in the same fashion. Since both had been designed to survive an airplane, I assumed both falling was a stretch. However, as I later found out, they where designed with small planes in mind, not a jet. The force and the fuel amount changes everything. Jet fuel may not melt steal beams, but cracking from impact and then burning from the inside in a hellscape likely does utterly destroy the load capacity. Still, its difficult to shake the feeling. The perfect collapse imprint is shocking.
2nd "plane" was a missle with an airplane hologram projected over it. No plane parts fell off outside of Tower 2, it all went inside magically...one piece flew out the other side.
If you’re gonna be a conspiracy theorist at least say something reasonable
Okay.... I'll help out six weeks before blind 11 lucky Larry Silverstein took out a 3.2 billion insure policy on the towers. Building #7 right by the towers magically collapsed no planes no fires nothing. Find the right footage slowed down the towers just collapsed at a free fall with numerous flashes of what looked like explosions. Plenty of emergency personnel gave first hand accounts of the explosions many were silenced. Washington DC even in 2001 was one of the most heavily surveilled places in the world. Where's the footage of the "plane" hitting? Think only one video taken from a gas station was released. Yeah can't really see anything. Flight 93 same story plenty of first responders said they had no clue what had happened looked like some just dumped a bunch of debris in a field.
Peter Pan can
@@conpop6924 That's where the problem is, conspiracy theorists can't think or say anything reasonable by nature.
How do they know it wasn't ufo's considering they didn't find any ufo parts in the debris either.