Review of All Chinese People's Liberation Army Equipment / Quantity of All Equipment

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 27 сен 2024
  • Become a channel sponsor, and you'll get access to exclusive bonuses. Learn more:
    / @armyencyclopedia
    The People's Liberation Army (PLA) is the armed wing of the Chinese Communist Party and the principal military force of the People's Republic of China. The PLA consists of five service branches: the Ground Force, Navy, Air Force, Rocket Force, and Strategic Support Force. It is under the leadership of the Central Military Commission with its chairman as commander-in-chief.
    Today, the majority of military units around the country are assigned to one of five theater commands by geographical location. The PLA is the world's largest military force and has the second largest defense budget in the world. China's military expenditure was US$292 billion in 2022, accounting for 13 percent of the world's defense expenditures. It is also one of the fastest modernizing militaries in the world, and has been termed as a potential military superpower, with significant regional defense and rising global power projection capabilities.
    _______________________________
    ► More Military videos on: / quasarentertainment
    TWITEER: / quasarenter
    _______________________________
    00:00:00 PEOPLE'S LIBERATION ARMY
    00:00:07 PLA GROUND FORCE
    00:00:15 - Main battle tanks
    00:01:11 - Infantry fighting vehicles
    00:02:15 - Armored personnel carriers
    00:03:03 - High mobility vehicles
    00:04:23 - Assault guns
    00:04:55 - Anti-tank missile carrier
    00:05:51 - Logistic and utility trucks
    00:07:43 - Light utility vehicle
    00:08:23 - Self-propelled howitzer
    00:09:59 - Field howitzer
    00:10:39 - Mortar carrier
    00:11:19 - Self-propelled multiple rocket system
    00:12:39 - Self-propelled anti-aircraft weapon
    00:14:31 - Towed anti-aircraft weapon
    00:14:47 - Military engineering
    00:19:03 - Special vehicles
    00:20:39 - Landing craft
    00:21:03 - Logistic and support vessel
    00:21:27 - Transport aircraft
    00:21:59 - Helicopters
    00:23:43 - UAVs
    00:24:55 - Radar
    00:27:27 PLA AIR FORCE
    00:27:35 - Combat aircraft
    00:29:35 - AWACS
    00:30:15 - Reconnaissance
    00:30:39 - Electronic warfare
    00:31:19 - Maritime patrol
    00:31:43 - Tanker
    00:32:15 - Transport
    00:34:07 - Helicopters
    00:35:27 - Trainer aircraft
    00:36:23 - UAVs
    00:37:43 - SAM system
    00:38:47 - Anti-aircraft gun
    00:39:19 PLA AIR FORCE AIRBORNE CORPS
    00:39:27 - Armoured fighting vehicles
    00:40:23 - Artillery
    00:41:03 - Anti-tank guided missile
    00:41:19 - Helicopters
    00:41:59 - Transport
    00:42:39 - Anti-aircraft gun
    00:42:55 PLA ROCKET FORCE
    00:43:03 - Hypersonic glide vehicles
    00:43:19 - Intercontinental ballistic missiles
    00:43:59 - Intermediate-range ballistic missiles
    00:44:15 - Medium-range ballistic missiles
    00:44:47 - Short-range ballistic missiles
    00:45:19 - Cruise missiles
    00:45:43 PLA STRATEGIC SUPPORT FORCE
    00:45:51 - Satellites
    00:46:39 - Tracking ship
    00:46:55 - Transport ship
    00:47:11 - Anti-satellite missile
    00:47:27 - Ballistic missile defense system
    00:47:43 - Radars
    00:48:15 PLA NAVY
    00:48:23 - Nuclear ballistic missile submarines
    00:48:39 - Conventional ballistic missile submarines
    00:48:55 - Nuclear attack submarines
    00:49:19 - Conventional attack submarines
    00:49:59 - Aircraft carriers
    00:50:31 - Destroyers
    00:51:43 - Frigates
    00:52:31 - Corvettes
    00:52:47 - Coastal warfare vessels
    00:53:35 - Amphibious warfare ships
    00:55:03 - Minor amphibious warfare crafts
    00:56:08 - Mine warfare vessels
    00:57:04 - Buoy tenders
    00:57:28 - Cargo ships
    00:58:40 - Degaussing and deperming ships
    00:59:04 - Diving support vessels
    00:59:28 - Fleet replenishment
    01:00:24 - General purpose research ships
    01:01:12 - Hospital ships
    01:02:00 - Icebreakers
    01:02:16 - Oceanographic research ships
    01:02:48 - Oceanographic surveillance ships
    01:03:12 - Personnel transports
    01:03:44 - Rescue and salvage ships
    01:04:34 - Spy ships
    01:05:06 - Submarine support ships
    01:05:46 - Submersibles
    01:06:34 - Tankers
    01:07:30 - Combat aircraft
    01:08:34 - AWACS
    01:09:14 - Reconnaissance
    01:09:38 - Electronic warfare
    01:10:02 - Maritime patrol
    01:10:26 - Tanker
    01:10:42 - Transport
    01:11:54 - Helicopters
    01:12:58 - Trainer aircraft
    01:13:46 - UAVs
    01:14:18 PLA NAVY MARINE CORPS
    01:14:26 - Light tank
    01:14:42 - Amphibious assault gun
    01:15:14 - Amphibious IFV
    01:15:38 - Armored personnel carriers
    01:16:10 - Utility vehicles
    01:16:34 - Self-propelled howitzer
    01:17:14 - Multiple Launch rocket system
    01:17:30 - Mortar carrier
    01:17:46 - Helicopters
    01:18:18 PLA NAVY COASTAL DEFENSE FORCE
    01:18:26 - Anti-ship and land attack cruise missiles
    01:19:14 CHINA COAST GUARD
    01:19:22 - Vessels
    01:25:54 - Maritime patrol aircraft
    01:26:18 - Helicopters
    #chinesearmy #chinesenavy #chinesearmedforces #chineseairforce #full #review #equipment #China #army #forces #peoplesliberationarmy

Комментарии • 620

  • @ArmyEncyclopedia
    @ArmyEncyclopedia  7 месяцев назад +14

    ► More Military videos on: ruclips.net/user/QUASAREntertainmentvideos

    • @mohdfahmi8841
      @mohdfahmi8841 7 месяцев назад +1

      //;**;*;;*;*;;*;;//.

    • @嘉宇陈
      @嘉宇陈 7 месяцев назад

      你踏马的漏了好多装备,傻叉

  • @抓鲁迅跟我周树人什么
    @抓鲁迅跟我周树人什么 7 месяцев назад +63

    很多数据都不准,而且过于老旧,已经更新的淘汰的还以为有。

    • @andyle1516
      @andyle1516 7 месяцев назад +17

      他给出的数据,应该还不够那29个重装旅分的。。更别提其他部队了。总不能提着烧火棍骑着自行车去战场吧。。

    • @user-el4ws7pt4w
      @user-el4ws7pt4w 7 месяцев назад +15

      真实数量除了pla,谁都不知道,尤其是那几艘核潜艇,连猜都没法猜。能整理这么全的,在中外军迷中做出的贡献已经属于第一梯队了。

    • @未央笑笑生
      @未央笑笑生 7 месяцев назад

      这种视频就是来钓鱼的,故意说错一些,刺激那些愣头青泄露机密

    • @WAW90
      @WAW90 7 месяцев назад +3

      @@andyle1516 你这个标好,透过外部看本质。

    • @liuyangyang
      @liuyangyang 7 месяцев назад

      @@user-el4ws7pt4w 战术核潜艇刚刚过1打,战略的估计不过5

  • @biboyumandar1538
    @biboyumandar1538 7 месяцев назад +34

    中国万岁 LONG LIVE CHINA !!! MORE POWER TO THE PLA !!!

  • @長沙市熱心市民
    @長沙市熱心市民 7 месяцев назад +32

    中国排在美国 俄罗斯 印度 越南 日本 韩国之后,我们中国还是一个发展中国家。😊😊(韩国宇宙第一)

    • @paullamhk
      @paullamhk 7 месяцев назад +5

      🤫🤣

    • @ShannonDrawdy
      @ShannonDrawdy 6 месяцев назад

      是个被共产党割韭菜的国家

    • @月耀霸下
      @月耀霸下 6 месяцев назад +8

      @@ShannonDrawdy啊……对对对…

    • @jemler3speak
      @jemler3speak 6 месяцев назад +2

      这才是发展中国家该有的态度,我们就是人均1000的穷国,没什么可看的❤

    • @iznac9318
      @iznac9318 6 месяцев назад +2

      ​@@ShannonDrawdy唉,还好你觉醒了,能不能先觉带动后觉,给我发点钱让我有理由支持你

  • @oberstleutnant787
    @oberstleutnant787 7 месяцев назад +69

    Chinese military are well equipped, and their weapons are not antiquated like some of US armed forces

    • @peacedude-gy3zl
      @peacedude-gy3zl 7 месяцев назад +1

      😂😂😂h-6 and j-8 and j-7 aren't antiquated

    • @oberstleutnant787
      @oberstleutnant787 7 месяцев назад +14

      J-8 and J-7 are retired from service, and would be converted into drones.
      H-6s are not as antiquated as B-52.

    • @accountantthe3394
      @accountantthe3394 7 месяцев назад +4

      ​@@peacedude-gy3zlJ-7s are drones now bruh...wdym? 😂

    • @杨-c5b
      @杨-c5b 7 месяцев назад

      59改,59爆改,

    • @starrysea4442
      @starrysea4442 7 месяцев назад +1

      比不过美国

  • @苍穹
    @苍穹 6 месяцев назад +20

    数量不是问题,自己能生产的东西随时都可以在后边加个零。

    • @li-hi4lp
      @li-hi4lp 6 месяцев назад

      中肯的

    • @user-im5vi8rx9g
      @user-im5vi8rx9g 6 месяцев назад +1

      الصين لا تمتلك الشجاعه لاستعاده تايوان

    • @丁真-y3o
      @丁真-y3o 6 месяцев назад +5

      @@user-im5vi8rx9gsorry I can’t speak noodles.

    • @leepi4645
      @leepi4645 6 месяцев назад

      要不你们帮我们一把?在中东搞点事情给我们创造点机会@@user-im5vi8rx9g

    • @DRIO-sf7ll
      @DRIO-sf7ll 6 месяцев назад +3

      哥们你们还有网?我还以为中东都打成废墟了😂

  • @幽兰黛尔-c4r
    @幽兰黛尔-c4r 7 месяцев назад +14

    看了一下99式A的数量,应该是2018年之前的数据,也还好吧。

    • @kenwang3021
      @kenwang3021 7 месяцев назад +2

      这几年预算都给空军海军火箭军了 陆军发展的确实不多 主要还是以信息化升级为主 数量和规模其实还是在精减和优化

    • @Xiaozhu-
      @Xiaozhu- 6 месяцев назад

      搞军改主要​@@kenwang3021

  • @jzeng2022
    @jzeng2022 6 месяцев назад +2

    Modern Warfare The number of tanks, personnel carriers, artillery, etc. really doesn't mean much. Based on the reforms of the Chinese Army in recent years, the division-level organization has been dismantled and the organization of group armies and combined brigades is to meet the needs of modern warfare. Modern warfare is a multi-form war involving joint operations of multiple arms. Unmanned combat equipment, communication capabilities, networks, logistics, AI technology, and industrial manufacturing capabilities will play a key role in the direction of the war. In a war with China, you may not see a large number of soldiers gathering on the front line to fight.

  • @ter7303
    @ter7303 7 месяцев назад +24

    These are for defense

    • @marijnnn4992
      @marijnnn4992 3 месяца назад +1

      😂😂😂😂your funny

    • @PainkillerChinese
      @PainkillerChinese Месяц назад

      ​@@marijnnn4992If it weren't for defense, your country would belong to China now.😂😂😂

    • @marijnnn4992
      @marijnnn4992 Месяц назад

      @@PainkillerChinese my country is no where close to china and i,m just saying thats its bs to say these weapons are only for defence

  • @sandmanhan6054
    @sandmanhan6054 7 месяцев назад +40

    Let me put it straight, l never fear China and their success on communism practise. because although I can never be As good/altruistic as a chinese Communist, as a Normal selfish person who pretty much enjoy living by my work, Loving my family and the world and caring only for those i feel responsible for. i reasonably admire their genuine altruism intension for all classes of their people, matureness of their governance and recent decades of economical growth, they still had huge richest versus poor gap however they were able to get rid of extremely poor and every human in their country are able to work and earn a life that worth living. simple moral tells me, i am not those rich people can only rely on nonproductive financial games, robbery, colonizing, prosecution, invasion, bombarding and all kinds of strong predator weak meat war crime to get money and power, nor i care to be those racist who were so pathetic to watching people dog fighting for fun, every good soul on earth shall never fear or jealous of China's peaceful progress as long awaited evolution of human civilization.

    • @三立李
      @三立李 7 месяцев назад

      哈哈哈哈,其实现在的中国和共产主义真是没什么关系。邓小平就是背叛了毛泽东,本质上是第二共和国

    • @街溜子-m8s
      @街溜子-m8s 6 месяцев назад

      你了解他们以后你就明白你今天的话有多愚蠢你知道烂尾楼吗知道三合大神吗知道中国底层工人的工作时长和工作环境吗知道什么叫恶意讨薪吗不知道就问问其他中国人

  • @MAOSHI-GT
    @MAOSHI-GT 7 месяцев назад +6

    我们都不知道有多少装备,再说了这些都是哪一年的数据,明面的数据和实际的差距你又知道多少,你们慢慢猜吧😂😂😂

  • @ashenoneartorias1396
    @ashenoneartorias1396 7 месяцев назад +19

    you forgot one most important PLC equipment, its the American LGPTQ+ soldiers

    • @kyc880
      @kyc880 6 месяцев назад +4

      😂but they are not made in China, please ask Biden for more details🙃

  • @羽生結弦-h1o
    @羽生結弦-h1o 7 месяцев назад +16

    Please do not use NATO code names to refer to Chinese weapons and equipment, they have their own names

  • @lainfonet
    @lainfonet 7 месяцев назад +26

    After a casual look, the Air Force fighter section lacks J-20 and J-35 stealth fighters.

    • @lainfonet
      @lainfonet 7 месяцев назад +17

      As long as Indians are happy.

    • @黄伟-q6t
      @黄伟-q6t 7 месяцев назад

      28:57 J20

    • @Chineseboy瑞
      @Chineseboy瑞 7 месяцев назад

      ​@@lainfonetAre you from India?The military parade in that country in India.It's like a monkey show

    • @battlecomputer
      @battlecomputer 7 месяцев назад

      @@黄伟-q6t 100+ i think you need update about it.

    • @xuxy
      @xuxy 7 месяцев назад

      Also a quick glance of the previous minute gave me the impression that, this video lack a deeper dive into the variation of one single model (i.e. J-10A/B/C/S etc.).

  • @yuumetal2363
    @yuumetal2363 7 месяцев назад +3

    27:48 soooooo long. I watched up to here.
    China has so many kinds of arms

    • @ibrahimadia2290
      @ibrahimadia2290 6 месяцев назад

      It,s only the biggining wait from here some years

  • @li科城
    @li科城 7 месяцев назад +17

    Our China is very poor, the people can't afford to eat eggs, and the military strength can't even compare with China and Taiwan Province.😅

    • @wujing-kt1fg
      @wujing-kt1fg 7 месяцев назад +3

      战忽局😂

    • @paullamhk
      @paullamhk 7 месяцев назад +1

      🤣🤫

    • @iznac9318
      @iznac9318 6 месяцев назад +4

      唉,我因为上个月忽悠的人数太少,昨天有关部门把去年奖励我的茶叶蛋没收了😢

    • @高智甲
      @高智甲 6 месяцев назад

      战忽局同志😂

    • @odclS
      @odclS 6 месяцев назад

      我没意见

  • @BabbleJensen
    @BabbleJensen 6 месяцев назад +1

    Many of the equipment introduced in this video were eliminated, retired and sealed by the China army.

  • @shuoli5813
    @shuoli5813 6 месяцев назад +1

    definitely incorecte number。 internsof 071, ijust saw 4 at same time in same naval port。

    • @marijnnn4992
      @marijnnn4992 3 месяца назад

      Thise are rpobky different models

  • @Netslow.
    @Netslow. 7 месяцев назад +5

    It’s like the data from 20 years ago

  • @raymondtay3532
    @raymondtay3532 7 месяцев назад +9

    Well done China PLA Super Technologies. 💪💪👍👍👏👏💯💯♥️♥️

  • @bentony7548
    @bentony7548 7 месяцев назад +98

    this is not all the weapons China have... 😅😅😅

    • @BBCisSb250
      @BBCisSb250 7 месяцев назад +24

      Of course, most of the equipment is still classified.

    • @Alexey_Gerasimov
      @Alexey_Gerasimov 7 месяцев назад +4

      ​@@BBCisSb250Засекречена или развалилась

    • @Lawel-i7n
      @Lawel-i7n 7 месяцев назад

      @@Alexey_GerasimovIn conceal

    • @АндрейМ-ф5н
      @АндрейМ-ф5н 7 месяцев назад +4

      ​@@Alexey_Gerasimovпо своей техники другую несудят , танки РФ т60 и т34 😂😂😂

    • @hyjcxyz
      @hyjcxyz 7 месяцев назад

      如果有战争,这些武器三个月可以复制一倍

  • @Vokuud
    @Vokuud 7 месяцев назад +15

    Make one video of russian army 👀👀👀

  • @xelkim9666
    @xelkim9666 7 месяцев назад +22

    중국 만세❤🇨🇳

  • @ahamed_althaf
    @ahamed_althaf 7 месяцев назад +5

    can you make a Portuguese army vedio ❤

  • @heskabeb1
    @heskabeb1 6 месяцев назад

    And don’t forget the Chinese most powerfull weapon, the manufactury ability of large ammunition in a short of time.

  • @bhupainderpathania5710
    @bhupainderpathania5710 7 месяцев назад +2

    India have more than 15000 anty tank 4th generation missiles.......
    Love from India to china

    • @未央笑笑生
      @未央笑笑生 7 месяцев назад +5

      Protect those Indians who can launch missiles. China can produce 1 million drones in one day if it wants to.

    • @bhupainderpathania5710
      @bhupainderpathania5710 7 месяцев назад

      @@未央笑笑生
      We can produce 2 millions drons in one day

    • @aurigalin6327
      @aurigalin6327 7 месяцев назад +2

      😂 India 😂

    • @漂浮的云
      @漂浮的云 7 месяцев назад

      打坦克还用导弹吗你家钱真多

    • @bhupainderpathania5710
      @bhupainderpathania5710 7 месяцев назад

      @@漂浮的云
      First of all try to write in English then try to fight with your opponent

  • @Yooooooo6
    @Yooooooo6 6 месяцев назад

    韩国称,俄罗斯每天使用1.5万枚炮弹,自9月份以来,朝鲜已向俄罗斯发送了6700个集装箱,其中载有超过300万枚炮弹----🥵300万也就是中国两个钢铁大省一天的生产量

  • @nicholaslau264
    @nicholaslau264 7 месяцев назад +5

    Yemen army equipment please

  • @MarkH10
    @MarkH10 2 месяца назад

    Requirements for a successful invasion are numerous. One glaring deficiency the PLAN has is sea lift capacity. The most obvious successful parallel to the PLAN invading Taiwan is DDay. Very similar. As this video points out, the CCP has a total capacity of about 4% of what the Allies used on DDay. Look again at the LSTs as an example. The CCP has stated for 35 years they are about to attack. The Allies built over 1100 LSTs from June, 1942 to Jun, 1944. Similarly, the CCP has built 88 since 1955. Their largest program is fro 8 Type 075. Suspended at 3.M ore than half of all amphibious craft built are retired.
    In order to exert mere air power over the Strait, the PLAF needs approximately 1 airbase less than 1 mile from the coast per 5 miles of coast facing Taiwan. Second tier needs 3x more, and third requires 5x more. The CCP has perhaps 4 airbases within 20 miles of the Strait. They do not have the aircraft to fill those. They do not have the infrastructure to carry out air ops over the Strait at an invasion level. They do not have the pilot instruction capacity to carry out current staffing needs.
    Chinese persons and the CCP speak in contemporary terms. An invasion of Taiwan is a war, and as such requires what the nations of WWI had to accomplish.
    The Wehrmacht increased 185x over the course of the Nazi leadership. 55% became casualties. The Soviet Red Army increased 22x over 10 years from 1935 to 1945. The US Army increased 88 times from 1935, to 1945. The PLA, with only 60 Generals and current staffing levels, and this list of mere equipment, the PLA has a less than 4% success rate if they invade Taiwan. The CCP needs to increase the PLA to 15 million men if they want to defend the Party and take Taiwan.

    • @番茄-r4t
      @番茄-r4t Месяц назад

      他做这个视频最少5年前了,071,075,未来还有076

    • @MarkH10
      @MarkH10 Месяц назад

      @@番茄-r4t Here is a US Government site. Declassified. Take a look at the 071 and 075. Insufficient. Perhaps the PLAN has 4% of the necessary sealift capacity required. You may also want to study the various amphib operations of the Allies in WWII. The PLA does not meet the requirements for success in such operations.

    • @番茄-r4t
      @番茄-r4t Месяц назад

      @@MarkH10 你说的确实也没错,其实中国高层是不想入侵台湾的,是想维持现状,台湾政府越来越激进了,中国入侵台湾经济代价太大,中国对台湾强硬是因为历史原因,西方在100年前抢走了中国白银,俄罗斯抢走了中国领土,日本抢走了台湾,中国在二战也算胜利国,可是美国一直用台湾做棋子,中国政府需要合法性,需要像中国百姓交代

    • @番茄-r4t
      @番茄-r4t Месяц назад

      @@MarkH10 中国如果不惜代价完全可以占领台湾,但是占领台湾后中国经济可能滑落到世界第6,台湾一片废墟,中国不用完全登录,可以用火箭炮,无人机,飞机把台湾打成巴勒斯坦

    • @MarkH10
      @MarkH10 Месяц назад

      @@番茄-r4t Fomosa was not part of China. The designs the CCP has for taking Taiwan are unusual, as China has no history in Formosa.

  • @seepoo1239
    @seepoo1239 7 месяцев назад +1

    很強了,很多我都沒聽說過,老cder😅

  • @anasdidil2144
    @anasdidil2144 7 месяцев назад +4

    Morocco

    • @not5949
      @not5949 7 месяцев назад

      😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @TP-ie3hj
    @TP-ie3hj 7 месяцев назад +2

    Never seen no heard of a single SU33 in Chinese service? encyclopedia explain?

    • @minhhuytruong8667
      @minhhuytruong8667 7 месяцев назад +1

      They did buy some SU33 prototype from Ukraine to make their J-15 Black Sharks.

    • @saiprateek5779
      @saiprateek5779 7 месяцев назад

      ​@@minhhuytruong8667 prototypes which wasn't into service, which means battle-proven equipment doesn't exist in China..
      Also Chinese equipment are basically Soviet Union made enhanced, rest are unlicensed copies of foreign equipments like NATO..

    • @lmn6335
      @lmn6335 7 месяцев назад +2

      @@saiprateek5779 The Chinese like you best as a "copy" friend, this will allow China to continue to develop its own equipment without being seen as a threat

    • @bennygpc1826
      @bennygpc1826 7 месяцев назад

      FlyingShark​@@minhhuytruong8667

    • @whwh4257
      @whwh4257 7 месяцев назад

      @@saiprateek5779 So, what do Europe and the United States fear from China?

  • @chadlyles5444
    @chadlyles5444 5 месяцев назад

    Almost all Chinese equipment have no pertection.

  • @adellcato9172
    @adellcato9172 3 месяца назад

    Did i jüšt saw America made helicopters there

  • @jacksonteller1337
    @jacksonteller1337 2 месяца назад

    I was trying to find anything in their ground forces they didn't copy i think it was futile. Unfortunately for them they mostly copied Soviet/Russian crap and civilian US equipment. Neither are suitable for military deployment in a modern conflict.

  • @啊喜欢喜欢
    @啊喜欢喜欢 6 месяцев назад

    真实的得看战时组织动员能力,那几乎就是永动机

  • @СакинаКамалова-ц6л
    @СакинаКамалова-ц6л 2 месяца назад

    Сделайте пожалуйста видео армии Турции

  • @Vtech836
    @Vtech836 7 месяцев назад +3

    There are tunnels around a gym in Florya, Istanbul, and a mosque converted from a church. In the gym, there are Chinese people and a place that may belong to the Eastern Romans. Best regards,🇹🇷✍🏽

    • @miguelmig1771
      @miguelmig1771 7 месяцев назад

      hahahaha

    • @Vtech836
      @Vtech836 7 месяцев назад

      @@miguelmig1771 🐐The 500-year-old Slave Market Island of the Ottoman Empire is complex everywhere. From the 500-year-old whorehouse, a synagogue, a church emerged, Karakoy, Istanbul, ablution facilities, toilets, people's places of worship, bad and not good.

    • @Vtech836
      @Vtech836 7 месяцев назад

      @@miguelmig1771 We cannot ask for an account of the properties given to the Ottoman Palace in the world, only Ataturk did.

  • @伟张-j7e
    @伟张-j7e 7 месяцев назад +5

    25年前的数据

    • @Xiaozhu-
      @Xiaozhu- 6 месяцев назад

      ztz 99a:我什么时候变成25年以前的啦🤣

  • @China-Record
    @China-Record 7 месяцев назад

    中国一重合成旅,比得上一个法国的重装合成旅,而中国有29个这样的重装合成旅。

  • @ws-jw1tv
    @ws-jw1tv 7 месяцев назад +9

    没有参考价值,数据太落后

    • @白永亮
      @白永亮 7 месяцев назад

      就是都是许多年前的

    • @zhchen2263
      @zhchen2263 7 месяцев назад

      挺好的,中国军费占gdp比例低,人均军费也低。中国没有任何威胁,世界人民的敌人是那些军国主义国家,他们靠强大的军事实力压迫世界人民,把控世界话语权

  • @miguelmig1771
    @miguelmig1771 7 месяцев назад +15

    If China COULDN'T FACE UNCLE SAM, IT WOULD HAVE ALREADY GONE TO THE BLACK BAG. LOL

    • @kazimierzkalinowski1320
      @kazimierzkalinowski1320 7 месяцев назад

      Pierdolisz Chiny każdego zmiażdzą i Militarnie i Gospodarczo 🇵🇱♥️🇷🇺♥️🥷☯️🏃✌️

  • @raymonddon8875
    @raymonddon8875 7 месяцев назад +4

    for you haters that think china cant fight... my how fast we forgot about nam.

    • @Hmonks
      @Hmonks 7 месяцев назад +1

      They (China) got destroyed in Vietnam against the reserves force in 1979, where as US have won every major battle in Vietnam the thing is when US a major objective they only remain in that position and move on due to political reason.. US have lost most of its war from political reason, but never lost in pure military…

    • @raymonddon8875
      @raymonddon8875 7 месяцев назад +1

      pure b.s., USA cant win korea, nam and Afghan - plain & simple! @@Hmonks

    • @xxrunexx100
      @xxrunexx100 6 месяцев назад

      Tell that to India when Chinese troops cant even handle a border conflict against them😂

    • @raymonddon8875
      @raymonddon8875 6 месяцев назад

      1964, with chairmao, china defeated india with zero effort & only took 24 hrs. @@xxrunexx100

    • @taiwanstillisntacountry
      @taiwanstillisntacountry 2 месяца назад

      ​@@xxrunexx100
      🏳️1962🏳️

  • @travel_yuyu
    @travel_yuyu 6 месяцев назад

    很多都是淘汰多年的老装备,都清库存送给友好国家了

  • @zhenghongyu4534
    @zhenghongyu4534 6 месяцев назад

    应该没有统计气象局

  • @benlee227
    @benlee227 7 месяцев назад +1

    一本正经的胡说八道,很多图片根本不是中国武器,海军部分更是随便乱写,忽悠老外看的。

  • @linyang9536
    @linyang9536 6 месяцев назад

    哪有Z 这Z那的型号坦克,都是59改,就是长了翅膀飞上天,也还是59改😂

  • @鄂凯
    @鄂凯 7 месяцев назад +2

    so many mistakes and misses

  • @JoselitoAbrantes
    @JoselitoAbrantes 2 месяца назад

    39:42 my favorite son's toy 😂

  • @makermeng1401
    @makermeng1401 7 месяцев назад +1

    TYPE 59?

  • @KABUTO10
    @KABUTO10 3 месяца назад +1

    🇧🇷🇷🇺🇮🇳🇨🇳🇿🇦

  • @qake2021
    @qake2021 7 месяцев назад +3

    🤣🤣🤣 we only know what we can see or what 🇨🇳want you to know. 😁😁😁

  • @王以恆-r9o
    @王以恆-r9o 7 месяцев назад

    没那么多,全是59改👌

  • @misaghkhosravi4541
    @misaghkhosravi4541 6 месяцев назад

    DLE , DLB

  • @bijoylaha7245
    @bijoylaha7245 7 месяцев назад +1

    India mulit laser wepans game changes

    • @龙天成-w7z
      @龙天成-w7z 2 месяца назад

      😂😂😂是的,你们的武器刚成立在PPT文件上

  • @나구리-g3u
    @나구리-g3u 7 месяцев назад +1

    중국은 천연자원이 많고 인구도 많다
    저렴한 노동시장과 물가로 장기전이 가능한 나라
    민주주의가 아니기 때문에 군사 동원과 전쟁에서 유리한 점이 많다

    • @赣东北嗦粉仙人
      @赣东北嗦粉仙人 7 месяцев назад

      中国人都是自愿参军,韩国人才需要强制服兵役😂

    • @zewang5046
      @zewang5046 7 месяцев назад

      中国人保卫自己的国家,从来不是被迫的。

    • @赣东北嗦粉仙人
      @赣东北嗦粉仙人 7 месяцев назад

      @@zewang5046 曾经被我国暴打的伪政权,且强制服兵役的烂地方有脸说我们‘强迫’,棒子是这样的

    • @炎阳-c1l
      @炎阳-c1l 6 месяцев назад

      우리는 조국을 사랑하므로 조국을 지키기 위해 최선을 다할 것입니다. 우리는 평화를 사랑하지만 다른 나라가 우리를 침략하면 그에게 죽음을 알리겠습니다☠️

    • @BabbleJensen
      @BabbleJensen 6 месяцев назад

      중국은 한국강제복 병역처럼 고교나 대학을 졸업한 많은 사람들이 군대에 참가할 수 있다. 안정된 경제는 첨단 기술 투입과 해군함대 건설을 유지할 수 있다. 중국과 한국 모두 같은 언어를 구사하지만 서로 싸우는 친형제가 있다🙃

  • @АндрейМ-ф5н
    @АндрейМ-ф5н 5 месяцев назад

    Показывает старое китайское вооружение , новое непоказывает , половина того что он показал снято с вооружения 😂

  • @davidkei2114
    @davidkei2114 6 месяцев назад

    No, no, they are the 1st troops of Asia, so they can open their whole military targets which, are air bases and military goods factories and weapons, even India and the US knew this, I truly trust they can not act easily, so PLA, you don't need to worry about this and just open sources. We want to know your power and the locations of military properties, and we want to check who is more powerful compared to Russia. Russia is getting lose power through combat with Ukraine, so now it is a chance to be top of Asia. To Prepare defend invade North Mongolia, move to the troops to the North Asia. Russia might change their military purpose which, try to collaborate with Monglia.

    • @Huajierenmeiluziye
      @Huajierenmeiluziye 6 месяцев назад

      There is a mental stress inside the Chinese that they have not let go of that China was a punching bag for every great power before 1949 because they were weak, malnourished and suffered more than Indians, Jews and Native Americans

  • @HM_skyw
    @HM_skyw 7 месяцев назад

    50:18 wrong pic

  • @RolandRivera-hx2lj
    @RolandRivera-hx2lj 6 месяцев назад

    May mga pro china pla.sa tube no it's ksi lagi binabgo.. Comment ko..kya.. Stay..vigilant.. Too..

  • @Jack-vs4pf
    @Jack-vs4pf 7 месяцев назад

    China does not use English, and it is not unreasonable to retain the original culture.

  • @superpooper_2030
    @superpooper_2030 7 месяцев назад +1

    honestly, i think you should review great India army equipment and state of the art weapon

    • @Mai-iq1lo
      @Mai-iq1lo 7 месяцев назад +10

      印度宇宙第一😂😂😂😂

    • @原子小金剛-c1y
      @原子小金剛-c1y 7 месяцев назад +11

      不准任何人批評三哥的武器,三哥是全世界第一😅

    • @acuantjahyadi7393
      @acuantjahyadi7393 7 месяцев назад +6

      Senjata paling di takutin kepunyaan India itu Sapi 🐂 😂😂

    • @jjkkk1646
      @jjkkk1646 7 месяцев назад +6

      ​@acu不,是摩托车😅

    • @LiuMang.
      @LiuMang. 7 месяцев назад +1

      万国装备?

  • @yuumetal2363
    @yuumetal2363 7 месяцев назад +1

    8:39

  • @搞出原子弹挺直腰杆子
    @搞出原子弹挺直腰杆子 7 месяцев назад

    son,father,grandfather

  • @artshunhao
    @artshunhao 5 месяцев назад

    运20呢?

  • @fatfish3452
    @fatfish3452 6 месяцев назад

    Chinese like to hide the best things, USA like to show off future items😂😂😂😂😂 Chinese like to take off a 0 at the end, and Americans Locke to add a 0. Indian not only like to show future but also add more 0s at the end 😂😂😂

  • @fabiobondes2368
    @fabiobondes2368 6 месяцев назад

    52:46 essas embarcações é de Taiwan e não da china. Saudações do brasil

    • @CR400-BF
      @CR400-BF 6 месяцев назад

      第一,台湾属于中国,这是历史遗留问题。第二,这是人民海军的22型导弹快艇,不是沱江级巡逻舰。

    • @YunLuoShanZe
      @YunLuoShanZe 6 месяцев назад

      These are the PLA Type 022 missile boats, most of which have been retired. Which Taiwan's Tuojiang-class patrol ships copied from the PLA.

    • @CR400-BF
      @CR400-BF 6 месяцев назад

      ​@@YunLuoShanZe没退役了,5个支队,1个支队12艘,都在服役。之前上岸只是正常保养,不是上岸封存。因为铝合金船体太难养护

  • @carlicarl6861
    @carlicarl6861 7 месяцев назад +3

    Brazil🎉❤psl thanks

  • @alninja
    @alninja 7 месяцев назад +5

    يعتقد صاحب الفيديو ان أسلحة الجيش الصيني قديمه

    • @The-d9h
      @The-d9h 7 месяцев назад +5

      这正是我想要的 它们对中国了解

    • @weimingwu-f8j
      @weimingwu-f8j 7 месяцев назад +1

      这数据至少是十年前的了

    • @大宝-q7j
      @大宝-q7j 7 месяцев назад +1

      当他们小看别人的时候那么他就开始向灭亡一步步迈进了

    • @达瓦里希-j6z
      @达瓦里希-j6z 7 месяцев назад +1

      挺好的啊,我们就喜欢别人小看我们

    • @キエキゼン
      @キエキゼン 7 месяцев назад +1

      我们要的就是这个效果 ⌓‿⌓

  • @lirzayev6291
    @lirzayev6291 7 месяцев назад +2

    Azərbaycan 🇦🇿🇦🇿

  • @kemvillarico18
    @kemvillarico18 4 месяца назад

    Water tank rocket force😂😂😂👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻

    • @voidtempering8700
      @voidtempering8700 4 месяца назад

      Why are we still spreading misinformation?

    • @taiwanstillisntacountry
      @taiwanstillisntacountry 2 месяца назад

      🏳️1962🏳️

    • @jiasongwu6059
      @jiasongwu6059 2 месяца назад

      Yes, that’s wat we r, water force. And we have gold, wood, fire, and earth as well🫡

  • @weitan9499
    @weitan9499 7 месяцев назад +1

    This data is at least 20+ years outdated and some equipements even only deployed by militia, are u mocking yrself or the entire audience?

  • @jeanlack-sr5sx
    @jeanlack-sr5sx 6 месяцев назад

    你知道个球!!他自己都不知道有多少

  • @爸爸-e6b
    @爸爸-e6b 7 месяцев назад

    财不外露,中国的一句古话

  • @thiluyenhoang4306
    @thiluyenhoang4306 7 месяцев назад

    China's 👉🇨🇳🇨🇳🎆🎆

  • @stevenmdf8882
    @stevenmdf8882 7 месяцев назад

    A mixing style of western and soviet

  • @逆风踏凌霄
    @逆风踏凌霄 7 месяцев назад +1

    你的数据可笑至极

  • @AntonioDiche
    @AntonioDiche 7 месяцев назад +3

    Paper tiger!

    • @jesussonofgod6284
      @jesussonofgod6284 7 месяцев назад +6

      But even America dare not...
      If India worships America

    • @johnsun3619
      @johnsun3619 7 месяцев назад

      纸老虎这个词是中国大陆发明的

    • @saiprateek5779
      @saiprateek5779 7 месяцев назад +1

      ​​​@@jesussonofgod6284 only 11%, they're Christians so.. rest Muslims worship Saudi and UAE
      Meanwhile 70% who are Hindus worship India..
      anything else you wanna know about India please visit India, because misinformation and misinterpretation doesn't work😊

    • @taiwanstillisntacountry
      @taiwanstillisntacountry 7 месяцев назад +10

      😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
      ✌🏼🇨🇳✌🏼1962✌🏼🇨🇳✌🏼
      Do you even know where the term "paper tiger" comes from?

    • @jason980e
      @jason980e 7 месяцев назад +2

      Unlike some countries that love war 🥰

  • @عليموسىقاسم-ب9ش
    @عليموسىقاسم-ب9ش 5 месяцев назад

    Iraq

  • @amitgupta-cg4ho
    @amitgupta-cg4ho 7 месяцев назад

    Chin Aaj a rahe hai

  • @junlifang2896
    @junlifang2896 7 месяцев назад

    🎉

  • @YyUu-do6gn
    @YyUu-do6gn 7 месяцев назад +1

    bro please myanmar

    • @Can-1995
      @Can-1995 3 месяца назад

      Myanmar is Mini 🤣🙈

  • @tikiewel
    @tikiewel 7 месяцев назад

    China national anthem

  • @Бат-ъ1ы
    @Бат-ъ1ы 6 месяцев назад

    這都是以前的裝備了,都淘汰了。

  • @LobnaEmam-nb4ue
    @LobnaEmam-nb4ue 7 месяцев назад

    مصر لو سمحت

  • @Rindelheiger
    @Rindelheiger 7 месяцев назад

    The design is up-to-date and looks good. It's all junk and it's all lies

  • @MiChaeLGUITR
    @MiChaeLGUITR 7 месяцев назад

    Купить черный

  • @ThaeronDelaRosa
    @ThaeronDelaRosa 7 месяцев назад +1

    I like China's tanks more if made out of lego:)

    • @LuisMolina-u3x
      @LuisMolina-u3x 7 месяцев назад

      When buy ?

    • @saiprateek5779
      @saiprateek5779 7 месяцев назад

      ​@@LuisMolina-u3x Maybe not.. for long term in case 😊

  • @十三楼的道爷
    @十三楼的道爷 6 месяцев назад

    做这种视频有什么意义?数据又没有真实性。吃饱了,没事做。

  • @kimchigook6673
    @kimchigook6673 7 месяцев назад

    strongest bio weapon CHNVID-19

    • @柳一凡
      @柳一凡 7 месяцев назад

      那是你美国粑粑的生化武器,而中国对付你们韩国棒子的最强武器是山东大白菜😂😂😂

    • @柳一凡
      @柳一凡 7 месяцев назад

      而世界上最牛啤的军队是韩国,居然敢在美国的军事基地里建立国家!!!👍👍👍👍宇宙第一!!!

    • @kakalika413
      @kakalika413 7 месяцев назад

      殖民地没有资格说话

  • @Genadz13
    @Genadz13 7 месяцев назад +8

    Армия Китая ( НОАК ) уже давно не принимала участия в боевых действиях . И судить о её боеготовности и боевых качествах этой техники невозможно . Предпологаю , что НОАК ограниченно готова к боям . Поэтому НОАК не сможет расчитывать на качество подготовки , а только может расчитывать на превосходство в численности своих солдат и техники.

    • @alexhu5491
      @alexhu5491 7 месяцев назад +8

      You live in the 20th century, Chinese military spending is 290 billion Usd, planes, ships, tanks are new, built in the last 20 years

    • @Genadz13
      @Genadz13 7 месяцев назад

      ​​@@alexhu5491 большие расходы не означают , что техника обладает высокими боевыми качествами и солдаты НОАК смогут показать высокие боевые качества . Посмотрите , как хвалили танки " Леопард " и английские танки . И как они оказались не такими хорошими в бою .

    • @Genadz13
      @Genadz13 7 месяцев назад +6

      ​@justice5266 не соглашусь . Много смелых , отважных , но плохо подготовленных и без опыта уже погибло в Украине , Палестине , Сирии . Мой дед , воевавший во Вторую Мировую войну рассказывал - герои , трусы и дураки гибли первыми . Осторожные ( но не трусы ) , умные , быстро обучающиеся воевали долго и оставались в живых . Также говорил играло роль и везение . Кто то мог погибнуть от случайной пули , а кто то всю войну прошёл без ранений .

    • @alexhu5491
      @alexhu5491 7 месяцев назад +1

      ​@@Genadz13The wars of the 21st century are war of money and industrial capacity, China has a lot of money, 1/3 of the world's industry is located in China

    • @alexhu5491
      @alexhu5491 7 месяцев назад +8

      ​@@Genadz13China and Russia have developed 5 generation aircraft in the same period, in 2023 Russia has only 8 Su-57, in 2023 China has 300 J 20, this month J 35 new 5 generation aircraft is testing capabilities on Fujian aircraft carrier. Why is there so much difference? Money and industrial capacity

  • @feiwang5306
    @feiwang5306 7 месяцев назад +1

    时间真长这个视频

  • @risyadbambang9614
    @risyadbambang9614 7 месяцев назад

    Next russia

    • @漂浮的云
      @漂浮的云 7 месяцев назад

      我们中国哲学是以理服人不打仗,打仗是傻逼才干的事,,发展军事只是不想想自己在像以前一样被人打,可能你们不知道我们的百年屈辱,我们中国可是永远记得,,不想被做鱼肉只有发展才可以保护自己,

  • @Chanchyin
    @Chanchyin 7 месяцев назад

    這數據有多舊, 哈哈🤣

    • @fish542
      @fish542 7 месяцев назад

      真实就是这样子的,这是最新的

    • @lili-cb4mx
      @lili-cb4mx 7 месяцев назад

      ​@@fish542真实情况是中国五代机都有300架了

  • @ttfegoxuk
    @ttfegoxuk 6 месяцев назад

    😂

  • @karlotto689
    @karlotto689 7 месяцев назад +2

    Pls south korea 😊

    • @xelkim9666
      @xelkim9666 7 месяцев назад +1

      핵탄두없으면북한못이겨

    • @Hmonks
      @Hmonks 7 месяцев назад

      @@xelkim9666😂😂😂 North Korea military tech at most is 1960 tech.. you commies really under estimate SK…

    • @xelkim9666
      @xelkim9666 7 месяцев назад

      @@Hmonks your ignorance doesn't make it fact😭, if you think they still so backward southkorea wouldn't need to keep their men in military 🇺🇲🐶, keep stupidly to yourself

  • @chongqing-k2m
    @chongqing-k2m 6 месяцев назад

    统一台湾

  • @bunaalvlog7348
    @bunaalvlog7348 7 месяцев назад

    Low class 😂😂😂😂😂

  • @АндрейМ-ф5н
    @АндрейМ-ф5н 7 месяцев назад

    НОАК 🇨🇳👍🇨🇳👍🇨🇳👍🇨🇳👍🇨🇳👍

  • @خالدالخير-ك8د
    @خالدالخير-ك8د 7 месяцев назад

    ❤❤❤❤😂😂😂