There's a much less well known, but similar incident that also took place in 1993. Khamar Darban was an instance where a group of hikers were making their way through mountains in Western Siberia, close to Mongolia, and died under mysterious circumstances. Only difference is there was an eyewitness survivor, a 17 year old girl who was part of the group. She reported that most died of exposure, but under weird circumstances like trying to rip their clothes off and even banging their heads against rocks, almost like a bout of insanity that overtook them. However, due to the remoteness of the location, it was 3.5 weeks before rescuers could make it up there, so decomposition had affected the bodies pretty badly. Lots of theories ranging from poisoned food to infrasound resulting from a freak storm that hit them, but interesting incident nonetheless. There's a video on RUclips covering it but aside from that very little except some Russian translations from the early 1990s. The sole survivor changed her name, moved away and has refused all requests for interviews.
It could’ve been from HAPE (High altitude Pulmonary edema) and HACE (High altitude cerebral edema). Mixed with hypothermia, and you’ll go insane. Plus, there’s ways for ‘infections’ to be spread amongst one another, so that would explain the shared hypothermia, and mania.
So what's the similarity? You just wrote what you've heard on the internet and you have no clue about it. The survivor gave an interview. Your username really fits you
@@megamond I doubt it, they would’ve been found with it still in their blood. Still, if you’re doing phychedelics, you’re not gonna go retarded. It doesn’t really affect decision making, either.
@@mr.pissedoff1903 In the case of the Dyatlov group, however, it wasn't HAPE, which is easy to prove! Because the summit of the Kholatchakhl is only at 1,096.7 m (3,598 ft). This level is not high enough to trigger HAPE. During my service in the military, I've been to much higher mountains several times, with temperatures sometimes hovering around -20 degrees Celsius for days. Incidentally, no one died, but there was one case in my company in which a soldier lost toes because of the cold and carelessness.
The aged Yuri Yudin, the sole survivor of the team, had done a video interview. In it he stated that he doubted the official investigation report about the death of his friends and he believed that the government was somehow involved. Before he passed away, he had asked to be buried in the same place as his friends.
17:50 It would not have needed to be what we consider to be an avalanche. Not a wall of snow barreling down the slope, but rather a relatively small slab of compacted snow. When they pitched their tent on the slope, they cut out the snow to create a flat area to pitch the tent on. This created a deep notch in the slope. The "avalanche" would have been a block of snow (probably a 3 m wide by 3 m long by 1 metre high = 9 cubic metres) detaching from the slope above the tent, falling into the notch and dropping onto the hikers. A cubic metre/yard of snow weighs a fair bit (50 kg), so a "small" slab of compacted snow weighing around 450 kg (around 990 lbs) dropping on a tent would do a lot of damage. Think of it this way, imagine the effect of dropping about 50kg (110lbs) from a height of 1-2 metres (3-6 ft) onto someone in a tent. They would have been trapped under the snow in a collapsed tent, so the only way to get out would be to cut the tent. This had the effect of destroying their protection from the cold. It is unlikely they would have been able to find their gear in the tent, and would have been afraid that more of the slope could detach and form a full-sized avalanche. The rest of what happened was probably due in part to panic and effects of hypothermia affecting their ability to make appropriate decisions.
Except that they were experienced hikers. They would never place a tent in an unsafe location like that. Also no one ever since the accident managed to reproduce the slap event naturally, even if there are photos how exactly the tent was placed.
@@mwont 1) It is a gentle slope, so cutting the notch would have seemed safe, 2) People make mistakes, especially if they are tired, hungry, and cold, and 3) The Swiss replicated this exact same scenario.
This was the narrative which the official investigators wanted the public to believe. Can we even be sure that the photographs of the incident's aftermath were authentic in the first place?
Also, will there be an episode on the trial of Adolf Eichmann in Israel? I'd be interested to know how the U.S. and the Soviets responded to it. Thanks.
Also, it would be good if this channel used recorded excerpts from old newsreels, such as the British pathe' archives. Or old radio broadcasts. It would add a "live" touch to this series.
What i never understand is why people go into conspiracy theories with a limp dick. It was a UFO/Soviet deal gone wrong. Dyatlov was clearly a well versed occultist, employed by the soviet bureau of mystics to use his ESP in UFO research. He was tasked to lead an expedition for the annual exchange of technology between the two parties, hence the connection to the nuclear materials. The CIA was well aware of the soviets getting advanced technology from aliens, hence Zolotarev was used as a mole inside the KGB. When they arrived to the campsite to prepare for the secret meeting scheduled tomorrow in the middle of the pass one of the inpatient UFO operative approached them. Little did the human party know the aliens had their own Cold War happening at the same time so their own secret team was fractured and one of them tried to cut out the others from the deal. When Dyatlov sensed something was terrible wrong his mental echo alerted every alien in the vicinity and they acted quickly, first liquidating their own traitor than fleeing in a rush, causing the unexplainable burns, the avalanche and strange lights of the night sky. The sudden change of events and the sheer shock from it caused Dyatlov to go psychotic and sensing subterfuge he first attacked Zolotarev. This activated the CIA planted killswitch planted secretly inside him, even unknown to the carrier which pumped his body full with combat drugs making the failed operative go berserk. The two turned into mad animals and killed each other while mortally wounding or forcing other party members into unsurvivable conditions. Obviously the Soviet Union covered this up.
It has, but it is also pretty much dead and buried as a theory, because if the injuries took place by the tent, the victims would have no way entered in the ravine, close to a kilometer from the spot. The injuries were deadly, and the footprints by the tent shows nobody was caaried or dragged.
This story is more bizarre than the Netflix series “Stranger Things “ My personal theory is that they were attacked by communist zombie vampires sent from space to colonize Russia, but their plan was foiled by….. to be continued ✋🏻
Haha 😂 yeah okay mate, how did you come up with that idea, I think you need to stop reading those silly story books myself. There only one thing that could’ve done something like this and unfortunately that is the human being.
Nah, it is actually very easy to solve! I solved this case a long time ago and put a video on RUclips. In it I show all the details and all the necessary evidence. I analyzed the photos of the Dyatlov group and enlarged them using the latest technology (non-destructive). In addition, I show many hints that have not yet been noticed by anyone. If you are interested, you can access the first part of my video documentation via the following link: ruclips.net/video/5uewNpu0cD0/видео.html P.S.: By the way, it was a nuclear test with an R-7 ICBM, the explosive force was 1.6 megatons and the detonation took place almost exactly 27.5 km away from the group, which is still sufficient for third-degree burns and the blast wave at this distance also fits exactly on the injury pattern of the members of the Dyatlov group.
One thing I remembered about some of the promises you made in one movie. Namely, you were supposed to continue the story of the space rivalry between the USSR and the USA. When I take these stories further, I really like watching your channel because you have much more interesting information than in my country on the subject of the Cold War?
The Swiss study, i.e. the slab avalanche one did simulations of avalanches using software developed for which movie? Disney's Frozen of course. Seems strange bit it is entirely logical that they would have developed this software for a movie about snow.
The behaviour of the hikers became irrational. think about it: 1) they build a small deposit of provisions and they leave behind a pair of skis (there were no spare skis) that means that one of them walked one Km from the deposit to the tent. why? and the next morning that person had to walk back to the deposit to retrieve his skis? it makes no sense. 2) a ski stick was found cut in the tent. why? why would they do that. ? 3) suddenly they start cutting the canvas of the tent with knives. that canvas is NOT easy to cut, and they needed several attempts to finnaly cut it. there were many cuts along the tent, as if all of them started to cut their way out, ignoring the two exits on each side of the tent. why??? this makes no sense at all 4) they leave the tent, and they walk out without boots into the snow. without gloves, without shoes, without coats..... why? 5) they gather in a group and they walk downhill with 9 sets of footprints walking as if they were in a trance. why? 6) Only 2 of them had boots, the other 7 were barefoot or wearing socks (one had only one boot ). isn't that irrational? 7) NONE were wearing gloves. One of them had a pair of gloves in a pocket of his coat, but he did not use them. WHY ????? Everything started to go wrong in the STORAGE HOUSE. Suddenly they leave behind a pair of skis (remember they had no extra skis), and they make a wrong turn towards the Kholat Syakhl, 1500 meters away, instead of going to the mountain pass, which is the logical route. They took that wrong turn, eight of them in skis, and one of them walking. How is that possible? Why they didn't say: hey what are you doing? go pick your skis. Whatever happened, started in the Storage House, after that, it looks like they were in some kind of a trance, making strange uncomprehensible decisions My opinion is that they were under the influence of a hallucinating drug.They were university students, and had contact with other chemistry students. Maybe they took LSD and Meth. That is the only thing that can explain their irrational behavior. The official soviet autopsies reveal no drugs in the bodies. But I can imagine the soviet government censoring that fact. It was 1957. They could not reveal that 9 young soviet students were dead because of drugs. Drug use among young people was a characteristic of capitalist countries
Can you do one on the development of the birth control pill, and specifically, what alternatives were used in the Eastern Bloc? Also, how did they impact women's Liberation in the 60s and 70s?
@@Game_Hero it would be good as well, if this channel used recorded excerpts from old newsreels such as British Pathe ' or old radio broadcasts; this wound add a 'live" touch to this series.
I thought it was already established, that the people were exposed to CO2, generated by the heater and the stove + alcohol. After ripping out the tents and becoming disoriented outside, they got hypothermia, with some ripping out their clothes, which is also a common thing that people in that condition do. Soft tissue, such as tongue, decomposes much quicker than the rest of the body, which is why they were missing. The addition of Zolotarev would've made sense as he as a War veteran, was the most experienced of them all. It is a cool story to tell at a camp sight at night, but just like with all urban myths, the reality is far more mundane.
either co2 or a slap of snow caving in their tent. either way i agree, the reality of what happened is a lot more explainable than people like to believe
Able to explain the radioactivity found on the deceased's body and clothing? There's nothing mundane about this incident, that's why it still grips us till this day ...
@@trizvanov No it was a nuclear test with an R-7 ICBM, the explosive force was 1.6 megatons and the detonation took place almost exactly 27.5 km away from the group, which is still sufficient for third-degree burns and the blast wave at this distance also fits exactly on the injury pattern of the members of the Dyatlov group. ! I solved this case a long time ago and put a video on RUclips. In it I show all the details and all the necessary evidence. I analyzed the photos of the Dyatlov group and enlarged them using the latest technology (non-destructive). In addition, I show many hints that have not yet been noticed by anyone. If you are interested, you can access the first part of my video documentation via the following link: ruclips.net/video/5uewNpu0cD0/видео.html
@@patrichausammann There are no recorded ICBM tests in the Kholat Syakhl at the time. The first modified R7 that was capable of carrying nuclear payload wasn't even operational until 1961 and those before that were tested in Plesetsk, which is over a 1000km from where the incident took place. In other words, stop making stuff up.
LEMINO has done a pretty good video on this topic here on RUclips. I like his conclusion that it may have been their makeshift stove in their tent that relit from an ember after they removed the exhaust-pipe for the night. This caused smoke inhalation in the group leading to panic and confusion as they left the tent in a hurry, only to be separated and lost at night in a snowstorm, tired, partially drunk, and without clothing.
Yes, that seems to be the most likely course of events. The collapse of the tent itsef was due to people scrambling to get out. What all of the conspiracy theorists tend to ignore, is that people die under similar circumstances every year.
@@simplymadness8849 This wasn't just "some smoke". People were exposed to the fumes for quite some time and when awaken, got out as quickly as they could. They were also, for all intents and purposes, intoxicated from alcohol.
I uploaded the complete solution to the Dyatlov Pass case on RUclips a long time ago. There I go into the whole story in detail and present all the necessary evidence. I also show where the described as "strong force" came from and what it was exactly. I also show how much energy was released during the incident. But that's not all, because I've enlarged many images with the latest technology (non-destructive) and I've even compared the registers of the YAK aircraft works and can thereby prove that an excessive number of aircraft (military aircraft) have crashed in this area. By the way, the avalanche theory is very easy to refute! There was no massed snow on the tent, the footprints from the tent towards ravine were not buried. In addition, the gradient on the slope at the tent was only about 20% (probability of an avalanche with this gradient is only about 2%) and the tent was only set up about 400 meters below the summit. The injury picture of the members of the Dyatlov group also does not match that of an avalanche! Incidentally, I've never heard of naturally occurring radioactive avalanches 😉. For those who are interested, here is the link to the first part of my video documentation: ruclips.net/video/5uewNpu0cD0/видео.html
Thank you for the "History channel after midnight" reference lol. I've never heard of this incident before, but it sounds like an awful mess whatever the case. Stay well out there everybody, and God bless you, friends. ✝️ :)
Interesting episode.But can you focus little more on actual Cold War themes please?I feel like channel is starting to drift lately to something like "Stuff that happened in 1945. - 1990. period channel"
Think I must concur here, while interesting there is so much else that needs coverage as well. For example, the Vietnam war is likely to be a massive, multi video topic and while I'm sure it's coming just seems like we should get into it so as to not save so much for later we never get around to it...
This did play into the Cold War with some of a former SMERSH guy being part of the group, the supposed high levels of radiation, etc. It was really a mystery for years with a lot of theories based on intrigue in the Soviet Union.
There is a game called 'Kholat' that's based on this event. It's a decent game if you like creepy and weird first-person exploration / survival games. No spoilers, but it goes all in with a supernatural theme. Play it at night with the lights off. 🥶
I'm glad there's a forced link to a Wikipedia article on this subject given how, from what it seems, it's a topic plagued with conspiracy theories and crazy ideas.
Little surprised you didn't mention Donnie Eichar and his book Dead Mountain. He was the only investigator who met a survivor and personally visited the site. Donnie came up with interesting theory.
It's always seemed to me that they were a little too close to a bomb test, it knocked their tent down, scared the shit out of everybody and they ran out into the wilderness and froze to death
You are correct! I solved this case a long time ago and put a video on RUclips ( ruclips.net/video/5uewNpu0cD0/видео.html ). In it I show all the details and all the necessary evidence. I analyzed the photos of the Dyatlov group and enlarged them using the latest technology (non-destructive). In addition, I show many hints that have not yet been noticed by anyone. The cause of death of the group members was a nuclear test with an R-7 ICBM, the yield was 1.6 megatons, and the detonation took place almost exactly 27.5 km from the group, which is still enough for third-degree burns from the explosion and the distance from the explosion and its blast wave also fits the injury pattern of the members of the Dyatlov group!
A theory I'm fond of is that a fight broke, probably between Dyatlov and Yuri K, both of whom had dated Zina. Not necessarily a fight over, but tensions boiling over on cold unpleasant night. Yuri K leaves, heads downhill thinking he can survive and the other Yuri goes with him. Zina Dyatlov and Rustem follow later to find them. Then the Rav 4 come down later.
The only thing that could’ve done something like this is unfortunately, the human being, either that or a avalanche but, I honestly can’t see how a avalanche created some of the injuries that were on the bodies of the dead, if it had been any kind of animals flesh would’ve been eaten, so I think people need to look towards the human being.
There is a good movie called Devil's Pass which details a new group of hikers going on the original route to try to discover what happened when they are met with a force they cannot fight. But in either case I believe they saw something they shouldn't have and the government killed them
I’m listening to an audiobook about this event, and I’d say the Swiss theory is what happened. Only thing I could think of is that someone mistakenly believed their lives were in danger and fled the tent. Such a small scale avalanche at night could easily explain their hasty exit
@Christopher Lutz First of all, I'm Swiss myself, but I have to disagree, the Swiss ETH scientists are definitely wrong! Had it been an avalanche everyone would have been buried and the tent would have been covered with snow. However, there were only loose clumps of snow on the tent. The ski stick and the skis in front of the tent were still there and the tent was not carried away either. Why would several people have burns on their faces and the backs of their hands? Several group members only had burns on the outside of their hands, but none on the inside. What is that supposed to be from, the oven? No, definitely not, because it could be locked (standard Soviet military tent oven). Why would the group run away from the tent after an avalanche? Because it burned? No, that was not the reason, which you can clearly see from the pictures of the tent. There were no burn marks on the tent. If the tent was only sparsely covered with clumps of snow, why not set it up again at least makeshift, e.g. with the skis and the aforementioned ski pole? After all, the oven was still there (which, by the way, was off when the accident happened! Why should the group flee in the opposite direction of civilization into the valley after an avalanche is said to have come down? They ended up migrating from the other side to their campsite from the southeast and not from the northeast, where the "escape route" led. The traces indicated that the people must have moved relatively quickly? Why should one do this when the avalanche has already come down? Was it only part of the group that managed to run away from the avalanche? No, this can't be either, because that would be another point that wouldn't make sense, would it? In such a case, the tracks should have been filled with snow from the avalanche. Why hadn't the tracks in the snow been covered by the avalanche and found even after three months? After the avalanche, there was no possibility of another avalanche, so there was no reason to run away. Remember, the group was only 300 meters below the summit. In addition, according to avalanche research institutes, the possibility of an avalanche on a slope like the one the group was on, which is only 15 degrees, is almost impossible. This is also confirmed on the Red Bull Sports website. Only from 20 degrees there is a slight possibility for wet snow avalanches. According to the weather report, it was too cold for a wet snow avalanche at the Dyatlov Fall. The frequency of slab avalanches only increases from an incline of around 30 degrees. Incidentally, it is not just that the incline, the pattern of destruction, the injuries, the behavior of the group, the tracks in the snow and the changes in the landscape and vegetation do not fit the avalanche theory. But also the radioactivity, the testimonies and the last pictures of the group do not fit this theory. In addition, the time I determined for the incident also does not correspond to an avalanche. Incidentally, there have already been people who tried to trigger an avalanche on the said slope with various means, even with fireworks. However, no one has succeeded, although I doubt anyone will ever. Why was radioactivity measured on the group's clothing? Why was increased radioactivity also measured in the organs of the group members? Why is increased radioactivity still being measured on the Dyatlov Pass? Questions over questions, I know. But I've already looked into it all and solved the case. If you are interested, you can watch my documentaries on YT. I go into all the points and explain what it really was that led to the death of the group using various pieces of evidence, circumstantial evidence, image enlargements, aerial photographs, animations and witness statements. The last pictures that the group shot are the nail in the coffin, which is evidenced both by the testimonies and the changes in the landscape on the aerial photographs. I was even able to narrow down the exact time of death to +/- 20 minutes. But that's not all. Because I also found out what the weird tattoo on Zolotaryov's arm actually is. I can also prove that many more people died in the same area that same morning (side note: rather unlikely time for an avalanche as well). As already written you can see my work. I really go into everything, although I will only publish the exact time of death in part 3, which is still in progress. I'm sure you won't regret looking at it.
@@patrichausammann There was a hurricane or storm that caused loud sound and caused panic. -30 to - 60 degree winds did the rest of the job. No clue why you would set up a tent on a flat mountain ridge when you got a forest close by ?
@@mathiashammar1 The problem is that I've already considered all the data and checked it multiple times. The wind mentioned in the weather reports came from the northwest. The strong short gust of wind came from the east. As I said, I considered all possibilities, checked all witness statements, evaluated the photos of the group members and the search teams, but also aerial photos, and included the various radioactive measurements in my research and much more. In addition, all calculations that I have carried out speak for my theory. I even calculated all the facts into Bayes' probability and came up with a 99.9999999 percent probability that I am right (and yes, that's 7 digits after the decimal point 😉). There's nothing I haven't thought of. Edit: Your question as to why a tent was set up on a mountain ridge instead of in a forest towards the valley is easy to answer, since it was important to have the widest possible view in order to carry out observations for a secret mission.😉
@@mathiashammar1 Addendum: They were experienced hikers who had completed several such trips. In addition, according to the International Avalanche Research Institute, an avalanche can be ruled out in this terrain (slope of only 15 degrees). Another point is that in a storm in this area with such a small incline you can rule out such injuries as so many broken bones, even fractured skulls! One must also remember that there are neither natural radioactive avalanches nor storms! During the autopsy, radioactive levels of over 4,000 CPM were measured on the internal organs of the group members. These values are extremely high and one can completely rule out all natural reasons for this! However, I explain all this in great detail in my videos. P.S.: I was in the military myself and was at an altitude of over 1,700 meters even in winter, with the temperature during the day being minus 19 degrees, I don’t even want to talk about the temperatures at night.🥶 That means I have some experience with such situations myself.
They actually game across the very rare Russian Sasquatch who had just landed in their spaceship for their annual Balalaika. Since these hairy beasts sell secrets to both the KGB and CIA, their existence must be kept secret.
Hi ROB, N01, every crop circle leaves one thing on the ground, Radiation. N02, mutilations of animals have been going on for 50years, we know who's to blame and every thing is covered over, UFO's don't exist ???? Duh. Aliens have visited Earth over 270 million years ago. N03, it was 4 months before they found the last ones, 8 miles away , not 2. Tried to hide below, really scared, brutally killed. Still happening, dear oh dear. All the best from Australia.
The slab avalanche explanation seems to be the most likely also just so you know "dark five" just did a piece on a similar incident with five mentally challenged young men in California back in the seventies
I thought it was related to the combined effects of air dropped mines being tested in the area and the disorientation caused by the unusual winds found in the area. They would not have lasted long in that environment and the rapid onset of hypothermia.
They got hit by some sort of soviet bomb test by accidents I assume. Would expalin lights, burn marks, concussion from blast wave, and the quick cover up
Folks, FOLKS- think this through....that tent eould not have withstood an avalanche not the skies which they supposedly used to help pitch the tent- 2 months later when they finally located them, any avalanche would have creamed that tent! I doubt it was even their tent st all but rather planted there!
I think it was a case of an avalanche or snow slide hitting the tent, causing them to panic and cut their way out of the tent. Disoriented and scattered, they succumbed to the elements.
I HAVE THE ANSWER TO THIS!!! There is root that grows in that area that russkies take. It's like "Bath Salts" and thusly the same behavior is displayed! A bag of the same "herb" was found on the hikers who died there in the 50's (?). Please SOMEONE research this "herb" and report back. Thanks
There is no mystery. Hikers messed up setting tent and got swept by an avalanche. There are plenty of examples where experienced hikers messed up from all over the world.
What does this have to do with the cold war? I feel like at this pace the channel will take 5 years to show what happened in Cold war in the 70s and the host will retire before they cover the 80s.
There's a much less well known, but similar incident that also took place in 1993. Khamar Darban was an instance where a group of hikers were making their way through mountains in Western Siberia, close to Mongolia, and died under mysterious circumstances. Only difference is there was an eyewitness survivor, a 17 year old girl who was part of the group. She reported that most died of exposure, but under weird circumstances like trying to rip their clothes off and even banging their heads against rocks, almost like a bout of insanity that overtook them. However, due to the remoteness of the location, it was 3.5 weeks before rescuers could make it up there, so decomposition had affected the bodies pretty badly. Lots of theories ranging from poisoned food to infrasound resulting from a freak storm that hit them, but interesting incident nonetheless. There's a video on RUclips covering it but aside from that very little except some Russian translations from the early 1990s. The sole survivor changed her name, moved away and has refused all requests for interviews.
It could’ve been from HAPE (High altitude Pulmonary edema) and HACE (High altitude cerebral edema). Mixed with hypothermia, and you’ll go insane. Plus, there’s ways for ‘infections’ to be spread amongst one another, so that would explain the shared hypothermia, and mania.
So what's the similarity? You just wrote what you've heard on the internet and you have no clue about it. The survivor gave an interview. Your username really fits you
@@mr.pissedoff1903 Psychedelic drugs + exposure?
@@megamond I doubt it, they would’ve been found with it still in their blood. Still, if you’re doing phychedelics, you’re not gonna go retarded. It doesn’t really affect decision making, either.
@@mr.pissedoff1903 In the case of the Dyatlov group, however, it wasn't HAPE, which is easy to prove! Because the summit of the Kholatchakhl is only at 1,096.7 m (3,598 ft). This level is not high enough to trigger HAPE. During my service in the military, I've been to much higher mountains several times, with temperatures sometimes hovering around -20 degrees Celsius for days. Incidentally, no one died, but there was one case in my company in which a soldier lost toes because of the cold and carelessness.
The aged Yuri Yudin, the sole survivor of the team, had done a video interview. In it he stated that he doubted the official investigation report about the death of his friends and he believed that the government was somehow involved. Before he passed away, he had asked to be buried in the same place as his friends.
17:50 It would not have needed to be what we consider to be an avalanche. Not a wall of snow barreling down the slope, but rather a relatively small slab of compacted snow.
When they pitched their tent on the slope, they cut out the snow to create a flat area to pitch the tent on. This created a deep notch in the slope. The "avalanche" would have been a block of snow (probably a 3 m wide by 3 m long by 1 metre high = 9 cubic metres) detaching from the slope above the tent, falling into the notch and dropping onto the hikers. A cubic metre/yard of snow weighs a fair bit (50 kg), so a "small" slab of compacted snow weighing around 450 kg (around 990 lbs) dropping on a tent would do a lot of damage. Think of it this way, imagine the effect of dropping about 50kg (110lbs) from a height of 1-2 metres (3-6 ft) onto someone in a tent.
They would have been trapped under the snow in a collapsed tent, so the only way to get out would be to cut the tent. This had the effect of destroying their protection from the cold. It is unlikely they would have been able to find their gear in the tent, and would have been afraid that more of the slope could detach and form a full-sized avalanche. The rest of what happened was probably due in part to panic and effects of hypothermia affecting their ability to make appropriate decisions.
yes!
Except that they were experienced hikers. They would never place a tent in an unsafe location like that.
Also no one ever since the accident managed to reproduce the slap event naturally, even if there are photos how exactly the tent was placed.
@@mwont
1) It is a gentle slope, so cutting the notch would have seemed safe,
2) People make mistakes, especially if they are tired, hungry, and cold, and
3) The Swiss replicated this exact same scenario.
@@nicholasconder4703 The swiss forced the slab to occur. It was not done naturally.
This was the narrative which the official investigators wanted the public to believe. Can we even be sure that the photographs of the incident's aftermath were authentic in the first place?
Also, will there be an episode on the trial of Adolf Eichmann in Israel? I'd be interested to know how the U.S. and the Soviets responded to it. Thanks.
Nobody liked Mossad snatching people from other countries, but they couldn’t say anything about it for fear of being labeled an antisemite.
@@uncleTedK trying and hanging a known mass murderer? Everyone likes that. Except neo Nazis.
Also, it would be good if this channel used recorded excerpts from old newsreels, such as the British pathe' archives. Or old radio broadcasts. It would add a "live" touch to this series.
It's a modern tragedy that the state of Israel exists at all.
@@citizensnips7949 yeah because racists and antisemites like you get your arses kicked by the IDF.
The slab avalanche theory has the most physical and circumstantial evidence behind it.
What i never understand is why people go into conspiracy theories with a limp dick. It was a UFO/Soviet deal gone wrong. Dyatlov was clearly a well versed occultist, employed by the soviet bureau of mystics to use his ESP in UFO research. He was tasked to lead an expedition for the annual exchange of technology between the two parties, hence the connection to the nuclear materials. The CIA was well aware of the soviets getting advanced technology from aliens, hence Zolotarev was used as a mole inside the KGB.
When they arrived to the campsite to prepare for the secret meeting scheduled tomorrow in the middle of the pass one of the inpatient UFO operative approached them. Little did the human party know the aliens had their own Cold War happening at the same time so their own secret team was fractured and one of them tried to cut out the others from the deal. When Dyatlov sensed something was terrible wrong his mental echo alerted every alien in the vicinity and they acted quickly, first liquidating their own traitor than fleeing in a rush, causing the unexplainable burns, the avalanche and strange lights of the night sky.
The sudden change of events and the sheer shock from it caused Dyatlov to go psychotic and sensing subterfuge he first attacked Zolotarev. This activated the CIA planted killswitch planted secretly inside him, even unknown to the carrier which pumped his body full with combat drugs making the failed operative go berserk. The two turned into mad animals and killed each other while mortally wounding or forcing other party members into unsurvivable conditions. Obviously the Soviet Union covered this up.
It has, but it is also pretty much dead and buried as a theory, because if the injuries took place by the tent, the victims would have no way entered in the ravine, close to a kilometer from the spot. The injuries were deadly, and the footprints by the tent shows nobody was caaried or dragged.
I'm not saying it was aliens, but...
That's it, I'm just saying it isn't aliens
Well played sir
This story is more bizarre than the Netflix series “Stranger Things “ My personal theory is that they were attacked by communist zombie vampires sent from space to colonize Russia, but their plan was foiled by….. to be continued ✋🏻
Nonsense. Communist zombie vampires would never assault proper comrades working for the glory of the Party.
They had to be fascist zombie vampires.
Haha 😂 yeah okay mate, how did you come up with that idea, I think you need to stop reading those silly story books myself. There only one thing that could’ve done something like this and unfortunately that is the human being.
Nah, it is actually very easy to solve! I solved this case a long time ago and put a video on RUclips. In it I show all the details and all the necessary evidence. I analyzed the photos of the Dyatlov group and enlarged them using the latest technology (non-destructive). In addition, I show many hints that have not yet been noticed by anyone.
If you are interested, you can access the first part of my video documentation via the following link: ruclips.net/video/5uewNpu0cD0/видео.html
P.S.: By the way, it was a nuclear test with an R-7 ICBM, the explosive force was 1.6 megatons and the detonation took place almost exactly 27.5 km away from the group, which is still sufficient for third-degree burns and the blast wave at this distance also fits exactly on the injury pattern of the members of the Dyatlov group.
Great stuff, I think this will go down to be one of the definitive videos on Dylatov pass incident.
One thing I remembered about some of the promises you made in one movie. Namely, you were supposed to continue the story of the space rivalry between the USSR and the USA. When I take these stories further, I really like watching your channel because you have much more interesting information than in my country on the subject of the Cold War?
I like that there are 16 likes to the video within the first 20 seconds of publication. Such is our faith that it will be good!
My friend, have you ever been let down?
Russians remembering the Good Old Days
The Swiss study, i.e. the slab avalanche one did simulations of avalanches using software developed for which movie? Disney's Frozen of course. Seems strange bit it is entirely logical that they would have developed this software for a movie about snow.
I really appreciate the animation of this video. Give us more of that.
The behaviour of the hikers became irrational. think about it:
1) they build a small deposit of provisions and they leave behind a pair of skis (there were no spare skis) that means that one of them walked one Km from the deposit to the tent. why? and the next morning that person had to walk back to the deposit to retrieve his skis? it makes no sense.
2) a ski stick was found cut in the tent. why? why would they do that. ?
3) suddenly they start cutting the canvas of the tent with knives. that canvas is NOT easy to cut, and they needed several attempts to finnaly cut it. there were many cuts along the tent, as if all of them started to cut their way out, ignoring the two exits on each side of the tent. why??? this makes no sense at all
4) they leave the tent, and they walk out without boots into the snow. without gloves, without shoes, without coats..... why?
5) they gather in a group and they walk downhill with 9 sets of footprints walking as if they were in a trance. why?
6) Only 2 of them had boots, the other 7 were barefoot or wearing socks (one had only one boot ). isn't that irrational?
7) NONE were wearing gloves. One of them had a pair of gloves in a pocket of his coat, but he did not use them. WHY ?????
Everything started to go wrong in the STORAGE HOUSE. Suddenly they leave behind a pair of skis (remember they had no extra skis), and they make a wrong turn towards the Kholat Syakhl, 1500 meters away, instead of going to the mountain pass, which is the logical route. They took that wrong turn, eight of them in skis, and one of them walking. How is that possible? Why they didn't say: hey what are you doing? go pick your skis. Whatever happened, started in the Storage House, after that, it looks like they were in some kind of a trance, making strange uncomprehensible decisions
My opinion is that they were under the influence of a hallucinating drug.They were university students, and had contact with other chemistry students. Maybe they took LSD and Meth. That is the only thing that can explain their irrational behavior. The official soviet autopsies reveal no drugs in the bodies. But I can imagine the soviet government censoring that fact. It was 1957. They could not reveal that 9 young soviet students were dead because of drugs. Drug use among young people was a characteristic of capitalist countries
Can you do one on the development of the birth control pill, and specifically, what alternatives were used in the Eastern Bloc? Also, how did they impact women's Liberation in the 60s and 70s?
Good idea. I'm really curious about less talked about subjects like these.
@@Game_Hero it would be good as well, if this channel used recorded excerpts from old newsreels such as British Pathe ' or old radio broadcasts; this wound add a 'live" touch to this series.
@@deshaun9473 I think this might be due to copyright reasons. It's still proprietary material not part of public domain for the most case.
I thought it was already established, that the people were exposed to CO2, generated by the heater and the stove + alcohol. After ripping out the tents and becoming disoriented outside, they got hypothermia, with some ripping out their clothes, which is also a common thing that people in that condition do.
Soft tissue, such as tongue, decomposes much quicker than the rest of the body, which is why they were missing.
The addition of Zolotarev would've made sense as he as a War veteran, was the most experienced of them all.
It is a cool story to tell at a camp sight at night, but just like with all urban myths, the reality is far more mundane.
either co2 or a slap of snow caving in their tent. either way i agree, the reality of what happened is a lot more explainable than people like to believe
Able to explain the radioactivity found on the deceased's body and clothing? There's nothing mundane about this incident, that's why it still grips us till this day ...
@@silentbliss7666 Thorium used in gas lanterns.
@@trizvanov No it was a nuclear test with an R-7 ICBM, the explosive force was 1.6 megatons and the detonation took place almost exactly 27.5 km away from the group, which is still sufficient for third-degree burns and the blast wave at this distance also fits exactly on the injury pattern of the members of the Dyatlov group. ! I solved this case a long time ago and put a video on RUclips. In it I show all the details and all the necessary evidence. I analyzed the photos of the Dyatlov group and enlarged them using the latest technology (non-destructive). In addition, I show many hints that have not yet been noticed by anyone.
If you are interested, you can access the first part of my video documentation via the following link: ruclips.net/video/5uewNpu0cD0/видео.html
@@patrichausammann There are no recorded ICBM tests in the Kholat Syakhl at the time.
The first modified R7 that was capable of carrying nuclear payload wasn't even operational until 1961 and those before that were tested in Plesetsk, which is over a 1000km from where the incident took place.
In other words, stop making stuff up.
Lemmino, a RUclipsr has an amazing video documentary on this
LEMINO has done a pretty good video on this topic here on RUclips. I like his conclusion that it may have been their makeshift stove in their tent that relit from an ember after they removed the exhaust-pipe for the night. This caused smoke inhalation in the group leading to panic and confusion as they left the tent in a hurry, only to be separated and lost at night in a snowstorm, tired, partially drunk, and without clothing.
Still leaves much to be explained as to what happened to the bodies
The stove was found in the tent disassembled so that theory can be ruled out entirely.
Yes, that seems to be the most likely course of events. The collapse of the tent itsef was due to people scrambling to get out.
What all of the conspiracy theorists tend to ignore, is that people die under similar circumstances every year.
@@trizvanov People do not abandon their campsites to walk a mile down hill in their undergarments and with no shoes on because of some smoke.
@@simplymadness8849 This wasn't just "some smoke". People were exposed to the fumes for quite some time and when awaken, got out as quickly as they could.
They were also, for all intents and purposes, intoxicated from alcohol.
Thanks
Another nice example to add to my very very long list of why I don't trust the government......
I uploaded the complete solution to the Dyatlov Pass case on RUclips a long time ago. There I go into the whole story in detail and present all the necessary evidence.
I also show where the described as "strong force" came from and what it was exactly. I also show how much energy was released during the incident. But that's not all, because I've enlarged many images with the latest technology (non-destructive) and I've even compared the registers of the YAK aircraft works and can thereby prove that an excessive number of aircraft (military aircraft) have crashed in this area.
By the way, the avalanche theory is very easy to refute! There was no massed snow on the tent, the footprints from the tent towards ravine were not buried. In addition, the gradient on the slope at the tent was only about 20% (probability of an avalanche with this gradient is only about 2%) and the tent was only set up about 400 meters below the summit. The injury picture of the members of the Dyatlov group also does not match that of an avalanche! Incidentally, I've never heard of naturally occurring radioactive avalanches 😉.
For those who are interested, here is the link to the first part of my video documentation: ruclips.net/video/5uewNpu0cD0/видео.html
Thank you for the "History channel after midnight" reference lol. I've never heard of this incident before, but it sounds like an awful mess whatever the case.
Stay well out there everybody, and God bless you, friends. ✝️ :)
Interesting episode.But can you focus little more on actual Cold War themes please?I feel like channel is starting to drift lately to something like "Stuff that happened in 1945. - 1990. period channel"
Think I must concur here, while interesting there is so much else that needs coverage as well. For example, the Vietnam war is likely to be a massive, multi video topic and while I'm sure it's coming just seems like we should get into it so as to not save so much for later we never get around to it...
This did play into the Cold War with some of a former SMERSH guy being part of the group, the supposed high levels of radiation, etc. It was really a mystery for years with a lot of theories based on intrigue in the Soviet Union.
Well, stuff that happened is a big part of the Cold war, social and cultural things especially.
There is a game called 'Kholat' that's based on this event. It's a decent game if you like creepy and weird first-person exploration / survival games. No spoilers, but it goes all in with a supernatural theme. Play it at night with the lights off. 🥶
I loved it - might have to reinstall it for another playthrough when fall comes around :)
15:52 shows it was time traveling CIA agents from at least the late 80’s because they apparently had a Glock pistol.
I'm glad there's a forced link to a Wikipedia article on this subject given how, from what it seems, it's a topic plagued with conspiracy theories and crazy ideas.
Thanks for the survey of various theories. I would have liked your comments on the photo of the mysterious creature/human.
Little surprised you didn't mention Donnie Eichar and his book Dead Mountain. He was the only investigator who met a survivor and personally visited the site. Donnie came up with interesting theory.
It's always seemed to me that they were a little too close to a bomb test, it knocked their tent down, scared the shit out of everybody and they ran out into the wilderness and froze to death
I agree, nothing else explains the extra radiation.
You are correct! I solved this case a long time ago and put a video on RUclips ( ruclips.net/video/5uewNpu0cD0/видео.html ). In it I show all the details and all the necessary evidence. I analyzed the photos of the Dyatlov group and enlarged them using the latest technology (non-destructive). In addition, I show many hints that have not yet been noticed by anyone.
The cause of death of the group members was a nuclear test with an R-7 ICBM, the yield was 1.6 megatons, and the detonation took place almost exactly 27.5 km from the group, which is still enough for third-degree burns from the explosion and the distance from the explosion and its blast wave also fits the injury pattern of the members of the Dyatlov group!
Bedtime Stories has covered this but I still want to hear others covering this incident.
3.6.. Not great, not terrible.
You are clearly delusional take him to the infirmary.
A theory I'm fond of is that a fight broke, probably between Dyatlov and Yuri K, both of whom had dated Zina. Not necessarily a fight over, but tensions boiling over on cold unpleasant night. Yuri K leaves, heads downhill thinking he can survive and the other Yuri goes with him. Zina Dyatlov and Rustem follow later to find them. Then the Rav 4 come down later.
The key is that you have to disorient them. Otherwise they just go back inside and stitch up the tent. That's why snowslide seems unlikely to me.
The only thing that could’ve done something like this is unfortunately, the human being, either that or a avalanche but, I honestly can’t see how a avalanche created some of the injuries that were on the bodies of the dead, if it had been any kind of animals flesh would’ve been eaten, so I think people need to look towards the human being.
We know what happened...👽🛸
Exactly
Nazca lines mahabarata
Yeti
I'm sorry but having lived in the mountains with 200 inches of snow yearly. I think an avalance hit their tent which would mimic a bad car crash!
A truly sinister mistery.
There is a good movie called Devil's Pass which details a new group of hikers going on the original route to try to discover what happened when they are met with a force they cannot fight. But in either case I believe they saw something they shouldn't have and the government killed them
I’m listening to an audiobook about this event, and I’d say the Swiss theory is what happened. Only thing I could think of is that someone mistakenly believed their lives were in danger and fled the tent. Such a small scale avalanche at night could easily explain their hasty exit
@Christopher Lutz First of all, I'm Swiss myself, but I have to disagree, the Swiss ETH scientists are definitely wrong!
Had it been an avalanche everyone would have been buried and the tent would have been covered with snow. However, there were only loose clumps of snow on the tent. The ski stick and the skis in front of the tent were still there and the tent was not carried away either. Why would several people have burns on their faces and the backs of their hands? Several group members only had burns on the outside of their hands, but none on the inside. What is that supposed to be from, the oven? No, definitely not, because it could be locked (standard Soviet military tent oven). Why would the group run away from the tent after an avalanche? Because it burned? No, that was not the reason, which you can clearly see from the pictures of the tent. There were no burn marks on the tent.
If the tent was only sparsely covered with clumps of snow, why not set it up again at least makeshift, e.g. with the skis and the aforementioned ski pole? After all, the oven was still there (which, by the way, was off when the accident happened!
Why should the group flee in the opposite direction of civilization into the valley after an avalanche is said to have come down? They ended up migrating from the other side to their campsite from the southeast and not from the northeast, where the "escape route" led.
The traces indicated that the people must have moved relatively quickly? Why should one do this when the avalanche has already come down? Was it only part of the group that managed to run away from the avalanche? No, this can't be either, because that would be another point that wouldn't make sense, would it? In such a case, the tracks should have been filled with snow from the avalanche. Why hadn't the tracks in the snow been covered by the avalanche and found even after three months? After the avalanche, there was no possibility of another avalanche, so there was no reason to run away. Remember, the group was only 300 meters below the summit. In addition, according to avalanche research institutes, the possibility of an avalanche on a slope like the one the group was on, which is only 15 degrees, is almost impossible. This is also confirmed on the Red Bull Sports website.
Only from 20 degrees there is a slight possibility for wet snow avalanches. According to the weather report, it was too cold for a wet snow avalanche at the Dyatlov Fall. The frequency of slab avalanches only increases from an incline of around 30 degrees.
Incidentally, it is not just that the incline, the pattern of destruction, the injuries, the behavior of the group, the tracks in the snow and the changes in the landscape and vegetation do not fit the avalanche theory. But also the radioactivity, the testimonies and the last pictures of the group do not fit this theory. In addition, the time I determined for the incident also does not correspond to an avalanche. Incidentally, there have already been people who tried to trigger an avalanche on the said slope with various means, even with fireworks. However, no one has succeeded, although I doubt anyone will ever.
Why was radioactivity measured on the group's clothing? Why was increased radioactivity also measured in the organs of the group members? Why is increased radioactivity still being measured on the Dyatlov Pass?
Questions over questions, I know. But I've already looked into it all and solved the case. If you are interested, you can watch my documentaries on YT. I go into all the points and explain what it really was that led to the death of the group using various pieces of evidence, circumstantial evidence, image enlargements, aerial photographs, animations and witness statements. The last pictures that the group shot are the nail in the coffin, which is evidenced both by the testimonies and the changes in the landscape on the aerial photographs.
I was even able to narrow down the exact time of death to +/- 20 minutes. But that's not all. Because I also found out what the weird tattoo on Zolotaryov's arm actually is. I can also prove that many more people died in the same area that same morning (side note: rather unlikely time for an avalanche as well).
As already written you can see my work. I really go into everything, although I will only publish the exact time of death in part 3, which is still in progress.
I'm sure you won't regret looking at it.
@@patrichausammann There was a hurricane or storm that caused loud sound and caused panic. -30 to - 60 degree winds did the rest of the job. No clue why you would set up a tent on a flat mountain ridge when you got a forest close by ?
@@mathiashammar1 The problem is that I've already considered all the data and checked it multiple times. The wind mentioned in the weather reports came from the northwest. The strong short gust of wind came from the east. As I said, I considered all possibilities, checked all witness statements, evaluated the photos of the group members and the search teams, but also aerial photos, and included the various radioactive measurements in my research and much more. In addition, all calculations that I have carried out speak for my theory. I even calculated all the facts into Bayes' probability and came up with a 99.9999999 percent probability that I am right (and yes, that's 7 digits after the decimal point 😉). There's nothing I haven't thought of.
Edit: Your question as to why a tent was set up on a mountain ridge instead of in a forest towards the valley is easy to answer, since it was important to have the widest possible view in order to carry out observations for a secret mission.😉
@@mathiashammar1 Addendum: They were experienced hikers who had completed several such trips. In addition, according to the International Avalanche Research Institute, an avalanche can be ruled out in this terrain (slope of only 15 degrees). Another point is that in a storm in this area with such a small incline you can rule out such injuries as so many broken bones, even fractured skulls! One must also remember that there are neither natural radioactive avalanches nor storms! During the autopsy, radioactive levels of over 4,000 CPM were measured on the internal organs of the group members. These values are extremely high and one can completely rule out all natural reasons for this! However, I explain all this in great detail in my videos.
P.S.: I was in the military myself and was at an altitude of over 1,700 meters even in winter, with the temperature during the day being minus 19 degrees, I don’t even want to talk about the temperatures at night.🥶 That means I have some experience with such situations myself.
For those who are able to speak Brazilian Portuguese I highly recommend the documentary about it on Assombrado channel.
Slab of snow my ass. Some wierd stuff took place, and we will never know exactly what unfortunately.
I read that the radioactivity detected might have come from the thorium used in the mantles on the lanterns.
Can you guys talk a bout The US invasion of Panama 1989 (OP Just cause)?
Isnt dyatlov also the name of the senior engineer that blew the chernoyble reactor
The name comes from "Dyatel" - "Woodpecker" and is quite a common name in Russia.
@@trizvanov huh so one could say a woodpecker caused the worlds worst nuclear disaster
Anyone knows what is this thick book on the table?
They actually game across the very rare Russian Sasquatch who had just landed in their spaceship for their annual Balalaika. Since these hairy beasts sell secrets to both the KGB and CIA, their existence must be kept secret.
just lemmino
It’s probably a Yeti
wish you guys did more videos on Yugoslavija
History Channel: Aliens killed em that's for sure 👽
Hi ROB, N01, every crop circle leaves one thing on the ground, Radiation. N02, mutilations of animals have been going on for 50years, we know who's to blame and every thing is covered over, UFO's don't exist ???? Duh. Aliens have visited Earth over 270 million years ago. N03, it was 4 months before they found the last
ones, 8 miles away , not 2. Tried to hide below, really scared, brutally killed.
Still happening, dear oh dear. All the best from Australia.
the sound editing of this episode was a bit whack
History channel at midnight comment was top notch 😂
Sounds like a good grist for a scary movie.
There is actually a somewhat entertaining found footage style horror movie named The Dyatlov Pass Incident.
There is one called devils pass 2014
The slab avalanche explanation seems to be the most likely also just so you know "dark five" just did a piece on a similar incident with five mentally challenged young men in California back in the seventies
Is Dyatlov pass still visit?
You are pigging back on old info this doc is missing important pieces
What keeps an area clear of trees in a forest? Repeated avalanches. Never should have camped on a tree free slope in a forest
Trees would presumably also break up the wind.
Wouldn't a Bear in the camp be a likely cause of the team leaving their tent in a hurry?
I thought it was related to the combined effects of air dropped mines being tested in the area and the disorientation caused by the unusual winds found in the area. They would not have lasted long in that environment and the rapid onset of hypothermia.
They got hit by some sort of soviet bomb test by accidents I assume. Would expalin lights, burn marks, concussion from blast wave, and the quick cover up
For me because of the traumas its UFO,thank you for another great episode
will be published new books on dyatlov pass mysteries''
Not great not terrible.
I'm not sure how, and I'm not sure why, but Eddie Redmayne is somehow responsible....
Avalanche on a snowy mountaintop or fucking aliens.
Which sounds more reasonable to you?
Has the possibility that they consumed a drug that drove them batty ever been ruled out?
So we are all agreed: it was aliens.
Maybe one of them cracked up and dormant psychopathy came to the fore and the rest ran for their lives?🤔
They probably just had a big fight and got lost in the dark.
Reactionary ghosts, or reactionary alians? The dialectic didn't see that coming!
I love me some mysteries
Topics of interest; Soviet connection to Arab/Islamic terror - drug abuse behind Iron Curtain.
What was the picture of a yeti.. You said there is no evidence..Isn't that evidence...
Gonzalo Lirashenko.
The transitions sounds are really annoying and very loud. Over edited. Less is better. ❤
Folks, FOLKS- think this through....that tent eould not have withstood an avalanche not the skies which they supposedly used to help pitch the tent- 2 months later when they finally located them, any avalanche would have creamed that tent! I doubt it was even their tent st all but rather planted there!
Who cleared the scene with cartoon soviets firing machine guns? Y’all are better than this
The New theory is that they were killed in different location by accident. Then the tent and the bodies were staged.
Do Russian children tell ghost stories about this incident to each other?
30 days of night
👀👍
We are all one faulty bit of Russian kit away from all out nuclear war and the following nuclear winter.
I think it was a case of an avalanche or snow slide hitting the tent, causing them to panic and cut their way out of the tent.
Disoriented and scattered, they succumbed to the elements.
I mean clearly was the predator, you didn't think they just operate in jungles did you?
vaccines...
🙃
Avalanche!!!!
AND LETA NOT FORGET THE TONGUE WAS MISSING, EYEBALLS WERE MISSING, TGEIR SKIN WAS BRIGHT ORANGE- SNOW AVALANCHE MY BUTT!
I HAVE THE ANSWER TO THIS!!! There is root that grows in that area that russkies take. It's like "Bath Salts" and thusly the same behavior is displayed! A bag of the same "herb" was found on the hikers who died there in the 50's (?). Please SOMEONE research this "herb" and report back. Thanks
There is no mystery. Hikers messed up setting tent and got swept by an avalanche. There are plenty of examples where experienced hikers messed up from all over the world.
....so they all had burns? and the surrounding area as well? from an avalance. Okay...
@@bettycocker2226 half of the "findings" are dubious, as always, and yes, some get burns, but believe what you like.
Hypothermia!
Yeti
not really a cold war subject more of a crime mystery
How many totally ridiculous theories which do not explain so many facts..!
What does this have to do with the cold war? I feel like at this pace the channel will take 5 years to show what happened in Cold war in the 70s and the host will retire before they cover the 80s.
Don't be silly! Everyone knows Claymores don't work on Yetis.
Yeah, "If you believe in that sort of thing..." 😉🕵👹👽😈🌬🏔