Core i3 12100 vs Ryzen 5 3600 Gaming Benchmark with RTX 3090 | Test in 10 Games |

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 9 янв 2025

Комментарии • 141

  • @gametests
    @gametests  3 года назад +13

    System Specs :
    i3 12100 - amzn.to/3zzxlZ2
    R5 3600 - amzn.to/3n3YApJ
    ASUS TUF Gaming - amzn.to/3HzUfCq
    Rog Crosshair VIII Hero - amzn.to/33oYgLf
    | Bios 3801
    Nvidia Geforce RTX 3090 amzn.to/3o0fTYh
    Memory :
    2X16 GB 3600 mhz G Skill TridentZ Neo
    16-18-18-38 amzn.to/2YhYstm
    CPU Cooler
    Noctua NH-D15S amzn.to/3k4W9l6
    1 TB Corsair Force MP600 amzn.to/3o0gqtf
    Operating System:
    Windows 11 Pro
    Nvidia Driver version 497.29
    Timestamps :
    0:00 Battlefield 2042
    1:02 Forza Horizon 5
    2:04 Microsoft Flight Simulator
    2:46 CSGO
    3:48 Red Dead Redemption 2
    4:39 The Witcher 3
    5:40 The Shadow of The Tomb Raider
    6:23 Rainbow 6 Seige
    7:25 Cyberpunk 2077
    8:06 Metro Exodus
    i3 12100 is the new Budget King. Best value CPU for gaming in 2022.

    • @keonzin3148
      @keonzin3148 2 года назад

      what air cooler did you use to keep the i3 cool

    • @keonzin3148
      @keonzin3148 2 года назад

      oops can you test in dota 2?

    • @umarazmat
      @umarazmat 2 года назад

      can you do with a cheaper GPU 4GB card like and basic motherboard not high end?
      building a cheaper rig. while choosing one of this processor or i5-10th gen or even i7-4th or 6th gen.

  • @ilililliliili4589
    @ilililliliili4589 3 года назад +51

    Thanks a lot! I saw the bench of 12100 with 5600x. Even at the match, 12100 showed fps equivalent to 5600x. I think Intel made a huge budget killer

    • @goregejones7248
      @goregejones7248 3 года назад +5

      Yes but don't forget those benchmark were made in high end motherboard z690 , for budget motherboards such h610 , b660 you may get little less fps

    • @AbcdEf-lz6oe
      @AbcdEf-lz6oe 3 года назад +23

      @@goregejones7248 On a low end CPU with a maximum power draw of at most 65 Watts, unless the VRM is explosive or defective, any motherboard would give the same performance. With exception of the H610 in case you want to overclock memory.

    • @Andre-1331
      @Andre-1331 3 года назад +3

      It looks like we got reincarnation of Core 2 Duo.

    • @monke2361
      @monke2361 3 года назад +10

      @@goregejones7248 b660 and z690 are the same performance on the 12100, it makes no difference man

    • @mandogaming1683
      @mandogaming1683 3 года назад +1

      @@monke2361 bro what do you think if i pair i3 with 1650 gpu how much perfy or fps will i get as compared to this

  • @reeturaj2455
    @reeturaj2455 3 года назад +30

    12100 is a beast in gaming.

  • @Dexiefy
    @Dexiefy 3 года назад +42

    Gotta say, this is extremly impressive performance for a quad core that costs so little. However, its price/performance hinges highly on motherboard costs of b660 and intel likes to increase board prices every generation so that might be a deal killer. But at least this year shapes up to be very interesting in CPU department.

    • @furydua781
      @furydua781 3 года назад

      I mean, i was about to build a budget gaming rig soon, and was thinking b450/R3 2200G and then get an rx570 or better, then swap out the 2200g for a 5600 and eventually R9 + RTX3000 series. But looking at this, starting with 12100F and jump straight to RX560 or even RX550 with a Z690 to make 12900k relevant later is probably better, even tho its "only" capped at 12900k. But if AMDs AM5 can support multiple gen like AM4 did, i would need to reconsider my choice.

    • @Ang3lUki
      @Ang3lUki 3 года назад +2

      @@furydua781 12900K is already better than the 5950X and the 13900K is going to have twice the E cores and better single thread. This is going to be one insanely good platform.

    • @everope
      @everope 3 года назад

      @@furydua781 I get your reasoning and it's great you're considering future upgradeability, but this approach rarely pays off. You're probably considering the cheapest Z690 (Asrock) boards then right? Well they won't run your future 12900K at full potential anyways (see Hardware Unboxed). You'll need to upgrade your cooling, power supply... By the time you can afford a 12900K it won't be worth it. Would you for example buy a used 9900K today for $300 (that can pull 145 Watts if you still had a Z390 board, when the 12100F beats it?
      Are you going with a DDR5 board to be future proof? DDR5 is very expensive now...
      What's your budget and what do you want to play now?

    • @furydua781
      @furydua781 3 года назад

      @@Ang3lUki yeah, i was so happy when i learned AM4 upgradability, but i guess its old news now.

    • @furydua781
      @furydua781 3 года назад

      @@everope i mean where i live, most of the used PC parts can still sell for atleast 50% its new price, since theres such a big market for a cheap parts (mind you most of them still buys 7700k or even 6th gen for their budget build, idk if theyre dumb, or idiots). So for cooling, PSU, and CPU i can get rid of them and get some financial help from them and upgrade them.
      About budget, im not sure, its quite complicated and i dont think i can afford to churn out like $500 in a single month, thats why i was thinking about the first team red route. Since beggars can't be choosers, ill just play whatever my pc can handle. 2200g is surprisingly good tbh, and it is dirt cheap.
      Also regarding Z690, i dont really mind to run 12900k not with its full potential for some time, because im most likely gonna stick with 12600k for a long time, but that is a great info, thank you. Also no, if im gonna build in Q1 ill go with DDR4.
      I still think im gonna give red team a second chance, ill wait until Q2 and save my money. Because AMD still have my trust with supporting the lower end, budget friendly parts.

  • @СергейМенделеев-е1е
    @СергейМенделеев-е1е 3 года назад +6

    Hello, it would be interesting to see the tests in 4k of these processors with a 3090 video card

  • @fired777
    @fired777 3 года назад +17

    Intel is back BABY!

    • @chovekb
      @chovekb 3 года назад

      HAHAHA have some fun for just a few months boy!

    • @fired777
      @fired777 3 года назад +2

      @@chovekb OK and you AMD fan fanboys can have fun with zen4 for few months too lol

    • @chovekb
      @chovekb 3 года назад

      @@fired777 No, You!

    • @fired777
      @fired777 3 года назад

      You should lay off some of that copium bro

    • @chovekb
      @chovekb 3 года назад

      @@fired777 i5-12400 still sucking to 56000X and 12600K to 5800X LOOOL and Ryzen Zen3+ and Zen4 are coming in few months LOLOLOL OH MY BACK.

  • @Roger8338.
    @Roger8338. 3 года назад +7

    Can't wait to build pc with 12100

  • @topdecker1334
    @topdecker1334 3 года назад +3

    CS:GO: 400+ FPS
    This Video: 60...
    My brain: wtf, 400fps i can see all of it

  • @fabitosan
    @fabitosan 2 года назад +3

    Good video, could you do another video with 1440p and 4k, to make sure that 12100 is better value at those levels with high end GPUs?

  • @D-2-the-no
    @D-2-the-no 2 года назад

    Very good video. This is a prime example of what me and another guy were arguing with someone about on another videos comments. More cores does not trump architecture. Same goes for 12100f vs 10400f.

  • @yurge8922
    @yurge8922 2 года назад +6

    Аплодирую стоя, за тест бюджетника с Топом 3090!!! , Автору спасибище, т.к. видео Отвечает на Хреналион вопросов желающим собрать комп поиграть!!!)

    • @csamd9049
      @csamd9049 2 года назад +1

      пусть поставит разрешение повыше и не хватит этой видеокарты на обоих процессорах

  • @mandogaming1683
    @mandogaming1683 3 года назад +3

    bro what do you think if i pair i3 with 1650 gpu how much performance or fps will i get as compared to this

  • @kratos7399
    @kratos7399 3 года назад +10

    Now we need a b660 board for $100.

  • @DocWantoN
    @DocWantoN 2 года назад +3

    so basically 12100 = 10700 ?

  • @GamerVijayy
    @GamerVijayy 2 года назад +1

    I've just got my i3 12100 pc built😍

  • @Bafana777
    @Bafana777 Год назад

    Were you using a stock cooler for both cpu's?

  • @ravionfreefire7968
    @ravionfreefire7968 2 года назад +2

    can anyone tell me why he is using graphic card with these APUs?

  • @Dark88Dragon
    @Dark88Dragon 2 года назад +3

    More than 4C/8T and 12GB RAM are not really needed for Ultra Gaming (IPC), still the sweetspot today. If you wanna go for more futureproofness just crank up the settings a little, 6 Cores (IPC) and 16GB and you are more than good for the next years to come...in the end its all about your GPU

    • @GewelReal
      @GewelReal 2 года назад

      It's not all about GPU lol. Anything older than Ryzen/Coffee Lake already struggles heavily these days

  • @alex2valid.
    @alex2valid. 3 года назад +5

    Sorry AMD fans (like me),but intel is built different for this hard times

    • @ancientslav4863
      @ancientslav4863 3 года назад +1

      I got a Ryzen 5 1600 + RX570 4GB and they both served me well. I sold that PC and got a Ryzen 5 5600G with Vega 7 iGPU. Sure, the GPU doesn't suffice, but I'm planning on getting a second hand 1060 or 1660ti. Then I see this i3 for 120$ here. Damn, what value. I'm gonna get that one. Tho not many boards here, only 95$ and up for the ugliest boards looking like 40$. The socket is too new

  • @mdsaadrafe2796
    @mdsaadrafe2796 5 месяцев назад

    Now ryzen 5 3600 price has dropped so low and now you can go with it compared to i3 121000

    • @1_43
      @1_43 4 месяца назад

      3600 and 12100f is the same price in my country

  • @abbassonija4747
    @abbassonija4747 4 месяца назад

    is this core i3 running games on ddr4 or ddr5 rams?

  • @rjwaxi5415
    @rjwaxi5415 3 года назад +3

    And i thought 4 Cores time has come thank God i watch this video otherwise i was going to buy 11400 soon

    • @Angel7black
      @Angel7black 3 года назад +1

      Dont listen to Tech Deals or anybody who says 4 cores are dead, and 6 cores are stupid and you need 8 cores for the future. Its bullshit and all about IPC and cache. Very very very few games need more than 4c 8t to run smoothly. Just till now a lot of 4 core chips were kinda slow or only as fast as the 7700K

    • @Dark88Dragon
      @Dark88Dragon 2 года назад +1

      ​@@Angel7black Right, more than 4C/8T and 12GB RAM are not really needed for Ultra Gaming (IPC), still the sweetspot today. If you wanna go for more futureproofness just crank up the settings a little, 6 Cores (IPC) and 16GB and you are more than good for the next years to come...in the end its all about your GPU

  • @grasshopper1611
    @grasshopper1611 3 года назад +11

    Finally a budget CPU.

    • @nix123ism
      @nix123ism 3 года назад +5

      Yes, I had a i3 10105f and even that was pretty impressive for the cost , this new i3 looks even better and at the moment the only cheap ryzen cpu is the 5600g in my country and is more than double the price....

  • @a2zistoolong448
    @a2zistoolong448 2 года назад

    What? Is it not bottlenecking the GPU though? How is the CPU use only at 70-80%

  • @prabhakardhar1379
    @prabhakardhar1379 3 года назад +3

    i3 12100 is really impressive

  • @ldjkng6909
    @ldjkng6909 2 года назад +4

    Rtx 3050 and i3 12100 are best budget combo right now

  • @GXSergio
    @GXSergio 3 года назад +1

    Is this right? Comparing this test with the Intel Core i5 12600K vs i7 12700K vs i9 12900K review you made, this processor is getting higher avg fps in some games, I don't understand, please clarify.

    • @gametests
      @gametests  3 года назад +1

      Yes, In CSGO it's maybe due to MSAA option was enabled for that benchmark at 8x. that's why it's getting less fps.

    • @GXSergio
      @GXSergio 3 года назад

      @@gametests Not because CSGO but because I am seeing this results from your data:
      RDR2: i3 156 (avg fps) vs i5 151
      Shadow of TR: i3 169 vs i5 198
      Cyberpunk: i3 106 vs i5 137
      Is that with the same game settings? Is quite shocking if true

    • @gametests
      @gametests  3 года назад +1

      @@GXSergio that must be due to disimilar game settings which I don't remember for that video exactly. As it's not possible for i3 to be faster than i5.

  • @Jimster481
    @Jimster481 3 года назад

    So as of today this chip doesn't exist anywhere in the USA already...

  • @mandogaming1683
    @mandogaming1683 3 года назад +1

    What if we use 1650super with intel i3 12100 please i wants to know

    • @gametests
      @gametests  3 года назад

      You won't see any cpu bottleneck.

    • @mandogaming1683
      @mandogaming1683 3 года назад

      What is bottleneck bro

    • @monetarnie3841
      @monetarnie3841 2 года назад

      @@mandogaming1683 when cpu is super powerful and the gpu is weak or vice versa and they limit each other.

  • @ifrx
    @ifrx 3 года назад +3

    pls i5 10400 vs i3-12100F

    • @monke2361
      @monke2361 3 года назад +1

      12100 wins imo

  • @phamvuthanhtai1725
    @phamvuthanhtai1725 3 года назад +3

    Intel core i3 and i5 is the best for low budget gaming 1080p.

  • @ebis12.8
    @ebis12.8 3 года назад

    Any tips on how to install my 3600 on a Z590 / Z690? Curious how you managed to do that

    • @robertmendez7052
      @robertmendez7052 3 года назад +1

      what

    • @gametests
      @gametests  3 года назад +2

      It's X570, that was a typo, I have edited.

    • @eclipsegst9419
      @eclipsegst9419 3 года назад +2

      What you do is, break off all those extra bits of wire AMD leaves sticking out of the bottom of the CPU so that you have a nice flat mating surface. Then you just install your CPU like normal 🤣

  • @ameerr0812
    @ameerr0812 3 года назад +1

    good proc the problem is the board a bit expensive

    • @PandaManArchives
      @PandaManArchives 3 года назад +1

      It think it's worth saying up money for an extra week or two for it

    • @saricubra2867
      @saricubra2867 3 года назад +1

      The problem is the lack of e cores, intel could make this i3 a 8 core 12 thread CPU instead of a traditional quad core.

  • @shis10
    @shis10 3 года назад

    0:45 music name ?

    • @gametests
      @gametests  3 года назад +1

      ruclips.net/video/TrNDRrDXQdo/видео.html

    • @shis10
      @shis10 3 года назад

      @@gametests thanks

  • @micaellanoeric4122
    @micaellanoeric4122 2 года назад +1

    I don't get why both of them can't run at 100% usage constantly...

  • @arturochavez741
    @arturochavez741 3 года назад

    8:09 Music name?

  • @priteshdamor5534
    @priteshdamor5534 2 года назад +1

    Intel nailed it 😌

  • @Moinkhan-mg6sc
    @Moinkhan-mg6sc 3 года назад

    can you show us how good Core i3 12100 igpu?

    • @thenotsookayguy
      @thenotsookayguy 3 года назад +2

      Ehhh, just search for a UHD 730 benchmark, the thing should be on par with a GT 730/720

  • @gan_abt
    @gan_abt 3 года назад

    why r5 3600 usage is lower than i3?
    I think if both cpus usage were same,fps will be similar

    • @andrexskin
      @andrexskin 3 года назад +2

      The i3 has 4 cores 8 threads, while the ryzen 3600 has 6 cores and 12 threads, so for example if a game fully utilizes the i3, the 3600 would not be at 100%

    • @eclipsegst9419
      @eclipsegst9419 3 года назад +2

      Because the 3600 has more cores and most games don't fully utilize more than 4 cores.

  • @little__secret_9119
    @little__secret_9119 3 года назад

    4 cores vs 6 core still 4 cores wins WTF 💔

    • @eclipsegst9419
      @eclipsegst9419 3 года назад +5

      Intel wasn't lying when they said 4 cores is enough for gaming. It's just that the 7700K aged after 5 years. One big IPC jump though and 4c/8t is doing 144hz gaming again EZ.

    • @chovekb
      @chovekb 3 года назад +1

      Two years and generations difference, that.

  • @AriaLarrabee
    @AriaLarrabee 3 года назад

    i just couldnt believe that i3 beats i5 in gaming??? is this same game settings??

    • @gametests
      @gametests  3 года назад

      Definitely No

    • @thenotsookayguy
      @thenotsookayguy 3 года назад

      Wait till you see a i3 12100 vs an i7 930.

    • @chovekb
      @chovekb 3 года назад +1

      it's just 2 cores difference, but whole TWO YEARS+ difference as well, so nothing special.

    • @saricubra2867
      @saricubra2867 3 года назад

      @@chovekb It's special because it's over 40% in IPC increase for two years which is NOT common in the CPU market since many years or a very, very long time.

  • @FuXioN_7777
    @FuXioN_7777 2 года назад

    The i3 is jumping around 80% while r5 is around 60%

    • @Renekor
      @Renekor 2 года назад

      Fanboy detected

    • @FuXioN_7777
      @FuXioN_7777 2 года назад

      @@Renekor Lol I am not a fan boy I belive in competition so that we can get things cheap

  • @RyoushikiandRyoushi
    @RyoushikiandRyoushi 3 года назад +1

    intel comeback

  • @iorianam8070
    @iorianam8070 3 года назад +1

    Intel always more cooler and more power than Ryzen. I saw future for intel 😍😍😍😍

  • @prabhakardhar1379
    @prabhakardhar1379 3 года назад

    nice benchmark

  • @shis10
    @shis10 3 года назад +1

    Impressive

  • @Takonom
    @Takonom 2 года назад +1

    Intel is bs Amd is holding crown even if 3600 cost 500 it is better because I love Amd

    • @Renekor
      @Renekor 2 года назад

      Fanboy detected

  • @ahmadmalik5501
    @ahmadmalik5501 2 года назад

    all i can say "bootleneck"

    • @Renekor
      @Renekor 2 года назад

      Pero funciona muy bien..

  • @neeraj.chaudhary
    @neeraj.chaudhary 3 года назад

    👍👍🔥