Oh and your 1984 review really helped me for one of my final papers last semester for English because you provided some quotes I ended up using in my essay.
I love and watch both versions of Scarface together in one day when I get the chance. And yes, a lot of people don't realize or even believe that the Al Pacino version from 1983 is a remake either. One more fact about the Al Pacino version of Scarface that needs to be brought up is that it also has a counterpart movie 🎬. And that particular movie 🎬 is Carlito's Way which was released in 1993(ten years after Scarface). And that movie is the second collaboration between Al Pacino and Brian De Palma(director) and there also three "Easter Eggs" from Scarface that are in Carlito's Way as well.
Scarface (MCMXXXII) IS SUPERIOR to the very loose remake in many ways. I. the original does not have graphic violence and incessant profanity. II. The acting in the original is natural and not over-the-top, like Pacino decided to do. III. The original is much shorter and is in black-and-white. There are only two things I like about the remake. I. The music written by Giorgio Moroder. II. Tony deciding to not kill his target because the man's wife and children are with him.
The photography of the remake is top tier,that movie alongside Miami Vice made a style that many other pieces of art would adapt. Al Pacino did an amazing job as Montana, from the voice to the facial expressions,it's almost like if Al Pacino actually snorted coke. And the original was really graphic and controversial for its time.
I highly recommend "The Public Enemy" & "Angels with Dirty Faces" to anyone who liked the original.
Oh and your 1984 review really helped me for one of my final papers last semester for English because you provided some quotes I ended up using in my essay.
Awesome!
Paul muni vs Marlon Brando who is best body language actor
I maybe in the minority when I say, I did not like the 1983 Scarface. Maybe I was spoiled by more modern gangster films but I just didn’t dig it.
Omg no way another one of my recommendations, love your videos
I love and watch both versions of Scarface together in one day when I get the chance. And yes, a lot of people don't realize or even believe that the Al Pacino version from 1983 is a remake either. One more fact about the Al Pacino version of Scarface that needs to be brought up is that it also has a counterpart movie 🎬. And that particular movie 🎬 is Carlito's Way which was released in 1993(ten years after Scarface). And that movie is the second collaboration between Al Pacino and Brian De Palma(director) and there also three "Easter Eggs" from Scarface that are in Carlito's Way as well.
Both of these films are absolute classics ! I love the Al Pacino one more tho ! I can’t wait for a remake ! I think it would be dope
The word is spelled though.
What the hell does dope mean?
Can you do "The man eaters of Tsavo" and "The ghost and the darkness" sometime?
Adding it to the list!
I never knew scarface 1984 was a remake 😮 learn something new everyday 🤔
The original Scarface HAS NO PROFANITY.
Wait really?
Yes.
I heard the original had incestuous profanity
@@yes6137 you heard wrong.
The book Scarface really pushes the incest motive……… Tony can’t keep his eyes 👀 off his sister when she walks when she leaves
1932 !
Scarface (MCMXXXII) IS SUPERIOR to the very loose remake in many ways. I. the original does not have graphic violence and incessant profanity. II. The acting in the original is natural and not over-the-top, like Pacino decided to do. III. The original is much shorter and is in black-and-white.
There are only two things I like about the remake. I. The music written by Giorgio Moroder. II. Tony deciding to not kill his target because the man's wife and children are with him.
The photography of the remake is top tier,that movie alongside Miami Vice made a style that many other pieces of art would adapt.
Al Pacino did an amazing job as Montana, from the voice to the facial expressions,it's almost like if Al Pacino actually snorted coke.
And the original was really graphic and controversial for its time.
The MCMXXXII classic was in black-and-white, you dweeb, so how could it be graphic?
Hi, excellent content!! Do you have an email address for business inquiries? I couldn't find one on your page.
Thanks! adamwrightreviews@gmail.com