BATTLESHIP SIZE COMPARISON

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 8 сен 2024
  • In this RUclips video, we will be exploring the size comparison of various World War 2 battleships. From the colossal Japanese Yamato, known for its sheer size and power, to the sleek and agile American Iowa class battleships, we will compare the overall tonnage (measured in metric tons) of these historical vessels that played crucial roles in naval warfare during World War 2. Prepare to be amazed by the immense scale of these battleships and gain a greater understanding of the naval might that shaped the outcome of the war.
    #battleship #size #comparison

Комментарии • 377

  • @user-bm8pr3ws4w
    @user-bm8pr3ws4w 2 месяца назад +85

    長門と陸奥のデーターが新造初期のデータになっている為小さすぎる。扶桑型、伊勢型、金剛型は近代改装後のデータになっている。同じ近代改装後で表示するなら長門型は40000tクラスである。

  • @beatboxbuggi6884
    @beatboxbuggi6884 Месяц назад +49

    The French and Italians really had some underrated battleships

    • @InfoRanker
      @InfoRanker  Месяц назад

    • @Abbeville_Kid
      @Abbeville_Kid Месяц назад +7

      @@beatboxbuggi6884 underrated and underwater.

    • @fabriziopastorino3792
      @fabriziopastorino3792 Месяц назад +3

      @@Abbeville_Kid the end of arizona

    • @Abbeville_Kid
      @Abbeville_Kid Месяц назад +2

      @@fabriziopastorino3792 that was weak. Was that supposed to be an insult? Italy had like two survive the war. Congratulations, you had one more than the Japanese and two more than Germany.

    • @fabriziopastorino3792
      @fabriziopastorino3792 Месяц назад

      @@Abbeville_Kid I assume that his sources are Mickey Mouse magazine, since after the armistice we only lost the battleship Roma, for three years we prevented the English fleet from acting at its best by sinking HMS Queen Elizabeth and HMS Valiant HMS Jervis in Alexandria. In total at the end of the war we saved 105 ships, my dear stupid American

  • @ashfxxxnla
    @ashfxxxnla Месяц назад +31

    YAMATO is so beautiful

  • @ralfhtg1056
    @ralfhtg1056 2 месяца назад +39

    For Musashi you give the standard displacement. For Yamato you give the maximum load out. Doesn't make sense. Bismarck's maximum displacement was not 50300 tons, but 50950 tons. And does the Gneisenau really have 38 cm twin turrets installed, despite this never came to be?

    • @hanjizoe2648
      @hanjizoe2648 2 месяца назад +4

      The Gneisenau one is accurate though, she did have 15 Inch guns installed. BUT, they never saw action because Gneisenau would end up getting right after the upgrades.

    • @TheKentucky777
      @TheKentucky777 2 месяца назад +9

      @@hanjizoe2648 Gneisenau never received the 15" guns--she was hit multiple times while in dry dock and the repair work for that pushed her out of the possibility of getting the new guns with the advance of the Red Army.

    • @GaryJones69420
      @GaryJones69420 2 месяца назад

      They used wows and warthunder models. For example Utah is a clone of Vermont on wows.

    • @Abbeville_Kid
      @Abbeville_Kid Месяц назад

      @@GaryJones69420 well if Gaijin says it was true, it’s gotta be true right? 😆

    • @user-ns8ux3ez2e
      @user-ns8ux3ez2e 29 дней назад

      Gneisenau have 28cm gun like the graf spee

  • @zombieperk4807
    @zombieperk4807 Месяц назад +6

    When the USS Wisconsin collided with the USS Eaton, there was a chunk missing from her bow so what they did is they took the bow from the unfinished Kentucky and put it on the USS Wisconsin. Hence making the USS Wisconsin 11 in longer than her sisters and making her the longest battleship in history

    • @InfoRanker
      @InfoRanker  Месяц назад

    • @AI-cp1jg
      @AI-cp1jg 7 дней назад

      Do officers get reprimanded when there are collisions?

  • @armed_american
    @armed_american Месяц назад +9

    Glad to see the Wyomings weren't left out.
    Those old girls need more attention.

  • @martinschnelle3077
    @martinschnelle3077 3 месяца назад +15

    Gneisenau had the same armament like Scharnhorst, two triple-turrets at the front. The video also seems to depict that Scharnhorst was taller. But both were sister ships.
    Musashi and Yamato were also sister ships with about the same tonnage, other than depicted here.

    • @CRAIGKMSBISMARCKTIRPITZ533
      @CRAIGKMSBISMARCKTIRPITZ533 2 месяца назад +1

      Hitler's Ship's Were & Are Male's Not Females. GNEISENAU Had A ReFit While His Older Brother Was Spose To. But The British Kept On Bombing Them. They Tried To End SCHARNHORST Life

    • @balli7836
      @balli7836 2 месяца назад +2

      Since the displacement of ships varied throughout the war, due to modernisations of the initial designs, i think he used the displacement for Musashi from 1942, after its commissioning, while the displacement for Yamato is the 1945 displacement shortly before it was sunk.
      Bismarck and Tirpitz for example are also sister ships, but Tirpitz was heavier due to the fact, that it was commissioned a while later, after Bismarck was already sunk in its first mission. Because of that, Tirpitz was already build with enhanced features, like torpedo tubes on both sides and stronger AA-armament. If Bismarck would have survived, it would have been upgraded to the same specifications.

    • @martinschnelle3077
      @martinschnelle3077 2 месяца назад +3

      @@balli7836 But we're talking about much bigger differences here, nearly 9,000 tons between Yamato and Musashi - that was never the case.
      Comparison Bismarck - Tirpitz: Tirpitz was heavier, anyway than Bismarck, because it had more draft already in design and construction, because it had a bigger range. When Bismarck was sunk, Tirpitz was already commissioned and in training. Her captain insisted the ship was combat-ready (which would have made a big difference, if it had also been part of Operation Rheinübung), but was overruled, because the crew just had four months of training compared to six month on Bismarck.
      And no, Bismarck would have got no Torpedo launchers (Tirpitz had torpedo launchers, not tubes) because at that time they already saw how useless they were.

    • @balli7836
      @balli7836 2 месяца назад +1

      @@martinschnelle3077 It is of course also possible, that he simply messed up standard and full load displacement with Musashi and Yamato.

    • @deathsnake6956
      @deathsnake6956 2 месяца назад +2

      The Gneisenau was in shipyard to get the new 15" 38cm guns like the Tirpitz, Bismarck had. After a Bombing run it was terrible damaged and work stopped.

  • @vincentnigoza101
    @vincentnigoza101 7 месяцев назад +16

    Nagato and Mutsu is 46,690 Tons Fully Loaded...

  • @Teodot
    @Teodot Месяц назад +4

    3:22 Seems like Littorio and Roma cook pizza on their turrets.

  • @padantyarasendriasuseno7898
    @padantyarasendriasuseno7898 2 месяца назад +70

    My favorite battleship IJN YAMATO

    • @InfoRanker
      @InfoRanker  2 месяца назад +2

    • @Legend.45.098
      @Legend.45.098 2 месяца назад +10

      Me too my favourite battleship yamato

    • @Ryuu1010YT
      @Ryuu1010YT 2 месяца назад +4

      oh that worlds largest coral reef that ship was too useless

    • @olokolok1233
      @olokolok1233 2 месяца назад +6

      ​@@Ryuu1010YTI mean if the battleship had not sunken it would be used in scrapyard yk ?

    • @Ryuu1010YT
      @Ryuu1010YT 2 месяца назад +2

      @@olokolok1233 either yamato would be being nuclear test or be Scrapped and no way usa is not letting japan keep their own ships especially being museum

  • @d.bdisaster6615
    @d.bdisaster6615 10 дней назад +2

    Man the background sound!!😮

  • @theminingassassin16
    @theminingassassin16 27 дней назад +2

    The interesting thing about WW2-era German battleships is that they weren't actually meant for naval combat. Because Hitler knew his navy wouldn't be able to contend with the British Royal Navy, he decided to have them repurposed for hunting down and destroying Allied merchant shipping. By doing this, Hitler hoped to cripple Great Britain by cutting off supplies and resources the nation needed to survive. While ships like Bismarck and Gneisenau could fight against enemy warships in a pinch, their lighter caliber guns weren't that effective for taking out enemy battleships. Therefore, the ships relied on their greater speed to escape from superior enemy forces.

  • @Hogwash13
    @Hogwash13 2 месяца назад +8

    Great video

  • @user-ph8hl7rb8n
    @user-ph8hl7rb8n Месяц назад +4

    Very cool video! Keep up the good work 👌

  • @battlecraze
    @battlecraze 7 месяцев назад +17

    Very detailed ships, loved it

  • @JimIAmDaniels
    @JimIAmDaniels 2 месяца назад +9

    Pound for Pound HMS Warspite see more action than any other battle ship.

    • @InfoRanker
      @InfoRanker  2 месяца назад

    • @rusmorpeh3314
      @rusmorpeh3314 Месяц назад

      How so? 😄

    • @adubs3080
      @adubs3080 8 дней назад

      @@rusmorpeh3314she fought in through heavy action during 2 world wars. She fought in battles from the North Atlantic to the pacific

  • @user-ll9nk7ex7i
    @user-ll9nk7ex7i 2 месяца назад +5

    画面端に映った瞬間わかる扶桑の奇抜さよ

  • @alessandroloverde9813
    @alessandroloverde9813 20 дней назад +1

    They've put the Conte di Cavour after her second modernization that was never completed. I'm impressed; I've never seen a model, only a drawing of the 70's and a couple of photos of the modernization underway.

  • @swaminathanthegreatest2407
    @swaminathanthegreatest2407 7 месяцев назад +25

    Amazing video as always InfoRanker. Keep it up legend

    • @InfoRanker
      @InfoRanker  7 месяцев назад

      Thanks a ton! ❤😀👍

  • @highlanderknight
    @highlanderknight 7 месяцев назад +11

    Interesting video, but there are some mixed up numbers there. Some ships are listed with standard displacement and others with full load displacement. Easily noticeable with the two Japanese super battleships.

    • @InfoRanker
      @InfoRanker  7 месяцев назад +3

      Thanks for the info!

  • @BassRocket
    @BassRocket 3 дня назад +1

    I’ve toured the USS North Carolina in Wilmington NC

  • @tkyap2524
    @tkyap2524 7 месяцев назад +4

    Big doesn't mean great. It will mean a prized target requiring more support protection, especially air cover.

    • @InfoRanker
      @InfoRanker  7 месяцев назад +3

      They definitely don't build them like they used to. 😀

    • @TheTrytix
      @TheTrytix 3 месяца назад +2

      Obviously there was a reason why the Battleship became obsolete during WW2.
      You mentioned air cover, and yes that is true, that is required, often by adding multiple ships in the same fleet. However USA proved that with enough planes, it doesn't really matter.
      On Yamato's last voyage, she was accompanied by 8 Destroyers and a light cruiser. 10 ships in total, one of which was blistering with AA-guns. However, USA sent almost 400 fighters and bombers. And after 2 hours of fighting, 10-13 american planes had been shot down with another 52 damaged. Meanwhile, the Japanese fleet lost 4 of their destroyers and the light cruiser, and Yamato were sunk after being hit by 12 bombs and 7 torpedoes. So air power really showcased their dominance even in the naval theater of war.

  • @JUN-sr2hq
    @JUN-sr2hq 10 дней назад

    Look at the battleship Ise from the 2:17 position. we can see a lot of aircraft. Yes, this ship is the aviation battleship. It's my favorite battleship!!

  • @andrewkinsey8754
    @andrewkinsey8754 7 месяцев назад +4

    InfoRanker, where did you get the models for all these ships? Nice vid

    • @TheTrytix
      @TheTrytix 3 месяца назад +3

      I am assuming World of Warships. Considering they are only including ships that exist in that game. Hence why ships like Prince of Wales, Howe, Anson, Wisconsin, New Jersey and Yamashiro are not even included. And also why ships like Gneisenau has the upgraded 3 dual 380 mm. guns she was going to receive during the war but never did, the ship has them in World of Warships as to provide a slightly different play style to that of her sister ship Scharnhorst, which has the normal 3 triple 280 mm. main battery guns.

  • @amptechron
    @amptechron 7 месяцев назад +10

    Excellent!

  • @eod6348
    @eod6348 День назад +1

    Very beautiful ships shame most were scrapped or sank

  • @user-vf3oy9wm5t
    @user-vf3oy9wm5t Месяц назад +6

    My favourite battleship is roma

  • @WARSHIP8
    @WARSHIP8 2 месяца назад +8

    The Yamato was the most feared ship to USA

    • @InfoRanker
      @InfoRanker  2 месяца назад +1

    • @Ryuu1010YT
      @Ryuu1010YT 2 месяца назад +2

      and she had terrible Anti-Aircraft Guns and less action

    • @yocp23
      @yocp23 Месяц назад +1

      Well she was not designed to eat that many bombs

    • @yocp23
      @yocp23 Месяц назад

      @@Ryuu1010YTstop spamming that Yamato is useless NO ONE CARES just let them like what they like

    • @Ryuu1010YT
      @Ryuu1010YT Месяц назад

      @@yocp23 battleships were quite useless against aircrafts

  • @Bismarck1941-s7d
    @Bismarck1941-s7d Месяц назад +1

    2:42 Yo My 2 Fav Battleships

  • @wqmpw982
    @wqmpw982 29 дней назад +2

    性能とかどうでも良いけど、見た目だけなら大和のシルエットが一番美しい、呉市にある大和ミュージアムに実際に行ったけど、帝国海軍は本当に保有していたのかと思ってしまう。

  • @kristelvidhi5038
    @kristelvidhi5038 7 месяцев назад +3

    Can't wait for the new American battleships to come out, like the Infographic Show said there would be.

    • @InfoRanker
      @InfoRanker  7 месяцев назад +1

    • @kristelvidhi5038
      @kristelvidhi5038 7 месяцев назад +2

      @@InfoRanker the Iowas going in action is gonna epic.

    • @tankythemagnorite9855
      @tankythemagnorite9855 2 месяца назад

      ​@@kristelvidhi5038it would be cheaper to build new ones.

  • @willpat3040
    @willpat3040 3 месяца назад +4

    Thanks for making this but YFI, the 1st ship shown, USS UTAH should have had twin turrets (two guns per turret), not triples. What ship did you show there with triple turrets? Looks like a North Carolina class to me....
    Also it Gneisenau has triple turrets not twins. Should look just like the Scharnhorst you had right before. They were sister ship both with 3 guns per turret. I think you may have used a Bismarck class model by mistake for Gneisenau.
    Again thanks for making this but as others have pointed out since you used Standard displacement for some ship, Full Loads for others, and sometimes just completely wrong displacements for other ships, many of these ships are in the wrong order.

    • @balli7836
      @balli7836 2 месяца назад +1

      It seems that he used ship models from the game World of Warships and because there is no USS Utah in that game, he used the model of USS Vermont, which is a fictional "What if" ship in the game based on some of the Tillman battleship designs. Obviously, Vermont would be much larger and even rival, if not surpass, the Yamato-class battleships.

    • @battlerifleproductions7840
      @battlerifleproductions7840 2 месяца назад +1

      ​@@balli7836 It's not just world of warships but also War Thunder. If you look at the model for Arkansas, the model he uses is from war thunder as the model has 20mm Orlekin mounts which war Thunder's Arkansas has but not World of Warships Arkansas

    • @Bestplayer-mx6yb
      @Bestplayer-mx6yb 2 месяца назад +1

      No that’s from world of warships. Those turrets are different from any American ships that were actually built: it’s a mix of the Colorado’s 16in and the fast battleship 16in. The bow shape is also different and the side of it is different too. Pretty sure that’s World of Warships idea of an American battleship that wasn’t built within the Washington naval treaty but they took that initial design and gave it a refit similar to the Tennessees or West Virginia.

    • @balli7836
      @balli7836 2 месяца назад +1

      @@battlerifleproductions7840 Yeah, that's possible. I don't know that much about Warthunder and its ship models, but it's plausible. Arkansas was still in service as a battleship during WW2, while its sister ship Wyoming was transformed into a gunnery training ship before the war. So i guess that the model for Arkansas in Warthunder is the early or even late WW2 version?! In World of Warships they use the version of Arkansas as it was build, with no AA at all and the two cage masts.

  • @grrrlbreaker
    @grrrlbreaker 7 месяцев назад +5

    Really excellent representation!

    • @InfoRanker
      @InfoRanker  7 месяцев назад

      Thanks, glad you enjoyed! 😋

  • @AFYAMATO
    @AFYAMATO Месяц назад

    The shape of the bridge of the Hiei is completely different from that of its sister ships. The only one with a tower-shaped bridge is the Hiei.

  • @Abbeville_Kid
    @Abbeville_Kid Месяц назад +1

    They were all beautiful but size means nothing in the age of Carrier Warefare.

  • @rotton-c8o
    @rotton-c8o 2 месяца назад +1

    The ship being next to Fuso is looked like Yamashiro. Some their name are missing.

  • @Sauboy24
    @Sauboy24 7 дней назад +1

    My favorite battleships are all the American battleships

  • @Caroline_Grace-Gaspar.
    @Caroline_Grace-Gaspar. 2 месяца назад +3

    Yamato is the most legendary battleship and its almost at the same size as the USS Gerald R. Ford

    • @InfoRanker
      @InfoRanker  2 месяца назад

    • @Ryuu1010YT
      @Ryuu1010YT 2 месяца назад +3

      do even your research before commenting? Largest coral reef is not nowhere big as gerald r ford

  • @Hichatsu
    @Hichatsu 29 дней назад +7

    Musashi had exactly the same armaments as Yamato, and the same tonnage, you people need to get things correct.

    • @liamc9998
      @liamc9998 22 дня назад +2

      As far as their main armament goes, then yes. Though if we’re getting into secondary / AA armament then things ain’t so cut and dry. By the end of each of their service careers for example (ie. them sinking) Yamato had a far more extensive AA setup than Musashi did. Also - and I’m not 100% sure about this - I’m not completely sure Musashi was ever equipped with her wing mounted, triple 6” guns like Yamato was before they were fully removed to make way for her improved AA battery.

    • @Red_Diacez
      @Red_Diacez 18 дней назад

      Yamato had improvements later on...

  • @user-ti3fe6gg4s
    @user-ti3fe6gg4s 2 месяца назад +5

    LOVE THE IOWA CLASS

  • @Starguard631
    @Starguard631 7 месяцев назад +1

    i love how all the non us ships are very modest on secondaries or have them on the hull. and then the US ones are just like strap 1 million batteries to the side.

  • @Arrison-cm5is
    @Arrison-cm5is 4 месяца назад +2

    I like the video but I’m gonna die listing down the ships that sank and how they sank

  • @MattkelvinEsguerra-lf4mu
    @MattkelvinEsguerra-lf4mu 2 месяца назад +3

    Did you add mushashi

    • @InfoRanker
      @InfoRanker  2 месяца назад

      It's near the end of the video

  • @williamstone4334
    @williamstone4334 6 месяцев назад +2

    Be nice if year laid down were included.

  • @archmagosdominusbelisarius8836
    @archmagosdominusbelisarius8836 2 месяца назад +4

    To the people saying warship size doesnt matter. It absolutely does. The Bismarck didnt sink because it was large. It didnt have a fleet around it. The Prinz Eugen departed and it was alone completely

    • @ddoubleg
      @ddoubleg 18 дней назад

      Still size doesn’t matter….. HMS KGV was smaller than most ships but could easily beat any. The only ship it would struggle against is Yamato since it’s the only ship to have thicker armour than itself. But it could just wipe out the deck.

  • @geoffburrill9850
    @geoffburrill9850 2 месяца назад +3

    What crap, you wouldn't have known that the R.N. was the largest navy in the world at the start of W.W. 2. Where is HMS Hood the largest warship in the world for 20 years?

    • @quadfecta5259
      @quadfecta5259 2 месяца назад +6

      Hood was a battlecruiser

    • @Bestplayer-mx6yb
      @Bestplayer-mx6yb 2 месяца назад +1

      This is counting the largest ships of the war. Not until like 1940 or whatever. Yamato is heavier than Hood and overall larger. Same with Iowa.

    • @geoffburrill9850
      @geoffburrill9850 2 месяца назад

      @@quadfecta5259 Designed as a b.c. but evolved on the stocks to a fast battleship.

    • @tankythemagnorite9855
      @tankythemagnorite9855 2 месяца назад

      And where is HMS Rodney, sister to Nelson?

    • @tankythemagnorite9855
      @tankythemagnorite9855 2 месяца назад

      ​@@quadfecta5259as were the Scharnhorst class.

  • @johnbarrett9673
    @johnbarrett9673 9 дней назад +2

    Warspite.....👊👊👊🇬🇧

  • @user-nd4xh6yq1t
    @user-nd4xh6yq1t Месяц назад +2

    武蔵は大和よりも沢山の魚雷、爆撃を受けてなお長い時間沈みませんでした。

  • @タフィ3
    @タフィ3 21 день назад +1

    この動画でフランスの戦艦が好きになりました。

  • @alainduquenois3812
    @alainduquenois3812 24 дня назад +1

    Mon cuirassé coup de ❤ Yamato

  • @dryalga4000
    @dryalga4000 Месяц назад

    Never knew that the Kongou and Fusou classes had bigger displacements then the Nagato class

  • @MattkelvinEsguerra-lf4mu
    @MattkelvinEsguerra-lf4mu 2 месяца назад +2

    You should add South dakota it's American battle ship 🚢 just searc it in google how it looks like and add hms Rooney and hms majestic and hms Royal sorvegein 😊

  • @999lyrics4you
    @999lyrics4you 2 месяца назад +2

    Bro where's FS SUPER-ALSACE??

  • @mospeada1152
    @mospeada1152 21 день назад

    Why does the Scharnhorst and Gneisenau have different guns when they were sister ships?

    • @alessandroloverde9813
      @alessandroloverde9813 20 дней назад

      The model of the Gneisenau they've used here refers to a modernization of the ship with 6 380mm Bismarck's guns. The works began but they were never completed.

    • @mospeada1152
      @mospeada1152 20 дней назад

      @@alessandroloverde9813 11" to 15". Interesting.

  • @johnwheet7037
    @johnwheet7037 Месяц назад

    need to put the first one at the end again...

  • @InfoRanker
    @InfoRanker  7 месяцев назад +14

    Thanks for watching! 😀

  • @liamc9998
    @liamc9998 22 дня назад

    How does Dunkerque have the same tonnage as Strasbourg? Considering Strasbourg was given thicker armour, surely she should be heavier than her sister?

    • @Waldherz
      @Waldherz 18 дней назад +1

      Just a theory on my end: Maybe slightly more modern and lighter machinery, which could offset some of the extra weight.

    • @liamc9998
      @liamc9998 18 дней назад

      @@Waldherz, it’s a possibility. I would have to look into it a bit further though.

  • @davidhall6950
    @davidhall6950 Месяц назад +2

    Id take the Mighty Mo any fight any day.

    • @InfoRanker
      @InfoRanker  Месяц назад

      😀

    • @ddoubleg
      @ddoubleg 18 дней назад

      KGV would be the best choice. 100% the best designed ship of the war. Until vanguard

    • @davidhall6950
      @davidhall6950 18 дней назад

      @@ddoubleg I'll take the 51 years of service vs the 18. Don't get me wrong, both are absolute beasts of war, but longevity tips it for me.

  • @trumpwonandyouknowit
    @trumpwonandyouknowit 7 месяцев назад +1

    Hi. This video is great for #WorldOfWarshipsLegends

  • @gavinprime8154
    @gavinprime8154 2 месяца назад +2

    Why in the world is there a USS Vermont design as the first ship? Thats a fictional design that's supposed to be bigger than the USS Montana design. Get it right next time!

  • @Amiral_Zéro
    @Amiral_Zéro Месяц назад +2

    Cruiser Richelieu 🇫🇷🇫🇷🇫🇷❤️

  • @Slideblock
    @Slideblock 8 дней назад +1

    USS MISSOURI VS YAMATO?

  • @user-sf2kw9qp9q
    @user-sf2kw9qp9q Месяц назад

    Did I in this, really good video by the way miss HMS HOOD or was she just not so big.

    • @FitClipper
      @FitClipper Месяц назад +2

      Hood was a battlecruiser

    • @Jerry-zz2eu
      @Jerry-zz2eu Месяц назад +1

      @@FitClipper Wasn't She 57k tons?

    • @liamc9998
      @liamc9998 22 дня назад

      @@FitClipper, the only reason she was designated a battlecruiser was because of her speed. She basically has the same armour and armament as the Queen Elizabeth-Class.

    • @Waldherz
      @Waldherz 18 дней назад

      @@FitClipper So were the Scharnhorsts and you could also make an argument that both Dunkys were more battlecruiser than battleship.

  • @Rito-kun201
    @Rito-kun201 Месяц назад +1

    Wait, shouldn't Scharnhorst and Gneisenau have the same number of cannon barrels, why does Gneisenau only have two while Scharnhorst has three cannon barrels...???

    • @liamc9998
      @liamc9998 22 дня назад

      Because they’re taking into account the planned retrofit Gneisenau was supposed to undergo after her bow was blown off whilst she was in dry-dock falling Operation Cerberus.
      The guns were made and ready to install, but this was all taking place around the same time of the Battle of the Barents Sea was taking place, and after the less than stellar result of that surface engagement - which caused another German destroyer to be sunk and the Admiral Hipper damaged - Hitler ordered all of Germany’s surface warships to be scrapped with resources to be instead invested fully into U-boat production.
      In the end however Hitler was talked down scraping the entire surface fleet. Still, some sacrifices had to be made to do this however. Ships such as Hipper and Gneisenau being the most notable cases given their damage states.

    • @TineFangaming
      @TineFangaming 13 дней назад +2

      Retrofit from 12inch triple guns become 15inch twin guns which actually used on Bismarck

    • @liamc9998
      @liamc9998 13 дней назад +1

      @@TineFangaming, 11”, not 12”. Just a minor correction.

    • @Rito-kun201
      @Rito-kun201 13 дней назад +1

      Ok thank you guys~

  • @RuanzinGabriel
    @RuanzinGabriel 15 дней назад +1

    Japão tinha a marinha com o maior poder de fogo ate maior que o próprio reino Unido talvez 🤔🇬🇧?🇯🇵

  • @fabioalberti2120
    @fabioalberti2120 Месяц назад

    Bello avrei inserito anche Hood e Repulse 🇬🇧

  • @jonnyboi841
    @jonnyboi841 10 дней назад

    Why does Utah have triple turrets?

  • @Kaptancan.SeaKing
    @Kaptancan.SeaKing Месяц назад +2

    MİSSOURİ SEA OF KİNG⚓⚓⚓💙💙

  • @user-pj7tl7ko1w
    @user-pj7tl7ko1w 2 месяца назад +1

    何故サウスダコタ級はマサチューセッツとアラバマなんだろうか・・・?

    • @user-tc5ob7or2t
      @user-tc5ob7or2t 2 месяца назад

      Потому что они её систершипы.

  • @Rockhopper1163
    @Rockhopper1163 3 месяца назад +3

    Battleships became obsolete when aircraft carriers took to the water and it probably cost the Japanese the war. 🤔🤨

    • @InfoRanker
      @InfoRanker  3 месяца назад

    • @tomjerry4240
      @tomjerry4240 2 месяца назад +1

      Ño, they were like sitting ducks, German u boats had a field day sinking them...

    • @Rockhopper1163
      @Rockhopper1163 2 месяца назад +2

      @@tomjerry4240 What, ya think battleships sailed solo?? Much like todays aircraft carriers, battleships were escorts by a FLEET....BTW total number of battleships sunk by submarines is TWO, more aircraft carriers were sunk by subs....L2read!

    • @liamc9998
      @liamc9998 22 дня назад

      @@Rockhopper1163, honestly, battleships technically never totally become obsolete in the first place, it’s just that their downsides were pushed so far to the forefront after the events of WWII that all the benefit of keeping them were ignored.
      To this day nothing can clear a shoreline or bring the level of artillery support as a battleship can. Compared to the missiles of today, the artillery of a battleship - though not as far reaching (depending on the gun) - are significantly cheaper and can cause far more damage.

    • @ddoubleg
      @ddoubleg 18 дней назад +1

      No

  • @rubenpascual1142
    @rubenpascual1142 Месяц назад

    Wheres New Jersey and Wisconsin?

  • @Shen-gs1mb
    @Shen-gs1mb 11 дней назад

    USS Wisconsin left the chat

  • @user-xp6hb2xs3l
    @user-xp6hb2xs3l 21 день назад

    Hay un error,Iowa mide 270 metros de largo mientras que Yamato mide 263 metros de largo😐

  • @user-kg1sw8np3s
    @user-kg1sw8np3s Месяц назад

    プラモでも作って並べたら壮観だわな~

  • @EllenPhillips-iw6fg
    @EllenPhillips-iw6fg Месяц назад

    There wasn’t the Wisconsin:(

  • @cARl_loves_guns
    @cARl_loves_guns 4 месяца назад

    Marat and gangut is a heavy cruise

  • @rjcote2278
    @rjcote2278 2 месяца назад +1

    New Jersey snubbed🙄

  • @joeatwood1346
    @joeatwood1346 Месяц назад

    Utah? What the bloody hell; that wasn’t the Utah.

  • @riben_agong
    @riben_agong 27 дней назад

    GNEISENAUは三連砲塔では?
    YamatoとMusashiは同型艦だよ?基準排水量と満載排水量がゴッチャになってない?

  • @C_A65
    @C_A65 2 месяца назад +3

    You forgot the Wisconsin.

  • @Kiryuu27
    @Kiryuu27 7 месяцев назад +2

    Where Friedrich der Grosse & Grosser Kurfurst?

    • @Hogwash13
      @Hogwash13 7 месяцев назад +2

      Those are WWI ships. Video is WWII ships.

    • @Kiryuu27
      @Kiryuu27 7 месяцев назад +1

      Gneisenau 380mm main gun in WWII???@@Hogwash13

    • @JansenX12
      @JansenX12 7 месяцев назад +1

      ​@@Kiryuu27 280mm* the 380 are on the Bismarck

    • @marekzubrik647
      @marekzubrik647 6 месяцев назад

      ​@@JansenX12No Gneisenau was 380mm battleship

    • @marekzubrik647
      @marekzubrik647 6 месяцев назад

      Gneisenau is ww2 battleship

  • @lothanimperialeagle9278
    @lothanimperialeagle9278 Месяц назад

    where is Montana BB 67 ?

  • @user-tc5ob7or2t
    @user-tc5ob7or2t 2 месяца назад

    На Гнейзенау стояли трёх орудийные башни.

  • @F-Man
    @F-Man 7 месяцев назад +2

    Very many bigges schippes.

  • @ArnoldCastro-fw3ex
    @ArnoldCastro-fw3ex Месяц назад

    Pbbm I m very proud God bless pbbm sucsesful very very good

  • @The_Blue_titan28370
    @The_Blue_titan28370 5 месяцев назад +7

    Japanese empire Battleship is o.p💀💀💀💀

    • @InfoRanker
      @InfoRanker  5 месяцев назад

    • @Aditya_arts2008
      @Aditya_arts2008 4 месяца назад +1

      Yes like yamato💀

    • @annade-xw8yp
      @annade-xw8yp 2 месяца назад

      Yes like musashi💀

    • @Ryuu1010YT
      @Ryuu1010YT 2 месяца назад +1

      they had terrible aa guns and less actions than aircraft carriers

  • @andrewcharlessison3350
    @andrewcharlessison3350 5 часов назад

    German Battleship Mecklenburg

  • @WhoeverPingMeIsGay
    @WhoeverPingMeIsGay 4 месяца назад

    Utah u are using in video is Vermont class from WorldOfWarships...never exist and 70 000 tons

  • @duel223
    @duel223 2 месяца назад

    どこの国もバカみたいに大きい船を何隻も作って何隻も海の底に沈んだあの時代は凄い
    あの戦争が起こらず各国の筆頭戦艦が平和の証として観艦式がされればどれだけよかっただろうか

    • @user-bu2qh1ms2n
      @user-bu2qh1ms2n Месяц назад

      確実に開戦まったなしで作ってんのに平和のために観艦式は草
      ヒトラーが平和演説する並にユートピアな世界ですね。

    • @jaga_code007
      @jaga_code007 Месяц назад

      ⁠@@user-bu2qh1ms2nそうなれば良かったのにって言ってるだけじゃないか

  • @aalll_
    @aalll_ 2 месяца назад +2

    ijn zipang >>> all battleship

  • @BattleshipOrion
    @BattleshipOrion 2 месяца назад +1

    So...why did you list both sisters of the New York, Nagato, Ise, Scharnhorst, South Dakota, Bismarck, Iowa, and Yamato classes? Did you NOT actually do proper research? Ise & Hyuga are the SAME, the Scharnhorst & Bismarck's maybe get a chance, but the ONLY way you'd get away with the rest is if you showed different variants, for example, even knows the Ise's from their aviation battleship days, but not from their inter-war era configuration (they had twin funnels), The iowa's LESS SO! I didn't see that fore-mast on either Missouri or Iowa, nor the other changes.

    • @Ryuu1010YT
      @Ryuu1010YT 2 месяца назад

      this channel only using warships from a game

    • @liamc9998
      @liamc9998 22 дня назад +1

      Don’t forget about Dunkerque and Strasbourg, though realistically the only difference between them is their armour with Strasbourg having substantially more than Dunkerque to the point the latter could reasonably be counted as a battlecruiser.

    • @Waldherz
      @Waldherz 18 дней назад +2

      Ise and Hyuga can be used to represent the last two stages of those ships.
      They were regular battleships before the japanese navy decided to waste ressources on a concept that was never used.

  • @OyoguNoumiso
    @OyoguNoumiso Месяц назад

    しかし、ペリーの黒船にビビっていた
    時代から、よく、たった80年で
    世界最大級の戦艦を作ったな。

  • @shanemcpherson1015
    @shanemcpherson1015 2 месяца назад +7

    Iowa class by far the best.

    • @InfoRanker
      @InfoRanker  2 месяца назад +4

    • @Bestplayer-mx6yb
      @Bestplayer-mx6yb 2 месяца назад +1

      Agreed

    • @liamc9998
      @liamc9998 22 дня назад

      They’re objectively the best blend of firepower, speed and armour.

    • @ddoubleg
      @ddoubleg 18 дней назад

      No it’s not. It only has the best speed. Vanguard was the best designed battleship of all time. Also iowas armour sucked so HMS KGV, Bismarck Yamato etc could all beat it.
      Best ship of WW2 HMS KGV it had the best armour and newest guns.

    • @ddoubleg
      @ddoubleg 18 дней назад +1

      @@liamc9998terrible armour and its speed was bad in the Atlantic. If you put the Iowa in the North Sea against any newer European battleship it would sink in minutes.

  • @ronchabale
    @ronchabale Месяц назад

    Musashi was actually heavier than Yamato

  • @iamgaijin88
    @iamgaijin88 2 месяца назад +2

    the bigger they are, the harder they survive.
    - aircraft carrier

    • @InfoRanker
      @InfoRanker  2 месяца назад

    • @Ryuu1010YT
      @Ryuu1010YT 2 месяца назад

      they less actions than aircraft carriers.

  • @TheCushiman
    @TheCushiman 2 месяца назад +1

    utah is not that small lol

  • @skembeastman
    @skembeastman 2 месяца назад +1

    Where is the hood?

    • @quadfecta5259
      @quadfecta5259 2 месяца назад +2

      Hood was a battlecruiser

    • @liamc9998
      @liamc9998 22 дня назад

      @@quadfecta5259, in a technical sense, she’s more so a fast battleship - if we’re talking contemporaries here.

    • @ddoubleg
      @ddoubleg 18 дней назад

      @@quadfecta5259so was Scharnhorst and its sister ship. It’s also longer than Yamato that’s why he didn’t add it.

  • @hellhound1389
    @hellhound1389 7 месяцев назад +61

    Size isn't everything. Just ask the Germans and the Japanese because all of their large battleships are coral reefs now

    • @achilldudewhoplaysgames758
      @achilldudewhoplaysgames758 7 месяцев назад +14

      Size turned out to be nothing basically with the rise of AirPower. Everyone was making battleships of that size it was just a product of the times and the Germans and Japanese lost

    • @InfoRanker
      @InfoRanker  7 месяцев назад +10

    • @VIDEOVISTAVIEW2020
      @VIDEOVISTAVIEW2020 7 месяцев назад +19

      size indeed matters when the subject is about ships size. Most effective ship?, well, that is another subject that deserves a separate video discussion.

    • @jaknohi1909
      @jaknohi1909 7 месяцев назад +6

      Yea but by what planes not other battleships

    • @easterworshipper730
      @easterworshipper730 2 месяца назад +12

      Arizona, Utah, prince of Wales, repulse, hood, barham, royal oak.🤭

  • @redstihl9027
    @redstihl9027 13 дней назад

    Tirpitz

  • @HedelTokuffeld
    @HedelTokuffeld Месяц назад

    Y las trajineras mexicanas?