Natural numbers and low-dimensional spaces feel familiar and easy to understand, but when we explore real numbers (particularly transcendental numbers) and higher dimensions, things start to get more complex. In this sense, Differential Geometry shows us just how tough it can be to wrap our heads around these abstract spaces that go beyond our immediate reality; yet, it also reveals the power of abstract mathematical reasoning.
So far, I've been aiming to metaphorically capture how your lectures approach the discussion of concepts in Differential Geometry: curves and metric spaces have felt quite manageable. However, I hope I won't find myself lost in the complexities of manifolds, nor overwhelmed by the intricacies of tensors. Tensors still haunt me, as I cannot grasp their true meaning yet. Merci infiniment for your hard work and commitment.
5:58 The double cone representation of space-time has become iconic in Modern Physics. But *the light-cone in Minkowski space is indeed a four-dimensional structure* , with events depicted as points in four-dimensional spacetime. To visualize this, one spatial dimension is suppressed, while time is represented vertically (x_1), and the remaining spatial dimensions are shown on a horizontal plane. It is still initially non-intuitive, as it mainly provides insight into *the causal structure of spacetime in the context of special relativity* : the connections between events, the propagation of signals and objects; relativistic effects like time dilation, length contraction, and the finite speed of light. - Space-like vectors connect events in spacetime, rendering them causally disconnected, as no signal or object can traverse between them within light speed. They extend beyond the light cone, pointing outside in visualizations. - Time-like vectors, however, depict the paths of massive particles, enabling causal connections between events. They lie within the light cone, pointing inside in visualizations. - Light-like vectors, representing massless particles like photons (and neutrinos, maybe?), delineate the light cone's boundary (surface) in Minkowski space. They divide spacetime into regions classified as time-like, space-like, or light-like separated from a given event.
12:37 So, if a light cone is a geometric representation of the causal structure of spacetime, we can think of a *wordline* as a representation of the path of objects or particles through spacetime - of course, in the context of special relativity. In this context, just as vectors in Minkowski space are categorized as space-like, time-like, or light-like, worldlines can also be classified based on their properties: *the Frenet equations help classify worldlines based on their curvature and torsion, providing information about the nature of the trajectories and the type of motion experienced by objects through spacetime.*
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
Natural numbers and low-dimensional spaces feel familiar and easy to understand, but when we explore real numbers (particularly transcendental numbers) and higher dimensions, things start to get more complex. In this sense, Differential Geometry shows us just how tough it can be to wrap our heads around these abstract spaces that go beyond our immediate reality; yet, it also reveals the power of abstract mathematical reasoning.
So far, I've been aiming to metaphorically capture how your lectures approach the discussion of concepts in Differential Geometry: curves and metric spaces have felt quite manageable. However, I hope I won't find myself lost in the complexities of manifolds, nor overwhelmed by the intricacies of tensors. Tensors still haunt me, as I cannot grasp their true meaning yet.
Merci infiniment for your hard work and commitment.
From a computer programming perspective, tensors aren't that bad. De rien
5:58 The double cone representation of space-time has become iconic in Modern Physics. But *the light-cone in Minkowski space is indeed a four-dimensional structure* , with events depicted as points in four-dimensional spacetime. To visualize this, one spatial dimension is suppressed, while time is represented vertically (x_1), and the remaining spatial dimensions are shown on a horizontal plane.
It is still initially non-intuitive, as it mainly provides insight into *the causal structure of spacetime in the context of special relativity* : the connections between events, the propagation of signals and objects; relativistic effects like time dilation, length contraction, and the finite speed of light.
- Space-like vectors connect events in spacetime, rendering them causally disconnected, as no signal or object can traverse between them within light speed. They extend beyond the light cone, pointing outside in visualizations.
- Time-like vectors, however, depict the paths of massive particles, enabling causal connections between events. They lie within the light cone, pointing inside in visualizations.
- Light-like vectors, representing massless particles like photons (and neutrinos, maybe?), delineate the light cone's boundary (surface) in Minkowski space. They divide spacetime into regions classified as time-like, space-like, or light-like separated from a given event.
Exactly
12:37 So, if a light cone is a geometric representation of the causal structure of spacetime, we can think of a *wordline* as a representation of the path of objects or particles through spacetime - of course, in the context of special relativity. In this context, just as vectors in Minkowski space are categorized as space-like, time-like, or light-like, worldlines can also be classified based on their properties: *the Frenet equations help classify worldlines based on their curvature and torsion, providing information about the nature of the trajectories and the type of motion experienced by objects through spacetime.*
This comment gets a shoutout in the next diff geo stream
Vitiligo daddy! Love your uploads!
Aw yeah, thanks, keep watching because more uploads are coming!