Antiaging diets: separating fact from fiction | Peter Attia and Matt Kaeberlein
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 3 июн 2024
- Get the 5 Tactics in My Longevity Toolkit and my weekly newsletter here (free): bit.ly/3X8YOyK
Watch the full episode: • Effects of a high vs l...
Become a member to receive exclusive content: bit.ly/3O0pEnY
This clip is from episode 222 ‒ How nutrition impacts longevity | Matt Kaeberlein, Ph.D. Matt Kaeberlein is a globally recognized expert on the biology of aging and recurring on The Drive.
In this clip, they discuss:
- Matt's review on mTOR
- Why reviews on caloric restriction and other dietary interventions are very one-sided
- Which diets were assessed for longevity benefits in Matt's review?
- And more
--------
About:
The Peter Attia Drive is a deep-dive podcast focusing on maximizing longevity, and all that goes into that from physical to cognitive to emotional health. With over 90 million episodes downloaded, it features topics including exercise, nutritional biochemistry, cardiovascular disease, Alzheimer’s disease, cancer, mental health, and much more.
Peter Attia is the founder of Early Medical, a medical practice that applies the principles of Medicine 3.0 to patients with the goal of lengthening their lifespan and simultaneously improving their healthspan.
Learn more: peterattiamd.com
Connect with Peter on:
Facebook: bit.ly/PeterAttiaMDFB
Twitter: bit.ly/PeterAttiaMDTW
Instagram: bit.ly/PeterAttiaMDIG
Subscribe to The Drive:
Apple Podcast: bit.ly/TheDriveApplePodcasts
Overcast: bit.ly/TheDriveOvercast
Spotify: bit.ly/TheDriveSpotify
Google Podcasts: bit.ly/TheDriveGoogle
Disclaimer: This podcast is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute the practice of medicine, nursing, or other professional healthcare services, including the giving of medical advice. No doctor-patient relationship is formed. The use of this information and the materials linked to this podcast is at the user's own risk. The content on this podcast is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Users should not disregard or delay in obtaining medical advice for any medical condition they have, and they should seek the assistance of their healthcare professionals for any such conditions. I take conflicts of interest very seriously. For all of my disclosures and the companies I invest in or advise, please visit my website where I keep an up-to-date and active list of such companies. For a full list of our registered and unregistered trademarks, trade names, and service marks, please review our Terms of Use: peterattiamd.com/terms-of-use/ 
Наука
This should be titled, "Description of different diets". There's nothing here about 'Antiaging diets: separating fact from fiction'. Just saying.
Thanks
Agreed. This was kind of a waste of time to watch.
@@anthonysakin1151 yea I read the comment and watched it anyway 😅
Its a small snippet from a 2 hr interview.
I have the impression nothing was said.
Fiction: 🦗
True facts: 🦗
It's a small snippet from a 2 hr interview, you want the answers to a complicated question in 8 minutes ? 😂😂😂
These clips are just ordinary clickbait designed to get you to watch the full video. By themselves, they intentionally never deliver on their titles, and as such are completely useless, which is why I don't bother watching them. If the topic is interesting, I just watch the full video. Even worse are the AMA clips, as those are also useless, but you can't even watch the full episodes (unless you are a paid subscriber). Bottom line, if you click on any of these short clips all you'll do is waste your time. So: avoid at all costs 😂😂😂!
By watching these tease clips you can decide if the subject is something you'd like to dedicate 2hrs of your life to for the full video.
People expecting answers to complicated questions in an 8 minute video 😅😅😅😅😅
For those who might not know, Matt has his own podcast/youtube channel now. It’s very good.
long story short Caloric Restriction with Optimal Nutrition wins. No matter how many supplement they want to sell to you. This is what they wanted to say 🙂
All of these videos are clickbait. He throws out definitions but never actually goes into the benefits. What a clown.
It's a short video cut out of an entire podcast. It's an advertisement for the podcast episode.
Longevity is complicated. INMHO one must dedicate much time and work to understanding the nuances of wellspan and longevity!
So many of his podcasts are 5min question, 5min preface, a tiny bit answer, then next question. Too bad broscience are the only ones actually giving practical advice…
Really. Concerning that in 2024 we’re still testing on animals and applying the results to humans?
Humans are animals. Focus on fixing your own problems and improving your life instead of focusing on things to be upset about. You will be amazed at what happens
That’s just the evolution of testing. We don’t start testing a new, unknown drug on human beings immediately. Imagine if they did that and thousands of people died per year from random drug testing as a first line. I’d rather thousands of mice die per year than thousands of people.
It starts as preclinical research which includes computer models and lab-grown human cells. Tons of drugs fail here because they damage cells or don’t work. If it passes, it moves to animal trials mainly to check safety and toxicity. Then they move on to real clinical trials which involve human volunteers.
Unfortunately, while I love Peter, this one is clickbait from the title. Nothing is really said here.
Not sure what folk expect from a video that's just 8 mins long. If there is something to spike your interest, you can go and do more research. People interested in quick fixes won't get lasting results.
Another click bait title, so frustrating. I own Peter's book have given copies to friends and respect him. But this content had nothing to do with the title shown.
81/2 mins of talk with not much info
they even have "equity" and "representation" when writing papers now, they had 2 men and 2 women on that paper. I don't know that this helps science, one place we don't see this gifting of positions is in the NBA, NFL, etc. Why is that ok here?
5:50 did I understood it right? The guy in left says intermitted fasting has to be more than 24 hours but guy in right says it has to occur more than once in 24 hours and guy in right says it has to occur more than once a day (how can fasting occur more than once a day anyway)? And they agree they have same understanding of these terms but their definition are very different.
I must get something wrong here, anyone?
Lol “fact” vs “fiction “ when it’s just one’s opinion.
Bad interview. He described different techniques by definition, but said nothing about how they work to improve aging or particulars of how to do it.
dude said a whole lot of nothing.
It seems like peter got really out of shape in the last 2 years ... hmmmm. Should go back to fasting and weights
Charles if you possess working eyeballs, that is an odd conclusion to come to.