Yeah man! She has written 'and' instead of 'or' totally changes the meaning of the Statement! Correction- The statement must have been made by a participant or the witness of the same transaction! Bas and ki jagah or laga do guys dont be confused ok !
Correction- The statement must have been made by a participant or the witness of the same transaction! Bas and ki jagah or laga do guys. Confused mat hona admissibility of Res Gestae mai
These are very nice explanations and are easy to understand. Thanku for making such useful videos, ma'am ❤
well explained
Amazing mam.. thanku ❤
Thank you for these informative video
Well explained. Thank you.
Thank you so much
wonderfully explained amazing
thank you :) please stay connected for more
❤thnq❤
excellent presentation
Thank you for explaining so well..
Helped me a lot
hey, Glad you liked it mate :) stay tuned for more.
🙏 Thank you 🙏
2nd condition of admissibility is wrong... you have wrote "not the witness of transaction"
Yeah man! She has written 'and' instead of 'or' totally changes the meaning of the Statement!
Correction- The statement must have been made by a participant or the witness of the same transaction!
Bas and ki jagah or laga do guys dont be confused ok !
Allah bless on you sister your voice is amazing and explain very easy
JazakAllah Khair. Keep supporting :)
Correction- The statement must have been made by a participant or the witness of the same transaction!
Bas and ki jagah or laga do guys. Confused mat hona admissibility of Res Gestae mai
What about hearsay of RAPE