Prepping Chopsticks for First Catch? | SpaceX Starbase Update

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 22 май 2024
  • This week on Starbase Update, we catch up with Jack and look into the intense preparations for Flight 4 at SpaceX's Starbase, including major updates to the "Chopsticks" for their upcoming first catch attempt. Join us as we explore the rapid construction at the Starfactory, and get a sneak peek at the future of Starship with the new office building taking shape. Plus, we’ll take a closer look at Booster 11 and Ship 29 gearing up for the next big test flight. Don’t miss any updates on these incredible developments - subscribe and hit the bell to stay notified!
    🔗 NSF Store: www.nasaspaceflight.com/shop/
    ⚡ Become a member of NASASpaceflight's channel for exclusive discord access, fast turnaround clips, and other exclusive benefits. Your support helps us continue our 24/7 coverage. Click JOIN above to get started.⚡
    🤵 Hosted by Jack Beyer (@thejackbeyer)
    🖊️ Written by Adrian Beil (@BCCarcounters).
    🎥 Video from Mary (@BocaChicaGal), Sean Doherty, Jack Beyer, Starbase Live, and SpaceX.
    ✂️ Edited by Ryan Caton (@dpoddolphinpro)
    💼 Produced by Kevin Michael Reed (@kmreed)
    🔍 If you are interested in using footage from this video, please review our content use policy: www.nasaspaceflight.com/conte...
    L2 Boca Chica (more clips and photos) from BC's very early days to today.
    🔗 forum.nasaspaceflight.com/ind...
    (Join L2 and support NSF here: www.nasaspaceflight.com/l2/)
    #SpaceX #StarbaseUpdate #Ship29 #Starship #SpaceExploration #RocketScience #SpaceNews #AerospaceEngineering #FutureOfSpaceTravel #SpaceXDevelopments #Starfactory #BoosterConstruction #LaunchSiteUpdate #SpaceX #Starbase #Starship #SuperHeavy #Booster11 #Ship29 #Chopsticks #SpaceXStarbase #RocketEngineering #SpaceExploration #ElonMusk #SpaceIndustry #AerospaceEngineering #RocketScience #SpaceXUpdate #Starfactory #BoosterCatch #SpaceXConstruction #StarshipV2 #FutureOfSpaceTravel #SpaceTechnology #SpaceXLaunch #OrbitalLaunch #TechUpdates #Innovation #EngineeringMarvels #SpaceMission #SpaceNews #SpaceXFan #RocketLaunch #NewSpaceRace #SpaceCommunity #Astrophysics #PlanetaryScience #TechNews #StarshipUpdate #BoosterTesting #SpaceXBooster #SpacecraftEngineering #SpaceXGoals #NextGenSpacecraft #SpaceXProgress #SpaceFLight #MuskVision #SpaceXFans
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 146

  • @bideford7099
    @bideford7099 Месяц назад +51

    Jack, Jack, Jack... You're actually getting us all hyped that IFT4 is not too far off, hopefully. Now we just need SpaceX NOT to impede NSF's cameras from catching all the history in the making. Love your enthusiasm!!!

    • @bryanillenberg
      @bryanillenberg Месяц назад +1

      "catching all the history in the making"
      Well done.

    • @bigdogben
      @bigdogben Месяц назад +1

      Remember IFT-4 won't be caught, this catch hype has made us so excited we forgot its 2 flights away.

  • @Westythe3rd
    @Westythe3rd Месяц назад +19

    It's so crazy to see how much Starbase has changed over the years! I will always be thankful for NSF for making it all accessible to see! Thanks as always guys

  • @MickRonald
    @MickRonald Месяц назад +24

    The slow motion video of the Raptor engine shutdown is awesome 8:47. Thank you NSF for the latest Starbase update.

    • @jull1234
      @jull1234 Месяц назад

      who's gonna stabilize it for all us lazy people?

  • @vergil-__
    @vergil-__ Месяц назад +15

    8:08 kool spin!

    • @dylantrimaldi936
      @dylantrimaldi936 Месяц назад +1

      😆

    • @GumbootZone
      @GumbootZone Месяц назад +1

      It's the old classic "untangle-myself-from-my-safety-rope" manoeuvre.

  • @thethirdeve5089
    @thethirdeve5089 Месяц назад +9

    Thanks for giving all this epic content earlier for members, you are an awesome channel please never stop doing what we all love.

  • @brucecampuzano5601
    @brucecampuzano5601 Месяц назад +7

    Minor correction, concrete doesn't dry (thru evaporation), it cures (chemically binding the water to the cement).

  • @Jermine1269
    @Jermine1269 Месяц назад +7

    Thanks heaps for the update y'all!! Always appreciated to get those parts identified

  • @ganymede6535
    @ganymede6535 Месяц назад +15

    Space X one of the leading engineers in spaceflight: proceeds to use rock to separate starship rings

    • @robyn051
      @robyn051 Месяц назад +3

      If it works it works right?

  • @MrKellymcilrath
    @MrKellymcilrath Месяц назад +4

    Great Starbase update Jack and great video footage Mary, Sean, & SBL, Thank you!!!

  • @strykker666
    @strykker666 Месяц назад +3

    Thank you for yet another incredible update. The entire NSF crew is top notch, and deserves high praise.

  • @DebraJean196
    @DebraJean196 Месяц назад +1

    Great update Jack. Really appreciate a video that ties together all the random bits and pieces we see throughout the week into a cohesive whole so we can see the overall progress being made’

  • @phlogistanjones2722
    @phlogistanjones2722 Месяц назад +1

    Thank you for the update Jack.
    I ALWAYS look forward to YOUR content.
    Thank you for all that you do. Thanks to all the NSF crew.
    Peaceful Skies.

  • @sdebeaubien
    @sdebeaubien Месяц назад +1

    thanks Jack for the great report. We're eagerly anticipating the full WDR on B11/S29! Sounds like it may be not this week, but more likely the next, but we'll be watching. It is pretty amazing to see history as it's actually happening. Thanks to all @NSF staff for being part of this great reporting!

  • @jeffrowe6004
    @jeffrowe6004 Месяц назад +4

    Another excellent video, Thanks NSF!

  • @eddiewhite1
    @eddiewhite1 Месяц назад +2

    Thanks for the update, keep up the good work NSF

  • @THEFORBIDDENMAN-lk7of
    @THEFORBIDDENMAN-lk7of Месяц назад +2

    THANKS FOR THE UPDATE

  • @Astra2
    @Astra2 Месяц назад +3

    congrats on 1 million

  • @tracy2928
    @tracy2928 Месяц назад +3

    Excellent video, as usual!

  • @NovelIdeaIndeed
    @NovelIdeaIndeed Месяц назад

    Excellent update! Great detail! Thank you.

  • @oldmanstumpie1061
    @oldmanstumpie1061 Месяц назад

    8:31 That's interesting. It would be great to see a comparison of the chopstick closing speed once we get more data.

  • @grahamrustay3744
    @grahamrustay3744 Месяц назад +2

    Been waiting for this video!

  • @Noahraptor905
    @Noahraptor905 Месяц назад +2

    Another awesome video

  • @corrinastanley125
    @corrinastanley125 Месяц назад

    Thanks Jack and the NSF team, lots of great information.

  • @fredpryde8555
    @fredpryde8555 Месяц назад

    thank you for keeping us informed and your hard work sharing it with us all

  • @captntorthenaer-do-wellcad3191
    @captntorthenaer-do-wellcad3191 Месяц назад

    Great update mates!

  • @hillbillysceptic1982
    @hillbillysceptic1982 Месяц назад +1

    I hope they give that rock a spot in the tool room

  • @Pintuuuxo
    @Pintuuuxo Месяц назад

    Wonderful update, guys! Things are changing so fast that thanks to you we can keep the pace. 🚂 Those chopsticks they will have to have some proximity sensors and a much faster action to grab the booster. If SpaceX can get it right, it will be worth seeing!!!

  • @williamhastie5056
    @williamhastie5056 Месяц назад

    Great update. Thanks! 😬🚀

  • @paulkatz8250
    @paulkatz8250 Месяц назад +1

    Great info!!!!!

  • @queeg6473
    @queeg6473 Месяц назад +1

    When the new office building is finished I think they will get rid of the old office building and replace it with a taller mega-mega bay. If they are gonna ramp up production of ring parts and make the ships and boosters longer they will need more space to stack them.

  • @jimgraves4197
    @jimgraves4197 Месяц назад +1

    Thanks Jack 😎

  • @cratecruncher4974
    @cratecruncher4974 Месяц назад +2

    It's crazy to attempt a booster catch without a backup launch mount in my opinion. The OLM has been the most lead time piece to construct in the entire complex. It would be right underneath if the attempt fails. Time is THE limited resource for SpaceX. A safer approach would be to stack the tower sections for the second tower with priority to complete the catch system and use it on the first attempt(s).

    • @droiddoctor2447
      @droiddoctor2447 Месяц назад

      Maybe the launch tower sections from the cape are there to rebuild the tower if a recovery attempt fails and crashes into the tower. Remove and replace would be a quicker turn around than having to wait for new sections to be fabricated. Foundation work for the second tower cannot be rushed for the time needed to stabilize the ground around it. I do agree a catch attempt on itv5 is pretty aggressive. A failure would definitely be a setback to rest of the program.

    • @cratecruncher4974
      @cratecruncher4974 Месяц назад

      @@droiddoctor2447 Tower sections can be assembled fairly quickly. It's the Orbital Launch Mount that has taken YEARS to develop. While the second could be fabricated faster than the first I recall thousands and thousands of hydraulic pipes and controllers inside that ring. I just think it could take many months to repair/replace the OLM if a booster stage blew it up. Perhaps retrieving the booster with the existing chopsticks swung as far away from the OLM as possible could mitigate some of the risk.

  • @SebastianWellsTL
    @SebastianWellsTL Месяц назад +1

    Comment for the algorithm. Love these great updates guys!

  • @smassky
    @smassky Месяц назад

    Maybe I'm late, but congrats on hitting 1million+ subs! That's so awesome!

  • @paultaylor765
    @paultaylor765 Месяц назад

    Thanks. It would be nice if you could get Chris back on for an interview if Spacex permits 😊

  • @beanzandcheese
    @beanzandcheese Месяц назад +5

    And here we go!

  • @chris55top
    @chris55top Месяц назад +1

    Awesome! You guys hit million subscribers.

  • @joshm3008
    @joshm3008 Месяц назад +1

    Jack is back the jack attack the jack attack is back

  • @TheCritterWindow
    @TheCritterWindow Месяц назад +3

    I am sticking to my prediction that the first catch attempts will be at the new tower. Cant damage the only launch tower. Still lots of proof of concept before a real catch try.

  • @ryer8477
    @ryer8477 Месяц назад

    Alex Alcantarilla, Ryan Weber... Missed you on this one.
    Also the hectic behaviour of Jack when he's out in the wild!

    • @ryer8477
      @ryer8477 Месяц назад +1

      But don't get me wrong, incredible piece of informative content anyway! Thank you all!

  • @photogeNK
    @photogeNK Месяц назад

    4:46 😂
    Thank you.

  • @lyricbread
    @lyricbread Месяц назад +2

    8:27 THANK YOU for referring to it as an “actuator” and not “piston!” That drives me nuts.

  • @TenorDad
    @TenorDad Месяц назад +2

    I'm praying for a May 4th IFT4 launch date.

    • @TenorDad
      @TenorDad Месяц назад +1

      May the 4th be with SpaceX!

  • @viraginjankar4968
    @viraginjankar4968 Месяц назад +1

    It's crazy to think that starship will be just fly regularly as falcon9 next year with reflown boosters

    • @jamescobban857
      @jamescobban857 Месяц назад +1

      SpaceX must move to deploying full size V2 Starlink satellites ASAP because each such satellite will generate five times the revenue, and support significant quantities of 5G mobile devices at higher bandwidth, implying broader applications. Only customers who are willing to accept a higher risk will pay for deliveries using Starship in 2025, especially considering that Vulcan-Centaur, New Glenn, Ariane6, and Neutron will be operational. However it is very likely that Starship will launch more than 100 times before 4Q2026. I suspect that SpaceX may even send one to orbit, but not land, on Mars in the late 2026 window.

  • @DG-rp4xn
    @DG-rp4xn Месяц назад

    I'm surprised they aren't building a separate catch tower, independent of the launch tower. An offshore catch tower would be very nice for future launches for that extra delta V.

  • @LindaMadlala
    @LindaMadlala Месяц назад

    It looks like the moment SpaceX nails a successful test flight _ we could see another flight within weeks _ no shortage of vehicles 🚀

  • @SarahKchannel
    @SarahKchannel Месяц назад +3

    Are you guys allowed to have taller camera towers, so you can possibly peak over the walls being built ? Or are there rules how tall you can go ?

    • @DUKE_of_RAMBLE
      @DUKE_of_RAMBLE Месяц назад

      I was JUST thinking that! Like getting three 1ft-diameter triangular antenna masts to make a very robust tripod, standing maybe 15-20ft high. _(would easily be able to have a large platform on top that multiple other channel's camera hardware could be mounted to; not that this would be that expensive)_
      Since it'd be in a tripod configuration, it wouldn't need guy wires or any concrete mounting pads, meaning it could be relatively easy to disassembled and relocated if needed.

  • @alexlabs4858
    @alexlabs4858 Месяц назад

    “If it works it works”………*hucks rock*

  • @woodentuliphoek
    @woodentuliphoek Месяц назад

    I'm not so sure about the live capture (chopsticks) on Descent.
    The flame diverter/flame trench makes more sense with the massive 4-point structure that is being looked at.
    This may mean for RTLS for Heavy Booster may possibly be an accurate land-pad at Massey's since that location is surrounded by the moat.
    The shorter chopsticks at Kennedy was a bit of a clue to this from ages ago.

  • @brendasawyers
    @brendasawyers Месяц назад +1

    Onward and Upward 🚀

  • @canaancopeland5059
    @canaancopeland5059 Месяц назад

    we are go for IFT-4!

  • @therealjamespickering
    @therealjamespickering Месяц назад +1

    I hope that, like the first launch attempt, they don't attempt to catch the booster prematurely. It would be a massive setback if the launch mount or the tower were damaged. I still think that a dedicated catch tower would be a far safer option. It would not require significant infrastructure surrounding it and so a failed catch would not put progress back by a year or more.

    • @bryanillenberg
      @bryanillenberg Месяц назад +2

      Not really. The booster doesn't have enough energy to cause much damage to the OLM or tower in a realistic failed catch.

    • @srinivasr.9976
      @srinivasr.9976 Месяц назад

      @bryan But won't the computers autonomously trigger the flight termination system should something go wrong just before it being caught? It will destroy the OLM if something like that happens right? I may be wrong in my assumption about FTS though

    • @bryanillenberg
      @bryanillenberg Месяц назад +1

      @@srinivasr.9976 FTS is dearmed before landing burn, but Super Heavy cannot destroy the OLM in a failed catch. It might require a new set of chopsticks, but everything will be fine.

    • @srinivasr.9976
      @srinivasr.9976 Месяц назад

      @@bryanillenberg Oh, that's interesting! I thought FTS activation was the reason for the booster exploding some 400m above the sea (as was reported by SpaceX) in flight 3. I guess the landing burn had just started then but not all engines relight as expected. Am I missing something here?

    • @bryanillenberg
      @bryanillenberg Месяц назад +1

      @@srinivasr.9976 no, you aren't missing anything: the booster exploded for unknown reasons at 462 meters, with only 3/13 engines relighting and only 1 remaining lit.

  • @wojecire
    @wojecire Месяц назад +1

    Happy Chris Bergun noises, I'm dead

  • @ingoos
    @ingoos Месяц назад

    Here's another (ingoos) crazy idea (or two): instead of always having to make repairs on the OLM... how about just building a taller tower, use the chopsticks to raise Starship / Falcon, say, 50 meters (or higher)... 10, 9, 8, 7, 6... engines ignition! quick disconnect chopsticks... clear the tower

  • @timw6596
    @timw6596 Месяц назад

    SpaceX should go to the Acme Company and get a large floating "X" and place it out in the water to see if they can hit it with the next booster landing !

  • @slevinshafel9395
    @slevinshafel9395 Месяц назад

    9:05 +1 thumb up

  • @jull1234
    @jull1234 Месяц назад

    ONE MILLION SUBS!!!!!

  • @MrSango123
    @MrSango123 Месяц назад

    morning jack

  • @jasonboard572
    @jasonboard572 Месяц назад

    Hi Jack, I was just wondering if they are going to catch the boster or Starship they must at least have stick out catching mounts of some sort, as there is no way you can catch just, on what looks like a ball joint off a trailor lifting points? Enjoy your updates by the way !

  • @rickrack4812
    @rickrack4812 Месяц назад

    Instead of scrapping those rings, they could have donated them to make them as observation platforms away from the launch site for people such as NSF. With living area with cots inside so they could new rest while you're waiting for any delays... Or to be ready for early morning setups

  • @HelloKittyFanMan
    @HelloKittyFanMan Месяц назад

    "...On Tuesday -- that's tomorrow as you watch this..."
    No it's not -- for some of us. It was the "tomorrow" of when you _posted_ this.

  • @CanisoGaming
    @CanisoGaming Месяц назад +2

    Na, no way. I for one think they'll need to land the starship and booster ALONE successfully enough times before they start resting it landing on the sticks. I mean imagine if that test goes wrong how much time and resource that tower will take to rebuild lol, will def need some more testing before that.

  • @MacKayver
    @MacKayver Месяц назад

    2:30 some Sci-Fi-High -Technologie-Spaceship-Engineering is going on there :D

  • @TroyRubert
    @TroyRubert Месяц назад +1

    LFG!!!

  • @ragaloft
    @ragaloft Месяц назад +1

    Howdy Jack✋

  • @Wild-Eye
    @Wild-Eye Месяц назад

    Hey Jack 🤚🏻😎✌🏻

  • @faisalsvideoworld
    @faisalsvideoworld Месяц назад

    seems it will take a while for them to fix heatsheild yet

  • @HelloKittyFanMan
    @HelloKittyFanMan Месяц назад

    "Lower down" as opposed to "lower up"? "Adhesive glue" as opposed to some sort of "nonstick glue"?

  • @taddinraleigh
    @taddinraleigh Месяц назад

    How heavy is one ring segment?

  • @HelloKittyFanMan
    @HelloKittyFanMan Месяц назад

    "...And then retracted back."
    * "And then retracted." (Retraction already includes a "back.")

  • @nenadkatic3081
    @nenadkatic3081 Месяц назад

    Security good works

  • @DAlexander35
    @DAlexander35 Месяц назад

    Why wouldn’t they build just a catch tower so if the booster fails it wont risk taking out the OLM and surrounding tank farm? As they perfect the catch then they could move to catching it on the launchpad.

  • @chronablitz
    @chronablitz Месяц назад

    Anybody get Star Wars Episode 1 vibes seeing a worker cut a whole in the side of it?

  • @Future2024
    @Future2024 Месяц назад

    Starship needs wings like the shuttle

  • @rayoverstreet9254
    @rayoverstreet9254 Месяц назад

    Jack, I have asked this question in the live streams before and I never have heard anyone answer. Since the chopsticks ride up and down on the tower and are lifted by the cable, how do they power the hydraulics and items on the chopstick arms?

    • @JackABeyer
      @JackABeyer Месяц назад

      That's a really good question! I have no idea, sorry

  • @PeteSty
    @PeteSty Месяц назад +1

    Does NSF use its own videos, or are they provided by SpaceX?

    • @corrinastanley125
      @corrinastanley125 Месяц назад +1

      NSF has their own camera team taking footage and photo's .

    • @corrinastanley125
      @corrinastanley125 Месяц назад +1

      But they will show parts of footage that Space X releases to the public to explain or point something out to us.

  • @jesseturner9865
    @jesseturner9865 Месяц назад

    Is stage 0 big enough for starship v2? v3?

  • @JoeDaManTheHC
    @JoeDaManTheHC Месяц назад

    👀🐔👀🐔 Chicken man was here.

  • @mostevil1082
    @mostevil1082 Месяц назад

    I imagine they'll be cautious releasing raptor startup footage as that's the riskiest part of the cycle that they'll be putting the most effort into improving.
    Showing issues there might attract attention that'll slow everything down.

  • @ItsEverythingElse
    @ItsEverythingElse Месяц назад

    I predict chopstick landing attempt no sooner than IFT-6.

  • @thomascharlton8545
    @thomascharlton8545 Месяц назад

    Something to discuss:
    The “Achilles heel” of Starship that no-one is talking about: The Human Factors element of riding Starship to a retro-rocket landing. Going to be a terrifying ride every time. Even when everything goes right.

    • @Barthhhelona
      @Barthhhelona Месяц назад +1

      Technically, no humans have to experience starships crazy landing on earth. For Artemis, they would be going up and coming back on the SLS rocket and capsule anyway

    • @bryanillenberg
      @bryanillenberg Месяц назад +2

      Is it any scarier than using parachutes?

    • @thomascharlton8545
      @thomascharlton8545 Месяц назад +2

      @@BarthhhelonaYou’ve heard of using Starships for 100 passenger point to point transportation around earth right?

    • @thomascharlton8545
      @thomascharlton8545 Месяц назад

      @@bryanillenbergConsiderably scarier! I’m sure you’ve seen video from onboard a Falcon 9 first stage landing on a drone ship? Plunging toward earth supersonic then start a rocket engine in the last few seconds to save the day. Very Scary!

    • @bryanillenberg
      @bryanillenberg Месяц назад +1

      @@thomascharlton8545 except, Starship won't be supersonic at engine ignition. And there will be a hover period, with a huge margin.

  • @it-o9910
    @it-o9910 Месяц назад

    shuttle tanker is incredibly cool! I want to go to orbit, see Earth... Where are point2point plans, Elon?

  • @GumbootZone
    @GumbootZone Месяц назад

    7:14 "Barely any activity at all." That's because he's playing on his cellphone instead of working!

  • @davidsheriff8989
    @davidsheriff8989 Месяц назад

    What will be the main purpose of Flight 4 if not a catch of the booster ?

  • @stevewright201
    @stevewright201 Месяц назад

    Just ?when space x gets to Mars the atmosphere is alot thinner than here so would this interfere with entry with Star ship heat shield

  • @atharvavashishtha5451
    @atharvavashishtha5451 Месяц назад

    i bet we will see another starship saor the skies by the end of this month...What do u guys think?

  • @phil1657
    @phil1657 Месяц назад

    They got raptors that spit hot lightning?

  • @romec3435
    @romec3435 Месяц назад

    👀🔎🚀👍

  • @IceCreams62
    @IceCreams62 Месяц назад

    It is time to buy long poles to place the ''spy'' cameras 🙂

  • @cipedead0777
    @cipedead0777 Месяц назад

    You think IFT is in about 2 weeks ?

  • @davidlittlejohn6636
    @davidlittlejohn6636 Месяц назад

    🙂👍

  • @marh122
    @marh122 Месяц назад

    as I see those trucks coming with methane and oxygen etc. Is spacex planning to make their own propelants in a near future ? I dont think its feasible to always wait for the trucks to come and refill those tanks

  • @vinoheart
    @vinoheart Месяц назад

    am lead engineer for raptor new version and also catch engineering algo written by me.

  • @tjmoore1084
    @tjmoore1084 Месяц назад

    why so much of jack’s face shown? not enuf spacex film? lol

  • @RXTRUX1
    @RXTRUX1 Месяц назад

    If they haven't fixed attitude control and restart that's premature.

  • @ra7502
    @ra7502 Месяц назад

    I don't think we will see a catch attempt until the 2nd launch tower is up. To much risk of putting the test campaign behind should a catch attempt damage the launch tower.

  • @antonybastin3432
    @antonybastin3432 Месяц назад

    👍👍👍🇮🇳

  • @MatsukawaZaraki
    @MatsukawaZaraki Месяц назад +1

    All the hate you gave Ship 26 and now come to find out it's probably going to be the first to attempt landing on the moon.....
    Eating those "BOOO Ship 26, BOO" chants now lol
    Think about what he said in the last talk.....Moon landers will not have flaps, and will need feet for landing. So the reason all of the extra stringers have been added is because it needs to withstand the "touchdown" forces exerted on the body when it lands.
    I'm so excited for that!!

    • @bryanillenberg
      @bryanillenberg Месяц назад

      S26 is almost certainly going to be scrap.
      And the touchdown forces are going to be very small when compared to 4+ G acceleration during launch!

    • @MatsukawaZaraki
      @MatsukawaZaraki Месяц назад

      @@bryanillenberg Sounds like you have no idea what's going on lol

    • @bryanillenberg
      @bryanillenberg Месяц назад

      @@MatsukawaZaraki Find one piece of evidence that S26 will fly.
      And no, lack of tiles doesn't count.

    • @MatsukawaZaraki
      @MatsukawaZaraki Месяц назад

      @bryanillenberg already stated....extra stringers is just one example which you conveniently forgot I mentioned

    • @bryanillenberg
      @bryanillenberg Месяц назад

      @@MatsukawaZaraki Extra stringers, which are covering the lifting points, thus making stacking impossible.
      Thanks for making my point for me.

  • @505Barber
    @505Barber Месяц назад +1

    Hey man I'm a barber...fly me out ill have your facial hair looking tv worthy...

  • @HelloKittyFanMan
    @HelloKittyFanMan Месяц назад

    "What exactLY work they are doing..."? Heh, oops.