The No BS Guide to INTP

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 7 сен 2024

Комментарии • 37

  • @notsalah7859
    @notsalah7859 6 месяцев назад +4

    Thanks for the brilliant video. Now I am a 100% confident I am an INFP. This describes me better than I can describe myself.

  • @notsalah7859
    @notsalah7859 6 месяцев назад +4

    I always seem to want to explain and understand everything and I love abstract thinking. I get very involved in maths or physic problems and I seek to understand them on deeper level and not just get the correct answer. I also use my intuition heavily to spot patterns and logical connections. Also, regarding my weakest function which is the extroverted feeling, I truly resonate with what you said and I often notice that I would say some things without realising how my words would come across until I see the reactions of other. Sometimes it comes across as funny outrageous or rude or embarrassing or cringy.

  • @sololife9403
    @sololife9403 6 месяцев назад +2

    thank you

  • @notsalah7859
    @notsalah7859 6 месяцев назад

    I used to think that I am an INFP but I think I used to get this result because I am quite high in agreeableness which would translate to feeling type if you use the 16personalities test which as you explained is actually flawed.

  • @JenHope118
    @JenHope118 Месяц назад

    Cream of the crops. Good memory and analytical.

  • @Jokervision744
    @Jokervision744 Месяц назад

    It's intriguing.

  • @zrperro
    @zrperro 3 месяца назад

    Seems very accurate to me.

  • @papyrusisverycool2372
    @papyrusisverycool2372 3 месяца назад

    thank you

  • @zhuoyifan5324
    @zhuoyifan5324 6 месяцев назад +19

    No BS Guide to BS

  • @OmSelf432
    @OmSelf432 Месяц назад

    Projection

  • @alittlederanged
    @alittlederanged 6 месяцев назад

    Would you say Sherlock's an INTP though?

    • @MindMaverick1
      @MindMaverick1  6 месяцев назад +2

      Depends on the adaptation but BBC Sherlock is most definitely INTP.

    • @MrTrashcan1
      @MrTrashcan1 5 месяцев назад

      @@MindMaverick1 Sherlock Holmes dealt with the real world--that which is tangible. You claim INTPs are interested in philosophy, economics, etc. I think that's wrong, but in any case, there's none of that in SH. I would call him ISTP. His perception is very much Se. An INTP would miss most of what he saw, but when made aware could help him connect the dots. One of my favorite games growing up was Clue.

    • @nth2tell
      @nth2tell Месяц назад

      ⁠@@MrTrashcan1I would argue otherwise. INTP can be very detail oriented. Yes. INTPs do live the their heads most of the time and they can focus on details when needed. The N part allows INTPs to see and recognise patterns immediately which is what Sherlock is good at. The S type will not be able to do this. …

  • @lorenzomizushal3980
    @lorenzomizushal3980 6 месяцев назад +2

    INTP is one of the most common personality type. Everywhere you go there's someone who's INTP.

    • @amitsingh-yk3ps
      @amitsingh-yk3ps 6 месяцев назад +9

      Least common

    • @lorenzomizushal3980
      @lorenzomizushal3980 6 месяцев назад

      @@amitsingh-yk3ps least common is INFJ. INTPs are too common in the modern age.

    • @SacrilegiousExtinction55
      @SacrilegiousExtinction55 6 месяцев назад +11

      Mistyping.
      A lot confuse innate frameworks of the brain with personality traits and special superstructures of special circumstances into their personality type.
      Needless to say most of them are teens who haven't grown up completely to morph their true self.
      True INTPs are really, really scarce.

    • @krit05007
      @krit05007 6 месяцев назад

      🙋🙋

    • @lorenzomizushal3980
      @lorenzomizushal3980 6 месяцев назад

      @@SacrilegiousExtinction55 what are you talking about? They take that stupid MBTI test that churns out these character types and flatters them with positive traits. INTPs are very common. You might be an INTP yourself. It's that common.

  • @maurocarballo7979
    @maurocarballo7979 6 месяцев назад +5

    Pseudoscience

    • @cowoverthemoo
      @cowoverthemoo 3 месяца назад

      Studying the personality is a mixture of science, art, philosophy..there is a study of personality. Its based on cognitive, traits,emotions ect. Even science is in the dark about the brain, mind. Science is based on a fact but fact is they can't study a single brain alive..so they study groups of people. Analysing their behaviour. Which is a study of personality.. trait theory is a scientific study of personality.
      Nothing wrong with pseudoscience in itself can lead to new knowledge..understanding of the brain. Which even scientists are in the dark about. Science is great but it's because of great minds which is still widely being studied, the mind is a phenomenal thing.

    • @cowoverthemoo
      @cowoverthemoo 3 месяца назад

      I love to read the book "how to analyse people on sight" such a fascinating read. So many ways to study personality and that's what makes it so interesting. My daughter and i have done this test both have been given the intp personality type and if u analyse us both we are very much intp lol my daughters a training architect, engineering. I like to analyse personality, I will rip it apart just so I can understand the Engineering of the mind body ect. We are like robots lol.

    • @cowoverthemoo
      @cowoverthemoo 3 месяца назад

      I assume u have done the test?. Or why else would u be here, curiosity?. Have u been given the intp? I'm just curious because u made a very vague point. It doesn't sound like an intp, lol
      There is more than one method of learning. Science is important but minds are even more important, its phenomenal can Science explain it, not at all. That is what makes it so fascinating

    • @cowoverthemoo
      @cowoverthemoo 3 месяца назад

      And when I connect the dots to all the personality tests, even astrology I see a pattern. Its so good, I love it.