On the fly 4:31, great take 10:34, chatbot administrator 1:15:18 , what a great way to end, thank you both very much for sharing your time and work, peace
Quantum computer is said to take advantage of “qubits” which are particles that exist in a superimposed quantum state in order to gain their computational power. These qubits are part of the machine. Superimposed quantum particles lose their superimposed states whenever they interact with any other particles (this is the “looking” in the classic analogies like Schrodinger’s Cat). The “other” particles are any other part of the machine. Therefore a Quantum Computer can never work, because the qubits must remain in an isolated state, but since they are in an isolated state, they can’t function as part of the machine. I have just disproven the possibility of a “quantum computer” QED
Not every interaction destroys the quantum state, just interactions with the environment. The other qubits are not part of the environment since you design your computer in that way. In fact much of the difficulty goes into making the boundary between system and environment as sharp as possible, e.g. by making your computer very cold.
The problem with ai and quantum computers is that they may operate the quantum computer way better than a human might. What I mean by this is that ai can use the error correcting code to massively speed up something barely useful to humans. It might use algorithms in a novel way we simply have no idea exists. So the quantum can or could maneuvre in such a way as to make the quantum computer really really turn on and be many times as useful to the ai than we could even believe possible. Just saying it is not out of the realm of impossible.
I think being able to make use of the wave function shows it’s very real and could lead us to a better understanding of quantum physics It’d just be poetry if we used our less than perfect understanding of quantum mechanics to fill in the missing pieces Plus the discovery of black holes and gravitational waves. Hadron collider and the Higgs field. Computer sciences and ai. We’re killing it with what we know and figuring the missing bits out using that knowledge Using theory to engineer tools to run experiments that lead to new theories and new engineering and new experiments etc. if you scale this concept over large amounts of time, 100 years ago gave us the theories that led to the engineering and experiments of today. We’ll see what new theories that leads to. 100 years is a blink
@@brandoloudly9457 We know nothing fundamental: not about the initial state of the universe, not how life on Earth started, no about our own brains, not about the current state of the universe (everything is dark, because we have no clue), etc. etc. All the basics are unknown. And particle physics is the biggest clown in the physics class. Even QM and General Relativity can't talk to each other! Scientific believers, like you all are, can't prove anything. You are an exact copy of religious believers. They too can't prove anything.
@@jacobvandijk6525 nothing about what i said was religious. if we can agree on an objective reality, what in science would require faith? which FACTS has science given us that are religious? if you could at least answer these 2 questions in your response, that'd be great you just replied to me using a computational communication device connected to the internet. you think we got here knowing nothing? we've made observations, cosmological and quantum, that are insanely close to what's been predicted. we do have a long way to go, but thankfully people, science and technology are leading the way. our technological advancements continuously allow us to answer old questions and ask new ones. there's nothing "hype" about technology, which is a direct result of science and physics. hopefully one day we'll have some of the answers that allow you to see just how impressive humans really are, even today the creation of a universe leading to life and the emergence of a consciousness trying to understand how it all began, and the theory of everything along with it... yeah everything about that statement is going to be hard to fully understand, but we're working on it. you should be more positive and honest with your framing. no one is saying we know everything and people should be encouraged to learn and discover
On the fly 4:31, great take 10:34, chatbot administrator 1:15:18 , what a great way to end, thank you both very much for sharing your time and work, peace
Quantum computer is said to take advantage of “qubits” which are particles that exist in a superimposed quantum state in order to gain their computational power. These qubits are part of the machine. Superimposed quantum particles lose their superimposed states whenever they interact with any other particles (this is the “looking” in the classic analogies like Schrodinger’s Cat). The “other” particles are any other part of the machine. Therefore a Quantum Computer can never work, because the qubits must remain in an isolated state, but since they are in an isolated state, they can’t function as part of the machine. I have just disproven the possibility of a “quantum computer” QED
Not every interaction destroys the quantum state, just interactions with the environment. The other qubits are not part of the environment since you design your computer in that way. In fact much of the difficulty goes into making the boundary between system and environment as sharp as possible, e.g. by making your computer very cold.
this guy is the smartest Physicist in the world at the moment
1:16:03 The Two Commandments: morality and rationality
The problem with ai and quantum computers is that they may operate the quantum computer way better than a human might. What I mean by this is that ai can use the error correcting code to massively speed up something barely useful to humans. It might use algorithms in a novel way we simply have no idea exists. So the quantum can or could maneuvre in such a way as to make the quantum computer really really turn on and be many times as useful to the ai than we could even believe possible. Just saying it is not out of the realm of impossible.
Yeah funny right
MODERN PHYSICS IS A HYPE. Since Dirac (1930) nothing has happened.
I think being able to make use of the wave function shows it’s very real and could lead us to a better understanding of quantum physics
It’d just be poetry if we used our less than perfect understanding of quantum mechanics to fill in the missing pieces
Plus the discovery of black holes and gravitational waves. Hadron collider and the Higgs field. Computer sciences and ai. We’re killing it with what we know and figuring the missing bits out using that knowledge
Using theory to engineer tools to run experiments that lead to new theories and new engineering and new experiments etc. if you scale this concept over large amounts of time, 100 years ago gave us the theories that led to the engineering and experiments of today. We’ll see what new theories that leads to. 100 years is a blink
@@brandoloudly9457 We know nothing fundamental: not about the initial state of the universe, not how life on Earth started, no about our own brains, not about the current state of the universe (everything is dark, because we have no clue), etc. etc. All the basics are unknown. And particle physics is the biggest clown in the physics class. Even QM and General Relativity can't talk to each other! Scientific believers, like you all are, can't prove anything. You are an exact copy of religious believers. They too can't prove anything.
@@jacobvandijk6525 nothing about what i said was religious. if we can agree on an objective reality, what in science would require faith? which FACTS has science given us that are religious? if you could at least answer these 2 questions in your response, that'd be great
you just replied to me using a computational communication device connected to the internet. you think we got here knowing nothing? we've made observations, cosmological and quantum, that are insanely close to what's been predicted. we do have a long way to go, but thankfully people, science and technology are leading the way. our technological advancements continuously allow us to answer old questions and ask new ones. there's nothing "hype" about technology, which is a direct result of science and physics. hopefully one day we'll have some of the answers that allow you to see just how impressive humans really are, even today
the creation of a universe leading to life and the emergence of a consciousness trying to understand how it all began, and the theory of everything along with it... yeah everything about that statement is going to be hard to fully understand, but we're working on it. you should be more positive and honest with your framing. no one is saying we know everything and people should be encouraged to learn and discover
@@jacobvandijk6525 Another silly youtube "expert"
@@GeezerBoy65 Different opinions are never welcome in a world of scientific or religious believers.