As our final act, while fire rains from the sky and the last of humanity burns to the ground, we must sink Freedom Ship into the sea such that those who come after might finally witness a true Atlantis.
I think a lot of people would probably find it interesting to watch planes landing so closely to them. After all, American supercarriers are a thing. And despite having a gigantic steamcatacult LAUNCH aircraft off of them and have them land - rather violently (Naval aircraft have some of the most robust landing gear of any aircraft design for this reasons) - and at all hours of the night. Doesn't prevent them from sleeping. EDIT: Read on. No, actually, it's not as loud as you think it is.
@SteelRodent I don't think you realize the difference in decibels that a military afterburner turbojet engine makes in comparison to a civilian aviation turbofan jet. I can guarantee you if you did you wouldn't think your argument was relevant - because military aircraft on carriers use afterburners on turbojet engines and are insanely loud, much more so than turbofan engines on jetliners (and worse yet for your argument the engines on airliners which are already much quieter turbofans have had sound dampening engineering incorporated into the mounting and engine - next time you fly on an airliner and if you see jagged engines on the outside rear of the engine - congratulations, you've just spotted sound dampening systems). Yet, again, somehow people below the deck on aircraft carriers aren't going deaf like they're inside a constantly ringing bell or something.
@@counterfit5weird thought but imagine the sort of crises that would happen with a ship like this. I mean this sounds ripe for a Hollywood plot, where a whole bunch of planes full of para-military group or terrorists or some ‘rogue nation’ fly onto the top airport and hold it hostage. I mean there’s way too much potential for mis-use here since its a floating island that you can lock off if you want. I mean its an aircraft carrier times 50
Well it’s mayb not a movie but it is very close to what we now have we have floating cities these cruise ships have everything what u need shops, restaurants, spa, baths, cinemas and a whole theater
I wonder who would be stupid enough to buy an internal apartment with no natural light and more than 50 m from it (I assume this thing would be quite more than 100m wide). These days cruise ships are struggling to sell internal cabins for more than budget prices and the vast majority of the apartments on this monster would be internal.
@@gavib4246 the titanic did, however, have tiny wooden boats that only accommodated 2/3rds of the ships population... the lifeboats on THIS thing would be literally small apartment blocks lol, food for days
Dude, "Breaker High" predates that. ruclips.net/video/2YjLAk7ZUBg/видео.html Yes, "That" IS Ryan Gosling. When he was a kid, he had to do stupid stuff like this and "Young Hercules". I still find it hard to believe that he became a big movie star. I guess he really is "that" good looking.
Her rate of turn would be very concerning , also her stopping distance... your standard ship(cargo, container etc) has a stopping distance of over a mile. Also how many thrusters would they even put on it. So many questions.
@@ayoutubechannelname perhaps... it may be feasible for azimuth propulsion. While the concept is rather interesting, a vessel of this size would surely put everything we know about ship construction and design to test... would love to see a model of it in a tow tank one day.
@@SOACV I would love to see BROAD Core Tubular Stainless Steel Slabs used in ship construction. It would make giant ships like Freedom Ship actually feasible.
I doubt there are swells big enough to even make this ship break a sweat. But such a big ship would struggle to stay away from them, so would probably be suffering constant damage - like those little docks on the back... they'd get absolutely swamped in a big storm.
@@JaidenJimenez86tbf although the ship is so big that it could withstand storms and waves and not bob up and down. So instead of being affected like a cruise liner in turbulence, floating with the waves, it’d be much worse. I mean for example houses that move with earthquakes can survive them better than rigid fixed tightly-constructed houses. This boat wouldn’t move with the waves but it would just start getting damaged by them a lot
@@JaidenJimenez86 Also, the sheer size of the ship would mean that any heavy swell would create constant bouyancy voids under the hull (gaps between waves where the hull isn't supported by the sea), and the sheer weight of having an office block *with an airport on top* would cause immeasurable stress to the hull. Unless the designers have invented some magical alloy that would be able to resist these stresses, the keel snapping in half at some point would be a matter of when, not if.
Ignoring the physics involved with moving a "ship" of this magnitude through open waters and prevailing winds, the astronomical amount of logistical issues they would need to solve would rival sending someone to Mars. The cost alone to maintain a ship this large would bankrupt a small nation. How do you even dry dock a 6,000ft ship to repaint the hull? The amount of barnacles that would grow on a mile long ship would be staggering, probably produce enough drag to stop this ship in its tracks.
When I look at the "Freedom Ship" project something straight forward occurs to me: Change the business plan. Design somewhere between 6 and 10 ships that join together to form the Freedom Ship. Start with 1 ship. Then use the revenue to build and join a 2nd ship to it. Then keep adding on. Beyond gaining revenue / income this would also provide redundancy for essential services (water purification, sewage treatment, electricity, propulsion and ethernet / wifi) It seems to me the redundancy would be necessary for this vessel to be viable for the # of people and to avoid a humanitarian crisis.
Seems like the most logical way to build it up slowly. But even then it seems like you'd have a tough time combining the structures and reinforcing them for the scale imagined.
Look at the brain on Ron! It wouldn't get past that first ship, maybe two. Remember how exciting the moon landing was? Yeah, they had to start canceling those after a few years when the public grew tired of it.
just pick a room, any room! actually no that sounds disgusting just picking a room and then checking if its occupied and disrupting a person just trying to sleep.
They should create an app to help you find your room and find restaurants, stores, nearby emergency exits, lifeboats, safety jackets,etc. Or they could give you a map
Engineers: fuck your physics. This is completely possible to build. Now will it actually survive the ocean? Fuck no that thing is doomed to fail... but fuck yeah we can build it
@@AuGrrr : Nah, it would survive the ocean, that's not a problem. The _financing rounds_ are what it'll never survive, and that's just because it's too big of a step to start off with.
@@absalomdraconis well it would be super fucking hard to make it survive since there are rogue waves that can cause shit to happen and a tsunami can fuck it up badly.
*gets close to funding in 2008* *massive financial apocalypse hits* *gets close to funding in 2019* *massive global pandemic hits* Dude can’t catch a break
@@roberttakacs2312 not necessarily. A vessel this large would have so many compartments that you would need hundreds of millions of liters of water to sink it. You would have days to respond to a rupture in the hull. I know "no ship is too large to sink", but this very well could be it at this scale.
Imagine how expensive EVERYTHING would be. Food, toilet paper, medicine, freshwater. Everything even on an island is more expensive with regular supply routes being flown or shipped in. A gallon of milk in the Bahamas is $11.19. Now imagine supplying a moving ship that can never dock at most ports and whos timeline can be altered by the weather. Even before covid-19 there are horror stores of different bacteria and viruses infecting large numbers of passengers and crew. Plus it is a city. There would be crime. You would need police, judges, courts and jails. Also, where are all the service workers going to live? They can't afford a condo. Would they be supplied dorms and have a portion of their salary go towards "rent" that they pay to the company ship? What if the workers all went on strike because of pay or living conditions? This would never work.
@@Prokerboss tbh the super pyramid at least sounds plausible considering its Japan that wants to do it. They already have tons of futuristic architecture and engineering in their track record
I think the whole project is too ambitious, costly and could potentially result in the world's biggest lawsuit if the vessel sinks and kills thousands of people onboard. Because Freedom Ship is intended to be a sustainable moving city across the world's oceans, there's far too many problematic circumstances it could face in the future. It takes *alot* of planning and management to run a city (especially the finance's to run the place), and if even one system begins to fail it wouldn't take much for the rest to follow. I personally feel like it's a big gamble for investors to put money into something this risky, but I do think it's a cool concept and I admire the creators passion for his design. I think Freedom Ship could become a good sci-fi movie one day, I'd definitely watch it. 👍
An Arcology (Architecture + Ecology) usualy describes more of a self sufficient city in a building, so not just living space but farms & factories as well. Still, would be an interesting upscaled version of this ship :D
Maybe he could just tie together the abandoned cruise ships and make one mega ship that way. Lord knows the cruise industry won't be coming back for decades.
@@pavelow235 I'm curious why you think it would take decades. Cruising will return to a somewhat normal level by the end of 2021. Though, less profitable because there will be less demand. It might take a few years for the industry to fully recover to pre-pandemic times, but it certainly won't take decades.
Uhh, yeah chief. I’m gonna pass on an airport roof. I live by an airport, and just the planes flying over everyday is annoying. Having private jets landing on your roof each day? Hell no
@@Widoghastly not by much. The world's loudest thing is when one of the old WWII bombers fly over my house, and those are all turboprop. Whenever it's the airshow and they bring one in, everybody in the neighborhood knows
Antonio Rioseco turboprops are actually around 10 to 30 decibels louder than jet engines, but make a lower frequency of noise. and in all honesty i would imagine that if it’s a floating city it will most likely have more civilian type aircraft which will make much less noise, and most people would use the ferry’s to travel back and forth between the ship and land due to most tourists wanting to pay for a cheaper price to get on board.
i get the joke, but its not accurate at all. note that: -they refused to take money from sketchy people/groups. -they didnt start collecting money based on unfounded claims. -they have actively redesigned the ship based on industry input. -they didnt already sell units to people who will never get them. all of those make it very very different from fyre fest.
This is like those old retro future city designs from the 20’s-30’s (like the movie “Metropolis”): They seem cool and nifty at first, until you start thinking about actually living there and then realizing it would probably be a miserable experience (i.e. lack of proper green/earth/nature space, too compact, kinda ugly, really desolate, etc,.).
@@DunnickFayuro I guess that you know what a rogue wave does. The larger the ship basically the worst of an impact it has. 50m waves form randomly due to constructive interference. One place that it most often occurs is in the see just off the South African coastline. These waves have been the reasons for many a ship damage or being snapped in half. The wave comes along and the ship can with standard it but the problem is as the wave travels along and part of the ship sticks out over the wave causing forces on the ship that it's not designed for causing it to snap in half
I'd like to generally consider myself a pretty chill person who doesn't worry a lot, and I think that it's a great idea, but holy shit I could bring up a million nightmarish scenarios with awful outcomes
Instead of a single unit, I think it'd be safer and more practical to create units, the way trains are built. The units could easily be disconnected for maintenance and repair. Automated bridges would allow passengers and residents to cross from one section to another. I don't know how engineers would balance everything, but we've seen too many superliners go down after being hailed as super safe or "unsinkable.: Gotta learn from past mistakes.
@@jlin1519 star citizen is shit because it's a fucking video game that somehow hasn't released yet after eight years and 300 million dollars. Freedom Ship is a fucking cruise liner apartment complex that is too big to complete.
I remember both the show and the articles in the magazines back in the day. It was one of those mega projects that have been floating around as either planned projects or ideas for a future endeavor. One idea back then that comes to mind, and obviously not built, is the Tokyo Skytree. Hanging skyscrapers like Christmas ornaments off a pyramid shaped super structure over a good portion of Tokyo bay.
Florida Man came up with the idea of the Freedom Ship, not surprised. I watched the Discovery documentary. I doubt it'll actually be built considering the situation in Hong Kong at the moment but I admire his confidence. You worked on this for months and I must say, it paid off.
While feasible in a technical sense, it's probably just not something that would work financially. Governing a normal city can be hard enough, but one on a ship? I imagine that things would turn tits-up given time, and that's only if the project floated itself financially to begin with. The fallout from it going bankrupt would probably be fairly nasty. Not being registered in a home port would also bring a big set of problems regarding sovereignty. IE, what would they do if the ship was boarded by pirates? With most ships, you can call on your home country for help. But you'd be your own sovereign nation with an unregistered ship. You'd have to have your own police and paramilitary force, and I imagine many nations wouldn't let you into their waters if that were the case. Would your captain be elected? Or would it be a corporate autocracy/oligarchy? There's a lot beyond just the building of it, of anything, building a floating city is easy. But managing it would be quite the ordeal. I think we're more likely to get no-mobile floating cities first, via seasteading. And see how the world treats such man-made places and their sovereignty or lack thereof.
I saw a Florida man a few weeks ago at Costco in his cart he had his dogs in the cart and they had confederate flags on them that’s why I’m never going back to Pensacola
Aircraft fails landing, smashes into the "hull" of the ship, a giant fire erupts, can't get it under control, basically a small city just sunk. Life boats anyone?
The size was just dumb. Even the major cruise lines didn't start with their mega ships (1/20th the size of this). They built their way up. Starting with something the size of a large cruise ship modified to support permanent residents would have been a lot more viable.
Agreed...one would need smaller examples just as proof of concept to then secure funding for something even approaching the scale of the freedom ship. That's ultimately what "sank" the project ...no one is going to risk that kind of money on a pipedream that may not even be possible or even economically sensible.
If this idea happened in the 70’s they could have gotten funding to buy an old ocean liner like the Michelangelo, United States, Queen Elizabeth, or France to try it out with.
Yeah maybe go 150% the size of the biggest ship for a start and that's already pretty ambitious but at least you would get an understanding of the challenges you would have to face
There are people that "live" in ships to avoid paying taxes. They register a cruise ship to a tax haven, then register the cruise ship as their home after buying a cabin, so they never stay longer in a country than like 3 months a year and the ship is always moving, that way they avoid paying most taxes. But it's not 100% tax free, not to mention other costs.
FINALLY SOMEONE SAYS IT Also, how tf do they plan to bring in an entire city's worth of supplies every day from random places around the world? The daily supply chains alone would be a near-insurmountable logistical nightmare
The idea of the Freedom is interesting, however all I can think of is what would happen if it sunk. Literally it would be the biggest ship sinking/deaths at sea in history.
Vee and it’s would be predominantly older people. They’d lose like 20,000 on just the one ship. I wouldn’t even want to go on this thing pandemics aside.
Mary W i would imagine that a noise suppression system would be put into place to deal with the sound, and possibly a hanger deck for plane storage which gives some distance between you and the runway
I was thinking fine. It has aircraft landing on it . . . Okay no big deal. We have aircraft carriers. I'm just wondering what their plan is when one of these aircraft comes in short or crashes into the side of it at landing speed. It would basicly become the WTC of the ocean floor.
Yep! Reminds me of Walt Disneys "Disney World" EPCOT city project. What is it with rich dudes from Florida wanting to create mini autocratic dictatorships for themselves lol?!?
Here is how it would ACTUALLY work: every rich guy would buy a $250k studio, declare it as his legal residence, and pay no taxes forever. While actually living somewhere else, of course, It would be a ghost ship with barely more than the crew on board.
B Randell On The World, you are allowed to lease your unit to others with approval, though it wouldn’t be an ‘investment’ with all the fees. The Freedom is supposed to have thousands of tourists; apparently. So in theory it would always be busy. Though all those people trapped on a ship these days just screams ‘pandemic’ nightmare
Uhm, you try (as an American citizen) to declare your residence to be 'X', and then spend most of your time elsewhere ... good way to end up in prison! The IRS requires you to show/demonstrate that you spent at least 183 days out of the year at your primary residence, whether in the U.S. or elsewhere. I know about this because I had a conversation with a friend who was an accountant and handled some folk's tax-filings.
Doctor Medkit Excuse me??? What med kit r u talking about. I meant what’s in a basic bag like stethoscope, etc.... not medicine. Obviously I don’t need to give a doctor medicine. He has his own meds he carries in his bag when he’s doing house calls. I also wasn’t sure if u had like first aide kits or what they were. I’m not an idiot.
You likely wouldn’t be able to get that thing within 10 nautical miles of the shoreline just due to her draft alone. And good luck finding a port large enough to accommodate her. And don’t even get me started on dry docks for repairs. Also it low-key looks hideous imo. Cool concept tho.
Exactly. Yeah the smaller ships could ferry people, but not fuel/other things you get at dock. Also cause ships can empty human waste directly into water imagine the environmental impact of that alone
I read that the condo ship “The World” was having problems. The novelty tended to wear off rather quickly and, in order to keep cash coming in, units were being rented out to short term occupants, dulling the cachet.
It would need to use nuclear reactors with solar panels or it would need huge engines with an efficient milage and a automatic air purifier to stop toxins and carbon dioxide and recycle them
@@AuGrrr filtering carbon out of the air is just heating the the atmosphere more. At the moment its highly inefficient and needs stupid amounts of energy and methane .
I took my first sea voyage at age 10, in 48 from Karachi to Basra. I saw flying fish falling at the deck, Birds diving to catch fish. It was hot as Haiti. There was no Air Conditioning, so we suffered. Since then, I have sailed many a times around the world except Australia, New Zealand and South America. Longer or shorter, the feeling of claustrophobia is always there. I have also taken journeys in the Sahara, where, at least, you can get out and roam. Nope! Not for me.
Personally I don’t think it’s physically practical, because the ship is so long there is the very real possibility that during rough seas the boat would snap in half as it sails through the peaks and troughs of the waves
@Eragor the Kindhearted Even if they considered it, there's plenty of cases of things being built to spec that ultimately failed in real life because they failed to take into account something critical. On a scale like this, if something went wrong it could cause the single greatest loss of life at sea in history. I think it's honestly kind of arrogant for someone to think it would work flawlessly. The ocean is a dangerous place, not a place for something this fantastical.
Technical issues aside, this sounds like an awful way to live. Just being stuck on an enormous hunk of moving metal. I mean, ya got the water and can enjoy the port cities. But when you've been waiting a month to get out onto land and take that hike you've been wanting to, how enjoyable will it be to do so at the same time that half the population on the ship has the same idea? Living on this ship sounds like a weird 80's chrome nightmare.
Yeah, it's basically small city but you can't go anywhere without using plane, boat or helicopter. And even though it's big, it wouldn't take too much time to explore the place. Also I would imagine public areas would fill up quite fast due to how many people would be living there. There are ships that provide permanent apartments for rich people, but those work due to relatively low occupancy, as they cost quite a bit. And it's more like cottage kind of thing, I don't think people actually live on those permanently. If someone could actually make floating city that actually mimics city with proper houses, space and so on I could actually get behind that. This one is just essentially a big cruise ship that is marketed as city.
No, some people including me, thus actually seems awesome. I mean no taxes and you get to explore the world. But I definitely couldn’t live there 365 days a year, probably like alternate seasons.
@@margievanpetten777 No taxes, but instead the bill for ship facilities (taxes, but we don't name them taxes so its cool...) which are significantly more costly to maintain than in a normal land based city with roads leading to and from it. Paying no taxes is just a simple argument used to lure in the crows who are too gullible to realize that this stuff isn't free... Just picture it: you're stuck on there for weeks at a time, doing what? Having a job which requires you to take a plane every morning to around the world to where it is you work, start your day of work with a 13 hour flight, nice... So normal jobs are out, you'll spend 24/7 of your time on the ship, doing whatever job you can keep, just remember that the entire population is trying to get your job so good luck getting a nice salary... The idea of a 'permanent vacation cruise' sounds fun for the first second, after that you start thinking about it and realize how idiotic it is...
4 года назад+8
I am guessing you have never been on any of the world's largest cruise ships? I have and I can tell you that it is easy to forget you're at sea and think you are just in a mall, pool, or beachfront condo. A ship this size would be like living on an island like Saipan.
Gotta love those big dreamers. If it was up to me and my pessimism, nothing would've been made. I really love that guy's passion and optimism! I hope this is made!
@@Mikey-ym6ok Modern pirates with RPGs and machine guns get thwarted by water cannons on a cargo ship. They may have guns but they are usually incapable of even coming near a mid range cargo ship, let alone board it. And a good security force with a few machine guns can guarantee that.
It sounds like a good idea on paper, but maintenance would be hell, and one tsunami or hurricane is enough to knock the freedom ship out of action. Would be an absolute banger of a shipwreck though Edit: Holy hell guys, never got this many likes before. people are bringing up some good points in the replies Edit2: People are calling me virgin scum I’m the replies because of the first Edit. I mean... they’re not wrong
tsunamis on the open ocean have little effect, being at most a few cm's high and really rather long. hurricanes can (mostly) be avoided one would think, but i'd say the real threats are logistics, and rogue waves.
thisisn'tmyrealname Yeah, rogue waves would be a real threat, they might not sink the Freedom Ship, but they would definitely cause some serious damage and knock out a condos
@@Triplane1234It would take days for a ship of this size to sink, that's assuming no separate compartments are made and the hole is giant, no redundancies. That would be more than enough time to repair or at least rescue the people on board.
I think if this were to ever happen it would probably end up just sitting off a couple of miles from the shore of some Caribbean tax haven and not adventuring around the open ocean like we're imagining
It probably wouldn’t be able to. If this thing were to get caught in a storm in the middle of the ocean literally tens of thousands could die. The boat would just have too many weak points
@@fart63 - study it. Plenty of material out there to read up on. For modern Marine vessels that are properly constructed, the bigger you go, the sturdier *and* more stable you are. All the hysteria about ships breaking in half in storms involves old &/or ill-maintained ships. Again, go and read up about this stuff. Considering the billions it'll take to build, the Operators/Managers will have a *major* incentive to see that it stays in good condition.
@@ephennell4ever or they will do the opposite of that to save money since it already costs so much lmao. People seriously underestimate the power of water. Every ship is sinkable. Anyway, only counting threats in the water is foolish, this thing could be a terrorists dream. Isolated “country” in the middle of nowhere with thousands of extremely wealthy people on board? Will take hours for rescue to get to the boat in the middle of the ocean (if they’re even aware it’s happened). Every aspect you look at it from, this ship is a disaster trying to get funded.
The part about "no federal laws would apply" is wrong, as every ship in the world, by international law has to be registered somewhere, and while in international waters, said ships is bound to the laws of the country the ships is registered in.
$10 Billion is low, a single Gerald R. Ford class cost $13 Billion and that is for a relatively proven design when compared to Freedom Ship. If it did get built I would expect that it tours the world once then has 10 years where they barely move it to lower costs then becomes uninhabitable.
This feels like a horror premise ngl! Like can you imagine the potential abuse of power by a landlord that literally owns the only land around you? Where all the maintenance workers would live? The potential for abuse due to differences in international law? Not to mention the likely constant monotony of the interior, how easy it would be to get lost or just... Keep walking, never reaching the end, never seeing your unit. What about rooms in the centre with no windows? Like holy shit this would be so bad
Thank you. I've been scrolling for 20 minutes and most people up to this are point completely enchanted by the idea of living on a perpetual cruise. I immediately thought about crime, too. People get murdered on cruise ships and because it's over international waters, nobody is ever charged. Most cruise line companies are based out of places like Panama because their governments are so easy to evade/bribe. It would eventually spiral into low-key anarchy.
There would have to be a mini democratic nation complete with a constitution, laws, police, courts, jails. It could work so long as you ran it like a mini 1st world nation. Lol could you imagine how insane that could potentially be. It reminds me of Walt Disneys EPCOT city, Disney World. Once again a Florida thing 😂
I've always wanted this to exist because the idea is just so *out there* but I'm reasonably confident that the idea is a logistics nightmare with how many supplies would be required for the ship to function and the cost it would incur to keep up with consumption. It's not that I think it's impossible from a technical standpoint, but rather that once you factor in maintenance and logistics practicalities that it just becomes economically impossible. The ship would be virtually unable to dock anywhere, thus requiring tenders, the airport would be a liability and maintenance nightmare, and servicing the ship itself would be incredibly difficult since it could not be dry-docked anywhere. I would love to see it become reality, I just don't see how it could do so without being a massive capital sink.
This reminds me of something you'd dream up in some sort of school project for shop class and then you present it and the teacher and other students pick it apart and tell you why it wouldn't work
AsrielKekker it’s a model maybe it’s just the way i interpreted the comment to me a smaller version would be one that could show that a vessel like this is possible and would be sea worthy
Clint Maas the titanic was an accident waiting to happen before hitting water there were corners cut most of the workers weren’t being paid and it was rushed halfway through
Every accident makes things safer, even modern times the cruise ships with latest tech still have problems, like the cruise ship that had a fire in the engine room, then days of misery for the passengers and crew due to no backup generator at another part of the ship, however thanks to that incident, now all cruise ships must now have that backup generator outside of the engine room.
It's been way more than 10 years since this concept. I remember seeing this in the late 90s when I was in High School. I think there was a Popular Mechanics issue that featured it that the school library had on one of the tables I saw it in.
it looks like itd be electric. I don't see any pipes which could create smoke. If you look at the pictures, theres like huge, probably miles of just solar panels. Fueling that with normal fuel for like just an hour would probably destroy the ozon layer instantly lol. I'd be multiple factories producing at the same time.
The longer a ship gets, the greater the greater the wave forces acting on it leading to hogging and sagging. At that legnth, using "off the shelf" steel, she is more or less guranteed to break her back once she encounter any waves greater than those found in the average kiddie pool.
Actually, at that scale, the hogging and sagging would cancel each other out. That being said, one rogue wave and an entire section of the superstructure is going into the sea. At best, the water leaves the bits vital to the ship's structural integrity, but everything else (walls, carpeting, staircases, elevators, people) get shoved out the other side with the water.
Wonder if they ever did any tests on how the ship would perform in rough seas. Not just in terms of passenger comfort, but in terms of structural integrity. Several big ships have cracked and broken in two under extreme rough conditions.
@@staycgirlsitsgoingdown2 I think they'd just anchor offshore and use the tender boats to get in. That's what cruise ships do when they're too big for the port.
@@ACoolKidsProduction even so, what about supplies? Fuel? Water? How are they even gonna have enough boats? If 10,000 people want to go from ship to shore, you need 100 boats carrying 100 people going back and forth
I'm wondering the same thing. With the ship that long the hull is going to flex when it hit rough sea. I'm just not sure what to think about the structural integrity of the ship. Many bulk carriers were lost because the hull flexes in rough sea and cracks quickly formed around the ship and the hull snapped in half
I remember reading about this project like 10 years ago in a magazine. At that time I thought it was totally insane and now I think the same. There is no way how this thing could float. Well, it could, but it would not be possible to take it across the ocean. Like oil tankers - the long ones, they sometimes break in half during storms, so I can´t imagine this thing going through a 40m huge waves. Cool idea though.
Umm, no. First of all look at the planned route. It's mostly along the coast. There's no need for this thing to be crossing oceans week in, week out whether the weather is good or not, as with freight vessels. So if there's chance of storm, you just don't sail, or reroute. Secondly, the maritime engineers who design ships for a living know a bit more about the subject than you or me and as mentioned even in this video, they're saying it's doable. Dynamic rigidity of the hull etc is nowadays modeled on computers at the earliest staged of the design.
Oh, and "going through 40 m waves"? Buddy, check out the scale of the ship first. It's over a mile long. And several times larger than the largest ships now. It's gonna go through waves just fine. Also, comparing to an oil tanker isn't very sensible if you think about how very differently they are built and how oil tankers have to carry an immense mass, where as a passenger ship is mostly an empty, rigid steel wafer (=not a container filled with liquid). The ships that break in waves are unmaintained rusty tankers from the 1980's that are forced to sail into storms by their operators.
@@iLoveTheseRemoras because of how absolutely massive this thing is, it can’t get very close to the coast, because it would drag along the bottom or the sea. But in a hurricane or tsunami this thing is completely done for
@@fart63 It doesn't actually have any more draft than a regular cruise ship. That's what matters most. So it can go to existing ports just fine as long as the length of the pier is sufficient. It doesn't have to stay for example 10 km from shore 😁 Also, the bigger a vessel is, the better it takes storms. I have been in a couple.
@@iLoveTheseRemoras dude this thing is supposed to have open decks all throughout it, there are supposed to be people walking all over it at all times, not to mention the whole thing is made of glass.. reinforced or not, this thing cannot sail like a normal boat and because of how many lives are at stake if it gets in an accident there is no way they could just take it out into the middle of the ocean where it would take rescue efforts days to get to them
A brand new video on the sinking of the Andrea Doria - ruclips.net/video/3D7WK-kcGas/видео.html
when are you doing the vid of reality of current technology and logistics sinking the freedom ship?
Oh yes
Daddy
I love how the animation *does not contain a SINGLE lifeboat* ^^
Roger GOOCH
OAAo
bruh the “lifeboats” would be cruise ships
They would steal costa concordia lol
alex haes people that roast others who did nothing wrong.... nolifes
At the smallest, scaled up Titanics.
And their lifeboats need to have lifeboats
@@MilosCsrb lol
This has some “Entire city completely sunken into the sea.” Potential
and by an iceberg if it wanted to sail the north atlantic
s6uare _ Caused by a rich resident’s toilet clog
a real Atlantis.
s6uare _ Rapture. Bioshock
As our final act, while fire rains from the sky and the last of humanity burns to the ground, we must sink Freedom Ship into the sea such that those who come after might finally witness a true Atlantis.
I don’t think the airport on top would please a lot of people
It would sure ruin a relaxing afternoon by the pool to have planes constantly taking off and landing a few floors above you.
It would certainly entertain plane enthusiasts
I think a lot of people would probably find it interesting to watch planes landing so closely to them.
After all, American supercarriers are a thing. And despite having a gigantic steamcatacult LAUNCH aircraft off of them and have them land - rather violently (Naval aircraft have some of the most robust landing gear of any aircraft design for this reasons) - and at all hours of the night. Doesn't prevent them from sleeping.
EDIT: Read on. No, actually, it's not as loud as you think it is.
@@matchesburn military personnel aren't known for their picky sleeping habits.
@SteelRodent
I don't think you realize the difference in decibels that a military afterburner turbojet engine makes in comparison to a civilian aviation turbofan jet. I can guarantee you if you did you wouldn't think your argument was relevant - because military aircraft on carriers use afterburners on turbojet engines and are insanely loud, much more so than turbofan engines on jetliners (and worse yet for your argument the engines on airliners which are already much quieter turbofans have had sound dampening engineering incorporated into the mounting and engine - next time you fly on an airliner and if you see jagged engines on the outside rear of the engine - congratulations, you've just spotted sound dampening systems). Yet, again, somehow people below the deck on aircraft carriers aren't going deaf like they're inside a constantly ringing bell or something.
Imagine being born, raised, going to school on this thing, accepting this as completely normal, and then having “I need to leave this town” thoughts
It reminds me of a y2k-ish movie about a teenager in a world where some people live and grow up on space stations around Earth
Watch the movie, legend of 1900.
Just acquire WW2 tanks and have non-lethal fights with them
@@counterfit5weird thought but imagine the sort of crises that would happen with a ship like this. I mean this sounds ripe for a Hollywood plot, where a whole bunch of planes full of para-military group or terrorists or some ‘rogue nation’ fly onto the top airport and hold it hostage. I mean there’s way too much potential for mis-use here since its a floating island that you can lock off if you want. I mean its an aircraft carrier times 50
@@nthgth Zenon, Girl of the 21st Century? Was a Disney movie, loved that ish. Also, agreed.
the water this pushes away is enough to flood the netherlands
Perhaps
It's called water displacement
@@drowningin thanks, english is not my native language
A large-ish bottle of water is enough to flood the Netherlands
*yes i was getting quite thirsty*
They should just make a disaster movie of this and call it a day.
There already is one. It’s called the Poseidon Adventure
@@psychlops924 i know about that one. I'm talking even bigger scale :D
They’d still have to make at least SOME of the ship to shoot the film
I hate it but yes.
Well it’s mayb not a movie but it is very close to what we now have we have floating cities these cruise ships have everything what u need shops, restaurants, spa, baths, cinemas and a whole theater
Sounds like something I would have imagined when I was 9 and nothing had limits
Ko
Yeeeee i remember those days
This ship is some shit straight out of warhammer 40K
And i drew flying cruise ships🤣🤣
I knew better then that when I was 9 lol
can you imagine anything worse than living on a mile long cruise ship underneath an airport lol
I never thought of it that way LMAO
Good point
I wonder who would be stupid enough to buy an internal apartment with no natural light and more than 50 m from it (I assume this thing would be quite more than 100m wide). These days cruise ships are struggling to sell internal cabins for more than budget prices and the vast majority of the apartments on this monster would be internal.
Yeah... Dying comes to mind.
@@maxart3392 Jeff Bezos
This sounds like it has a “massive sea accident with record number of deaths” potential
Haven Price
It has titanic potential energy
Swampy the titanic didn’t have smaller cruise ships at its rear or an airfield on its roof
@@gavib4246 the titanic did, however, have tiny wooden boats that only accommodated 2/3rds of the ships population... the lifeboats on THIS thing would be literally small apartment blocks lol, food for days
the runway on top is about the dumbest use of space possible. these guys have no chance of making it happen.
This time it's really unsinkable
Oh they REALLY want to live like Zach & Cody
Damn bro that some meories
@@6Six6Six6Bruh Ah yes, the meories
The suite life
Dude, "Breaker High" predates that.
ruclips.net/video/2YjLAk7ZUBg/видео.html
Yes, "That" IS Ryan Gosling. When he was a kid,
he had to do stupid stuff like this and "Young Hercules".
I still find it hard to believe that he became a big movie star.
I guess he really is "that" good looking.
Is anyone else concerned as to how this ship is supposed to turn
Details, details
Her rate of turn would be very concerning , also her stopping distance... your standard ship(cargo, container etc) has a stopping distance of over a mile. Also how many thrusters would they even put on it. So many questions.
360-degree azipods
@@ayoutubechannelname perhaps... it may be feasible for azimuth propulsion. While the concept is rather interesting, a vessel of this size would surely put everything we know about ship construction and design to test... would love to see a model of it in a tow tank one day.
@@SOACV I would love to see BROAD Core Tubular Stainless Steel Slabs used in ship construction. It would make giant ships like Freedom Ship actually feasible.
Wouldn't just a normal storm be a huge problem for a ship like that?
I doubt there are swells big enough to even make this ship break a sweat. But such a big ship would struggle to stay away from them, so would probably be suffering constant damage - like those little docks on the back... they'd get absolutely swamped in a big storm.
@@JaidenJimenez86tbf although the ship is so big that it could withstand storms and waves and not bob up and down. So instead of being affected like a cruise liner in turbulence, floating with the waves, it’d be much worse. I mean for example houses that move with earthquakes can survive them better than rigid fixed tightly-constructed houses. This boat wouldn’t move with the waves but it would just start getting damaged by them a lot
@@JaidenJimenez86 Also, the sheer size of the ship would mean that any heavy swell would create constant bouyancy voids under the hull (gaps between waves where the hull isn't supported by the sea), and the sheer weight of having an office block *with an airport on top* would cause immeasurable stress to the hull. Unless the designers have invented some magical alloy that would be able to resist these stresses, the keel snapping in half at some point would be a matter of when, not if.
Imagine the amount of power needed to keep this thing on course if there is even a mildly strong side wind, its basically a mile long sail
generally larger ships tolerate bad weather better than smaller ships
You think your upstairs neighbor’s are bad, imagine what an upstairs airport would be like.
"I live in an apartment above a bowling alley.....which is located below another bowling alley." -Frank Grimes
@@SergeantExtreme Grimey could never catch a break.
The flight deck would not be that busy.
How do you think people on Aircraft Carriers feel?
Lol right
"send out the life rafts! "
"you mean ocean liners?!"
"yes"
jebes909090 the ship never happened because 2012 never happened. That’s the tea. ☕️ 🐸.....you didn’t hear it from me.....
@@nsr5961 lmao wat
Xelyius oh nothing. Hi
NS R stop
Why life rafts when there's air planes
Ignoring the physics involved with moving a "ship" of this magnitude through open waters and prevailing winds, the astronomical amount of logistical issues they would need to solve would rival sending someone to Mars.
The cost alone to maintain a ship this large would bankrupt a small nation. How do you even dry dock a 6,000ft ship to repaint the hull? The amount of barnacles that would grow on a mile long ship would be staggering, probably produce enough drag to stop this ship in its tracks.
Not only that, but feeding all these people. Where are you gonna put all that food? You'd have to almost certainly have a garden of sorts
Think about sinking this thing. Imagine the giant reef it could host, imagine the amount of marine wildlife that would thrive in it.
Greatest Ever they would need a slaughterhouse on board or something. Think of that. Or be a vegan ship
Totally agreed. This is just a massive mess on board.
They'd be better having a fleet of ships that you can ferry between.
When I look at the "Freedom Ship" project something straight forward occurs to me: Change the business plan. Design somewhere between 6 and 10 ships that join together to form the Freedom Ship. Start with 1 ship. Then use the revenue to build and join a 2nd ship to it. Then keep adding on. Beyond gaining revenue / income this would also provide redundancy for essential services (water purification, sewage treatment, electricity, propulsion and ethernet / wifi) It seems to me the redundancy would be necessary for this vessel to be viable for the # of people and to avoid a humanitarian crisis.
Seems like the most logical way to build it up slowly. But even then it seems like you'd have a tough time combining the structures and reinforcing them for the scale imagined.
A Transformers Combiner! Now when Godzilla starts to attack Tokyo, it'll become a super robot for battle! 😆
Look at the brain on Ron! It wouldn't get past that first ship, maybe two. Remember how exciting the moon landing was? Yeah, they had to start canceling those after a few years when the public grew tired of it.
Good thinking. Even then I doubt it would be very successful, but at least it's much more plausible than the original idea
I see, kind of a Freedom Voltron.
I went on a cruise ship, got lost a couple times
I don’t know how I would find my room even on the first day in that thing
just pick a room, any room! actually no that sounds disgusting just picking a room and then checking if its occupied and disrupting a person just trying to sleep.
They should create an app to help you find your room and find restaurants, stores, nearby emergency exits, lifeboats, safety jackets,etc. Or they could give you a map
The same way people find their way on carriers. You don't have to learn every inch of the ship, just the places you frequent.
You'd need GPS to get to the restaurant.
Bruh there would obviously be a map
This is just literally a non-militarized Star Destroyer
It is not an island
It's a ship
@@HUNKragor that's no island, it's a sea station...
So what I’m hearing is we could potentially build a sea star destroyer
That's exactly what I was thinking. Or that it's a Sea Death Star and the cruise ships are the Star Destroyers.
the USA will just turn it into a aircraft carrier to fight the rebel scum
*We can build it if given the money*
Yep, as an engineer, I can confirm. That sounds like exactly what an engineer would say.
Engineers: fuck your physics. This is completely possible to build. Now will it actually survive the ocean? Fuck no that thing is doomed to fail... but fuck yeah we can build it
Derplord 2.0 gotta pove engineers
@@AuGrrr : Nah, it would survive the ocean, that's not a problem. The _financing rounds_ are what it'll never survive, and that's just because it's too big of a step to start off with.
@@absalomdraconis well it would be super fucking hard to make it survive since there are rogue waves that can cause shit to happen and a tsunami can fuck it up badly.
@@AuGrrr Rogue waves shouldn't be too much of a problem, there's ships that were built a century ago that survived some pretty massive rogue waves.
When you realize that the ship is an oversized aircraft carrier.
Your not wrong
I was thinking the same. Would be a good use for a demilitarized and retrofitted nuclear aircraft carrier. Advanced water world.
An oversized scam. But you see, the bigger the scam, the more morons you can sign up to finance
your dreams of the billionaire's life in retirement.
@@jerrydiver1 Can't argue your logic.
@@jamesritacco1693 his logic is better than the people that are “building” the ship
Titanic: takes 2 hours and 40 minutes to sink
Freedom ship: 1 week 4 hours
and somehow 19k ppl still die. lol.
Imagine trying to get a lifeboat out. Oh the humanity
@@xenonsha3324 lol
It would probably hit the sea floor before it sunk fully lol
@@agaXM at least you didn't edit your comment for that
*gets close to funding in 2008*
*massive financial apocalypse hits*
*gets close to funding in 2019*
*massive global pandemic hits*
Dude can’t catch a break
Maybe for a reason...
Robert Takacs ??
@@King_Zog_I because it would sink
@@roberttakacs2312 not necessarily. A vessel this large would have so many compartments that you would need hundreds of millions of liters of water to sink it. You would have days to respond to a rupture in the hull. I know "no ship is too large to sink", but this very well could be it at this scale.
@@yagorbalotsin Do NOT say it's unsinkable NOT EVEN SOMETHING SIMILAR... DONT THINK ABOUT IT!!!!!
Imagine how expensive EVERYTHING would be. Food, toilet paper, medicine, freshwater. Everything even on an island is more expensive with regular supply routes being flown or shipped in. A gallon of milk in the Bahamas is $11.19. Now imagine supplying a moving ship that can never dock at most ports and whos timeline can be altered by the weather. Even before covid-19 there are horror stores of different bacteria and viruses infecting large numbers of passengers and crew. Plus it is a city. There would be crime. You would need police, judges, courts and jails. Also, where are all the service workers going to live? They can't afford a condo. Would they be supplied dorms and have a portion of their salary go towards "rent" that they pay to the company ship? What if the workers all went on strike because of pay or living conditions? This would never work.
agreed It should’ve been a cruise ship instead of a ship where people can live on
Agreed they should rather build the super pyramid in japan
@@Prokerboss tbh the super pyramid at least sounds plausible considering its Japan that wants to do it. They already have tons of futuristic architecture and engineering in their track record
@@MashZ yep and they’re gonna make it in other countries too
I think the whole project is too ambitious, costly and could potentially result in the world's biggest lawsuit if the vessel sinks and kills thousands of people onboard.
Because Freedom Ship is intended to be a sustainable moving city across the world's oceans, there's far too many problematic circumstances it could face in the future.
It takes *alot* of planning and management to run a city (especially the finance's to run the place), and if even one system begins to fail it wouldn't take much for the rest to follow.
I personally feel like it's a big gamble for investors to put money into something this risky, but I do think it's a cool concept and I admire the creators passion for his design.
I think Freedom Ship could become a good sci-fi movie one day, I'd definitely watch it. 👍
I think SimCity has a word for this.
Arcology?
And from a later game: Columbia, the independent floating city...
An Arcology (Architecture + Ecology) usualy describes more of a self sufficient city in a building, so not just living space but farms & factories as well. Still, would be an interesting upscaled version of this ship :D
This ship could get hit by an iceberg and the people in the back wouldn't realize for two weeks lol
Unrelated but I have been staring at your profile pic, horrified, for the last minute. Teeth
@@helenajeyne damn
Just wanna say your pfp made me tuck my feet into the blanket
your profile is horrifying
Nice pfp
One missed food shipment and you will see what people are really capable of.
They would most likely have food for weeks in storage.
@Robertson Thirdly Yeah we don't need freedom ship, we have the virus.
@@HilleCine imagine if the toilet paper ran out...
@aids and you'll infect everyone
Oo ya biting porn
“Start funding in 2020” Well this particular comment didn’t age well...
Any day now!
Maybe he could just tie together the abandoned cruise ships and make one mega ship that way. Lord knows the cruise industry won't be coming back for decades.
Every time it gets to a good point we go in another crisis
@@pavelow235 I'm curious why you think it would take decades. Cruising will return to a somewhat normal level by the end of 2021. Though, less profitable because there will be less demand. It might take a few years for the industry to fully recover to pre-pandemic times, but it certainly won't take decades.
I think it’d be interesting to see it happen, but recent events have made more reluctant doubts of the project from me. This is so sad :(
As the History Guy always says, "Every great story involves pirates." I'll bet this already does.
Uhh, yeah chief. I’m gonna pass on an airport roof. I live by an airport, and just the planes flying over everyday is annoying. Having private jets landing on your roof each day? Hell no
I thought this was a joke because I read your name as a wild FLYING cabinet
The plans do state turboprops instead of jets wich will lower noise
@@Widoghastly not by much. The world's loudest thing is when one of the old WWII bombers fly over my house, and those are all turboprop. Whenever it's the airshow and they bring one in, everybody in the neighborhood knows
Antonio Rioseco turboprops are actually around 10 to 30 decibels louder than jet engines, but make a lower frequency of noise. and in all honesty i would imagine that if it’s a floating city it will most likely have more civilian type aircraft which will make much less noise, and most people would use the ferry’s to travel back and forth between the ship and land due to most tourists wanting to pay for a cheaper price to get on board.
I rather enjoy the sound of jets overhead.
"Your condo view is always changing"
... look! a wave.
Oh and uhh, land... land! Finally, I’ve been stuck on this godforsaken thing with airplanes landing over me for years...
Oh look an iceberg....
Oh shite
This sounds like the “Fyre Fest” of cruise ships!
Very accurate. Though I imagine the tickets wouldn't be anywhere near as cheap.
Perfect analogy!
Aaron Seiz Oh no!
i get the joke, but its not accurate at all.
note that:
-they refused to take money from sketchy people/groups.
-they didnt start collecting money based on unfounded claims.
-they have actively redesigned the ship based on industry input.
-they didnt already sell units to people who will never get them.
all of those make it very very different from fyre fest.
I love seeing rich people swindled out of money.
This is like those old retro future city designs from the 20’s-30’s (like the movie “Metropolis”): They seem cool and nifty at first, until you start thinking about actually living there and then realizing it would probably be a miserable experience (i.e. lack of proper green/earth/nature space, too compact, kinda ugly, really desolate, etc,.).
Whoever designed this must not know what a rogue wave is.
@Logan Snyder Rogue waves are nothing for a ship this big. But besides, they never cruise in bad weather anyway.
@@DunnickFayuro I guess that you know what a rogue wave does. The larger the ship basically the worst of an impact it has. 50m waves form randomly due to constructive interference. One place that it most often occurs is in the see just off the South African coastline.
These waves have been the reasons for many a ship damage or being snapped in half.
The wave comes along and the ship can with standard it but the problem is as the wave travels along and part of the ship sticks out over the wave causing forces on the ship that it's not designed for causing it to snap in half
Exactly what I was thinking. Building it isn't as much of a problem as building it the second time.
@Super Noodles I didn't understand 1/3 of what you wrote. Maybe re-read yourself before posting?
@@DunnickFayuro sorry English isn't my first language :')
I'd like to generally consider myself a pretty chill person who doesn't worry a lot, and I think that it's a great idea, but holy shit I could bring up a million nightmarish scenarios with awful outcomes
A ship the size of a city, under the jurisdiction of no government.
We all know what kind of people that is going to attract
sounds like you should be a movie script writer then :D.
@@jamesricker3997 rich people?
Lol same. Especially since this was recommended to me right after watching a ship disaster marathon 🤦😂
@@jamesricker3997 This is basically Bioshock (rapture)
Not a city. It’s a future artificial reef.
A giant one
An accidental one
The fish city.
Nah it would've been a huge ship, basically too big to sink, ie unsinkable.
@@BoleDaPole it would be like the Ever Given, but vertically stuck on the seafloor
Instead of a single unit, I think it'd be safer and more practical to create units, the way trains are built. The units could easily be disconnected for maintenance and repair. Automated bridges would allow passengers and residents to cross from one section to another. I don't know how engineers would balance everything, but we've seen too many superliners go down after being hailed as super safe or "unsinkable.: Gotta learn from past mistakes.
Hope the ship includes a stop in Pyongyang. We have the floating hotel that was once at the Great Barrier Reef
Wtf
@@officialjonas9163 Don't mess with him.
Kim Jong un greatest leader EVER
Kim Jung has a small dong! 🤣🤪👌
@@Slevin-Kelevra epic
“Mid 2010s”
Can’t believe that’s a thing now.
Ew ew ew
Just wait until we get into the mid 2020s Omg 😷
We’re about to enter the roaring 20s again
Coaster that was a very happy time in the world I hope it happens again
@@melainebullock ww1, Spanish flu, great depression. I guess they did make extreme advancements in technology though.
This sounds like a 25 year long, billion dollar kickstarter scam.
You mean Star citizen?
@@jlin1519 bro. Savage roast. Also, they still exist?
@@jlin1519 How's that "Q4 of 2020" release date looking? Did they push that back too?
Except it's not
@@jlin1519 star citizen is shit because it's a fucking video game that somehow hasn't released yet after eight years and 300 million dollars. Freedom Ship is a fucking cruise liner apartment complex that is too big to complete.
I remember both the show and the articles in the magazines back in the day. It was one of those mega projects that have been floating around as either planned projects or ideas for a future endeavor. One idea back then that comes to mind, and obviously not built, is the Tokyo Skytree. Hanging skyscrapers like Christmas ornaments off a pyramid shaped super structure over a good portion of Tokyo bay.
Skytree was actually built
Everybody else: picking at the health, saftey and engineering problems.
me: giggling cuz the guy in charge is named "gooch"
I watched this with my friend and found that quite funny as well
My inner 11 year old giggling right along with you.
Seen homeboys name and was like hehe gooch
Gooch always reminds me of the gooch from “Different Strokes” that always beat up Arnold and wrapped the baseball bat around his neck
He said gooch
Uh huh huh huh huh
Florida Man came up with the idea of the Freedom Ship, not surprised. I watched the Discovery documentary. I doubt it'll actually be built considering the situation in Hong Kong at the moment but I admire his confidence. You worked on this for months and I must say, it paid off.
While feasible in a technical sense, it's probably just not something that would work financially. Governing a normal city can be hard enough, but one on a ship? I imagine that things would turn tits-up given time, and that's only if the project floated itself financially to begin with. The fallout from it going bankrupt would probably be fairly nasty.
Not being registered in a home port would also bring a big set of problems regarding sovereignty. IE, what would they do if the ship was boarded by pirates? With most ships, you can call on your home country for help. But you'd be your own sovereign nation with an unregistered ship. You'd have to have your own police and paramilitary force, and I imagine many nations wouldn't let you into their waters if that were the case.
Would your captain be elected? Or would it be a corporate autocracy/oligarchy? There's a lot beyond just the building of it, of anything, building a floating city is easy. But managing it would be quite the ordeal. I think we're more likely to get no-mobile floating cities first, via seasteading. And see how the world treats such man-made places and their sovereignty or lack thereof.
I saw a Florida man a few weeks ago at Costco in his cart he had his dogs in the cart and they had confederate flags on them that’s why I’m never going back to Pensacola
you poor thing.
@@noahcricket Florida: America's butt of all jokes and weirdest people.
Gawesomesauce I’m living in the United county’s of crack heads
Looks like Cover art for a Vaporwave Album.
HAHAHA
New from _.///N0Disc™_ , P0ΨD0N_ADVNTR1
So much, I want this album. Could be the follow up to Eccojams
Tyde - A Synthwave mix
Vaporware ocean liners
*TRUE VAPORWAVES*
Fun fact I actually reached out to them by email and they project is still being worked on! Not gonna lie the concept really intrigued me too.
Aircraft fails landing, smashes into the "hull" of the ship, a giant fire erupts, can't get it under control, basically a small city just sunk. Life boats anyone?
Sweet..Jesus..
It's like the Titanic and 9/11 had a baby
Life boats..?don't you mean life ocean liners..?lmao
Omg that loss will be phenomenal
@@psyffee3755 lmaoooooooo 😆
The size was just dumb. Even the major cruise lines didn't start with their mega ships (1/20th the size of this). They built their way up. Starting with something the size of a large cruise ship modified to support permanent residents would have been a lot more viable.
Agreed...one would need smaller examples just as proof of concept to then secure funding for something even approaching the scale of the freedom ship. That's ultimately what "sank" the project ...no one is going to risk that kind of money on a pipedream that may not even be possible or even economically sensible.
I'm mean that already been done, there is a motived curse ship that dose this right now.
It needed to be this big to make the money work. Making the basics is expensive, adding more layers is cheap.
If this idea happened in the 70’s they could have gotten funding to buy an old ocean liner like the Michelangelo, United States, Queen Elizabeth, or France to try it out with.
Yeah maybe go 150% the size of the biggest ship for a start and that's already pretty ambitious but at least you would get an understanding of the challenges you would have to face
It sounds like a really elaborate scheme to avoid taxes that mostly wouldn't work.
If your payment don’t go through for a few months are they going to kick you off the ship 🚢
This will work no doubt
There are people that "live" in ships to avoid paying taxes. They register a cruise ship to a tax haven, then register the cruise ship as their home after buying a cabin, so they never stay longer in a country than like 3 months a year and the ship is always moving, that way they avoid paying most taxes. But it's not 100% tax free, not to mention other costs.
but enough about brexit, look at this big ship!, lol
@@charlzincharge2281 this won’t go bad, it totally won’t!
"we will get funding by 2020"
If only he knew covid was coming.
I would name it Atlantis, “The City That Never Sinks”...
Not even you would buy this for a dollar
Everything sinks even the unsinkable titanic and citys with flood
I got a bad feeling about this
😂😂🤣🤣🤣
I think never you should call something "unsinkable" ..
It's not a good omen ..
They should add a cruise ship, at the back.
How else would they ferry guests?
Nah, the cruise ships would be the lifeboats, that also need lifeboats.
And where is this literally a cities, sewage and waste going daily? Straight into the ocean?
Good god..ewwh!
FINALLY SOMEONE SAYS IT
Also, how tf do they plan to bring in an entire city's worth of supplies every day from random places around the world? The daily supply chains alone would be a near-insurmountable logistical nightmare
They can have water treatment as well. It would fit
Zachary Leib-Perry hmm,*good point* there dude.
johnny doenuts good thing the oceans ficking massive then aye mate
The idea of the Freedom is interesting, however all I can think of is what would happen if it sunk. Literally it would be the biggest ship sinking/deaths at sea in history.
The deep sea creatures would praise God for all of the corpses raining down to feast on. (Marine snow basically.)
Imagine how dangerous this would have been during a pandemic.
Vee and it’s would be predominantly older people. They’d lose like 20,000 on just the one ship. I wouldn’t even want to go on this thing pandemics aside.
@@electi0neering rofl
The pandemic stopped the ship again 😂
Corons would have spread like wild fire
Ironically I was thinking the exact opposite - how easy it would have been for them to completely seal themselves off from the outside world
I'm not paying $1 million for a condo with airplanes landing on the roof.
Mary W i would imagine that a noise suppression system would be put into place to deal with the sound, and possibly a hanger deck for plane storage which gives some distance between you and the runway
I was thinking fine. It has aircraft landing on it . . . Okay no big deal. We have aircraft carriers. I'm just wondering what their plan is when one of these aircraft comes in short or crashes into the side of it at landing speed. It would basicly become the WTC of the ocean floor.
doesnt really matter how much noise suppression there is, go outside the ship and it would be like walking around an airport
Mary W Mostly coz we dont have a million 😂
@@omnicognatee true. with all that plan for more walking space, pretty sure not a lot of people would use it.
The guy who thought of this definitely came from Florida.
Yep! Reminds me of Walt Disneys "Disney World" EPCOT city project. What is it with rich dudes from Florida wanting to create mini autocratic dictatorships for themselves lol?!?
Yeah no doubt
@Luz Astral 999 facts
well they couldnt cut off florida and ride it through the seas so they decided to do the next best thing
I thought the same thing. lol
This is a sick setting for a dystopian movie.
Here is how it would ACTUALLY work: every rich guy would buy a $250k studio, declare it as his legal residence, and pay no taxes forever. While actually living somewhere else, of course, It would be a ghost ship with barely more than the crew on board.
you are so smart
B Randell
On The World, you are allowed to lease your unit to others with approval, though it wouldn’t be an ‘investment’ with all the fees.
The Freedom is supposed to have thousands of tourists; apparently.
So in theory it would always be busy. Though all those people trapped on a ship these days just screams ‘pandemic’ nightmare
Uhm, you try (as an American citizen) to declare your residence to be 'X', and then spend most of your time elsewhere ... good way to end up in prison! The IRS requires you to show/demonstrate that you spent at least 183 days out of the year at your primary residence, whether in the U.S. or elsewhere. I know about this because I had a conversation with a friend who was an accountant and handled some folk's tax-filings.
yeah. it would basically be floating 2021 Manhattan. YIKES.
@@ephennell4ever thats only for folks with a million bucks. Turn that Mil into a BIL, and our IRS tends to look the other way.
*Looks at that open front
So it's only for shallow water right?
*Looks at that 4:09 route across the north atlantic
Oh boy
Maintenance Renegade Lmfao they’d deserve it
Doctor Medkit What does your screen name mean?? Do u sell Med kits?? I’m a nurse and married to a doctor. Would make a nice gift.
@@guardiansanimalrescuestate7289 No no please do not buy drugs off of people in a youtube comments section lol
Doctor Medkit
Excuse me??? What med kit r u talking about. I meant what’s in a basic bag like stethoscope, etc.... not medicine. Obviously I don’t need to give a doctor medicine. He has his own meds he carries in his bag when he’s doing house calls. I also wasn’t sure if u had like first aide kits or what they were. I’m not an idiot.
You likely wouldn’t be able to get that thing within 10 nautical miles of the shoreline just due to her draft alone. And good luck finding a port large enough to accommodate her. And don’t even get me started on dry docks for repairs.
Also it low-key looks hideous imo. Cool concept tho.
Exactly. Yeah the smaller ships could ferry people, but not fuel/other things you get at dock. Also cause ships can empty human waste directly into water imagine the environmental impact of that alone
Sorry I’m dumb what does “ draft” mean
ShalevDa Boss how much of the ship is underwater
How would they launch it?
*REALIST ALERT! GET THEM HIGH ON SOMETHING SO THEYLL BELIEVE US*
I read that the condo ship “The World” was having problems. The novelty tended to wear off rather quickly and, in order to keep cash coming in, units were being rented out to short term occupants, dulling the cachet.
So like a regular cruise ship?
How much oil would this thing use on just one voyage? Seems like an environmental mess if something bad would ever happen.
It would need to use nuclear reactors with solar panels or it would need huge engines with an efficient milage and a automatic air purifier to stop toxins and carbon dioxide and recycle them
@@AuGrrr
Lets be honest, its a floating city of course its gonna use nuclear power i mean aircraft carriers today use nuclear power
@@casmsfrought9956 yeah it is a given.
@@AuGrrr filtering carbon out of the air is just heating the the atmosphere more.
At the moment its highly inefficient and needs stupid amounts of energy and methane .
@@SuperUltimateLP yeah which makes it not useful
Well, coronavirus has probably killed this one off for good...
thoughtn the same thing
If they got lucky they could shut off transport before some moron gets back from his Hong Kong vacation
Tris Blackshaw you know what else, sneezing. It used to be satisfying to sneeze. Now it feels like you've done something wrong.
•TheKaisTzar • bruh take your conspiracy theory’s somewhere else, this is a video about boats
I still have hope
It's like the ship from Wall-E except its on water
I took my first sea voyage at age 10, in 48 from Karachi to Basra. I saw flying fish falling at the deck, Birds diving to catch fish. It was hot as Haiti. There was no Air Conditioning, so we suffered. Since then, I have sailed many a times around the world except Australia, New Zealand and South America. Longer or shorter, the feeling of claustrophobia is always there. I have also taken journeys in the Sahara, where, at least, you can get out and roam. Nope! Not for me.
Would you be so kind, as to list all the places you traveled to? Just to be sure, we all get the full picture.
This sounds like some kinda zombie apocalypse escape ship
Or a death trap if 1 person gets infected
Darth Drake facts
Sounds like some weird libertarian project.
Or a proto-floating city like from _Black Ops 2_ .
Like 2012
Personally I don’t think it’s physically practical, because the ship is so long there is the very real possibility that during rough seas the boat would snap in half as it sails through the peaks and troughs of the waves
Thomas Chambers my thoughts exactly.
it woz a series of linked barges sksk
My concern is any wave that goes over the 'base' of the ship. With something that large, someone is bound to leave a door open.
I mean the thing probably had ballast tanks, gyros, counterweights, and the shear weight would/should keep it steady
@Eragor the Kindhearted Even if they considered it, there's plenty of cases of things being built to spec that ultimately failed in real life because they failed to take into account something critical. On a scale like this, if something went wrong it could cause the single greatest loss of life at sea in history. I think it's honestly kind of arrogant for someone to think it would work flawlessly. The ocean is a dangerous place, not a place for something this fantastical.
Technical issues aside, this sounds like an awful way to live. Just being stuck on an enormous hunk of moving metal. I mean, ya got the water and can enjoy the port cities. But when you've been waiting a month to get out onto land and take that hike you've been wanting to, how enjoyable will it be to do so at the same time that half the population on the ship has the same idea? Living on this ship sounds like a weird 80's chrome nightmare.
Yeah, it's basically small city but you can't go anywhere without using plane, boat or helicopter. And even though it's big, it wouldn't take too much time to explore the place. Also I would imagine public areas would fill up quite fast due to how many people would be living there.
There are ships that provide permanent apartments for rich people, but those work due to relatively low occupancy, as they cost quite a bit. And it's more like cottage kind of thing, I don't think people actually live on those permanently.
If someone could actually make floating city that actually mimics city with proper houses, space and so on I could actually get behind that. This one is just essentially a big cruise ship that is marketed as city.
Yeah after living/ working on a cruise ship for a year this sounds like a nightmare lol
No, some people including me, thus actually seems awesome. I mean no taxes and you get to explore the world. But I definitely couldn’t live there 365 days a year, probably like alternate seasons.
@@margievanpetten777 No taxes, but instead the bill for ship facilities (taxes, but we don't name them taxes so its cool...) which are significantly more costly to maintain than in a normal land based city with roads leading to and from it. Paying no taxes is just a simple argument used to lure in the crows who are too gullible to realize that this stuff isn't free...
Just picture it: you're stuck on there for weeks at a time, doing what? Having a job which requires you to take a plane every morning to around the world to where it is you work, start your day of work with a 13 hour flight, nice...
So normal jobs are out, you'll spend 24/7 of your time on the ship, doing whatever job you can keep, just remember that the entire population is trying to get your job so good luck getting a nice salary...
The idea of a 'permanent vacation cruise' sounds fun for the first second, after that you start thinking about it and realize how idiotic it is...
I am guessing you have never been on any of the world's largest cruise ships? I have and I can tell you that it is easy to forget you're at sea and think you are just in a mall, pool, or beachfront condo. A ship this size would be like living on an island like Saipan.
Gotta love those big dreamers. If it was up to me and my pessimism, nothing would've been made. I really love that guy's passion and optimism! I hope this is made!
Everybody gangsta until a hurricane strolls along
Pan fucking Tera!
Spoiler Alert dewsh
@@Sorelizard Getcha Pull🤟
Hurricane goes brtttttt
Word
Pirates would have been just like it's free real estate
They would have a security force abord
@@firstcyberbattalion7531 logic
@@firstcyberbattalion7531 really? You do know pirates aren't a bunch of guys with swords and peg legs....
@@Mikey-ym6ok And security guards wouldn't be holding stun guns around when there's no gun laws on a 10 billion dollar ship.
@@Mikey-ym6ok Modern pirates with RPGs and machine guns get thwarted by water cannons on a cargo ship. They may have guns but they are usually incapable of even coming near a mid range cargo ship, let alone board it. And a good security force with a few machine guns can guarantee that.
It sounds like a good idea on paper, but maintenance would be hell, and one tsunami or hurricane is enough to knock the freedom ship out of action. Would be an absolute banger of a shipwreck though
Edit: Holy hell guys, never got this many likes before. people are bringing up some good points in the replies
Edit2: People are calling me virgin scum I’m the replies because of the first Edit. I mean... they’re not wrong
tsunamis on the open ocean have little effect, being at most a few cm's high and really rather long. hurricanes can (mostly) be avoided one would think, but i'd say the real threats are logistics, and rogue waves.
thisisn'tmyrealname Yeah, rogue waves would be a real threat, they might not sink the Freedom Ship, but they would definitely cause some serious damage and knock out a condos
@@hosmerhomeboy what about if the ship is coming into Dock or in dock
Easy target for U-boats isn't it Willy?
taufiqutomo Oh yes my friend, oh yes
I love how the animation *does not contain a SINGLE lifeboat* ^^
BSF 2019: is the freedom ship possible?
BSF 2049: ABANDONED- Freedom Ship
More like CANCELLED- freedom ship
@Fachii2011 I want to see it
@Fachii2011 or a ghetto
A really dumb idea... 😎
@@Cre8Lounge lol reminds me of an old dystopias movie where the Empire State Building is a housing project.
It’s funny because I became obsessed by the concept of this ship at 10 years old also 😂, I’m now an engineer on cargo vessels
That’s so cool!!
that is how you win at life :)
Nice you got Bright Sun Films to reply to you!
hope you don't ever even try thinking of designing something like this.
If the owner says "Even God can't sink this ship city"
Iceberg: Aightt! Guys Back to work...
Julius Basas more like “curvature of the earth and basic naval architecture/physics”
Yeah..... Im sure that can be ssnk by an iceberg... Yea definetley not
Sank* lel
You mean Antarctica has to get back to work?
@@Triplane1234It would take days for a ship of this size to sink, that's assuming no separate compartments are made and the hole is giant, no redundancies. That would be more than enough time to repair or at least rescue the people on board.
I think if this were to ever happen it would probably end up just sitting off a couple of miles from the shore of some Caribbean tax haven and not adventuring around the open ocean like we're imagining
It probably wouldn’t be able to. If this thing were to get caught in a storm in the middle of the ocean literally tens of thousands could die. The boat would just have too many weak points
@@fart63 - study it. Plenty of material out there to read up on. For modern Marine vessels that are properly constructed, the bigger you go, the sturdier *and* more stable you are.
All the hysteria about ships breaking in half in storms involves old &/or ill-maintained ships. Again, go and read up about this stuff.
Considering the billions it'll take to build, the Operators/Managers will have a *major* incentive to see that it stays in good condition.
@@ephennell4ever or they will do the opposite of that to save money since it already costs so much lmao. People seriously underestimate the power of water. Every ship is sinkable. Anyway, only counting threats in the water is foolish, this thing could be a terrorists dream. Isolated “country” in the middle of nowhere with thousands of extremely wealthy people on board? Will take hours for rescue to get to the boat in the middle of the ocean (if they’re even aware it’s happened). Every aspect you look at it from, this ship is a disaster trying to get funded.
The part about "no federal laws would apply" is wrong, as every ship in the world, by international law has to be registered somewhere, and while in international waters, said ships is bound to the laws of the country the ships is registered in.
John.S Register the ship in sealand or some other micro nation 😂
as a sailor, you are right but he's talking about housing taxes or renter's tax which wouldn't apply to IMO or USA regulations
Fun fact: As of February 2020 Jeff Bezos could afford 12 Freedom Ships and still be a multi-billionaire.
Billy Bloomer I feel like if I had the money to brush off the cost of something like this, I’d fund it just to see what’s up
Now at the end of April
He can buy 14 freedomships.
$10 Billion is low, a single Gerald R. Ford class cost $13 Billion and that is for a relatively proven design when compared to Freedom Ship. If it did get built I would expect that it tours the world once then has 10 years where they barely move it to lower costs then becomes uninhabitable.
Hopefully Freedom Ship can come to life one day! That would be so cool! 🛳
Rachel McLean that was the price in the 90s/ early 2000s it would cost a lot more now
This feels like a horror premise ngl! Like can you imagine the potential abuse of power by a landlord that literally owns the only land around you? Where all the maintenance workers would live? The potential for abuse due to differences in international law?
Not to mention the likely constant monotony of the interior, how easy it would be to get lost or just... Keep walking, never reaching the end, never seeing your unit.
What about rooms in the centre with no windows?
Like holy shit this would be so bad
Thank you. I've been scrolling for 20 minutes and most people up to this are point completely enchanted by the idea of living on a perpetual cruise.
I immediately thought about crime, too. People get murdered on cruise ships and because it's over international waters, nobody is ever charged. Most cruise line companies are based out of places like Panama because their governments are so easy to evade/bribe. It would eventually spiral into low-key anarchy.
@@dacksonflux what are you talking about? literally everyone is shitting on it. i can’t see a single comment “enchanted” by it.
Getting some serious snowpiercer vibes
there would be none, stop lying
There would have to be a mini democratic nation complete with a constitution, laws, police, courts, jails. It could work so long as you ran it like a mini 1st world nation. Lol could you imagine how insane that could potentially be. It reminds me of Walt Disneys EPCOT city, Disney World. Once again a Florida thing 😂
I've always wanted this to exist because the idea is just so *out there* but I'm reasonably confident that the idea is a logistics nightmare with how many supplies would be required for the ship to function and the cost it would incur to keep up with consumption. It's not that I think it's impossible from a technical standpoint, but rather that once you factor in maintenance and logistics practicalities that it just becomes economically impossible. The ship would be virtually unable to dock anywhere, thus requiring tenders, the airport would be a liability and maintenance nightmare, and servicing the ship itself would be incredibly difficult since it could not be dry-docked anywhere. I would love to see it become reality, I just don't see how it could do so without being a massive capital sink.
Fast talking Florida guy with a pencil mustache, not so sure
Florida Man builds floating city
This has the potential to become Atlantis 2: electric boogaloo.
LMAO
Yea... it does... XD
r/unexpectedgrian
@@personme2483 what? Electric bogaloo is something everyone uses
@@personme2483 I've watched grian on hermit craft and he didn't create the electric boogaloo phrase
You know they referred to Titanic as a “floating city” and we see how that worked out
Lol 😂
So that means this is a country?
@@axiorsomethin130 Clearly, yes. And a very ugly one in my opinion...
And in early 1900's the metal was extremely brittle, not.like alloys today
@@minnaf757 i like the look of it
This reminds me of something you'd dream up in some sort of school project for shop class and then you present it and the teacher and other students pick it apart and tell you why it wouldn't work
The moment I heard "Florida" I was done.
🤣😆👍😊
Ahmed Proyash same tbh
As a Florida Man, I agree.
Know what just start trying to cut off Florida’s panhandle and attach some ship stuff to it.
Lmao
They should've built a smaller version and saw how that would've worked
They probably did and went "well fuck... so like NOTHING will work?"...
There’s a conventional cruise ship in existence that is just like this, minus the airport and stupid size.
8:26
Justin Shurie what did that time stamp have to do with the comment?
AsrielKekker it’s a model maybe it’s just the way i interpreted the comment to me a smaller version would be one that could show that a vessel like this is possible and would be sea worthy
The Titanic was a horrific accident. Freedom Ship: Hold my beer.
Clint Maas the titanic was an accident waiting to happen before hitting water there were corners cut most of the workers weren’t being paid and it was rushed halfway through
@American Patriot wow really
Every accident makes things safer, even modern times the cruise ships with latest tech still have problems, like the cruise ship that had a fire in the engine room, then days of misery for the passengers and crew due to no backup generator at another part of the ship, however thanks to that incident, now all cruise ships must now have that backup generator outside of the engine room.
😂😂
@@americanpatriot3667 Why does literally every cruise ship story start with a sketchy back story? Titanic, Costa Concordia 😂
It's been way more than 10 years since this concept. I remember seeing this in the late 90s when I was in High School. I think there was a Popular Mechanics issue that featured it that the school library had on one of the tables I saw it in.
The fuel that it would take just to move that would be such a waste.
Like Aircraft Carriers it would need a Nuclear Reactor
it looks like itd be electric. I don't see any pipes which could create smoke. If you look at the pictures, theres like huge, probably miles of just solar panels. Fueling that with normal fuel for like just an hour would probably destroy the ozon layer instantly lol. I'd be multiple factories producing at the same time.
Sp3cial1st “destroy the ozone layer instantly” hahaha bull crap
Ye Olde Spaniard dude shut up
Peeper Leviathan hmm, nah. Something that size would be nuclear powered. The “fuel” in this case would not be a waste
The longer a ship gets, the greater the greater the wave forces acting on it leading to hogging and sagging. At that legnth, using "off the shelf" steel, she is more or less guranteed to break her back once she encounter any waves greater than those found in the average kiddie pool.
I was thinking about prevailing winds acting on this "long, shallow" sail. Hurricane force winds would bend it into a pretzel.
Imagine building that thing, testing it and watch it titanic infront of you
most cruise ship nowadays are bigger than the Titanic. With the Freedom's mass, Its gonna take a huuuuuuggggeee ass wave to atleast rock it
Actually, at that scale, the hogging and sagging would cancel each other out. That being said, one rogue wave and an entire section of the superstructure is going into the sea. At best, the water leaves the bits vital to the ship's structural integrity, but everything else (walls, carpeting, staircases, elevators, people) get shoved out the other side with the water.
Wonder if they ever did any tests on how the ship would perform in rough seas. Not just in terms of passenger comfort, but in terms of structural integrity. Several big ships have cracked and broken in two under extreme rough conditions.
Forget that, where on EARTH are they planning to dock this? A mile long ship will not fit in ANY dock
@@staycgirlsitsgoingdown2 so they build one
What are rogue waves, alex
@@staycgirlsitsgoingdown2 I think they'd just anchor offshore and use the tender boats to get in. That's what cruise ships do when they're too big for the port.
@@ACoolKidsProduction even so, what about supplies? Fuel? Water? How are they even gonna have enough boats? If 10,000 people want to go from ship to shore, you need 100 boats carrying 100 people going back and forth
“We can build it, but we don’t know how to bring it to the attention of the world.”
I think that problem can solve itself...
My question is how the ship would withstand storms and waves.
Viking Seagull not as hard as u think
How many lifeboats does it need for when it's hits a glacier?
Something that large would definitely not be affected by any waves
I'm wondering the same thing. With the ship that long the hull is going to flex when it hit rough sea. I'm just not sure what to think about the structural integrity of the ship. Many bulk carriers were lost because the hull flexes in rough sea and cracks quickly formed around the ship and the hull snapped in half
KaibaCorp HQ your believe there will be ice when/ if this is built.
I remember reading about this project like 10 years ago in a magazine. At that time I thought it was totally insane and now I think the same. There is no way how this thing could float. Well, it could, but it would not be possible to take it across the ocean. Like oil tankers - the long ones, they sometimes break in half during storms, so I can´t imagine this thing going through a 40m huge waves. Cool idea though.
Umm, no. First of all look at the planned route. It's mostly along the coast. There's no need for this thing to be crossing oceans week in, week out whether the weather is good or not, as with freight vessels. So if there's chance of storm, you just don't sail, or reroute.
Secondly, the maritime engineers who design ships for a living know a bit more about the subject than you or me and as mentioned even in this video, they're saying it's doable. Dynamic rigidity of the hull etc is nowadays modeled on computers at the earliest staged of the design.
Oh, and "going through 40 m waves"? Buddy, check out the scale of the ship first. It's over a mile long. And several times larger than the largest ships now. It's gonna go through waves just fine. Also, comparing to an oil tanker isn't very sensible if you think about how very differently they are built and how oil tankers have to carry an immense mass, where as a passenger ship is mostly an empty, rigid steel wafer (=not a container filled with liquid). The ships that break in waves are unmaintained rusty tankers from the 1980's that are forced to sail into storms by their operators.
@@iLoveTheseRemoras because of how absolutely massive this thing is, it can’t get very close to the coast, because it would drag along the bottom or the sea. But in a hurricane or tsunami this thing is completely done for
@@fart63 It doesn't actually have any more draft than a regular cruise ship. That's what matters most. So it can go to existing ports just fine as long as the length of the pier is sufficient. It doesn't have to stay for example 10 km from shore 😁
Also, the bigger a vessel is, the better it takes storms. I have been in a couple.
@@iLoveTheseRemoras dude this thing is supposed to have open decks all throughout it, there are supposed to be people walking all over it at all times, not to mention the whole thing is made of glass.. reinforced or not, this thing cannot sail like a normal boat and because of how many lives are at stake if it gets in an accident there is no way they could just take it out into the middle of the ocean where it would take rescue efforts days to get to them
It sounds more practical to make several floating suburbs, which could operate independently, but also connect together and float as a large unit.
I agree,
Break it up into 5-aircraft carriers that can puddlejump between each other and it seems much more doable
This sounds like a cheaper version of rapture from bioshock
Teacher: why are you laughing
Me: nothing
My brain: Roger Gooch
Gooch
Tommaso Gouery “cooch”
Gooch
They must have a sign by their front door that says “welcome to the Goochies”
Itchy gooch
5,000 feet long, so he wants to build a star destroyer on the ocean?!!!
more like an ocean destroyer....eh? eh?? ugh
@@Red_Lanterns_Rage the door is to the left.
I find your lack of faith disturbing.
@@justanotherasian4395 actually it's to my right and it leads to this outside place...
outside frightens me greatly.....
@@rwdplz1 your overconfidence is your weakness
Let's just stick to building ultra tall skyscrapers.