Integral Transforms

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 26 окт 2024

Комментарии • 14

  • @charleshebson7732
    @charleshebson7732 2 года назад +2

    Mr. Mosley - from Downton Abbey to Gresham College. Well done! Actually, I enjoyed this. This also explains why I am a Civil Engineer and not Electrical.

  • @douglasstrother6584
    @douglasstrother6584 2 года назад +3

    Check out "The Forgotten Genius of Oliver Heaviside: A Maverick of Electrical Science" ~ Basil Mahon
    Heaviside was English.

  • @cdgrilleesteemservice7673
    @cdgrilleesteemservice7673 2 года назад +6

    Please fix the spelling in thumbnail.
    Intergral?

  • @billynomates920
    @billynomates920 2 года назад +1

    and the nice thing about v e to the st is that it spells vest.
    also, it is probably wiser to engage the radiologist in discrete fourier transforms than it is to regale the traffic sergeant with the heisenberg uncertainty principle. 🙂

  • @projectmalus
    @projectmalus 2 года назад +1

    Wheel tappers! Thanks.

  • @Oliver_Kaiser
    @Oliver_Kaiser 2 года назад

    This helped a lot. Thanks 😊

  • @nHans
    @nHans 2 года назад +4

    I'm an engineer, so I understood everything ... except why you didn't use the resistor symbol -ww- to represent the resistor. 🤔

    • @TaunoErik
      @TaunoErik 2 года назад +2

      Because -[ ]- is correct resistor symbol here, in Europe!

    • @nHans
      @nHans 2 года назад +3

      ​@@TaunoErik You're right-wow, I didn't know. I had never seen the IEC symbol till today; always used the ANSI/IEEE one.
      Now I'm disappointed-but not surprised-that electrical engineering has multiple conflicting standards ... _even when it's NOT a metric-vs-Imperial issue._ 😢

  • @ferartdesign5634
    @ferartdesign5634 2 года назад +3

    Appallingly bad. The speaker starts by saying how challenging integral transforms are, then descends into a perfectly arcane, obscure and narrowly focused technical lecture that demonstrates how transforms are used in electronics, not what they are. Sadly Richard is a perfect example of why mathematics is so misunderstood by the general community

    • @pdelong42
      @pdelong42 2 года назад

      I thought he did a pretty decent job explaining integral transforms in an accessible way, without alienating people who don't have a ton of mathematical background. It's not easy to strike that balance. My only complaint was his reluctance to demystify imaginary numbers.
      What would you have done differently?

  • @tulliusagrippa5752
    @tulliusagrippa5752 2 года назад +1

    Not terribly incisive.

  • @matthewkelly2399
    @matthewkelly2399 2 года назад +1

    Who thought this was an appropriate lecture? This isn't what people want to see.

    • @pdelong42
      @pdelong42 2 года назад

      I enjoyed it. What *is* appropriate, in your opinion?
      I had assumed the criterion was: you're on faculty at Gresham? Cool, you get to give a lecture. Sure, there's probably *some* vetting, but I gather that's the basic premise.