Dig the concept of having an identifier for a more pure/zero additive whisky. Though the 9.09% rule may have its problems, there's also a risk of stifling innovation if it's taken away. We've talked to lots of distillers all over the world who are stuck with very prescriptive rules for their products, and it often prevents producers from trying new things. You never know where the next great product will come from. Wholeheartedly agree that transparency in labeling is a major issue, though. On our labels, we have to declare allergens, and we have to declare ingredients in non-standard spirits (like moonshine). The flaw in the 9.09% rule is that it does away with the requirement to inform the consumer what's in the bottle because it's technically "whisky".
Distilleries that would like to use the 9.09% as well as be a part of Canadian True would have two parts of their portfolio. One following Canadian True, the other following Canadian Heritage (Heritage allowing for 9.09).
Thanks for this interview guys. Now I have another whisky book to put on Amazon wish list. I already have Ralfy's 3 books, Jim McEwan's "A Journeyman's Journey" and Charles MacLean's "Whiskypedia". DDK's "Canadian Whisky" will fit in just fine. I'm always interested in listening to those who love whisky but are serious critics of the whisky business.
Great talk. The 30 yo crown royal was at the LCBO fall of 2023. Not many bottles and sold out quickly. I enjoyed their Noble collection as well but unfortunately with the exception of the winter wheat version you could only get them in the US
That 9.09% (1/11) rule needs to go. Canadian whisky won't be taken seriously until then. I may listen to this again. Perfect interview, guys! I have the last 2 editions of Davin's books (haven't finished reading the 3rd yet) and they are great. Every whisky lover should pick it up whether you are Canadian or not. Also, thanks for clarifying the 1/11 rule. I wasn't sure if it was just 9.09% something other than whisky or that it could include younger whisky too. It's a complete joke that a Canadian whisky's age statement can include whisky younger than the stated age on the bottle. That's why I stick with Shelter Point, Two Brewers, Macaloney's and other independent producers when it comes to buying Canadian stuff. Keep up the great work guys! Don't let the metrics stop you from producing video's on Canadian stuff!
Nice ! it took me 15-17 years (since 2007-2010) to know WHY Alberta Prem 25 yo + 30 yo were 40-50 $CA . . . wow ! Thx TEACH ! . . . and Happy December !
@@WhiskyInThe6 (( btw, i have a few bottles of Lagavulin 12 yo CS 57.8% Special Release batch 3 (Third Release) lot ...5636 from 2003 : original box, mint (not a scratch) if u wanna trade : say, for your 3 x 250mL unwanted CASK STRENGTH single malt...). sadly, -20mL evaporation loss from neck...
The LCBO currently has 22 viable CR products for sale. I won't count the 50ml or the CR/Coke in a can. That said there are 309,000 bottles of CR products (bought and paid for) available at the LCBO, give or take a couple hundred. If that does not justify sending a few hundred Hand Selected single barrels to Ontario, then nothing does.
This is one terrific education on Canadian Whisky! Great Job.
Great to hear you talk through this. Love the pitch or idea!
Glad you liked it. Let me know what you think in Part 2.
What a great episode! Very informative! Thanks!
Dig the concept of having an identifier for a more pure/zero additive whisky. Though the 9.09% rule may have its problems, there's also a risk of stifling innovation if it's taken away. We've talked to lots of distillers all over the world who are stuck with very prescriptive rules for their products, and it often prevents producers from trying new things. You never know where the next great product will come from.
Wholeheartedly agree that transparency in labeling is a major issue, though. On our labels, we have to declare allergens, and we have to declare ingredients in non-standard spirits (like moonshine). The flaw in the 9.09% rule is that it does away with the requirement to inform the consumer what's in the bottle because it's technically "whisky".
Distilleries that would like to use the 9.09% as well as be a part of Canadian True would have two parts of their portfolio. One following Canadian True, the other following Canadian Heritage (Heritage allowing for 9.09).
Thanks for this interview guys. Now I have another whisky book to put on Amazon wish list. I already have Ralfy's 3 books, Jim McEwan's "A Journeyman's Journey" and Charles MacLean's "Whiskypedia". DDK's "Canadian Whisky" will fit in just fine. I'm always interested in listening to those who love whisky but are serious critics of the whisky business.
Nice collection
now this guy KNOWS whisky!
I am so excited for this!!!
What did you think?
@WhiskyInThe6 loved it, can't wait for part 2.
Great talk. The 30 yo crown royal was at the LCBO fall of 2023. Not many bottles and sold out quickly. I enjoyed their Noble collection as well but unfortunately with the exception of the winter wheat version you could only get them in the US
Didn’t see that one at all.
That 9.09% (1/11) rule needs to go. Canadian whisky won't be taken seriously until then.
I may listen to this again. Perfect interview, guys! I have the last 2 editions of Davin's books (haven't finished reading the 3rd yet) and they are great. Every whisky lover should pick it up whether you are Canadian or not.
Also, thanks for clarifying the 1/11 rule. I wasn't sure if it was just 9.09% something other than whisky or that it could include younger whisky too. It's a complete joke that a Canadian whisky's age statement can include whisky younger than the stated age on the bottle. That's why I stick with Shelter Point, Two Brewers, Macaloney's and other independent producers when it comes to buying Canadian stuff.
Keep up the great work guys! Don't let the metrics stop you from producing video's on Canadian stuff!
Nice ! it took me 15-17 years (since 2007-2010) to know WHY Alberta Prem 25 yo + 30 yo were 40-50 $CA . . . wow ! Thx TEACH ! . . . and Happy December !
Cheers
@@WhiskyInThe6 (( btw, i have a few bottles of Lagavulin 12 yo CS 57.8% Special Release batch 3 (Third Release) lot ...5636 from 2003 : original box, mint (not a scratch) if u wanna trade : say, for your 3 x 250mL unwanted CASK STRENGTH single malt...). sadly, -20mL evaporation loss from neck...
The LCBO currently has 22 viable CR products for sale. I won't count the 50ml or the CR/Coke in a can. That said there are 309,000 bottles of CR products (bought and paid for) available at the LCBO, give or take a couple hundred. If that does not justify sending a few hundred Hand Selected single barrels to Ontario, then nothing does.
Amen
What about the rest of Canada? Do we not exist either?
@@VazzVegas Keep it all in Canada as far as I am concerned.