Gallagher, Enzo, Caicedo can't play at The same time.. Chelsea is better off playing with 2 pivots (Galla-Caicedo, Enzo-Caicedo or Galla-Enzo) and put palmer or chukmweka Behind a striker
@@nateclinton5754 honestly, Enzo is more comfortable playing as anchors rather than further forward... it would be very interesting if Lavia could play because the depth of the midfield players is very strong (Caicedo-Enzo & Lavia-Gallagher), Palmer will have more freedom to play as number 10
@@eliteglobal8407 no sorry cos i think You are a lil bit wrong we can't play the four of them at thesame time... I understand Enzo is more spectacular when He's in for but not now Enzo loves going forward leaving caicedo in the Deep which is so risky Caicedo hasn't had so much prowess and shape, He's still A new lad
Remember when they had a miscommunication at the start of the season however I believe Gallagher should battle with Enzo for a position and Caicedo with Lavia/Santos when he gets fit and when he comes back. We have two players for each position and they should battle it out but Poch always tinkers around with team. Maatsen is having the time of his life and he was begging Poch to play him; imagine having him and Gusto in attack
The biggest mistake of Pchetino, was to make that Caicedo play make for Enzo Fernández. Can't play Fernández and Gallagher together, one of them should be on the bench and give Caicedo to play more freely.
we never knew because poch almost never play gallagher as a defense. i keep speaking out everywhere for it and finally they see the result. gallagher on attack is just a waste of talent.
Then u have to seriously stop watching football, because it's clear u just look at people running up and down doing nothing, we lost and drew some win able games because of the stiffness of that midfield, just play two out of that three and play a 10 we are good to go,then against top teams u can play all three,it mustn't be connor and moises,it can be Enzo and one of the other two,I'm not surprised u said otherwise, never u blame poch any day,because u are literally him when it comes to selection,the only two games we played only two of those 3 we won by 6 goals, get that into ur head,when u play all three it makes the midfield rigid,they will keep passing the ball to themselves inside there while some others are making runs in behind,but when it's only two,u see movement, once the ball gets to one of them,it's going either to the 10 or the wingers or the other partner that overlapped, thank u.
They were good against a horrific everton side. This partnership isn't it. Enzo just needs to be utilised better and is still our best midfielder by far.
@@Jerimiahjones512 They played bad, because we played very good, it's that simple. Last year Man City absolutely demolished Real Madrid 4-0 at the Etihad, does that mean Madrid was a bad team? No. They were a good team, but they were just playing against the best team in the world.
The fact is you can't play those three midfielders together and get the best out of them. For me, Enzo's hipe for now is so much about the name made during the last world cup. He is not yet living up to expectations on a consistent basis.
![Ice On My Teeth - ATEEZ エイティーズ 에이티즈 [Music Bank] | KBS WORLD TV 241115](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/c-n92OgbbwA/mqdefault.jpg)
This partnership has too much energy and I only hope we build on that fr
Gallagher, Enzo, Caicedo can't play at The same time.. Chelsea is better off playing with 2 pivots (Galla-Caicedo, Enzo-Caicedo or Galla-Enzo) and put palmer or chukmweka Behind a striker
I agree
Agree
Your analytics are so right, except for Gallagher and Enzo... that Duo can't fit in
@@nateclinton5754 honestly, Enzo is more comfortable playing as anchors rather than further forward... it would be very interesting if Lavia could play because the depth of the midfield players is very strong (Caicedo-Enzo & Lavia-Gallagher), Palmer will have more freedom to play as number 10
@@eliteglobal8407 no sorry cos i think You are a lil bit wrong
we can't play the four of them at thesame time... I understand Enzo is more spectacular when He's in for but not now
Enzo loves going forward leaving caicedo in the Deep which is so risky
Caicedo hasn't had so much prowess and shape, He's still A new lad
Remember when they had a miscommunication at the start of the season however I believe Gallagher should battle with Enzo for a position and Caicedo with Lavia/Santos when he gets fit and when he comes back. We have two players for each position and they should battle it out but Poch always tinkers around with team. Maatsen is having the time of his life and he was begging Poch to play him; imagine having him and Gusto in attack
The biggest mistake of Pchetino, was to make that Caicedo play make for Enzo Fernández. Can't play Fernández and Gallagher together, one of them should be on the bench and give Caicedo to play more freely.
we never knew because poch almost never play gallagher as a defense.
i keep speaking out everywhere for it and finally they see the result.
gallagher on attack is just a waste of talent.
Exactly, it's not so hard to see
If at all Pochetino can be playing Enzo Fernandez as no 8 rather than Gallagher they would cook.
This is not the partnership we need and none of you can tell me otherwise.
I’m with u on this
Then u have to seriously stop watching football, because it's clear u just look at people running up and down doing nothing, we lost and drew some win able games because of the stiffness of that midfield, just play two out of that three and play a 10 we are good to go,then against top teams u can play all three,it mustn't be connor and moises,it can be Enzo and one of the other two,I'm not surprised u said otherwise, never u blame poch any day,because u are literally him when it comes to selection,the only two games we played only two of those 3 we won by 6 goals, get that into ur head,when u play all three it makes the midfield rigid,they will keep passing the ball to themselves inside there while some others are making runs in behind,but when it's only two,u see movement, once the ball gets to one of them,it's going either to the 10 or the wingers or the other partner that overlapped, thank u.
@user-ph7fl4mc7e and you have my friend have to just let people have their opinion. I am not reading what u said because i don't care.
Bing bong
@@k-mc12slayerentertainment.85If you don't really care, you shouldn't be here😂😂😂😂
They were good against a horrific everton side. This partnership isn't it. Enzo just needs to be utilised better and is still our best midfielder by far.
When Everton get beat, they generally don’t get beaten by a lot. A 6-0 is impressive against any team in the premier league.
@@McFlashhThey played like a league 1 team. But regardless of that enzo is a key player for us and one good match without him doesn't disprove that.
@@Jerimiahjones512 They played bad, because we played very good, it's that simple. Last year Man City absolutely demolished Real Madrid 4-0 at the Etihad, does that mean Madrid was a bad team? No. They were a good team, but they were just playing against the best team in the world.
The fact is you can't play those three midfielders together and get the best out of them.
For me, Enzo's hipe for now is so much about the name made during the last world cup. He is not yet living up to expectations on a consistent basis.
@@McFlashh They played bad because they're a bad team. Look at where they are in the table.
Lol they are gonna get exposed with a solud team without Enzo. 🤣
Enzo sucks what are you smoking we are way better without him