Conor Gallagher and Moises Caicedo...The PARTNERSHIP We Never Knew We Needed
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 апр 2024
- Conor Gallagher and Moises Caicedo...The PARTNERSHIP We Never Knew We Needed
If you enjoyed this video then be sure to like, comment and subscribe for more dope content 🔥
💯 Subscribe to my main channel (GalacticOz Podcast)
/ @thegalacticoz
My channel is heavily inspired by Football Iconic, Daily Dose of Football, RabonaTV & Maqwell! This is the first of this kind of content here in Australia, and it's about damn time it happened! The name of my channel pays homage to the iconic Australian football show, The World Game, which aired on SBS between 2001-2019 🙌🏾
I must state that in no way, shape or form am I intending to infringe the rights of the copyright holder. Content used is strictly for research/reviewing purposes and to help educate. All under the Fair Use law.
"Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use."
If you find anything that belongs to you and you'd like it to be taken down, please contact me via email for removal: info@fajrproductions.com
Thanks!
#chelsea #football #premierleague 
Спорт
![DDG & Blueface - Top ft. Swae Lee [Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/p2wIDXar9ns/mqdefault.jpg)
This partnership has too much energy and I only hope we build on that fr
Gallagher, Enzo, Caicedo can't play at The same time.. Chelsea is better off playing with 2 pivots (Galla-Caicedo, Enzo-Caicedo or Galla-Enzo) and put palmer or chukmweka Behind a striker
I agree
Agree
Your analytics are so right, except for Gallagher and Enzo... that Duo can't fit in
@@nateclinton5754 honestly, Enzo is more comfortable playing as anchors rather than further forward... it would be very interesting if Lavia could play because the depth of the midfield players is very strong (Caicedo-Enzo & Lavia-Gallagher), Palmer will have more freedom to play as number 10
@@eliteglobal8407 no sorry cos i think You are a lil bit wrong
we can't play the four of them at thesame time... I understand Enzo is more spectacular when He's in for but not now
Enzo loves going forward leaving caicedo in the Deep which is so risky
Caicedo hasn't had so much prowess and shape, He's still A new lad
Remember when they had a miscommunication at the start of the season however I believe Gallagher should battle with Enzo for a position and Caicedo with Lavia/Santos when he gets fit and when he comes back. We have two players for each position and they should battle it out but Poch always tinkers around with team. Maatsen is having the time of his life and he was begging Poch to play him; imagine having him and Gusto in attack
The biggest mistake of Pchetino, was to make that Caicedo play make for Enzo Fernández. Can't play Fernández and Gallagher together, one of them should be on the bench and give Caicedo to play more freely.
we never knew because poch almost never play gallagher as a defense.
i keep speaking out everywhere for it and finally they see the result.
gallagher on attack is just a waste of talent.
Exactly, it's not so hard to see
If at all Pochetino can be playing Enzo Fernandez as no 8 rather than Gallagher they would cook.
This is not the partnership we need and none of you can tell me otherwise.
I’m with u on this
Then u have to seriously stop watching football, because it's clear u just look at people running up and down doing nothing, we lost and drew some win able games because of the stiffness of that midfield, just play two out of that three and play a 10 we are good to go,then against top teams u can play all three,it mustn't be connor and moises,it can be Enzo and one of the other two,I'm not surprised u said otherwise, never u blame poch any day,because u are literally him when it comes to selection,the only two games we played only two of those 3 we won by 6 goals, get that into ur head,when u play all three it makes the midfield rigid,they will keep passing the ball to themselves inside there while some others are making runs in behind,but when it's only two,u see movement, once the ball gets to one of them,it's going either to the 10 or the wingers or the other partner that overlapped, thank u.
@user-ph7fl4mc7e and you have my friend have to just let people have their opinion. I am not reading what u said because i don't care.
Bing bong
@@k-mc12slayerentertainment.85If you don't really care, you shouldn't be here😂😂😂😂
Lol they are gonna get exposed with a solud team without Enzo. 🤣
Enzo sucks what are you smoking we are way better without him
They were good against a horrific everton side. This partnership isn't it. Enzo just needs to be utilised better and is still our best midfielder by far.
When Everton get beat, they generally don’t get beaten by a lot. A 6-0 is impressive against any team in the premier league.
@@McFlashhThey played like a league 1 team. But regardless of that enzo is a key player for us and one good match without him doesn't disprove that.
@@Jerimiahjones512 They played bad, because we played very good, it's that simple. Last year Man City absolutely demolished Real Madrid 4-0 at the Etihad, does that mean Madrid was a bad team? No. They were a good team, but they were just playing against the best team in the world.
The fact is you can't play those three midfielders together and get the best out of them.
For me, Enzo's hipe for now is so much about the name made during the last world cup. He is not yet living up to expectations on a consistent basis.
@@McFlashh They played bad because they're a bad team. Look at where they are in the table.