🎉❤🌈 Fantastic teaching! Thank so much Rinpoche!! The way you teach, make precious Buddhism concepts so reachable to understand in this life time. ❤💚❤💚🌈🌹🌹🌹
This is one of the best explanations I've heard on the topic, which is also discussed in classical Indian Nyāya, Vyākaraṇa, and Vedānta. Also, I love the 'Materialist, Abrahamic-residual Buddhists' designation: not a pejorative, but a recognition of the fact that many people who have English/Western Language educations (and those educations not in Western Languages but who depend on translated western curriculums only) are inherently taught in binaries, and that to learn Buddha Dharma (or any of the other Dharmas), one has to have the intellectual humility to add the Dharmic frameworks alongside on their own terms.
❤the four criteria often mentioned in relation to "pragmatic truth" or "pragmatic validity." These criteria are: ❤Consensus ❤Utility (Usefulness) ❤Cause and Condition ❤Falsifiability "Falsifiability" means that a claim or theory can be tested and potentially proven false.
Saddharma Pundarika Sutra （妙法莲华经） * The Buddha did explain clearly why his teachings has to start from the four noble truths in India for the human realm.
Amazing, amazing. I love his videos. Your holiness don't you want to know and see where the first Tibetan Sangaram was opened solely for foreigners. This is north of Patna on the northern banks of the Ganges. Xuan Zangs lovely book led me to the Sangaram. According to him three Sramanas from across the SNOWY MOUNTAINS (From the area around 'Taro Co' lake in northern Tibet) crossed over to India on a pilgrimage to holy Buddhist sites. Indians fail to understand who they are and no one gives them food and shelter and sometimes beat them up. They were lying by the side of the road dying when the King rode up. He inquired about them and when they told him their story, the King realised a Sangaram was needed for foreigners only where Indians won't be allowed. So this can be regarded as the first Tibetan Sangaram in India. Those days Indians had pierced ears because they wore ear rings. Foreigners had unpierced ears so this Sangaram was for unpierced ears. Those days Indians didn't know about Tibet so this Sangaram was for unpierced years, meaning foreigners. Today that Sangaram is a village and that King is the local village deity. This story proves that Buddhism went to Tibet prior to Xuan Zangs epic journey to India. So Tibetans will have to study how and when Buddhism went to Tibet. Because Xuan Zang seems to infer that Buddhism went to Tibet much earlier than what the great masters claim today. I have made a video on this topic titled, ‘First Tibetan Sangaram in ancient India.’
☸🕉Rinpoche my understanding of the Mahayana makes reincarnation very simple in that since this life is like a dream, we can have another dream of another life, and another and another and another. Some people call that reincarnation. What do you think about this simplification?🕉☸
good simplification. you should remember that each rebirth or reincarnation for ordinary beings is conditioned by deeds that were done in that life and in former lives. at the time of death there arises a rebirth-linking consciousness based on the individual's karma, either predominantly good or predominantly negative, and this consciousness can either be of a positive or negative bent. this will affect where that next "dream" occurs!
or it's like respawning in a videogame You lose your inventory, but get to keep the xp! Lmao They don't call it a simulation for nothing... We act based on our programming and reality also behaves according to the "source code". You do main story line and side quests, to get loot, better gear and to "level up your character" It's literally a game. Lmao
I think when someone experience the ultimate truth very easy for them to handle relative truth Like buddha do that It's difficult for only our self those only understand ultimate truth buy books only not through experience
Functionality is the word he was looking for as the second point of conventional truth,after common consensus I think. Better than the term “purpose”. A conventional object must be able to perform a function.
I love your videos. Your holiness don't you want to know and see where the first Tibetan Sangaram was opened solely for foreigners. This is north of Patna on the northern banks of the Ganges. Xuan Zangs lovely book led me to the Sangaram. According to him three Sramanas from across the SNOWY MOUNTAINS (From the area around 'Taro Co' lake in northern Tibet) crossed over to India on a pilgrimage to holy Buddhist sites. Indians fail to understand who they are and no one gives them food and shelter and sometimes beat them up. They were lying by the side of the road dying when the King rode up. He inquired about them and when they told him their story, the King realised a Sangaram was needed for foreigners only where Indians won't be allowed. So this can be regarded as the first Tibetan Sangaram in India. Those days Indians had pierced ears because they wore ear rings. Foreigners had unpierced ears so this Sangaram was for unpierced ears. Those days Indians didn't know about Tibet so this Sangaram was for unpierced years, meaning foreigners. Today that Sangaram is a village and that King is the local village deity. This story proves that Buddhism went to Tibet prior to Xuan Zangs epic journey to India. So Tibetans will have to study how and when Buddhism went to Tibet. Because Xuan Zang seems to infer that Buddhism went to Tibet much earlier than what the great masters claim today. I have made a video on this topic titled, ‘First Tibetan Sangaram in ancient India.’
maybe relative truth is the problem? Because it contains dualism.! Maybe reli relative truth isn’t true! Because it contains the eight worldly Dharmas? And maybe ultimate truth is the truth ! When you say it has problems because relative truth is causing them !😮 if you put them together and they are relative, maybe you just use what is useful and accept what is not when I say accept ignore what is not . I understand your problem. It is everybody’s and that is the truth itself ultimately!
"Relative truth is the problem" is the problem, because "because it contains dualism" contains dualism. Absolute truth is not other than relative truth, nor is it the same, nor both nor neither.
That depends on your social status in America. Wealth, position, birth right dictate what happens when you face justice. The unification of this is under the umbrella of Hypocrisy.
Dzongsar Khyentse Rinpoche is the most magnificent Tibetan Buddhist teacher.
Is that relative, ultimate or absolute? Can you prove it?
🎉❤🌈 Fantastic teaching! Thank so much Rinpoche!! The way you teach, make precious Buddhism concepts so reachable to understand in this life time. ❤💚❤💚🌈🌹🌹🌹
Nam Mo Buddha, Nam Mo Dharma, Nam Mo Sangha 🙏
This is one of the best explanations I've heard on the topic, which is also discussed in classical Indian Nyāya, Vyākaraṇa, and Vedānta. Also, I love the 'Materialist, Abrahamic-residual Buddhists' designation: not a pejorative, but a recognition of the fact that many people who have English/Western Language educations (and those educations not in Western Languages but who depend on translated western curriculums only) are inherently taught in binaries, and that to learn Buddha Dharma (or any of the other Dharmas), one has to have the intellectual humility to add the Dharmic frameworks alongside on their own terms.
This is also why I found his way of explanation based on different cultural backgrounds and perspectives worth listening to.
All these later schools of India belong to a time after the Buddha and Nagarjuna.
❤the four criteria often mentioned in relation to "pragmatic truth" or "pragmatic validity." These criteria are:
❤Consensus
❤Utility (Usefulness)
❤Cause and Condition
❤Falsifiability
"Falsifiability" means that a claim or theory can be tested and potentially proven false.
Saddharma Pundarika Sutra （妙法莲华经） * The Buddha did explain clearly why his teachings has to start from the four noble truths in India for the human realm.
This was really good, especially about the unification of reality and ultimate reality but please don't edit.
Ultimate truth
Amazing, Amazing,Amazing
Please listen 🙏🙏🙏😻
Amazing, amazing. I love his videos. Your holiness don't you want to know and see where the first Tibetan Sangaram was opened solely for foreigners. This is north of Patna on the northern banks of the Ganges. Xuan Zangs lovely book led me to the Sangaram. According to him three Sramanas from across the SNOWY MOUNTAINS (From the area around 'Taro Co' lake in northern Tibet) crossed over to India on a pilgrimage to holy Buddhist sites. Indians fail to understand who they are and no one gives them food and shelter and sometimes beat them up. They were lying by the side of the road dying when the King rode up. He inquired about them and when they told him their story, the King realised a Sangaram was needed for foreigners only where Indians won't be allowed. So this can be regarded as the first Tibetan Sangaram in India. Those days Indians had pierced ears because they wore ear rings. Foreigners had unpierced ears so this Sangaram was for unpierced ears. Those days Indians didn't know about Tibet so this Sangaram was for unpierced years, meaning foreigners. Today that Sangaram is a village and that King is the local village deity. This story proves that Buddhism went to Tibet prior to Xuan Zangs epic journey to India. So Tibetans will have to study how and when Buddhism went to Tibet. Because Xuan Zang seems to infer that Buddhism went to Tibet much earlier than what the great masters claim today. I have made a video on this topic titled, ‘First Tibetan Sangaram in ancient India.’
Thank you so much 🙏🙏🙏
this is a brilliant reminder...thank you for making this clip
Absolute truth
Where we can Find the full video? Thank you!
☸🕉Rinpoche my understanding of the Mahayana makes reincarnation very simple in that since this life is like a dream, we can have another dream of another life, and another and another and another. Some people call that reincarnation. What do you think about this simplification?🕉☸
good simplification. you should remember that each rebirth or reincarnation for ordinary beings is conditioned by deeds that were done in that life and in former lives. at the time of death there arises a rebirth-linking consciousness based on the individual's karma, either predominantly good or predominantly negative, and this consciousness can either be of a positive or negative bent. this will affect where that next "dream" occurs!
I think having dreams of being another person is different from taking rebirth, which is also dreamlike.
All of our experience is dreamlike…
And the purpose of Dharma is to wake up from the dream.
or it's like respawning in a videogame
You lose your inventory, but get to keep the xp! Lmao
They don't call it a simulation for nothing... We act based on our programming and reality also behaves according to the "source code".
You do main story line and side quests, to get loot, better gear and to "level up your character"
It's literally a game.
Lmao
I think when someone experience the ultimate truth very easy for them to handle relative truth
Like buddha do that
It's difficult for only our self those only understand ultimate truth buy books only not through experience
Ultimate reality
Functionality is the word he was looking for as the second point of conventional truth,after common consensus I think. Better than the term “purpose”. A conventional object must be able to perform a function.
You could also say that it's about what "works", as in pragmatism.
版主您好，請問這個開示的完整內容在哪裡可以看到？謝謝
🙏🙏🙏
🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼
❤🙏🙏🙏
And relative truth
👍👍👍
🙏🌈🙏
I love your videos. Your holiness don't you want to know and see where the first Tibetan Sangaram was opened solely for foreigners. This is north of Patna on the northern banks of the Ganges. Xuan Zangs lovely book led me to the Sangaram. According to him three Sramanas from across the SNOWY MOUNTAINS (From the area around 'Taro Co' lake in northern Tibet) crossed over to India on a pilgrimage to holy Buddhist sites. Indians fail to understand who they are and no one gives them food and shelter and sometimes beat them up. They were lying by the side of the road dying when the King rode up. He inquired about them and when they told him their story, the King realised a Sangaram was needed for foreigners only where Indians won't be allowed. So this can be regarded as the first Tibetan Sangaram in India. Those days Indians had pierced ears because they wore ear rings. Foreigners had unpierced ears so this Sangaram was for unpierced ears. Those days Indians didn't know about Tibet so this Sangaram was for unpierced years, meaning foreigners. Today that Sangaram is a village and that King is the local village deity. This story proves that Buddhism went to Tibet prior to Xuan Zangs epic journey to India. So Tibetans will have to study how and when Buddhism went to Tibet. Because Xuan Zang seems to infer that Buddhism went to Tibet much earlier than what the great masters claim today. I have made a video on this topic titled, ‘First Tibetan Sangaram in ancient India.’
🙏💙🙏💎🙏
and maybe the problem is language?
They said to me as a child sit down, shut up and listen .
I aspire to understand the two truths.
Stay alone and transform
Watch your mind and emotions
Watch your thinking
Watch your thinking
Observe the thinker
Rinpoche kyabsu chewo ()()()
The video is all cuted and confusing in the final part, doesnt respect the real time of what did happen...
The talk is being translated between pauses (Rinpoche looks to his left) and translations are removed from the video.
@@cfriedalek Ok...sorry and thank you
maybe relative truth is the problem? Because it contains dualism.! Maybe reli relative truth isn’t true! Because it contains the eight worldly Dharmas?
And maybe ultimate truth is the truth !
When you say it has problems because relative truth is causing them !😮
if you put them together and they are relative, maybe you just use what is useful and accept what is not when I say accept ignore what is not . I understand your problem. It is everybody’s and that is the truth itself ultimately!
"Relative truth is the problem" is the problem, because "because it contains dualism" contains dualism. Absolute truth is not other than relative truth, nor is it the same, nor both nor neither.
Please make it less abstract!
ACTUALLY, IN AMERICA YOU'RE GUILTY TILL PROVEN INNOCENT, WHICH IS DISGUSTING
OKAY
That depends on your social status in America. Wealth, position, birth right dictate what happens when you face justice. The unification of this is under the umbrella of Hypocrisy.
❤