Second-order reaction (with calculus) | Kinetics | Chemistry | Khan Academy

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 4 янв 2025

Комментарии • 14

  • @sukanya.k7203
    @sukanya.k7203 7 лет назад +4

    I really liked ur explanation. Thanku so much for ur easy explanation

  • @mwanidanyirenda9584
    @mwanidanyirenda9584 3 года назад

    Couldn't be explained any better 🙏

  • @sunberrezueta
    @sunberrezueta 8 лет назад +1

    I really like your explanation but can you plllz change the way instead of writing put pictures so the information will stick forever especially in biology coz sometimes I start being bored with this way
    i really love you and thanks ;)

  • @vatsalpurohit3933
    @vatsalpurohit3933 7 лет назад +4

    That integration part seemed a bit complex ( no maths in 11-12th😅)

    • @invisible8239
      @invisible8239 7 лет назад +1

      I didn't take maths in 11- 12th either but they do teach a bit of calculus for physics( i assume you're from India) , and he explained it pretty smoothly, i don't think it was complicated.

    • @vatsalpurohit3933
      @vatsalpurohit3933 7 лет назад +1

      Invisible Actually, I hated(was not so good,to be honest 😅) in physics at school and besides, we didn't have regular physics teacher at school.

    • @vatsalpurohit3933
      @vatsalpurohit3933 7 лет назад

      Invisible and same goes for maths

    • @wrichik_basu
      @wrichik_basu 6 лет назад

      it's difficult to pursue science if you don't take maths, and you shouldn't do that either. no school allows that combination, even if you plan to take up biology later on in college. even biology has some maths involved, especially in genetics.

  • @sarithamam1683
    @sarithamam1683 4 года назад

    Whr is the minus symbol gone

  • @Tanveermalik011
    @Tanveermalik011 6 лет назад

    here in India we say mx + c

  • @BrandonSLockey
    @BrandonSLockey 4 года назад

    thanks i was rusty af lol

  • @tiffanitdg8708
    @tiffanitdg8708 5 лет назад

    Great video. I have one question though, do we ignore the integration for the concentration for d[A]? I realized that we only integrated ]A]^-2