After he did , I was just wondering what happens if , and thought that it would become and would stuck there. Then he just answered in 12:25. He read my mind! 🤯
Here is the playlist for the course: ruclips.net/p/PLUl4u3cNGP60cspQn3N9dYRPiyVWDd80G. For more information, see the course on MIT OpenCourseWare at: ocw.mit.edu/8-04S16. Best wishes on your studies!
if particles are created near a black hole, and the "matter" is pulled into the gravity well, is "dark matter" just the stuff that is left after itss opposite was consumed?
After he did , I was just wondering what happens if , and thought that it would become and would stuck there. Then he just answered in 12:25.
He read my mind! 🤯
Finally I understand, MIT ftw fr
at 13:20 he defines (dx)^2 = - . Although the outcome is the same, should the term should be ^2?
Yes, he missed the ^2 term.
Are these the eigenvalues of the creation and annihilation operators ? 3:09
18:02 why can't we simply apply aa' and a'a on phi_n??
Please Give related next and previous lacture links in description , we got problem to find 2nd lacture of this video
Here is the playlist for the course: ruclips.net/p/PLUl4u3cNGP60cspQn3N9dYRPiyVWDd80G. For more information, see the course on MIT OpenCourseWare at: ocw.mit.edu/8-04S16. Best wishes on your studies!
if particles are created near a black hole, and the "matter" is pulled into the gravity well, is "dark matter" just the stuff that is left after itss opposite was consumed?
Dark matter (if it exists) is still matter, you're thinking about matter-antimatter pairs. They are quite different things.
zwiebach fiera
Great Explanation ..
Thanks ❤️🤍
This is helpful ❤️🤍
Un desastre