KURSK: Russia Fights Back!

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 18 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 40

  • @darrencorrigan8505
    @darrencorrigan8505 Месяц назад +6

    Thanks, SkruffyTalez.

  • @CharlesRyan-f3j
    @CharlesRyan-f3j Месяц назад +5

    Really like your use of the new map software. Thank you, Skruffy .

    • @SkruffyTalez_TheWarzone
      @SkruffyTalez_TheWarzone  Месяц назад +2

      Its a fun tool, ngl

    • @marcusaurilius1488
      @marcusaurilius1488 Месяц назад +1

      @@SkruffyTalez_TheWarzone I dunno if isw is accurate on veseloe. reading the isw report that russian movement is from 24th. also that russian assault on plekovo noel has a video of russian armor getting wrecked by fpv drones in that open area to plekovo. with that strange map isw had up for like a week or two, i am not putting relevance on isw maps until other mappers follow.

    • @marcusaurilius1488
      @marcusaurilius1488 Месяц назад

      @@SkruffyTalez_TheWarzone looking at nasa fire maps not seeing anything at veseloye as one would expect if there was that russian offensive. it looks like the fighting moved north and north east actually from fire maps.
      there is alot of fire east of tetkino.
      there is alot of fire at plekovo. so plekovo russian movement is possible.
      if russia was really in veseloe and moved out into the fields in the tree lines, one would expect alot of ukrainian artillery and jdams dropping but i dont see it.
      firms.modaps.eosdis.nasa.gov/map/#d:24hrs;@34.55,51.29,12.00z

    • @SkruffyTalez_TheWarzone
      @SkruffyTalez_TheWarzone  Месяц назад

      @@marcusaurilius1488 which is why I point out its so far only ISW that has these updates and it doesnt show, yet, on any other map

    • @marcusaurilius1488
      @marcusaurilius1488 Месяц назад

      @@SkruffyTalez_TheWarzone i think the russian offensive at veseloye likely failed with lack of artillery fire in and around veseloye. even the possibility of being able to move in enough troops in that fire pocket to north, basically to go into veseloye is insanity. its all wooded hillly area in that narrow entrance as well. i dont think they could have sent armor through there.
      the town is relatively small, so if they sent more than 200 soldiers into veseloye the troop density would likely have made it an exercise in stupidity.
      it would probably be smarter to evacuate troops out to the north rather than send 500 russian soldiers into that narrow wooded gap in the north that is in direct and indirect fire from ukrainian artillery, drones, and small arms.
      i think that artillery barrage was ukraine hitting russian soldiers evacuating out to the north. its basically surrounded on 3 sides with virtually no logistics routes.
      it would be like ukraine sending troops into vugledar instead of evacuating. i just dont see russia sending alot of soldiers through that fire pocket with no logistics.

  • @ScottTaggart65
    @ScottTaggart65 Месяц назад +2

    Thanks for the update

  • @petervankan1
    @petervankan1 Месяц назад +5

    Russia has been oushing back in Kursk for weeks now. One can conclude it is not going well. The 3 October deadline will not be met, nor the half October new dealine.

  • @dka618
    @dka618 Месяц назад +2

    thanks

  • @harold22774
    @harold22774 Месяц назад +4

    Well done on your new skill of Cartography, looks good,!
    It's seems difficult to defend empty fields for either side and russia generally
    has difficulty in dislodging Ukraine from urban areas.
    On a side note I seen in kupyansk that 2 columns of russians one of 40 vehicles and
    another 20 were spotted by Ukraine and within 20 minutes all were destroyed or damaged.
    So when you say that reinforcing vesiloe along the main road will be a problem it seems that Ukraine
    have noticed that too... Good summary skruffy

  • @solidfoelife
    @solidfoelife Месяц назад +2

    Wait, you said Russia was going to take Vasele in the next few days!!!

    • @SkruffyTalez_TheWarzone
      @SkruffyTalez_TheWarzone  Месяц назад +1

      @@solidfoelife no, I said Ukraine would probably take Veseloye in a few days. But that Russia would more than likely hold out for as long as possible, to the extreme, since thats how Russia handles defense in this war.

    • @Daragh-x3d
      @Daragh-x3d Месяц назад

      😂😂😂😂😂😂 the fact that an invading army has to defend its starting point tells us everything we need to know about the Russian armies ability to wage war

    • @solidfoelife
      @solidfoelife Месяц назад

      @@Daragh-x3d how’s Vulhedar

    • @harold22774
      @harold22774 Месяц назад +1

      @@solidfoelife still here stinking out the place with your fascist views . your a poor excuse for a human being

    • @harleyquinn8202
      @harleyquinn8202 Месяц назад

      @@Daragh-x3d Yes, no need to send our tax dollars to Ukraine. They are doing fine on their own.

  • @mikusoxlongius
    @mikusoxlongius Месяц назад +1

    Vulhedar has fallen.

    • @SkruffyTalez_TheWarzone
      @SkruffyTalez_TheWarzone  Месяц назад +3

      Damn RUclips messing up my replies... lets try again:
      It has taken Russia 900+ days to have any form of success at Vuhledar. It has cost Russia thousands of dead soldiers and hundreds of destroyed vehicles. Vuhledar is proof of the incompetense of the Russian military, the effectiveness of western weapons and of the courage and bravery of the Ukrainian soldier. Vuhledar is not a victory. It is a catastrophic failure.

    • @mikusoxlongius
      @mikusoxlongius Месяц назад

      @@SkruffyTalez_TheWarzone I used to believe, too. Then Reality set in.

    • @mediocremodeler5174
      @mediocremodeler5174 Месяц назад +2

      @@mikusoxlongiusI used to believe Russia would win too, then nearly three years passed, nato added two members and Russia is having to beg borrow and buy weapons from North Korea and Iran all while the front line is now in Russia. Russia scored an own goal in Ukraine.

    • @giovanni-ed7zq
      @giovanni-ed7zq Месяц назад +3

      @@mikusoxlongius its just a town and its flattened. do you realize russia lost 3 armored brigades at vugledar and the 155th naval infantry brigade was destroyed there twice over? that was last year. russia likely took another 8k casualties taking vugledar this summer. so 32k casualties for russia just for the small town of vugledar. the two towns ukraine retreated to are on high ground so they are like 2 vugledars.

    • @giovanni-ed7zq
      @giovanni-ed7zq Месяц назад +1

      @@mikusoxlongius vugledar served it purpose russia probably has 12k kia and 20k wia from just vugledar. and because russian evacuations are poor, likely over half of that 20k wia is amputations. so its a nice burden on the russian government providing medical care and benefits for those amputees for next 50 years.

  • @Сергей-щ7ж8ы
    @Сергей-щ7ж8ы Месяц назад

    In total, during the fighting in the Kursk direction, the enemy lost more than 19,250 soldiers, 135 tanks, 65 infantry fighting vehicles, 98 armored personnel carriers, 859 armored combat vehicles, 569 vehicles, 155 artillery pieces, 33 multiple rocket launchers, including eight HIMARS missiles and six MLRS manufactured by the United States., nine anti-aircraft missile launchers, five transport and loading vehicles, 38 electronic warfare stations, nine counter-battery radars, three air defense radars, 19 units of engineering and other equipment, including 11 engineering barrage vehicles, one UR-77 mine clearance unit, as well as two armored repair vehicles. and evacuation vehicles. Russia confidently continues to destroy the Nazis.