@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat No, their closet genetic populations are the Negritos and some South Asian population who score high AASI like the Paniyas, Ainus and Tibetians share with Andamanese the same Paternal lineage.
@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat salar lives in Qinghai province which is far away from uighur~ They identified themselves as Hui, muslim ppl, in another word "Donggan" but not salar
Hey bro, do you have results for the Jarawa Andaman tribe? I can bet they will score even more South Asian because they are more isolated then Onge. I am assuming Jarawa will be some where between 60-70% South Asian. This component is directly related to Ancestral South Indian component in India/South Asia
The reason why they're getting a bit of Japanese is because of the shared DNA with the Jomon people and the Japanese have a bit of the old Jomon ancestry.
Yeah it's the deep East Eurasian lineage that is shared between Andamanese, Jomon, Ancient Tibetans, AASI and Hoabinhians and also probably from carry over regarding their Y-DNA heritage.
The average Japanese has 60% Yellow River Farmers (typical of East Asia) + 20% Amur River Farmers + 20% Hunter Gatherers of the Jomon culture. The DNA of the Japanese is very similar to the Koreans but without the Jomon admixture, the Jomon DNA is highly divergent from other modern Asian populations, they separated from the Ancient Northeast Asia 28,000 years ago.
In other words, the Onge are 100% East Eurasian (that South Asian ancestry is obviously picking up the AASI-related ancestry that the Andamanese have).
@Aldo Steinbach ur descended from the anatolian neolithic farmers or early neolithic farmers.. they originated from anatolia and they introduced farming or agriculture to europe and many regions like north africa and the caucasus, they were lightskinned, dark haired and eyed and they replaced the dark skinned blue eyed western hunter gatherers who lived all across europe (west, central and the balkans). They carried paternal haplogroup G2a and maternal haplogroup N and H (im not sure with the mtdna).. they make up 50%-60% of southern european genome (autosomal) and 30%-40% of northern europeans genome (british isles, scandinavia, germany, poland) while they make 10%-20% of northeast europeans genome (balts, finns, russians), sardinians score the highest early european farmer component (80%-90%). one of the most famous neolithic cultures in europe is the globural amphora, thisd culture originated in central europe (poland) they were 70% neolithic farmers and 30% WHG's they were lightskinned, brown haired with some dark blonde highlights and variable eyed (brown, blue), and the funnelbeakers (scandinavia, northern germany and holland) they were 60%-70% anatolian neolithic and 40%-30% scandinavian hunter gatherers (I GUESS) they adapted blonde and blue eyes genes from the SHG's. . I'm algerian berber from northeast algeria and i score 45% anatolian neolithic :)
@Hoor daily with Ayesha Karim north african genome is an admxiture of iberomaurisians and anatolian neolithic farmers, modern north africans are mostly olive, light skinned, dark haired and eyed, they're 25%-40% iberomaurisian and 30%-45% early european farmers. early european farmers were lightskinned, dark haired and eyed and iberomaurisians were light brown skinned, dark haired and eyed and they were 70%-80% west eurasian derived and 30%-20% sub saharan african derived and taforalt sample from northdern morocco was 65% west eurasian derived and 35% sub saharan derived, u can see his facial reconstruction on ancestral whispers site.
look at the video. They score 57% South Asian. Same as Indians. I always tell people that Andamanese populations are closes to South Asians, Because they are directly related to AASI of South Asia. Yet fools keep saying they are from somewhere else
look at the video. They score 57% South Asian. Same as Indians. I always tell people that Andamanese populations are closes to South Asians, Because they are directly related to AASI of South Asia. Yet fools keep saying they are from somewhere else. They are in Bay of Bengal India afterall. I can bet Jarawa and North Sentinel will score even more south Asian if tested
look at the video. They score 57% South Asian. Same as Indians. I always tell people that Andamanese populations are closes to South Asians, Because they are directly related to AASI of South Asia. Yet fools keep saying they are from somewhere else
At one point Indians looks like them 100% before Indians mixed with caucasians, these people carry the original Indian/South Asian dna, which most Indians also have still in large portions, but Indians mixed with Caucasians
Fascinating. An Onge related population once lived in India and formed one significant part of the Indian genetic makeup. This is why they are scoring high South Asian percentage 😊
The Onge of the Andaman Islands are considered to be Basal Eastern Eurasians, and are considered to be the ancestors of the AASI (India), Pacific and East Asians. The first anatomically modern individual in China was Tianyuan Man, 45,000 years old, who was genetically very similar to the current Onge and the Aeta of the Philippines. In the Pacific they became isolated and gave rise to the Melanesians and Papuans. In India the AASI mixed with Iranian farmers and Indoeuropeans from the Steppes to give rise to the current Indians.
@@Deira854Iranian Neolithic have 9% Onge like DNA, Caucasian Hunter Gatherers 4% Onge like, Indoeuropeans of the Steppes 5%, as modeled with the G25 calculator.
@@Deira854Pakistanis have an Autosomal DNA similar to the Harappan civilization (65% Iranian Neolithic plus 35% AASI), with the difference that modern Pakistanis have more Indowuropean DNA between 10% to 30% (depending on ethnicity), and retain 30% of AASI, the rest of the DNA is Iranian Neolithic.
It means that the sample is only compared to one sample, as opposed to mixing samples. The numbers after the @ are Euclidean distance. The smaller the number, the better the fit.
look at the video. They score 57% South Asian. Same as Indians. I always tell people that Andamanese populations are closes to South Asians, Because they are directly related to AASI of South Asia. Yet fools keep saying they are from somewhere else. They are in Bay of Bengal India afterall
look at the video. They score 57% South Asian. Same as Indians. I always tell people that Andamanese populations are closes to South Asians, Because they are directly related to AASI of South Asia. Yet fools keep saying they are from somewhere else. They are in Bay of Bengal India afterall
Aasi is kinda related with hohanbhian who later become Malaysian negrito. Filipino negrito are distantly related with them and more related with papuan and Australian aborigines.
This why the idea of "race" is a fallacy. Ive been posting about Andaman Islanders for over a decade on how their markers changed after leaving the African continent over 50,000 years and isolation. They maintained their black skin but their genetics altered into the environment they settled along with possible genetic drift.
@@Yow531 just because you have similar skin doesn't make you the same. They left the continent maybe 50,000 years ago and their genetics changed but their skin remained very black.
That's right, but their genetic relationship is very old. The Onge are Eastern Basals, this population arrived from the Arabian Peninsula 60,000 years ago, and was isolated on the island. On the continent the Basals were differentiated into Ancestral South Asians and Ancestral North Asians, the Ancestral North Asia gave rise to the South Asians such as the Tibetans, East Asians such as the Mongols or the Chinese, a population of Northern Ancestors emigrated to Japan thousands of years before the typical East Asians emerged, this population gave rise to the Jomon, later from Korea they arrived the Yayoi and absorbed the genes of the Jomon, the average Japanese has 20% Jomon DNA.
The indigenous people of South India who were isolated have large amounts of DNA from Ancestral South Asians, but the Indian populations mixed with the Iranian Farmers and the Indo-Iranians (a mixture of Iranian and Indo-European Farmers), these Indo-Iranians brought with them the Indo-European languages and Haplogroups R1a that are typical of Eastern Europe.
@@Deira854 They are Eastern Basals, the DNA of all Eastern Eurasians is derived from them. Its Haplogroup is D, the founding Haplogroup with C, its sister to E (Sub-Saharan African). The Basal DNA of the East led to the Ancestral South Asians and the Ancestral North Asians, which gave rise to the current populations of East and Southeast Asia.
@@Deira854 The Indigenous people of India are a mixture of 50% Eastern Basal with 50% Western Basal (ancestor of Western Eurasians such as Europeans or Arabs).
They don't have Austronesian DNA, these tests simply pick out which groups you share ancestry closest to. Getting Austronesian doesn't and you're Austronesian, it means you have genetic markers that match closest to Austronesian data.
21,1% "Filipino, Indonesians, and Malay" itu bukan terkhususkan pada DNA orang Austronesia. MyHeritage itu cuma men-simplifikasikan karakteristik DNA dari suatu wilayah dunia. Jadi yang "Filipino, Indonesians, and Malay" di sini bukan hanya menunjuk pada DNA Austronesia, tapi juga DNA Negrito. Sama seperti pas menunjukkan 57,2% "South Asian", bukan berarti mereka keturunan India, karena orang India sekarang itu aslinya orang Indo-Arya yang berasal dari Selatan Rusia/Asia Tengah dengan kultur Indo-Eropa, dan Dravida yang berasal dari sekitaran Iran dan Sungai Indus. Aslinya 57,2% "South Asian" itu merujuk pada suku bangsa yang lebih tua dari Indo-Arya dan Dravida, yang disebut sebagai AASI (Ancient Ancestral South Indian)
@@mitonaarea5856 Northern Asian and Jomon-related genetic structure in Three Kingdoms period (1700 years ago) Gimhae, Korea www.astronomer.rocks/news/photo/202206/90270_26021_1757.jpg Green color Jomon DNA.
@@tracyland479well jomon people turn out actually not only restricted in Japanese archipelago and actually range to Korean peninsula, lower Amur, kuril and Sakhalin island
They look like South Asian tribals, go search Paniya, bonds and Kadar tribes in India. You will see resemblance. Andamanese are directly related to Ancestral South Indians. This is why they so much Indian dna
@@NoDramaJustLove Human cognitive ability has not changed at all in the last 50,000 years. The changes have occurred due to culture and accumulation of knowledge.
@@RhkMhm-kf9xf Genetic evidence indicates that these tribes have come from South Asia and have remained isolated, without mixing for about 50,000 years. Its Haplogroups are very exotic and people from India do not possess it. The genetic similarity is due to the fact that ancient DNA has simply been better preserved in the Indian Subconscious compared to other regions of Eurasia.
@@RhkMhm-kf9xf No fool. The kader population in Kerala score closes to Andmanese, they are not South East Asians. The Andamanese are a cousin population AASI, all genetic papers say that. Why else they would be scoring 60% South Asian?
@@RhkMhm-kf9xf Lol does that even make sense?/They are not South Asians but are related to.AASI. if they are scoring 60%/South asian they are south asian
@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat it didnt anatolian farmers wasn't R they was mainly G T and j2 and E1b1b R in africa came from mesolithic Europe more than likely
@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat the mummies show no steppe ancestry they are mainly natufian + anatolian farmers and neolithic iran i told you R in central africa came from mesolithic europe whg like probably somthing like Villabruna cluster in italy and i just told you the anatolian farmers wasnt R they was mainly g or T and OTHER NEAR EASTERN CLADES like e1B1B and j2 the R you talking about is steppe and came later not in the neolithic its linked to the indo europeans
@@Deira854Again, they score South Asian, because Onge were taken as proxy, since there aren't any original AASI samples. South Asian today means a mixture of Neolithic Iranian Farmers with AASI with a bit of Steppe ancestry and, depending on the region, a bit of South East Asian ancestry as well - especially along the eastern coastal regions of India as well as Sri Lanka.
look at the video. They score 57% South Asian. Same as Indians. I always tell people that Andamanese populations are closes to South Asians, Because they are directly related to AASI of South Asia. Yet fools keep saying they are from somewhere else. They are in Bay of Bengal India afterall
Have you seen how some of the Indian tribal groups look? search Bonda tribe and Paniya tribes in India, even these tribes have mixed with Iranian farmers, but you can clearly see African features in them, The Andamanese are basically unmixed Indians@@josephinetracy1485
Not a bit of African wow I’m not surprised sometimes they get cut off during evolution looks like due climate change like a lot of cultures on that end of the map
I think it is austroasiatic, bengalese, munda instead of indian. India is not one nation. Bengalese people have genetic connection with agglutinative language speaking C3, C4, N, O3, P1, R1, R1a, R1b, R2 people whose ancestors are C2, K2 haplogroups. But, I got surprised as no tibetoburman.
look at the video. They score 57% South Asian. Same as Indians. I always tell people that Andamanese populations are closes to South Asians, Because they are directly related to AASI of South Asia. Yet fools keep saying they are from somewhere else. They are in Bay of Bengal India afterall
All Andaman tribes are closely related. They were one family living in different locations. They come from Africa . Rather they belonged to ANDAMANS. Reason being, Indian subcontinent was part of Africa broken away.
The Indian Subcontinent was never part of Africa, the Africans left and spread throughout Asia 60,000 years ago, from South Asia they spread and gave rise to the current Asians and Europeans. The Onge are known as Basal East Eurasian, their DNA is the basis of the Indigenous People of the Indian Subcontinent, from the Indian Subcontinent they spread to East Asia where the Ancestors of North Asia and South Asia separated, a group gave rise to Tibet and the other gave rise to the Mongols, Chinese or Japanese
@@user-jt3dw6vv4x they are a really old branch. But their looks imo are developed I think basal eurasians more or less looked more like australian aboriginals than the andamanese
@@fachospheriquemotors They are known as Australoid Races descendants of the first Homo Sapiens that arrived in East Asia, they can be found in an impure state in South Asia, Oceania and in a pure state in the Adaman Islands and Australia, there are four Negroid, Australoid, Mongoloid and Caucasoid, this Race is completely different from the Sub-Saharan Black Race so different that it has a completely different cranial structure, it is the progenitor of the Mongoloid races of East Asia and partly of the Indigenous of the Americas
Onge is fairly close to the 8 kya Laos Hoabinhian sample which is expected, however he's also quite close to the 40 kya Tianyuan sample from Northern China and the 33 kya Amur sample from the Amur region, this could only mean that Onge likely descend from prehistoric Northern Asians, hence supporting the northern migration route hypothesis.
No, it means that Onge still have more genetic affinity with the Tianyuan man and Hoabinhians. But doesn't means that Eastern Eurasians originated from the North.
@@Deira854 I never denied that the Andamanese have connections with AASI. However modern Indians especially North Indians are predominantly of West Eurasian descent, this is sth that you cannot deny either.
@@weifan9533lol you keep saying that. Just go search on net how much AASI ancestry Indians have it ranges from 20% lowest to 70% highest. Andamanese are closes to South Asians then anyone AASI is directly tied with them. This is Onge are scoring 57% south Asian.
Uyghurs are mixed people, they aren't East Asian by genetics, i mean fully. Andamanese blacks more related to Tibetans and Jomon people. Uyghurs have not D haplotype. more accurately R1b, R1a, J2, O2b, Q1a. Uyghurs relatives are Central Asians and some Caucasus people
@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat Andamanese are closer to Southeast Asian tribals of Malaysia and Thailand and tribals in parts of India than they are to Tibetans or Jomon people. Andamanese share the same paternal haplogroup with Tibetans and Ainu but that's not autosomal DNA. This video is about autosomal DNA not Y-DNA, which is something only males can have. It makes no sense to be talking about Y-DNA and relationships with other groups that carry the same haplogroup when it's only in reference to the male population. What about the females? If you look at maternal DNA, the Andamanese Onge women carry Haplogroup M31, a haplogroup that is correlated to South Asia and includes subclades found in various parts of India, Nepal and Myanmar. Haplogroup ≠ autosomal DNA.
They didn't, its important to emphasis that these people would have come from a people that no longer reside in Africa. Most Africans are Bantu which emerged recently from West Africa.
@fuwa9616 Bantu is a misappropriated word that means people or spirit. The way you are trying to use Bantu, denotes a language grouping. The people in that language grouping do not all share the same DNA. Bantu is neither a tribe, ethnicity, nor a DNA marker. You people use it as if it is a haplogroup within itself when it is absolutely not. Africa has the most genetic diversity and this is because of the actual Black Africans, the ones you keep trying to lump away as Bantus. And although the current adamanese people have never set foot in Africa l, clearly their ancestors left Africa to settle where they are now, so what is the problem?
These isolated populations always have the stunning results
If they retain ancient DNA and are often ancestors of completely different-looking human groups
Their closest genetic people are Ainu and Tibetans.
@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat Only in terms of haplogroup, but not really in terms of autosomal DNA
@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat No, their closet genetic populations are the Negritos and some South Asian population who score high AASI like the Paniyas, Ainus and Tibetians share with Andamanese the same Paternal lineage.
@@MrPaleolithic Yes
Can you share the results of Salar DNA? (A Turkic People Living China)
Their genetics same as Uyghurs.
just they have more East Asian Mtdna
@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat Nope they heavily mixed with chines today they resemble dungans and hui
@@barguttobed Salars live near to Uyghurs.
hui dungans live Northernmost side
@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat nope salars live in Quinghai not in Xinjang
@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat salar lives in Qinghai province which is far away from uighur~
They identified themselves as Hui, muslim ppl, in another word "Donggan" but not salar
Hey bro, do you have results for the Jarawa Andaman tribe? I can bet they will score even more South Asian because they are more isolated then Onge. I am assuming Jarawa will be some where between 60-70% South Asian. This component is directly related to Ancestral South Indian component in India/South Asia
الجيراوا اقدم من الهنود في جنوب اسيا
Wow really interesting one especially genetic closeness to such ancient samples as Tianyuan, Salkhit and Ust Ishim paleo Asian dna
Technically, they are basal East Eurasians.
They are closes to Indian AASI dna, this is why they score 57% south asian in Autosomal dna@@parisan9985
The reason why they're getting a bit of Japanese is because of the shared DNA with the Jomon people and the Japanese have a bit of the old Jomon ancestry.
Yeah it's the deep East Eurasian lineage that is shared between Andamanese, Jomon, Ancient Tibetans, AASI and Hoabinhians and also probably from carry over regarding their Y-DNA heritage.
Jomon came from Siberia what are you on
The average Japanese has 60% Yellow River Farmers (typical of East Asia) + 20% Amur River Farmers + 20% Hunter Gatherers of the Jomon culture. The DNA of the Japanese is very similar to the Koreans but without the Jomon admixture, the Jomon DNA is highly divergent from other modern Asian populations, they separated from the Ancient Northeast Asia 28,000 years ago.
@@culto779Korean have small jomon admixture. During jeulmun period, peninsula settled by people genetically similar with jomon
@@monsieurlemonthey mostly from south
Can you do video about genetic heritage of qizlbash warroirs(Safavid era 16 th century) or Tarakama people in azerbaijan?
@Hoor daily with Ayesha Karim Azerbaijani people also a Turkmen male+Iranic female in 11 th century
@Green98 nope
@@Kaban-ordusu azeri are Paternally Persins and Maternally other Iranic people with turkised language
@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat bla bla bla İ can't trust trolls in internet like you🤓🤓🤓🤓
Q, R1a, J2 haplogroups
In other words, the Onge are 100% East Eurasian (that South Asian ancestry is obviously picking up the AASI-related ancestry that the Andamanese have).
Yes. AASI were closly related to them
Can you do one on ancient assyrians
Arabs
@@ranro7371 Bijî Kurdistan
@@diyartatar5054burn Kurdistan to the ground. That land is Iraq. That land is turkey. That land is Syria. Go back to Iran. Iranic people.
Congratulations for reaching 1000 subs
Could you analyze Amur River Hunter Gatherers and more steppe people?
@@furkanarkan5903 he actually did (devil's gate)
Sensacional, uau!
Pode fazer um vídeo de um hebreu antigo? Um datando de aproximadamente 1300-1000 anos a.C.?
The 8,2% Japanese and Korean is showed by his Y dna D1a2b which is mostly distibuted in this areas
@Aldo Steinbach ur descended from the anatolian neolithic farmers or early neolithic farmers.. they originated from anatolia and they introduced farming or agriculture to europe and many regions like north africa and the caucasus, they were lightskinned, dark haired and eyed and they replaced the dark skinned blue eyed western hunter gatherers who lived all across europe (west, central and the balkans). They carried paternal haplogroup G2a and maternal haplogroup N and H (im not sure with the mtdna)..
they make up 50%-60% of southern european genome (autosomal) and 30%-40% of northern europeans genome (british isles, scandinavia, germany, poland) while they make 10%-20% of northeast europeans genome (balts, finns, russians), sardinians score the highest early european farmer component (80%-90%).
one of the most famous neolithic cultures in europe is the globural amphora, thisd culture originated in central europe (poland) they were 70% neolithic farmers and 30% WHG's they were lightskinned, brown haired with some dark blonde highlights and variable eyed (brown, blue), and the funnelbeakers (scandinavia, northern germany and holland) they were 60%-70% anatolian neolithic and 40%-30% scandinavian hunter gatherers (I GUESS) they adapted blonde and blue eyes genes from the SHG's.
.
I'm algerian berber from northeast algeria and i score 45% anatolian neolithic :)
@Hoor daily with Ayesha Karim north african genome is an admxiture of iberomaurisians and anatolian neolithic farmers, modern north africans are mostly olive, light skinned, dark haired and eyed, they're 25%-40% iberomaurisian and 30%-45% early european farmers.
early european farmers were lightskinned, dark haired and eyed and iberomaurisians were light brown skinned, dark haired and eyed and they were 70%-80% west eurasian derived and 30%-20% sub saharan african derived and taforalt sample from northdern morocco was 65% west eurasian derived and 35% sub saharan derived, u can see his facial reconstruction on ancestral whispers site.
look at the video. They score 57% South Asian. Same as Indians. I always tell people that Andamanese populations are closes to South Asians, Because they are directly related to AASI of South Asia. Yet fools keep saying they are from somewhere else
@@Deira854 Huh? You keep posting the same comment everywhere and it has no correlation to what the OP is speaking about.
This mtdna is very old and rare but it's subclades are everywhere
It's that the same in North Sentinel Island? Right?
I wonder how geneticists who got there did the DNA expertise on them😂
look at the video. They score 57% South Asian. Same as Indians. I always tell people that Andamanese populations are closes to South Asians, Because they are directly related to AASI of South Asia. Yet fools keep saying they are from somewhere else. They are in Bay of Bengal India afterall. I can bet Jarawa and North Sentinel will score even more south Asian if tested
@@barguttobedwell most andamese tribe are related to each other
I like how you change the music to the geographic area seen on the moving map.
The DNA is quite strange, they look completely Negritos, and the majority came from South Asia and East Asia.
But maniq Negrito in Thailand??
look at the video. They score 57% South Asian. Same as Indians. I always tell people that Andamanese populations are closes to South Asians, Because they are directly related to AASI of South Asia. Yet fools keep saying they are from somewhere else
At one point Indians looks like them 100% before Indians mixed with caucasians, these people carry the original Indian/South Asian dna, which most Indians also have still in large portions, but Indians mixed with Caucasians
@@Deira854 Yes, Indians mainly in the northern part are also very close to the Iranian peoples.
@@yagil777 Yes now but still carry AASI genes at 30%
Fascinating. An Onge related population once lived in India and formed one significant part of the Indian genetic makeup. This is why they are scoring high South Asian percentage 😊
Yes of course. Weird part is Im from Pakistan look Iranian, yet even I have close to 20-30% of their dna
The Onge of the Andaman Islands are considered to be Basal Eastern Eurasians, and are considered to be the ancestors of the AASI (India), Pacific and East Asians. The first anatomically modern individual in China was Tianyuan Man, 45,000 years old, who was genetically very similar to the current Onge and the Aeta of the Philippines. In the Pacific they became isolated and gave rise to the Melanesians and Papuans. In India the AASI mixed with Iranian farmers and Indoeuropeans from the Steppes to give rise to the current Indians.
@@Deira854Iranian Neolithic have 9% Onge like DNA, Caucasian Hunter Gatherers 4% Onge like, Indoeuropeans of the Steppes 5%, as modeled with the G25 calculator.
@@Deira854Pakistanis have an Autosomal DNA similar to the Harappan civilization (65% Iranian Neolithic plus 35% AASI), with the difference that modern Pakistanis have more Indowuropean DNA between 10% to 30% (depending on ethnicity), and retain 30% of AASI, the rest of the DNA is Iranian Neolithic.
Can someone explain what "using 1 populations approximation" means?❤️
It means that the sample is only compared to one sample, as opposed to mixing samples. The numbers after the @ are Euclidean distance. The smaller the number, the better the fit.
@@bossschmutzfink9865 Thank you!💌
Am interested in this but the music is much too loud to continue watching
Cool! Despite East Asian no Chinese/Vietnamese. Interesting.
look at the video. They score 57% South Asian. Same as Indians. I always tell people that Andamanese populations are closes to South Asians, Because they are directly related to AASI of South Asia. Yet fools keep saying they are from somewhere else. They are in Bay of Bengal India afterall
they are related to the Australian Aborigines, Malay and Filipino Negritos. The Onge dont have Denisovan dna but the Aetas of the Philippines do.
Maniq Negrito in Thailand
They do have Denisovan ancestry.
look at the video. They score 57% South Asian. Same as Indians. I always tell people that Andamanese populations are closes to South Asians, Because they are directly related to AASI of South Asia. Yet fools keep saying they are from somewhere else. They are in Bay of Bengal India afterall
Aasi is kinda related with hohanbhian who later become Malaysian negrito. Filipino negrito are distantly related with them and more related with papuan and Australian aborigines.
@@MrPaleolithicthe Andamamese islanders do not have denisovan DNA 🧬 .
Can you do the Ilirian or Dardanian dna because it is very controversial
This why the idea of "race" is a fallacy. Ive been posting about Andaman Islanders for over a decade on how their markers changed after leaving the African continent over 50,000 years and isolation. They maintained their black skin but their genetics altered into the environment they settled along with possible genetic drift.
No they're not Africans
@@Yow531 just because you have similar skin doesn't make you the same. They left the continent maybe 50,000 years ago and their genetics changed but their skin remained very black.
@@Yow531never said that they were African but they left the African continent over 50,000 years ago.
They are closes to Indians, look at the video, they score 57% south asian/Indian. They are located in Bay of Bengal India after all@@Yow531
@@osiruskat All humans left Africa. The Andamese Onge developed from a lineage that diverged from the early East Eurasians when they reached India.
So, they are counsins of Japanese and Tibetans?
That's right, but their genetic relationship is very old. The Onge are Eastern Basals, this population arrived from the Arabian Peninsula 60,000 years ago, and was isolated on the island. On the continent the Basals were differentiated into Ancestral South Asians and Ancestral North Asians, the Ancestral North Asia gave rise to the South Asians such as the Tibetans, East Asians such as the Mongols or the Chinese, a population of Northern Ancestors emigrated to Japan thousands of years before the typical East Asians emerged, this population gave rise to the Jomon, later from Korea they arrived the Yayoi and absorbed the genes of the Jomon, the average Japanese has 20% Jomon DNA.
The indigenous people of South India who were isolated have large amounts of DNA from Ancestral South Asians, but the Indian populations mixed with the Iranian Farmers and the Indo-Iranians (a mixture of Iranian and Indo-European Farmers), these Indo-Iranians brought with them the Indo-European languages and Haplogroups R1a that are typical of Eastern Europe.
They are related to South Asians Indians the most, you didn't even see the video
@@Deira854 They are Eastern Basals, the DNA of all Eastern Eurasians is derived from them. Its Haplogroup is D, the founding Haplogroup with C, its sister to E (Sub-Saharan African). The Basal DNA of the East led to the Ancestral South Asians and the Ancestral North Asians, which gave rise to the current populations of East and Southeast Asia.
@@Deira854 The Indigenous people of India are a mixture of 50% Eastern Basal with 50% Western Basal (ancestor of Western Eurasians such as Europeans or Arabs).
I just found out that they also have astronesian DNA, Andaman people can be great sailors
They are closes to Indians/South asians
They don't have
They don't have Austronesian DNA, these tests simply pick out which groups you share ancestry closest to. Getting Austronesian doesn't and you're Austronesian, it means you have genetic markers that match closest to Austronesian data.
They are closes to Indians@@user-jt3dw6vv4x
21,1% "Filipino, Indonesians, and Malay" itu bukan terkhususkan pada DNA orang Austronesia. MyHeritage itu cuma men-simplifikasikan karakteristik DNA dari suatu wilayah dunia. Jadi yang "Filipino, Indonesians, and Malay" di sini bukan hanya menunjuk pada DNA Austronesia, tapi juga DNA Negrito. Sama seperti pas menunjukkan 57,2% "South Asian", bukan berarti mereka keturunan India, karena orang India sekarang itu aslinya orang Indo-Arya yang berasal dari Selatan Rusia/Asia Tengah dengan kultur Indo-Eropa, dan Dravida yang berasal dari sekitaran Iran dan Sungai Indus. Aslinya 57,2% "South Asian" itu merujuk pada suku bangsa yang lebih tua dari Indo-Arya dan Dravida, yang disebut sebagai AASI (Ancient Ancestral South Indian)
hello can you pls tell why onges are afraid of darkness
So no y dna K at all?
8.2% my Korean brother from the Mars to the Earth ✌️
that 8.2% is associated with the Jomon people not koreans..
@@tracyland479 Koreans also have some Jomon dna tho. I think it is about 5%.
@@mitonaarea5856
Northern Asian and Jomon-related genetic structure in Three Kingdoms period (1700 years ago) Gimhae, Korea
www.astronomer.rocks/news/photo/202206/90270_26021_1757.jpg
Green color Jomon DNA.
@@tracyland479well jomon people turn out actually not only restricted in Japanese archipelago and actually range to Korean peninsula, lower Amur, kuril and Sakhalin island
crazy how they look nothing like Modern South Asians but half their DNA is looks basically south Asian
They look like South Asian tribals, go search Paniya, bonds and Kadar tribes in India. You will see resemblance. Andamanese are directly related to Ancestral South Indians. This is why they so much Indian dna
@@NoDramaJustLove Human cognitive ability has not changed at all in the last 50,000 years. The changes have occurred due to culture and accumulation of knowledge.
@@RhkMhm-kf9xf Genetic evidence indicates that these tribes have come from South Asia and have remained isolated, without mixing for about 50,000 years. Its Haplogroups are very exotic and people from India do not possess it. The genetic similarity is due to the fact that ancient DNA has simply been better preserved in the Indian Subconscious compared to other regions of Eurasia.
@@RhkMhm-kf9xf No fool. The kader population in Kerala score closes to Andmanese, they are not South East Asians. The Andamanese are a cousin population AASI, all genetic papers say that. Why else they would be scoring 60% South Asian?
@@RhkMhm-kf9xf Lol does that even make sense?/They are not South Asians but are related to.AASI. if they are scoring 60%/South asian they are south asian
The Africans with R1b are interesting.
yeah fulani and woodabe peoples results would be so awesome, i want to see their g25 vahaduo neolithic component
R1b migrated from Anatolia to Egypt and then went to Chad.
You can see even some Egypt Mummies got R1b.
they married black woman
@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat it didnt anatolian farmers wasn't R they was mainly G T and j2 and E1b1b
R in africa came from mesolithic Europe more than likely
@@chakir348 You crazy?
R1b moved around Armenia to some parts of Turkey and went to Egypt then to Chad.
look haplotype migration.
@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat the mummies show no steppe ancestry they are mainly natufian + anatolian farmers and neolithic iran i told you R in central africa came from mesolithic europe whg like probably somthing like Villabruna cluster in italy
and i just told you the anatolian farmers wasnt R they was mainly g or T and OTHER NEAR EASTERN CLADES like e1B1B and j2
the R you talking about is steppe and came later not in the neolithic its linked to the indo europeans
Nice results! I once read that Andamanese people are a mixture of Basal East-Eurasians and AASI's inhabiting these small Islands.
They are much closer to AASI. This why they are scoring 57% South Asian
@@Deira854Again, they score South Asian, because Onge were taken as proxy, since there aren't any original AASI samples. South Asian today means a mixture of Neolithic Iranian Farmers with AASI with a bit of Steppe ancestry and, depending on the region, a bit of South East Asian ancestry as well - especially along the eastern coastal regions of India as well as Sri Lanka.
Aasi are group of basal east Eurasian
No @@mimorisenpai8540
@@SugiSeufz what you mean there aren't any AASI ?
Very nice results 👍👌 I thought it would have a lot more Papuan/Melanesian and much less South Asian withour any East Asian dna. Regards
If they are about 87% of an Asian mix (Indian, Japanese, Filipino), they look nothing like those people. They look like Angolans!
look at the video. They score 57% South Asian. Same as Indians. I always tell people that Andamanese populations are closes to South Asians, Because they are directly related to AASI of South Asia. Yet fools keep saying they are from somewhere else. They are in Bay of Bengal India afterall
Have you seen how some of the Indian tribal groups look? search Bonda tribe and Paniya tribes in India, even these tribes have mixed with Iranian farmers, but you can clearly see African features in them, The Andamanese are basically unmixed Indians@@josephinetracy1485
@@Deira854 Dark skinned south Asians are not Negroid. Different skulls, different features.
@@Deira854 Yes you are right.
Plz Metei Pangal
Ancient paternal haplogroup DE....
Samaritans if u could do about them
Not a bit of African wow I’m not surprised sometimes they get cut off during evolution looks like due climate change like a lot of cultures on that end of the map
they are negritos
I think it is austroasiatic, bengalese, munda instead of indian. India is not one nation. Bengalese people have genetic connection with agglutinative language speaking C3, C4, N, O3, P1, R1, R1a, R1b, R2 people whose ancestors are C2, K2 haplogroups. But, I got surprised as no tibetoburman.
look at the video. They score 57% South Asian. Same as Indians. I always tell people that Andamanese populations are closes to South Asians, Because they are directly related to AASI of South Asia. Yet fools keep saying they are from somewhere else. They are in Bay of Bengal India afterall
@@Deira854 Andamese are natives to India. Probably they think of Tamils,Aryans much more.
All Andaman tribes are closely related. They were one family living in different locations. They come from Africa . Rather they belonged to ANDAMANS. Reason being, Indian subcontinent was part of Africa broken away.
The Indian Subcontinent broke away from Africa along with South America Millions of years ago. Humans weren't even a thing when that happened.
The Indian Subcontinent was never part of Africa, the Africans left and spread throughout Asia 60,000 years ago, from South Asia they spread and gave rise to the current Asians and Europeans. The Onge are known as Basal East Eurasian, their DNA is the basis of the Indigenous People of the Indian Subcontinent, from the Indian Subcontinent they spread to East Asia where the Ancestors of North Asia and South Asia separated, a group gave rise to Tibet and the other gave rise to the Mongols, Chinese or Japanese
@@user-yt3xd2jl6d are you serious
Tibetans and Japanese relatives
Say wallah?
Aren't they your cousins?
Haplogroup C and D...the most oldest genes
@@뽀뽀함하자잉 I'm R1a Z93🤨
@@뽀뽀함하자잉 They are not my cousins, only Native Americans are cousins.
@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat I don’t think that native Americans your cousins
It is interesting that they are very very genetically close to Upper Paleolithic Eurasian samples like Ust Ishim and Tianyuan man.
They descend partially from an East Eurasian lineage that is closer to these samples on the East Eurasian phylogenetic tree., that's why.
@@user-jt3dw6vv4x they are a really old branch. But their looks imo are developed I think basal eurasians more or less looked more like australian aboriginals than the andamanese
Nice music bro
Where is african DNA ??
Ironically enough, they are the group genetically furthest removed from Africans.
@@bossschmutzfink9865 Really? I can't believe it
@@fachospheriquemotors They are known as Australoid Races descendants of the first Homo Sapiens that arrived in East Asia, they can be found in an impure state in South Asia, Oceania and in a pure state in the Adaman Islands and Australia, there are four Negroid, Australoid, Mongoloid and Caucasoid, this Race is completely different from the Sub-Saharan Black Race so different that it has a completely different cranial structure, it is the progenitor of the Mongoloid races of East Asia and partly of the Indigenous of the Americas
@@fachospheriquemotors Mitochondrial DNA is rare but its subclades are spreading across much of Asia
They have no connection to modern day Africans.
Onge is fairly close to the 8 kya Laos Hoabinhian sample which is expected, however he's also quite close to the 40 kya Tianyuan sample from Northern China and the 33 kya Amur sample from the Amur region, this could only mean that Onge likely descend from prehistoric Northern Asians, hence supporting the northern migration route hypothesis.
No, it means that Onge still have more genetic affinity with the Tianyuan man and Hoabinhians. But doesn't means that Eastern Eurasians originated from the North.
They score 57% south Asian here clearly showing their ties to India
@@Deira854 I never denied that the Andamanese have connections with AASI. However modern Indians especially North Indians are predominantly of West Eurasian descent, this is sth that you cannot deny either.
@@weifan9533lol you keep saying that. Just go search on net how much AASI ancestry Indians have it ranges from 20% lowest to 70% highest. Andamanese are closes to South Asians then anyone AASI is directly tied with them. This is Onge are scoring 57% south Asian.
@@weifan9533east Eurasian originated from South
south asian hunter gatherers, Andamanese, Southeast asian Negritos were related peoples
Yap positive..just like Haplogroup E.
%50 satya %50 indian
@Hoor daily with Ayesha Karim kiddo gayzal isnt safe in india
@Hoor daily with Ayesha Karim and gayzal mother isn't safe in kashmiri
@Hoor daily with Ayesha Karim your mother vs with pakistani
Wtf you mean by satya 🐄💩🇮🇳
My head is spinning
Why? because they are Indian/South asian related the most? in fact if you are Pathan/AFghan, even you have their genes are around 10-15% on average
Impressionante. Então o que explicaria eles serem fenotipicamente negros.? Terem cabelo crespos e pele escura.
THATS ALOT OF ASIAN IN THEM TO BE SO DARK BIT THATS LIT!
You mean Indian
smh, these islanders are the original ppl, others came from them
@@roséiswine8294 Yes Indians got their genetics and dark skin from them
they are the original ppl. All others came from them except yt's
Two sample oracles %20 uygurs 🤣or hazara ör uzbek. They are our black brothers. Salute to all humankind
bro..
Uyghurs are mixed people, they aren't East Asian by genetics, i mean fully.
Andamanese blacks more related to Tibetans and Jomon people.
Uyghurs have not D haplotype.
more accurately R1b, R1a, J2, O2b, Q1a.
Uyghurs relatives are Central Asians and some Caucasus people
These people are most related to Indians even according to this video 57%, not sure what other people you are talking about
@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat Andamanese are closer to Southeast Asian tribals of Malaysia and Thailand and tribals in parts of India than they are to Tibetans or Jomon people. Andamanese share the same paternal haplogroup with Tibetans and Ainu but that's not autosomal DNA. This video is about autosomal DNA not Y-DNA, which is something only males can have. It makes no sense to be talking about Y-DNA and relationships with other groups that carry the same haplogroup when it's only in reference to the male population. What about the females? If you look at maternal DNA, the Andamanese Onge women carry Haplogroup M31, a haplogroup that is correlated to South Asia and includes subclades found in various parts of India, Nepal and Myanmar. Haplogroup ≠ autosomal DNA.
@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisboratUyghur and Uzbek is still half east Eurasian make them have comparable relateness with onge like them with Indian.
g25 vahaduo
They came from africa.....
They didn't, its important to emphasis that these people would have come from a people that no longer reside in Africa. Most Africans are Bantu which emerged recently from West Africa.
@fuwa9616 Bantu is a misappropriated word that means people or spirit. The way you are trying to use Bantu, denotes a language grouping. The people in that language grouping do not all share the same DNA. Bantu is neither a tribe, ethnicity, nor a DNA marker. You people use it as if it is a haplogroup within itself when it is absolutely not. Africa has the most genetic diversity and this is because of the actual Black Africans, the ones you keep trying to lump away as Bantus. And although the current adamanese people have never set foot in Africa l, clearly their ancestors left Africa to settle where they are now, so what is the problem?
Turkic
Turkic what?
@@barguttobed everything
Absolutely correct.
Correct
Это юмор такой?
Chad eye area
Karaboga cofirmed