Carolyn Bertozzi has explained so very, very well because her presentation showed every detail that is necesary to see...was really good....thank so much for this contribution.
@@MindlessTube Nobody should do that, because there are so many cancer patients suffering out there. I think immunotherapy is the answer to eradicate cancer. I hope scientists will concentrate on that...🙏
It’s my 22 bday, and I was watching her noble ceremony video and as a birthday surprise I got to learn about this Sugar Coating this easily. Thank You 🙏
But I still have an issue in understanding that how the drugs that destroy sugar coating on cells would be able to differentiate between healthy and cancerous cells. I think there needs to be further research on this topic but this is a great discovery I believe and is going to be really important in finding the ultimate cure.
Unfortunately, cancer cells, during the acquisition of the malignant fenotype, can develop an important adaptation, hiding themselves from the immune system. The can, for example, mask or change specific glucidic groups from the outer layer of the plasme membrane.
Congratulations for the Nobel ! We rarely remember the role of institutions when we win some kind of accolade, so, please don't forget the role of Stanford in your journey towards the Nobel .
1) So far, and another very impressive study, finding, and presentation on the symptoms, the surfaces of many problems, the cancer. Nevertheless, still remain lacking for much more deeper and indeph exploration and understand into the original cause of all cancer cells and all other chronicle sickness issues. 2) And so, all the excitement of treatments on the surfaces are continueing; to buy more times, not dealing with the original cause of the problems. 3) What do we really have to celebrate about, of getting to live few more months longer, in what physical and mental condition, and to do what within this short period of times? 4) When would be the best and right time to attack those pervasive hidden original causes that leading to all sicknesses, cancers, sadness, and deaths? Alexander, Esoteric ChiKong Healer.
this is really fascinating, how about the reverse? treating autoimunne diseases when healthy cells are being targeted? I guess it probably has to do with the sugar problem as well this is so interesting
If the Sialic acid does not come from the sugar that we consume , is there a way to dicrease it's amount by our own actions and life style ? Or is it just medication that can achieve it ?
I've heard that if you consume Aloe you up your amount of the sugar mannose which helps cells communicate (as it's one of the surface sugars) and therefore facilitates the healing process. Is that true?
I wonder if there are proteins found in nature which strip Sialic Acid from cancers, or if this process must be targeted with modifiers such as CRISPR-CAS9? She didn't quite go into detail about how these drugs work.
It's too bad they couldn't figure out what people are eating like sugary foods that causes these problems instead of finding a drug that so-called fixes the problem but then the drug companies wouldn't make any money so that's no good.
Johnny it's all about your immune system you eat garbage and don't exercise on a regular basis like most people you will need these drugs but if you are smart and educated not from the mainstream media Or like most wild animals you won't need to use drugs
It's not like the glycoproteins embedded in the plasma membrane are just synthesised as a result of consuming sugar. These are produced in complected biosynthetic pathways involving the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi body inside cells. Also the process requires amino acids to produce the glycoproteins but it's not like by eating protein bars you are going to get cancer. I think maybe you are getting slightly confused about what is a risk factor and what are the actual mechanisms that cause it. But it is widely known what lifestyle choices reduce chances of cancer such as not smoking or staying at a healthy weight.
One way I could think is maybe to lower the amount of Sialic Acid we have in our bodies so that our immune cells can unleash their wrath on the cancer cells. I'm just throwing things out there I'm no scientist but I feel like this is just a few steps away from a cure :)
But the normal cells will be naked as well...unless that doesn't matter and immune system has another way to differentiate between normal and cancer cells
The non cancer cells have cialic acid as well how does this therapy only target the cancer cells which have a lot of cialic acid? Won't you be stripping the cialic acid from the health cells as well?
I think she said cancer cells have more sialic acid than the healthy cells. Therefore we have to find a way by developing drugs so immune cells should be able to detect it and eat the cancer cells..
The problem with that is that sialic acid isn't enough for an immune cell to leave a cell alone. The only reason it happens in the cancer example is because the cancer cell was already yours, a cell that was completely fine before it went cancerous. Because there are dozens, if not hundreds, of different molecules just on the cell surface - there is a large difference between individuals. That's why sialic acid just doesn't cut it
Working with percentages like that in biology is pretty tough and, I really couldn't tell you because I didn't specifically study immunology too much, BUT, my take on it is that having just more sialic acid still wouldn't be enough. White blood cells constantly actively look for signs of invasion/signs of self, and sialic acid isn't even close to being the only self-recognition molecule, there are many more, especially those that are more diverse between human individuals. Again, not my field of research, but that explanation makes sense to me
That means a krto diet + intermittent fasting will help to cure cancer as they eliminate most of the sugars as energy and and then you won't eat sugar ( as you are on keto ) + take medicines + exercise more to increase the chances of living
At least have some logic. If you read some cancer definitions you understand is an effect of something that nobody knows for real. Some tell you viruses, some mutation or genetic error while duplicating, etc. In this explanation cancer cell is acting selfish and deceving our inmmune system just like a virus but to kill you by "excess of life". So what can we do to mantain sialic acid low or being use to deceive innmune system and prevent cancer? You have test to determine the levels of free sialic acid in urine. In Finland and Swedeen is common because the Salla desease.
Because this dumbing-down is not necessary. The coating does not try to tell you anything, by definition it can not. You do not need to ensoul things to explain them; we are not in kindergarten any more.
Alaa Al she in particular is working on getting rid of the salic acid on the cancer cells, since they are to blame for the immune cells not recognizing wether the cell is bad or not. You can sort of compare the salid acid to a “drug” that puts the function of the immune cell “to sleep” an to not suspect anything. That is the problem with the salic acid, it hides the fact that the cell is a cancer cell
The wonders of life and the universe are mere reflections of microscopic particles engaged in a pointless dance fully choreographed by the laws of physics.
This assumes that cancer only needs a cure, and not prevention. That cancer is not caused by the way we eat and live, and that you're simply unlucky to get it. While my heart goes out to all people with cancer and their families and friends, it's just that I've seen this so many times- that a new treatment has come out, but people still die from it, like my cousin. I don't think it's enough to find a cure for cancer, there needs to be a concerted effort to prevent it, as well. GO VEGAN!!! Great talk, though, and good luck with making new medicines, Carolyn!☺
I've been thinking about how to respond to your response, and I really don't know how to say this without sounding like an a$$hole, so please forgive me in advance. First off, I acknowledge your good intentions; that you too want to see a cancer- free world like myself and will support whatever efforts being made to realize that. If anything, this has nothing to do with you - we're arguing about someone else's opinion - but I just felt that I needed to put this out there. It would be good for people with cancer to take their medicine and such and if some medicine is better than another in some significant way, great. It seems weird to be against that. And up to that extent, I'm ok with it. I was just trying to say that even if the best cancer cures were invented and made available to the public, if people keep living the way that they do, they'll just keep on getting cancer and while cures for whatever cancer they get will be available, I don't find it to be such an elegant answer to keep swallowing pills to solve problems that we create by eating the way we do. A more holistic answer, a preventative one rather than a curative one, would not only provide a solution to the problem, but also free up these scientists to use their brilliant brains to solve other problems. I don't know if this comment makes any sense, really, I just felt the need to leave this here for people with cancer or their families. There are alternative medicine clinics in places like South America that cure cancer without subjecting people to tons of radiation that will kill them eventually. My cousin had stomach cancer. He contracted it about 10 years ago and went on medication. It worked the first time and successfully went into remission. But 2 years ago, it came back and took him in a year flat. I've always been troubled by it, because by the end of it all, it wasn't the cancer that killed him, it was the chemotherapy. Long story short, he didn't have a stomach at the end of his life, just lumps of charred organic matter. That's what the chemo did to him. He didn't eat at anything during his last months on this Earth. He went from 200 to 45 pounds in a matter of weeks. And it was painful to see him like that. He didn't smoke or drink and would even regularly do exercise, riding his bike to work and with his cycling group. But still, he got cancer. It's not enough to just watch out for the really extreme stuff, even the more normal, traditional foods cooked with modern methods are still just as dangerous. For anyone else who will read this comment, please watch what you eat. Health and fitness are not the same thing, and attractiveness is even further out on the scale. I don't know much, but being vegan is one of our best bets in these modern times.
They also tend to be the longest surviving people on the planet. They also tend to be really whiny online, like myself. Or really sensitive to a lot of issues that they may not need to be sensitive about. Look, I'm not trying to say that there is no chance of getting cancer on a vegan diet, that it is perfect or anything, or that the people practicing it are perfect, but that since we have to eat food to survive and what we eat has a bearing on how prone we are to getting diseases, including but not limited to cancer, then eating better is more ideal than eating worse. It's just a lot better to be steeped in a regimen that cuts out a lot of the probability of getting cancer. That's why I'm saying being vegan would be a step in the right direction, or majorly plant based, if that's too hard for some. And that such should take precedence over finding a cure that will eventually be sold to people for a profit. She must have the best of intentions in doing this, but I'm just asking how it is that people can cure themselves of cancer without such medicines. That to me proves that it is much less important to sell the idea that the cure is yet to be found, than to change the way we live. While it is important to practice science, that science should be viewed in a less reductionist manner. A more holistic approach, one that touches on the changes that don't cost an arm and a leg would be better suited.
I think (non-expert) the body might do that. Based on her description and vague recollection of high school physiology, it sounds like the body will turn O blood (universal donor) to A, B, or AB (universal recipient) blood. So in principle, we could turn A, B, AB blood into O blood and give it to anyone.
IsYitzach That's not how it works. O-type blood is simply not recognised as foreign. It performs all the normal functions of blood, and then dies, and the body replaces it with it's own cells. Hence why blood transfusions often have to be continuous (every day or week, et cetera)
If I have a misconception, I don't think you answered it. Blood transfusion for acute cases (car accident, surgery) should be one done, blood transfusion replaces loss, blood transfusion dies, but that's alright, body has it. Chronic blood loss (chronic iron deficiency, anaemia) blood transfusion is repeated as stated. But that wasn't the question. The question was, can you turn one blood type into another. The answer is: I don't know, but it smells like something the body can do, but I don't know if it a thing it actually does.
IsYitzach I just told you it does not. O-type is O-type. It stays that way. You can detect O-type in a transfusion recipient's blood until all the erythrocytes die off.
a body cannot change its blood type. if a person has blood type O, the immune system during their early stages has already recognized O type as self. O blood type doesn't have any antigen so any other blood type (A, B, AB ) will be recognized as foreign (since they have antigen) and attack the other blood types which can be fatal. Then you have the Rh factor which is again very specific and body just cannot alter that.
Interesting talk but frustratingly patronising. Why say 'sugar' when in reality these carbohydrates bonded to trans memb. prot.s are actually glycoproteins? Why say 'taste' when she could explain the very basic concept of the lock and key hypothesis which is simple enough? It's not like the audience are idiots you could at least use words that are aimed at people above primary school age.
Carolyn Bertozzi has explained so very, very well because her presentation showed every detail that is necesary to see...was really good....thank so much for this contribution.
Another fascinating and potentially very impactful discovery. Great job!
heck yeah!
That will be swept under the rug like many patent drugs.
@@MindlessTube Nobody should do that, because there are so many cancer patients suffering out there.
I think immunotherapy is the answer to eradicate cancer.
I hope scientists will concentrate on that...🙏
And she is now - winning a Nobel Prize in Chemistry!
It’s my 22 bday, and I was watching her noble ceremony video and as a birthday surprise I got to learn about this Sugar Coating this easily. Thank You 🙏
Explayned soo well! Awesome job ti Carolyn Bertozzi
Thankyou for your work. What fantastic results. Think of the people you will have helped save in the years to come.
Congrats for the Nobel prize 🏆
don't waste your time by scrolling down
That's hilarious
And the lady got a Nobel Prize five years later❤️
She truly deserves it.
Even a lay person can understand her.
Good talk. Very informative. Beautifully explained.
She's a really good speaker, well done Mrs. Bertozzi
But I still have an issue in understanding that how the drugs that destroy sugar coating on cells would be able to differentiate between healthy and cancerous cells. I think there needs to be further research on this topic but this is a great discovery I believe and is going to be really important in finding the ultimate cure.
I think the sugar coating on the cancer cell is different..
it is very interesting to know more about this
Brilliant research and presentation!
I had many abstacles in my life ,but didn't giving up and work hard every time and I succeded in the end
Good luck wish you will succeed and find the cure as quick as possible
Unfortunately, cancer cells, during the acquisition of the malignant fenotype, can develop an important adaptation, hiding themselves from the immune system. The can, for example, mask or change specific glucidic groups from the outer layer of the plasme membrane.
Congratulations for the Nobel ! We rarely remember the role of institutions when we win some kind of accolade, so, please don't forget the role of Stanford in your journey towards the Nobel .
1) So far, and another very impressive study, finding, and presentation on the symptoms, the surfaces of many problems, the cancer. Nevertheless, still remain lacking for much more deeper and indeph exploration and understand into the original cause of all cancer cells and all other chronicle sickness issues.
2) And so, all the excitement of treatments on the surfaces are continueing; to buy more times, not dealing with the original cause of the problems.
3) What do we really have to celebrate about, of getting to live few more months longer, in what physical and mental condition, and to do what within this short period of times?
4) When would be the best and right time to attack those pervasive hidden original causes that leading to all sicknesses, cancers, sadness, and deaths?
Alexander, Esoteric ChiKong Healer.
We know what causes cancer. The problem is that there’s no way to completely prevent it due to randomness.
this is really fascinating, how about the reverse? treating autoimunne diseases when healthy cells are being targeted?
I guess it probably has to do with the sugar problem as well
this is so interesting
This is such a good discovery .
That one was a really good talk, congrats
the suger we eat is related to this one she mentioned or not? She didn't tell us what we could do
Good talk with real results.
Well done Carolyn Bertozzi, Nobel laureate
This is an amazing study, hopefully they could use similar methods to target and cure HIV.
Awesome presentation! :D
If the Sialic acid does not come from the sugar that we consume , is there a way to dicrease it's amount by our own actions and life style ? Or is it just medication that can achieve it ?
Let me cut out the sugar from my diet and add some organic cocaine 💪!
I really hope you get success in your discovers. Congratulations!!!
I've heard that if you consume Aloe you up your amount of the sugar mannose which helps cells communicate (as it's one of the surface sugars) and therefore facilitates the healing process. Is that true?
Is there a possibility that the drug will remove sialic acid from healthy cells as well? What would be result if that happens?
Likely something along the lines of Cytokine Storm.
good video with a very interested information
How impressive!!!
very informative lecture.
My kind of lecture.
Very interesting, thank you :)
I wonder if there are proteins found in nature which strip Sialic Acid from cancers, or if this process must be targeted with modifiers such as CRISPR-CAS9? She didn't quite go into detail about how these drugs work.
Can someone slap some sialic acid on my pancreas so my immune system would stop giving me diabetes, that'd be great, thanks.
Kyle Neithamer start eating a whole food plant based diet. You are welcome.
oh dang medicine is an information technology now
every person ever
Here comes biotechnology.
It's too bad they couldn't figure out what people are eating like sugary foods that causes these problems instead of finding a drug that so-called fixes the problem but then the drug companies wouldn't make any money so that's no good.
you didn't get anything out of this video did you? Those sugar structures have nothing to do with the sugar you eat.
Johnny it's all about your immune system you eat garbage and don't exercise on a regular basis like most people you will need these drugs but if you are smart and educated not from the mainstream media Or like most wild animals you won't need to use drugs
See my three links above.
It's not like the glycoproteins embedded in the plasma membrane are just synthesised as a result of consuming sugar. These are produced in complected biosynthetic pathways involving the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi body inside cells. Also the process requires amino acids to produce the glycoproteins but it's not like by eating protein bars you are going to get cancer.
I think maybe you are getting slightly confused about what is a risk factor and what are the actual mechanisms that cause it. But it is widely known what lifestyle choices reduce chances of cancer such as not smoking or staying at a healthy weight.
@@robertblaisdell1086 it's very much to do with your immune system
Is this related to diet in any way? Does the consumption of sugar have any role in increasing the coating of sugar on our cells?
No, completely different type of sugar.
@@Ruuubick I think they should not use the word 'sugar' then...
It can be misleading to the lay person...
How do the drugs target the cancer cells though?
One way I could think is maybe to lower the amount of Sialic Acid we have in our bodies so that our immune cells can unleash their wrath on the cancer cells. I'm just throwing things out there I'm no scientist but I feel like this is just a few steps away from a cure :)
But the normal cells will be naked as well...unless that doesn't matter and immune system has another way to differentiate between normal and cancer cells
TheBigHadron drugs, that are existing, for example, could be GMO immune cells that look for specifically cancer cells.
only way to find out is to test I guess @TheBigHadron
Simple, The drugs look for the cells with miniature fidget spinners.
How do we control Sialic Acid?
Does that apply to all sorts of cancer?
good
Grate discover👍
Buenas tardes sería posible poner subtítulos a todos los videos
Hay un sitio, se llama Amara, que utilizan para poner subtítulos pero todas las contribuciones son de voluntarios.
How the molecules, she designed leave the healthy cell with sialic acid and only focus on cancerous cells ?
Take a shot every time she says "sugar"
Wouldn't removing the sialic acid from the cells compromise the cells' physiologic function?
If they’re already cancerous, that’s not an issue. As for normal cells... yeah, that might happen.
Congratulation!!! Form 2022
Explained like it was a message to happy golden retrievers
And why don't we think there are ill effects to stripping sialic acid from all of our cells? Is there any data on this?
Good question.
I also would like to know the answer...
The non cancer cells have cialic acid as well how does this therapy only target the cancer cells which have a lot of cialic acid? Won't you be stripping the cialic acid from the health cells as well?
I think she said cancer cells have more sialic acid than the healthy cells.
Therefore we have to find a way by developing drugs so immune cells should be able to detect it and eat the cancer cells..
I was hoping for some lifestyle or demographic indicators for when cancer has extra sialic whatever she called it.
if we added sialic acid to an organ's cells before transplant, could we prevent organ rejection?
.
Based on her talk, you would have to maintain the added sialic acid as the immune system is an ongoing thing.
how do our cells and the cancer cell maintain the sialic acid on their surface?
The problem with that is that sialic acid isn't enough for an immune cell to leave a cell alone. The only reason it happens in the cancer example is because the cancer cell was already yours, a cell that was completely fine before it went cancerous.
Because there are dozens, if not hundreds, of different molecules just on the cell surface - there is a large difference between individuals. That's why sialic acid just doesn't cut it
FlySpleen
good point.
what if the organ was a 90% match?
Working with percentages like that in biology is pretty tough and, I really couldn't tell you because I didn't specifically study immunology too much,
BUT, my take on it is that having just more sialic acid still wouldn't be enough. White blood cells constantly actively look for signs of invasion/signs of self, and sialic acid isn't even close to being the only self-recognition molecule, there are many more, especially those that are more diverse between human individuals.
Again, not my field of research, but that explanation makes sense to me
Drink a shot every time she refers to sugar on the surface of our cells!
(warning: you'll get drunk)
But that will ad sugar to our cell surfaces.
cool vid
Is there correlation between cialic acid on cells and nutrition?
Interesting.
That means a krto diet + intermittent fasting will help to cure cancer as they eliminate most of the sugars as energy and and then you won't eat sugar ( as you are on keto ) + take medicines + exercise more to increase the chances of living
Misleading title... good presentation skills but she doesn’t tell us what we can do. She tells only about her company
What if you have a kidney-transplant and have to take immune suppression meds?
I like how she explains it in a very simple way. SIALIC ACID IS OUR DOOM
Sialic acid is found in our bodies naturally. What the cancer cells are doing is that it's using that to their advantage to get past the immune cells.
Hello
CELLS or blood cells are coated with sugar?
At least have some logic. If you read some cancer definitions you understand is an effect of something that nobody knows for real. Some tell you viruses, some mutation or genetic error while duplicating, etc. In this explanation cancer cell is acting selfish and deceving our inmmune system just like a virus but to kill you by "excess of life". So what can we do to mantain sialic acid low or being use to deceive innmune system and prevent cancer? You have test to determine the levels of free sialic acid in urine. In Finland and Swedeen is common because the Salla desease.
*The sugar coating on my cells is trying to tell* TED/lecturers to stop coming up with the nonsensical titles for their videos/presentations.
Stranger Happened lol.why is it so?
Because this dumbing-down is not necessary. The coating does not try to tell you anything, by definition it can not. You do not need to ensoul things to explain them; we are not in kindergarten any more.
What would you name this talk then? Keep in mind that this is to attract people who have zero background in biology and medicine.
Something like "How sugar coating of human cells can help to treat cancer" -- accessible and accurate, but without the kindergarten language.
So suger is complex and may look like plantes in a forrest.
Is this medicine working on Salic acid in cancer cell or on immune cells to activate it ??
I’m a little confused in the last words
Alaa Al she in particular is working on getting rid of the salic acid on the cancer cells, since they are to blame for the immune cells not recognizing wether the cell is bad or not. You can sort of compare the salid acid to a “drug” that puts the function of the immune cell “to sleep” an to not suspect anything. That is the problem with the salic acid, it hides the fact that the cell is a cancer cell
* sialic
Wow
.. and that my friends is how I won the Nobel
its trying to tell you to eat less sugar
How to be healthy:
Do resistence training (free weight)
Do cardio (play sports)
Eat whole food
DONT eat sugar and fat trans
Have a good social life
daniel muñoz The last one is tricky
Hela naa. Its mean having joyfull relationships. Non many toxic friends but just a few good friends.
daniel muñoz
With so many fake people nowadays, it's even more difficult.
Wouldn't it be great if life was that simple?
Corey Doyle wouldn't it be boring?
THE IS MORE MICROSCOPIC LIFE ON AND INSIDE YOU,,, THAN YOU.
The wonders of life and the universe are mere reflections of microscopic particles engaged in a pointless dance fully choreographed by the laws of physics.
This assumes that cancer only needs a cure, and not prevention. That cancer is not caused by the way we eat and live, and that you're simply unlucky to get it. While my heart goes out to all people with cancer and their families and friends, it's just that I've seen this so many times- that a new treatment has come out, but people still die from it, like my cousin. I don't think it's enough to find a cure for cancer, there needs to be a concerted effort to prevent it, as well. GO VEGAN!!!
Great talk, though, and good luck with making new medicines, Carolyn!☺
no it does not, all it says is that eventually we can cure any cancer, the origin of the cancer is a whole different story.
I've been thinking about how to respond to your response, and I really don't know how to say this without sounding like an a$$hole, so please forgive me in advance. First off, I acknowledge your good intentions; that you too want to see a cancer- free world like myself and will support whatever efforts being made to realize that.
If anything, this has nothing to do with you - we're arguing about someone else's opinion - but I just felt that I needed to put this out there. It would be good for people with cancer to take their medicine and such and if some medicine is better than another in some significant way, great. It seems weird to be against that. And up to that extent, I'm ok with it. I was just trying to say that even if the best cancer cures were invented and made available to the public, if people keep living the way that they do, they'll just keep on getting cancer and while cures for whatever cancer they get will be available, I don't find it to be such an elegant answer to keep swallowing pills to solve problems that we create by eating the way we do.
A more holistic answer, a preventative one rather than a curative one, would not only provide a solution to the problem, but also free up these scientists to use their brilliant brains to solve other problems.
I don't know if this comment makes any sense, really, I just felt the need to leave this here for people with cancer or their families. There are alternative medicine clinics in places like South America that cure cancer without subjecting people to tons of radiation that will kill them eventually. My cousin had stomach cancer. He contracted it about 10 years ago and went on medication. It worked the first time and successfully went into remission. But 2 years ago, it came back and took him in a year flat. I've always been troubled by it, because by the end of it all, it wasn't the cancer that killed him, it was the chemotherapy. Long story short, he didn't have a stomach at the end of his life, just lumps of charred organic matter. That's what the chemo did to him. He didn't eat at anything during his last months on this Earth. He went from 200 to 45 pounds in a matter of weeks. And it was painful to see him like that. He didn't smoke or drink and would even regularly do exercise, riding his bike to work and with his cycling group. But still, he got cancer. It's not enough to just watch out for the really extreme stuff, even the more normal, traditional foods cooked with modern methods are still just as dangerous. For anyone else who will read this comment, please watch what you eat. Health and fitness are not the same thing, and attractiveness is even further out on the scale. I don't know much, but being vegan is one of our best bets in these modern times.
Oh c'mon
8iaventri Vegans get cancer too.
They also tend to be the longest surviving people on the planet. They also tend to be really whiny online, like myself. Or really sensitive to a lot of issues that they may not need to be sensitive about. Look, I'm not trying to say that there is no chance of getting cancer on a vegan diet, that it is perfect or anything, or that the people practicing it are perfect, but that since we have to eat food to survive and what we eat has a bearing on how prone we are to getting diseases, including but not limited to cancer, then eating better is more ideal than eating worse. It's just a lot better to be steeped in a regimen that cuts out a lot of the probability of getting cancer. That's why I'm saying being vegan would be a step in the right direction, or majorly plant based, if that's too hard for some. And that such should take precedence over finding a cure that will eventually be sold to people for a profit. She must have the best of intentions in doing this, but I'm just asking how it is that people can cure themselves of cancer without such medicines. That to me proves that it is much less important to sell the idea that the cure is yet to be found, than to change the way we live.
While it is important to practice science, that science should be viewed in a less reductionist manner. A more holistic approach, one that touches on the changes that don't cost an arm and a leg would be better suited.
Can you transform bloodtypes into each other with the right enzymes and transform blood donations into universal blood-types?
I think (non-expert) the body might do that. Based on her description and vague recollection of high school physiology, it sounds like the body will turn O blood (universal donor) to A, B, or AB (universal recipient) blood. So in principle, we could turn A, B, AB blood into O blood and give it to anyone.
IsYitzach That's not how it works. O-type blood is simply not recognised as foreign. It performs all the normal functions of blood, and then dies, and the body replaces it with it's own cells. Hence why blood transfusions often have to be continuous (every day or week, et cetera)
If I have a misconception, I don't think you answered it. Blood transfusion for acute cases (car accident, surgery) should be one done, blood transfusion replaces loss, blood transfusion dies, but that's alright, body has it. Chronic blood loss (chronic iron deficiency, anaemia) blood transfusion is repeated as stated.
But that wasn't the question. The question was, can you turn one blood type into another. The answer is: I don't know, but it smells like something the body can do, but I don't know if it a thing it actually does.
IsYitzach I just told you it does not. O-type is O-type. It stays that way. You can detect O-type in a transfusion recipient's blood until all the erythrocytes die off.
a body cannot change its blood type. if a person has blood type O, the immune system during their early stages has already recognized O type as self. O blood type doesn't have any antigen so any other blood type (A, B, AB ) will be recognized as foreign (since they have antigen) and attack the other blood types which can be fatal. Then you have the Rh factor which is again very specific and body just cannot alter that.
call me when it's cured
pumpuppthevolume lol
Like a Buzfeed quiz
So too much sialic acid is a cloak
Please subtitle indonesian language
this drug is called Cannabis Oil ;)
yeah gay panic ( she is gorgeous)
Interesting talk but frustratingly patronising. Why say 'sugar' when in reality these carbohydrates bonded to trans memb. prot.s are actually glycoproteins? Why say 'taste' when she could explain the very basic concept of the lock and key hypothesis which is simple enough? It's not like the audience are idiots you could at least use words that are aimed at people above primary school age.
second
this girl needs to tell ppl that white sugar is bad not natural fruit sugar
Del Rey You just, only slightly, missed the point.
if i lye her if i jus ley here wod u lai wif me
just fer a lil waeel
I have watched it for 3 times.