Guy FORCES Cops To Give Up And Leave!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 9 июл 2023
- Second Channel: / @johnlang6593
Spotify: spoti.fi/439TpHT
Patreon: / audittheaudit
Twitter: / audittheaudit
Submit your videos here: auditheaudit@gmail.com
Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com
Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.
This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.
Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.
FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.
Original video: • know your rights
1 love Ent’s channel: / @1loveent125
Sources:
Whren v. United States- bit.ly/3gX0kyJ
Utah v. Strieff- bit.ly/3prr7cY
United States v. Rusher- bit.ly/3CNilsV
United States v. Place- bit.ly/3dYJ7Sd
Indianapolis v. Edmond- bit.ly/3rpswOz
Illinois v. Caballes- bit.ly/3aYrksV
Rodriguez v. United States- bit.ly/2LS1sqc
Partlow v. State- bit.ly/3Pt5L9J
Steck v. State- bit.ly/43WDAEP
Key phrase from the supervisor-“ONCE the dog alerts…” unbelievable!
Fact!
"I said IF" 🙄no.. no you did not.
I had to run that part back cuz he had me thinking he said if..lmao
anything you say can and will be used against you.
I ran it back too I was hoping I wasn’t the only one
Pigs 😒
I will always find it amazing how a " well trained dog" can supersede the spirit of the fourth amendment
Further, how can the canine testify? What is the record for false positives? How often is the dog recertified?
Can I train my own dog to search around vehicles owned by cops? It's not a violation of the 4th so what's the problem?
@@quintessenceSL
I know people who train these dogs. They come out of training and are ruined within weeks.
They go from being rewarded for a proper search, whether or not they find something. Then once on the force, if they don’t alert, they’re stuffed into the back of the vehicle rudely. Whereas a false positive is rewarded. How long does it take for the dog to learn that alerting is the way to go.
A friend of mine had her car torn apart because she had a female dog in heat in the vehicle that got the sniffer dog very excited.
63.5% successful detection rate inside the car and 57.9% success outside the car. Marginally better than random guessing.
Dogs shouldn't be used in law enforcement. When an Officer is running after someone, he understands that he's foot chasing a suspect. A dog's instinct doesn't discern between a suspect and prey. If the "suspect" is too hard to catch, the dog could instinctively switch to an easier target, like an innocent kid or an old lady. This happens too often with dogs that are rewarded for hurting people as part of their training. Municipal governments are reckless and barbaric.
@@benoitbrown9400and this has been a known fact for a long time. It just shows how the lawmakers treat us like dumb cattle. It's proven to not work, but let's keep hitting the poor with it to make them poorer
Always love the “if you don’t have anything to hide” just give up all your rights and let us do whatever we want.
100 percent agree!
It's so simple! If you let us trample your rights and sense of dignity, then we won't trample your face (your dignity is getting wrecked either way)! What's so hard to understand?!?
Just ask the cop if you can perform a rectal examination for narcotics on him.
I mean, if he has nothing to hide?
My genitals have been well trained to detect the presence of drugs inside a jackbooted thug's bodily orifices. No 4th amendment problems!@@damianbouras
E X A C T L Y. That specifically removes consent if they're just going to do it anyway
This is such a clear cut case of racial bias that it's insane.
"if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to worry about"
what about the videos of police planting drugs in vehicles during searches?
That one kid blew a 0.0 on a breathalyzer and they still arrested him. Literally proved he had nothing to hide and it didn't matter they still arrested him ☹️
That’s exactly why u have something to worry about. They want u to let them search but u can’t watch nor get close enough to record urself, big no no!
I had nothing to hide. They held me more than an hour locked in their car while they trashed mine.
NEVER CONSENT!
@@ThereIsNoOtherHandleLikeMine i get pulled over again they are not checking my vehicle n 2nd i am askin a lot of questions names n badge numbers.
@@smoketaylor2885no duh that’s what he just said
This whole "fishing" for criminals is getting out of hand
We need to make sure police budgets don't depend on meeting the same arrest stats as the previous year. What kind of f'ed up way of policing is that??
And using the dogs to do so pisses me off. I grew up helping my parents train dogs like this and they stopped selling dogs to police dept's.due to crap like this, along with the dogs tend to get abused or neglected and treated like equipment to some cops - Cops have a very high rate of anger management and family abuse issues, I think they have a hard time turning off the 'abuse the civillian' switch when they get home and just beat the wife and kid and pets to make the time go by before they can get back out there.
@@TCK-9 Using dogs as drug sniffers pisses me off in general. As we saw in previous incidents, they can command the dog to make the same move as if they sniffed something. So if they want to get someone for nothing, they can make the dog alarm. This is BS
@@TCK-9 the dogs get ruined so fast. They’re smart dogs. If they don’t alert, they get shoved back in the vehicle by a pissed off cop. Whereas a false alert gets rewarded.
How long does it take for a dog to figure that game out?
Police dogs are pigs too. I'm glad you're family stopped turning dogs into pigs.
Please file a complaint and sue. We can’t let them get away with crap like this
I don't think he has a case
They would have pulled them out he would have got paid though
No, a cop telling you to get out of the car is a lawful order. Get out, stay calm, and don't say shit. If they want to do a false arrest, then you've got them for a lottery payout.@@chucktalor716
Licking those boots
@@chelseamolina5840??
Cop:
"Once the dog alerts."
7 seconds later
"I SAID IF"
🤔
Any cop that violates a citizens rights should automatically get an F because they're supposed to know the law that they are enforcing because they are law "enforcement officers"
Apparently ATA doesn't see it that way anymore unless they turn into violent psychopaths
There's a big difference between a cop who can emotionally handle the job, and is probably just following bad practices as told to him by his superiors, and a cop who can't keep his emotions/biases in check. The former can be mostly fixed with better superiors and some retraining.
I'd like to see more D+'s: the highest possible failing grade, but I understand ATA's logic
Ata is a bootlicker
It's funny how they seem to know all the laws they can use to penalise somebody but are apparently unaware of those that protect somebody, and can just fall back on qualified immunity
I have absolutely no respect for the police….. the bad cops have poisoned the whole lot of them….they can’t be trusted….they don’t know the laws and they make up their own
The cops only get a C ? Be real man, when that cop opened the door they were ready for some action. Respect to the man for not falling in their trap.
Yeah, ATA has been giving these tyrants pretty lenient grades. ATA gave a blatant tyrant a B+ in a different video
They didn’t taze or thump him. Yeah that’s how low the F bar is.
100% agree!
@@NA-kr5uq I have been watching ATA for awhile now. and how I have seen him "grade" these interactions is based on the legality of the law not them being a tyrant...
I would agree ATA is too lenient. I don't expect LEOs to know the subtle nuances of the law (even judges retire to their chambers to look up statutes), but If an LEO illegally performs a common basic task (here illegally extending the stop), it should be an automatic F.
"If you have nothing to hide..." is such a terrifying statement. They will find something to put on you
Yes.
We are at a point where every complaint against a cop needs to be put in front of a jury of our peers because they can't seem know the laws and also need to be forced EVERYONE OF THEM to do the schooling needed to be an officer. WHY THE HELL IS IT 4 YEARS FOR A TEACHER AND 6 WEEKS FOR POLICE WORK legally
The fact that those “men” don’t even know the law yet are trusted to enforce it is TERRIFYING.
Very scary....
Who said they don’t know the law? Any constitutional violation would have to be hashed out by a court. It’s FAR from clear they violated anything. It’s entirely possible another officer beyond the officer who made the stop was running checks, and preparing a warning while the initial officer assisted with the stop. There’s equally a strong possibility everything that happened WAS constitutional
why quote men? they are literally men.
You can blame the “training” for why many police officers are like this. They are trained to follow orders and policies, not the law. And this is the problem with police today.
@ I’m not sure if English is your first language, but there’s a “be a man” phrase. Also, what they’re doing is subhuman.
"Are you giving us consent to search the vehicle?"
"NO!"
"Alright, then step out."
That's not how that works, buddy. Conversation should've stalled immediately.
Yh that immediately shows retaliation
Stopped, not stalled
@@Bigfire253which apparently these cops get a C for
@@NA-kr5uq stamp a big red F on their forehead
Made my head explode.
This is why recording is important. He said “once the dog alerts.” Now he’s implying there’s no choice, they’re going to search irregardless.
Irregardless is not a word
This man deserves an A for dealing with these tyrants
This is a classic case of profiling. Dismissed the reason for pulling him over only to basically use another excuse to look for drugs.
"Driving while black" and with dreads.
100
Absolutely, black man with different plates than us, must be a drug dealer. smh
Exactly, pull you over for the pettiest of reasons just to try and invade your personal space with a vehicle search. It’s a disgrace that police are allowed to do this. None of this mans actions says he possibly has drugs but yet they can’t just give him a ticket and move on. And of this man wasn’t recording I guarantee you they would have pulled him out of the car and arrested him for “obstruction”.
Wish they would set up outside some country clubs and watch to see if individuals leaving parties at the club actually bother to stop. Let the upper class experience a bit what everyone else is experiencing.
What I get from watching your videos is that we as citizens are supposed to know the law in and out better than the people who are hired to know and endure the law. That's absolutely ridiculous.
Especially when RUclipsrs like We the People U say 'it's our job to help educate the public and law enforcement' -since when did it become a civilian's job to educate LAW ENFORCEMENT? That's their job, and the police academy's and bcs those institutions continue to fail, it should not fall on the shoulders of civilians who are already targeted to then be ready to educate.
If other 1st world countries don't have the same problem, it isn't because their civilians are going around educating law enforcement when they're stopped and detained for no reason
I've had to know the law better than court appointed attorneys because none of them would fight for me or somebody else that I knew so yeah that's how it is unfortunately. And yes you can get arrested even for the police lying and then you'll have to fight your way through that with terrible terrible attorneys I even had a paid for attorney that was just awful didn't care about the law and clearly was working with a prosecutor and they were all hand and hand working together against me which is absolutely despicable especially when it costs thousands of dollars and the corner pointed attorneys just didn't care and you know if a court appointed attorney doesn't do their job you can get the case overturned but when it's criminal you really don't want to go through all that because it's scary and it's just awful what police and prosecutors do to regular people especially when they're lying.
Journalists need to look into law enforcement academies. I suspect some are much worse than others.
How much time does each spend on teaching law, and how much on target practice?
Why don’t LEs shoot fleeing vehicle TIRES instead of drivers’ heads? Especially when they’re standing right next to the vehicle. There’s no excuse.
There is no excuse for not knowing the law.....THAT ISNT JUST FOR US...THATS FOR THESE TYRANTS ALSO!
@shama-llamading-dong5370 pretty much, shady and corrupt behavior that teeters on tyranny apparently is ok till they get violent
It's a shame that courts have allowed most of what happened in this video. These justices are traitors and should be treated accordingly
Right, these rulings are riddled with contradictions... When law enforcement agencies openly violate protected Constitutional Rights, excuses are made over and over in rulings... This is the ongoing criminal behavior of law enforcement, thus protected by the U.S Courts... The man's personal dashcam is imperative... This is a case of damn if you do and damn if you don't, especially when law enforcement agencies can and will afflict harm and/or death to a person that fully complies and step out of their vehicle was asked to do so... Not sure if that even matters to ATA🤷♂️
Traitors? I mean, sure, no one is 100% loyal to their own country, social class, beliefs, etc, at all times, but the word traitor should be reserved for people more heinous than ignorant/bad justices. That's my opinion, at least.
@@sarcastaball imo they have betrayed their oaths and the very principles this country stands for. I will agree it's strong language, but I would say these justices are More so traitors than Edward snowden for example.. the amount of lives destroyed by these types of decisions are pretty extreme
ATA I’m so happy to have you review a k9 search. I was a K9 LEO for 6 years with the US Army and specialized in all of the legal aspects and court precedent of k9 in the US. You definitely covered a ton of the content surrounding this content.
I know you don’t comment on details that are option based and focus on facts, I would like to add that in my 6 years of experience where I worked with all layers of k9 (USSS, DHS, DOD, FBI, State, Local, ATF, & TSA) and in my experience, local k9 are some of the most undisciplined and guys out there. Handlers like this gentleman has obviously let his weight go, and hovered over his dog to stay focused on the vehicle, and in my professional opinion is likely to have undertrained an effective dog. Most local and state k9 have false positive rates somewhere around 50% or above, meaning if they were to search 10 blank areas that have never been exposed to narcotics, they would have 5 false alerts. And on the opposing side they miss quite often because they never train with street obtained narcotics. These handlers tend to be unsupervised. I urge people to challenge their LE k9 if ever going to court and request the dogs records because it will expose this if they are doing any at all.
The DOD has some of the strictest k9 standards in my opinion. I felt as though we were the best of the best. Marines were maybe better than army dogs, depending on the individuals but nevertheless DOD had it right.
Excellent post . A canine sniff is like a coin flip. There needs to be a database on each dog and false alerts. Undisciplined handlers is an understatement. I’ve seen a cop call for a dog. The dog circled the car 5 times never alerted. The handler gets angry and keeps making the dog circle the car. Still doesn’t alert. The cop THEN calls in another dog. The second dog alerts after the second time around. Guess which dog the cops went with.
6:18 “Once the dog alerts..”
“I SAID IF!!!”
Yea corrupt af, they make the k9s alert all the time
Yh i had to rewind that bit to be sure thats what the cop said and i couldn't believe it
Good catch. FTP but he did say "if" a few seconds later (that's what I heard). He did say the real situation out loud. The dog will falsely alert far too often. Sadly, as w/ far too many Americans, pigs have no verbal skills.
@@northdetroit7994 Freudian slip. The cop said WHEN. When the dude pointed it out the cop denied it and claimed he said IF. Gaslighting 101.
I know I wasn't the only one that wasn't tripping about that he try to fix what he said thinking the guy is dumb or something like he didn't hear what he said
The scariest thing I heard on this was "Once the dog alerts." That should get the cop a 14 day unpaid vacation.
Fired
Then he tried to say he said "if" lying ass mofo
Also, het rid of that dog! All he does is show up and alert? Fire that dog.
Imprisoned for rights violations
@@Bigfire253 USC 18 - 242
There's no doubt in my mind that this was racial profiling
They ask you to exit the vehicle for "officer safety", yet when there's multiple armed agents outside my car telling me to get out, i can't say no for "citizen safety". I understand their safety, and all the unknowns that are intailed with dealing with hundreds of random people every day. But we as citizens deal with hundreds of randoms every day also. Safety should be a 2 way street. Seems nothing more than an escalation tactic to me. Good show!
Hmm is that true?
@@KurtBenning yup, sure is. SCOTUS has ruled that removing you from the vehicle is allowed. Yet refusing is obstructing, resisting. Get a good attorney.
Violating multiple constitutional rights while being law enforcement should be treason
apply that to politicians too, we'd probably be out of them very quickly.
no shit
It is treason, we just have no power to enforce it.
What exactly did they violate? Pennsylvania vs mimms says they can pull you out of the car, and the supreme Court says dog's can legally sniff around you're car, so what constitutional right was violated?
@@markheckman2196 unreasonable search and seizure applies to traveling unmolested. Pulling him over for no reason and keeping him there is violating his rights, even if it doesn't violate the law.
This man made some mistakes, like talking too much, but besides that he held his ground! I’m glad this ended well without him being kidnapped.
In this situation I think he had to keep talking. He was voicing Truths
I would caution about giving consent to do more k9 sweeps.
It seems that black people have so much difficulty with keeping quiet and calm.
@@eugenetswong Black has nothing to do with it.
@@eugenetswong hey, the senseless "let's bring race into this for zero reason" guy showed up. You're kinda early.
He seemed to consent to a search. I don't think that he needed to consent to anything in this situation, nor do I recall offering consent being advantageous in this situation.
This is the reason why everyone needs a dash cam in front and the back of your vehicle.
Could have proved right there on the spot that he stopped before leaving the parking lot.
@@karinaz8756 Never show the cops. Let them lie and bust their balls in court. Plus they might try to get the video.
@@themanhimself3 can’t get the video without a warrant.!
@@karinaz8756 On paper that's true but police illegally take and "lose" footage all the time. It's better to just act like you don't have it until court or lawyer request. Or some people give up the footage because they don't know their rights.
“The dog didn’t find anything so I just wanted to ask if you have drugs in the car”
Lol bruh
These cops have that look of C+ intelligence and they peaked in highschool. Absolute bullies.
C+ is extremely kind. Remember D students still graduate. These jabronis are D students at best.
I've seen police officers who I knew in school. They were bullies/idiots back then. Made me ask how the hell they became a cop. It must be a requirement. "Do you like to push people around? We'll do we have a career for you"
ATA never gives the cops a D. I seen Fs and Cs but never a D.
If you score too high on the entrance exam ... then you just failed the entrance exam.
They only accept candidates who score an equivalent of a "C" grade.
They argued that more intelligent officers might get confused and/or "think too much" ... instead of blindly following orders.
.
So, think of how dumb the "average person" is and realise that the smartest cop is as smart as that "average person" (at best) ...
Now think about how "smart" the average cop must be.
@@adcolt54 I think he donates to the police retirement fund.
These cops are in dire need of legal training. The residents of the county deserve better.
*country
Why do lawyers need 4-8 years of schooling to argue about the law *if cops can enforce the law at gunpoint after only a few months of training???*
They need different training too. These police are trained to ignore the law and do what their superiors tell them to do. Why do you think they rarely get punished for violating the law like they do? Because you can’t punish someone for doing what you tell them to do. This is also why they hate being recorded by us. Because they know there is nothing they can do to stop a citizen from publishing their own video. But they can hide or delete body cam footage to cover their own wrongdoing.
@@ianbattles7290 because cops aren't interested in upholding the law. as a concept, police protect capital. practically, police districts secure revenue for the city via fines. on a personal level, cops may have a retributive interest in enforcing the law as they understand it (read: poorly). but at NO level is policing interested in upholding law.
@@ianbattles7290 "a few months of training" ?
I believe it's only six weeks.
6:18 " once the dog alerts "
He got'em
He called it
And the cop tired to lie like he didn't say it less then 3 seconds ago
I always gain more knowledge from every Audit the Audit video. Thanks!
Lol "if you have nothing to hide, then go ahead and give up your rights"
It is ridiculous how often that line works.
I would say these cops are lazy, but it is effective
If a cop is trying to intimidate you into doing something you LEGALLY don’t have to do, alarm bells should be going off in your head. The law says they can’t get into your car. So why do they want in it so bad. It goes both ways.
“You have anything illegal in your house? Can I come over later and make sure?”
Its crazy they need that many cops for a moving violation. They think everyone is a criminal
Moving while black or brown is a crime in America.
There must be absolutely no crime in Cumberland if they can afford to send this many cops to a simple traffic infraction...
@@ianbattles7290they used to be a well known speed trap. 18:07 I guess they have graduated to civil forfeiture as it brings in more money. Hated the otherwise great area because of it. You had to drive 10 mph below the speed limit, watch for sudden changes in signage that was obscured and be going the new speed as you passed the sign. I dont speed but enough of my friends and people on the roads got tickets for not going from 55 mph to 45 in 2 seconds.
Already profiled the guy, so they were prepared for what they've already convicted him of doing their minds.
@@beepbop6697He even said he stopped and waited for traffic to pass (or else he would have been hit by an oncoming car)
It's cool to see AtA looking at the exclusionary rule. I wrote a 10 page research paper on the history of the exclusionary rule for a college credit class in high school and I think it was some of the best work I've done. It's satisfying to know exactly what supreme court cases are going to be brought up before the episode starts.
great video going over the details of this stop and the caselaw around it. really appreciate the details shared here.
People in positions of power don't deserve it, and those who deserve it don't want it. Think about that..
Its true
I deserve it… and i want it.
Einstein was offered the PM position in neqly formed Israel after WWII. He said he was too smart to waste his life with such a terrible position.
Good point
this is why you should give it to the one who don't want that power we have an example with the prophet muhammed that named abu bakr to have power after he died
14:22 That officer is so pissed it didn't go the way he had planned. Facial expression said everything and then some.
The dog gets a treat every time he alerts. Doesn't matter if the alert was true or false. This alone should tell you enough.
Love the content! This is more like a public service than most public services. Ever think of going back and doing follow up on some of the cases you have covered?
"Once the dog alerts" the cop said.
Not "if".
I’m always surprised at the number of police officers, equipment, dogs etc that are used in cases like this. They must have plenty of money to spend.
There must be absolutely no crime in this city if the cops have this much free time.
The taxpayers have plenty of money to spend. They couldn’t care less how we feel about it. They just take take and take. And then they violate our rights and take our money to pay us off.
It’s like a child stealing money out of his mom’s purse to pay for her Mother’s Day gift.
Use the budget or lose the budget. Next year they'll ask for more. guaranteed
They have extorted too much money from the people who are just trying to make a living.
I thought I paid for my subscription. I will check tomorrow. Right now I can't reply.
“No drugs in my vehicle sir, this my work car”
👀
New law: everytime as officer uses the "...if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to worry about...", their person, personal car(s), and residence should be subjected to canine search by a dog that "We The People" certify.
I bet he saved himself from a planting of evidence by not getting out.
The dog didn’t hit because he was recording the handler.
I'm getting better at grading these. Thank you for educating the public.
First time in history a police dog didn't alert.. they pulled me over one time and walked a stuffed animal around my car and said it alerted.. it wasn't even a dog it was a toy horse
These cops just assumed the guy had drugs. It’s easy to see why. Profiling
This man handled himself well! Had he got out the car, no telling if they would’ve planted something on him. Profiled the guy right off the bat.
I don’t like it, it makes a citizen vulnerable.
They want him out of the car so that they can search him, for "officer safety", and then search the car to justify the arrest while claiming to smell alcohol\marijuana and performing road DUY tests. Next thing you know your car has been ransacked in a pointless search, and you have DUY charges while stone cold sober and probably a few resisting arrest\obstruction of justice charges .
That's why inviting them inside is a big no no.
People need to figure out ways to lock doors when pulled out.
@@robertnicholls9917 most cars you can lock all doors from inside and those with electronic keys can lock when you are outside your car.
Another problem I just realized. If cops handcuff you they can get your keys.
As many times as this man and his wife are getting stopped sounds like harassment, he should sue to stop it !!
They didn’t stop him for traffic. You guys know why they stopped him. They are looking for contraband.
The part that always bothers me is just how many resources they’ll use for a single detainee - An entire precinct on a traffic stop. I feel for the man bc I have been stopped under questionable circumstances myself.
They can literally just say you weren't wearing a seatbelt and then everything they do after is all justified according to the supreme court. Even if you were wearing it they can say "oh i thought he wasnt" and theyll say they acted in good faith. Then you better have an interior camera that can prove you had it on, but still the traffic stop is "reasonable" because of "good faith".
Terry vs Ohio
Delete Lawz lectures about this ruling.
@@Blue-hf7xtDelete Lawz 😂😂😂 he's a joke
@@Chris.Rhodes And yet not wrong. Notice nobody claims he's WRONG. They just joke on him.
@@Chris.Rhodes keep laughing, I don’t care what you think
I never laugh about anybody who is actively out there fighting for all of our rights
Except too apree maybe, the guy is intentionally hilarious
"If you got nothing to hide" is the biggest load of crap to violate your rights.
Good report as always sir! 🤟👍
I give him an A for not getting out the car and catching a "legal" beat down from those tyrants.
Me too. He gets an A for calling their bluff. He’s right - that’s a guaranteed paycheck . Pretty much why those cops backed down. If they would have touched him that qualified immunity would have disappeared like a fart in the wind.
Yeah me too. Especially after we learn of the supreme court case where cops may order you and all occupants out of the car. What I'm getting from the legal eagle framing this whole shebang is that if the stop itself is unwarranted or illegal, then all subsequent criminal charges -- such as refusing to exit -- become null and void.
At worst they took a few minutes of his time. I don't see how he could get a financial windfall given the lack of damages
@@jackburton2680 that’s why he needs to file a complaint. As the complaints stack up from all of these “warnings” he has a case. He is clearly being profiled targeted and his rights are being violated. These cops threatened to pull the man out of his car. That’s a big deal. Threats of violence from a cop is ALWAYS a big deal.
@@philipfrisk805 that’s what I said. Had they gone hands on they would have lost their qualified immunity. Had the stop been legit - he would have a ticket. They didn’t write one because they had nothing to back up the story that he ran the stop sign. He had a camera. They had no idea what all he recorded.
The only reason that dog did, not 😉 😉, hit on the car is because the sergeant said, " When the dog hits on the car." He knew it would look bad when it did and they found nothing. It will just bring more attention to how vague and the possible abuse to circumvent the 4th amendment those supposed dog sniffs and alerts are.
Cop tried every bs trick in the book to get fake consent. give these guys a F
I wish he would stop saying, “This is my work vehicle. There’s no drugs in here.” It implies his other vehicle has drugs.
Here's a police/security secret: K9 handlers put more weight on the *person's reaction* to the dog more than the actual results of the dog's sniff. Handlers know they can make the dog alert when there is nothing and dogs may not alert when something is present. But if the suspect shows signs when the dog shows up (like dialated pupils, sudden shallow breathing, and other signs of nervousness/fear/adrenaline) handlers just force the dog to alert and use that as justification to search further.
School police, concert/festival security, city/state police, and even Homeland Security (TSA, immigration, border patrol, etc) all take advantage of visual cues you give them to single you out for increased screening.
They always want to charge you with "resisting arrest" and "obstruction of justice" or "disorderly conduct" or "failure to ID" but what did they do to get those charges to begin with because they weren't charged with anything else but those things.
Yes. those are all secondary charges, aren't they? I admired the way you wrote it, bro. I even copied it.
They protected and served the SHIT out of this dude
Objectively prolonged the length of the stop to do the drug sniff
the issue is that he was pulled over for a traffic stop. Extending the length of the stop beyond what a reasonable time to write the ticket is a second seizure that requires reasonable suspicion.. These clowns never even started the normal interaction for the alleged traffic violation. That's a violation
That first cop threatened to pull him out of his car after about 5 seconds. That cop needs an attitude adjustment before he hurts an innocent citizen.
He changed his tune once the driver called his bluff .
He needs a new career.
It's almost like they were trying to set him up with the search but then he was on to them so they didn't finish their trap
I saw a recent video where a canine was brought in and did not signal anything. The cops immediately brought in a different dog that allegedly signaled to give cops probable cause for search of the vehicle. Nothing illegal was found.
This is a normal occurrence in that particular area. The Cumberland police force believe they are big bad drug busters and will pull over anyone with out of state tags or even in state tags if the address comes back from being an hour or more out of their area. Just look deeper into the department, they’ve had tons of complaints.
The entire argument that a dog sniff isn't a violation is garbage. I feel that unless there is probable cause having a dog sniff for shit, which I might add, has a far higher failure rate than a successful one, governments shouldn't be able o have a dog sniff. The fact that there is a higher failure rate than a success rate should be considered by the supreme court. But they have to have some authority over us.
My sentiment exactly. Worst of all, it comes from SCOTUS.
Dogs do have incredibly sensitive noses, I'm completely sure they are more than capable of detecting just about anything in a car, from drugs, to money, to weapons, you name it, and I would absolutely support using dogs for searches, just as soon as you get that dog on the stand and he can testify about what he smelled/found. Until then, it's just a "that was easy" button for getting around the 4th amendment.
"once the dog alerts"
"Why are you saying it's going to?"
"I said if."
"Well once the dog alerts...." "I said 'if'....." Lying ass piece of waste, had a Freudian slip and said the quite part loud.
Not immediately complying in Maryland is either bravery or craziness, knowing their less than stellar history. I fully expected him to get dragged out, beaten, possibly killed. Im glad it didnt go that way.
I live in MD and can corroborate your statement. It’s even worse in these small rural communities. The small town cops and sheriffs run the towns and hassle the public and abuse their authority regularly. Just drive around Carroll County, the Sheriff department has turned the county into a police state. I hate driving through that county.
@@lordchaa1598 You know its bad, when Europeans (Im from Finland) know their reputation.. Be careful out there, film even smallest interaction with these thugs, just to be on the safe side. Your own footage wont get “lost”, censored, turned off, altered, etc.
Respect to that guy for standing up for himself
I love how you all manage to react this 18 mins video, only is out at 2 mins xD
@@brunopereira8811 yes im built
@@brunopereira8811 Most of us have already seen this video. Did you REALLY believe AtA only shows exclusive content? 😅
@@brunopereira8811 I saw this initial video like a month ago on other channels. These are not ata exclusive or anything.
@@PepeToTheMooonme too
Most police "sniffer" dogs ARE NOT FOR DRUGS. Here in Winnipeg, there are NO drug dogs, but there ARE 12 body-sniffing dogs. They will trot one out and pretend it's a drug dog and get it to signal when they want.
the intro sound just gives me chills
This gentleman needs a dashcam
The problem with All these laws and cases is We the innocent are suspicious/guilty in cop eyes and have to provide evidence of our innocences.
The People vs Copland
I agree. Laws should be very clear and not loaded with "and", "but", "however", "except", etc. etc.
"Innocent until proven guilty" is the biggest lie we tell ourselves in this country. Cops are trained to treat us as guilty until proven innocent.
ATA! I don’t think it is fair that we the citizens are supposed to know the law better that those who are “hired” and “trained” to enforce the law. 😢
They know the law.they are just hoping he doesn’t
love your channel dude
I have 2 issues with the driver. #1 He rolled his window all the way down (NEVER do that). #2 His door was unlocked allowing the officer to easily open it. (NEVER do that either).
He also told the officers he would open the back door and let the dog in
Also he doesn't plead the 5th.
The more you hinder the police, the higher the chances that something goes wrong. Just cooperate, if the cops f*** up THEN you sue them.
@@lunni9009 Sounds good ... now imagine instead of you getting one traffic stop, lets say every 5 year. You get one every month, or more ... The more stops the more chances of something going wrong and if you are dead, fat good suing them will do for you. OR what if you get hurt in a way to permanently handicap yourself. Do you prefer the money or all functionality of your body?
We have seen too many videos where even the wrong look or not kissing a cops behind is a way for some (racist) cops to escalate basic stops into violent arrests.
People getting fed up with excessive stops, especially those who have a "you do not belong in this area" type of feel behind it, happen way too much.
I live in Europe, and in over 25 years had exactly, one! stop happen to me. Ask the average black/hispanic person in the US their average stop rate... Its not going to be 1 in 25 years.
When people do not react/stand for their rights this misuse behavior became so routine, that the laws protecting people vanishes.
Yes, lock the door. But you should always roll the window down (unless you have been drinking or smoking pot). It shows that you are co-operating.
These videos always make me so tense. This guy being able to argue and stay cool under something that would make me angry or scared is something I am very envious of. Good on him.
Police should be REQUIRED to keep records of how often there dogs supposedly alert vs how often there are no drugs, pointing to false alerts by the dog or cop.
"I like to fish"
So does the Fuzz
I don’t think I have EVER seen a stop sign at the exit of a gas station? How could this be considered an offence in the first place?
My biggest concern with "dog sniff" is they do not keep track of when they do a dog sniff, if the K9 "hits" or doesn't "hit" and how many times when the K9 does hit and they search and found nothing. This is all information that should be recorded and tracked.
Exactly - there needs to be a database of false alerts.
This looks like a case of profiling and stalking.
The problem is that few people file complaints against these dirty cops.
If Mr Love had got out of his car he would have been cuffed and possibly arrested on some made up charge, even beaten. Staying in his car may have been his best option, even if he legally obliged to exit his vehicle.
If he would have gotten out of the car he would have been cuffed and they ABSOLUTELY would have let the dog INSIDE THE CAR even though he DID NOT give consent.
The Civil Rights Lawyer mentioned in a recent video that it's not the case that cops can order you out of the car as a matter of routine but many don't understand that. Apparently there has to be some legitimate officer safety reason. But it wasn't the main topic of the video and he didn't expand on it. I'd like to see a video expanding on when cops can make you exit the car.
All he has to do is say "Due to my years of experience, I noticed some furtive movements that allowed me to ascertain that he was carrying some kind of implement which could of hurt me or my fellow officers, so I asked the subject to exit the vehicle" (they always talk like that, think it makes em sound professional or something) and then it's reasonable. The court is on their side, not yours.
I’m glad the law seems to dictate that a dog sniffing around doesn’t violate your rights because they don’t enter the vehicle.
Basically they’re saying you’re allowed to r*pe an underage girl so long as you never penetrate them. I’m glad to hear that… really makes me feel safe and protected and served!
Sue the hell out of them!!!!!
This whole chain of action has to be brought to an end. People need to be left alone while driving unless there is reckless driving involved. I hate paying police to harass people.
How else would PD raise money for themselves and the city?
@@nicholastime1513 That works for me since I use a bicycle and there not being any cars would make the roads safer.
@@GenialHarryGroutonly a cyclist would think that a road full of cyclists would be safer, like it wouldn't just be a bunch of dudes in bibbers running red lights.
@@thundabearz5092 Who've never been to the Netherlands then?
I love this guy's energy! I've watched it several times, and the way he handles those tyrants is classic.
Wish he hadn’t consented to the sweep. Otherwise yeah , he did great. Good job when he didn’t back down when they threatened to go hands on. He was right. That’s an EASY 6 figure paycheck. Made those cops backdown.
My neighbor is a cop with a police dog. The dog is a drug dog. My neighbor told me he can give a command that would make the dog react as though he detected drugs. My neighbor showed me when i asked to see
Inam shocked the dog didn't alert. I was waiting for it.
How TF do these cops get a C grade when you say "they have a fundamental misunderstanding of the law." Would you expect a C grade in algebra if you "have a fundamental misunderstanding of arithmetic?"
Right! Like how tf do cops being condescending, extending a stop, misunderstanding the law, focusing more on finding drugs vs traffic stop, and not approving of said things but saying hey it’s legal AND saying it’s open to officer abuse. Idk how you can defend this. Sure yeah it’s the law but it’s not okay. ATA’s ranking aren’t good frankly… this is why Lackluster is the better channel
The whole letter grade scale is silly. It’s either pass or fail. Everything else is subjective and not helpful.
At 3:00 it feels suspicious like the cops used the traffic stop excuse to investigate the dude
Cop used a false traffic stop 🛑
Duh . That’s why they gave him a warning instead of a ticket. The stop was BS. The goal was to get inside of the car the entire time. He shut it down.
@@karinaz8756 I like leaving comments while the video plays because it gives a real reaction while the stop is playing out instead if waiting till the end of the video and leaving a comment that will make me sound smart or morally superior,u wish more people did that so to get a real reaction before knowing what will happen. Lots of people dont want to do that so they can project an image of themselves being right,try it sometime with time stamps,you might be surprised that your judgement might be different then waiting till the end,thanks for the reply
Who is this narrator? He's excellent - every time.
Superb work! I love his voice.
💯💯💯
This guy was caught red handed driving while black.
Oh wow! I live in Cumberland! I hate that our officers don't have body cams.
oh ur shitting me. thats not good