F1 1991 Silverstone onboard lap (Nigel Mansell)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 3 окт 2024
  • Originally live in British television, this video shows the onboard lap of massively reworked Silverstone with Nigel Mansell of the Williams team as a driver. He also apparently comments the lap.

Комментарии • 29

  • @hw4beste970
    @hw4beste970 3 года назад +23

    Rip Murray Walker

  • @rainbowsalads
    @rainbowsalads 13 лет назад +14

    Mansell, even in the inferior cars he at times drove, could out pace any other F1 driver at Silverstone. so at this circuit alone he definitely was/probably still is the greatest. pure magic, just like senna at monaco.

    • @christschinwon
      @christschinwon 5 лет назад +4

      Absolutely! He came 2nd in a Williams Judd in 1988. Awful engine!

  • @DRIFTCKOWN
    @DRIFTCKOWN 5 лет назад +12

    Should have kept this version of Silverstone

  • @elviejo1997
    @elviejo1997 10 лет назад +11

    Nigel Mansell in a Williams-Canon-Renault going around Silverstone. I want this back. It sucks I wasn't alive during this glorious time in F1 to experience it as it happened.

    • @Reck46
      @Reck46 3 года назад

      I was there that weekend Kelvin , I want those times back also

  • @johnbarron4265
    @johnbarron4265 10 лет назад +16

    Acceleration is a vector quantity. If Mansell starts by accelerating left (-4.5 g) and then quickly transitions to accelerating right (+4.5 g), then yes, the magnitude of the acceleration he experiences is at most 4.5 g at any given moment in the complex (and you can guarantee there's at least one place where his lateral acceleration is 0.0 g by the Intermediate Value Theorem); however, his change in acceleration equals his final acceleration minus his initial acceleration, 4.5 g - -4.5 g = +9.0 g. When he says "snapping", he's referring to this change in acceleration, which occurs over a very brief interval, producing a high amoung of jerk (another vector quantity).

  • @zagozago9893
    @zagozago9893 2 года назад +1

    This was the best layout.

  • @tonypap1
    @tonypap1 13 лет назад +5

    @AosZas
    Great post. I totally agree and I think it is still overlooked how hard Mansell had to fight just to arrive in Formula1 and it's true to say that without Colin Chapman's single-minded belief in Mansell, Mansell would've never been seen in Formula (a point that has been made numerous times by Mansell himself). Even the greatest ever, Senna came from a privileged background and money was never a problem.

  • @Ghost_Lap
    @Ghost_Lap 2 года назад +5

    Mansell was a monster at Silverstone, even Senna couldn't match him.

  • @Compendium_of_tom
    @Compendium_of_tom 7 лет назад +10

    It sucks how much slower the track was made

    • @christschinwon
      @christschinwon 5 лет назад +3

      I'm still scratching my head as to why it was changed. It wasn't for safety. It was so wide and had huge run off areas being that it was built on an airfield. The only positive is that Mansell still holds the lap record for the old circuit!

  • @mukinfagic69
    @mukinfagic69 2 года назад +2

    Feel lucky to have seen, in person, them going through Bridge Corner before it was removed from the layout, the change of direction at those speeds was hard to comprehend.

  • @BOBtheNAILER757
    @BOBtheNAILER757 13 лет назад

    @loetkoe27 G loads in one direction are "unloaded" when you return to the neutral position, then "reload" when the motion moves from neutral regardless of the new direction (up down left right braking acceleration) you don't add the values from one direction to the next. and the neck strain on the drivers is significant like in a fighter because of the abrupt maneuvers both vehicles can create.

  • @garyk1334
    @garyk1334 Год назад

    Exciting times

  • @loetkoe27
    @loetkoe27  14 лет назад +2

    @frandaman27 4.5 g in one direction and same to the other makes 9 g total ;)

  • @85fredi
    @85fredi 13 лет назад +2

    @frandaman27
    9G cause it rhymes with Nigel. 9G Mansell :)

  • @arturcraft2
    @arturcraft2 12 лет назад +6

    @frandaman27 yes, I loled when he said 9 Gs of lateral load. Nigel was high that day

    • @Volvoman90
      @Volvoman90 3 года назад +1

      I think he was alluding to it's 4.5G left then 4.5G right in quick succession.

  • @TrenosUK
    @TrenosUK 13 лет назад +1

    @loetkoe27
    Unless it crashes...

  • @JL-gf3yc
    @JL-gf3yc Год назад +2

    9G Nige, Really? Did you have a puncture, a broken back and no rear wing at the time as well mate?

  • @loetkoe27
    @loetkoe27  13 лет назад

    @BOBtheNAILER757 Yeah I know you're not supposed to count it like that, but that's the only explanation for 9 G in an F1 car

  • @ricardodepaiva6195
    @ricardodepaiva6195 3 года назад

    E o curvão de Suzuka?😂😂😂😂😂👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻

  • @Davicokeiro
    @Davicokeiro 9 лет назад

    I think the audio is off...right?

    • @captdepresso3791
      @captdepresso3791 6 лет назад

      Davicokeiro yes

    • @madam94
      @madam94 3 года назад +2

      After the static as he comes onto Hanger straight it suddenly switches to a different lap. The revs change to much lower, odd thing for the TV people to do.

  • @TheNiceJackass
    @TheNiceJackass 13 лет назад

    @loetkoe27 It's probably why Mansell said "snapping 9g"

    • @morpheus19
      @morpheus19 5 лет назад

      😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂