I always wondered why Gandhi was so sympathetic to Islam and the Khilafat movement. Thank you Abhijit, for explaining about his upbringing in the Pranami sect. Now I have a clearer understanding.
@@GauravKumar-xe1oi Pirali is not a sect. Pirali Brahmins are a lineage of Bengali Kulin Brahmins one of whose ancestors converted to Islam and got renamed to Pir Ali, because that was the only way he could marry the Muslim woman he wanted to marry (as far as I remember). Later that person wanted to revert to Dharma, but not only was he not accepted by other Kulin Brahmins in the area - his entire extended family/clan was outcasted. All their descendants came to be known as Pirali Brahmins to distinguish them from other Brahmin clans.
If india's independence was to hv bn won through militant resistance you wouldnt have a india today. It would have faced stateswise conflicts and would have had to deal with a much bigger challenge. Even now you are not able to bring the country under one umbrella.
What a coincidence. My grandpa too was so critical of gandy and his policies. He disliked gandy immensely and would tell us stories about the other great men who were more worthy and nationalistic.
Your GF must had been in RSS clan... See he would never have read about any personality... It was the knowledge shared as Chinese whisper in the RSS shakha.... You will realise that sooner or later that Gandhi only did what anyone as a mediator would do , listen to British also get them to hear...
@@shredder2cop he was a British plant in lndian politics, they had to portray him big n benevolent and sometimes tweak him here and there. The Chinese whisper is what was whispered through the ears of innocent naive Indians by British plants that gandy is great and Indians believed that narrative. Sergeant gandy was an evil as even Ambedkar had narrated to BBC. Gandy was just furthering British interests in India and he stole the ideas of Lala Lajpat Rai and other freedom warriors but made them non violent just like British wanted. He made the Indian Hindus napunsak by telling them not to use force against the aggressors. What gandy did to this nation cannot be healed for centuries, he must be in dozhakh for his acts.
@@S0S0ant1 do you realise what you say.... Not sure if you have any particular writer from history in mind who has coined this theory where Ghandhi was a British stooge... Gandhi was educated. A Barrister by profession .. He was also a Brahmin....and he came from a family with high values... Are you sure of what you said both him and Nehru were Brahmins .... Wise people with family values....they had everything but they left it. They could have worked in UK too all their lives... I don't think you are indian only else would you understand what is it to assassinate the character of a Brahmin.
@@dikshantnirwan7350 periyar mat bolo. He was a womanizer and that fellow was like sadak ka gunda during those days .. They portray him as some champion of oppressed . But in reality he did treat them like shit. Other stories were alai were loomed. And as a crown jewel both dmk and that fella have did a forgery by claiming that he was awarded by the UNESCO as the Socrates of south east asia.
@@வெற்றிவேல்முருகன்-ங8ழ do you know that He burn Ramayana Chaupaaiyan and so many things against SANATAN DHARMA ! Even in today's world people's of many countries think gandhi was Mahatma, but In reality they didn't know the Arth of Mahatma Shabd which is only used for Param Tapaswi and Bhagwan. Even Mahatma is one of the 108 names of Mahavir Hanuman. And if you think he was a womanizer then ram mohan rai was also a womanizer but they does all these things against SANATAN DHARMA. Visit Hindu Café channel regarding for SATI PRATHA. And please open up your eyes soon otherwise it will be too late.
Bro Gandhi may b wrong at many places.. But overall he did non violent protests, told Satyamev jayate.. He lived a simple life unlike today's politicians.. He fought for the freedom bro.. At least let's be grateful to all freedom fighters including Gandhi.. He was a human being too just like us.. So some wrong decisions are possible.. But unlike us leaning on our couches and watching TV those days do and night they made protests, fought in the streets, organised people, had meetings many gave sacrifices.. Gandhi too died due to political reasons.. Overall those people weren't seeking the comfort that we enjoy selfishly today.. He could have earned and got a car and lived a life of comfort as he was barrister himself.. They sacrificed their life ND lifestyle for the nation... How many of us would leave our education, leave our profession ND livelihood for the nation??? At least they did so let's learn to be grateful.. Criticising is much easier.. He at least organised all people throughout India.. There has been fight for freedom always but never could be possible.. But he organised and lot of regions AnD people came together and so the British had to leave and we r enjoying now.. I don't say he is God but I feel he doesn't deserve criticism... Unlike Nehru and Jinnah he wasn't selfish.. He didn't want to be the pm or president or want posts.. He is happy that India got independent and sad that there had to partition...and if he was a bad person.. How did the contemporary leaders starting from Lal bahadur shstri , sardar Patel, chidambaram and everyone else respect his word..... What would he gain being an agent of British, he wasn't behind riches or political power... Don't Create false castles..
@@ChandraChandra-ko8uk he was a puppet of British, he delayed India's independence not fought for it. He has done not a single work for indians. He do non violence protest even after knowing that non violent can never get independent. He was a curse to india.
@@ChandraChandra-ko8uk he was a agent of british, And what he gained because of it?😂 He gained title of father of nation and respect of foolish like you.
Nathuram Godse's last words : I shall be totally ruined, and the only thing I could expect from the people would be nothing but hatred… if I were to kill Gandhiji. But at the same time, I felt that Indian politics in the absence of Gandhiji would surely be proved practical, able to retaliate, and be powerful with armed forces.
Blame him, nothing bad about that, but do remember to blame ourselves, because we didn't sacrifice day and night to try and remove those problems ourselves as Indian patriots.
@@nilnull5457 tell me how many of his bones were broken. Every time he initiates a riot. As soon as the police van comes he is the first person to runaway to seek shelter in that van... And you call that sacrifice ..
All the idiots who are saying Patel should have been pm. He himself supported nehru for the pm post, Patel's deteriorating health and old age played a big role in that. Not only that Patel worshipped Gandhi ji, so don't try to put differences between the two so many years after there death. Respect them please
I am a bengali and inside our homes we were very practical about Gandhi as Noone actually reverred him..we are till date saddened how Netaji was sidelined and ultimately suppressed. One of my dear teachers told us that when Netaji came in the picture Gandhi had no place to hide as he.lost terribly consecutively in the INC elections...netaji won with greatest majority..Gandhi secured 2 votes...but this is not mentioned in our history books. Also Netajis idea of seeking independence was looked down upon and never supported. We lost such great people in the name of Gandhi nehru and their pacifying ideologies and actions.
@@manojatri6267 u can't trust the historians those who have manipulated our past ...may b it was a gimmick to show to the generations to come tht Bose also respected Gandhi & all ..coz even Ambedkar's views on Gandhi are straight away deleted from text books especially Abt how Gandhi supported the genocide of Hindus though Ambedkar himself disliked hindus ...
Gandhi,s candidate Surendranath lost election to Pattabhi as president o Congress, and same Pattabhi was instrumental in dedicating his single vote to Nehru to make PM at the request of Gandhi then Kripalani and others also followed thus nil vote man got elected against majority vote candidate Patel. Hence my question is should India celebrate Independence Day which brings into the memories that India was under British Rule
Even patel said the crowd has come for jawahar... so those days they were all understanding each other...there was no any enmity like.. ofcourse lot of opinion differences....finally some one has to prevail... Even if patel had become PM we would be telling now that Nehru would have been better and all that.
@@wendell.dacosta There were more statues during British times squeezing Indian money. Patel never ever built statues. He built our nation by uniting 100s Of samasthanams into a single unit. Another thing.. I am not against Nehru...all our leaders were great...only since 15 20 years Congress is in mess with too much corruption and family control.
Even since my childhood when we were taught about Indian history I wondered how Gandhi wasn't tortured or killed by Britishers like they did to other freedom fighters. Definitely there was something fishy. I never considered he and his ways gave us freedom
because when you torture a leader of a mass revolt it gets ugly ,,, especailly when the leader is not advocating a violent protest ,, ask thomas weber and what he said about dharasana ,, its human nature to be violent agianst the face of suppression but its even more out of nature for extremists to do that ,, its almost inhumane for them ,,
@@harshkumarf4379 he didn't become leader of masses overnight right. And British were very smart and cunning. They could easily identify his growing popularity and could have stopped it right there
Just like Congress could have stopped Narendra Modi way before he became popular.. There is something fishy about Narendra Modi.. It was not a defeat of congress. It was just a transfer of power from one set of crooks to another set of crooks..
hypocrite ??? he was not the one writing apology letters to british ,, he was not the one pushing the two nation theory ,, he was not the one aggaravating riots in which both hindus and muslims were killed and raped ,,, a two faced man will never write abotu his experiments which to any normal human beings soudns so pervert ,, even his supporters wanted him to not write such stuff ,,, you know what two faced people do ,, they conduct sexual acts and hide it all the while acting as if spiritual gurus ,, they dont write about how we should expsoe oursleves to our darkest desire if there is any ,, neither you nor me nor anyone else have that level of honesty ,,
@@harshkumarf4379 yes, he wrote about his sexual adventures. But did he write that in the internal elections if the Congress for the pst of PM ,all the votes went to Sardar Patel . Yet he insisted on Nehru becoming the PM. Did he write that he told the cold and shivering refugess who had come from Pakistan after witnessing nightmarish scenes to go wherever they wanted. This was in the winter of 1947-48 . Gandhi was ensconced comfortably in GD Birla's palatial Bungalow. I can tell you a lot more ,a lot ,but I don't have the time or the inclination. If you don't know history completely , don't post juvenile stuff .
Gandhi was a British agent. Remote control for the British and danced to their tunes keeping Indians totally in dark. That's the reason the real freedom fighter's were sidelined and Gandhi was kept in the limelight.
@@philipeisenberg6984 mr Phil by any chance if you are south African... Then you're the one to be blamed. Your folks should've waited and kicked him when the train crosses some rough terrain...
Why do we still have him on our currency notes. We need Maharana Pratap, Shivaji maharaj and Subhash on our notes. We should write to our governments and RBI.
@@pianoforme122 I think that's why our current govt launced UPI system. Nowadays we don't hv to see or use notes of his picture , atleast in majority of places .
When I was kid I had heard my grand father and his friends debating many things mentioned by Abhijit. Many of then were actually taken part in freedom struggle. I still remember my grand mother describing how Hippocate Gandhi was.
My grandfather was in the British Indian army and subsequently in the Independent Indian army. Whenever he heard that gandhi brought freedom he used to have a good laugh and tell us about the naval revolt .
@@winstonbachan8372 SORR......... GANDHI UNITED PEOPLE BUT NEVER GAVE FREEDOM😁. BRITIST LEFT INDIA BECAUSE OD INA(of subhash chandra bose ) no problem if your history is week , mine was also
I always wondered why we Indians alone begged the "Independence" in the name of non-violence. The minority appeasement and Hindu bashing by our political leaders are the continuation of that same "non-violence" legacy.
@@arpankhanna9934 Netaji can't be Gumnami baba for sure, the lion of a man, the strong willed person can't stay hidden as a baba, a fisghter always remain a fighter and would never live a obscured life.
@@kamalchakraborty6026 these were also my initial thoughts but after looking the kind of response a murti of neta ji got from some sections of the society and outsiders after 70 years of the case , i am convinced that it was right decision taken by neta ji to go underground
@@milesahead9183 Yes, and if Netaji had returned in public, the tussle between Gandhiwaadis and Netaji supporters would have surely turned violent. They wouldn't have allowed him to function. And the govt already had given the war criminal tag and extradition treaties. So the western world would have demanded his handover, if the govt doesn't comply they probably would have imposed sanctions. And that india is not today's india, people would have simply died of hunger on the streets. Innocent public would have gotten in between the crossfire. Also, going covert doesn't mean not doing anything, Gumnaami baba claims to have done fantastic things on the global level.
There was never Independence of India it just a Transfer of Power from British to Anti-Hindu and Anti-India Congress Party of Gandhi and Nehru, Leftists, and Communists.
You should have studied more before making inferences and assumptions about Gandhi. Can you name one great man of history or present era who could appeal to all, could be an ideal father, son, husband, leader, friend, brother, professional or a good Samaritan all d time❓🤷 Gandhi was a human being, so he was supposed to have certain weaknesses. But his merits outnumber his shortcomings. He came to India in 1915, left congress in 1934, went solo in demanding arms license for self defense for Indians from Britishers. Nehru mocked his demand. But Nehru also knew his ability to move d masses.... so when Gandhi declared that congress should be dissolved for paving way for a healthy democracy, Nehru n Maulana Got him killed d same day he was about to express his wish in a public meeting after prayers. Many articles, letters and notes claimed by historians as originally written by Gandhi are fake. British know what to sell in d name of Gandhi. When did Gandhi say that offer another cheek after getting a slap on d first one?
@@meenakumar4741 Please explain why Gandhi was Father of Anti-Hindu and Muslim appeasement Politics in India for which we Hindu are suffering Jihadi Terrorism everywhere in India ? Why he justified millions of Hindus Genocide during Partition to appease who ? Why he supported Khilafat Movement ? He was a mentor of Nawab Nehru who followed Gandhi's Anti-Hindu politics, and etc.
@@htnaku4947 as I said, plz read n research before you jump to conclusions. There were muslims in Kerala long before Gandhi was born. Infact Gandhi's खिलाफत आंदोलन was hijacked n twisted into ख़लीफ़ायत आंदोलन by muslim league. Gandhi had to drop it instantly so that a wrong message is prevented from spreading among Hindus. In chaos of that time, where there was no social media. It was difficult for a leader to convey d right strategy, change of plans and even to refute instantly when someone quotes him erroneously. That's why people like Maulana n Nehru took control posing to be Gandhi's spokesmen, n spread rumours of him being pro-muslims, because this is what they wanted him to be. Gandhi didn't rise to fame by wearing expensive cloths n living a rich lifestyle, like all congressies, but he lived with d masses... poor, tortured n discriminated against.
It's really disappointing as well as saddening that the person whom we studied and thought to be the ultimate freedom fighter and a leader was actually on the side of the oppressors, he always promoted ahinsa but when it came to Britishers, he never beleived in ahinsa, this is so shocking , thanks Abhijit sir for this understanding.
Gandhi was like a pressure cooker. While many freedom fighters wanted an armed resistance against the British, Gandhi wanted so called 'ahimsa'. So the British promoted Gandhi, so that Indian Independence movement is non violent so that British can squash it easily. Why did British execute Bhagat Singh? they could've easily done it with Gandhi too. But they were smart, they didnt, because Gandhi made the independence movement non violent, which realistically and objectively speaking made it weak. Gandhi failed because he could not prevent partition. He did not force Britain to leave India against their will. Britain had extreme bankruptcy from WW2. They could not afford to maintain their hold over India. Also, during this time, Subhash Chandra Bose's Indian army had become 40,000 to 50,000 strong. The British knew that if they had to deal with an army of 100,000 plus people, they would not be able to maintain their hold on India. Since, Britain at that time, could not have such a large stationed army in India. Gandhi removed Bose from Congress party presidency, made a crook like Nehru the prime minister, could not prevent partition, forced India to give Pakistan some reparation money after partition as well. I think Gandhi was nothing more than an idealistic fool who did not realize the national building requires ruthlessness. Along with that, 1947 was a great time to send Indian Muslims to Pakistan. I'm not saying this because of religion, I'm saying this because if all Muslims had left India, then India would have 200 million less people today, more resources per capita, more water per capita, more internal security, higher literacy rate, higher GDP per capita, more religious harmony. Pakistan sent all Hindus here, but we did not do anything. Along with this, At the partition, South Asia had about 77% Hindus, and about 23% Muslims roughly speaking. If you take the area of India and divide it by the area of South Asia (India + Pakistan + Bangladesh), you'll get about 78% or so. So India was meant to be only for Hindus, as that's how the resource division would have been optimal. But India added Muslims too, meaning that Pakistan had more resources per capita, and India had fewer resources per capita. India is still suffering today due to the lala-land 'idealism' of Gandhi. If you want to get something in life, you have to be ruthless, smart, tactical. Sitting around like Gandhi with so called 'ideals' gets you nothing but suffering. I just wish Hindus had a sharp leader like Jinnah to represent them. I view Jinnah as a villian, but he is nothing less than a messiah for Muslims due to his sharp wit. I hope that another Jinnah is born, but this time, this Jinnah works for Hindus. And I sincerely hope that a Gandhi is born in Pakistan, so that he can make them weaker.
In my perspective....he did an amazing job in first 10-15 years........But then he was fooled by Britishers and some Congress leaders like Nehru and also the Jinnah to an extent that he damaged our country himself to much extent. His death was necesary by the hands of Nathuram Godse. but that doesn't make Godse some great person either anyways. This was all just sad reality.
Also Gandhi stopping those people who fights against jinna's killing army in bengal but in opposite side he saying nothing .. In short he stopping self defence and giving them more opportunities
Gandhi is the best example of Saattwik Ego and a bundle of lies. His appeasement of Muslims was unmatched. The self proclaimed Baapu and Chaachu should be disowned by our nation. Their blunders are enormous.
There is nothing Sattwik about this person. Its about the quality of people in general these days, anyone wears an orange robe and meditates becomes a sadhu. I'm not sure with that standard, how would we rate Ravan or Hiranyakashipu? they meditated for 1000 years! This faker Gandhi may he rott in hell for eternity with his whole clan of rascals
More than that, he is a good speaker. Many have knowledge but not everyone can convey it efficiently. Only pro level readers would know that he isn’t actually speaking but writing. His speaking style and vocabulary indicate that. He is like listening to a book like audible app.
While i deeply admire Godse and his ethics, i feel he made Gandhi a martyr. He should have been demolished in some other way. Alas now we have to live with his idiot face staring at us from everywherw
@@neerajrawat9213 funny thing is ur parents would have got their education and jobs during congress rule. Your parents probably got their education in schools built by Congress. Funny
@@And_Cuts please watch jai sai deepak and Anand sir Ranga sir specially ask whom would think should be the role model he said I believe Bal gangadhar tilak be my role model he understand indic civilisation better than other populist leader like Ambedkar as well please search sai deepak launching his book with Ranga Sir
Why only one leader? It can be many on different denomination. Just people should not fight over lower or higher denomination assigned to their favorite leader
How can a Nation that has been there for many many thousands of yrs manage to get a Father of the Nation only in the 20th century? How can an individual who seldom advocated complete independence be the Father of the Nation? How can an individual who was the co-architect of Partition of India (helping the Pakistan cause in both active and passive ways) be the Father of the Nation?
It's very disturbing how Gandhi and Nehru hijacked the whole movement and post independence it was just naked power grabbing......... British puppets to say the least
@@vinay__1606 Bose ki to koi aur baat nahi mani Congress ne. In fact Bose ko erase karneki har koshish ki..... but they conveniently & specifically cherry-picked this one line that Bose had said over Radio to seek support of the masses in the Indian mainland. Bill padh diya Bose pe par ......reality is that they used it only coz it would suit their own "dedi hume azadi...kharg bina dhaal" narrative.
I ,as an Indian patriot, is sighing with relief that Modiji is in power…..I am from the Northeast .Narendra Modi speaks for the whole Bharath nation.Modiji has made me proud to be an Indian! Bharat Mata aur Modiji ki jai !!
One more fun fact. I have stayed for couple of years in South Africa. Nobody talks about Gandhi. And we taught here that he started the freedom fight from SA. What a joke
@@chandanmohanty9526 Those giving commentary today are they were there? Talking about it ...What difference will it make to your karma or Gandhiji's karma? Or knowing about the good and bad karmas of even our parents? They did the best at that point of time. We are not judges appointed for them. A man whose final words at his life's final moments of 'hey Ram' has made him a Muslim 🤣🤣🤣 then what else can convince the ill-thinkers? Ultimately each one of us are answerable to our own actions so let's be more concerned with what we sow in our lifetime.
Since childhood, I was never a big fan of Nehru or Gandhi!!! Coz the visuals said it all… However, the school textbooks always portrayed them great (as it was distorted) ; later when I started non-textbook readings esp about Lal,Bal,Pal, Sardar Patel, Netaji etc I was very clear who our real freedom fighters were!!!
The thing I hate about the books is that they don't say enough about Lal Bal Pal and not even once did I read about them in detail from the curriculum books...Not even once the books mention about the greatness and sacrifices of Young nationalists like bhagat Singh, Rajguru, Sukhdev, Chandrashekhar aazaad, Khudiram bose, Sardar Udham Singh, and so many more.... But what the books did not forget to mention is the appreciation of Brits.... Like the telephone line and railways....which in my opinion were the farthest thing from development... They just introduced it all to make it easier to exploit India...
Where did you people find the real history.. When one speak about real history, one should give evidence to support it and the evidence should be examined properly by experts.. Just because one guy comes out and simply accuse Gandhi without giving any proofs doesn't make it real history..
@@pradeepkumarak3892 Read the writings of Gandhi himself, he has been very frank about most things, also the letters he wrote, & the people who corresponded with him at the time. You get a clear picture
@@harshkumarf4379 bhai pehle dekhle thik se kon aadmi he.. Abhijit ek theoretical physicist,historian,technologist aur writer he esse hi usne kuch assumptions banake nahi bol diya.. pehle jaanlo baad me bolo kisi insaan k baare md aur backgrounds me jo books he wo sajavaat k liye nahi he and he knows historyway more than you..
Bro Gandhi may b wrong at many places.. But overall he did non violent protests, told Satyamev jayate.. He lived a simple life unlike today's politicians.. He fought for the freedom bro.. At least let's be grateful to all freedom fighters including Gandhi.. He was a human being too just like us.. So some wrong decisions are possible.. But unlike us leaning on our couches and watching TV those days do and night they made protests, fought in the streets, organised people, had meetings many gave sacrifices.. Gandhi too died due to political reasons.. Overall those people weren't seeking the comfort that we enjoy selfishly today.. He could have earned and got a car and lived a life of comfort as he was barrister himself.. They sacrificed their life ND lifestyle for the nation... How many of us would leave our education, leave our profession ND livelihood for the nation??? At least they did so let's learn to be grateful.. Criticising is much easier.. He at least organised all people throughout India.. There has been fight for freedom always but never could be possible.. But he organised and lot of regions AnD people came together and so the British had to leave and we r enjoying now.. I don't say he is God but I feel he doesn't deserve criticism... Unlike Nehru and Jinnah he wasn't selfish.. He didn't want to be the pm or president or want posts.. He is happy that India got independent and sad that there had to partition...and if he was a bad person.. How did the contemporary leaders starting from Lal bahadur shstri , sardar Patel, chidambaram and everyone else respect his word..... What would he gain being an agent of British, he wasn't behind riches or political power... Don't Create false castles..
I watched the American movie "Ghandi" after seeing your discussion. You guys are right. Ghandi was so loyal to the British empire. In fact he didn't want independence. He just wanted a higher rank in the racist world order of his time. What a disgusting fellow he was.. He definitely does not represent my value system.
Ghandy father of the nation .. Zina sorry jinnah step father of the nation Nehru maamu of the nation. (you may differ and say cha-cha in south he is maamu) Indira mother of the nation Sonia replacement to mother of the nation.
Well as a matter of fact, No.. he's not father of the nation. Article 18 of Indian constitution prohibits that. Hence government of India never conferred Gandhi with any such title. Informally he's addressed as father of nation. People say that Bose called him so in a speech in radio... I'm not 100 percent sure though because it was audio and not video.
There could never be father of bharat, as we call it motherland. We could just be sons and daughters of the motherland never Greater or equivalent to it. Jai hind!
We were aware of misdeeds of Gandhi and nehru. Unfortunately we were not allowed to discuss about them. I knew about these for last sixty years. We should be grateful to sir Nathuram Godse.
Congress Party under Nehru and Indira and their comrades hid the real history thoroughly and showed a history of their own liking. From 1947, education ministry and later educators inJNU like institutions were not under patriotic persons.
I was so happy today naturam godse was trending on twitter , today he shot gandhi and I am glad people are changing there are people who know the truth
BJP wants to be 'politically right' in the matter of Gandhi. Or else, self-centric & unpatriotic opposition, not minding the national interests, will stir the emotions of public against the true nationalists that may, in course of time, cause mass upheaval to dethrone a patriotic government formed after several decades of struggle against evil forces.
@@s.jagannathan3013 True , your viewpoint about BJP's present approach.....on this issue. But slowly slowly as the correct awareness spreads within the larger population of Bharat we should recognize contribution of other Flawless , Selfless Sacrifices of True Freedom Fighters like Subhash, Bhagat Singh, Lala lajpat rai, Chandrasekhar., Veer Sawarkar...... And start recognizing Correct as Correct and wrong as wrong...... We should come out of the false picture & claim of Congress Portraying itself as True and the only Patriotic Party & devoid them (Congress) of false patronage they are claiming for Independence... True picture of congress ancestors, lineage and present leaders is very self-centric, cruel, toxic...except few good leaders like Sardar Patel, Lal bahadur Shastri, P V Narsimha Rao etc .... which congress lineage itself has sidelined... It is hightime we as the Bharatiya Nationalist Citizens ,understand , learn , get aware about the history correctly from all viewpoint and correct the mistake of past and present false ongoing legacy which our forefathers have wrongly followed.... And henceforth act wisely with foresightedness, firmness & righteousness... without getting trapped in malicious, propogandist intention of few insiders and outsiders.....as in past... And working towards uplifting of Nation , Stability, Peace , harmony, humanity..... 🌹🙏 There is Saying : जैसा राजा वैसी प्रजा और जैसी प्रजा वैसा राजा। It implies it is equally responsibility of citizen to be smart, have awareness, participation in electing procedure, be noble , generous, visionary , righteous, present the balanced-rightful-modest needs to Government while electing the Government so as to have Government and Leader of Equal Virtues and Qualities... Leaders and the General Nation's public Should both move Side By Side , Step By Step in progressive direction for overall nations prosperity. 🌹🇮🇳🙏
what do u read ??? Ncert🤣🤣🤣🤣 We read history u read ncert Everyone knows gandhi Nehru follower blabbers a lot but but wait I can provide u with some 20 facts which will prove these Gandhi's and Nehru British servants
Kudos to Abhijith sir for speaking out. I follow him. His knowledge base just amazes me. The first time when I had watched Bhagat Singh's movie the scene where Gandhi Ji never fought for the lives of the 3 freedom fighters raised questions in my mind as a kid. Such disheartening tale.
@@Chakravartin58 so what do you expect from a non-violence supporter, you think he should have pick up his stick and beat the british?? For the first time British govt. wanted to made pact with Congress. Still Gandhiji took the risk of postponing Bhagat Singh's death. Moreover you should know that Bhagat Singh himself wanted to die, that's why he himself surrendered to British. His main motive was to spread the knowledge of on-lethal bombing through his final statement in court through the newspaper. Otherwise British govt. could not caught Bhagat Singh after Lahore incident. He fled to Calcutta and their surrendered for the assembly bomb case.
@@itsme6461 he was a coward thats all his non violence bs was main cause of delaying of independence even after independence congress idiots destroyed our nation he was a no mahatma but a politician who wants power nothing else
M.K.Gandhi was a well planted British controlled educated ordinary (almost poor) Indian man. British trained him in S.A and brought him back in India to counter the Lokmany Tilak's roars of complete freedom. It was British who made his image and made him larger than life personality to control through his glamour the Hindu's anger and will of complete freedom. Question is why Gandhi accepted this job? Answer lies in to general truth that every man or woman has a weakness. Gandhi's weakness was his attraction to sexuality. Unike a true saint or social reformer, he loved to be having skin touch of only women all the times. His so called image gave him opportunity to do it in public and no body dared to raise a finger or object it. That was possible because British didn't allow anybody to even think of him from that angle. Thanks to citti who brought in a debate like this.
you do know that lokmanya tilak also supported british ,, wrote an apology letter ,, katju has called him a british stooge as well ,, and you knwo the best thing about skin touches by women ,,, a person who has exceptional political power , and acts as a spiritual guru or a a ascetic nationalist leader will never write about his sexual experiments in a book and make it available for people to read ,,, can you think why ??? why did congressmen wanted him to not publish it ????
@@mukundk1233 well let's not bring OSHO in it becuase the things that he has done is ntohing to be proud of ,,, a fake spiritual guru enjoying all the wealth and money or perhaps even touches of the women ,,,
@@harshkumarf4379 Osho was a Fake Spiritual Guru. Dont do your own narratives. where and which Vedas has told that Gurus should not have luxury etc.. So dont do your own stories.
Translate this in all Indian languages We are really shattered and confused They Painted Gandhi, as a God Was really हे was a tool by British Lokmanya's death and Gandhi rise
Bro Gandhi may b wrong at many places.. But overall he did non violent protests, told Satyamev jayate.. He lived a simple life unlike today's politicians.. He fought for the freedom bro.. At least let's be grateful to all freedom fighters including Gandhi.. He was a human being too just like us.. So some wrong decisions are possible.. But unlike us leaning on our couches and watching TV those days do and night they made protests, fought in the streets, organised people, had meetings many gave sacrifices.. Gandhi too died due to political reasons.. Overall those people weren't seeking the comfort that we enjoy selfishly today.. He could have earned and got a car and lived a life of comfort as he was barrister himself.. They sacrificed their life ND lifestyle for the nation... How many of us would leave our education, leave our profession ND livelihood for the nation??? At least they did so let's learn to be grateful.. Criticising is much easier.. He at least organised all people throughout India.. There has been fight for freedom always but never could be possible.. But he organised and lot of regions AnD people came together and so the British had to leave and we r enjoying now.. I don't say he is God but I feel he doesn't deserve criticism... Unlike Nehru and Jinnah he wasn't selfish.. He didn't want to be the pm or president or want posts.. He is happy that India got independent and sad that there had to partition...and if he was a bad person.. How did the contemporary leaders starting from Lal bahadur shstri , sardar Patel, chidambaram and everyone else respect his word..... What would he gain being an agent of British, he wasn't behind riches or political power... Don't Create false castles..
he was an andhnamazi, who said muslims after killing hindus, will form a better india🤡 Pakistan or Partition of India. Dr. BR Ambedkar. Chapter 7, part 4, para 2
Such an eye opener growing up and even during my 20s I always wondered why we were divided up by the British. I now have a clear reason as to why. We got a transfer of powers from one set of crooks to another. Is the Indian congress party still a tool for the British?
As a school student, I was always taught how great Gandhi was and I believed it without question because I assumed that elders always teach you the truth (also I was very naive). Gradually I came to read about Gandhi, Nehru and other admired leaders and I happened to come across Gandhi's 'social' experiments it was not only shocking but it angered me to think that people kept on putting him on a pedestal despite knowing his truth.
The way India's cultural traditions values were meticulously ruined every sensible indian could feel the mental problem characterless massive scam by nehru Indira Rajiv Sanjay looted rajmata Gayatri Devi jewels that these are the worst enemies of Bharat
The saddest part is that we have been taught only FILTERED OR DISTORTED HISTORY, by the chamchaagiri historians. The other side of Ghandhi was conveniently buried under the carpet. But as they say TRUTH will come out one day.
19 th May, Godse's birthday should be celebrated as Godse Jayanthi- an honest and brave man who saved India from the clutches of an egotistical two faced demon called Gandhi
He is not only responsible for our Independence but we have got our independence by the dedication and sacrifice of many unsung heroes and heroines who are actually responsible for the same.
@@rajking647 In my opinion,it should remains as it is....as it is beneficial to the image of India. His name still serves some diplomatic purposes(for things like Ahimsa etc.) Those who want to know,they will know on their own....coz these shameful things are not worth including in children's textbooks. But his political stances should always be questioned in the History books.like what he did to Bhagat Singh,Sardar Patel etc. Jai Hind
I can't express how disgusted I'm feeling now about Gandhi after I watched this video, I heard fragments of similar sorts quite a while but never had a chance to comprehend the gruesome acts that he committed under the Vail of being a "Mahatma".... I'm sure that I'm not gonna use this term for him ever.... Many thanks to Abhijit for being so transparent and brave for putting this....
Don no how still they could manipulate us by saying mohandas gandhi as Mahathma... This is what the truth is..... more ppl should start talking about this... really loved it ❤️ thnq abhijeeth sir
Thanks for revealing Gandhi's mentality towards Hindus, Jews and young girls. When will our nation show courage to face the truth, that's the question as most of his deeds and thoughts are well documented beyond doubt.
I can't tolerate the shit like - "If you get slapped then show the opposite side cheek." I have all admirations towards Netaji Bose/sardar Patel/dr Ambedkar.
On a personal level, this maybe applicable somewhere. Remember it says, 'show your other cheek'. But on a political level its foolishness. You do what is needed there. Saam, daam, danda, bheda are names of such tools. Where things can work with discussion do that. Where money is useful, do that. Where creating discord (similar to divide and rule) is useful, do that. And where violence is useful do that. We always tend to see politics as bad. But in its real form, where its actually used for benefit of the people, that's good. Gandhi's thing was he mixed the personal with the public sphere. That's some kind of delusion.
Brother, I am proud of you. When there are thousands of idiots and imbeciles blindly calling an imposter and hypocrite "Mahatma" and mad after his mad preachings, people like you are the light of hope. I have studied Mohandas Gandhi in depth and I agree with every word of yours. Godspeed unto you!
Bharat has been through more than 1000 years of darkness…Bharat has existed for millenia…The situation we are in today is for me to see, the greatest challenge our ancient civilisation has faced…at times everything seems so dark and hopeless…yet somehow I refuse to believe that this is what will lead to our demise…I deeply feel that Bharat will once again attain its lost glory once a certain number of sanatanis become aware and will reignite the spirit of kshatriya dharm…🇮🇳❤️🙏🏽❤️🇮🇳
Don't be obsessed with country or person you belong to. We come alone and leave alone with our own choices. We will not be held accountable for any other's choices.
The poor Manu Ben died at the very young age due to the mental torture she had gone through with Gandhi. Many years ago when I first read about Gandhi's experiment of "Practising Celibacy "at the plum age of 72 with young naked girls ,I was shocked. Now this video clearly talks about the predator side of Gandhi. Thanks to the gentleman Mr.Abhijit. I heard that Gandhi's wife wrote a book in Gujarathi or in Hindi ,accusing Ghandhi for many more things . I am not very sure ,this is true or not . Do anyone have clue?
Not true...ghandi practice celibacy, to be able to fast for days and the strength he had, he was a follower of the Gita......its easy to blame him now that you have a good life,🇺🇸p.s I'm not indian🇮🇱❤🇸🇦
@@freddykrueger8759 of course,he was a follower of Gita.....but he did foolish acts. As Indians ,we are thankful to him for the positive things he did for the country,but he was knowingly or unknowingly responsible for a number of things which could be easily avoided . And unfortunately,those issues are such issues which are still relevant to this date.😔it is a sad reality.
Was a good conversation which brings out the real Gandhi that most Indians either do not know or don't want to know. However, it was very sad that, nothing was spoken about the injustice meted out by Gandhi and Nehru towards Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose who was the only one to fight against Britishers with all his heart, soul and might in as much organized way as possible. It was only due to Netaji and his armys efforts that after 2nd world war was over, a mutiny on a large scale erupted in the British controlled Indian Army and Navy. This was the time when even after being victorious in 2nd world war; the Britishers realized that it would now be untenable to rule India and within 2 and half years of winning the 2nd world war, they decided to flee from India with their head held high after ruling the country for about 200 years. This the real story or background of how and when India was given freedom. It's high time that, India stops Gandhi worshipping. Along with Jinnah it was also due to Gandhi and Nehru that we have this mess called Pakistan beside us. If we think deeply and unbiasedly then we will realize that, if Pakistan wouldn't have been created; there would have been no terrorism in the Indian sub continent. So, till date directly or indirectly all civilians and men in uniform(Army, Navy and Air Force) that India have lost while fighting terrorism and Pakistan are due to Gandhi and Nehru. Gandhi was responsible exactly for those acts for which he should never be called the Bapu(Father of the nation). He couldn't keep his children(India and Pakistan) united and staying under the same roof. Gandhi was a person not to be praised, respected and revered; rather he should have been executed in public after serving a lifetime sentence.
oh i knew ,, i knew itfor almost a decade now but this guy did'tn told you the entire truth and his inference is illogical jsut like how he said that chengiz khan did not attack india becuase he saw our plight in the face of brutal islamic rule and he did not wanted us to suffer more ,,,,,
Would like to see all public institutions, properties, Schemes, roads, Awards, etc. Named after Nehru, Gandhi , pseudo Gandhis to be renamed. Enough of these anti-national lot's names.
I have learnt the fact of So called Mahatma is nothing but the Maharakshas or Monster against Indi. Thank you so much for your enlightenment of Facts ❣️💐🙏
I never believed Gandhi as Mahatma even in school days. He was an smart politician who never had a courage to confront British power so he always compromised whether it is in Africa or in non-cooperation withdrawal or in khilafat movement or praising islamic fundamentalism to divide india with Britishers.
What power have you confronted? Gandhi didn't believe in confronting power on it's own terms. Both from a moral /ethical point of view (as a matter of [religious] principle) but also simply from a pragmatic and strategic pov. It had already been done for decades in India and failed. BTW, have you ever heard of Martin Luther King? He also lacked courage, and afraid to confront power, yes?? ...say it! You absolute ignorant bell-end
It seems to me that some Indian nationalists today resent the British for leaving without giving them a glorious liberation war and masses of independence martyrs to mythologise. They feel emasculated as a result and blame Gandhi for letting the British leave with some dignity.
Gandhi apni biwi ko Peet ta tha what non violence Mahatma giri is this nehru ne kamla nehru ka antim sanskar Tak nahi kiya netaji ne kiya kamla nehru ka antim sanskar Sanjay Gandhi was not the son of firoz gandhi Khan his father was mohmmad yunus khan What a badchalan family
Abhijit sir hats off to u!!Having guts to called Gandhi monster really indicates you have something!!!what a guy u r in past 3 days I saw more than 10 podcast ,interviews of yours.And every thing which this person claims he already clarify that you can check online. Such an educated ,well-read person he is
OMG, I never thought about this, Abhijit gave an insight. Gandhi was parachuted to India by British so that they can deal with entire India using a small handle called MK Gandhi. In fact, Dr. Ambedkar and OSHO spoke extensively about Gandhi and his emptiness. There were huge flaw in the way he approached freedom movement. It was disaster, matchless violence in the time of partition was actually because of MK Gandhi. Please read up Baba Saheb and OSHO on Gandhi.
Thanks for reverse engineering the facts behind a cleverly orchestrated and over-marketed brand, with such clarity and precision. This is the only way to dismantle the lies we've been fed over the years.
History 😀 book's 📚📖📚 need to re-write in present day's 🔥🙏👍 Don't argue on comment section 🧐 about that is happen or he is great 🙄 History is History 😳😒🤨 learn from history & make our universe great 😃 ...
@@nd1749 We lost our fighting spirit for a long period of time in history. We turned submissive more and more due to the nonviolence movement and turned cowardice. Thank god, our Army is strong and Gandhi did not asked the free Indian government to dismantle it.
Very enlightening interview! 👍 I wished you would also had discussed how Gandhiji suppressed the voice of the Dalits and literally forced Ambedkar to sign the Poona Pact which Ambedkar regretted for the rest of his life. He only called them “Harijan” only in the name, unlike Ambedkar and the other social reformers who dedicated their lives to the social cause of our nation. Your discussion of him being a racist reminded me of this incidence.
To release this video on a Gandhi Jayanthi day requires guts . Kudos to your team and Abhijit sir
It's after 2014 only we started debating such subjects publicly. 👍
.. also thanks to social media for giving ordinary ppl a platform for the voicing of their opinions.
Exactly 💯 true
Ambedkar said that Gandhi was not a Mahatma....
OSHO told Gandhi was worst politician of the world 🌎
MOST SENSIBLE INTELLECT are Sai Deepak, Dr. Anand Ranganathan, Ajit Doval, Abhijit Chavda, Annamalai, Pushpendra, Subramaniam Swamy,
Yogi, Himata Biswas Sharma , Major Gaurav Arya. Vinod (String) , Sadhguru, Sri Sri RaviShankar, Ramdev , etc.
Dangerous People are Sharad Pawar, Owaisi, Zakir Naik, Shashi Tharoor, RAM CHANDRA GUHA, Tehseen poonawalla, Azam Khan, Rana Ayub,
Stalin, MamthaBanerjee, Dhruv Rathee, Alka Lamba, Arundatti Roy, Few Bollywood Stars, Naseeruddin shah, Javed Akthar, Shabana Azmi, Mahesh Bhat, Tanmay Bhatt, Prannoy Roy, Kanhaiya Kumar, Umar Khalid, Geelani, Farooq Abdulla n Son , Yasin malic, Hardik Patel, John Dayal, Rajdeep SarDesai, Nidhi Razdan, BHARKHA DUTT, Ravish Kumar, etc.
We are in good times now....but long way to go
I always wondered why Gandhi was so sympathetic to Islam and the Khilafat movement. Thank you Abhijit, for explaining about his upbringing in the Pranami sect. Now I have a clearer understanding.
Tagore was also from Pirali sect who are considered semi muslim.
@@GauravKumar-xe1oi that is why sharmila married pataudi
@@Chandu-lb4lu Ask Tagore. He was from pirali sect and the sect is considered semi muslim. These are historical facts. Read any good book.
@@GauravKumar-xe1oi Pirali is not a sect. Pirali Brahmins are a lineage of Bengali Kulin Brahmins one of whose ancestors converted to Islam and got renamed to Pir Ali, because that was the only way he could marry the Muslim woman he wanted to marry (as far as I remember). Later that person wanted to revert to Dharma, but not only was he not accepted by other Kulin Brahmins in the area - his entire extended family/clan was outcasted. All their descendants came to be known as Pirali Brahmins to distinguish them from other Brahmin clans.
If india's independence was to hv bn won through militant resistance you wouldnt have a india today. It would have faced stateswise conflicts and would have had to deal with a much bigger challenge. Even now you are not able to bring the country under one umbrella.
My grandfather used to tell us about these evil character of Gnadhi 20-25 years back.
& he is absolutely right about Gandhi.
What a coincidence. My grandpa too was so critical of gandy and his policies. He disliked gandy immensely and would tell us stories about the other great men who were more worthy and nationalistic.
Your GF must had been in RSS clan...
See he would never have read about any personality...
It was the knowledge shared as Chinese whisper in the RSS shakha....
You will realise that sooner or later that Gandhi only did what anyone as a mediator would do , listen to British also get them to hear...
@@shredder2cop he was a British plant in lndian politics, they had to portray him big n benevolent and sometimes tweak him here and there. The Chinese whisper is what was whispered through the ears of innocent naive Indians by British plants that gandy is great and Indians believed that narrative. Sergeant gandy was an evil as even Ambedkar had narrated to BBC. Gandy was just furthering British interests in India and he stole the ideas of Lala Lajpat Rai and other freedom warriors but made them non violent just like British wanted. He made the Indian Hindus napunsak by telling them not to use force against the aggressors. What gandy did to this nation cannot be healed for centuries, he must be in dozhakh for his acts.
@@shredder2cop shred yourself up because you deserve that!!
@@S0S0ant1 do you realise what you say....
Not sure if you have any particular writer from history in mind who has coined this theory where Ghandhi was a British stooge...
Gandhi was educated. A Barrister by profession ..
He was also a Brahmin....and he came from a family with high values...
Are you sure of what you said both him and Nehru were Brahmins ....
Wise people with family values....they had everything but they left it.
They could have worked in UK too all their lives...
I don't think you are indian only else would you understand what is it to assassinate the character of a Brahmin.
My friends: Indians should read and understand Gandhi .
Me : reading "him" more makes me more anti gandhi.
True. Exposed !!!!
So True!
ghandy ke alawa phule, ambedkar, periyar aur ram mohan rai aur tagore ka baare mein Bhi padho. Aaj ke logon ko angrezi kutta, nanga samaaj, aur DHARMA Virodhi banane mein Bhi Inhi chakkon ka Haath hain.
@@dikshantnirwan7350 periyar mat bolo. He was a womanizer and that fellow was like sadak ka gunda during those days .. They portray him as some champion of oppressed . But in reality he did treat them like shit. Other stories were alai were loomed. And as a crown jewel both dmk and that fella have did a forgery by claiming that he was awarded by the UNESCO as the Socrates of south east asia.
@@வெற்றிவேல்முருகன்-ங8ழ do you know that He burn Ramayana Chaupaaiyan and so many things against SANATAN DHARMA ! Even in today's world people's of many countries think gandhi was Mahatma, but In reality they didn't know the Arth of Mahatma Shabd which is only used for Param Tapaswi and Bhagwan. Even Mahatma is one of the 108 names of Mahavir Hanuman. And if you think he was a womanizer then ram mohan rai was also a womanizer but they does all these things against SANATAN DHARMA. Visit Hindu Café channel regarding for SATI PRATHA. And please open up your eyes soon otherwise it will be too late.
I used to celebrate Gandhi Jayanti because of our history books in school curriculum. But after knowing the truth, I celebrate Shastri Jayanti 🙏🇮🇳
Those books were promoted by muslim educational ministers of Khangress party
do you like marathas
Bro Gandhi may b wrong at many places.. But overall he did non violent protests, told Satyamev jayate.. He lived a simple life unlike today's politicians.. He fought for the freedom bro.. At least let's be grateful to all freedom fighters including Gandhi.. He was a human being too just like us.. So some wrong decisions are possible.. But unlike us leaning on our couches and watching TV those days do and night they made protests, fought in the streets, organised people, had meetings many gave sacrifices.. Gandhi too died due to political reasons.. Overall those people weren't seeking the comfort that we enjoy selfishly today.. He could have earned and got a car and lived a life of comfort as he was barrister himself.. They sacrificed their life ND lifestyle for the nation... How many of us would leave our education, leave our profession ND livelihood for the nation??? At least they did so let's learn to be grateful.. Criticising is much easier.. He at least organised all people throughout India..
There has been fight for freedom always but never could be possible..
But he organised and lot of regions AnD people came together and so the British had to leave and we r enjoying now.. I don't say he is God but I feel he doesn't deserve criticism... Unlike Nehru and Jinnah he wasn't selfish.. He didn't want to be the pm or president or want posts.. He is happy that India got independent and sad that there had to partition...and if he was a bad person.. How did the contemporary leaders starting from Lal bahadur shstri , sardar Patel, chidambaram and everyone else respect his word.....
What would he gain being an agent of British, he wasn't behind riches or political power... Don't Create false castles..
@@ChandraChandra-ko8uk he was a puppet of British, he delayed India's independence not fought for it. He has done not a single work for indians. He do non violence protest even after knowing that non violent can never get independent. He was a curse to india.
@@ChandraChandra-ko8uk he was a agent of british,
And what he gained because of it?😂
He gained title of father of nation and respect of foolish like you.
Nathuram Godse's last words :
I shall be totally ruined, and the only thing I could expect from the people would be nothing but hatred… if I were to kill Gandhiji. But at the same time, I felt that Indian politics in the absence of Gandhiji would surely be proved practical, able to retaliate, and be powerful with armed forces.
He was the real life Itachi!
True
He just killed an old man what a brave fellow wow! 😂
@@dysplasiaanaplasia4128 No! Its more than that. He sacrificed himself for the betterment of our country.
@@dysplasiaanaplasia4128 he killed old monster
He secrificed himself for country, what did he get by killing
No wonder my grandfather used to get angry while reading about gandhi in my history book... My grandfather's exact words "woh mahatama nhi tha"
You are so great full !!!
why did i get shivers just reading the words "wo mahatma nhi tha", even though ive firmly believed this to be true for almost a decade at this point ?
Now I understand why my grandfather would resort to silence and shy away whenever I asked him about Gandhi and/or pre independence era.
Exactly what my Grandpa says even now...his teen years was during the 1940s to 1960s
Exactly , Same was the case with my Grand Parents. The people of that generation knew the truth .
Gandhi is highly overrated....I blame him for my problems today in india
Blame him, nothing bad about that, but do remember to blame ourselves, because we didn't sacrifice day and night to try and remove those problems ourselves as Indian patriots.
@@nilnull5457 yes exactly
YES
@@nilnull5457 tell me how many of his bones were broken. Every time he initiates a riot. As soon as the police van comes he is the first person to runaway to seek shelter in that van... And you call that sacrifice ..
May lord shiva pardon all you people for denigrating our true intelligent nonviolent freedom fighters.
Sardar Patel being the first PM
That alone would have significantly changed the course of modern India
he cannot become the first PM because he died before the first general elections ,,,
All the idiots who are saying Patel should have been pm. He himself supported nehru for the pm post, Patel's deteriorating health and old age played a big role in that. Not only that Patel worshipped Gandhi ji, so don't try to put differences between the two so many years after there death. Respect them please
Very correctly said, his not being the PM changed our prospect. nehru would not have been our PM if not for this man.
ruclips.net/video/lLL8jwdZmLE/видео.html
Sardar Patel lived only for Two Years Since Independence. SO NEHRU''s Seection was a Better Choice.
Gandhi was Father of Anti-Hindu and Muslim Appeasement Politics in India.
Exactly 👍👍
Noo
@@123YADHU yes ..
He is father of PAKISTHAN, not INDIA.
@@balakrishnamurthy619 Perfect answer
I am a bengali and inside our homes we were very practical about Gandhi as Noone actually reverred him..we are till date saddened how Netaji was sidelined and ultimately suppressed. One of my dear teachers told us that when Netaji came in the picture Gandhi had no place to hide as he.lost terribly consecutively in the INC elections...netaji won with greatest majority..Gandhi secured 2 votes...but this is not mentioned in our history books. Also Netajis idea of seeking independence was looked down upon and never supported. We lost such great people in the name of Gandhi nehru and their pacifying ideologies and actions.
Tell me why Netaji gave term like BAPU to Gandhi and why were two brigades of INA were named after Nehru and Gandhi....
Well bengalis were the same who hated the man Subash Chandra bose more than anyone else could.
@@manojatri6267 u can't trust the historians those who have manipulated our past ...may b it was a gimmick to show to the generations to come tht Bose also respected Gandhi & all ..coz even Ambedkar's views on Gandhi are straight away deleted from text books especially Abt how Gandhi supported the genocide of Hindus though Ambedkar himself disliked hindus ...
Gandhi Nehru are traitors
Gandhi,s candidate Surendranath lost election to Pattabhi as president o Congress, and same Pattabhi was instrumental in dedicating his single vote to Nehru to make PM at the request of Gandhi then Kripalani and others also followed thus nil vote man got elected against majority vote candidate Patel. Hence my question is should India celebrate Independence Day which brings into the memories that India was under British Rule
He didn't let Patel be the first prime minister even after voting
Even patel said the crowd has come for jawahar...
so those days they were all understanding each other...there was no any enmity like..
ofcourse lot of opinion differences....finally some one has to prevail...
Even if patel had become PM we would be telling now that Nehru would have been better and all that.
Patel was dead before 1953 elections. Get your facts right!
@@arkodeepdutta1324
But the PM post came much before that.
@@wendell.dacosta
Certainly the kind of Kashmir problems prolonging since 70 years and associated terrorism would not be there.
@@wendell.dacosta
There were more statues during British times squeezing Indian money.
Patel never ever built statues.
He built our nation by uniting 100s
Of samasthanams into a single unit.
Another thing.. I am not against Nehru...all our leaders were great...only since
15 20 years Congress is in mess with too much corruption
and family control.
Even since my childhood when we were taught about Indian history I wondered how Gandhi wasn't tortured or killed by Britishers like they did to other freedom fighters. Definitely there was something fishy. I never considered he and his ways gave us freedom
Egzactly
because when you torture a leader of a mass revolt it gets ugly ,,, especailly when the leader is not advocating a violent protest ,, ask thomas weber and what he said about dharasana ,, its human nature to be violent agianst the face of suppression but its even more out of nature for extremists to do that ,, its almost inhumane for them ,,
there was nothing fishy we just want it to be fishy as it will give the ideological push to a politcal narrative ,,
@@harshkumarf4379 he didn't become leader of masses overnight right. And British were very smart and cunning. They could easily identify his growing popularity and could have stopped it right there
Just like Congress could have stopped Narendra Modi way before he became popular.. There is something fishy about Narendra Modi.. It was not a defeat of congress. It was just a transfer of power from one set of crooks to another set of crooks..
The word ' hypocrite' was coined for M K Gandhi. Intellectually ,politically , spirituality and sexually ,a two faced man.
hypocrite ??? he was not the one writing apology letters to british ,, he was not the one pushing the two nation theory ,, he was not the one aggaravating riots in which both hindus and muslims were killed and raped ,,, a two faced man will never write abotu his experiments which to any normal human beings soudns so pervert ,, even his supporters wanted him to not write such stuff ,,, you know what two faced people do ,, they conduct sexual acts and hide it all the while acting as if spiritual gurus ,, they dont write about how we should expsoe oursleves to our darkest desire if there is any ,, neither you nor me nor anyone else have that level of honesty ,,
@@harshkumarf4379 ..Ghandi was like Mohammed of Islam..
@@harshkumarf4379 yes, he wrote about his sexual adventures. But did he write that in the internal elections if the Congress for the pst of PM ,all the votes went to Sardar Patel . Yet he insisted on Nehru becoming the PM. Did he write that he told the cold and shivering refugess who had come from Pakistan after witnessing nightmarish scenes to go wherever they wanted. This was in the winter of 1947-48 . Gandhi was ensconced comfortably in GD Birla's palatial Bungalow. I can tell you a lot more ,a lot ,but I don't have the time or the inclination. If you don't know history completely , don't post juvenile stuff .
A dying man at his final moments doesn't utter the word 3 times that he doesn't value- 'hey ram'
Every man and every woman has two face black and white.
Its high time that we educate people on Gandhiji ' s conspiracy
Gandhi was a British agent. Remote control for the British and danced to their tunes keeping Indians totally in dark. That's the reason the real freedom fighter's were sidelined and Gandhi was kept in the limelight.
MKG was an agent for the 'gwaza-e-Hind' too.
@@philipeisenberg6984 mr Phil by any chance if you are south African... Then you're the one to be blamed. Your folks should've waited and kicked him when the train crosses some rough terrain...
Gandhi's teachings resonated with the British as he reminded them of Jesus's teachings.
A dying man at his final moments doesn't utter the word 3 times that he doesn't value- 'hey ram'
Indian politics are always dirty the dirtiest ones on the planet! With two engines you have 20 opinion 🤔
Why do we still have him on our currency notes. We need Maharana Pratap, Shivaji maharaj and Subhash on our notes. We should write to our governments and RBI.
having a picture on the Currency is horrible Karma. its better we dont have great heroes on currency notes..else we should have no picture on Curreny
@@pianoforme122 I think that's why our current govt launced UPI system. Nowadays we don't hv to see or use notes of his picture , atleast in majority of places .
@@shubhamarya5824 woah that was such a witty observation.
@@shubhamarya5824 👍😀
@@shubhamarya5824 😮 good point
When I was kid I had heard my grand father and his friends debating many things mentioned by Abhijit. Many of then were actually taken part in freedom struggle. I still remember my grand mother describing how Hippocate Gandhi was.
And gandi's congress is now doing the samething
My grandfather was in the British Indian army and subsequently in the Independent Indian army. Whenever he heard that gandhi brought freedom he used to have a good laugh and tell us about the naval revolt .
Wherever There is five Indians there are 20 opinions 😁 Gandhi give your grandfather the freedom to laugh, at his old nonsense 😂
@@winstonbachan8372 SORR......... GANDHI UNITED PEOPLE BUT NEVER GAVE FREEDOM😁.
BRITIST LEFT INDIA BECAUSE OD INA(of subhash chandra bose )
no problem if your history is week , mine was also
@@winstonbachan8372 yes gandhi ran his charkha at full speed and hence british were blown away
I always wondered why we Indians alone begged the "Independence" in the name of non-violence. The minority appeasement and Hindu bashing by our political leaders are the continuation of that same "non-violence" legacy.
Absolutely
Gandhi and Nehru destroyed India. My father's family were Gandhians and hence this surname I hate.
...aren't there some legal steps available for changing your surname to your liking..?
@@philipeisenberg6984 yes, there are.
@@anupmohandas1021, Change your name to Anup Subhash Chandra. There are simple ways to do it if your consult a legal expert.
@@anupmohandas1021 or change it to Anup Savarkar 😎😅
Yesss we all were ignorant for so long ... we all were fooled by English stooges...
Megalomaniac monster Mohandas Mohammad Gandhi is not the father of my nation Bharatha.
Savarkar and bose are my idols.
I wish we had Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose alive during independence and as the first prime minister of India .
Bro, explore about gumnam baba you would get an interesting knowledge
@@arpankhanna9934 Netaji can't be Gumnami baba for sure, the lion of a man, the strong willed person can't stay hidden as a baba, a fisghter always remain a fighter and would never live a obscured life.
@@kamalchakraborty6026 these were also my initial thoughts
but after looking the kind of response a murti of neta ji got from some sections of the society and outsiders after 70 years of the case , i am convinced that it was right decision taken by neta ji to go underground
@@renisingh2834 Yeah you are right
And congress was never going to welcome him
@@milesahead9183 Yes, and if Netaji had returned in public, the tussle between Gandhiwaadis and Netaji supporters would have surely turned violent.
They wouldn't have allowed him to function. And the govt already had given the war criminal tag and extradition treaties.
So the western world would have demanded his handover, if the govt doesn't comply they probably would have imposed sanctions. And that india is not today's india, people would have simply died of hunger on the streets. Innocent public would have gotten in between the crossfire.
Also, going covert doesn't mean not doing anything, Gumnaami baba claims to have done fantastic things on the global level.
Truth always prevails.. it took more than 70 years but people are now seeing the reality..
today is "Laal Bahadoor Shashtri jayanti" 🙏🚩🔱🤗😊
This is the true Mahatma...LBS 🙏🙏
Now that is a day and the person to venerate. Nehru and Gandhi were bad for India.
LAL BAHADUR SHASTRI AMAR RAHE
yes... who smashed pakistan to pulp....Jai Jawan Jai Kisan..
Gandhi vs Ambedkar key debates
ruclips.net/video/Of8nLHzy-Mo/видео.html
Nice, finally someone has the guts to speak against this so-called "Mahatma". Great job.
There was never Independence of India it just a Transfer of Power from British to Anti-Hindu and Anti-India Congress Party of Gandhi and Nehru, Leftists, and Communists.
U r absolutrly right 👍
so?? we're now enslaved by the very people that make a charade of getting elected. so who's at fault here?
You should have studied more before making inferences and assumptions about Gandhi.
Can you name one great man of history or present era who could appeal to all, could be an ideal father, son, husband, leader, friend, brother, professional or a good Samaritan all d time❓🤷
Gandhi was a human being, so he was supposed to have certain weaknesses. But his merits outnumber his shortcomings.
He came to India in 1915, left congress in 1934, went solo in demanding arms license for self defense for Indians from Britishers. Nehru mocked his demand.
But Nehru also knew his ability to move d masses.... so when Gandhi declared that congress should be dissolved for paving way for a healthy democracy, Nehru n Maulana Got him killed d same day he was about to express his wish in a public meeting after prayers.
Many articles, letters and notes claimed by historians as originally written by Gandhi are fake. British know what to sell in d name of Gandhi.
When did Gandhi say that offer another cheek after getting a slap on d first one?
@@meenakumar4741 Please explain why Gandhi was Father of Anti-Hindu and Muslim appeasement Politics in India for which we Hindu are suffering Jihadi Terrorism everywhere in India ? Why he justified millions of Hindus Genocide during Partition to appease who ? Why he supported Khilafat Movement ? He was a mentor of Nawab Nehru who followed Gandhi's Anti-Hindu politics, and etc.
@@htnaku4947 as I said, plz read n research before you jump to conclusions.
There were muslims in Kerala long before Gandhi was born. Infact Gandhi's खिलाफत आंदोलन was hijacked n twisted into ख़लीफ़ायत आंदोलन by muslim league. Gandhi had to drop it instantly so that a wrong message is prevented from spreading among Hindus.
In chaos of that time, where there was no social media. It was difficult for a leader to convey d right strategy, change of plans and even to refute instantly when someone quotes him erroneously.
That's why people like Maulana n Nehru took control posing to be Gandhi's spokesmen, n spread rumours of him being pro-muslims, because this is what they wanted him to be.
Gandhi didn't rise to fame by wearing expensive cloths n living a rich lifestyle, like all congressies, but he lived with d masses... poor, tortured n discriminated against.
The way Abhijit utters "Mahatma' wins my heart!!!🤣🤣🤣🤣
I feel like a fool thinking about Gandhi as some kind of hero.Thanks for sharing the truth
His son converted to muslim
It's really disappointing as well as saddening that the person whom we studied and thought to be the ultimate freedom fighter and a leader was actually on the side of the oppressors, he always promoted ahinsa but when it came to Britishers, he never beleived in ahinsa, this is so shocking , thanks Abhijit sir for this understanding.
Gandhi was like a pressure cooker. While many freedom fighters wanted an armed resistance against the British, Gandhi wanted so called 'ahimsa'. So the British promoted Gandhi, so that Indian Independence movement is non violent so that British can squash it easily. Why did British execute Bhagat Singh? they could've easily done it with Gandhi too. But they were smart, they didnt, because Gandhi made the independence movement non violent, which realistically and objectively speaking made it weak.
Gandhi failed because he could not prevent partition. He did not force Britain to leave India against their will. Britain had extreme bankruptcy from WW2. They could not afford to maintain their hold over India. Also, during this time, Subhash Chandra Bose's Indian army had become 40,000 to 50,000 strong. The British knew that if they had to deal with an army of 100,000 plus people, they would not be able to maintain their hold on India. Since, Britain at that time, could not have such a large stationed army in India.
Gandhi removed Bose from Congress party presidency, made a crook like Nehru the prime minister, could not prevent partition, forced India to give Pakistan some reparation money after partition as well. I think Gandhi was nothing more than an idealistic fool who did not realize the national building requires ruthlessness.
Along with that, 1947 was a great time to send Indian Muslims to Pakistan. I'm not saying this because of religion, I'm saying this because if all Muslims had left India, then India would have 200 million less people today, more resources per capita, more water per capita, more internal security, higher literacy rate, higher GDP per capita, more religious harmony. Pakistan sent all Hindus here, but we did not do anything.
Along with this, At the partition, South Asia had about 77% Hindus, and about 23% Muslims roughly speaking. If you take the area of India and divide it by the area of South Asia (India + Pakistan + Bangladesh), you'll get about 78% or so. So India was meant to be only for Hindus, as that's how the resource division would have been optimal. But India added Muslims too, meaning that Pakistan had more resources per capita, and India had fewer resources per capita.
India is still suffering today due to the lala-land 'idealism' of Gandhi. If you want to get something in life, you have to be ruthless, smart, tactical. Sitting around like Gandhi with so called 'ideals' gets you nothing but suffering.
I just wish Hindus had a sharp leader like Jinnah to represent them. I view Jinnah as a villian, but he is nothing less than a messiah for Muslims due to his sharp wit. I hope that another Jinnah is born, but this time, this Jinnah works for Hindus. And I sincerely hope that a Gandhi is born in Pakistan, so that he can make them weaker.
In my perspective....he did an amazing job in first 10-15 years........But then he was fooled by Britishers and some Congress leaders like Nehru and also the Jinnah to an extent that he damaged our country himself to much extent.
His death was necesary by the hands of Nathuram Godse.
but that doesn't make Godse some great person either anyways.
This was all just sad reality.
@@galaxray8700 yeah might be true 👍
pure example of a person portraying best of initial part of Kali Yuga.
Also Gandhi stopping those people who fights against jinna's killing army in bengal but in opposite side he saying nothing ..
In short he stopping self defence and giving them more opportunities
Gandhi is the best example of Saattwik Ego and a bundle of lies. His appeasement of Muslims was unmatched. The self proclaimed Baapu and Chaachu should be disowned by our nation. Their blunders are enormous.
There is nothing Sattwik about this person. Its about the quality of people in general these days, anyone wears an orange robe and meditates becomes a sadhu. I'm not sure with that standard, how would we rate Ravan or Hiranyakashipu? they meditated for 1000 years! This faker Gandhi may he rott in hell for eternity with his whole clan of rascals
Saatwik and Gandhi??? Joke!
Abhijit Chavda is a living encyclopedia 🔥
More than that, he is a good speaker. Many have knowledge but not everyone can convey it efficiently. Only pro level readers would know that he isn’t actually speaking
but writing. His speaking style and vocabulary indicate that. He is like listening to a book like audible app.
@@qeiejxdld6302 and fake stories
ENCYCLOPEDIA OF GARBAGE
He should at first discuss the role RSS during freedom struggle before cricizing Gandhiji
he speaks fairy tales
We are in debt of Nathuram Godse forever...he died so we are saved of evil of Gandhi....
While i deeply admire Godse and his ethics, i feel he made Gandhi a martyr. He should have been demolished in some other way. Alas now we have to live with his idiot face staring at us from everywherw
True
Gandhi was made a martyr. If he were alive, it is unthinkable what all would have happened still to the Hindus because of him.
I am sure all of you guys are unemployed pos
@@neerajrawat9213 funny thing is ur parents would have got their education and jobs during congress rule. Your parents probably got their education in schools built by Congress. Funny
We should remove Gandhi's face from our currency notes.
Ambedkar,Patel Bose also should be on currency notes
@@And_Cuts please watch jai sai deepak and Anand sir Ranga sir specially ask whom would think should be the role model he said I believe Bal gangadhar tilak be my role model he understand indic civilisation better than other populist leader like Ambedkar as well please search sai deepak launching his book with Ranga Sir
ruclips.net/video/XaztUu9oomA/видео.html
And from our memories
Why only one leader? It can be many on different denomination. Just people should not fight over lower or higher denomination assigned to their favorite leader
How can a Nation that has been there for many many thousands of yrs manage to get a Father of the Nation only in the 20th century?
How can an individual who seldom advocated complete independence be the Father of the Nation?
How can an individual who was the co-architect of Partition of India (helping the Pakistan cause in both active and passive ways) be the Father of the Nation?
It's very disturbing how Gandhi and Nehru hijacked the whole movement and post independence it was just naked power grabbing......... British puppets to say the least
These 2 gave away large parts of the country to Pakistan and then claim to get India its independence.
But sir what can we do...the title 'RashtraPita' was given by Subhash Chandra Bose. I think here he makes a mistake by giving such title.
@@vinay__1606 Bose ki to koi aur baat nahi mani Congress ne. In fact Bose ko erase karneki har koshish ki..... but they conveniently & specifically cherry-picked this one line that Bose had said over Radio to seek support of the masses in the Indian mainland.
Bill padh diya Bose pe par ......reality is that they used it only coz it would suit their own "dedi hume azadi...kharg bina dhaal" narrative.
🙏
Thank you Abhijit ji for openly speaking the truth. Yes its only after 2014 we are able to discuss the topic of Gandhi family openly. 👍
I ,as an Indian patriot, is sighing with relief that Modiji is in power…..I am from the Northeast .Narendra Modi speaks for the whole Bharath nation.Modiji has made me proud to be an Indian! Bharat Mata aur Modiji ki jai !!
2nd October is Lal Bahadur Shastriji's Jayanti...... ONLY
One more fun fact. I have stayed for couple of years in South Africa. Nobody talks about Gandhi. And we taught here that he started the freedom fight from SA. What a joke
yes ! modijji is more popular in the land of mandela, some say.
U look beautiful ❤️
A dying man at his final moments doesn't utter the word 3 times that he doesn't value- 'hey ram'
@@togetservi4342 who told you?? Were you there??
@@chandanmohanty9526
Those giving commentary today are they were there?
Talking about it ...What difference will it make to your karma or Gandhiji's karma?
Or knowing about the good and bad karmas of even our parents? They did the best at that point of time. We are not judges appointed for them.
A man whose final words at his life's final moments of 'hey Ram' has made him a Muslim 🤣🤣🤣 then what else can convince the ill-thinkers?
Ultimately each one of us are answerable to our own actions so let's be more concerned with what we sow in our lifetime.
My dad also used to express such views. But only within the family.
Since childhood, I was never a big fan of Nehru or Gandhi!!! Coz the visuals said it all… However, the school textbooks always portrayed them great (as it was distorted) ; later when I started non-textbook readings esp about Lal,Bal,Pal, Sardar Patel, Netaji etc I was very clear who our real freedom fighters were!!!
The thing I hate about the books is that they don't say enough about Lal Bal Pal and not even once did I read about them in detail from the curriculum books...Not even once the books mention about the greatness and sacrifices of Young nationalists like bhagat Singh, Rajguru, Sukhdev, Chandrashekhar aazaad, Khudiram bose, Sardar Udham Singh, and so many more.... But what the books did not forget to mention is the appreciation of Brits.... Like the telephone line and railways....which in my opinion were the farthest thing from development... They just introduced it all to make it easier to exploit India...
Very sad and angering for Indians. However historical and current truths have to be exposed.
Yes absolutely
indians shoudl read real history ,, this supposed expose is kind of like the one haq did in pakistan by transforming history into a narrative ,,,
Where did you people find the real history.. When one speak about real history, one should give evidence to support it and the evidence should be examined properly by experts.. Just because one guy comes out and simply accuse Gandhi without giving any proofs doesn't make it real history..
@@pradeepkumarak3892 Read the writings of Gandhi himself, he has been very frank about most things, also the letters he wrote, & the people who corresponded with him at the time. You get a clear picture
@@harshkumarf4379 bhai pehle dekhle thik se kon aadmi he.. Abhijit ek theoretical physicist,historian,technologist aur writer he esse hi usne kuch assumptions banake nahi bol diya.. pehle jaanlo baad me bolo kisi insaan k baare md aur backgrounds me jo books he wo sajavaat k liye nahi he and he knows historyway more than you..
Abhijeet sirs discussion was eye opening.Today more and more people are realising what the Congress and Gandhi did to this great nation.
Exactly 💯 true
Ambedkar said that Gandhi was not a Mahatma....
OSHO told Gandhi was worst politician of the world 🌎
Bro Gandhi may b wrong at many places.. But overall he did non violent protests, told Satyamev jayate.. He lived a simple life unlike today's politicians.. He fought for the freedom bro.. At least let's be grateful to all freedom fighters including Gandhi.. He was a human being too just like us.. So some wrong decisions are possible.. But unlike us leaning on our couches and watching TV those days do and night they made protests, fought in the streets, organised people, had meetings many gave sacrifices.. Gandhi too died due to political reasons.. Overall those people weren't seeking the comfort that we enjoy selfishly today.. He could have earned and got a car and lived a life of comfort as he was barrister himself.. They sacrificed their life ND lifestyle for the nation... How many of us would leave our education, leave our profession ND livelihood for the nation??? At least they did so let's learn to be grateful.. Criticising is much easier.. He at least organised all people throughout India..
There has been fight for freedom always but never could be possible..
But he organised and lot of regions AnD people came together and so the British had to leave and we r enjoying now.. I don't say he is God but I feel he doesn't deserve criticism... Unlike Nehru and Jinnah he wasn't selfish.. He didn't want to be the pm or president or want posts.. He is happy that India got independent and sad that there had to partition...and if he was a bad person.. How did the contemporary leaders starting from Lal bahadur shstri , sardar Patel, chidambaram and everyone else respect his word.....
What would he gain being an agent of British, he wasn't behind riches or political power... Don't Create false castles..
@@ChandraChandra-ko8uk He is good freedom fighter. But mot mahatma or father of nation. He doesn't deserve it
@@ChandraChandra-ko8uk Agreed with all his services to our nation but many didn't agree him as mahatma
....
I watched the American movie "Ghandi" after seeing your discussion. You guys are right.
Ghandi was so loyal to the British empire. In fact he didn't want independence. He just wanted a higher rank in the racist world order of his time.
What a disgusting fellow he was..
He definitely does not represent my value system.
😂😂😂 koi itna galat kaise ho sakta haiii
Is he a father of the nation? Ha Ha Ha. Rightly call him as betrayer or traitor of nation.
Biggest deception of the century: Ahimsha
Biggest humbug of the century: MKG
He's the father of the nation and it's true. It's just that the nation is pakistan and not India lol.
Ghandy father of the nation ..
Zina sorry jinnah step father of the nation
Nehru maamu of the nation. (you may differ and say cha-cha in south he is maamu)
Indira mother of the nation
Sonia replacement to mother of the nation.
Well as a matter of fact, No.. he's not father of the nation. Article 18 of Indian constitution prohibits that. Hence government of India never conferred Gandhi with any such title. Informally he's addressed as father of nation. People say that Bose called him so in a speech in radio... I'm not 100 percent sure though because it was audio and not video.
There could never be father of bharat, as we call it motherland. We could just be sons and daughters of the motherland never Greater or equivalent to it. Jai hind!
We were aware of misdeeds of Gandhi and nehru. Unfortunately we were not allowed to discuss about them. I knew about these for last sixty years. We should be grateful to sir Nathuram Godse.
Congress Party under Nehru and Indira and their comrades hid the real history thoroughly and showed a history of their own liking. From 1947, education ministry and later educators inJNU like institutions were not under patriotic persons.
I think Nathuram Godse killing MKG helped build his image even more.
I was so happy today naturam godse was trending on twitter , today he shot gandhi and I am glad people are changing there are people who know the truth
Sorry I am not grateful towards Godse.
We should not support violence
Note- I don't believe Gandhi ji is father of the nation.
@@r...1082 non violence is the first priority but violence over violence is Defence.
This truth needs to be spoken and spread more on social media. The mainstream media, television and even BJP refuses to speak against Gandhi.
BJP wants to be 'politically right' in the matter of Gandhi. Or else, self-centric & unpatriotic opposition, not minding the national interests, will stir the emotions of public against the true nationalists that may, in course of time, cause mass upheaval to dethrone a patriotic government formed after several decades of struggle against evil forces.
@@s.jagannathan3013 True , your viewpoint about BJP's present approach.....on this issue.
But slowly slowly as the correct awareness spreads within the larger population of Bharat we should recognize contribution of other Flawless , Selfless Sacrifices of True Freedom Fighters like Subhash, Bhagat Singh, Lala lajpat rai, Chandrasekhar., Veer Sawarkar......
And start recognizing Correct as Correct and wrong as wrong......
We should come out of the false picture & claim of Congress Portraying itself as True and the only Patriotic Party & devoid them (Congress) of false patronage they are claiming for Independence...
True picture of congress ancestors, lineage and present leaders is very self-centric, cruel, toxic...except few good leaders like Sardar Patel, Lal bahadur Shastri, P V Narsimha Rao etc ....
which congress lineage itself has sidelined...
It is hightime we as the Bharatiya Nationalist Citizens ,understand , learn , get aware about the history correctly from all viewpoint and correct the mistake of past and present false ongoing legacy which our forefathers have wrongly followed.... And henceforth act wisely with foresightedness, firmness & righteousness...
without getting trapped in malicious, propogandist intention of few insiders and outsiders.....as in past...
And
working towards uplifting of Nation , Stability, Peace , harmony, humanity..... 🌹🙏
There is Saying :
जैसा राजा वैसी प्रजा और
जैसी प्रजा वैसा राजा।
It implies it is equally responsibility of citizen to be smart, have awareness, participation in electing procedure, be noble , generous, visionary , righteous, present the balanced-rightful-modest needs to Government while electing the Government so as to have Government and Leader of Equal Virtues and Qualities...
Leaders and the General Nation's public Should both move Side By Side , Step By Step in progressive direction for overall nations prosperity. 🌹🇮🇳🙏
Bjp need to be taught lesson
Sadhavi pragya is from BJP.
@@s.mindia1485 And she spoke the truth about Gandhi
This video needs to be viewed by everyone… I request all share as much as u can …
Ghor kalyug!!! A age where demons are worshipped and saints are crucified.
Clear your brain by studying as much as this man has read... Just BLABERRING won't give you wisdom
😀.. true , can't correct them ,,
False and distorted history destroy a nation ,,
Gandhiji remains the greatest indian for nice people ,,🙏
what do u read ??? Ncert🤣🤣🤣🤣
We read history u read ncert
Everyone knows gandhi Nehru follower blabbers a lot but but wait I can provide u with some 20 facts which will prove these Gandhi's and Nehru British servants
Just because your political textbook said so?
Kudos to Abhijith sir for speaking out. I follow him. His knowledge base just amazes me. The first time when I had watched Bhagat Singh's movie the scene where Gandhi Ji never fought for the lives of the 3 freedom fighters raised questions in my mind as a kid. Such disheartening tale.
Knowledge is borrowed.
May not be true..
He tried to postpone their hanging, he also spoke against capital punishment.
@@itsme6461 he did not tried enough Gandhi ji is weird thats all i can say
@@Chakravartin58 so what do you expect from a non-violence supporter, you think he should have pick up his stick and beat the british?? For the first time British govt. wanted to made pact with Congress. Still Gandhiji took the risk of postponing Bhagat Singh's death. Moreover you should know that Bhagat Singh himself wanted to die, that's why he himself surrendered to British. His main motive was to spread the knowledge of on-lethal bombing through his final statement in court through the newspaper. Otherwise British govt. could not caught Bhagat Singh after Lahore incident. He fled to Calcutta and their surrendered for the assembly bomb case.
@@itsme6461 he was a coward thats all his non violence bs was main cause of delaying of independence even after independence congress idiots destroyed our nation he was a no mahatma but a politician who wants power nothing else
M.K.Gandhi was a well planted British controlled educated ordinary (almost poor) Indian man. British trained him in S.A and brought him back in India to counter the Lokmany Tilak's roars of complete freedom. It was British who made his image and made him larger than life personality to control through his glamour the Hindu's anger and will of complete freedom. Question is why Gandhi accepted this job? Answer lies in to general truth that every man or woman has a weakness. Gandhi's weakness was his attraction to sexuality. Unike a true saint or social reformer, he loved to be having skin touch of only women all the times. His so called image gave him opportunity to do it in public and no body dared to raise a finger or object it. That was possible because British didn't allow anybody to even think of him from that angle. Thanks to citti who brought in a debate like this.
Exactly 💯 true
Ambedkar said that Gandhi was not a Mahatma....
OSHO told Gandhi was worst politician of the world 🌎
you do know that lokmanya tilak also supported british ,, wrote an apology letter ,, katju has called him a british stooge as well ,, and you knwo the best thing about skin touches by women ,,, a person who has exceptional political power , and acts as a spiritual guru or a a ascetic nationalist leader will never write about his sexual experiments in a book and make it available for people to read ,,, can you think why ??? why did congressmen wanted him to not publish it ????
@@mukundk1233 well let's not bring OSHO in it becuase the things that he has done is ntohing to be proud of ,,, a fake spiritual guru enjoying all the wealth and money or perhaps even touches of the women ,,,
@@harshkumarf4379 Osho was a Fake Spiritual Guru. Dont do your own narratives. where and which Vedas has told that Gurus should not have luxury etc.. So dont do your own stories.
I can feel the resistance of abhijit sir that he is trying to be as calm and respectful while talking abt people who were such big hypocrites lmao
These very enlightening debates and discourses must be disseminated to all the Indians by subtitling (or dubbing) these in all the Indian languages.
Translate this in all Indian languages
We are really shattered and confused They Painted Gandhi, as a God
Was really हे was a tool by British
Lokmanya's death and Gandhi rise
These are propaganda online I could tell you I started the history
Should be disseminated worldwide
Bro Gandhi may b wrong at many places.. But overall he did non violent protests, told Satyamev jayate.. He lived a simple life unlike today's politicians.. He fought for the freedom bro.. At least let's be grateful to all freedom fighters including Gandhi.. He was a human being too just like us.. So some wrong decisions are possible.. But unlike us leaning on our couches and watching TV those days do and night they made protests, fought in the streets, organised people, had meetings many gave sacrifices.. Gandhi too died due to political reasons.. Overall those people weren't seeking the comfort that we enjoy selfishly today.. He could have earned and got a car and lived a life of comfort as he was barrister himself.. They sacrificed their life ND lifestyle for the nation... How many of us would leave our education, leave our profession ND livelihood for the nation??? At least they did so let's learn to be grateful.. Criticising is much easier.. He at least organised all people throughout India..
There has been fight for freedom always but never could be possible..
But he organised and lot of regions AnD people came together and so the British had to leave and we r enjoying now.. I don't say he is God but I feel he doesn't deserve criticism... Unlike Nehru and Jinnah he wasn't selfish.. He didn't want to be the pm or president or want posts.. He is happy that India got independent and sad that there had to partition...and if he was a bad person.. How did the contemporary leaders starting from Lal bahadur shstri , sardar Patel, chidambaram and everyone else respect his word.....
What would he gain being an agent of British, he wasn't behind riches or political power... Don't Create false castles..
A dying man at his final moments doesn't utter the word 3 times that he doesn't value- 'hey ram'
*Monster Gandhi Unmasked*
Thank you Chavda ji...
Gandhi was British agent. I've been investigating this for long time. N this podcast proves I'm not wrong. Thank you
Very true, his task was to keep the Indian population calm. The moment netaji turned the Indians in British army against British, the game was over.
he was an andhnamazi, who said muslims after killing hindus, will form a better india🤡
Pakistan or Partition of India. Dr. BR Ambedkar.
Chapter 7, part 4, para 2
Such an eye opener growing up and even during my 20s I always wondered why we were divided up by the British. I now have a clear reason as to why. We got a transfer of powers from one set of crooks to another. Is the Indian congress party still a tool for the British?
As a school student, I was always taught how great Gandhi was and I believed it without question because I assumed that elders always teach you the truth (also I was very naive). Gradually I came to read about Gandhi, Nehru and other admired leaders and I happened to come across Gandhi's 'social' experiments it was not only shocking but it angered me to think that people kept on putting him on a pedestal despite knowing his truth.
he has his own place in the indian freedom movement, but he definitely doesnt deserve the title of mahatma.
A dying man at his final moments doesn't utter the word 3 times that he doesn't value- 'hey ram'
The way India's cultural traditions values were meticulously ruined every sensible indian could feel the mental problem characterless massive scam by nehru Indira Rajiv Sanjay looted rajmata Gayatri Devi jewels that these are the worst enemies of Bharat
YOU have spoken the bitter truth.
@simple money You are brain washed. He stated facts about gandhi.
The saddest part is that we have been taught only FILTERED OR DISTORTED HISTORY, by the chamchaagiri historians. The other side of Ghandhi was conveniently buried under the carpet. But as they say TRUTH will come out one day.
@@raghunathansrinivasaraghav6455 A small correction, its not filtered history but the interpreted and manipulated history
A dying man at his final moments doesn't utter the word 3 times that he doesn't value- 'hey ram'
@@togetservi4342 I can also say "Hey Ram" and murder three individuals. Action speaks louder than words.
Gandhi is known as "Mahatma", and I don't know about maha, but right now he is definitely an atma thanks to Godse 😂😂
Super Super Bro🤣👌🤣
19 th May, Godse's birthday should be celebrated as Godse Jayanthi- an honest and brave man who saved India from the clutches of an egotistical two faced demon called Gandhi
@@SR-mv2mf I am ready to celebrate godse jayanti 🙂
*a cursed atma...
Godse is not near God though.. cause he is a murderer.
He is not only responsible for our Independence but we have got our independence by the dedication and sacrifice of many unsung heroes and heroines who are actually responsible for the same.
Great interview, the entire population should be re-educated about the true history of INDIA
Nonsense, go and read my coment here
@@rajking647 In my opinion,it should remains as it is....as it is beneficial to the image of India.
His name still serves some diplomatic purposes(for things like Ahimsa etc.)
Those who want to know,they will know on their own....coz these shameful things are not worth including in children's textbooks.
But his political stances should always be questioned in the History books.like what he did to Bhagat Singh,Sardar Patel etc.
Jai Hind
@@galaxray8700 what's the use of ahimsa? Nothing!
@@rajking647 why? Are you special?
True history. In which battle was the British defeated and took freedom?
I can't express how disgusted I'm feeling now about Gandhi after I watched this video, I heard fragments of similar sorts quite a while but never had a chance to comprehend the gruesome acts that he committed under the Vail of being a "Mahatma".... I'm sure that I'm not gonna use this term for him ever.... Many thanks to Abhijit for being so transparent and brave for putting this....
Gandhi was a Father of Anti-Hindu and Muslim Appeasement Politics in India.
Don no how still they could manipulate us by saying mohandas gandhi as Mahathma... This is what the truth is..... more ppl should start talking about this... really loved it ❤️ thnq abhijeeth sir
Thanks for revealing Gandhi's mentality towards Hindus, Jews and young girls. When will our nation show courage to face the truth, that's the question as most of his deeds and thoughts are well documented beyond doubt.
I can't tolerate the shit like -
"If you get slapped then show the opposite side cheek."
I have all admirations towards Netaji Bose/sardar Patel/dr Ambedkar.
Also "when they give you stone, give them flowers". Like no bro hit them with a wall.
On a personal level, this maybe applicable somewhere. Remember it says, 'show your other cheek'.
But on a political level its foolishness. You do what is needed there. Saam, daam, danda, bheda are names of such tools. Where things can work with discussion do that. Where money is useful, do that. Where creating discord (similar to divide and rule) is useful, do that. And where violence is useful do that.
We always tend to see politics as bad. But in its real form, where its actually used for benefit of the people, that's good.
Gandhi's thing was he mixed the personal with the public sphere. That's some kind of delusion.
This discussion should be widely circulated. Its an eye opener.
No, people would still disagree with him because they cannot bear logic.
A dying man at his final moments doesn't utter the word 3 times that he doesn't value- 'hey ram'
@@togetservi4342 No it is fake news , he never said it , congress propaganda
True,.
So thankful to you Abhjit Chavda, salute to you....
This might sound entirely irrelevant, but the female voice at the end is one of the most soothing voices I've ever heard.
Such topics should be debated and should be brought in front, publicly!
Brother, I am proud of you. When there are thousands of idiots and imbeciles blindly calling an imposter and hypocrite "Mahatma" and mad after his mad preachings, people like you are the light of hope. I have studied Mohandas Gandhi in depth and I agree with every word of yours. Godspeed unto you!
People count notes( currency) with their spit, that's why, Gandhi's picture is on the currency in India.
Got the answer? Indians.
I was feeling bad that our currency had his pics, now i feel better, thanks
Now i feel postive about this haha
I would never thought Gandhi would be questioned by indians.👍👍👍
Bharat has been through more than 1000 years of darkness…Bharat has existed for millenia…The situation we are in today is for me to see, the greatest challenge our ancient civilisation has faced…at times everything seems so dark and hopeless…yet somehow I refuse to believe that this is what will lead to our demise…I deeply feel that Bharat will once again attain its lost glory once a certain number of sanatanis become aware and will reignite the spirit of kshatriya dharm…🇮🇳❤️🙏🏽❤️🇮🇳
Absolutely Correct...
Don't be obsessed with country or person you belong to. We come alone and leave alone with our own choices.
We will not be held accountable for any other's choices.
Bro you are correct I heard that in 2036 planets are going to take positions like after Mahabharat war so sanatana Dharma is going to rise again
Very well summarized 🙏🕉
@@abhinayreddy6178 yes hindu vs muslim in india who want to capture india
Sarojini Naidu once said to keep Gandhi poor India exchequar had to cough off a fortune.
Yes. Her actual words were: "Ït takes a lot of money to keep him poor" (this is mentioned in Katherine Frank's biography of Indira Gandhi).
The poor Manu Ben died at the very young age due to the mental torture she had gone through with Gandhi. Many years ago when I first read about Gandhi's experiment of "Practising Celibacy "at the plum age of 72 with young naked girls ,I was shocked. Now this video clearly talks about the predator side of Gandhi. Thanks to the gentleman Mr.Abhijit. I heard that Gandhi's wife wrote a book in Gujarathi or in Hindi ,accusing Ghandhi for many more things . I am not very sure ,this is true or not . Do anyone have clue?
It's true
Biggest terrorist were nehru gandhi Indira
Where is that book now?
Not true...ghandi practice celibacy, to be able to fast for days and the strength he had, he was a follower of the Gita......its easy to blame him now that you have a good life,🇺🇸p.s I'm not indian🇮🇱❤🇸🇦
@@freddykrueger8759 of course,he was a follower of Gita.....but he did foolish acts.
As Indians ,we are thankful to him for the positive things he did for the country,but he was knowingly or unknowingly responsible for a number of things which could be easily avoided .
And unfortunately,those issues are such issues which are still relevant to this date.😔it is a sad reality.
This video topples my entire understanding of Indian history.
Was a good conversation which brings out the real Gandhi that most Indians either do not know or don't want to know. However, it was very sad that, nothing was spoken about the injustice meted out by Gandhi and Nehru towards Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose who was the only one to fight against Britishers with all his heart, soul and might in as much organized way as possible. It was only due to Netaji and his armys efforts that after 2nd world war was over, a mutiny on a large scale erupted in the British controlled Indian Army and Navy. This was the time when even after being victorious in 2nd world war; the Britishers realized that it would now be untenable to rule India and within 2 and half years of winning the 2nd world war, they decided to flee from India with their head held high after ruling the country for about 200 years. This the real story or background of how and when India was given freedom. It's high time that, India stops Gandhi worshipping. Along with Jinnah it was also due to Gandhi and Nehru that we have this mess called Pakistan beside us. If we think deeply and unbiasedly then we will realize that, if Pakistan wouldn't have been created; there would have been no terrorism in the Indian sub continent. So, till date directly or indirectly all civilians and men in uniform(Army, Navy and Air Force) that India have lost while fighting terrorism and Pakistan are due to Gandhi and Nehru. Gandhi was responsible exactly for those acts for which he should never be called the Bapu(Father of the nation). He couldn't keep his children(India and Pakistan) united and staying under the same roof. Gandhi was a person not to be praised, respected and revered; rather he should have been executed in public after serving a lifetime sentence.
Sandeep Nasipuri - 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
I am very sure Gandhi would be sentenced to suffer 1000 Rapes & 10000 Murders in his future lifes.
oh i knew ,, i knew itfor almost a decade now but this guy did'tn told you the entire truth and his inference is illogical jsut like how he said that chengiz khan did not attack india becuase he saw our plight in the face of brutal islamic rule and he did not wanted us to suffer more ,,,,,
A dying man at his final moments doesn't utter the word 3 times that he doesn't value- 'hey ram'
Would like to see all public institutions, properties, Schemes, roads, Awards, etc. Named after Nehru, Gandhi , pseudo Gandhis to be renamed. Enough of these anti-national lot's names.
Also their pictures removed from all offices and currencies and wherever else they are portrayed.
Moral of the story
No matter how much you try to hide
Time reveals it
Bar dancer Sonia said mein kisi se nahi darti mein Indira ki bahu hu both political whores
Well its the time in between that matters. No truth has any value past its expiry date.
@@alaypatel6050 r u not free in your mind by knowing this .. no need to listen this secular bullshit.... isnt it real freedom??
@@alaypatel6050You're wrong. The truth heals and develops
I have learnt the fact of So called Mahatma is nothing but the Maharakshas or Monster against Indi. Thank you so much for your enlightenment of Facts ❣️💐🙏
The truth cannot be hidden, itz out there for everyone to see, Thanks for bringing it up
Thanks for portraying the dark side of the gandhi coin. The nation should know.
I never believed Gandhi as Mahatma even in school days. He was an smart politician who never had a courage to confront British power so he always compromised whether it is in Africa or in non-cooperation withdrawal or in khilafat movement or praising islamic fundamentalism to divide india with Britishers.
Right
He was a sheep in a wolf skin ....
Do you hv any idea how powerful british empire was. Noone could ever beat them. Be realistic.
What power have you confronted?
Gandhi didn't believe in confronting power on it's own terms. Both from a moral /ethical point of view (as a matter of [religious] principle) but also simply from a pragmatic and strategic pov. It had already been done for decades in India and failed. BTW, have you ever heard of Martin Luther King? He also lacked courage, and afraid to confront power, yes?? ...say it! You absolute ignorant bell-end
@@dysplasiaanaplasia4128 lol so u feel non violence bet them??
Be realistic dude...u urself told how powerful British is.
It seems to me that some Indian nationalists today resent the British for leaving without giving them a glorious liberation war and masses of independence martyrs to mythologise. They feel emasculated as a result and blame Gandhi for letting the British leave with some dignity.
I always had a doubt that how this three legged man freed us from the British with so called Ahimsa ?
Today I got to know the truth.
Gandhi apni biwi ko Peet ta tha what non violence Mahatma giri is this nehru ne kamla nehru ka antim sanskar Tak nahi kiya netaji ne kiya kamla nehru ka antim sanskar
Sanjay Gandhi was not the son of firoz gandhi Khan his father was mohmmad yunus khan
What a badchalan family
Gandhi did have tonne of hobbies.. that would put him behind bars, if he did today
Gandhi was actually stooge of Brit.
Abhijit sir hats off to u!!Having guts to called Gandhi monster really indicates you have something!!!what a guy u r in past 3 days I saw more than 10 podcast ,interviews of yours.And every thing which this person claims he already clarify that you can check online. Such an educated ,well-read person he is
OMG, I never thought about this, Abhijit gave an insight. Gandhi was parachuted to India by British so that they can deal with entire India using a small handle called MK Gandhi. In fact, Dr. Ambedkar and OSHO spoke extensively about Gandhi and his emptiness. There were huge flaw in the way he approached freedom movement. It was disaster, matchless violence in the time of partition was actually because of MK Gandhi. Please read up Baba Saheb and OSHO on Gandhi.
Thanks for reverse engineering the facts behind a cleverly orchestrated and over-marketed brand, with such clarity and precision. This is the only way to dismantle the lies we've been fed over the years.
I never been an admirer of Gandhi and I have been a big admirer of Subhash Chandra Bose............
Are you a leftist bro?
Please dont say your a libranduo
How can he be libarando
If he's against gandhi
@@abhinav8522 SC Bose was extreme leftist
@@udaysingh1893 but a real patriot
EYE OPENNER FOR OUR COUNTRY !!! READ THIS WITHOUT FAIL...
Wow! Covered all the whitewashed sins in one short session with great eloquence.... salute to Abhijit sir🇮🇳
History 🤔 is very dengerous 😮😧🤫🤐😬😳🧐🤯🙄😓😨
We need balance ⚖️⚖️⚖️ in everything 🤔📙🧐
History 😀 book's 📚📖📚 need to re-write in present day's 🔥🙏👍
Don't argue on comment section 🧐 about that is happen or he is great 🙄
History is History 😳😒🤨 learn from history & make our universe great 😃 ...
I always thought Gandhi was a sale out .his teaching where not suited for the time
A very detailed, no-nonsense, backed by facts. Thank you, Abhijit!
Thank you for giving this totally new perspective. I appreciate your boldness.
09:56 Even khilafat movement is taught as Independence movement in school history books....
Non violence killed more people than violence could have They killed us we tolerate tolerate but why our fore fathers tolerate so much
@@nd1749 We lost our fighting spirit for a long period of time in history. We turned submissive more and more due to the nonviolence movement and turned cowardice. Thank god, our Army is strong and Gandhi did not asked the free Indian government to dismantle it.
Thank you for all these clear thoughts expressed. To date the Hindus are still docile because of this MKG. Congress followed his footsteps.
Very enlightening interview! 👍
I wished you would also had discussed how Gandhiji suppressed the voice of the Dalits and literally forced Ambedkar to sign the Poona Pact which Ambedkar regretted for the rest of his life. He only called them “Harijan” only in the name, unlike Ambedkar and the other social reformers who dedicated their lives to the social cause of our nation. Your discussion of him being a racist reminded me of this incidence.
Correct bro.
@@r...1082 GANDHI NEHRU WERE BRITISH AGENTS :: ANTI INDIAN
ANTI HINDU PRO
JIHADI MISSIONARIES:: HINDU KILLERS ::
there are many should come out like you Sir... great session, you have thrown a light on the hidden history