+KimJongBill I thought Kant thought that all perceived space is Euclidean? If space and time are a priori, then how can we discover empirically non Euclidean space?
Laurence BonJour argues that there can be a priori falsities. The identification of the a priori and the incorrigible is no more justified than the identification of the a priori and the analytic. These are categories that might coincide, but might conceivably not coincide.
This is a great point. There are many roads in life, some straight, some curved, some boulevards, and some dirt roads. They all have different things to offer and the more of these roads you travel down, the better picture you have of the entire place.
I personally prefer Kant to the Positivist. And although I find Wittgenstein interesting and valuable, I really don't get how we now (per Putnam) view synthetic apriories as entering into our experience through language instead of mind. The experience of time, space and causality surely is how our minds organize the sensory data it recieces. Granted we give names to these experiences and they enter our language that way... But still... The statement makes no sense to me.
3:00+ "we need a revisable synthetic apriori" yes & synthetic apperception apriori virtual classes boundaries within mirrors of biometric signaling into a frequency system of adaptation
The a priori can be wrong if it is applied to where it isn't meant to. Like Euclidean geometrical reasoning to curved space.
+KimJongBill I thought Kant thought that all perceived space is Euclidean? If space and time are a priori, then how can we discover empirically non Euclidean space?
Laurence BonJour argues that there can be a priori falsities.
The identification of the a priori and the incorrigible is no more justified than the identification of the a priori and the analytic. These are categories that might coincide, but might conceivably not coincide.
@Tom Myers No he didn't. This is just another example of you failing to process reality, Tom! Stop having the bong hit transplants you fucking schizo.
Merci pour la qualité de votre chaîne...Je la découvre 9 ans après mais il n'est jamais trop tard...Le bébé est toujours là !
I'm glad the algorithm kept pushing this one on me, as it is absolutely brilliant
@Corey Anton. Thanks! If you like it, please share it. More on the way. Thanks for the comment!
This is a great point. There are many roads in life, some straight, some curved, some boulevards, and some dirt roads. They all have different things to offer and the more of these roads you travel down, the better picture you have of the entire place.
ruclips.net/video/gKMKkjwVo0g/видео.html
Many thanks. Great clip.
Goodness all around , he will be missed
Putnam's like if you collided Elvis and Godel at the speed of light. Such a class act.
I personally prefer Kant to the Positivist. And although I find Wittgenstein interesting and valuable, I really don't get how we now (per Putnam) view synthetic apriories as entering into our experience through language instead of mind. The experience of time, space and causality surely is how our minds organize the sensory data it recieces. Granted we give names to these experiences and they enter our language that way... But still... The statement makes no sense to me.
1:11 OH MY GOD HANS REICHENBACH
gosh I love him so much
3:00+ "we need a revisable synthetic apriori" yes & synthetic apperception apriori virtual classes boundaries within mirrors of biometric signaling into a frequency system of adaptation
Karnak car hacks
Society has more or less done this with philosophy since the rise of Darwinism and we’re paying the price