Sir, thank you for your work, systematic teaching is really needed in our generation and I deeply appreciate and respect what you stand for...please don't stop, I'm learning deep things from you. (from South Africa)
Your studies are sorely needed in a day of such biblical ignorance. I will be following your teachings as i find it helps me to know why i believe what i believe. :)
There is no truth in these teaching don't take the doctrines of this man, read the bible for your self, he's butchering the words of God,we need both faith in Jesus Christ plus the commandments of God given to us by Moses in the scriptures of liviticus, having just one won't work we need both. Look at rev. 14:12 even rev.12:17 read them with a open mind for the truth and it will set you free, this man's doctrines will send you to HELL.
Amen and great teaching. I really think you are very respectfull, loving and gentle in your way to reach the Torah keeping people. I have heard and seen many onthers who make fun and speek in a disrespect tone and that is not loving as Jesus teaches us. So I really enjoy your videos and your loving way of teaching. Keep doing that. Don’t get down on the same sad level as others in here… It’s so sad How people forget to love eachother the same way as Jesus.. Jesus our savior bless you and your work ✝️🤗
Thank you, Liselotte! Peter says, "Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect" (1 Pet. 3:15). Blessings, Rob
Very good video. What I do like is your adding of some additional information and context surrounding the passage in Jeremiah. Too often, the focus is in Hebrews and misses some context. Unfortunately, as much as the added context is important and beneficial, I still feel it might lack in a couple area that the objectors will raise or will underlie in their presuppositions. First, more/additional context is needed establishing that Jesus has initiated/established the New Covenant (last supper). One objection I often hear is that Hebrew Roots believers say they believe all the Jeremiah prophecy is still in the future (not yet part of already but not yet nature of the Kingdom of God). Of course, they have to reinterpret or in some cases cast away what the author of Hebrews rights. Most often I see they arguing that Hebrews author is also speaking of future not present. They do the same with Isaiah's prophecy (some versus about the messiah and some about 2nd coming -- within same section). While it is true that some prophecy has a future and future-future sense, I don't believe Hebrews can be interpreted as all still in the future. The second, more subtle presupposition, is due to denial of Trinity, their is a lack of understanding of how Jesus has to be Yahweh otherwise his sacrifice could not have met the requirements of the law and fulfilled the punishment for sin so that our sins will be remembered no more. The believe that Jesus was a created agent and not God (Trinitarian view) leads to the believe that the New Covenant is still future also and why the Old Covenant is still in affect. This has been debated for centuries, but going back to an old recent debate, the debate with James White and Michael Brown had with a Sir Anthony Buzzard and Joseph Good on the Trinity really deals with the issues. Joseph Good is the foundational scholar that most of the current "elders" in the Hebrew Roots movement point to. Buzzard and Good's argumentation can be seen repeated in current modern debates like between Anthony Rodgers and Sean Griffin and the most recent between Andrew Schumacher and Sean Griffen. Sean basically is repeating the arguments (not as successfully) of Good and Buzzard. White's recent debate with Universalist Dale Tuggy covers similar grounds. The point being if the presupposition is anti-trinitarian, then what you presented here will not be believed. Your presentation here is very in depth but starts with a trinitarian and new covenant was established by Jesus position. It would be good to flesh out what those are solid underlying presuppositions.
"THE" in 9:26 KJV is the definite article added to the original text, mistranslated "the people" and "the prince". Without the definite article the correct interpretation reads "a prince". The antecedent is Messiah to the pro-form "HE" in 9:27. The week is Passion week not the 70th week. The 70th week is the "consummation" in 9:27 that is still to come. Grammatically the consummation goes back to 9:24 the original time specification. Dan. 9:27 reads "and HE (Messiah) shall confirm the covenant (Isa. 55:1-3) with the many (peoples, tongues, nations and kings) for one week (Passion week) and in the midst of the week (Wednesday\Thursday Passover) HE (Messiah) shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease (it is finished) and for overspreading of abominations (40 years of continued animal sacrifices) HE shall make it (Holy City) desolate (void of Daniel's people) even until the consummation (70th week) and that determined (time of the Gentiles) be poured upon the desolate (Gospel poured upon the children of the desolate; Isa. 54:1)".
idk if you interact with your comment section much but firstly, thank you! I've dealt w Hebrew Israelism (the much more aggressive, racist, hateful branch of Hebrew Roots Movement) for years and have refuted their teachings almost on my own studies the exact same way you do (nothing like a cult to make you read your bible), so I'm binging your content out of relief and joy haha. #Subscribed So far you've covered almost every important, common point that I personally have interacted with concerning Hebrew Israelites (HIs). I just have one request concerning Sabbath that I haven't found in your content yet...and that's certain claims & rationales Jesus uses when challenged on the sabbath. I'd just like your take on my thought process on the passage(s) and the passages themselves. Feel free to respond in the comments or make a vid; I'm here for it either way! God bless and shalom. The talking points are usually something like "Jesus never encouraged, hinted at, or broke sabbath day observance (or any Mosaic law). He didn't work on the sabbath, and if he 'broke' it, it was merely tradition he broke. If he did break one of God's laws he cannot be sinless". Lots of HIs are anti-tradition. ---In John 5, the offense seems to not lie in the healing but in the carrying of the bed. The man is "carrying a burden" which seems to be in direct opposition to Jer 17:21. Jesus ultimately gets confronted and his rationale/defense is the bc the Father is working he is working. "Working" is the same word as the LXX translates from Ex 20:10 "but the seventh day is a Sabbath to the LORD your God. On it you shall not do any work (ergon)". Jesus seems to be doing one the common patterns of intensifying the charge. His rationale essentially means "The Father is breaking the sabbath therefore I do to, bc I am equal with him" He seems to appeal to his deity to supersede the command (after all, YHWH issued it and is above it). Moreover he hints that the Father has BEEN working until this point in time, which, in my opinion, further implies the future sabbath rest with no end, spoken of in the creation account. --In Matt 12/Mark 2, it could be argued that the gathering of grain was similar to the breaking of Jer 17:21 and Neh 13:15, but I've heard it more in line with breaking Pharisaical tradition, so we can roll with that if you want. Jesus' response was that "David and those with him broke it and it was okay. The priests themselves work on the sabbath and it's okay. Both groups are guiltless." Many liken the disciples' being hungry and therefore eating plucking grain to David's starving and being chased situation to explain why Jesus is saying they can break the sabbath, which I feel are incongruent, in all honesty. It actually feels more like gathering stick to cook bc you're hungry than David's dire situation, in my opinion. The common thread, here, seems to be related to the idea of serving God as a "priest" in some fashion. Those of God in Israel were supposed to be seen as a "nation of priests", meaning David in some capacity was excused as a priest for his faith and priestly shadow (like the linen ephod). The Levitical priests were excused bc they're serving God in the temple per God's decree. And those who follow Messiah are seen as priests as echoed by Peter, Revelation, and more explicitly in Hebrews 13:10 "We have an altar from which those who serve the tent have no right to eat". Since Christ is the temple believers serve in as priests, their work is as God commands it, when he commands, much like the earthly levitical priests. I think this is why he alludes to being greater than the temple in Matt....but I can't quite figure out what "the sabbath was made for man not man for the sabbath" namely the "...man for the sabbath" part means nor how it plays into the overarching flow of thought in Mark. I also don't quite understand how "I desire mercy not sacrifice" plays into this either, but it obviously plays into the temple somehow, I think. I guess it would be important to qualify or clarify what "lawful to do good on the sabbath" means too...He then concludes the first encounter in Matt with "the son of man is lord over the sabbath" which is a trump-all authority card that doesn't seem to warrant explaining. --I figure whatever clarity we gain from these passages can be applied to other "sabbath challenge" passes, unless I've missed some other important line of logic that isn't self-evident elsewhere To summarize, the points I raise in both these passages is that Jesus seems to play INTO the accusation (breaking sabbath), not DENYING it, saying he's working like the Father is or implying that even though he breaks it, he and his disciples are guiltless, like David and priests. In both examples he appeals to authority: one to the Father and being his son, the other to himself as the lord of the sabbath. I just dont follow the line of argumentation/rationale/defense 100% clearly esp when he references mercy>sacrifice and "man not being made for sabbath"...I noticed that the word "unlawful/not lawful" is not the same word used by Peter in Acts 10:28, if that matters at all. The "dilemma" for the position I hold is this, according to the HIs: he couldn't have broken it (like actually broken it, not merely some tradition) because he wouldn't have been sinless. If he did break it (like actually break it) then he wasn't bound by the Mosaic covenant while he walked earth pre-death, which makes me have to qualify other verses that I'm sure you're already thinking of....I think I tend to the latter since we've already established that, even though the disciples didn't get it, he taught all foods were clean while alive pre-cross...at least that's where I am right now... If you read this, I apologize for being unclear or confusing if I have been, but I'd be sooo grateful for your input on this as I've been contemplating making some kind of playlist to refute common Hebrew Roots talking points and misused verses (it's swept a lot of men and women of color away from the truth). You exegete in similar fashion to me and it would be a blessing to get your thoughts. Peace and love, man
Hello, Da’Shaun. I’m glad you found us! The Sabbath is a huge topic and, IMO, it requires a bit of nuance to grasp the Biblical NT understanding of it. We’ve covered a lot of it here on this channel in terms of why the Mosaic Sabbath is not required of Christians. But I believe the moral principles behind those Sabbath commands are still in effect: the necessity of rest and setting time aside for God both personally and communally, of remembering what He’s done in our lives, of remembering that He is the source of our salvation, that God is our ultimate provider and sustainer, that we are to tend to the needs of those around us, including those who work for us, foreigners, even animals. But they are no longer lived out in the context of a mandated seventh-day rest punishable by death. I believe a regular period of rest is a God-ordained rhythm and a rewarding spiritual discipline, but it doesn’t matter what day it happens, and we don’t need to be legalistic about what is and isn’t work. In fact, I’m working on a new teaching in which I will make a case for Sabbath-keeping under the New Covenant. It’ll be out in a couple weeks. As to your question, there is some ambiguity in Scripture that we need to allow for. First, the definition of “work” in the Torah is extremely thin. What exactly were the Israelites to rest from on the Sabbath? God left it vague intentionally. Second, Jesus’ comments on the Sabbath are also quite ambiguous. Every time He teaches about the Sabbath, it’s in the context of a clash with the Pharisees. And He never commands Sabbath-keeping of anyone. At the same time, we know that Jesus was sinless in His humanity, and therefore, He kept the Sabbath in perfect alignment with God’s will for it. I believe when He says, “The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath,” he’s speaking about the created order of things. The Sabbath wasn’t created for its own sake; it was a gift of God to His people. It wasn’t given to put us in a kind of straight jacket as the Pharisees did. It was for our good-to provide rest from labor and opportunity for worship. Jesus said this because the Pharisees made the Sabbath a day of burdensome rule-keeping instead of freeing a day for us to rest from our labors. In other words, the fundamental principle Jesus teaches is that the Sabbath rest was intended to benefit us; therefore, keeping it is subordinate to the needs of those around us. We were not created just so God would have someone to observe the Sabbath! As with everything else Jesus taught, I believe the core Sabbath issue is internal, the attitude of our hearts. Blessings, Rob
@@TheBiblicalRoots I think we agree on the general spirit and application of the sabbath for new covenant believers: both Jewish and non-Jewish. I look forward to your videos! If you ever do a verse-by-verse study breaking down Jesus' rationale/arguments/line of thinking and what the OT references mean in the gospels when confronted on the sabbath, tag me in the comments or something (even tho I got notifications on haha). "Do not X on sabbath" followed by "I am X-ing" will definitely lean on "alignment with God's will for it". I do appreciate your trying to explain the one chiasmus abt sabbath and man :)
@@dashaunjefferies1168 That was a great, detailed breakdown = I enjoyed reading it. I agree on every point, including the questions. I have sort of come to the conclusion that as YHWH Hosiah (Jehovah + Savior = Jesus), God, Creator, Author & Maker of the covenants, He is above & beyond all the covenants & as a Davidic/Melchizedekian priest (not an Aaronic/Levitical one) He is "in service" (i.e. working) daily. So, as you say, if we are in the same priesthood as Jesus, then we are also "in service" daily. I don't see it as a contradiction (as the Torahists do), because, after all, we are in service under another covenant. But the Torahists simply canNOT grasp the new covenant part of the equation, so there is no other choice for them but to judge us. It is a rational decision on their part, as perplexing as it seems from our standpoint. Paul does say there is a "veil of blindness" whenever the Torah is read & I assume Paul means studied-with-the-intent-of-keeping as the Jews & the Torahists do. I don't want to write them off as hopelessly unreachable, but it does seem to require an "act of God" to break through to them 😥
@@kimartist Okay thanks, I try to make it a point to be clear and articulate when explaining stuff haha. ..yea, every defender of the faith against HI's/Torahists/Judaizers who subscribes to idea of being under a new, reformed covenant with God will ultimately have to wrestle w the notion of the "time of reformation". What I mean is that for a new covenant to be enacted, it must be *introduced* first--prior to the shedding of blood to *enact* the covenant. Even Moses' model follows suit: the words/commands first, then sprinkling of the people. And for the Messiah, it came while being under a covenant already; therefore, he taught the Kingdom of God during the time of the Law & Prophets. So, to even begin this time of reformation, something has to be changed, amended, superseded, removed, or added in some capacity. You cannot keep the seed whole AND have its plant and fruits come forth. The kernel must die in the dirt (to fulfill the purpose of the seed), but it mustn't be shattered (abolished and its authority disregarded). Having this role of "seed burier/plant bringer" requires him to not be fully bound by the expectations of the old covenant (in the common Israelite sense) but fully bound to his appointed and foretold role as Reformer. In this way, verses like Matt 5:17, Rom 3:31, & Gal 4:21-31 (to name a few) have this very thing in mind. They USE the law to establish their points concerning reform in how to relate to God. For example, I have found no evidence that Jesus taught to circumcise Gentiles even as an expression of faith in him, but the apostles know that that's something he purported was no effect (despite a staggering story involving Moses' circumcision). I don't think Jesus' opinions on this were introduced post-resurrection via the Spirit, much like his other teachings. He MAY have said it vaguely or in a parable or did some "remez" hinting, idk, but the point is: the friction of reform vs the currently binding old covenant was something Jesus himself had to navigate as he spoke on it, and I find it hard for him, being in that position, to be bound to the letter of the law while introducing the spirit of the law. The only legal loophole I find is that he is absolutely beholden to the spirit of the law, but relatively beholden to the letter via his previously prophesied role. Spoiler alert: this friction is mimicking his humanity & Godship as the resurrection relates the covenants in our own (believers) flesh as well, since we are "sown in dishonor" and now "partake in the divine nature." If only I knew how they "reasoned from the scriptures" or what "beginning with Moses and all the Prophets, he explained to them what was said in all the Scriptures concerning himself" looked like... With all cults and dissident ways of thinking in religion, there's usually a changing of the definition of understood words that often will manifest as the equivocation fallacy. In my case, almost every time a Hebrew Israelite would read "law" or "lawless(ness)" or "command(ment)", The Mosaic Covenant is all they'd think of, despite context. I find that part of it is reading comprehension, part of it is lack of good pastoring/knowledge of covenant theology, but a big part of it is wanting that feeling of walking away from the culture (that you're displeased with in some regard) and toward God and feeling separate. I think all of these play a part in many's journey into Torahism but the hardest thing to reach is a feeling they hold deep. Devils uses that "disdain for the culture" feeling to work against the body--speaking from my own experience, here. Loving, genuinely, is the remedy to that "inner disgust and wanting to belong to the 'special knowledge' group" feeling. When I was actively involved in trying to pull members out and get them to see, I remember really understanding the emotional workshop they had at their disposal and how fractured God was experienced in their lives and the culture. I cried so much bc it felt like these ppl get hell on earth and then they'll go to hell afterward, leading others to do the same, bc most wind up holding (whether they proclaim it aloud or not) that you can forfeit salvation by not keeping the Law of God (as they love to reference it). My heart is very "come let's reason" toward those who are willing to hear and, as Paul would call "weak in the faith," and very "leave 'em alone; they're blind guides" toward those who are encompassed by their own "boldness." It's been years since I've actively dealt with them but my heart is still goes out to them often, even the violent camps. They've brought the scriptures and early church writings to life for me in some way, but at a depressing cost. But it's comforting knowing that online ministries and street apologists exist to reach broadly in case they want to look beyond the veil.
@@dashaunjefferies1168 Yes 😢 Just psychologically speaking, I find that people who want a hard, almost militaristic lock (& lockstep) on the things of life, often come from a chaotic background - feeling out of control - so laser-focusing on "the rules" & "the rewards" of Torah-keeping combined with the giddiness of "special revelation" about it gives them a sense of stability that perhaps they've never had before. It's hard for me personally to relate to, growing up in a relatively stable family & having a doting father - who wasn't Christian until the very end & yet somehow acted more Christian than many I've met - which made it very easy for me to believe that God really loves me & wants a familial-style relationship with me like any good father would, rather than an indifferent arms-length general-to-soldier type relationship where unquestioningly following orders is the only imperative & means of achievement. I just don't see how they can read the parable of the prodigal son (for example) &/or see how tenderly Jesus ministered to His disciples & others & not get the type of relationship He is seeking? Instead they completely skip over those & obsessively focus on the go-&-sin-no-mores & "See? He kept the Sabbath!" & narrow-is-the-way & I-never-knew-you type passages as validation of their rule-keeping ways. I wish I had the key to open the heart! But you are probably right that it's only the ones who are asking sincere questions that can ever come away. Yes I get accused of being "emotional" & a "free gracer" (whatever that is - I don't even know) & licentious & every kind of outlandish insulting thing. No, I just know what love is. That's all.
Thank you. This video helped me to keep in my faith in Jesus Christ. So much stuff online and social media to target Christians to lose faith. I have a pretty solid background and I almost fell off. I got kids. I cannot lose my faith.
Amen brother , ground your Christian faith strong before listening to thief who try to deceive you from the truth of Christ . Don’t let yourself be fooled . Question them in every way you can they hate that . Sometimes when they read a verse they add words to them that aren’t there altogether begin with , it’s mind bowing 🙇♂️
He is writing the law, Torah, on the hearts of Israel and Judah. (Jeremiah and Hebrews) Everyone else is blessed to be a part of it. A good bible study will show he did not throw away his people. In their Israel and Judah's disobedience, he is using heathens to make them jealous so that they will return to him.
I would love to get your opinion on New Covenant Theology. Especially in relation of the Decalogue for sanctification in light of Deuteronomy 4:13, Exodus 34:28, and Hebrews 7:12. The big question that arises if there's a tripartite division of the Mosaic Law, if so, can you exegete this from scripture. Thank you!
@@TheBiblicalRoots *Solberg!! You've just proved that you are a liar ! The curse is only if Israel follow other gods (Jesus is a fine example of that) !* *People, this is how you have been manipulated by the church and people like Solberg!* *Deuteronomy 11* 28 and the curse, if you do not listen to the commandments of the Lord your God, but turn aside from the way which I am commanding you today, [w] *by following other gods which you have not known.* *Jesus was not known to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, worshiping Jesus is against God's law - that is a key teaching given by God, here:* *Deuteronomy 13:* 7 If your brother, the son of your mother, tempts you in secret or your son, or your daughter, or the wife of your embrace, or your friend, who is as your own soul saying, *"Let us go and worship other gods, which neither you, nor your forefathers have known"* 8 Of the gods of the peoples around you, [whether] near to you or far from you, from one end of the earth to the other end of the earth; 9 You shall not desire him, and you shall not hearken to him; neither shall you pity him, have mercy upon him, nor shield him. 10 But you shall surely *** him, your hand shall be the first against him to put him to ***, and afterwards the hand of all the people. ___________________________________________________ *Stop listening to people who manipulate God's word, the true word of God is clear and if you worship Jesus in any way, shape or form, including the eucharist or sanctifying in his name, you practice Idolatry!*
@@TheBiblicalRoots *Solberg!! You've just proved that you are a liar ! The curse is only if Israel follow other gods (Jesus is a fine example of that) !* *People, this is how you have been manipulated by the church and people like Solberg!* *Deuteronomy 11* 28 and the curse, if you do not listen to the commandments of the Lord your God, but turn aside from the way which I am commanding you today, [w] *by following other gods which you have not known.* *Jesus was not known to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob - that is a key teaching given by God, here:* *Deuteronomy 13:* 7 If your brother, the son of your mother, tempts you in secret or your son, or your daughter, or the wife of your embrace, or your friend, who is as your own soul saying, *"Let us go and worship other gods, which neither you, nor your forefathers have known"* 8 Of the gods of the peoples around you, [whether] near to you or far from you, from one end of the earth to the other end of the earth; 9 You shall not desire him, and you shall not hearken to him; neither shall you pity him, have mercy upon him, nor shield him. 10 But you shall surely *** him, your hand shall be the first against him to put him to ***, and afterwards the hand of all the people. ___________________________________________________ *Stop listening to people who manipulate God's word, the true word of God is clear and if you worship Jesus in any way, shape or form, including the eucharist or sanctifying in his name, you practice Idolatry!*
10:37 - how could Jeremiah be talking about the old covenant when he says; quoting Hashem "a new covenant not like the one i made with your fathers"; to Israel" and as you said/noted there are future aspects of this new covenant added to the new covenant that will be enacted. Isn't it these we should be looking out for? btw it's the law given under the old covenant, that will be written in their hearts and the spirit poured on them to cause them to walk after his way (his law, commands, precepts, instructions, statutes). - this era we who are in messiah live in; the foretaste of the kingdom which has come and is coming; not yet fully ratified, because the resurrection hasn't occurred yet.
He taught and demonstrated the New Covenant BEFORE He christened it to a room full of Jews then signed it with His blood and sealed it with His death Heb 9:16-17 is clear testament only goes into effect after the testator is dead Confirmed Gal 3:15 Is why we must live as He did says 1 John 2:6 and “love as I have loved you” JUST AS Our standard for living is established PRIOR His death and not by subsequent teaching and practice which came decades even centuries AFTER…by man and his traditions
@@KamalasFakePolls like Paul you mean…a follower of “the Way”? Who told Romans we uphold/establish the Law? You’d have Him teach things He never did or practiced Himself…giving to others burdens He never carried
@@makenoimage hahahaha yeah, he fought to get rid of circumcision and then the next chapter over in the book of Acts he circumcised somebody. Hahaha good call out
42:30 - so what happens when messiah returns to the faithful Jews, cause it's not until his appearing scripture tells us they'll own him? 43:10 - We do have to remember the law was given to Israel primarily and they will still be ministering and functioning to the nations in the millennial reign; these laws are about how the Kingdom the disciples/apostles in the beginning of Acts were hoping would be restored post haste. 43:36 - Sha'ul spoke on this; the jews are to remain jews and the gentile believers are to remain gentile; the law stands for those it is applicable to, depending on the level of holiness they are called to. 🤔🤔 How Yehovah deals w/ sin isn't the law, but a reward; death or Life depending on how the law is carried out.
30:18 - it's being renewed, not fully, would you say? as we're encouraged daily to so; wehave to put that work of faith in w/ the aid of the spirit, no?
Christ IS Israel! I resisted this at first but as I continued to suspend my rejection of it until I could study it I finally realized it, and so clear to see and can not un-see it now! If you're IN Christ you're part of Israel because He IS Israel! Israel as a people existed to be the delivery system of the Messiah to the world. 'All the families of the earth' have been blessed by God IN Christ as promised to Abraham and we're heirs according to that promise! Israel was also a 'type' with Christ being the 'anit-type' in so many ways it's magical!
Israel was rebellious and forgetful and ungrateful. What you call magic is really being bewitched. Jesus is Messiah, the bridegroom, the Lamb of God, the door, the temple, the bread of life, and the living water; but Jesus is not Israel. You are making stuff up.
@Say-hey24 well Paul said that if you’re in Christ, then you are saved. He also said that Jews, who rejected Christ could be grafted back in. And he also said, therefore, all Israel will be saved. If A equals B and B equals C then A equals C… not directly stated, but it’s only those in Christ that will be saved. And all Israel will be saved…. ❤️
Hello professor, can you explain the method of salvation for the gentiles prior to Jesus? For example, Ruth, Rahab, Caleb, etc. Would it have been the same or would there be a different method of forgiveness? To clarify, I mean if the Israelites’ sins were forgiven when they sacrificed animals, would the requirement for the sins of gentiles would have been sacrifices too?
@Abbey486 You're correct. The gentiles had knowledge of sacrifices also. Genesis 4:1-10 Genesis 8:20 Job 1:5 Job 42:7-8 Numbers 23:1-6 Blood is needed to atone for sin. Leviticus 17:11 Hebrews 9:22 1 Samuel 3:12-14
It is a question, but not a brilliant one. The same question can be asked about Abraham, who, incidentally also was a Gentile chosen by Yahweh to be the ancestor of His people. Abraham’s sins were not forgiven because he offered animals sacrifices. *Gen 15:6* says that Abram believed in Yahweh, and Yahweh counted Abram as righteous because of his faith. This verse is the clearest expression in Scripture of the truth of salvation by grace, through faith - (*Eph 2:8*). This is the first time the words “believed” and “righteousness” are used in Scripture. No one can prove biblically that Abram, or any person for that matter, was made right because of their obedience or their fulfillment of religious law or ritual, e.g. sacrifices or circumcision. It was faith alone that caused God to account Abram as righteous. This same principle applies to the other Gentiles that you mentioned, i.e., Ruth, Rahab, Caleb. Each of these pioneers of faith were counted righteous solely because of their belief and trust in Yahweh. *The premise of salvation was and has always been based on belief in Yahweh.* The forgiveness of sins for the Israelites was temporal as sacrifices had to be made repeatedly and continuously, year after year. *Heb 10:4 says, “It is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins.”* The only One who can take away sins permanently is Jesus Christ. Therefore, our redemption and salvation is found solely in believing and trusting in Him.
@@mrsmorgann0000 The 'New' Covenant=Abrahamic Covenant Renewed & Fully Fulfilled. The A.C.=roots of the N.C. but NOT the tree, and why Christianity doesn't have Jewish roots and isn't beholden to Israel or the Law because The Word that preached The Gospel to Abe wasn't Jewish and neither was Abe or Isaac. (Gen 15-22; Gal 3) The Word for New doesn't always mean completely new just like me being a New creation doesn't mean I have all new parts
37:04 - new covenant ppl 39:00 - but there are prophecies that mention there are others of his fold that will come to know him, which is an indication of gentiles entering in to the Kingdom, but that's not a new concept, because Israel has always had the stranger who are immersed to whatever level they are callled to in the Judaic culture, from the Exodus from Egypt
47:08 - we form a temple for him, however the nations in the meillenial reign will need the education of the temple, hence the one messiah will build after the one to built for the Anti-christ; as it will be desecrated
Both of the covenants are made with ethnic Israel only as they are the only house hold that God chose out of all the world, but the new covenant through Christ Jesus our Lord invited Gentiles into the household more freely through faith in the done work of Jesus Christ than the invitation to the gentiles in the old covenant by Moses through works commanded to be done by Faith looking forward to the work of God in the future.
Hey Professor Rob, The proof that the New Covenant is not in force today is that you are trying to teach us about God and such which is an open violation of the very wording of the New Covenant in Jeremiah 31:34. And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more. Jeremiah 31:34 The fact that Christians kept teaching about God so much after the cross suggests that the New Covenant wasn’t yet in place. And daily in the temple, and in every house, they ceased not to teach and preach Jesus Christ. Acts 5:42 And he commanded us to preach unto the people, and to testify that it is he which was ordained of God to be the Judge of quick and dead. Acts 10:42 And after he had seen the vision, immediately we endeavoured to go into Macedonia, assuredly gathering that the Lord had called us for to preach the gospel unto them. Acts 16:10 Then fourteen years after I went up again to Jerusalem with Barnabas, and took Titus with me also. And I went up by revelation, and communicated unto them that gospel which I preach among the Gentiles, but privately to them which were of reputation, lest by any means I should run, or had run, in vain. Galatians 2:1-2 Why? Didn’t Paul know Jeremiah 31:34 argues that we won’t be teaching about God anymore under the New Covenant? Because Paul seems all for trampling all over that provision of the New Covenant here if the New Covenant were already in force back then. How then shall they call on him in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard? and how shall they hear without a preacher? Romans 10:14 The New Covenant says how, “And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD:…” Jeremiah 31:34
Under the New Covenant we will already know God. It’s a consequence of God writing his law in our heart. A key reason for why Christ gave the gospel commission in Matthew 28 is because Christ knew we were not yet under the New Covenant. Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen. Matthew 28:19-20 Are you going to sit here and tell me Christ didn’t know this would violate a plainly stated provision of the New Covenant in Jeremiah 31:34, unless the New Covenant comes at some point after the gospel commission was finished? Now, I know you like this verse, For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins. Matthew 26:28 Which is not quite the same as saying, “I am placing you under the New Covenant at this time.” Christ can identify that the above is representative of his blood under the New Testament, and still hold off on placing people under the New Covenant until some point long after the gospel commission is finished so as not to violate Jeremiah 31:34 with the gospel commission. But notice, people often miss the next verse which says, But I say unto you, I will not drink henceforth of this fruit of the vine, until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father's kingdom. Matthew 26:29 So, what he appears to be doing here is a type or figure pointing to a much later future fulfillment. Likely what he is referencing here in Luke 22. Ye are they which have continued with me in my temptations. And I appoint unto you a kingdom, as my Father hath appointed unto me; That ye may eat and drink at my table in my kingdom, and sit on thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel. Luke 22:28-30 So, it is far more likely that Christ was suspending the New Covenant until well into our future.
Hey Rob, do you have any social media I can talk to you on? I have lots of questions about Hebrew roots and your view also. If not that’s okay. Thank you! -Durst
Question: is the law in the old covenant changed in the new covenant? If yes, what law from old covenant is replaced by what law in the new covenant? Does it include the 10 commandments? Thanks.
Jer. 31:32 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the LORD: The version you study says "like" The Bible says "according to" H5921 al, and is used throughout the old Testament. I challenge you to find one other mention of H5921 al, where it could be reasonably appropriate to render that word as "like" in translation. If Jeremiah meant like he would have used: H251, 1571,1819, 1821, 1823, 1825, 1922, 2088, 2421, 2654, 3644. 3651, 4911, 4711, 4915, 5973, 5974, 7737 Heb. 9:12 Neither by the blood of goats and calves, but by his own blood he entered in once into the holy place, having obtained eternal redemption for us.13 For if the blood of bulls and of goats, and the ashes of an heifer sprinkling the unclean, sanctifieth to the purifying of the flesh: Matt 26:28 For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins. According to the blood of sacrificed bulls to the covenant at Sinai, according to the blood of Christ for the new Covenant. Not according to the blood of bulls, but according to the blood of Christ. New does not mean different. If YHVH wanted Jeremiah to tell us he was going to make a different covenant, novel from the first, he likely would have used H1278 beriyah or it's root H1254 bara. Only by context in Hebrew are we given a clue to the intent of the author. As you already pointed out in this video, Same words written on parchment, now written on our hearts. Not most or some of YHVH's words, and not his words with many or few changes. Not these words of YHVH on these people, and those words of YHVH on those people, those things are all imagined by the hearts of men. Here's a shadow picture you may have missed from the Old Testament: Exodus 34:1 And the LORD said unto Moses, Hew thee two tables of stone like unto the first: and I will write upon these tables the words that were in the first tables, which thou brakest. The same words that were on the first set of tablets. He did not say well let's leave out that second one because obviously you people were not able to keep that one. God doesn't change, you are trying to separate God from Jesus from the Word, that's unbiblical. I would break down and dismantle your every little thing in this video, but your whole starting point is faulty. God doesn't change Keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ. Peace
Hello, if I may ask a question, if someone asks to be saved and continues to practice a sin (pornography, or drugs, or adultery, etc..) not stumble with sin like someone who is trying but messes up, is the person practicing sin truly saved? Like are they saved by Grace, or is faith without works dead, or did they not actually mean it when they asked to be saved?
Ok I’ll play Devil’s advocate Tell me then why is it not the 10 commandments that are written on our hearts as that set of laws had no sacrificial requirements Would I be right to say the laws “10comandments” are the ones written on our hearts and which then makes a case for keeping the sabbath as it is the only neglected law amongst the 10 ? I am asking seeking understanding not a fight please understand
“Love the Lord your God with all your heart, all your soul, and all your mind” and “Love your neighbor as yourself” sums up 9 of the 10 Commandments. The Sabbath was not forgotten. We have our Sabbath every day through Jesus sacrifice. Christians can rest in Christ's finished work on the cross and find true Sabbath rest by coming to him.
@@SinclairHugh The Sabbath is forever . Many passages prove so . The best best one . Isaiah 66:23 (KJV) And it shall come to pass, [that] from one new moon to another, and from one sabbath to another, shall all flesh come to worship before me, saith the LORD.
22:20 - so are you saying the New covenant comes into effect after the millennial reign of Yeshua HaMashiach? Please review, because the B'rit Chadasha will be what will define the millenial reign... then it will be said; "a place of unwalled villages", 24:48 - yes it will be unconditional because they will be made to walk after his ways by the full operation of the Holy Spirit; they will be obedient. 26:40 - glad you cleared that up
Hi Rob... I see the new covenant speaking to regeneration not glorification, and that is one of the many reasons I believe the prophetic fulfillment is completed at the return of Christ when the elect nation of Israel is restored to God. Blessings
Unfortunately, there are a number of problems with how Christians try to explain instituting the New Covenant that need to be addressed here, and not conveniently passed over as is often the case. Since you started with verse 27, let’s begin reading from there. Jer 31:27 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will sow the house of Israel and the house of Judah with the seed of man, and with the seed of beast. Jer 31:28 And it shall come to pass, that like as I have watched over them, to pluck up, and to break down, and to throw down, and to destroy, and to afflict; so will I watch over them, to build, and to plant, saith the LORD. Jer 31:29 In those days they shall say no more, The fathers have eaten a sour grape, and the children's teeth are set on edge. This is the same idea God says he will get rid of in Ezekiel 18:1-4, clarifying why the idea of sin transfer doesn’t work, because in righteous judgment the only one who can die for a sin is the one who committed it. Yet, Christians teach that Christ can falsely be judged and punished for their sins, nevermind how their misunderstanding of Christ’s going to the cross makes God into an unrighteous judge to even propose such injustice. In essence, before the New Covenant comes into play, God will first have to clear upfor us how righteous judgment actually works as God concludes here, saying, Jer 31:30 But every one shall die for his own iniquity: every man that eateth the sour grape, his teeth shall be set on edge. The same conclusion God essentially reaches in Ezekiel 18:4. So, ideas of Christ paying for your sins are out. It will never fly with God. It was condemned under Old Covenant law, it is being condemned here as God heads into the New Covenant. So, if you don’t understand why Christ could not have paid for your sins, you have not passed beyond the prerequisite to the New Covenant here, because you have not grasped why the proverb of the sour grapes is a mockery of justice. It turns out that you have to discern what the real remedy is for sins, and God spends the entire chapter of Ezekiel 18 clearing up that mess for anyone truly interested in what God has to say on the subject. But, it isn’t a solution a lot of Christians want to hear, and God even insists you will say his ways are unequal until you learn how righteous judgement truly works and start to agree with him on the matter. God can actually forgive sins, and Christ was doing that left and right long before the cross, so the whole idea of making Christ pay for sins is done by those who secretly believe God is merciless as a judge and cannot forgive sins. Next, after clearing up the above issue, God will be able to move us towards this idea of the New Covenant. Jer 31:31 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah: Anywhere else throughout the Old Testament, Gentile Christians not wanting to run the risk of ideas applying to them would say God is only speaking to literal Israel and literal Judah when acknowledging them like this, but if they say that here, they screw themselves out of having access to participate under the New Covenant. Let’s be clear, once we open pandorah’s box and start insisting God is also speaking to Gentiles here as Spiritual Israel, we can’t conveniently go back and use the excuse that the other things God says to Israel and Judah only apply to literal Israel and literal Judah to close pandorah’s box. Because God clarifies below even further who he is speaking to, saying, Jer 31:32 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the LORD: Keep in mind, the Gentile Christians cannot claim that the “father’s God is speaking of above are their blood relative fathers without opening a huge can of worms here. So, again, if this is to be taken spiritually, and not literally, then the Old and New Covenants both must apply to more than literal Israel and literal Judah, else this clarification above would bar Gentiles access to the New Covenant. Notice, nowhere in the wording of the New Covenant does it ever claim God has necessarily abolished the Old Covenant by introducing this New Covenant either. Such an abolishing would be in direct opposition to what the angel of the Lord in Judges 2 claims, concerning never breaking the Old Covenant between God and his people. Jer 31:33 But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people. Notice, God does not say he is writing a new law in our heart. That’s critical, because a lot of people will like to claim this is some kind of vague “new law”, or even no law at all, but grace, faith and all kinds of crap that is not even mentioned here. The Hebrew word here is “torah” which is much bigger than the assumed “Law of Moses” in that Torah would clearly mean all five of the books from Genesis to Deuteronomy. This is why later in Jeremiah 33, we find that the Levites won’t fail to have a man who makes offerings before God in the coming Davidic kingdom, because Levitical law is not abolished, but quite restored under the New Covenant. Proof of this can be found in Zechariah 14 as we observe Gentile nations like Egypt keeping Tabernacles. Gentile nations like Egypt never kept Levitical feasts like Tabernacles before, but these provisions of Torah become more universal over Gentile nations the moment you open Pandorah’s box and bring the Gentiles under this covenant. Same with the circumcision of flesh and heart in Ezekiel 44 which will be required in order for Gentiles to enter the temple of the Davidic kingdom as well. In fact, Ezekiel 44-46 reintroduces all kinds of provisions concerning Levites, Levitical feasts, sabbaths, new moons and so on in the future Davidic Kingdom and its temple. This next provision creates a problem when Christians attempt to say Christ was instituting the New Covenant in the gospels. Jer 31:34 And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more. So, why are Christians who insist they are under the New Covenant still teaching people about God today if that is completely unnecessary under the stated provisions of the New Covenant? Christ didn’t claim his disciples shall “teach no more”, like the New Covenant claims above, but instead Christ in Matthew 28 sent his disciples out to teach all nations about God and his kingdom. This is because Christ knew we will not be under the New Covenant until after the gospel commission has completed. You see, the Old Covenant covers the time we spend in this old earth, and the New Covenant is not introduced until we enter the New Earth. This becomes even more evident by the next problem we face in verse 35-36. Jer 31:35 Thus saith the LORD, which giveth the sun for a light by day, and the ordinances of the moon and of the stars for a light by night, which divideth the sea when the waves thereof roar; The LORD of hosts is his name: Jer 31:36 If those ordinances depart from before me, saith the LORD, then the seed of Israel also shall cease from being a nation before me for ever. This provision of the New Covenant explains precisely why it would be dangerous to institute the New Covenant back at the time of Christ’s first coming. This detail from Revelation 21 states that in our future the sun and moon are no longer around which would rapidly lead to the unfortunate outcome mentioned in the above section of the New Covenant concerning Israel ceasing as a nation before God. Rev 21:23 And the city had no need of the sun, neither of the moon, to shine in it: for the glory of God did lighten it, and the Lamb is the light thereof. Ooops! This means the sun and moon which God is speaking about in the New Covenant are obviously ordinances which come later, and John here is seeing the New Jerusalem at a time when there is no sun or moon present. So, to introduce the New Covenant before the fulfillment of Revelation 21 would be utterly disasterous for the nation of israel.
Hey Rob. I have one question. Why does James specifically call out to the 12 tribes of Israel in his opening statement? The reason being is many would say this is the church but isnt that a poor interpretation? Hes quite direct. My assumption is hes addressing the literal tribes which were scattered abroad. I thought this identity was lost for hundreds of years at this point.
Abba Father shall bring them back according to the scriptures. His promises are Yes and Amen. They must first wake up from the slumber He (Yahuah)put them in first, they must repent from sin.
@@mdcxi1611 Yes I get what u saying and that is so! I'm talking about the 12 tribes, there's only one nation called Israelites, those I assume u thought I was talking about are not the ones obviously, they call themselves Isaeli... (Check the spelling also) For they know very well that they aren't! Read Rev.3:9
I think your assumption of literal tribes is correct. Perhaps James is writing to his fellow Jewish believers in Jesus who are living in the Dispersion. [By this point, the synagogue system had grown large outside Israel, as evidenced in Acts where Paul is mentioned preaching the Gospel in SEVEN named cities' synagogues.] BTW, in Luke 2:36, Anna is mentioned as a descendant of Asher [one of the so-called lost tribes]. Jesus mentions the 12 tribes in Matt 19:28 (& Luke 22:30). Paul mentions the 12 tribes in Acts 26:7. Hope this helps. 😊
Some of Israel was “scattered” to Judea (Judah), they weren’t all scattered abroad, the portion of Israel that scattered to the nations, melted into the nations, and are now, no more.
@35:39 it's impossible to break this " New covenant " because it's not a covenant it is a promise from God to keep our end of the covenant which we break. A covenant is like a contract that is two-sided we're both parties have an obligation to perform or provide specific things in order to have a deal with each other to have relationship with one another in good standing. A promise is a one-sided declaration saying I will do this in a promise does not have conditions. And that's why it's impossible to break this " new " covenant because it's not a covenant and a failure for us to distinguish between the two can cause confusion and deception and misunderstanding
If God writes his Torah on our hearts and Jesus says that nothing from the law will pass until all is fulfilled. And if not all things are fulfilled yet doesn't that mean we're still supposed to obey the Torah? Jesus life death and resurrection isn't a fulfillment of all things is only the fulfillment of redemption we're still waiting for the fulfillment of restoration and so the Torah is still to be followed and obeyed no? Cuz I'm getting confused cuz some videos are saying that we don't have to keep kosher and some videos are saying that the toilet is still to be followed and I'm perceiving contradiction so I'm just trying to clear it up
According to you Paul taught the dangerous beliefs of Torah-ism...... Here Are Examples Of Paul Keeping Torah: * Circumcised Timothy (Acts 16:1-3) * Took the nazarite vow (Acts 18:18; 21:17-26) * Taught and observed Gods holy days such as: * Passover (Acts 20:6; 1Cor. 5:6-8; 11:17-34) * Shavuot (Pentecost) (Acts 20:16; 1Cor. 16:8) * Fasting on Yom Kippur (Acts 27:9) . Paul and others made a Temple sacrifice for their Nazarite vow, . So Paul went to the Temple the next day with the other men. They had already started the purification ritual, so he publicly announced the date when their vows would end and sacrifices would be offered for each of them. Acts 21:26 . . Paul kept the Sabbath Acts 18:4 - And he (Paul) reasoned in the synagogue every Sabbath, and persuaded the Jews and the Greeks.(Gentiles) . . Paul taught that a believer in Yeshua the Messiah is saved by grace through faith (Ephesians 2:8-9). . After we are saved by grace through faith, Paul taught that we should follow the Torah (Romans 3:28-31). . . Paul followed the Torah through the help of the Holy Spirit (Romans 7:22). . . Paul did not teach people to observe the law in order to be saved or justified. . . That was not the purpose of the law. . . He taught them to observe the law in order to honor God as they walked out the Christian life in the footsteps of their Lord Jesus. . . By this we know that we love the children of God, when we love God, and keep HIS commandments. For this is the love of God, that we keep his commandments: and his commandments are not grievous. .....1 John 5:2-3 KJV . . I dont have all the bible answers but IF Messiah declared the unclean, clean, by abolishing the Law of Elohim His PERFECT TORAH, Psalms 19:7, Instructions, Teachings for righteous SET APART living in this evil wicked world then HE SINNED by transgressing Deut 4:2 AND that would make Isaiah a False Prophet for making this end time prophesy of Messiahs return ….. Isaiah 66:15-17 . For, behold, the LORD will come with fire, and with his chariots like a whirlwind, to render his anger with fury, and his rebuke with flames of fire. . 16 For by fire and by his sword will the LORD plead with all flesh: and the slain of the LORD shall be many. . 17 They that sanctify themselves, and purify themselves in the gardens behind one [tree] in the midst, eating swine's flesh, and the abomination, and the mouse, shall be consumed together, saith the LORD.
That's not Torahism, Jeff. Of course Paul and the apostles did those things. They were never prohibited or forbidden! For followers of Jesus those Mosaic rituals are permitted but not required. Torahism, however, wrongly teaches that they *_are_* required. Remember Paul said, "To the Jews I became like a Jew, to win the Jews. To those under the law I became like one under the law *(though I myself am not under the law),* so as to win those under the law" (1 Cor. 9:20). Permitted. Not required. Shalom, RLS
Somebody Has To Die by kimartist Somebody has to die before you can remarry into another family. Somebody has to die before you can inherit their estate. Somebody has to die before you can be "born again" into a new body. Somebody has to die before you can "resurrect" into eternal life. Somebody has to die before you can be permanently forgiven for everything for all time. Somebody has to die. Somebody did die. Somebody died. Somebody. Jesus. You.
"For this reason Christ is the mediator of a new covenant, that those who are called may receive the promised eternal inheritance-now that he has died as a ransom to set them free from the sins committed under the first covenant. In the case of a will, it is necessary to prove the death of the one who made it, because a will is in force only when somebody has died; it never takes effect while the one who made it is living." ~ Hebrews 9 : 15-17
Asinine comment. There are no animal sacrifices in the new covenant. Jesus is the new king- priest who established the here and better min conditional covenant based upon better promises made to Abraham. Jesus necessarily established a new and better law. Your statement is the epitome of ignorance.
@ Your lack of knowledge of the word shows . Ezekiel, Zechariah and others speak of the Prince that will give daily sacrifices . And all Nations will come up on the Sabbaths and new moons to give worship . Read for yourself . Laziness is the only reason you have for not knowing truth .
@@jimharmon2300 your ignorance is so profound it’s hilarious. Rob just gave you at least 12 differences between the old conditional covenant of condemns and death, and the unconditional new covenant in the Spirit. You are not a Christian
@ Now you have made yourself a judge . Congratulations on your promotion. You serve your idol , I will serve my GOD . Jesus never did away with any laws nor added to . He only clarified. The Pharisee added to the law . You people are taking away from the law . Which is the greater sin ?
@ Now you have made yourself a judge . Congratulations on your promotion. You serve your idol , I will serve my GOD . Jesus never did away with any laws nor added to . He only clarified. The Pharisee added to the law . You people are taking away from the law . Which is the greater sin ?
Question: There are 24 instances of ESV of the word commandments in NT, and often we are called to keep God’s Commandments. What are those commandments being referenced? Sincere question.. not a gotcha trying to keep things straight.
Is the correct understanding that all the ceremonial laws (things dealing with purification, defilement, sanctuary, feast days, holidays, etc.) are removed- but those commands that are principal based and repeated in New Testament and have a natural reflection on loving God and humanity are still valid? This isn’t trying to use moral as 10 commandments.
The commands of God are what God expects of man. Any rule made by God, from Genesis to Revelation is part of the commands of God. However, the Mosaic ceremonies make up only part of complete commands of God. An important principle to remember is that orders that certain observances have ended are also commands of God. God commanded Peter and the Church to not call common what God made clean (speaking of unclean meats). (Acts 10). We are also commanded to not become circumcised in 1 Corinthians 7:18.
@@ri3m4nn Of course. But the same morally consistent God told Abraham to sacrifice his son and then later He told him not to sacrifice his son. This doesn’t mean that God changes His mind or that He is confused about what is right or wrong. Instead it shows that the purpose of some commands can be accomplished. In the case of Isaac’s sacrifice the purpose of the command was to demonstrate the faith of Abraham and point to Christ. When this is accomplished the command is not longer enforced. If the purpose of the Mosaic ceremonies was to be a shadow of Christ, when this is accomplished they need not be enforced. Moreover, to continue to enforce them shows a misunderstanding of what those laws were in the first place.
Hello, James! I count 128 instances of the word "command/ment(s)" in the ESV. And to understand what is meant by that word, we need to read each of those uses in its own context. For example, in 1 John we read, "This is his commandment, that we believe in the name of his Son Jesus Christ and love one another, just as he has commanded us" (1 John 3:23). So there are two specific commandments, at least one of which does not come from the Torah. And when Jesus was asked, “Teacher, which is the great commandment in the Law?” (Matt. 22:36), He's specifically being asked about the commandments of the Law of Moses, and He responds by providing two Commandments that were given in the Torah (Matt. 22:37-40). So context is king! Blessings, Rob
Hi Abbey. When the Bible speaks of the righteous remnant of Israel, it's speaking of God's promise to save Israel by setting apart a remnant of Jews who would not be lost or scattered. This refers to a small number of people who remain faithful to God despite the unfaithfulness of others around them. In Romans, Paul says "At the present time there is a remnant, chosen by grace" (Rom. 11:5). He's speaking of Jews who have put their faith in Christ. The existence of this remnant is proof that God has not rejected all of Israel. The "Church" on the other hand, refers to the entire assembly of believers in Jesus, both Jew and Gentile. So the remnant is part of the Christ's Church. Blessings! Rob
@@TheBiblicalRoots He has one bride though yes? One Law for native born and foreigner alike as already in the OT Or is His House divided? His kingdom an apartheid state with two sets of laws?
Around the 35-36 minute mark, you mentioned that the new covenant is unbreakable. That sin cannot even break the new covenant. Does this mean that one can hold the belief of once saved always saved regardless of how much one sins? I ask this in light of Hebrews 10:26 and 1 Corinthians 5 and Church discipline described in Matthew 18.
Yes one in heaven, which is the Church = Rev 19:7 and one on earth, which is Future Israel believers = Matthew 22:1-14, this will take place some time after the Rapture of the Church.
@@fernandodeleon4115 lol… So the standard is not one man one wife? But here you claim He divides His love between two…following two sets of Laws as if His House is divided the kingdom an apartheid state
46:48 yep, it's weird, it's like you always got to spin it at the last second. Misrepresenting syncretism in Colossians is not honest... that verse directly connects to acts 15 which I will be giving a sermon on in a few weeks. Anyways, just got word Myles is interested in the debate. Hoping you will join him and Sam in the live debate against me. It will either be at his dad's Church (extremely liberal SDA branch), or his alma mater.
Hi, Mat! I haven't heard anything about a debate, but I was just on Myles' channel recently and we had a great discussion about specific doctrines: sabbath, law, dietary restrictions, etc. Our discussion should be published in a week or two. I think you'll enjoy it! Regarding Colossians 2, in your sermon are you planning to mention the larger context of vv. 16-23 where Paul makes the case that, because God’s presence, salvation, and victory are revealed fully in Christ (vv. 9-15), He is sufficient for the Colossians’ salvation and there is no need to pursue additional teachings or practices? RLS
@TheBiblicalRoots that's for the sermon after the next. This specific sermon addresses the schism in the biblical church. As for the debate, connect with him, he's apparently on board. He was raised in a very liberal SDA church (I was just there this weekend), he is part of the same conference that I am in and know his church does not have a proper view of Seventh-Day adventism. You don't seem interested in honest perspectives, so your participation in the debate would be outstanding.
Ezekiel 37:24-28 (ESV): 24 “My servant David shall be king over them, and they shall all have one shepherd. They shall walk in my rules and be careful to obey my statutes. 25 They shall dwell in the land that I gave to my servant Jacob, where your fathers lived. They and their children and their children’s children shall dwell there forever, and David my servant shall be their prince forever. 26 I will make a covenant of peace with them. It shall be an everlasting covenant with them. And I will set them in their land and multiply them, and will set my sanctuary in their midst forevermore. 27 My dwelling place shall be with them, and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. 28 Then the nations will know that I am the Lord who sanctifies Israel, when my sanctuary is in their midst forevermore.”
Colossians 2:16-17 (NLT): 16 So don’t let anyone condemn you for what you eat or drink, or for not celebrating certain holy days or new moon ceremonies or Sabbaths. 17 For these rules are only shadows of the reality yet to come. And Christ himself is that reality.
The old covenant was holy just and good, and spiritual. But its faultiness was that it lacked faith. The first covenant could be broken, but not the new covenant for those born again by Jesus' blood. Sin can only be committed by those under old testament law, whether the Mosaic or the law of nature.
""Far above all principality, and power, and might, and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in this world, but also in that which is to come:" The statement "this world" or "this age" was in reference to the Old Covenant age world which had not yet ended, and the statement "that (age, world) which is to come" was a reference to the New Covenant age world, which would abide and follow the end of the Old Covenant age world. The "Last days" in Scripture, therefore, never apply to the Christian age, but always to the closing period of the OC Jewish age, which ran from the His earthly ministry to the fall of Jerusalem in the first century during the Parousia, in 70 A.D. - Fulfilled.
It's called prophetic dualism, like that's such a basic concept of christianity. Christ still has to return, they're still sitting in the world, we still have to deal with sin in our gates, so he's not been eradicated.
@Animalsandwildlife.7527 hilarious and true, but he's a preterist which means he doesn't believe it was fully nailed on the cross, just that the second coming was fulfilled at the destruction of the temple.
@Animalsandwildlife.7527 Was salvation complete at the cross? (Many years after the cross, the apostles did not say they had salvation yet, but that their salvation was soon to come). Acts 3:19-21 "That your sins may be blotted out, when the times of refreshing shall come from the presence of the Lord; and he shall send Jesus Christ.. whom the heaven must receive until the times of restitution of all things (cf. Luke 21:22,32), which God hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets since the world began (cf. Rev. 10:7)." 1 Peter 1:5, "Who are kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation ready to be revealed in the last time." 1 Peter 1:9-10, "Receiving the end of your faith, even the salvation of your souls. Of which salvation the prophets have enquired and searched diligently, who prophesied of the grace that should come unto you:" Hebrews 9:28, "So Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many; and unto them that look for him shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation." Romans 13:11, "…for now is our salvation nearer than when we believed." 1 Thessalonians 5:8, "But let us, who are of the day, be sober, putting on the breastplate of faith and love; and for an helmet, the hope of salvation." Hebrews 1:14, "Are they not all ministering spirits, sent forth to minister for them who shall be heirs of salvation?" Revelation 12:10, "And I heard a loud voice saying in heaven, Now is come salvation, and strength, and the kingdom of our God, and the power of his Christ: for the accuser of our brethren is cast down, which accused them before our God day and night." (I believe that when the Kingdom of God came, consummated, eternal righteousness & salvation came). Philippians 1:19, "For I (Paul) know that this shall turn to my salvation through your prayer, and the supply of the Spirit of Jesus Christ." Philippians 2:12, "Wherefore, my beloved, as ye have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling." Sins were not blotted out until the second coming of Christ. Redemption was not at the cross, but was looked at as still future: Luke 21:28, "And when these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads; for your redemption draweth nigh." Romans 8:23, "...even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body." (From the dominion of the body of sin - Rom.6:6-9). Ephesians 1:14, "Which is the earnest of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession, unto the praise of his glory." Answer: The beginning of the end started at the cross. Salvation did start at the cross, but complete salvation came only at the second coming of Christ, in the last days. - Fulfilled in the first century.
Matthew 10:23 [23] But when they persecute you in this city, flee ye into another: for verily I say unto you, Ye shall not have gone over the cities of Israel, till the Son of man be come. Matthew 16:27-28 [27] For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every man according to his works. [28] Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom. Mark 9:1 [1] And he said unto them, Verily I say unto you, That there be some of them that stand here, which shall not taste of death, till they have seen the kingdom of God come with power. 1 Peter 4:7 [7] But the end of all things is at hand: be ye therefore sober, and watch unto prayer. James 5:7-8 [7] Be patient therefore, brethren, unto the coming of the Lord. Behold, the husbandman waiteth for the precious fruit of the earth, and hath long patience for it, until he receive the early and latter rain. [8] Be ye also patient; stablish your hearts: for the coming of the Lord draweth nigh.
WE ARE NOT IN THIS NEW COVENANT, ARE YOU GUYS NOT READING? IT'S 100 THINGS WRONG WITH THINKING WE'RE IN THIS COVENANT... HE'S LITERALLY STILL ATTEMPTING TO TEACH THE WORD OF GOD WHEN UNDER THIS COVENANT YALL SHOULD "KNOW HIM" (TO KNOW HIM IS TO KNOW HIS WORD) PPL LOVE TO OVERLOOK PARTS OF THE BIBLE TO FIT THEIR LIFE STYLE, AND ALL THAT'S DOING IS HURTING THEM.
It’s simple: 6:23 Jeremiah 31:33 But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my TORAH in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people. Yup…doesn’t say My NEW Law or SOME of My Law or MOST of My Law as if He has divided house And just like the OT it remains for ALL who reside in Him Numbers 15:29You shall have the same TORAH for the one who acts in error, whether he is a native-born Israelite or a foreigner residing among you. 30But the person who sins defiantly, whether a native or foreigner, blasphemes the LORD. That person shall be cut off from among his people. Makes sense as His are a blessing to ALL people and His House a House of prayer for ALL nations.
Keep in mind that the seventy weeks were determined upon "thy people and thy holy city", and that by the end of the seventy weeks, the city and the sanctuary would be destroyed. This was fulfilled in A.D. 70. We are not waiting today for the temple to be rebuilt today, simply so that it can be destroyed, as it has already happened! Also, by the end of this period, the 'sacrifice and the oblation' (Dan 9:27) were to cease. This, too, was accomplished in A.D. 70. We are not waiting today for the sacrifices to start again, simply so that they can stop, as this has already happened! In further confirmation, Daniel 9:24 lists six specific things that would be accomplished by the end of this period, all of which have been fulfilled. In confirmation of the fulfillment, it reads, "Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to:" 1. "Finish the transgression," - This was fulfilled. (Luke 11:47-51; Matt 23:29-32; Matt 21:33-45) 2. "Make an end of sins," - This was fulfilled. (John 1:29; Matt 1:21; Acts 10:43; Hebrews 9:26) 3. "Make reconciliation for iniquity," - This was fulfilled. (II Cor 5:18-21; Hebrews 2:17; Col 1:20; Romans 5:10) 4. "Bring in everlasting righteousness," - This was fulfilled. (Romans 3:25,26; Hebrews 9:12; II Thess 2:16; II Cor. 9:9) 5. "Seal up vision and prophecy," - This was fulfilled. (Hebrews 1:1-2; John 1:1; II Peter 1:19-21) 6. "Anoint the most holy (or holy place),"- This was fulfilled. (Matthew 3:15-17; Luke 4:18; Acts 4:26,27; 10:38) Interestingly, Christ, in response to the question of how many times a man should forgive his brother, responded by saying, "until seventy times seven," which is the exact amount of time in Daniel's seventy weeks. (490) The implication being that there was an end to Christ's patience with His nation. Christ fulfilled the covenant that they broke well over 490 'times'. That is not necessarily to say that Christ was saying after 'seventy sevens' we should not forgive, but that, simply, "seventy weeks (were) determined upon (Daniel's) people." Therefore, we can see that the desolation of Jerusalem in A.D. 70 fulfilled the prophecies of Daniel chapter nine, against the perverse generation that rejected the Lord and his Anointed. Christ judged the nation with desolation and took away the kingdom of God and gave it to a nation bringing forth fruits (Matthew 21:43), which is the nation of believers (Christians). The "days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled" spoken of can be no other than the fulfillment of Daniel's seventy weeks with the Desolation of Jerusalem in A.D. 70. Therefore, the desolation of Palestine in A.D. 66-73 was the fulfillment of Daniel's 70th week, and the end of any temporal 'Nation of God'.
Always points back to the law - because the law is light and is good for converting the soul. Jerimiah 31 33“But this is the covenant I will make with the house of Israel after those days, declares the LORD. >>I will put My law in their minds and inscribe it on their hearts.
@@TheBiblicalRoots well let me be more specific…it’s popular opinion that much from the old has been “done away with”…I’m proposing it’s much less than what is claimed in one covenant His people eat a certain diet and then in the new covenant they don’t … If in one covenant they keep to His calendar His festivals and in the new covenant they don’t In one covenant He alone is Immortal and in the new one He has 2 others equal to Him In one covenant the dead know nothing and in the new one the dead go multiple places for multiple reasons In one covenant images were prohibited and yet in the new covenant they’re expected And so it goes…the first seems cancelled… Never mind He taught and demonstrated this New Covenant prior His death and evidence of any claimed changes prior His death (or even in the 40 days He was with them after His resurrection) is much less compelling or clear than when the terms of the old one when it was established at Sinai…
@@TheBiblicalRoots *Solberg!! You've just proved that you are a liar ! The curse is only if Israel follow other gods (Jesus is a fine example of that) !* *People, this is how you have been manipulated by the church and people like Solberg!* *Deuteronomy 11* 28 and the curse, if you do not listen to the commandments of the Lord your God, but turn aside from the way which I am commanding you today, [w] *by following other gods which you have not known.* *Jesus was not known to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, worshiping Jesus is against God's law - that is a key teaching given by God, here:* *Deuteronomy 13:* 7 If your brother, the son of your mother, tempts you in secret or your son, or your daughter, or the wife of your embrace, or your friend, who is as your own soul saying, *"Let us go and worship other gods, which neither you, nor your forefathers have known"* 8 Of the gods of the peoples around you, [whether] near to you or far from you, from one end of the earth to the other end of the earth; 9 You shall not desire him, and you shall not hearken to him; neither shall you pity him, have mercy upon him, nor shield him. 10 But you shall surely *** him, your hand shall be the first against him to put him to ***, and afterwards the hand of all the people. ___________________________________________________ *Stop listening to people who manipulate God's word, the true word of God is clear and if you worship Jesus in any way, shape or form, including the eucharist or sanctifying in his name, you practice Idolatry!*
The covenant between God and man has always been the same. It has always depended upon God and not upon man. In Gen. 3:15 He alludes to the ministry of Jesus. In Genesis 15 God walks between the animals that had been cut in two by Himself, signifying that He was the only person upon which this covenant depended. In every instance when God interacts with man the presumption was that it was impossible for man to save himself--God had to save him. This is even true in the Mosaic covenant because God made provision in this covenant for atonement on a regular basis. All of these covenants are different perspectives on the same truth: man cannot save himself and God has a plan to save him!
40:14 hahhaa Planes Trains and Automobiles... filmed right here in Gowanda! There is a deeper meaning behind the modes of transportation used, there are a lot of videos I've put out that explain why. The path goes in both directions 'up' or 'down'... and the reason it is thru the desert is because of the mode of 'learning'... it don't matter if you 'know' the Lord or not... He 'knows' you... cause He does ALL THINGS (Isaiah 45:7)
Jerusalem means 'teaching of peace'. And 'my Father' is ALWAYS working... in the good AND the bad. Grace allows for 'sin' and si is the power of the law. Saved by grace is the butt kickin' He gives with the 'rod'... if you won't follow the 'staff'. Nothing has changed as God cannot change... people are just serving a God they 'don't know'. 😊
The transition period of the "last days generation" was AD 30 - AD 70. What was temporary - physical: 1. The Old Covenant written on stone. 2. Physical kingdom: the Law, the Temple, the Priesthood, National Jews and Canaan. What is eternal - Spiritual: 1. New Covenant - written on the heart, a Spiritual kingdom, the Gospel. 2. The Church, Christ, Saints, the Word, Life and Heaven
@georgebentonjr3876 Elijah already came (Malachi 4:5-6) and died during the 2nd temple era (Revelation 11:3-12)? When did Jesus return and defeat the A.C? (2 Thessalonians 2:4-8)
I'm not quite following you, Mike. Ethiopia is mentioned more than a dozen times in the Bible, and the crusades did not happen until 1,000 years after the Bible was written. RLS
@@TheBiblicalRoots I understand that but no one address the modification because there still many verses where Assyria was kept with ethiopa wrote out. Why is that if there both in Original texts?
@@TheBiblicalRootsI didn't mean wrote out completely older versions it's mentioned alot more but you say a thousand years later but those politcal factors clearly affected the publishing of the Bible we have today Am I wrong ? If so enlightened me I'm never too good to listen
@@tobintriplett5445 Hi, Tobin. I'm not aware of any political factors from the Crusades affecting modern Bible translations. The translations we have today are made from manuscripts that existed centuries before the Crusades, which happened from 1095-1291 CE. The earliest English translation of the Bible didn't appear until 1535. RLS
@@TheBiblicalRoots I mentioned those dates in my comment on your recent video but if you know what was going on during those years you would understand in there about 50 writers that contributed to the KJV BIBLE all members of English church during the crusades one of the main political issues was the English CHURCH WERE KILLING NON BELIEVERS literally KILLING but that same group was responsible for the translations we have today which if you did research you clearly see differences and tell me that there was not an agenda if you choose to think that that timeline is okay more power to you I guess the English CHURCH can do whatever they want and the people that disagree are under qualified
Hi, Phillip! The New Covenant is for everyone who has placed their faith in Jesus, whether they’re from the house of Israel or the house of Judah or the Gentile nations. And, conversely, being from the house of Israel or Judah no longer means that one is automatically part of God’s covenant people. The requirement under the New Covenant is faith in Jesus. The NT terminology for referring to the People of God is the “body of Christ,” or the “Church," or as Paul once referred to it: the "Israel of God" (Gal. 6:16). Blessings, Rob
The New Covenant has not started yet. 👉In Jer 31:34, God will not remember Israel sins but He remembers the Churches sins = 1Jhn 1:9/Rom 6:23/1Jhn 5:16,17 👉Israel will keep His judgments and do them = Eze 36:27 but the Church can not, Look at what Jesus says to the Church of Sardis in Rev 3:1 (...I know your works...), then He says =(...but you are dead...), meaning no works/ 1Cor 3:1-4/Gal 1:6 👉Israel will enter the land =Eze 36:28 but the Church has not entered. 👉In Eze 36:25-38, the Gentile believers are not mentioned of receiving a new heart in it's context, it's only talking about Israel, look at Eze 36:36, the Gentile believers are mentioned. God is not a liar. He will fulfill His promises to Israel in the future.
The New Covenant will start after those days. In Hebrews 8:10 (...after those days...) is the great tribulation period, Romans 11:26,27, will support this because that's talking about Jesus 2nd coming and saving all Israel and starting the New Covenant with future Israel believers, after the great tribulation period. 👉The great tribulation is also mentioned in Jeremiah 30:3-11, in verse 7, the great tribulation here is = (that day is great, so that none is like it.). Israel believers will be saved out of the great tribulation.
YOU MUST MAKE A CHOICE WHO TO SERVE AND WHO TO FOLLOW IF YOU WANT TO SERVE LORD GOD YEHOVAH THE MOST HIGH, SERVE YEHOVAH THE WAY YEHOVAH HAS COMMANDED TO BE ACCEPTABLE IF YOU ARE NOT READY TO SERVE YEHOVAH THE TRUE GOD THE WAY HE HAS COMMANDED, GOD SERVE YOUR IDOLS. WHY SHOULD YOU DECEIVE YOURSELF What is the use of claiming to serve and worship the Lord God Yehovah the God of Abraham if you are not ready to leave your idolatrous and abominable and ungodly traditional believes and practices to follow the way of Yehovah by his word, law, commandments and ordinances the way Abraham deed as commanded by Lord God Yehovah the most high ? 1 Kings 18:21 ASV And Elijah came near unto all the people, and said, How long go ye limping between the two sides? if Jehovah be God, follow him; but if Baal, then follow him. And the people answered him not a word. Joshua 24:14-25 ASV Now therefore fear Jehovah, and serve him in sincerity and in truth; and put away the gods which your fathers served beyond the River, and in Egypt; and serve ye Jehovah. [15] And if it seem evil unto you to serve Jehovah, choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your fathers served that were beyond the River, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: but as for me and my house, we will serve Jehovah. [16] And the people answered and said, Far be it from us that we should forsake Jehovah, to serve other gods; [17] for Jehovah our God, he it is that brought us and our fathers up out of the land of Egypt, from the house of bondage, and that did those great signs in our sight, and preserved us in all the way wherein we went, and among all the peoples through the midst of whom we passed; [18] and Jehovah drove out from before us all the peoples, even the Amorites that dwelt in the land: therefore we also will serve Jehovah; for he is our God. [19] And Joshua said unto the people, Ye cannot serve Jehovah; for he is a holy God; he is a jealous God; he will not forgive your transgression nor your sins. [20] If ye forsake Jehovah, and serve foreign gods, then he will turn and do you evil, and consume you, after that he hath done you good. [21] And the people said unto Joshua, Nay; but we will serve Jehovah. [22] And Joshua said unto the people, Ye are witnesses against yourselves that ye have chosen you Jehovah, to serve him. And they said, We are witnesses. [23] Now therefore put away, said he, the foreign gods which are among you, and incline your heart unto Jehovah, the God of Israel. [24] And the people said unto Joshua, Jehovah our God will we serve, and unto his voice will we hearken. [25] So Joshua made a covenant with the people that day, and set them a statute and an ordinance in Shechem. Deuteronomy 13:4 ASV Ye shall walk after Jehovah your God, and fear him, and keep his commandments, and obey his voice, and ye shall serve him, and cleave unto him.
If God has two different plans for Jews and Gentiles today, why does Peter & Paul, in the first century, say there is no longer a distinction? Acts 10:34 Then Peter began to speak: “I now truly understand that God does not show favoritism, Acts 10:43 To him give all the prophets witness, that through his name whosoever believeth in him shall receive remission of sins. Romans 10:12 For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him. Galatians 3:28-29 28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. 29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise. Colossians 3:11 11 Where there is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision, Barbarian, Scythian, bond nor free: but Christ is all, and in all.
God doesn't show favouritism. That's the key phrase. Even though God has different plans for Jews and Gentiles, neither is favoured over the other. It just means there are different roles. Israel is the teacher of the nations. Thus saith the Lord of hosts : In those days, wherein ten men of all languages of the Gentiles shall take hold, and shall hold fast the shirt of one that is a Jew, saying: We will go with you: for we have heard that God is with you (Zechariah 8:23). Israel is the light of all the nations: he says: “It is too light a thing that you should be my servant to raise up the tribes of Jacob and to bring back the preserved of Israel; I will make you as a light for the nations, that my salvation may reach to the end of the earth.” (Isaiah 49:6) Israel is a priestly nation out of which the messiah will reign over all the nations. It doesn't mean that Israel is better than any other nation but God wants it to be the governmental nation where the law will go out from Zion to all the nations.
@@rightouslivingthat's incorrect, God wasn't trying to Institute the law until he was forced to do so after continuous Rebellion by the Israelites when they came out of egypt.
@@TheBiblicalRoots which Jesus? The Jesus that did not abolish the Law or the Jesus of the Synagogue of Freedmen which claimed He changed those customs handed down to us Act 6:9-14 Hint: Luke was clear the later was slandering FALSE WITNESS
When you give wedding vows you are declaring I will love you whether you are sick or healthy rich or poor it is a declaration saying I will love you and there's no conditions it's a promise not a contract not a covenant which would be for me to say I will love you if you do this or don't do that
God says His law is forever. Matthew 5:17-19. Numbers 15:15 says Jews and grafted in Grntiles share the same comamnds..... Jews/Gentiles are ONE. Galatians 3:28.... The DOERS of the LAW will be justified. Romans 2:13......See James 2.... I don't follow your theology of christ. For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect. Matthew 24:24
The New Covenant = The New Heavens and earth, wherein righteousness dwells. The Church is God's masterpiece. Daniel & Revelation have been fulfilled. Christ in you is the "good land" the tabernacle of God among men.
Hi, Velomir! In Deuteronomy 28, God provides a list of blessings for obedience in verses 1-14 followed by a list of curses for disobedience in verses 15-68. The ultimate punishment for continued disobedience was that God’s people would be removed from the land and scattered among the nations of the earth. Verse 64 says God’s people would become like the pagans and serve other gods: “Then the Lord will scatter you among all nations, from one end of the earth to the other. There you will worship other gods-gods of wood and stone, which neither you nor your ancestors have known.” And the OT records God sending many prophets to warn Israel, but they didn't listen and those curses were visited on them. This is why in Jeremiah 31 God says that Israel was unfaithful and broke the covenant (Jer. 31:31-34). Best, Rob
@@TheBiblicalRoots It's the same anti-semitic attitude that allows you to say things like this, as well as "the Sabbath is a gateway drug" and "you can't follow Jesus and Moses" I'm sure it's not a conscience bias you're aware of but it's clear in the totality of your teachings. It is a form of replacement theology,,,they have received the curse and now there is the church. The very laws that we are to receive the blessings for, you turn into a curse
@@TheBiblicalRoots Your words sound eerily similar the rhetoric many of the ECFs spewed, like Constantine, you insist on separating yourself from "those detestable Jews" despite the warning against that very thing in Isaiah 56:3. The very manner of living that the Creator says we will be blessed for doing, you teach it to be a curse
@@vernmiroth1626 I don't think its me you have an issue, with, Vern. It's the apostle Paul. "Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us" (Gal. 3:13). RLS
@@TheBiblicalRoots It isn't you personally I have an issue with, but make no mistake it is not with the apostle Paul. The issue is with the way Paul's writings are mishandled per Peter's own warning, 2 Peter 3:16,17 It is with historical Christianity I take issue with, of which you are a part of. It is this historical entity that Paul himself saw coming in Acts 20:29. Those who came in and began a brand new religion, purposefully separate and distinct from all things taught in the tanakh. No, I agree with Paul that Messiah redeemed us from the CURSE of the Torah,,, which is death! That is what Paul meant by the curse, the death that He died in our place, 1 Cor 15:55_58, Romans 6:10, Isaiah 53 But in the propaganda that you want to carry on, the law in and of itself is the curse that Messiah came to free us from, which flies in the face of the words of the Prophets including Moses, Deut 30, David, Psalms 119, Isaiah 56-58, Jeremiah 9, Ezekiel 20 and of course Messiah Himself in Matt 5. No, my issue is not with Paul, it absolutely is with you and the fact that you assign Paul just a little more authority than any other biblical author. If you're anti Torah stance was so clearly biblical as you insist, you should be able to find advanced notice of the annulment of torah somewhere, anywhere in the prophets per Amos 3:7, and you don't. The only thing you can do is elevate a few key passages from Paul to prove the point you are already convinced is true. Question, I asked this in another thread that you may have missed: Water baptism, is that the shadow or is that the reality?
@@makenoimage Nonsense. If the salvation of the Jews is salvation by race instead of salvation by grace, why does John 1:12-13 (written by a Inspired Jew) say that salvation is not by blood? John 1:12-13 12 But as many as received him, to them gave the power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: 13 Which were born, not of "blood", nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.
@@georgebentonjr3876 nonsense indeed! just like the OT ONE LAW for native born and foreigners alike Exodus 12:49 the Holy Spirit having made NO DISTINCTION between believing Jews and believing Gentiles as Peter confirmed...living differing lifestyles would be easily distinguishable after all But those who receive Him become sons of God..".but OF God" and known as Israel... their faith grafts them in...their faith adopts them into inheritance...just like already in the OT when "strangers within thy gates" received the Sabbath at Sinai He demonstrated and taught His New Covenant PRIOR christening it to a room full of Jews...signing it with His blood and sealing it with His death...NO CHANGES AFTER Gal 3:15 and then told them to go and make disciples to this lifestyle of ALL nations...doing works befitting repentance from a former life...certainly less like the world and MORE like He lived... If you claim to be in Him you ought to live as He did...1 John 2:6 just as...and as His people Israel do...
This pteacher is confusing his listeners. His shallow understanding of the law makes him confused which law has been nailed on the cross when talking of burnt offering sacrifices. His explanation about God that remembered our sins no more, the reason that the ten commandments are no longer binding is a great deception. His interpretation to the word of God is guided by the devil who is the father of lies. John 8 :44, because he is lying by saying no need to keep the law of God. 1 John 2:4. That is why Satan is trying his best to look for his human agents to preach and teaching people break the law of God because he is enraged against God's commandment keeping people. Rev. 12:17.
OK in addressing the commentary in reference to what they're trying to allude to the covenants!? Are and were only for the nation of Israel only All 12 tribes, they're not for the rest of the nations of the world!? And the Savior ( YAHAWASHI) who they Ignorantly call Jesus Christ the Son of (YAHAWAH) who they Ignorantly call God did not come to incorporate a universal acceptance or inclusion of the covenants!? Psalm 147:19-20 KJV He sheweth his word unto Jacob, His statutes and his judgments unto Israel. He hath not dealt so with any nation: And as for his judgments, they have not known them. Praise ye the LORD. The laws, statues and commandments will only be for the 12 Tribes of Israel Not and Never for the Nations of the world or anyone or any other nation of people, that would choose to think they have the abilities lto be joined to the covenants of The Heavenly Father YAHAWAH through the Savior YAHAWASHI who is the representation of the almighty God YAHAWAH!!? No other nation of people or individuals can be grafted into a bloodline that they did not originate from and that's point blank period and a fake Jesus did not come to change or bring the covenants to the rest of the world!? 1 Corinthians 10:1-5 New King James Moreover, brethren, I do not want you to be unaware that all our fathers were under the cloud, all passed through the sea, all were baptized into Moses in the cloud and in the sea, all ate the same spiritual food, and all drank the same spiritual drink. Hebrews 11: 1 Paul I say then, Hath God cast away his people? God forbid. For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin. Romans 9:4 “Who are the Hebrew Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, YAHAWAH and the promises;” The Savior YAHAWASHI didn't come to offer salvation to the Whole World, He was only sent to the lost sheep of the House of Isreal!? He can't CHANGE THE HEAVENLY FATHER'S MISSION OR PLAN FOR THE DELIVERANCE AND SALVATION OF THE HEBREW ISRAELITES!!!
Jeremiah 7:20... what we do, as we are dust, IS the fruit of the 'ground'. Recall that Jesus said He came to start a fire and wished that it had already been kindled. All of what we do is tested in the fires of TRUTH of God's word. And though all a persons works might be burnt up, from that fire will come what is redeemed, even the man, though all his works be burnt up. The man himself will be saved, as if escaping by fire. That 'lake of fire' that y'all are looking for? You're standing on it. Welcome to the world of the fallen. Guess who your father is? Start a war between a father and a son, be reborn in the spirit, that you might serve God - instead of the flesh. There is no such thing as 'lawlessness' as all are under the law (Romans 2:12-14). You can 'run'... but you can't 'hide'. 😉
King James Bible Luke 21:22 For these be the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled. (This includes Daniel's 70 weeks) New King James Version For these are the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled. New American Standard Bible because these are days of punishment, so that all things which have been written will be fulfilled. Here's the bottom-line, dear Brother or Sister, in the Lord: Every constituent element of eschatology, 1. the kingdom, 2. the judgment, 3. salvation, 4. coming of the Lord, 5. resurrection, associated with the consummated End of the Age, is inextricably, inseparably linked with the judgment of Old Covenant Israel, in 70 A.D. - Fulfilled 20 centuries ago.
Hebrews 10 16 This is the COVENANT I will make with them after that time, says the Adonai/Lord. I will put my TORAH/ law in their HEARTS, and I will write them on their MINDS.”
Duet 30 10 if you OBEY the Adonai/LORD your YAH/God and keep his COMMANDS and DECREES that are written in this Book of the .Torah/Law and turn to the Adonai/LORD your God with all your HEART and with all your SOUL.
Jeremiah 31:33-34 (ESV): 33 For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, declares the Lord: I will put my law within them, and I will write it on their hearts. And I will be their God, and they shall be my people. 34 And no longer shall each one teach his neighbor and each his brother, saying, ‘Know the Lord,’ for they shall all know me, from the least of them to the greatest, declares the Lord. For I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.”
How do we know biblically that the Lord Jesus did not have long hair? 1 Corinthians Chapter 11, v.v. 12-15... 12 For as the woman is of the man, even so is the man also by the woman; but all things of God. 13 Judge in yourselves: is it comely that a woman pray unto God uncovered? 14 Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him? 15 But if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to her: for her hair is given her for a covering. Samson had long hair (as other Nazarites did) because God instructed them to grow it as such. Similarly, the 2nd commandment states no engraved images, yet when commanded directly by the LORD, Moses, et. al. made engraven images. So, unless the Lord spoke to you directly (and there are no Nazarites today BTW), a Christian man is shamed if he has long hair!
The law that they learned is from God not moses law? John1:17 for law was given by moses and the grace came by Jesus christ. God put his law in our heart .. and God he give his light or principles to isrealite, the same law he put in our heart.. God said I didn't come to destroy the law or phrophet but but to fulfill. He came fulfilled his principles ... Isaiah 8:20 to the law and to the testimony if they speak not according of this word its is because the is no light in them . .. and John 8:12 then Jesus speak again unto them saying I am the light of the world ,he that followeth shall not walk in darkness but have the light of life.
I would like to start by saying remember that when we stand before Jesus (Yahusha) (Yeshua) Our High Priest and Teacher He will know how well we love one another;and did we obey His Commandments. To the best of where my understanding is in my walk as I walk out my faith with fear and trembling. Will I fail yes, we are all sinners but we are to be a bride who has made herself ready. My pastor back in 2006 ish at Lighthouse Bible church taught me something very important "don't be a baby bird and take what any man feeds you. The Bible and your digging in study's with the Holy Spirit (Ruach Hachodesh). I don't debate to Torah or not to Torah, The Father either guides you that way or He doesn't. Heck I was a pretribber in my thinking at the Lighthouse but now I am not in the way the pretribbers understand the scripture. I have a different perspective from the wisdom God has given me. I can't change a pretribbers mind. Much less can I change one's mind to understand that a Christian is graft into becoming Israel (Ephesians 2) citizen. Walking out what Jesus taught and the Appostles walked out as well. I don't keep the commandment to tithe because I am not under the Law. Yet I tithe as one under the Malki Zedeck Priesthood. No one has been under the Law since Christ death." Death do us part" as we say in weddings. This is why the Jews aren't covered in leprosy. But in the New Covenant (renewed like a New Moon) but built upon the Rock Yeshua. As I continued to read and test each side of arguments I would seek the Holy Spirit and the Spirit sent to teach us teaches me by seeing the scriptures in a perspective of the heart ❤️ And to read in context with scriptures to back as witnesses. Take the infamous (Colossians 2:16) Therefore due to vs 14 sin, curse and death being nailed to the cross, Don't let the Talmudists judge you on how you keep the by what you eat. (If you wanna eat Hover Hog you go ahead but God lays us out a diet plan that is healthier.) Since eating God's heart way of me eating I have lost 50 pounds. Was worth giving up bacon, catfish n shrimp. God does everything for a reason. And even Noah knew what animals were clean and unclean. The story of Noah we grew up with was the first lie of the enemy the Bible straitened out. Learning 7 clean animals entered the ARC not 2. How you keep the Feast (this verse is not talking about bringing in pagan holidays) But about how the Talmudists, Circumcision group judge how you keep the Feast. I keep His Feast not a a Levite or a Jew but as a follower our High Priest Yahusha. I keep Passover as a remebrance. I drink from His cup of wine in honor eat some grilled lamb with bitter herbs and gather with Family. Easy I give up bread for tortillas and crackers for the week of Unleavened Bread. Not because the Law but because it pleases my Husband. His 10 Commandments please Him when followed. I don't need to argue the Law to know it doesn't please Jesus for me to get a tattoo. In fact I have gone through the 613 and most don't apply because of the change in Priesthood, and the in the Land ones. So it all comes down to standing before Jesus one day and saying. I don't keep your Shabbat because..... And here is the Word to back it with 2 witnesses. I don't want to have a healthy temple for the Holy Spirit so I am going to eat whatever because now even skunks are deemed clean to eat. And Jesus I know from reading that the early church kept your Feast days and not Christmas and Easter and some Halloween/Fall fest. But you know my heart in celebrating your birthday worshipping you how I see fit. I decided to change and walk the way our Messiah walked.
I cant remember if you ever got into hebrews 8 and 9. We disagree about the application of the law, but i would like to add that the most significant change from the old to the new was that Jesus became the high preist in the order of Melkizedek. This is significant because Jesus was not a levite. The preist hood changed to Jesus, the one with no end or begining. Because of his sacrifice, which was once and for all, has no need to be done again as in the human preisthood. Jesus has risen defeating death. This is why he will always be our high priest, he is not limited by death. The new covenant is different in the the preist, the temple, and the sacrifice are all in Jesus. The system is still in place, its just satisfied in Jesus. Hence not one letter of the law willpass away. Interestingly, scripture also calls us a preisthood, a temple of the spirit of God, and romas encourages us to be living sacrifices. All this to say, yes, the new covenant is indeed new and different, but the requirement of the law is still intact. I can understand the confusion, especially in regards to sacrifice. But these things solidify the truth that Jesus is indeed God. If he wasant then the new covenant would not be.
seems to me , the real difference is that the old was between God and man thru Moses while the New is between God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit. Each having His own role for the same goal. The Father promises to remember sin no more, The Son provides the sacrifice for sin making the Fathers promise possible. And The Holy Spirits role is to remind us of this truth that we have been reconciled to the Father by The Son and are now perfected, holy and without reproach "In Christ"!!!! Scripture states the old covenant was weak because of mans inability to keep their side of the deal, so God took us out of the deal and gave us the free gift of Grace {Jesus}, Who is The Covenant God gave to man!!!!!
@markhaney2884 I would disagree about the weakness of the Law. Hebrews says its weak because the priests would die, and sacrifices had to be made continually for the priest themselves and for all of Isreal. The new is better because Jesus is a priest forever, and he has no need to make atonement for himself. This is why his blood is sufficient to atone for sins once and for all and the blood of bulls and goat is not, because it had to be repeated each year. As a side note Jesus was perfect in the Law and he did it as a man, not using his place as God, giving us an example that we should follow. Where did you see that the law was weakened because it was impossible to do?
@@markhaney2884 actually God spoke the commandments directly to the people without any intermediary. The commandments were neither given through Moses nor angels but came directly from God.
Neither the law Covenant nor the new covenant is for the Body of Christ Church. Both are for Israel. Their new covenant is not yet in play, and won't be until Christ returns to earth for them. They are still in the time when "God is regarding them not. " but after those days (these days), then they get their new covenant and they get their sins forgiven. Acts 3:19 But none of that is for us.
@@mattclevenger8598 I agree, Jesus had to become the new high priest because no other human than Him could keep The Law. Paul seems to agree in Rmns 3:19&20, 8:3&4, Galatians 2:16 and he hints many places that to attempt to keep the law (= being in the flesh)and makes one an enmity of God. In Ephesians 2 he claims that Christ broke down the wall that divided jew and gentile, which was the law.
The conditional covenant that Jeremiah is talking about is the same covenant that God made with Abraham and his descendants which if we are believers in Jesus we've been grafted into that family tree we've been adopted into that descendancy. The covenant had conditions which we broke and got forew that we would break and God promised in the days of old telling us you will not fulfill these conditions but out of his mercy and grace and love he will not only keep his end of the covenant but he will take responsibility for our end of the covenant we will not obey those conditions and keep our end of the deal but God says I love you so much that I will keep your end for you in the New testament or New covenant is not something new it is just the fulfillment of that promise that was made in ancient times. Just as the restoration of Israel which we know is scattered throughout all nations to this day when that promise is fulfilled it is not something new it is not a new promise or a new deal or a new contract if you will it is the fulfilling it is the keeping of the contract that was already made from the beginning just as the new moon is not new in the sense that God doesn't take away the moon that existed and put a new rock there at least this is how I understand the text if anyone would like to expound on this or correct it or give their understanding if it's different or whatever contribution after all are we not all seeking truth
THE DIFFERENT BETWEEN THE OLD COVENANT BETWEEN THE FATHER AND THE CHILDREN OF ISRAEL , AND THE NEW COVENANT BETWEEN THE FATHER AND THE CHILDREN OF ISRAEL . EXODUS 20:1-19 , 1.And God spake all these words, saying, 2I am the LORD thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. 3Thou shalt have no other gods before me............................................. 18.And all the people saw the thunderings, and the lightnings, and the noise of the trumpet, and the mountain smoking: and when the people saw it, they removed, and stood afar off. 19And they said unto Moses, Speak thou with us, and we will hear: but let not God speak with us, lest we die. BECAUSE THE PEOPLE WERE AFRAID TO HEAR IT FROM THEIR HUSBAND OF FAITH , THE WORD/MELCHISEDEC ( WHO WOULD COME IN THE FLESH AS JESUS CHRIST ) , THE INSTRUCTIONS WAS GIVEN TO MOSES , TO GIVE TO THE PEOPLE ; SO MOSES BECAME THEIR EARTHLY HUSBAND . UNDERSTAND , THE ATONEMENT FOR THE PEOPLE HAST ALWAYS COME THROUGH THE LAW OF A HUSBAND , UNDER A PRIESTHOOD : HEBREWS 7:11-12 , 11.If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron? 12For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law. WHEN THE PEOPLE REFUSED TO LIVE BY FAITH ( MELCHISEDEC PRIESTHOOD ) , IN ORDER NOT TO KILL THEIR FLESH/BODY , GOD GAVE THEM THE PRIESTHOOD OF WORKS ( LEVITICUS ) , THROUGH THEIR EARTHLY HUSBAND MOSES . MOSES WAS A FLESH & BLOOD MAN AS THE HUSBAND ; JESUS CHRIST BECAME THE HUSBAND WHEN HE WAS BACK IN THE FAMILY OF GOD . HEBREWS 5:9-10 , 9.And being made perfect, he became the author of eternal salvation unto all them that obey him; 10Called of God an high priest after the order of Melchisedec. MOSES = LEVITICUS PRIESTHOOD = ATONEMENT FOR THE FLESH/BODY OR EARTHLY BODY = WORKS OR LAW OF ANIMAL SACRIFICE = NOT OF FAITH = NO PROTECTION FOR THE HEAVENLY BODY = STILL IN SIN BEFORE THE FATHER = LAKE OF FIRE . JESUS CHRIST = MELCHISEDEC PRIESTHOOD = ATONEMENT FOR THE HEART/SPIRIT OR HEAVENLY BODY = FAITH OR BLOOD OF CHRIST THROUGH REPENTANCE AND BELIEVING THE GOSPEL = OF FAITH =PROTECTION FOR THE EARTHLY AND HEAVENLY BODIES = CLEARED OF SIN BEFORE THE FATHER = EVERLASTING LIFE . THE WRITER OF HEBREW 8:6-13 , IS QUOTING THE PROPHET JEREMIAH 31:31-34 . JESUS CONFIRMED THE NEW COVENANT WITH MANY ( ELECT/SAINTS/144,000 ISRAELITES ) IN DANIEL 9:27 ; NOT THE ENTIRE NATION OF ISRAEL UNTIL HE RETURN TO SETUP HIS KINGDOM FOR 1000 YEARS . ROMANS 11:7 , What then? Israel hath not obtained that which he seeketh for; but the election hath obtained it, and the rest were blinded . ROMANS 11:25-28 , 25.For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in. 26And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob: 27For this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins. 28As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the fathers' sakes. EZEKIEL 20:30-38 , 30.Wherefore say unto the house of Israel, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Are ye polluted after the manner of your fathers? and commit ye whoredom after their abominations? 31For when ye offer your gifts, when ye make your sons to pass through the fire, ye pollute yourselves with all your idols, even unto this day: and shall I be enquired of by you, O house of Israel? As I live, saith the Lord GOD, I will not be enquired of by you. 32And that which cometh into your mind shall not be at all, that ye say, We will be as the heathen, as the families of the countries, to serve wood and stone. 33As I live, saith the Lord GOD, surely with a mighty hand, and with a stretched out arm, and with fury poured out, will I rule over you: 34And I will bring you out from the people, and will gather you out of the countries wherein ye are scattered, with a mighty hand, and with a stretched out arm, and with fury poured out. 35And I will bring you into the wilderness of the people, and there will I plead with you face to face. 36Like as I pleaded with your fathers in the wilderness of the land of Egypt, so will I plead with you, saith the Lord GOD. 37And I will cause you to pass under the rod, and I will bring you into the bond of the covenant: 38And I will purge out from among you the rebels, and them that transgress against me: I will bring them forth out of the country where they sojourn, and they shall not enter into the land of Israel: and ye shall know that I am the LORD. THE STRANGERS/GENTILES HAST ALAWAY BEEN ACCEPTED BY THE FATHER THROUGH FAITH ( OBEYING HIS WORD ) ; STARTING WITH ADAM , BUT ISRAEL IS THE ONLY NATION UNDER HIS LAW . THE NATION OF ISRAEL IS THE ONLY NATION THAT HE HAST GONE INTO A COVENANT WITH ; WHICH IS AN AGREEMENT TO KEEP HIS LAWS . ROMANS 2:11-15 , 11.For there is no respect of persons with God. 12For as many as have sinned without law shall also perish without law: and as many as have sinned in the law shall be judged by the law; 13(For not the hearers of the law are just before God, but the doers of the law shall be justified. 14For when the Gentiles, which have not the law, do by nature the things contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law unto themselves: 15Which shew the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and their thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another;) EXODUS 12:49 , One law shall be to him that is homeborn, and unto the stranger that sojourneth among you. THE LAWS OF THE FATHER DOESNOT CHANGE ; THE CHANGE IS THROUGH THE HUSBANDS OF THE COVENANTS , THROUGH THE PRIESTHOODS . UNDER THE HUSBAND MOSES THROUGH THE BLOOD OF ANIMALS THROUGH WORKS . UNDER THE HUSBAND CHRIST THROUGH HIS BLOOD , THROUGH FAITH ; WHICH IS REPENTING AND BELIEVING THE GOSPEL . YOU CANNOT COME UNDER CHRIST BLOOD , UNTIL YOU : MARK1:14-15 . SHALOM !
04.10.2024 Brother Solberg, thank you for teaching the TRUTH of God's Word. Very much appreciated.👑👊 Although, I do wish I had a dollar for each time you put on & took off your glasses.🤣
Sir, thank you for your work, systematic teaching is really needed in our generation and I deeply appreciate and respect what you stand for...please don't stop, I'm learning deep things from you. (from South Africa)
Your studies are sorely needed in a day of such biblical ignorance. I will be following your teachings as i find it helps me to know why i believe what i believe. :)
Thank you so much for taking the time to share with us these wonderful detailed and concise studies.
There is no truth in these teaching don't take the doctrines of this man, read the bible for your self, he's butchering the words of God,we need both faith in Jesus Christ plus the commandments of God given to us by Moses in the scriptures of liviticus, having just one won't work we need both. Look at rev. 14:12 even rev.12:17 read them with a open mind for the truth and it will set you free, this man's doctrines will send you to HELL.
Amen and great teaching. I really think you are very respectfull, loving and gentle in your way to reach the Torah keeping people. I have heard and seen many onthers who make fun and speek in a disrespect tone and that is not loving as Jesus teaches us.
So I really enjoy your videos and your loving way of teaching. Keep doing that.
Don’t get down on the same sad level as others in here…
It’s so sad How people forget to love eachother the same way as Jesus..
Jesus our savior bless you and your work ✝️🤗
Thank you, Liselotte! Peter says, "Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect" (1 Pet. 3:15).
Blessings,
Rob
@@TheBiblicalRoots exactly 😃
Except for all the times he ruthlessly insults us, sure.
Peace
I’ve never seen Rob even gently insult Hebrew Roots Heretics.
Great stuff. Thank you!
Another great teaching!
Very good video. What I do like is your adding of some additional information and context surrounding the passage in Jeremiah. Too often, the focus is in Hebrews and misses some context. Unfortunately, as much as the added context is important and beneficial, I still feel it might lack in a couple area that the objectors will raise or will underlie in their presuppositions. First, more/additional context is needed establishing that Jesus has initiated/established the New Covenant (last supper). One objection I often hear is that Hebrew Roots believers say they believe all the Jeremiah prophecy is still in the future (not yet part of already but not yet nature of the Kingdom of God). Of course, they have to reinterpret or in some cases cast away what the author of Hebrews rights. Most often I see they arguing that Hebrews author is also speaking of future not present. They do the same with Isaiah's prophecy (some versus about the messiah and some about 2nd coming -- within same section). While it is true that some prophecy has a future and future-future sense, I don't believe Hebrews can be interpreted as all still in the future. The second, more subtle presupposition, is due to denial of Trinity, their is a lack of understanding of how Jesus has to be Yahweh otherwise his sacrifice could not have met the requirements of the law and fulfilled the punishment for sin so that our sins will be remembered no more. The believe that Jesus was a created agent and not God (Trinitarian view) leads to the believe that the New Covenant is still future also and why the Old Covenant is still in affect. This has been debated for centuries, but going back to an old recent debate, the debate with James White and Michael Brown had with a Sir Anthony Buzzard and Joseph Good on the Trinity really deals with the issues. Joseph Good is the foundational scholar that most of the current "elders" in the Hebrew Roots movement point to. Buzzard and Good's argumentation can be seen repeated in current modern debates like between Anthony Rodgers and Sean Griffin and the most recent between Andrew Schumacher and Sean Griffen. Sean basically is repeating the arguments (not as successfully) of Good and Buzzard. White's recent debate with Universalist Dale Tuggy covers similar grounds. The point being if the presupposition is anti-trinitarian, then what you presented here will not be believed. Your presentation here is very in depth but starts with a trinitarian and new covenant was established by Jesus position. It would be good to flesh out what those are solid underlying presuppositions.
"THE" in 9:26 KJV is the definite article added to the original text, mistranslated "the people" and "the prince". Without the definite article the correct interpretation reads "a prince". The antecedent is Messiah to the pro-form "HE" in 9:27. The week is Passion week not the 70th week. The 70th week is the "consummation" in 9:27 that is still to come. Grammatically the consummation goes back to 9:24 the original time specification.
Dan. 9:27 reads "and HE (Messiah) shall confirm the covenant (Isa. 55:1-3) with the many (peoples, tongues, nations and kings) for one week (Passion week) and in the midst of the week (Wednesday\Thursday Passover) HE (Messiah) shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease (it is finished) and for overspreading of abominations (40 years of continued animal sacrifices) HE shall make it (Holy City) desolate (void of Daniel's people) even until the consummation (70th week) and that determined (time of the Gentiles) be poured upon the desolate (Gospel poured upon the children of the desolate; Isa. 54:1)".
idk if you interact with your comment section much but firstly, thank you! I've dealt w Hebrew Israelism (the much more aggressive, racist, hateful branch of Hebrew Roots Movement) for years and have refuted their teachings almost on my own studies the exact same way you do (nothing like a cult to make you read your bible), so I'm binging your content out of relief and joy haha. #Subscribed
So far you've covered almost every important, common point that I personally have interacted with concerning Hebrew Israelites (HIs). I just have one request concerning Sabbath that I haven't found in your content yet...and that's certain claims & rationales Jesus uses when challenged on the sabbath. I'd just like your take on my thought process on the passage(s) and the passages themselves. Feel free to respond in the comments or make a vid; I'm here for it either way! God bless and shalom.
The talking points are usually something like "Jesus never encouraged, hinted at, or broke sabbath day observance (or any Mosaic law). He didn't work on the sabbath, and if he 'broke' it, it was merely tradition he broke. If he did break one of God's laws he cannot be sinless". Lots of HIs are anti-tradition.
---In John 5, the offense seems to not lie in the healing but in the carrying of the bed. The man is "carrying a burden" which seems to be in direct opposition to Jer 17:21. Jesus ultimately gets confronted and his rationale/defense is the bc the Father is working he is working. "Working" is the same word as the LXX translates from Ex 20:10 "but the seventh day is a Sabbath to the LORD your God. On it you shall not do any work (ergon)". Jesus seems to be doing one the common patterns of intensifying the charge. His rationale essentially means "The Father is breaking the sabbath therefore I do to, bc I am equal with him" He seems to appeal to his deity to supersede the command (after all, YHWH issued it and is above it). Moreover he hints that the Father has BEEN working until this point in time, which, in my opinion, further implies the future sabbath rest with no end, spoken of in the creation account.
--In Matt 12/Mark 2, it could be argued that the gathering of grain was similar to the breaking of Jer 17:21 and Neh 13:15, but I've heard it more in line with breaking Pharisaical tradition, so we can roll with that if you want. Jesus' response was that "David and those with him broke it and it was okay. The priests themselves work on the sabbath and it's okay. Both groups are guiltless." Many liken the disciples' being hungry and therefore eating plucking grain to David's starving and being chased situation to explain why Jesus is saying they can break the sabbath, which I feel are incongruent, in all honesty. It actually feels more like gathering stick to cook bc you're hungry than David's dire situation, in my opinion. The common thread, here, seems to be related to the idea of serving God as a "priest" in some fashion. Those of God in Israel were supposed to be seen as a "nation of priests", meaning David in some capacity was excused as a priest for his faith and priestly shadow (like the linen ephod). The Levitical priests were excused bc they're serving God in the temple per God's decree. And those who follow Messiah are seen as priests as echoed by Peter, Revelation, and more explicitly in Hebrews 13:10 "We have an altar from which those who serve the tent have no right to eat". Since Christ is the temple believers serve in as priests, their work is as God commands it, when he commands, much like the earthly levitical priests. I think this is why he alludes to being greater than the temple in Matt....but I can't quite figure out what "the sabbath was made for man not man for the sabbath" namely the "...man for the sabbath" part means nor how it plays into the overarching flow of thought in Mark. I also don't quite understand how "I desire mercy not sacrifice" plays into this either, but it obviously plays into the temple somehow, I think. I guess it would be important to qualify or clarify what "lawful to do good on the sabbath" means too...He then concludes the first encounter in Matt with "the son of man is lord over the sabbath" which is a trump-all authority card that doesn't seem to warrant explaining.
--I figure whatever clarity we gain from these passages can be applied to other "sabbath challenge" passes, unless I've missed some other important line of logic that isn't self-evident elsewhere
To summarize, the points I raise in both these passages is that Jesus seems to play INTO the accusation (breaking sabbath), not DENYING it, saying he's working like the Father is or implying that even though he breaks it, he and his disciples are guiltless, like David and priests. In both examples he appeals to authority: one to the Father and being his son, the other to himself as the lord of the sabbath. I just dont follow the line of argumentation/rationale/defense 100% clearly esp when he references mercy>sacrifice and "man not being made for sabbath"...I noticed that the word "unlawful/not lawful" is not the same word used by Peter in Acts 10:28, if that matters at all. The "dilemma" for the position I hold is this, according to the HIs: he couldn't have broken it (like actually broken it, not merely some tradition) because he wouldn't have been sinless. If he did break it (like actually break it) then he wasn't bound by the Mosaic covenant while he walked earth pre-death, which makes me have to qualify other verses that I'm sure you're already thinking of....I think I tend to the latter since we've already established that, even though the disciples didn't get it, he taught all foods were clean while alive pre-cross...at least that's where I am right now...
If you read this, I apologize for being unclear or confusing if I have been, but I'd be sooo grateful for your input on this as I've been contemplating making some kind of playlist to refute common Hebrew Roots talking points and misused verses (it's swept a lot of men and women of color away from the truth). You exegete in similar fashion to me and it would be a blessing to get your thoughts. Peace and love, man
Hello, Da’Shaun. I’m glad you found us!
The Sabbath is a huge topic and, IMO, it requires a bit of nuance to grasp the Biblical NT understanding of it. We’ve covered a lot of it here on this channel in terms of why the Mosaic Sabbath is not required of Christians. But I believe the moral principles behind those Sabbath commands are still in effect: the necessity of rest and setting time aside for God both personally and communally, of remembering what He’s done in our lives, of remembering that He is the source of our salvation, that God is our ultimate provider and sustainer, that we are to tend to the needs of those around us, including those who work for us, foreigners, even animals. But they are no longer lived out in the context of a mandated seventh-day rest punishable by death.
I believe a regular period of rest is a God-ordained rhythm and a rewarding spiritual discipline, but it doesn’t matter what day it happens, and we don’t need to be legalistic about what is and isn’t work. In fact, I’m working on a new teaching in which I will make a case for Sabbath-keeping under the New Covenant. It’ll be out in a couple weeks.
As to your question, there is some ambiguity in Scripture that we need to allow for. First, the definition of “work” in the Torah is extremely thin. What exactly were the Israelites to rest from on the Sabbath? God left it vague intentionally. Second, Jesus’ comments on the Sabbath are also quite ambiguous. Every time He teaches about the Sabbath, it’s in the context of a clash with the Pharisees. And He never commands Sabbath-keeping of anyone. At the same time, we know that Jesus was sinless in His humanity, and therefore, He kept the Sabbath in perfect alignment with God’s will for it.
I believe when He says, “The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath,” he’s speaking about the created order of things. The Sabbath wasn’t created for its own sake; it was a gift of God to His people. It wasn’t given to put us in a kind of straight jacket as the Pharisees did. It was for our good-to provide rest from labor and opportunity for worship. Jesus said this because the Pharisees made the Sabbath a day of burdensome rule-keeping instead of freeing a day for us to rest from our labors. In other words, the fundamental principle Jesus teaches is that the Sabbath rest was intended to benefit us; therefore, keeping it is subordinate to the needs of those around us. We were not created just so God would have someone to observe the Sabbath! As with everything else Jesus taught, I believe the core Sabbath issue is internal, the attitude of our hearts.
Blessings,
Rob
@@TheBiblicalRoots I think we agree on the general spirit and application of the sabbath for new covenant believers: both Jewish and non-Jewish. I look forward to your videos! If you ever do a verse-by-verse study breaking down Jesus' rationale/arguments/line of thinking and what the OT references mean in the gospels when confronted on the sabbath, tag me in the comments or something (even tho I got notifications on haha). "Do not X on sabbath" followed by "I am X-ing" will definitely lean on "alignment with God's will for it". I do appreciate your trying to explain the one chiasmus abt sabbath and man :)
@@dashaunjefferies1168 That was a great, detailed breakdown = I enjoyed reading it. I agree on every point, including the questions. I have sort of come to the conclusion that as YHWH Hosiah (Jehovah + Savior = Jesus), God, Creator, Author & Maker of the covenants, He is above & beyond all the covenants & as a Davidic/Melchizedekian priest (not an Aaronic/Levitical one) He is "in service" (i.e. working) daily. So, as you say, if we are in the same priesthood as Jesus, then we are also "in service" daily. I don't see it as a contradiction (as the Torahists do), because, after all, we are in service under another covenant. But the Torahists simply canNOT grasp the new covenant part of the equation, so there is no other choice for them but to judge us. It is a rational decision on their part, as perplexing as it seems from our standpoint. Paul does say there is a "veil of blindness" whenever the Torah is read & I assume Paul means studied-with-the-intent-of-keeping as the Jews & the Torahists do. I don't want to write them off as hopelessly unreachable, but it does seem to require an "act of God" to break through to them 😥
@@kimartist Okay thanks, I try to make it a point to be clear and articulate when explaining stuff haha.
..yea, every defender of the faith against HI's/Torahists/Judaizers who subscribes to idea of being under a new, reformed covenant with God will ultimately have to wrestle w the notion of the "time of reformation". What I mean is that for a new covenant to be enacted, it must be *introduced* first--prior to the shedding of blood to *enact* the covenant. Even Moses' model follows suit: the words/commands first, then sprinkling of the people. And for the Messiah, it came while being under a covenant already; therefore, he taught the Kingdom of God during the time of the Law & Prophets. So, to even begin this time of reformation, something has to be changed, amended, superseded, removed, or added in some capacity. You cannot keep the seed whole AND have its plant and fruits come forth. The kernel must die in the dirt (to fulfill the purpose of the seed), but it mustn't be shattered (abolished and its authority disregarded). Having this role of "seed burier/plant bringer" requires him to not be fully bound by the expectations of the old covenant (in the common Israelite sense) but fully bound to his appointed and foretold role as Reformer. In this way, verses like Matt 5:17, Rom 3:31, & Gal 4:21-31 (to name a few) have this very thing in mind. They USE the law to establish their points concerning reform in how to relate to God. For example, I have found no evidence that Jesus taught to circumcise Gentiles even as an expression of faith in him, but the apostles know that that's something he purported was no effect (despite a staggering story involving Moses' circumcision). I don't think Jesus' opinions on this were introduced post-resurrection via the Spirit, much like his other teachings. He MAY have said it vaguely or in a parable or did some "remez" hinting, idk, but the point is: the friction of reform vs the currently binding old covenant was something Jesus himself had to navigate as he spoke on it, and I find it hard for him, being in that position, to be bound to the letter of the law while introducing the spirit of the law. The only legal loophole I find is that he is absolutely beholden to the spirit of the law, but relatively beholden to the letter via his previously prophesied role. Spoiler alert: this friction is mimicking his humanity & Godship as the resurrection relates the covenants in our own (believers) flesh as well, since we are "sown in dishonor" and now "partake in the divine nature." If only I knew how they "reasoned from the scriptures" or what "beginning with Moses and all the Prophets, he explained to them what was said in all the Scriptures concerning himself" looked like...
With all cults and dissident ways of thinking in religion, there's usually a changing of the definition of understood words that often will manifest as the equivocation fallacy. In my case, almost every time a Hebrew Israelite would read "law" or "lawless(ness)" or "command(ment)", The Mosaic Covenant is all they'd think of, despite context. I find that part of it is reading comprehension, part of it is lack of good pastoring/knowledge of covenant theology, but a big part of it is wanting that feeling of walking away from the culture (that you're displeased with in some regard) and toward God and feeling separate. I think all of these play a part in many's journey into Torahism but the hardest thing to reach is a feeling they hold deep. Devils uses that "disdain for the culture" feeling to work against the body--speaking from my own experience, here. Loving, genuinely, is the remedy to that "inner disgust and wanting to belong to the 'special knowledge' group" feeling. When I was actively involved in trying to pull members out and get them to see, I remember really understanding the emotional workshop they had at their disposal and how fractured God was experienced in their lives and the culture. I cried so much bc it felt like these ppl get hell on earth and then they'll go to hell afterward, leading others to do the same, bc most wind up holding (whether they proclaim it aloud or not) that you can forfeit salvation by not keeping the Law of God (as they love to reference it). My heart is very "come let's reason" toward those who are willing to hear and, as Paul would call "weak in the faith," and very "leave 'em alone; they're blind guides" toward those who are encompassed by their own "boldness." It's been years since I've actively dealt with them but my heart is still goes out to them often, even the violent camps. They've brought the scriptures and early church writings to life for me in some way, but at a depressing cost. But it's comforting knowing that online ministries and street apologists exist to reach broadly in case they want to look beyond the veil.
@@dashaunjefferies1168 Yes 😢 Just psychologically speaking, I find that people who want a hard, almost militaristic lock (& lockstep) on the things of life, often come from a chaotic background - feeling out of control - so laser-focusing on "the rules" & "the rewards" of Torah-keeping combined with the giddiness of "special revelation" about it gives them a sense of stability that perhaps they've never had before. It's hard for me personally to relate to, growing up in a relatively stable family & having a doting father - who wasn't Christian until the very end & yet somehow acted more Christian than many I've met - which made it very easy for me to believe that God really loves me & wants a familial-style relationship with me like any good father would, rather than an indifferent arms-length general-to-soldier type relationship where unquestioningly following orders is the only imperative & means of achievement. I just don't see how they can read the parable of the prodigal son (for example) &/or see how tenderly Jesus ministered to His disciples & others & not get the type of relationship He is seeking? Instead they completely skip over those & obsessively focus on the go-&-sin-no-mores & "See? He kept the Sabbath!" & narrow-is-the-way & I-never-knew-you type passages as validation of their rule-keeping ways. I wish I had the key to open the heart! But you are probably right that it's only the ones who are asking sincere questions that can ever come away. Yes I get accused of being "emotional" & a "free gracer" (whatever that is - I don't even know) & licentious & every kind of outlandish insulting thing. No, I just know what love is. That's all.
Thank you. This video helped me to keep in my faith in Jesus Christ. So much stuff online and social media to target Christians to lose faith. I have a pretty solid background and I almost fell off. I got kids. I cannot lose my faith.
true Christians can't lose their faith
Amen brother , ground your Christian faith strong before listening to thief who try to deceive you from the truth of Christ . Don’t let yourself be fooled . Question them in every way you can they hate that . Sometimes when they read a verse they add words to them that aren’t there altogether begin with , it’s mind bowing 🙇♂️
This was a really great video! Thank you for your teaching!
Another great video! Thanks again for all your comprehensive videos.
I really enjoyed that 😊
He is writing the law, Torah, on the hearts of Israel and Judah. (Jeremiah and Hebrews)
Everyone else is blessed to be a part of it.
A good bible study will show he did not throw away his people. In their Israel and Judah's disobedience, he is using heathens to make them jealous so that they will return to him.
I think that is a bad understanding. Solberg gives a much better framework.
I would love to get your opinion on New Covenant Theology. Especially in relation of the Decalogue for sanctification in light of Deuteronomy 4:13, Exodus 34:28, and Hebrews 7:12. The big question that arises if there's a tripartite division of the Mosaic Law, if so, can you exegete this from scripture. Thank you!
Dr Solberg thank you for your tireless efforts!!
Blessings upon you, your wife and your children.
I ask God to keep you and yours. God Be with you!
Bless you, Jimi! Thank you.
Rob
@@TheBiblicalRoots
*Solberg!! You've just proved that you are a liar ! The curse is only if Israel follow other gods (Jesus is a fine example of that) !*
*People, this is how you have been manipulated by the church and people like Solberg!*
*Deuteronomy 11*
28 and the curse, if you do not listen to the commandments of the Lord your God, but turn aside from the way which I am commanding you today, [w] *by following other gods which you have not known.*
*Jesus was not known to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, worshiping Jesus is against God's law - that is a key teaching given by God, here:*
*Deuteronomy 13:*
7 If your brother, the son of your mother, tempts you in secret or your son, or your daughter, or the wife of your embrace, or your friend, who is as your own soul saying, *"Let us go and worship other gods, which neither you, nor your forefathers have known"*
8 Of the gods of the peoples around you, [whether] near to you or far from you, from one end of the earth to the other end of the earth;
9 You shall not desire him, and you shall not hearken to him; neither shall you pity him, have mercy upon him, nor shield him.
10 But you shall surely *** him, your hand shall be the first against him to put him to ***, and afterwards the hand of all the people.
___________________________________________________
*Stop listening to people who manipulate God's word, the true word of God is clear and if you worship Jesus in any way, shape or form, including the eucharist or sanctifying in his name, you practice Idolatry!*
@@TheBiblicalRoots
*Solberg!! You've just proved that you are a liar ! The curse is only if Israel follow other gods (Jesus is a fine example of that) !*
*People, this is how you have been manipulated by the church and people like Solberg!*
*Deuteronomy 11*
28 and the curse, if you do not listen to the commandments of the Lord your God, but turn aside from the way which I am commanding you today, [w] *by following other gods which you have not known.*
*Jesus was not known to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob - that is a key teaching given by God, here:*
*Deuteronomy 13:*
7 If your brother, the son of your mother, tempts you in secret or your son, or your daughter, or the wife of your embrace, or your friend, who is as your own soul saying, *"Let us go and worship other gods, which neither you, nor your forefathers have known"*
8 Of the gods of the peoples around you, [whether] near to you or far from you, from one end of the earth to the other end of the earth;
9 You shall not desire him, and you shall not hearken to him; neither shall you pity him, have mercy upon him, nor shield him.
10 But you shall surely *** him, your hand shall be the first against him to put him to ***, and afterwards the hand of all the people.
___________________________________________________
*Stop listening to people who manipulate God's word, the true word of God is clear and if you worship Jesus in any way, shape or form, including the eucharist or sanctifying in his name, you practice Idolatry!*
Thanks for the clear hermeneutics. Enjoy the teaching and blessed.
As always, thank you for this!
Very well done sir.
10:37 - how could Jeremiah be talking about the old covenant when he says; quoting Hashem "a new covenant not like the one i made with your fathers"; to Israel" and as you said/noted there are future aspects of this new covenant added to the new covenant that will be enacted.
Isn't it these we should be looking out for?
btw it's the law given under the old covenant, that will be written in their hearts and the spirit poured on them to cause them to walk after his way (his law, commands, precepts, instructions, statutes). - this era we who are in messiah live in; the foretaste of the kingdom which has come and is coming; not yet fully ratified, because the resurrection hasn't occurred yet.
Torahists don't seem to comprehend that the Author/Husband of the Mosaic covenant died, leaving Him free to marry another.
He taught and demonstrated the New Covenant BEFORE He christened it to a room full of Jews then signed it with His blood and sealed it with His death
Heb 9:16-17 is clear testament only goes into effect after the testator is dead
Confirmed Gal 3:15
Is why we must live as He did says 1 John 2:6 and “love as I have loved you” JUST AS
Our standard for living is established PRIOR His death and not by subsequent teaching and practice which came decades even centuries AFTER…by man and his traditions
@@makenoimagePharisee
@@KamalasFakePolls like Paul you mean…a follower of “the Way”?
Who told Romans we uphold/establish the Law?
You’d have Him teach things He never did or practiced Himself…giving to others burdens He never carried
@@makenoimage hahahaha yeah, he fought to get rid of circumcision and then the next chapter over in the book of Acts he circumcised somebody. Hahaha good call out
@YeshuaSaves-tc6iu Comments reported to Trust & Safety for bullying & harassment.
Amen
42:30 - so what happens when messiah returns to the faithful Jews, cause it's not until his appearing scripture tells us they'll own him?
43:10 - We do have to remember the law was given to Israel primarily and they will still be ministering and functioning to the nations in the millennial reign; these laws are about how the Kingdom the disciples/apostles in the beginning of Acts were hoping would be restored post haste.
43:36 - Sha'ul spoke on this; the jews are to remain jews and the gentile believers are to remain gentile; the law stands for those it is applicable to, depending on the level of holiness they are called to.
🤔🤔 How Yehovah deals w/ sin isn't the law, but a reward; death or Life depending on how the law is carried out.
💯
good one today though
30:18 - it's being renewed, not fully, would you say? as we're encouraged daily to so; wehave to put that work of faith in w/ the aid of the spirit, no?
You really hit a home run with this video. Good information.
Christ IS Israel! I resisted this at first but as I continued to suspend my rejection of it until I could study it I finally realized it, and so clear to see and can not un-see it now! If you're IN Christ you're part of Israel because He IS Israel! Israel as a people existed to be the delivery system of the Messiah to the world. 'All the families of the earth' have been blessed by God IN Christ as promised to Abraham and we're heirs according to that promise! Israel was also a 'type' with Christ being the 'anit-type' in so many ways it's magical!
Israel was rebellious and forgetful and ungrateful. What you call magic is really being bewitched. Jesus is Messiah, the bridegroom, the Lamb of God, the door, the temple, the bread of life, and the living water; but Jesus is not Israel. You are making stuff up.
@Say-hey24 well Paul said that if you’re in Christ, then you are saved. He also said that Jews, who rejected Christ could be grafted back in. And he also said, therefore, all Israel will be saved. If A equals B and B equals C then A equals C… not directly stated, but it’s only those in Christ that will be saved. And all Israel will be saved…. ❤️
@@swebb77 right, got it, all of Israel, are going to be saved. Sure, got it, crazy person.
Hello professor, can you explain the method of salvation for the gentiles prior to Jesus? For example, Ruth, Rahab, Caleb, etc. Would it have been the same or would there be a different method of forgiveness?
To clarify, I mean if the Israelites’ sins were forgiven when they sacrificed animals, would the requirement for the sins of gentiles would have been sacrifices too?
@Abbey486
You're correct. The gentiles had knowledge of sacrifices also.
Genesis 4:1-10
Genesis 8:20
Job 1:5
Job 42:7-8
Numbers 23:1-6
Blood is needed to atone for sin.
Leviticus 17:11
Hebrews 9:22
1 Samuel 3:12-14
Brilliant question!
It is a question, but not a brilliant one. The same question can be asked about Abraham, who, incidentally also was a Gentile chosen by Yahweh to be the ancestor of His people. Abraham’s sins were not forgiven because he offered animals sacrifices. *Gen 15:6* says that Abram believed in Yahweh, and Yahweh counted Abram as righteous because of his faith. This verse is the clearest expression in Scripture of the truth of salvation by grace, through faith - (*Eph 2:8*). This is the first time the words “believed” and “righteousness” are used in Scripture. No one can prove biblically that Abram, or any person for that matter, was made right because of their obedience or their fulfillment of religious law or ritual, e.g. sacrifices or circumcision. It was faith alone that caused God to account Abram as righteous. This same principle applies to the other Gentiles that you mentioned, i.e., Ruth, Rahab, Caleb. Each of these pioneers of faith were counted righteous solely because of their belief and trust in Yahweh.
*The premise of salvation was and has always been based on belief in Yahweh.* The forgiveness of sins for the Israelites was temporal as sacrifices had to be made repeatedly and continuously, year after year. *Heb 10:4 says, “It is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins.”* The only One who can take away sins permanently is Jesus Christ. Therefore, our redemption and salvation is found solely in believing and trusting in Him.
@@mrsmorgann0000 The 'New' Covenant=Abrahamic Covenant Renewed & Fully Fulfilled. The A.C.=roots of the N.C. but NOT the tree, and why Christianity doesn't have Jewish roots and isn't beholden to Israel or the Law because The Word that preached The Gospel to Abe wasn't Jewish and neither was Abe or Isaac. (Gen 15-22; Gal 3) The Word for New doesn't always mean completely new just like me being a New creation doesn't mean I have all new parts
@BillyJack-vr5cp what does 'new' mean in the context of the new covenant prophecy of Jeremiah
37:04 - new covenant ppl
39:00 - but there are prophecies that mention there are others of his fold that will come to know him, which is an indication of gentiles entering in to the Kingdom, but that's not a new concept, because Israel has always had the stranger who are immersed to whatever level they are callled to in the Judaic culture, from the Exodus from Egypt
47:08 - we form a temple for him, however the nations in the meillenial reign will need the education of the temple, hence the one messiah will build after the one to built for the Anti-christ; as it will be desecrated
Both of the covenants are made with ethnic Israel only as they are the only house hold that God chose out of all the world, but the new covenant through Christ Jesus our Lord invited Gentiles into the household more freely through faith in the done work of Jesus Christ than the invitation to the gentiles in the old covenant by Moses through works commanded to be done by Faith looking forward to the work of God in the future.
Appreciate your clear teaching.
Hey Professor Rob, The proof that the New Covenant is not in force today is that you are trying to teach us about God and such which is an open violation of the very wording of the New Covenant in Jeremiah 31:34.
And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.
Jeremiah 31:34
The fact that Christians kept teaching about God so much after the cross suggests that the New Covenant wasn’t yet in place.
And daily in the temple, and in every house, they ceased not to teach and preach Jesus Christ.
Acts 5:42
And he commanded us to preach unto the people, and to testify that it is he which was ordained of God to be the Judge of quick and dead.
Acts 10:42
And after he had seen the vision, immediately we endeavoured to go into Macedonia, assuredly gathering that the Lord had called us for to preach the gospel unto them.
Acts 16:10
Then fourteen years after I went up again to Jerusalem with Barnabas, and took Titus with me also.
And I went up by revelation, and communicated unto them that gospel which I preach among the Gentiles, but privately to them which were of reputation, lest by any means I should run, or had run, in vain.
Galatians 2:1-2
Why? Didn’t Paul know Jeremiah 31:34 argues that we won’t be teaching about God anymore under the New Covenant? Because Paul seems all for trampling all over that provision of the New Covenant here if the New Covenant were already in force back then.
How then shall they call on him in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard? and how shall they hear without a preacher?
Romans 10:14
The New Covenant says how,
“And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD:…”
Jeremiah 31:34
Under the New Covenant we will already know God. It’s a consequence of God writing his law in our heart. A key reason for why Christ gave the gospel commission in Matthew 28 is because Christ knew we were not yet under the New Covenant.
Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:
Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen.
Matthew 28:19-20
Are you going to sit here and tell me Christ didn’t know this would violate a plainly stated provision of the New Covenant in Jeremiah 31:34, unless the New Covenant comes at some point after the gospel commission was finished?
Now, I know you like this verse,
For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.
Matthew 26:28
Which is not quite the same as saying, “I am placing you under the New Covenant at this time.” Christ can identify that the above is representative of his blood under the New Testament, and still hold off on placing people under the New Covenant until some point long after the gospel commission is finished so as not to violate Jeremiah 31:34 with the gospel commission. But notice, people often miss the next verse which says,
But I say unto you, I will not drink henceforth of this fruit of the vine, until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father's kingdom.
Matthew 26:29
So, what he appears to be doing here is a type or figure pointing to a much later future fulfillment. Likely what he is referencing here in Luke 22.
Ye are they which have continued with me in my temptations.
And I appoint unto you a kingdom, as my Father hath appointed unto me;
That ye may eat and drink at my table in my kingdom, and sit on thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel.
Luke 22:28-30
So, it is far more likely that Christ was suspending the New Covenant until well into our future.
Hey Rob, do you have any social media I can talk to you on? I have lots of questions about Hebrew roots and your view also. If not that’s okay. Thank you!
-Durst
It clearly says the new covenant will be written down in your heart to keep my word . Stop making up crap .
Question: is the law in the old covenant changed in the new covenant? If yes, what law from old covenant is replaced by what law in the new covenant? Does it include the 10 commandments? Thanks.
Jer. 31:32 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the LORD:
The version you study says "like" The Bible says "according to" H5921 al, and is used throughout the old Testament. I challenge you to find one other mention of H5921 al, where it could be reasonably appropriate to render that word as "like" in translation. If Jeremiah meant like he would have used: H251, 1571,1819, 1821, 1823, 1825, 1922, 2088, 2421, 2654, 3644. 3651, 4911, 4711, 4915, 5973, 5974, 7737
Heb. 9:12 Neither by the blood of goats and calves, but by his own blood he entered in once into the holy place, having obtained eternal redemption for us.13 For if the blood of bulls and of goats, and the ashes of an heifer sprinkling the unclean, sanctifieth to the purifying of the flesh:
Matt 26:28 For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.
According to the blood of sacrificed bulls to the covenant at Sinai, according to the blood of Christ for the new Covenant. Not according to the blood of bulls, but according to the blood of Christ.
New does not mean different. If YHVH wanted Jeremiah to tell us he was going to make a different covenant, novel from the first, he likely would have used H1278 beriyah or it's root H1254 bara. Only by context in Hebrew are we given a clue to the intent of the author. As you already pointed out in this video, Same words written on parchment, now written on our hearts. Not most or some of YHVH's words, and not his words with many or few changes. Not these words of YHVH on these people, and those words of YHVH on those people, those things are all imagined by the hearts of men. Here's a shadow picture you may have missed from the Old Testament:
Exodus 34:1 And the LORD said unto Moses, Hew thee two tables of stone like unto the first: and I will write upon these tables the words that were in the first tables, which thou brakest.
The same words that were on the first set of tablets. He did not say well let's leave out that second one because obviously you people were not able to keep that one. God doesn't change, you are trying to separate God from Jesus from the Word, that's unbiblical.
I would break down and dismantle your every little thing in this video, but your whole starting point is faulty.
God doesn't change
Keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.
Peace
You are absolutely correct.
Hello, if I may ask a question, if someone asks to be saved and continues to practice a sin (pornography, or drugs, or adultery, etc..) not stumble with sin like someone who is trying but messes up, is the person practicing sin truly saved? Like are they saved by Grace, or is faith without works dead, or did they not actually mean it when they asked to be saved?
I feel Holy Ghost on me when this brother teaches
Ok I’ll play Devil’s advocate
Tell me then why is it not the 10 commandments that are written on our hearts as that set of laws had no sacrificial requirements
Would I be right to say the laws “10comandments” are the ones written on our hearts and which then makes a case for keeping the sabbath as it is the only neglected law amongst the 10 ?
I am asking seeking understanding not a fight please understand
“Love the Lord your God with all your heart, all your soul, and all your mind” and “Love your neighbor as yourself” sums up 9 of the 10 Commandments. The Sabbath was not forgotten. We have our Sabbath every day through Jesus sacrifice. Christians can rest in Christ's finished work on the cross and find true Sabbath rest by coming to him.
@@SinclairHugh
The Sabbath is forever .
Many passages prove so .
The best best one .
Isaiah 66:23 (KJV)
And it shall come to pass, [that] from one new moon to another, and from one sabbath to another, shall all flesh come to worship before me, saith the LORD.
God's standards do not change to suit people. People have to change to suit God's standards
22:20 - so are you saying the New covenant comes into effect after the millennial reign of Yeshua HaMashiach?
Please review, because the B'rit Chadasha will be what will define the millenial reign... then it will be said; "a place of unwalled villages",
24:48 - yes it will be unconditional because they will be made to walk after his ways by the full operation of the Holy Spirit; they will be obedient.
26:40 - glad you cleared that up
Hi Rob... I see the new covenant speaking to regeneration not glorification, and that is one of the many reasons I believe the prophetic fulfillment is completed at the return of Christ when the elect nation of Israel is restored to God. Blessings
'I see' - 'I believe' BLAAAAAAAAAAH
Unfortunately, there are a number of problems with how Christians try to explain instituting the New Covenant that need to be addressed here, and not conveniently passed over as is often the case. Since you started with verse 27, let’s begin reading from there.
Jer 31:27
Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will sow the house of Israel and the house of Judah with the seed of man, and with the seed of beast.
Jer 31:28
And it shall come to pass, that like as I have watched over them, to pluck up, and to break down, and to throw down, and to destroy, and to afflict; so will I watch over them, to build, and to plant, saith the LORD.
Jer 31:29
In those days they shall say no more, The fathers have eaten a sour grape, and the children's teeth are set on edge.
This is the same idea God says he will get rid of in Ezekiel 18:1-4, clarifying why the idea of sin transfer doesn’t work, because in righteous judgment the only one who can die for a sin is the one who committed it. Yet, Christians teach that Christ can falsely be judged and punished for their sins, nevermind how their misunderstanding of Christ’s going to the cross makes God into an unrighteous judge to even propose such injustice. In essence, before the New Covenant comes into play, God will first have to clear upfor us how righteous judgment actually works as God concludes here, saying,
Jer 31:30
But every one shall die for his own iniquity: every man that eateth the sour grape, his teeth shall be set on edge.
The same conclusion God essentially reaches in Ezekiel 18:4. So, ideas of Christ paying for your sins are out. It will never fly with God. It was condemned under Old Covenant law, it is being condemned here as God heads into the New Covenant. So, if you don’t understand why Christ could not have paid for your sins, you have not passed beyond the prerequisite to the New Covenant here, because you have not grasped why the proverb of the sour grapes is a mockery of justice. It turns out that you have to discern what the real remedy is for sins, and God spends the entire chapter of Ezekiel 18 clearing up that mess for anyone truly interested in what God has to say on the subject. But, it isn’t a solution a lot of Christians want to hear, and God even insists you will say his ways are unequal until you learn how righteous judgement truly works and start to agree with him on the matter. God can actually forgive sins, and Christ was doing that left and right long before the cross, so the whole idea of making Christ pay for sins is done by those who secretly believe God is merciless as a judge and cannot forgive sins. Next, after clearing up the above issue, God will be able to move us towards this idea of the New Covenant.
Jer 31:31
Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:
Anywhere else throughout the Old Testament, Gentile Christians not wanting to run the risk of ideas applying to them would say God is only speaking to literal Israel and literal Judah when acknowledging them like this, but if they say that here, they screw themselves out of having access to participate under the New Covenant. Let’s be clear, once we open pandorah’s box and start insisting God is also speaking to Gentiles here as Spiritual Israel, we can’t conveniently go back and use the excuse that the other things God says to Israel and Judah only apply to literal Israel and literal Judah to close pandorah’s box. Because God clarifies below even further who he is speaking to, saying,
Jer 31:32
Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the LORD:
Keep in mind, the Gentile Christians cannot claim that the “father’s God is speaking of above are their blood relative fathers without opening a huge can of worms here. So, again, if this is to be taken spiritually, and not literally, then the Old and New Covenants both must apply to more than literal Israel and literal Judah, else this clarification above would bar Gentiles access to the New Covenant. Notice, nowhere in the wording of the New Covenant does it ever claim God has necessarily abolished the Old Covenant by introducing this New Covenant either. Such an abolishing would be in direct opposition to what the angel of the Lord in Judges 2 claims, concerning never breaking the Old Covenant between God and his people.
Jer 31:33
But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people.
Notice, God does not say he is writing a new law in our heart. That’s critical, because a lot of people will like to claim this is some kind of vague “new law”, or even no law at all, but grace, faith and all kinds of crap that is not even mentioned here. The Hebrew word here is “torah” which is much bigger than the assumed “Law of Moses” in that Torah would clearly mean all five of the books from Genesis to Deuteronomy. This is why later in Jeremiah 33, we find that the Levites won’t fail to have a man who makes offerings before God in the coming Davidic kingdom, because Levitical law is not abolished, but quite restored under the New Covenant. Proof of this can be found in Zechariah 14 as we observe Gentile nations like Egypt keeping Tabernacles. Gentile nations like Egypt never kept Levitical feasts like Tabernacles before, but these provisions of Torah become more universal over Gentile nations the moment you open Pandorah’s box and bring the Gentiles under this covenant. Same with the circumcision of flesh and heart in Ezekiel 44 which will be required in order for Gentiles to enter the temple of the Davidic kingdom as well. In fact, Ezekiel 44-46 reintroduces all kinds of provisions concerning Levites, Levitical feasts, sabbaths, new moons and so on in the future Davidic Kingdom and its temple.
This next provision creates a problem when Christians attempt to say Christ was instituting the New Covenant in the gospels.
Jer 31:34
And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.
So, why are Christians who insist they are under the New Covenant still teaching people about God today if that is completely unnecessary under the stated provisions of the New Covenant? Christ didn’t claim his disciples shall “teach no more”, like the New Covenant claims above, but instead Christ in Matthew 28 sent his disciples out to teach all nations about God and his kingdom. This is because Christ knew we will not be under the New Covenant until after the gospel commission has completed. You see, the Old Covenant covers the time we spend in this old earth, and the New Covenant is not introduced until we enter the New Earth.
This becomes even more evident by the next problem we face in verse 35-36.
Jer 31:35
Thus saith the LORD, which giveth the sun for a light by day, and the ordinances of the moon and of the stars for a light by night, which divideth the sea when the waves thereof roar; The LORD of hosts is his name:
Jer 31:36
If those ordinances depart from before me, saith the LORD, then the seed of Israel also shall cease from being a nation before me for ever.
This provision of the New Covenant explains precisely why it would be dangerous to institute the New Covenant back at the time of Christ’s first coming. This detail from Revelation 21 states that in our future the sun and moon are no longer around which would rapidly lead to the unfortunate outcome mentioned in the above section of the New Covenant concerning Israel ceasing as a nation before God.
Rev 21:23
And the city had no need of the sun, neither of the moon, to shine in it: for the glory of God did lighten it, and the Lamb is the light thereof.
Ooops! This means the sun and moon which God is speaking about in the New Covenant are obviously ordinances which come later, and John here is seeing the New Jerusalem at a time when there is no sun or moon present. So, to introduce the New Covenant before the fulfillment of Revelation 21 would be utterly disasterous for the nation of israel.
Hey Rob. I have one question. Why does James specifically call out to the 12 tribes of Israel in his opening statement? The reason being is many would say this is the church but isnt that a poor interpretation? Hes quite direct. My assumption is hes addressing the literal tribes which were scattered abroad. I thought this identity was lost for hundreds of years at this point.
Abba Father shall bring them back according to the scriptures. His promises are Yes and Amen. They must first wake up from the slumber He (Yahuah)put them in first, they must repent from sin.
@MelaninWay Sorry I don't mean to be rude but I don't believe those so called have anything to do with the ones mentioned in the Bible
@@mdcxi1611 Yes I get what u saying and that is so! I'm talking about the 12 tribes, there's only one nation called Israelites, those I assume u thought I was talking about are not the ones obviously, they call themselves Isaeli... (Check the spelling also) For they know very well that they aren't! Read Rev.3:9
I think your assumption of literal tribes is correct. Perhaps James is writing to his fellow Jewish believers in Jesus who are living in the Dispersion. [By this point, the synagogue system had grown large outside Israel, as evidenced in Acts where Paul is mentioned preaching the Gospel in SEVEN named cities' synagogues.] BTW, in Luke 2:36, Anna is mentioned as a descendant of Asher [one of the so-called lost tribes]. Jesus mentions the 12 tribes in Matt 19:28 (& Luke 22:30). Paul mentions the 12 tribes in Acts 26:7. Hope this helps. 😊
Some of Israel was “scattered” to Judea (Judah), they weren’t all scattered abroad, the portion of Israel that scattered to the nations, melted into the nations, and are now, no more.
@35:39 it's impossible to break this " New covenant " because it's not a covenant it is a promise from God to keep our end of the covenant which we break. A covenant is like a contract that is two-sided we're both parties have an obligation to perform or provide specific things in order to have a deal with each other to have relationship with one another in good standing. A promise is a one-sided declaration saying I will do this in a promise does not have conditions. And that's why it's impossible to break this " new " covenant because it's not a covenant and a failure for us to distinguish between the two can cause confusion and deception and misunderstanding
"After the supper he took the cup, saying, 'This cup is the NEW COVENANT in MY BLOOD, which is poured out for you.'"
~ Luke 22 : 20
Thanks!
Thank you, AD! Your support means a lot to us.
Blessings, Rob
If God writes his Torah on our hearts and Jesus says that nothing from the law will pass until all is fulfilled. And if not all things are fulfilled yet doesn't that mean we're still supposed to obey the Torah? Jesus life death and resurrection isn't a fulfillment of all things is only the fulfillment of redemption we're still waiting for the fulfillment of restoration and so the Torah is still to be followed and obeyed no? Cuz I'm getting confused cuz some videos are saying that we don't have to keep kosher and some videos are saying that the toilet is still to be followed and I'm perceiving contradiction so I'm just trying to clear it up
According to you Paul taught the dangerous beliefs of Torah-ism...... Here Are Examples Of Paul Keeping Torah:
* Circumcised Timothy (Acts 16:1-3)
* Took the nazarite vow (Acts 18:18; 21:17-26)
* Taught and observed Gods holy days such as:
* Passover (Acts 20:6; 1Cor. 5:6-8; 11:17-34)
* Shavuot (Pentecost) (Acts 20:16; 1Cor. 16:8)
* Fasting on Yom Kippur (Acts 27:9)
.
Paul and others made a Temple sacrifice for their Nazarite vow,
.
So Paul went to the Temple the next day with the other men. They had already started the purification ritual, so he publicly announced the date when their vows would end and sacrifices would be offered for each of them. Acts 21:26
.
.
Paul kept the Sabbath
Acts 18:4 - And he (Paul) reasoned in the synagogue every Sabbath, and persuaded the Jews and the Greeks.(Gentiles)
.
.
Paul taught that a believer in Yeshua the Messiah is saved by grace through faith (Ephesians 2:8-9).
.
After we are saved by grace through faith, Paul taught that we should follow the Torah (Romans 3:28-31).
.
.
Paul followed the Torah through the help of the Holy Spirit (Romans 7:22).
.
.
Paul did not teach people to observe the law in order to be saved or justified.
.
.
That was not the purpose of the law.
.
.
He taught them to observe the law in order to honor God as they walked out the Christian life in the footsteps of their Lord Jesus.
.
.
By this we know that we love the children of God, when we love God, and keep HIS commandments. For this is the love of God, that we keep his commandments: and his commandments are not grievous. .....1 John 5:2-3 KJV
.
.
I dont have all the bible answers but IF Messiah declared the unclean, clean, by abolishing the Law of Elohim His PERFECT TORAH, Psalms 19:7, Instructions, Teachings for righteous SET APART living in this evil wicked world then HE SINNED by transgressing Deut 4:2 AND that would make Isaiah a False Prophet for making this end time prophesy of Messiahs return ….. Isaiah 66:15-17
.
For, behold, the LORD will come with fire, and with his chariots like a whirlwind, to render his anger with fury, and his rebuke with flames of fire.
.
16 For by fire and by his sword will the LORD plead with all flesh: and the slain of the LORD shall be many.
.
17 They that sanctify themselves, and purify themselves in the gardens behind one [tree] in the midst, eating swine's flesh, and the abomination, and the mouse, shall be consumed together, saith the LORD.
That's not Torahism, Jeff. Of course Paul and the apostles did those things. They were never prohibited or forbidden! For followers of Jesus those Mosaic rituals are permitted but not required. Torahism, however, wrongly teaches that they *_are_* required.
Remember Paul said, "To the Jews I became like a Jew, to win the Jews. To those under the law I became like one under the law *(though I myself am not under the law),* so as to win those under the law" (1 Cor. 9:20).
Permitted. Not required.
Shalom,
RLS
Somebody Has To Die
by kimartist
Somebody has to die before you can remarry into another family.
Somebody has to die before you can inherit their estate.
Somebody has to die before you can be "born again" into a new body.
Somebody has to die before you can "resurrect" into eternal life.
Somebody has to die before you can be permanently forgiven for everything for all time.
Somebody has to die.
Somebody did die.
Somebody died.
Somebody.
Jesus.
You.
"For this reason Christ is the mediator of a new covenant, that those who are called may receive the promised eternal inheritance-now that he has died as a ransom to set them free from the sins committed under the first covenant. In the case of a will, it is necessary to prove the death of the one who made it, because a will is in force only when somebody has died; it never takes effect while the one who made it is living."
~ Hebrews 9 : 15-17
The only difference between new and old is
The laws shall be written on men’s hearts not on stone ( paper ).
Asinine comment. There are no animal sacrifices in the new covenant. Jesus is the new king- priest who established the here and better min conditional covenant based upon better promises made to Abraham. Jesus necessarily established a new and better law. Your statement is the epitome of ignorance.
@
Your lack of knowledge of the word shows .
Ezekiel, Zechariah and others speak of the Prince that will give daily sacrifices .
And all Nations will come up on the Sabbaths and new moons to give worship .
Read for yourself .
Laziness is the only reason you have for not knowing truth .
@@jimharmon2300 your ignorance is so profound it’s hilarious. Rob just gave you at least 12 differences between the old conditional covenant of condemns and death, and the unconditional new covenant in the Spirit. You are not a Christian
@
Now you have made yourself a judge .
Congratulations on your promotion.
You serve your idol , I will serve my GOD .
Jesus never did away with any laws nor added to .
He only clarified.
The Pharisee added to the law .
You people are taking away from the law .
Which is the greater sin ?
@
Now you have made yourself a judge .
Congratulations on your promotion.
You serve your idol , I will serve my GOD .
Jesus never did away with any laws nor added to .
He only clarified.
The Pharisee added to the law .
You people are taking away from the law .
Which is the greater sin ?
Question: There are 24 instances of ESV of the word commandments in NT, and often we are called to keep God’s Commandments. What are those commandments being referenced? Sincere question.. not a gotcha trying to keep things straight.
Is the correct understanding that all the ceremonial laws (things dealing with purification, defilement, sanctuary, feast days, holidays, etc.) are removed- but those commands that are principal based and repeated in New Testament and have a natural reflection on loving God and humanity are still valid? This isn’t trying to use moral as 10 commandments.
The commands of God are what God expects of man. Any rule made by God, from Genesis to Revelation is part of the commands of God. However, the Mosaic ceremonies make up only part of complete commands of God. An important principle to remember is that orders that certain observances have ended are also commands of God. God commanded Peter and the Church to not call common what God made clean (speaking of unclean meats). (Acts 10). We are also commanded to not become circumcised in 1 Corinthians 7:18.
@@SolaDeoGloria713 well then the question is, do you believe in a morally consistent god?
@@ri3m4nn Of course. But the same morally consistent God told Abraham to sacrifice his son and then later He told him not to sacrifice his son. This doesn’t mean that God changes His mind or that He is confused about what is right or wrong. Instead it shows that the purpose of some commands can be accomplished. In the case of Isaac’s sacrifice the purpose of the command was to demonstrate the faith of Abraham and point to Christ. When this is accomplished the command is not longer enforced. If the purpose of the Mosaic ceremonies was to be a shadow of Christ, when this is accomplished they need not be enforced. Moreover, to continue to enforce them shows a misunderstanding of what those laws were in the first place.
Hello, James! I count 128 instances of the word "command/ment(s)" in the ESV. And to understand what is meant by that word, we need to read each of those uses in its own context. For example, in 1 John we read, "This is his commandment, that we believe in the name of his Son Jesus Christ and love one another, just as he has commanded us" (1 John 3:23). So there are two specific commandments, at least one of which does not come from the Torah. And when Jesus was asked, “Teacher, which is the great commandment in the Law?” (Matt. 22:36), He's specifically being asked about the commandments of the Law of Moses, and He responds by providing two Commandments that were given in the Torah (Matt. 22:37-40). So context is king!
Blessings,
Rob
*the new covenant begins not with**ben joseph...but with ***ben da'veed... many blessing's..🕎✝️🔯.
Thank you for dismantling Dispensationalism
Also, is there a difference between the remnant of Israel and the church?
Hi Abbey. When the Bible speaks of the righteous remnant of Israel, it's speaking of God's promise to save Israel by setting apart a remnant of Jews who would not be lost or scattered. This refers to a small number of people who remain faithful to God despite the unfaithfulness of others around them. In Romans, Paul says "At the present time there is a remnant, chosen by grace" (Rom. 11:5). He's speaking of Jews who have put their faith in Christ. The existence of this remnant is proof that God has not rejected all of Israel.
The "Church" on the other hand, refers to the entire assembly of believers in Jesus, both Jew and Gentile. So the remnant is part of the Christ's Church.
Blessings! Rob
@@TheBiblicalRoots He has one bride though yes?
One Law for native born and foreigner alike as already in the OT
Or is His House divided?
His kingdom an apartheid state with two sets of laws?
@@TheBiblicalRoots Thanks for responding. I appreciate your time.
Around the 35-36 minute mark, you mentioned that the new covenant is unbreakable. That sin cannot even break the new covenant.
Does this mean that one can hold the belief of once saved always saved regardless of how much one sins?
I ask this in light of Hebrews 10:26 and 1 Corinthians 5 and Church discipline described in Matthew 18.
👍Once Saved Aways Saved for the Church.
>>> Israel is not the Church
@@fernandodeleon4115 the Church is not Israel?
So He has two brides?
Yes one in heaven, which is the Church = Rev 19:7
and one on earth, which is Future Israel believers = Matthew 22:1-14, this will take place some time after the Rapture of the Church.
@@fernandodeleon4115 lol…
So the standard is not one man one wife?
But here you claim He divides His love between two…following two sets of Laws as if His House is divided the kingdom an apartheid state
@@makenoimage
>>> Israel is not the Church
46:48 yep, it's weird, it's like you always got to spin it at the last second. Misrepresenting syncretism in Colossians is not honest... that verse directly connects to acts 15 which I will be giving a sermon on in a few weeks. Anyways, just got word Myles is interested in the debate. Hoping you will join him and Sam in the live debate against me. It will either be at his dad's Church (extremely liberal SDA branch), or his alma mater.
Hi, Mat! I haven't heard anything about a debate, but I was just on Myles' channel recently and we had a great discussion about specific doctrines: sabbath, law, dietary restrictions, etc. Our discussion should be published in a week or two. I think you'll enjoy it!
Regarding Colossians 2, in your sermon are you planning to mention the larger context of vv. 16-23 where Paul makes the case that, because God’s presence, salvation, and victory are revealed fully in Christ (vv. 9-15), He is sufficient for the Colossians’ salvation and there is no need to pursue additional teachings or practices?
RLS
@TheBiblicalRoots that's for the sermon after the next. This specific sermon addresses the schism in the biblical church. As for the debate, connect with him, he's apparently on board. He was raised in a very liberal SDA church (I was just there this weekend), he is part of the same conference that I am in and know his church does not have a proper view of Seventh-Day adventism. You don't seem interested in honest perspectives, so your participation in the debate would be outstanding.
Ezekiel 37:24-28 (ESV): 24 “My servant David shall be king over them, and they shall all have one shepherd. They shall walk in my rules and be careful to obey my statutes. 25 They shall dwell in the land that I gave to my servant Jacob, where your fathers lived. They and their children and their children’s children shall dwell there forever, and David my servant shall be their prince forever. 26 I will make a covenant of peace with them. It shall be an everlasting covenant with them. And I will set them in their land and multiply them, and will set my sanctuary in their midst forevermore. 27 My dwelling place shall be with them, and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. 28 Then the nations will know that I am the Lord who sanctifies Israel, when my sanctuary is in their midst forevermore.”
Colossians 2:16-17 (NLT): 16 So don’t let anyone condemn you for what you eat or drink, or for not celebrating certain holy days or new moon ceremonies or Sabbaths. 17 For these rules are only shadows of the reality yet to come. And Christ himself is that reality.
The old covenant was holy just and good, and spiritual. But its faultiness was that it lacked faith. The first covenant could be broken, but not the new covenant for those born again by Jesus' blood. Sin can only be committed by those under old testament law, whether the Mosaic or the law of nature.
""Far above all principality, and power, and might, and dominion, and every name that is named,
not only in this world, but also in that which is to come:"
The statement "this world" or "this age" was in reference to the Old Covenant age world which had not yet ended, and the statement "that (age, world) which is to come" was a reference to the New Covenant age world, which would abide and follow the end of the Old Covenant age world.
The "Last days" in Scripture, therefore, never apply to the Christian age, but always to the closing period of the OC Jewish age, which ran from the His earthly ministry to the fall of Jerusalem in the first century during the Parousia, in 70 A.D.
- Fulfilled.
It's called prophetic dualism, like that's such a basic concept of christianity. Christ still has to return, they're still sitting in the world, we still have to deal with sin in our gates, so he's not been eradicated.
@Animalsandwildlife.7527 hilarious and true, but he's a preterist which means he doesn't believe it was fully nailed on the cross, just that the second coming was fulfilled at the destruction of the temple.
@Animalsandwildlife.7527 Was salvation complete at the cross?
(Many years after the cross,
the apostles did not say they had salvation yet, but that their salvation was soon to come).
Acts 3:19-21 "That your sins may be blotted out, when the times of refreshing shall come from the presence of the Lord; and he shall send Jesus Christ.. whom the heaven must receive until the times of restitution of all things (cf. Luke 21:22,32), which God hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets since the world began (cf. Rev. 10:7)."
1 Peter 1:5,
"Who are kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation ready to be revealed in the last time."
1 Peter 1:9-10, "Receiving the end of your faith, even the salvation of your souls. Of which salvation the prophets have enquired and searched diligently, who prophesied of the grace that should come unto you:"
Hebrews 9:28, "So Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many; and unto them that look for him shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation."
Romans 13:11, "…for now is our salvation nearer than when we believed."
1 Thessalonians 5:8, "But let us, who are of the day, be sober, putting on the breastplate of faith and love; and for an helmet, the hope of salvation."
Hebrews 1:14, "Are they not all ministering spirits, sent forth to minister for them who shall be heirs of salvation?"
Revelation 12:10, "And I heard a loud voice saying in heaven, Now is come salvation, and strength, and the kingdom of our God, and the power of his Christ: for the accuser of our brethren is cast down, which accused them before our God day and night." (I believe that when the Kingdom of God came, consummated, eternal righteousness & salvation came).
Philippians 1:19, "For I (Paul) know that this shall turn to my salvation through your prayer, and the supply of the Spirit of Jesus Christ."
Philippians 2:12, "Wherefore, my beloved, as ye have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling."
Sins were not blotted out until the second coming of Christ.
Redemption was not at the cross, but was looked at as still future:
Luke 21:28, "And when these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads; for your redemption draweth nigh."
Romans 8:23, "...even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body." (From the dominion of the body of sin -
Rom.6:6-9).
Ephesians 1:14, "Which is the earnest of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession, unto the praise of his glory."
Answer: The beginning of the end started at the cross. Salvation did start at the cross, but complete salvation came only at the second coming of Christ, in the last days.
- Fulfilled in the first century.
Matthew 10:23
[23] But when they persecute you in this city, flee ye into another: for verily I say unto you, Ye shall not have gone over the cities of Israel, till the Son of man be come.
Matthew 16:27-28
[27] For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every man according to his works. [28] Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom.
Mark 9:1
[1] And he said unto them, Verily I say unto you, That there be some of them that stand here, which shall not taste of death, till they have seen the kingdom of God come with power.
1 Peter 4:7
[7] But the end of all things is at hand: be ye therefore sober, and watch unto prayer.
James 5:7-8
[7] Be patient therefore, brethren, unto the coming of the Lord. Behold, the husbandman waiteth for the precious fruit of the earth, and hath long patience for it, until he receive the early and latter rain. [8] Be ye also patient; stablish your hearts: for the coming of the Lord draweth nigh.
WE ARE NOT IN THIS NEW COVENANT, ARE YOU GUYS NOT READING? IT'S 100 THINGS WRONG WITH THINKING WE'RE IN THIS COVENANT...
HE'S LITERALLY STILL ATTEMPTING TO TEACH THE WORD OF GOD WHEN UNDER THIS COVENANT YALL SHOULD "KNOW HIM"
(TO KNOW HIM IS TO KNOW HIS WORD) PPL LOVE TO OVERLOOK PARTS OF THE BIBLE TO FIT THEIR LIFE STYLE, AND ALL THAT'S DOING IS HURTING THEM.
It’s simple:
6:23 Jeremiah 31:33 But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my TORAH in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people.
Yup…doesn’t say My NEW Law or SOME of My Law or MOST of
My Law
as if He has divided house
And just like the OT it remains for ALL who reside in Him
Numbers 15:29You shall have the same TORAH for the one who acts in error, whether he is a native-born Israelite or a foreigner residing among you. 30But the person who sins defiantly, whether a native or foreigner, blasphemes the LORD. That person shall be cut off from among his people.
Makes sense as His are a blessing to ALL people and His House a House of prayer for ALL nations.
The new Jerusalem was built by Herod and the kings highway was made of pure gold. Smh
Keep in mind that the seventy weeks were determined upon "thy people and thy holy city", and that by the end of the seventy weeks, the city and the sanctuary would be destroyed.
This was fulfilled in A.D. 70.
We are not waiting today for the temple to be rebuilt today,
simply so that it can be destroyed, as it has already happened!
Also, by the end of this period, the 'sacrifice and the oblation' (Dan 9:27) were to cease.
This, too, was accomplished in A.D. 70.
We are not waiting today for the sacrifices to start again, simply so that they can stop,
as this has already happened!
In further confirmation, Daniel 9:24 lists six specific things that would be accomplished by the end of this period, all of which have been fulfilled.
In confirmation of the fulfillment, it reads,
"Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to:"
1. "Finish the transgression," -
This was fulfilled. (Luke 11:47-51; Matt 23:29-32; Matt 21:33-45)
2. "Make an end of sins," -
This was fulfilled. (John 1:29; Matt 1:21; Acts 10:43; Hebrews 9:26)
3. "Make reconciliation for iniquity," -
This was fulfilled. (II Cor 5:18-21; Hebrews 2:17; Col 1:20; Romans 5:10)
4. "Bring in everlasting righteousness," -
This was fulfilled. (Romans 3:25,26; Hebrews 9:12; II Thess 2:16; II Cor. 9:9)
5. "Seal up vision and prophecy," -
This was fulfilled. (Hebrews 1:1-2; John 1:1; II Peter 1:19-21)
6. "Anoint the most holy (or holy place),"-
This was fulfilled. (Matthew 3:15-17; Luke 4:18; Acts 4:26,27; 10:38)
Interestingly, Christ, in response to the question of how many times a man should forgive his brother, responded by saying, "until seventy times seven," which is the exact amount of time in Daniel's seventy weeks. (490)
The implication being that there was an end to Christ's patience with His nation.
Christ fulfilled the covenant that they broke well over 490 'times'.
That is not necessarily to say that Christ was saying after 'seventy sevens' we should not forgive, but that, simply, "seventy weeks (were) determined upon (Daniel's) people."
Therefore, we can see that the desolation of Jerusalem in A.D. 70
fulfilled the prophecies of Daniel chapter nine, against the perverse generation that rejected the Lord and his Anointed.
Christ judged the nation with desolation and took away the kingdom of God and gave it to a nation bringing forth fruits (Matthew 21:43), which is the nation of believers (Christians).
The "days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled" spoken of can be no other than the fulfillment of Daniel's seventy weeks with the Desolation of Jerusalem in A.D. 70.
Therefore, the desolation of Palestine in A.D. 66-73 was the fulfillment of Daniel's 70th week, and the end of any temporal 'Nation of God'.
This is why the wisdom statement of 70x7 is one of my favorites in all of scripture.
Basically, forgive as I would forgive you . . . . 490.
Amen my friend ❤
what a load of nonsense, why then are we still here if all was fulfilled
Always points back to the law - because the law is light and is good for converting the soul.
Jerimiah 31
33“But this is the covenant I will make with the house of Israel after those days, declares the LORD.
>>I will put My law in their minds and inscribe it on their hearts.
Which other covenant cancelled the prior one?
Did Noah’s cancel Adam’s?
Abraham’s cancel Noah’s?
Moses’ cancel Abraham’s?
Who said anything about a covenant being canceled?
RLS
@@TheBiblicalRoots well let me be more specific…it’s popular opinion that much from the old has been “done away with”…I’m proposing it’s much less than what is claimed
in one covenant His people eat a certain diet and then in the new covenant they don’t …
If in one covenant they keep to His calendar His festivals and in the new covenant they don’t
In one covenant He alone is Immortal and in the new one He has 2 others equal to Him
In one covenant the dead know nothing and in the new one the dead go multiple places for multiple reasons
In one covenant images were prohibited and yet in the new covenant they’re expected
And so it goes…the first seems cancelled…
Never mind He taught and demonstrated this New Covenant prior His death
and evidence of any claimed changes prior His death (or even in the 40 days He was with them after His resurrection) is much less compelling or clear than when the terms of the old one when it was established at Sinai…
@@TheBiblicalRoots
*Solberg!! You've just proved that you are a liar ! The curse is only if Israel follow other gods (Jesus is a fine example of that) !*
*People, this is how you have been manipulated by the church and people like Solberg!*
*Deuteronomy 11*
28 and the curse, if you do not listen to the commandments of the Lord your God, but turn aside from the way which I am commanding you today, [w] *by following other gods which you have not known.*
*Jesus was not known to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, worshiping Jesus is against God's law - that is a key teaching given by God, here:*
*Deuteronomy 13:*
7 If your brother, the son of your mother, tempts you in secret or your son, or your daughter, or the wife of your embrace, or your friend, who is as your own soul saying, *"Let us go and worship other gods, which neither you, nor your forefathers have known"*
8 Of the gods of the peoples around you, [whether] near to you or far from you, from one end of the earth to the other end of the earth;
9 You shall not desire him, and you shall not hearken to him; neither shall you pity him, have mercy upon him, nor shield him.
10 But you shall surely *** him, your hand shall be the first against him to put him to ***, and afterwards the hand of all the people.
___________________________________________________
*Stop listening to people who manipulate God's word, the true word of God is clear and if you worship Jesus in any way, shape or form, including the eucharist or sanctifying in his name, you practice Idolatry!*
The covenant between God and man has always been the same. It has always depended upon God and not upon man. In Gen. 3:15 He alludes to the ministry of Jesus. In Genesis 15 God walks between the animals that had been cut in two by Himself, signifying that He was the only person upon which this covenant depended. In every instance when God interacts with man the presumption was that it was impossible for man to save himself--God had to save him. This is even true in the Mosaic covenant because God made provision in this covenant for atonement on a regular basis. All of these covenants are different perspectives on the same truth: man cannot save himself and God has a plan to save him!
😂
40:14 hahhaa Planes Trains and Automobiles... filmed right here in Gowanda!
There is a deeper meaning behind the modes of transportation used, there are a lot of videos I've put out that explain why. The path goes in both directions 'up' or 'down'... and the reason it is thru the desert is because of the mode of 'learning'... it don't matter if you 'know' the Lord or not... He 'knows' you... cause He does ALL THINGS (Isaiah 45:7)
Jerusalem means 'teaching of peace'. And 'my Father' is ALWAYS working... in the good AND the bad.
Grace allows for 'sin' and si is the power of the law. Saved by grace is the butt kickin' He gives with the 'rod'... if you won't follow the 'staff'.
Nothing has changed as God cannot change... people are just serving a God they 'don't know'. 😊
You just read that the new covenant in Jeremiah was that it was to the israelites. Both new and old covenant went to israel
The transition period of the "last days generation" was AD 30 - AD 70.
What was temporary - physical:
1. The Old Covenant written on stone.
2. Physical kingdom: the Law, the Temple, the Priesthood, National Jews and Canaan.
What is eternal - Spiritual:
1. New Covenant - written on the heart, a Spiritual kingdom, the Gospel.
2. The Church, Christ, Saints, the Word, Life and Heaven
@georgebentonjr3876
Elijah already came (Malachi 4:5-6) and died during the 2nd temple era (Revelation 11:3-12)?
When did Jesus return and defeat the A.C? (2 Thessalonians 2:4-8)
What about the crusades and Ethiopia being wrote out the Bible
I'm not quite following you, Mike. Ethiopia is mentioned more than a dozen times in the Bible, and the crusades did not happen until 1,000 years after the Bible was written.
RLS
@@TheBiblicalRoots I understand that but no one address the modification because there still many verses where Assyria was kept with ethiopa wrote out. Why is that if there both in Original texts?
@@TheBiblicalRootsI didn't mean wrote out completely older versions it's mentioned alot more but you say a thousand years later but those politcal factors clearly affected the publishing of the Bible we have today Am I wrong ? If so enlightened me I'm never too good to listen
@@tobintriplett5445 Hi, Tobin. I'm not aware of any political factors from the Crusades affecting modern Bible translations. The translations we have today are made from manuscripts that existed centuries before the Crusades, which happened from 1095-1291 CE. The earliest English translation of the Bible didn't appear until 1535.
RLS
@@TheBiblicalRoots I mentioned those dates in my comment on your recent video but if you know what was going on during those years you would understand in there about 50 writers that contributed to the KJV BIBLE all members of English church during the crusades one of the main political issues was the English CHURCH WERE KILLING NON BELIEVERS literally KILLING but that same group was responsible for the translations we have today which if you did research you clearly see differences and tell me that there was not an agenda if you choose to think that that timeline is okay more power to you I guess the English CHURCH can do whatever they want and the people that disagree are under qualified
Is the new covenant for the church or just Israel?
Hi, Phillip! The New Covenant is for everyone who has placed their faith in Jesus, whether they’re from the house of Israel or the house of Judah or the Gentile nations. And, conversely, being from the house of Israel or Judah no longer means that one is automatically part of God’s covenant people. The requirement under the New Covenant is faith in Jesus. The NT terminology for referring to the People of God is the “body of Christ,” or the “Church," or as Paul once referred to it: the "Israel of God" (Gal. 6:16).
Blessings,
Rob
Paul does not say Israel is the Church.
👉Gal 6:16 And as many as walk according to this rule, peace be on them, and mercy, and upon the Israel of God.
The New Covenant has not started yet.
👉In Jer 31:34, God will not remember Israel sins but He remembers the Churches sins = 1Jhn 1:9/Rom 6:23/1Jhn 5:16,17
👉Israel will keep His judgments and do them = Eze 36:27 but the Church can not, Look at what Jesus says to the Church of Sardis in Rev 3:1 (...I know your works...), then He says =(...but you are dead...), meaning no works/ 1Cor 3:1-4/Gal 1:6
👉Israel will enter the land =Eze 36:28 but the Church has not entered.
👉In Eze 36:25-38, the Gentile believers are not mentioned of receiving a new heart in it's context, it's only talking about Israel, look at Eze 36:36, the Gentile believers are mentioned.
God is not a liar. He will fulfill His promises to Israel in the future.
The New Covenant will start after those days.
In Hebrews 8:10 (...after those days...) is the great tribulation period, Romans 11:26,27, will support this because that's talking about Jesus 2nd coming and saving all Israel and starting the New Covenant with future Israel believers, after the great tribulation period.
👉The great tribulation is also mentioned in Jeremiah 30:3-11, in verse 7, the great tribulation here is = (that day is great, so that none is like it.). Israel believers will be saved out of the great tribulation.
@@TheBiblicalRoots does He have one obedient Wife to one Law or two with differing sets of Laws?
YOU MUST MAKE A CHOICE WHO TO SERVE AND WHO TO FOLLOW
IF YOU WANT TO SERVE LORD GOD YEHOVAH THE MOST HIGH, SERVE YEHOVAH THE WAY YEHOVAH HAS COMMANDED TO BE ACCEPTABLE
IF YOU ARE NOT READY TO SERVE YEHOVAH THE TRUE GOD THE WAY HE HAS COMMANDED, GOD SERVE YOUR IDOLS. WHY SHOULD YOU DECEIVE YOURSELF
What is the use of claiming to serve and worship the Lord God Yehovah the God of Abraham if you are not ready to leave your idolatrous and abominable and ungodly traditional believes and practices to follow the way of Yehovah by his word, law, commandments and ordinances the way Abraham deed as commanded by Lord God Yehovah the most high ?
1 Kings 18:21 ASV
And Elijah came near unto all the people, and said, How long go ye limping between the two sides? if Jehovah be God, follow him; but if Baal, then follow him. And the people answered him not a word.
Joshua 24:14-25 ASV
Now therefore fear Jehovah, and serve him in sincerity and in truth; and put away the gods which your fathers served beyond the River, and in Egypt; and serve ye Jehovah. [15] And if it seem evil unto you to serve Jehovah, choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your fathers served that were beyond the River, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: but as for me and my house, we will serve Jehovah. [16] And the people answered and said, Far be it from us that we should forsake Jehovah, to serve other gods; [17] for Jehovah our God, he it is that brought us and our fathers up out of the land of Egypt, from the house of bondage, and that did those great signs in our sight, and preserved us in all the way wherein we went, and among all the peoples through the midst of whom we passed; [18] and Jehovah drove out from before us all the peoples, even the Amorites that dwelt in the land: therefore we also will serve Jehovah; for he is our God. [19] And Joshua said unto the people, Ye cannot serve Jehovah; for he is a holy God; he is a jealous God; he will not forgive your transgression nor your sins. [20] If ye forsake Jehovah, and serve foreign gods, then he will turn and do you evil, and consume you, after that he hath done you good. [21] And the people said unto Joshua, Nay; but we will serve Jehovah. [22] And Joshua said unto the people, Ye are witnesses against yourselves that ye have chosen you Jehovah, to serve him. And they said, We are witnesses. [23] Now therefore put away, said he, the foreign gods which are among you, and incline your heart unto Jehovah, the God of Israel. [24] And the people said unto Joshua, Jehovah our God will we serve, and unto his voice will we hearken. [25] So Joshua made a covenant with the people that day, and set them a statute and an ordinance in Shechem.
Deuteronomy 13:4 ASV
Ye shall walk after Jehovah your God, and fear him, and keep his commandments, and obey his voice, and ye shall serve him, and cleave unto him.
If you don't have JESUS you dont have the FATHER, and if that's the case then you serve nothing but some rules in a book.
@@adamguy33 He's marching in an army with no Commander in Chief 😢
If God has two different plans for Jews and Gentiles today,
why does Peter & Paul, in the first century, say there is no longer a distinction?
Acts 10:34
Then Peter began to speak:
“I now truly understand that God does not show favoritism,
Acts 10:43
To him give all the prophets witness,
that through his name whosoever believeth in him shall receive remission of sins.
Romans 10:12
For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek:
for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him.
Galatians 3:28-29
28 There is neither Jew nor Greek,
there is neither bond nor free,
there is neither male nor female:
for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed,
and heirs according to the promise.
Colossians 3:11
11 Where there is neither Greek nor Jew,
circumcision nor uncircumcision,
Barbarian, Scythian, bond nor free:
but Christ is all, and in all.
God doesn't show favouritism. That's the key phrase. Even though God has different plans for Jews and Gentiles, neither is favoured over the other. It just means there are different roles. Israel is the teacher of the nations.
Thus saith the Lord of hosts : In those days, wherein ten men of all languages of the Gentiles shall take hold, and shall hold fast the shirt of one that is a Jew, saying: We will go with you: for we have heard that God is with you (Zechariah 8:23).
Israel is the light of all the nations:
he says: “It is too light a thing that you should be my servant to raise up the tribes of Jacob and to bring back the preserved of Israel; I will make you as a light for the nations, that my salvation may reach to the end of the earth.” (Isaiah 49:6)
Israel is a priestly nation out of which the messiah will reign over all the nations. It doesn't mean that Israel is better than any other nation but God wants it to be the governmental nation where the law will go out from Zion to all the nations.
@@rightouslivingthat's incorrect, God wasn't trying to Institute the law until he was forced to do so after continuous Rebellion by the Israelites when they came out of egypt.
Hi George! I do not believe that God as two different plans for Jews and Gentiles. He has one plan for all, and it's Jesus.
Blessings, Rob
@@rightousliving so He has two brides?
Obedient to contrarian sets of Laws?
@@TheBiblicalRoots which Jesus? The Jesus that did not abolish the Law or the Jesus of the Synagogue of Freedmen which claimed He changed those customs handed down to us Act 6:9-14
Hint: Luke was clear the later was slandering FALSE WITNESS
When you give wedding vows you are declaring I will love you whether you are sick or healthy rich or poor it is a declaration saying I will love you and there's no conditions it's a promise not a contract not a covenant which would be for me to say I will love you if you do this or don't do that
"You have been unfaithful to her, though she is your partner, the wife of your MARRIAGE COVENANT." ~ Malachi 2 : 14
God says His law is forever. Matthew 5:17-19. Numbers 15:15 says Jews and grafted in Grntiles share the same comamnds..... Jews/Gentiles are ONE. Galatians 3:28.... The DOERS of the LAW will be justified. Romans 2:13......See James 2.... I don't follow your theology of christ. For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect. Matthew 24:24
The New Covenant = The New Heavens and earth, wherein righteousness dwells.
The Church is God's masterpiece.
Daniel & Revelation have been fulfilled.
Christ in you is the "good land" the tabernacle of God among men.
4:18, you drop the phrase "they inherited the curses" and just move on, but those are troubling words
Hi, Velomir! In Deuteronomy 28, God provides a list of blessings for obedience in verses 1-14 followed by a list of curses for disobedience in verses 15-68. The ultimate punishment for continued disobedience was that God’s people would be removed from the land and scattered among the nations of the earth. Verse 64 says God’s people would become like the pagans and serve other gods: “Then the Lord will scatter you among all nations, from one end of the earth to the other. There you will worship other gods-gods of wood and stone, which neither you nor your ancestors have known.” And the OT records God sending many prophets to warn Israel, but they didn't listen and those curses were visited on them. This is why in Jeremiah 31 God says that Israel was unfaithful and broke the covenant (Jer. 31:31-34).
Best, Rob
@@TheBiblicalRoots
It's the same anti-semitic attitude that allows you to say things like this, as well as "the Sabbath is a gateway drug" and "you can't follow Jesus and Moses"
I'm sure it's not a conscience bias you're aware of but it's clear in the totality of your teachings. It is a form of replacement theology,,,they have received the curse and now there is the church.
The very laws that we are to receive the blessings for, you turn into a curse
@@TheBiblicalRoots
Your words sound eerily similar the rhetoric many of the ECFs spewed, like Constantine, you insist on separating yourself from "those detestable Jews" despite the warning against that very thing in Isaiah 56:3.
The very manner of living that the Creator says we will be blessed for doing, you teach it to be a curse
@@vernmiroth1626 I don't think its me you have an issue, with, Vern. It's the apostle Paul. "Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us" (Gal. 3:13).
RLS
@@TheBiblicalRoots
It isn't you personally I have an issue with, but make no mistake it is not with the apostle Paul. The issue is with the way Paul's writings are mishandled per Peter's own warning, 2 Peter 3:16,17
It is with historical Christianity I take issue with, of which you are a part of. It is this historical entity that Paul himself saw coming in Acts 20:29. Those who came in and began a brand new religion, purposefully separate and distinct from all things taught in the tanakh.
No, I agree with Paul that Messiah redeemed us from the CURSE of the Torah,,, which is death! That is what Paul meant by the curse, the death that He died in our place, 1 Cor 15:55_58, Romans 6:10, Isaiah 53
But in the propaganda that you want to carry on, the law in and of itself is the curse that Messiah came to free us from, which flies in the face of the words of the Prophets including Moses, Deut 30, David, Psalms 119, Isaiah 56-58, Jeremiah 9, Ezekiel 20 and of course Messiah Himself in Matt 5.
No, my issue is not with Paul, it absolutely is with you and the fact that you assign Paul just a little more authority than any other biblical author.
If you're anti Torah stance was so clearly biblical as you insist, you should be able to find advanced notice of the annulment of torah somewhere, anywhere in the prophets per Amos 3:7, and you don't. The only thing you can do is elevate a few key passages from Paul to prove the point you are already convinced is true.
Question, I asked this in another thread that you may have missed:
Water baptism, is that the shadow or is that the reality?
Very protestant teaching
Indeed!
RLS
So what law Gid give tovhis people isreal?
1 Peter 1:9, 2:25
First to the Jew, then to the Gentile.
(Fulfilled & constantly growing)
First to the Jew then an altered revised edited version?
As if His house is divided
His kingdom an apartheid state with two sets of conditions
@@makenoimage Nonsense. If the salvation of the Jews is salvation by race instead of salvation by grace, why does John 1:12-13 (written by a Inspired Jew) say that salvation is not by blood?
John 1:12-13
12 But as many as received him, to them gave the power to become the sons of God,
even to them that believe on his name:
13 Which were born, not of "blood",
nor of the will of the flesh,
nor of the will of man, but of God.
@@georgebentonjr3876 nonsense indeed! just like the OT ONE LAW for native born and foreigners alike Exodus 12:49
the Holy Spirit having made NO DISTINCTION between believing Jews and believing Gentiles as Peter confirmed...living differing lifestyles would be easily distinguishable after all
But those who receive Him become sons of God..".but OF God" and known as Israel... their faith grafts them in...their faith adopts them into inheritance...just like already in the OT when "strangers within thy gates" received the Sabbath at Sinai
He demonstrated and taught His New Covenant PRIOR christening it to a room full of Jews...signing it with His blood and sealing it with His death...NO CHANGES AFTER Gal 3:15 and then told them to go and make disciples to this lifestyle of ALL nations...doing works befitting repentance from a former life...certainly less like the world and MORE like He lived...
If you claim to be in Him you ought to live as He did...1 John 2:6
just as...and as His people Israel do...
This pteacher is confusing his listeners. His shallow understanding of the law makes him confused which law has been nailed on the cross when talking of burnt offering sacrifices. His explanation about God that remembered our sins no more, the reason that the ten commandments are no longer binding is a great deception. His interpretation to the word of God is guided by the devil who is the father of lies. John 8 :44, because he is lying by saying no need to keep the law of God. 1 John 2:4. That is why Satan is trying his best to look for his human agents to preach and teaching people break the law of God because he is enraged against God's commandment keeping people. Rev. 12:17.
OK in addressing the commentary in reference to what they're trying to allude to the covenants!?
Are and were only for the nation of Israel only All 12 tribes, they're not for the rest of the nations of the world!?
And the Savior ( YAHAWASHI) who they Ignorantly call Jesus Christ the Son of (YAHAWAH) who they Ignorantly call God did not come to incorporate a universal acceptance or inclusion of the covenants!?
Psalm 147:19-20 KJV
He sheweth his word unto Jacob, His statutes and his judgments unto Israel. He hath not dealt so with any nation: And as for his judgments, they have not known them. Praise ye the LORD.
The laws, statues and commandments will only be for the 12 Tribes of Israel Not and Never for the Nations of the world or anyone or any other nation of people, that would choose to think they have the abilities lto be joined to the covenants of The Heavenly Father YAHAWAH through the Savior YAHAWASHI who is the representation of the almighty God YAHAWAH!!?
No other nation of people or individuals can be grafted into a bloodline that they did not originate from and that's point blank period and a fake Jesus did not come to change or bring the covenants to the rest of the world!?
1 Corinthians 10:1-5
New King James
Moreover, brethren, I do not want you to be unaware that all our fathers were under the cloud, all passed through the sea, all were baptized into Moses in the cloud and in the sea, all ate the same spiritual food, and all drank the same spiritual drink.
Hebrews 11: 1
Paul I say then, Hath God cast away his people? God forbid. For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin.
Romans 9:4
“Who are the Hebrew Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, YAHAWAH and the promises;”
The Savior YAHAWASHI didn't come to offer salvation to the Whole World, He was only sent to the lost sheep of the House of Isreal!?
He can't CHANGE THE HEAVENLY FATHER'S MISSION OR PLAN FOR THE DELIVERANCE AND SALVATION OF THE HEBREW ISRAELITES!!!
Jeremiah 7:20... what we do, as we are dust, IS the fruit of the 'ground'. Recall that Jesus said He came to start a fire and wished that it had already been kindled. All of what we do is tested in the fires of TRUTH of God's word. And though all a persons works might be burnt up, from that fire will come what is redeemed, even the man, though all his works be burnt up. The man himself will be saved, as if escaping by fire. That 'lake of fire' that y'all are looking for? You're standing on it. Welcome to the world of the fallen. Guess who your father is? Start a war between a father and a son, be reborn in the spirit, that you might serve God - instead of the flesh. There is no such thing as 'lawlessness' as all are under the law (Romans 2:12-14). You can 'run'... but you can't 'hide'. 😉
King James Bible
Luke 21:22
For these be the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled. (This includes Daniel's 70 weeks)
New King James Version
For these are the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled.
New American Standard Bible
because these are days of punishment, so that all things which have been written will be fulfilled.
Here's the bottom-line, dear Brother or Sister, in the Lord:
Every constituent element of eschatology,
1. the kingdom,
2. the judgment,
3. salvation,
4. coming of the Lord,
5. resurrection,
associated with the consummated End of the Age,
is inextricably, inseparably linked with the judgment of Old Covenant Israel, in 70 A.D.
- Fulfilled 20 centuries ago.
The New Covenant is the marriage covenant. Ephesians 5:31-32
It has no last days or end times. The OC did.
Lol Preterist?
New covenant,, new peoples. Same terms.
Heart of Stone, hearts of flesh
Hebrews 10 16
This is the COVENANT I will make with them after that time, says the Adonai/Lord. I will put my TORAH/ law in their HEARTS, and I will write them on their MINDS.”
Duet 30 10
if you OBEY the Adonai/LORD your YAH/God and keep his COMMANDS and DECREES that are written in this Book of the .Torah/Law and turn to the Adonai/LORD your God with all your HEART and with all your SOUL.
Jeremiah 31:33-34 (ESV): 33 For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, declares the Lord: I will put my law within them, and I will write it on their hearts. And I will be their God, and they shall be my people. 34 And no longer shall each one teach his neighbor and each his brother, saying, ‘Know the Lord,’ for they shall all know me, from the least of them to the greatest, declares the Lord. For I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.”
You have to keep the commandments of God given by Moses, and that's the way you show love for God
How do we know biblically that the Lord Jesus did not have long hair?
1 Corinthians Chapter 11, v.v. 12-15...
12 For as the woman is of the man, even so is the man also by the woman; but all things of God.
13 Judge in yourselves: is it comely that a woman pray unto God uncovered?
14 Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him?
15 But if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to her: for her hair is given her for a covering.
Samson had long hair (as other Nazarites did) because God instructed them to grow it as such. Similarly, the 2nd commandment states no engraved images, yet when commanded directly by the LORD, Moses, et. al. made engraven images. So, unless the Lord spoke to you directly (and there are no Nazarites today BTW), a Christian man is shamed if he has long hair!
Faith without works of the law of God is dead
Matthew 28:19 (NLT): 19 Therefore, go and make disciples of all the nations,
The law that they learned is from God not moses law? John1:17 for law was given by moses and the grace came by Jesus christ. God put his law in our heart .. and God he give his light or principles to isrealite, the same law he put in our heart.. God said I didn't come to destroy the law or phrophet but but to fulfill. He came fulfilled his principles ... Isaiah 8:20 to the law and to the testimony if they speak not according of this word its is because the is no light in them . .. and John 8:12 then Jesus speak again unto them saying I am the light of the world ,he that followeth shall not walk in darkness but have the light of life.
I would like to start by saying remember that when we stand before Jesus (Yahusha) (Yeshua)
Our High Priest and Teacher
He will know how well we love one another;and did we obey His Commandments.
To the best of where my understanding is in my walk as I walk out my faith with fear and trembling.
Will I fail yes, we are all sinners but we are to be a bride who has made herself ready.
My pastor back in 2006 ish at Lighthouse Bible church taught me something very important "don't be a baby bird and take what any man feeds you. The Bible and your digging in study's with the Holy Spirit (Ruach Hachodesh).
I don't debate to Torah or not to Torah,
The Father either guides you that way or He doesn't. Heck I was a pretribber in my thinking at the Lighthouse but now I am not in the way the pretribbers understand the scripture.
I have a different perspective from the wisdom God has given me.
I can't change a pretribbers mind.
Much less can I change one's mind to understand that a Christian is graft into becoming Israel (Ephesians 2) citizen.
Walking out what Jesus taught and the Appostles walked out as well.
I don't keep the commandment to tithe because I am not under the Law. Yet I tithe as one under the Malki Zedeck Priesthood.
No one has been under the Law since Christ death." Death do us part" as we say in weddings.
This is why the Jews aren't covered in leprosy.
But in the New Covenant (renewed like a New Moon) but built upon the Rock Yeshua.
As I continued to read and test each side of arguments I would seek the Holy Spirit and the Spirit sent to teach us teaches me by seeing the scriptures in a perspective of the heart ❤️
And to read in context with scriptures to back as witnesses.
Take the infamous (Colossians 2:16)
Therefore due to vs 14 sin, curse and death being nailed to the cross,
Don't let the Talmudists judge you on how you keep the by what you eat. (If you wanna eat Hover Hog you go ahead but God lays us out a diet plan that is healthier.)
Since eating God's heart way of me eating I have lost 50 pounds. Was worth giving up bacon, catfish n shrimp.
God does everything for a reason. And even Noah knew what animals were clean and unclean.
The story of Noah we grew up with was the first lie of the enemy the Bible straitened out. Learning 7 clean animals entered the ARC not 2.
How you keep the Feast (this verse is not talking about bringing in pagan holidays)
But about how the Talmudists, Circumcision group judge how you keep the Feast.
I keep His Feast not a a Levite or a Jew but as a follower our High Priest Yahusha.
I keep Passover as a remebrance. I drink from His cup of wine in honor eat some grilled lamb with bitter herbs and gather with Family. Easy
I give up bread for tortillas and crackers for the week of Unleavened Bread.
Not because the Law but because it pleases my Husband.
His 10 Commandments please Him when followed.
I don't need to argue the Law to know it doesn't please Jesus for me to get a tattoo.
In fact I have gone through the 613 and most don't apply because of the change in Priesthood, and the in the Land ones.
So it all comes down to standing before Jesus one day and saying.
I don't keep your Shabbat because..... And here is the Word to back it with 2 witnesses.
I don't want to have a healthy temple for the Holy Spirit so I am going to eat whatever because now even skunks are deemed clean to eat.
And Jesus I know from reading that the early church kept your Feast days and not Christmas and Easter and some Halloween/Fall fest.
But you know my heart in celebrating your birthday worshipping you how I see fit.
I decided to change and walk the way our Messiah walked.
Hebrews 10:9-10 (NLT): 10 For God’s will was for us to be made holy by the sacrifice of the body of Jesus Christ, once for all time.
I cant remember if you ever got into hebrews 8 and 9. We disagree about the application of the law, but i would like to add that the most significant change from the old to the new was that Jesus became the high preist in the order of Melkizedek. This is significant because Jesus was not a levite. The preist hood changed to Jesus, the one with no end or begining. Because of his sacrifice, which was once and for all, has no need to be done again as in the human preisthood. Jesus has risen defeating death. This is why he will always be our high priest, he is not limited by death. The new covenant is different in the the preist, the temple, and the sacrifice are all in Jesus. The system is still in place, its just satisfied in Jesus. Hence not one letter of the law willpass away. Interestingly, scripture also calls us a preisthood, a temple of the spirit of God, and romas encourages us to be living sacrifices. All this to say, yes, the new covenant is indeed new and different, but the requirement of the law is still intact. I can understand the confusion, especially in regards to sacrifice. But these things solidify the truth that Jesus is indeed God. If he wasant then the new covenant would not be.
seems to me , the real difference is that the old was between God and man thru Moses while the New is between God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit. Each having His own role for the same goal. The Father promises to remember sin no more, The Son provides the sacrifice for sin making the Fathers promise possible. And The Holy Spirits role is to remind us of this truth that we have been reconciled to the Father by The Son and are now perfected, holy and without reproach "In Christ"!!!! Scripture states the old covenant was weak because of mans inability to keep their side of the deal, so God took us out of the deal and gave us the free gift of Grace {Jesus}, Who is The Covenant God gave to man!!!!!
@markhaney2884 I would disagree about the weakness of the Law. Hebrews says its weak because the priests would die, and sacrifices had to be made continually for the priest themselves and for all of Isreal. The new is better because Jesus is a priest forever, and he has no need to make atonement for himself. This is why his blood is sufficient to atone for sins once and for all and the blood of bulls and goat is not, because it had to be repeated each year. As a side note Jesus was perfect in the Law and he did it as a man, not using his place as God, giving us an example that we should follow. Where did you see that the law was weakened because it was impossible to do?
@@markhaney2884 actually God spoke the commandments directly to the people without any intermediary. The commandments were neither given through Moses nor angels but came directly from God.
Neither the law Covenant nor the new covenant is for the Body of Christ Church. Both are for Israel. Their new covenant is not yet in play, and won't be until Christ returns to earth for them. They are still in the time when "God is regarding them not. " but after those days (these days), then they get their new covenant and they get their sins forgiven. Acts 3:19
But none of that is for us.
@@mattclevenger8598 I agree, Jesus had to become the new high priest because no other human than Him could keep The Law. Paul seems to agree in Rmns 3:19&20, 8:3&4, Galatians 2:16 and he hints many places that to attempt to keep the law (= being in the flesh)and makes one an enmity of God. In Ephesians 2 he claims that Christ broke down the wall that divided jew and gentile, which was the law.
The conditional covenant that Jeremiah is talking about is the same covenant that God made with Abraham and his descendants which if we are believers in Jesus we've been grafted into that family tree we've been adopted into that descendancy. The covenant had conditions which we broke and got forew that we would break and God promised in the days of old telling us you will not fulfill these conditions but out of his mercy and grace and love he will not only keep his end of the covenant but he will take responsibility for our end of the covenant we will not obey those conditions and keep our end of the deal but God says I love you so much that I will keep your end for you in the New testament or New covenant is not something new it is just the fulfillment of that promise that was made in ancient times. Just as the restoration of Israel which we know is scattered throughout all nations to this day when that promise is fulfilled it is not something new it is not a new promise or a new deal or a new contract if you will it is the fulfilling it is the keeping of the contract that was already made from the beginning just as the new moon is not new in the sense that God doesn't take away the moon that existed and put a new rock there at least this is how I understand the text if anyone would like to expound on this or correct it or give their understanding if it's different or whatever contribution after all are we not all seeking truth
THE DIFFERENT BETWEEN THE OLD COVENANT BETWEEN THE FATHER AND THE CHILDREN OF ISRAEL , AND THE NEW COVENANT BETWEEN THE FATHER AND THE CHILDREN OF ISRAEL .
EXODUS 20:1-19 , 1.And God spake all these words, saying,
2I am the LORD thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.
3Thou shalt have no other gods before me.............................................
18.And all the people saw the thunderings, and the lightnings, and the noise of the trumpet, and the mountain smoking: and when the people saw it, they removed, and stood afar off.
19And they said unto Moses, Speak thou with us, and we will hear: but let not God speak with us, lest we die.
BECAUSE THE PEOPLE WERE AFRAID TO HEAR IT FROM THEIR HUSBAND OF FAITH , THE WORD/MELCHISEDEC ( WHO WOULD COME IN THE FLESH AS JESUS CHRIST ) , THE INSTRUCTIONS WAS GIVEN TO MOSES , TO GIVE TO THE PEOPLE ; SO MOSES BECAME THEIR EARTHLY HUSBAND .
UNDERSTAND , THE ATONEMENT FOR THE PEOPLE HAST ALWAYS COME THROUGH THE LAW OF A HUSBAND , UNDER A PRIESTHOOD :
HEBREWS 7:11-12 , 11.If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
12For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law.
WHEN THE PEOPLE REFUSED TO LIVE BY FAITH ( MELCHISEDEC PRIESTHOOD ) , IN ORDER NOT TO KILL THEIR FLESH/BODY , GOD GAVE THEM THE PRIESTHOOD OF WORKS ( LEVITICUS ) , THROUGH THEIR EARTHLY HUSBAND MOSES .
MOSES WAS A FLESH & BLOOD MAN AS THE HUSBAND ; JESUS CHRIST BECAME THE HUSBAND WHEN HE WAS BACK IN THE FAMILY OF GOD .
HEBREWS 5:9-10 , 9.And being made perfect, he became the author of eternal salvation unto all them that obey him;
10Called of God an high priest after the order of Melchisedec.
MOSES = LEVITICUS PRIESTHOOD = ATONEMENT FOR THE FLESH/BODY OR EARTHLY BODY = WORKS OR LAW OF ANIMAL SACRIFICE = NOT OF FAITH = NO PROTECTION FOR THE HEAVENLY BODY = STILL IN SIN BEFORE THE FATHER = LAKE OF FIRE .
JESUS CHRIST = MELCHISEDEC PRIESTHOOD = ATONEMENT FOR THE HEART/SPIRIT OR HEAVENLY BODY = FAITH OR BLOOD OF CHRIST THROUGH REPENTANCE AND BELIEVING THE GOSPEL = OF FAITH =PROTECTION FOR THE EARTHLY AND HEAVENLY BODIES = CLEARED OF SIN BEFORE THE FATHER = EVERLASTING LIFE .
THE WRITER OF HEBREW 8:6-13 , IS QUOTING THE PROPHET JEREMIAH 31:31-34 .
JESUS CONFIRMED THE NEW COVENANT WITH MANY ( ELECT/SAINTS/144,000 ISRAELITES ) IN DANIEL 9:27 ; NOT THE ENTIRE NATION OF ISRAEL UNTIL HE RETURN TO SETUP HIS KINGDOM FOR 1000 YEARS .
ROMANS 11:7 , What then? Israel hath not obtained that which he seeketh for; but the election hath obtained it, and the rest were blinded .
ROMANS 11:25-28 , 25.For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.
26And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob:
27For this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins.
28As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the fathers' sakes.
EZEKIEL 20:30-38 , 30.Wherefore say unto the house of Israel, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Are ye polluted after the manner of your fathers? and commit ye whoredom after their abominations?
31For when ye offer your gifts, when ye make your sons to pass through the fire, ye pollute yourselves with all your idols, even unto this day: and shall I be enquired of by you, O house of Israel? As I live, saith the Lord GOD, I will not be enquired of by you.
32And that which cometh into your mind shall not be at all, that ye say, We will be as the heathen, as the families of the countries, to serve wood and stone.
33As I live, saith the Lord GOD, surely with a mighty hand, and with a stretched out arm, and with fury poured out, will I rule over you:
34And I will bring you out from the people, and will gather you out of the countries wherein ye are scattered, with a mighty hand, and with a stretched out arm, and with fury poured out.
35And I will bring you into the wilderness of the people, and there will I plead with you face to face.
36Like as I pleaded with your fathers in the wilderness of the land of Egypt, so will I plead with you, saith the Lord GOD.
37And I will cause you to pass under the rod, and I will bring you into the bond of the covenant:
38And I will purge out from among you the rebels, and them that transgress against me: I will bring them forth out of the country where they sojourn, and they shall not enter into the land of Israel: and ye shall know that I am the LORD.
THE STRANGERS/GENTILES HAST ALAWAY BEEN ACCEPTED BY THE FATHER THROUGH FAITH ( OBEYING HIS WORD ) ; STARTING WITH ADAM , BUT ISRAEL IS THE ONLY NATION UNDER HIS LAW .
THE NATION OF ISRAEL IS THE ONLY NATION THAT HE HAST GONE INTO A COVENANT WITH ; WHICH IS AN AGREEMENT TO KEEP HIS LAWS .
ROMANS 2:11-15 , 11.For there is no respect of persons with God.
12For as many as have sinned without law shall also perish without law: and as many as have sinned in the law shall be judged by the law;
13(For not the hearers of the law are just before God, but the doers of the law shall be justified.
14For when the Gentiles, which have not the law, do by nature the things contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law unto themselves:
15Which shew the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and their thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another;)
EXODUS 12:49 , One law shall be to him that is homeborn, and unto the stranger that sojourneth among you.
THE LAWS OF THE FATHER DOESNOT CHANGE ; THE CHANGE IS THROUGH THE HUSBANDS OF THE COVENANTS , THROUGH THE PRIESTHOODS .
UNDER THE HUSBAND MOSES THROUGH THE BLOOD OF ANIMALS THROUGH WORKS .
UNDER THE HUSBAND CHRIST THROUGH HIS BLOOD , THROUGH FAITH ; WHICH IS REPENTING AND BELIEVING THE GOSPEL .
YOU CANNOT COME UNDER CHRIST BLOOD , UNTIL YOU : MARK1:14-15 .
SHALOM !
God spoke His Son be born save the world in Genesis. Where man sin
04.10.2024
Brother Solberg, thank you for teaching the TRUTH of God's Word. Very much appreciated.👑👊
Although, I do wish I had a dollar for each time you put on & took off your glasses.🤣
LOL! I wish I did, too. I'm getting to that age. My Bible is blurry without the glasses, and the camera is blurry with the glasses!
Blessings, Rob