@@musan9079 The market dictates what his salary is, if he wants £500k then he can leave Europe and play in the Saudi league. To most professionals thats something they do before retirement, most would see that as putting money before professional achievement and it’s why the likes of Mbappe and co rejected the opportunity to make such a move. His choice though…
He's allowed to earn what he is already earning now. Would you switch jobs for less money?? Besides psg was willing to meet that but his owners were ass hats on the transfer fee
agree with the first two, would like mudryk to stay around these boys and play in conference league to keep his confidence for a sustained period of time
No, Neto has injury records, Madueke can't play all games, Sterling is transfer listed, Mudryk is not delivering and there are two sides on the wing, right and left!! As long as Sancho is willing to reduce his wages to the current standard on the team it's good. Compared to striker position the team will need one more proper winger.
No club will sign Sterling.. Sancho just allows Chelsea to swap Sterling for Sancho hopefully to reduce the wage bill. And maybe a change of teams could favour both players
@@footballfan5048neto is not really injury prone more just unlucky. As far as i now its been only 1 muscle injury for like 11 games and not like reece james for example with his constant hamstring issues.
No Sancho no no no. 1 striker needed then we can concentrate on the footy. Just ridiculous that we've not bought a striker amongst all the players that came in.
Do we really need one tho? We scored 6 goals and could PLAY with a false nine or use those we have in Jackson and guiu…which both has a skillset we like in High work rate
I somewhat agree but there have been none truly available any top striker for the past couple years have been committed to Barca, Madrid (I.e lewandowski and mbappe) we tried Samu and it didn’t work out, everyone says osimehn but he is clearly toxic for the team and why are we in a rush to put ourselves in another situation when we just got rid of lukaku after all these years. We need to take our time I agree we need a striker but in that role we’ve historically made bad decisions. Lastly, NO to sancho
@@petergtterup4205I know you’re feeling good after we scored 6 but teams will change the way they play against us sitting more into a low block not pressing us high like wolves did. So not having a target man option will be a problem. That doesn’t have to be osimhen but to not have that profile even as a plan b would be silly.
@@spoots1234what serie A team is gonna want to/deserves to have to start him 😂😂 send him to the champ to humble himself and learn the english game and stay immersed in english culture
@@chull-lg7gv Mudryk has top class qualities, apart from skying the ball into the stands when he should score. The Championship is more physical and aggressive than the EPL. That's the last thing he needs. What he needs is time on the ball and experience scoring goals. That'll happen in Serie A, Ligue 1 or Bundesliga, but since most Serie A teams are struggling financially, Mudryk on loan would be an easy sell. Ligue 1 has really fallen so I wouldn't really call there a top choice, and he might actually struggle for playing time in Germany
@@spoots1234 champ is exactly what he needs, he needs to stay in england, not be pampered in another country where the football is completely different - yes theres a massive jump from champ to prem but a lot of the prem and england national teams top stars have come through the EFL
As much as I would love us to get Osimhen, he’s a mercenary, he just wants massive wages, if he really wanted to come to Chelsea he wouldn’t be making these ridiculous wage demands. We should just forget about him, don’t want players at the club like that
@@chif123 I was about to say the exact same thing. People move states in the US for a 12k salary bump. He's not asking for a wage increase he is asking for competitive salary like others at his level. If we don't want to pay it, leave him alone
A little off topic but it’s frustrating we got KDH for 30 and now Brighton getting Oreilly for same fee or similar. KDH looks lost somehow?? Oreilly looks like a baller.
Not gonna lie I feel like if we don’t get osimhen why don’t we try for viktor gyokeres…. Idk with out negotiation skills we might get a lower fee Or maybe Ivan tony…. Personally I don’t think we’re in a rush, with all these players we’re in a good stance to say “sure if u gonna prove hard to get then it’s fine” Idk maybe it’s just me🤷♂️
Gyokeres would cost more fee wise. Last rumoured price was €100m. Also for me better safe than sorry. For some players in a position of need we just need to pay. Felix should have been got for lesser, we shouldn't think too much about overpaying a bit if we're sure of a striker.
The only way I think it’s reasonable to get sancho is on loan for a year with option to buy. If he flops and doesn’t make any sense in terms of fitting in the squad, then send him back but if it works then great, we buy him. It’s just too risky to buy him permanently straight away
Don't particularly want Sancho, however he is 5 years younger than sterling on similar wages. IF he has a good season, would be easier to flip to another team down the road or keep🤷 and solves the Stirling problem. Equally getting rid of Chilwell wouldn't be a disaster.
Victor going to Saudi is like ending his career 😢😢😢 victo your brothers from Nigeria 🇳🇬 wishes to see you at Chelsea you can do great things with us 😊😊
@@Lukqru that is his business and his decision! If he goes to Saudi then those around him including his agents are giving him real bad advice and his career will be over. But I don't want him in Chelsea either except he wants to reduce his wages to fit our structure & come on loan with Option to buy after we access him & are sure he is not overrated & his injury woes are beyond him!
@@TT_2clean and glad you are not the sporting director either. Because our sporting director is making the right decision to take Osimhen on LOAN with OPTION ONLY to avoid such a RISKY signing like Osimhen!💙❤️❤️💪
The team do need another winger! Sterling is transfer listed, Neto has injury records and so his game time needs to be managed. And mudryk is not delivering to be given too much opportunities. Madueke cant play all games on the right and his backup is only Neto who also needs to play on the left. Chelsea is stacked on the number 8 but definitely not the wing. To people who say Palmer, Nkunku and Felix can play the wing needs to learn more about the game. They can doesn't mean they are good on the wing.
Anybody pissed off how the media for example Talksport coverage of Chelsea has been still negative, watched first 15 minutes of matterface and crook show and all they talked about was how even the 1st half was, how wolves were open in the midfield and literally nothing about how the attack was insane. They’re only saved video not stream on Chelsea was titled “I’m not happy with mudryk”. It’s all BS
2 players we should be signing are Viktor Gyokeres(if we sign Oshimen and already have Jackson obviously, then both will be at the african cup of nations leaving us strikerless) and Ademola Lookman because we need someone on the left wing. Squad complete
Sancho is predominantly right footed and occasionally plays on the left… hence why if it’s a Sterling-Sancho switch would make sense.. I’d even add a 10mill if Sancho lowers his wages.
Sancho refused Chelsea before and no Osimhen we don't need the headache we're fine without them, surely Maresca must now see how well his best players can do 💙💙💙
If anything we need another defensive midfielder...we should have kept big Les and sent Chukwuemka on loan instead...now Lavia is injured and probably Caicedo too...for every position player we have a replacement except at defensive mid enzo can replace lavia but who replaces caicedo?
My guy yan up on the grind early 💪 Don't think we need sancho. We have plenty of depth there . I think 1 top shelf striker is needed and maybe an experienced CB. Also, the 3rd kits been released and its just 💩, i wont be buying any of the kits this year they're horrific
imagine a attack where every player can play every attacking role; interchanging, floating around, providing different elements at any given moment. osimhen isnt that. sancho IS. tbf, we've only seen madueke play on the right side, but if you watch the england youth side that noni was a part of, he often played thru the middle. he's more of a swiss army knife than we think. so is sancho.
Not stacked!! Sterling is transfer listed, Neto has injury records and so his game time needs to be managed. And mudryk is not delivering to be given too much opportunities. Madueke cant play all games on the right and his backup is only Neto who also needs to play on the left. Chelsea is stacked on the number 8 but definitely not the wing.
It’s the same case as Felix, most people don’t feel like we need him but in the end I think we have to think about how many games we gonna play this season which probably more than 50 games some say almost 70 so we need depth to cover all the games so that we can win at least one of them.
@@Tony605 Sancho can play left wing which we only have neto & mudryk who so far hasn’t been good enough for maresca thus why he have been criticised by him. I know he can improve but maybe not at Chelsea. So if we loan him out we got room for another winger.
Dont need Sancho!! We will get estevao and paez next year! And what about Angelo? He is a forgotten player that seems to train for himself and needs a loan with the potentiel he has…seems like a weird signing
Are we like professional idiots or something? Sancho? REALLY? We need to straight sell people. Signing Sancho so United sign Sterling will likely still be a positive for us but we really don't have any use for Sancho. Mudryk, Neto, Noni makes 3 outright wingers. Felix, Nkunku and Palmer are 3 more that can and will play on the wing (Nkunku and Palmer having done so already). Also we still have Angelo and George around. Where exactly is Sancho supposed to get minutes from? He does it for Dortmund but he's the originator of the "007". I have no doubt that he'll be better for us that he's been for United but signing him would just be nonsense. If United want Sterling they should just sign him. If they need to offload Sancho first that's fine but we shouldn't take him. The only signings I'd accept from now are defensive signings. LB is sorted, RB too and Colwill looks great BUT Wes is still a bit shaky, I have no idea about how good Tosin is, Disasi seems clearly out of favor and Badiashile is a liability as soon as you ask him to defend. Sure that we can't take a look at Hummels (free) or Hermoso (also free)? Maybe bring back Tomori? How about Nathan Collins? How about Gasiorowski? I'd also personally love to take a chance on Sangante or Nagalo. They'd be cheap but really promising. No more forwards please.
@@nightops9526 I think it's the right move for now to play Colwill and Wes as they are only going to get better and have plenty of potential but I am really worried about what happens when one of them can't play. I don't trust Disasi in this system or Badiashile in general and Tosin is just a huge question mark for me. At least 1 new CB that we can get excited about would be really nice. Or get an academy kid more involved with the first team.
@@SirEEf13 I go with a world class CB with leadership qualities who can command the back line. But with dodgy Sanchez doesn’t help. Goal difference and clean sheets are vital.
@@nightops9526 yeah Sanchez will likely always be a question mark but so far he's not been dodgy. The defense in front of him had far more fault in all goals conceded so far.
Sancho is actually a great signing. We play better with natural wingers and I think Mudryk should leave on loan. If we get Sancho we will have Neto, Madueke, Sancho and George as our wing options. That’s good depth especially when Madueke and Neto have injury issues
Sancho doesn't only play on the right... he's actually better on left. In his last season at dortmund he enjoyed playing on the left. Btw this is not me saying I want sancho. I agree we're stacked on the wings. We don't need another winger
Osimhen agent came out in the last hour saying he has work to do in Europe so appears the Saudi move is off! Sancho is a big no, we dont need him. We also need to clear out Mudryk for a loan.
At this point I don't want Osimhen or Sancho. We're cooking with what we've already got. Maybe a LB or CB still needed, but other than that let's just do some outgoing stuff man
It wouldn't be nothing but insanity for us to give him the same wages. I'm sure Sancho understands that his wages have to be lowered if he were to join any club.
No to Sancho, he should go to Newcastle. Agree, Chilli to Man U. Sterling should consider Villa for CL football/appearances. Personally I'd offload Mudric as well
absolute hard no to sancho. We have too many wingers as is even without sterling.... UNLESSS..... Sterling went the other way, with the fees being the same/similar, His wages were reduced to the 120k level AND Mudryk went out on loan somewhere. Frees up some space, no extra outlay in fees, slashes the wage budget, and gives Mudryk game time to develop properly change to . I could live with it then. i dont see united going for that deal, and I dont see Sancho accepting the wage level. though. Oh AND we would have to be playing the 4231 formation to negate playing NKunku or Felix in the wider positions.
We have enough wingers, and better ones, Mudryk needs to improve but Noni, Palmer, Neto are all better and we still have Sterling sat there collecting a wage.
Absolutely do not break wage structure for Osimhen. No way. If he wants to come he accepts pay structure with big bonuses if he delivers and we win stuff He wants more than Salah Foden De Bryne and HAALAND ! He earns shed loads because he personally delivers and City win stuff
Sancho does well on left wing !! If we could loan Mudryk out for a couple seasons, I would take a Gamble on Sancho ! He has good Market Value , he's young and we could maybe send Sterling the other way ... It's all down to wages , He will have to take a big pay cut which is very unlikely
I can’t believe we are really interested in Sancho. Osihmen to oil money? Good luck but I don’t believe that for a minute either… just Napoli trying to apply pressure. Or Chelsea playing games via their Saudi links.
We don't need Sancho or Osimhen. Or any other attacker. We have plenty of quality already and bringing more players in is only going to upset players with their playing time and won't allow any of them to get in to a rhythm or form. With Estevao and Paez coming next year too, I don't see why the sporting directors are even considering bringing in more. Too much change is detrimental to a team's chemistry and mentality. Our squad is loaded, leave it.
Maybe Chelsea are getting Sancho cheap and planning on selling Noni? We also have Estevao and Paez who can play right wing arriving next summer. Hope we keep Noni and don't get Sancho.
Madueke should write travel reviews for all the cities he visits
😂😂😂😂😂
🤣🤣🤣🤣
😂
“There is NUFFIN good about this place” 😂
Madueke is right, all towns are sh*te!
If Osimen is tempted by the Saudi league then he does not have the right mindset to come to the premier league. Move on
Agree, if he is already putting astronomical wages before playing top flight football then we should move on, let him go to Saudi.
He signed a contract mid season last season with 100m release clause for higher wages. I'd say it's his own fault.
Football is a short career.
To say Osimeh is not fit for EPL becauses he demands market value salary is ridiculous tbh
@@musan9079 The market dictates what his salary is, if he wants £500k then he can leave Europe and play in the Saudi league. To most professionals thats something they do before retirement, most would see that as putting money before professional achievement and it’s why the likes of Mbappe and co rejected the opportunity to make such a move.
His choice though…
He's allowed to earn what he is already earning now. Would you switch jobs for less money?? Besides psg was willing to meet that but his owners were ass hats on the transfer fee
Tyrique George is the future. No need for Sancho.
Loan Mudryk to Strasbourg.
That last sentence is soooo fkn real 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Best take of the day
Facts
We need both. Much more so than we need Osimhen
agree with the first two, would like mudryk to stay around these boys and play in conference league to keep his confidence for a sustained period of time
I love Sancho as a player but we don’t need him. Already have enough options on the wing. Estevao Willian coming in next year too.
And Kaendry Paez
No Sancho please. We’re already stacked!😅
Exactly how I feel we got so many we don’t need to replace Sterling after he goes
No, Neto has injury records, Madueke can't play all games, Sterling is transfer listed, Mudryk is not delivering and there are two sides on the wing, right and left!! As long as Sancho is willing to reduce his wages to the current standard on the team it's good. Compared to striker position the team will need one more proper winger.
@@footballfan5048no he's useless and sulks if he's benched..
No club will sign Sterling.. Sancho just allows Chelsea to swap Sterling for Sancho hopefully to reduce the wage bill. And maybe a change of teams could favour both players
@@footballfan5048neto is not really injury prone more just unlucky. As far as i now its been only 1 muscle injury for like 11 games and not like reece james for example with his constant hamstring issues.
As a fellow African, I can confirm that Osimehn definitely puts the bag above everything else! 😂💯
Everyone puts the bag ahead of other things.
Don't care, he can be our Nigerian prince. We're lacking a centre forward.
@@hnaku8748we have king Jackson 😆😊😝
I don't blame him
That’s the problem with the politicians too
No Sancho no no no. 1 striker needed then we can concentrate on the footy. Just ridiculous that we've not bought a striker amongst all the players that came in.
Do we really need one tho? We scored 6 goals and could PLAY with a false nine or use those we have in Jackson and guiu…which both has a skillset we like in High work rate
Damn felix is our striker bro we don't need striker again
I somewhat agree but there have been none truly available any top striker for the past couple years have been committed to Barca, Madrid (I.e lewandowski and mbappe) we tried Samu and it didn’t work out, everyone says osimehn but he is clearly toxic for the team and why are we in a rush to put ourselves in another situation when we just got rid of lukaku after all these years. We need to take our time I agree we need a striker but in that role we’ve historically made bad decisions. Lastly, NO to sancho
@@petergtterup4205I know you’re feeling good after we scored 6 but teams will change the way they play against us sitting more into a low block not pressing us high like wolves did. So not having a target man option will be a problem. That doesn’t have to be osimhen but to not have that profile even as a plan b would be silly.
But we've got Guiu
Mudryk to Ipswich or Strasbourg on loan would be applaudable. heck, i would transfer him somewhere in the national league to build his confidence
Serie A would be perfect. He need to learn to slow down
@@spoots1234what serie A team is gonna want to/deserves to have to start him 😂😂 send him to the champ to humble himself and learn the english game and stay immersed in english culture
@@chull-lg7gv Mudryk has top class qualities, apart from skying the ball into the stands when he should score. The Championship is more physical and aggressive than the EPL. That's the last thing he needs. What he needs is time on the ball and experience scoring goals. That'll happen in Serie A, Ligue 1 or Bundesliga, but since most Serie A teams are struggling financially, Mudryk on loan would be an easy sell. Ligue 1 has really fallen so I wouldn't really call there a top choice, and he might actually struggle for playing time in Germany
@@spoots1234 you’ve got no clue lad, clearly never played the game yourself
@@spoots1234 champ is exactly what he needs, he needs to stay in england, not be pampered in another country where the football is completely different - yes theres a massive jump from champ to prem but a lot of the prem and england national teams top stars have come through the EFL
You’re up early Yan my man.
As much as I would love us to get Osimhen, he’s a mercenary, he just wants massive wages, if he really wanted to come to Chelsea he wouldn’t be making these ridiculous wage demands. We should just forget about him, don’t want players at the club like that
We seem to forget that football is their profession. Most us will not willingly take a wage cut, to join a company with pedigree
@@chif123 I was about to say the exact same thing. People move states in the US for a 12k salary bump. He's not asking for a wage increase he is asking for competitive salary like others at his level. If we don't want to pay it, leave him alone
I here osimen wants 5 hundred grand a week. No one should pay that he can sit on the bench and watch lukaku as far as I care
A little off topic but it’s frustrating we got KDH for 30 and now Brighton getting Oreilly for same fee or similar. KDH looks lost somehow?? Oreilly looks like a baller.
Never thought I’d see the day when Bournemouth has a better goalkeeper than man United and Chelsea how the mighty has fallen
Nukunku is hardly getting game time and they want sancho he'll na
Nkunku literally started against City and Servette
@@marvooo3933 bro if we bring sancho rotating the club will be a problem we dont need him his a waste of money
@@marvooo3933 we are already good in front even without oshimen they should focus on outgoings
@@marvooo3933people are so stupid buying what pundit says without actually checking if it's true or not. Nkunku definitely got a lot of playtime.
@@footballfan5048 he didn’t start against Wolves because we need to manage his minutes and overload, he will start on Thursday
Toney would still be a dam good option. I would love Watkins but that would never happen.
€65 million isn’t £55 million. It’s actually £54,994,436 and 32p. You are usually so accurate Yan. 😂
Not gonna lie I feel like if we don’t get osimhen why don’t we try for viktor gyokeres….
Idk with out negotiation skills we might get a lower fee
Or maybe Ivan tony….
Personally I don’t think we’re in a rush, with all these players we’re in a good stance to say “sure if u gonna prove hard to get then it’s fine”
Idk maybe it’s just me🤷♂️
Gyokeres would cost more fee wise. Last rumoured price was €100m.
Also for me better safe than sorry. For some players in a position of need we just need to pay. Felix should have been got for lesser, we shouldn't think too much about overpaying a bit if we're sure of a striker.
@@hnaku8748 Yh I know
But I was saying if we can express and interest nd get a lower fee….
But I get what u mean though
The only way I think it’s reasonable to get sancho is on loan for a year with option to buy. If he flops and doesn’t make any sense in terms of fitting in the squad, then send him back but if it works then great, we buy him. It’s just too risky to buy him permanently straight away
Don't particularly want Sancho, however he is 5 years younger than sterling on similar wages. IF he has a good season, would be easier to flip to another team down the road or keep🤷 and solves the Stirling problem. Equally getting rid of Chilwell wouldn't be a disaster.
If Osimhen is even contemplating Saudi we should forget him his only interest is cash.
Can we compare sancho and Sterling stats? I think a straight swap would be alright!
Victor going to Saudi is like ending his career 😢😢😢 victo your brothers from Nigeria 🇳🇬 wishes to see you at Chelsea you can do great things with us 😊😊
Fr his career would end there. If he goes to Saudi
Football Therapy, nice video bro
Big NO on Sancho coming to Chelsea. Also, NO on Osimhen too. Let Osimhen go to Saudi to get the bag.
I think Chelsea see Sancho as a profile signing that they can sell on for big money
I’m Nigerian 🇳🇬 I’m not a fan of Osimhen to Chelsea, but I am a fan of Osimhen as you would imagine.
Same here!!!
Glad u ain't a sporting director
Are you a fan of osimhen to Saudi??
@@Lukqru that is his business and his decision! If he goes to Saudi then those around him including his agents are giving him real bad advice and his career will be over. But I don't want him in Chelsea either except he wants to reduce his wages to fit our structure & come on loan with Option to buy after we access him & are sure he is not overrated & his injury woes are beyond him!
@@TT_2clean and glad you are not the sporting director either. Because our sporting director is making the right decision to take Osimhen on LOAN with OPTION ONLY to avoid such a RISKY signing like Osimhen!💙❤️❤️💪
Chilwell also big pals with Mount... It would be a good move for him, not sure if it's good for United though?
Is Osiman even as good as Lakaku, who has done more in the substandard Italian league. Osiman has one good season under his belt is too risky.
The team do need another winger! Sterling is transfer listed, Neto has injury records and so his game time needs to be managed. And mudryk is not delivering to be given too much opportunities. Madueke cant play all games on the right and his backup is only Neto who also needs to play on the left.
Chelsea is stacked on the number 8 but definitely not the wing.
To people who say Palmer, Nkunku and Felix can play the wing needs to learn more about the game. They can doesn't mean they are good on the wing.
Yeah 👍
Felix, Nkuku, palmer, dbh are natural 8. All four of them are top class.
Jadon Sancho prefers to play on the left.
Remember when he did well in Dortmund he played on the left.
There is something funny about the most expensive GK in the world playing for Bournemouth
Am i the only one whk thinks we can totally ditch Ohsimen and go for Ivan Toney ?
Or wait season and try get Watkins
Anybody pissed off how the media for example Talksport coverage of Chelsea has been still negative, watched first 15 minutes of matterface and crook show and all they talked about was how even the 1st half was, how wolves were open in the midfield and literally nothing about how the attack was insane. They’re only saved video not stream on Chelsea was titled “I’m not happy with mudryk”. It’s all BS
Please man keep this Intro song its absolutely 10 times better than the usual song
It's the same song
@@victorsakala8496 Haha i didnt know that. It must be a different verse of the song. Its much better
@@mustafabile897Issa remix actually
2 players we should be signing are Viktor Gyokeres(if we sign Oshimen and already have Jackson obviously, then both will be at the african cup of nations leaving us strikerless) and Ademola Lookman because we need someone on the left wing. Squad complete
My guy... I will understand if Osimhen goes to Saudi and its more than just about the money.
Why are we considering buying Sancho when the position he mainly plays is as a right winger? Esteavo is coming next season and he's also RW...
Reports Oshimen wants 400,000 a week is all I need to hear to say thanks but no thanks
Sancho is predominantly right footed and occasionally plays on the left… hence why if it’s a Sterling-Sancho switch would make sense.. I’d even add a 10mill if Sancho lowers his wages.
Sancho refused Chelsea before and no Osimhen we don't need the headache we're fine without them, surely Maresca must now see how well his best players can do 💙💙💙
That’s crazy, what are thinking about buying sancho, we have plenty of right wingers and there’s no way in hell we should even consider selling Noni
If anything we need another defensive midfielder...we should have kept big Les and sent Chukwuemka on loan instead...now Lavia is injured and probably Caicedo too...for every position player we have a replacement except at defensive mid enzo can replace lavia but who replaces caicedo?
My guy yan up on the grind early 💪
Don't think we need sancho. We have plenty of depth there . I think 1 top shelf striker is needed and maybe an experienced CB. Also, the 3rd kits been released and its just 💩, i wont be buying any of the kits this year they're horrific
Thanks!
imagine a attack where every player can play every attacking role; interchanging, floating around, providing different elements at any given moment. osimhen isnt that. sancho IS.
tbf, we've only seen madueke play on the right side, but if you watch the england youth side that noni was a part of, he often played thru the middle. he's more of a swiss army knife than we think. so is sancho.
Oh Lord no I don’t want Sancho. We are stacked at wingers/attacking midfielders. We only need to offload our players.
Not stacked!! Sterling is transfer listed, Neto has injury records and so his game time needs to be managed. And mudryk is not delivering to be given too much opportunities. Madueke cant play all games on the right and his backup is only Neto who also needs to play on the left.
Chelsea is stacked on the number 8 but definitely not the wing.
@@footballfan5048We have Estevao coming in next year. Where would he play?
It’s the same case as Felix, most people don’t feel like we need him but in the end I think we have to think about how many games we gonna play this season which probably more than 50 games some say almost 70 so we need depth to cover all the games so that we can win at least one of them.
Felix can play midfield, wing and 9.
@@Tony605 Sancho can play left wing which we only have neto & mudryk who so far hasn’t been good enough for maresca thus why he have been criticised by him. I know he can improve but maybe not at Chelsea. So if we loan him out we got room for another winger.
@@izzatasyraf314 well Felix can play wing as well.
@@izzatasyraf314 Felix can play wing as well.
I would add Sterling to the Victor deal.
Yan, why don’t you stream matches? (Watchalong)
i’d only pay 25 for sancho, 15 million in good, really good add ons
Yan is that you rapping in ur intros??
Sterling and Chilwell for Sancho is a….
STEAL
Dont need Sancho!! We will get estevao and paez next year! And what about Angelo? He is a forgotten player that seems to train for himself and needs a loan with the potentiel he has…seems like a weird signing
Are we like professional idiots or something? Sancho? REALLY?
We need to straight sell people. Signing Sancho so United sign Sterling will likely still be a positive for us but we really don't have any use for Sancho.
Mudryk, Neto, Noni makes 3 outright wingers. Felix, Nkunku and Palmer are 3 more that can and will play on the wing (Nkunku and Palmer having done so already). Also we still have Angelo and George around.
Where exactly is Sancho supposed to get minutes from? He does it for Dortmund but he's the originator of the "007".
I have no doubt that he'll be better for us that he's been for United but signing him would just be nonsense.
If United want Sterling they should just sign him. If they need to offload Sancho first that's fine but we shouldn't take him.
The only signings I'd accept from now are defensive signings.
LB is sorted, RB too and Colwill looks great BUT Wes is still a bit shaky, I have no idea about how good Tosin is, Disasi seems clearly out of favor and Badiashile is a liability as soon as you ask him to defend.
Sure that we can't take a look at Hummels (free) or Hermoso (also free)?
Maybe bring back Tomori? How about Nathan Collins? How about Gasiorowski?
I'd also personally love to take a chance on Sangante or Nagalo. They'd be cheap but really promising.
No more forwards please.
Agree! The shaky CB and defence needs urgent sorting out.
@@nightops9526 I think it's the right move for now to play Colwill and Wes as they are only going to get better and have plenty of potential but I am really worried about what happens when one of them can't play.
I don't trust Disasi in this system or Badiashile in general and Tosin is just a huge question mark for me.
At least 1 new CB that we can get excited about would be really nice. Or get an academy kid more involved with the first team.
@@SirEEf13 I go with a world class CB with leadership qualities who can command the back line. But with dodgy Sanchez doesn’t help. Goal difference and clean sheets are vital.
@@nightops9526 yeah Sanchez will likely always be a question mark but so far he's not been dodgy. The defense in front of him had far more fault in all goals conceded so far.
Sancho is actually a great signing. We play better with natural wingers and I think Mudryk should leave on loan. If we get Sancho we will have Neto, Madueke, Sancho and George as our wing options. That’s good depth especially when Madueke and Neto have injury issues
Hey Yang why haven’t you got a Chelsea mug lol
Sancho doesn't only play on the right... he's actually better on left. In his last season at dortmund he enjoyed playing on the left.
Btw this is not me saying I want sancho. I agree we're stacked on the wings. We don't need another winger
Osimhen agent came out in the last hour saying he has work to do in Europe so appears the Saudi move is off! Sancho is a big no, we dont need him. We also need to clear out Mudryk for a loan.
At this point I don't want Osimhen or Sancho. We're cooking with what we've already got. Maybe a LB or CB still needed, but other than that let's just do some outgoing stuff man
What was that in my headphones on the intro...🔥🔥🔥🔥
Sterling and Chilwell to Manchester united here we go
Andrey Santos who can play there scored for Strasbourg v Rennes
If Sancho's in then mudryk has to sit or go on loan.
why would they be in for osimhen for so long if they are not going to accept his salary, waste of time then.
Sancho's wages wouldnt make it possible for him to join chelsea so its impossible
It wouldn't be nothing but insanity for us to give him the same wages. I'm sure Sancho understands that his wages have to be lowered if he were to join any club.
I’m not saying I want sancho, but saying he ONLY plays on the right is false, he plays on both sides
No to Sancho, he should go to Newcastle. Agree, Chilli to Man U. Sterling should consider Villa for CL football/appearances. Personally I'd offload Mudric as well
The new 3rd kit is sexy
all these squad depth are preparation for UCL future i think. if it's not happening, ship the unnecessary players to Saudi 🤣🤣👍
absolute hard no to sancho. We have too many wingers as is even without sterling.... UNLESSS..... Sterling went the other way, with the fees being the same/similar, His wages were reduced to the 120k level AND Mudryk went out on loan somewhere. Frees up some space, no extra outlay in fees, slashes the wage budget, and gives Mudryk game time to develop properly change to . I could live with it then. i dont see united going for that deal, and I dont see Sancho accepting the wage level. though. Oh AND we would have to be playing the 4231 formation to negate playing NKunku or Felix in the wider positions.
Right now we just need to offload players asap. Waste of wage bill for a lot of players who won't get to play.
Yeah don’t want sancho, ig that if Sterling goes the other way then maybe but we don’t need more wingers
We have enough wingers, and better ones, Mudryk needs to improve but Noni, Palmer, Neto are all better and we still have Sterling sat there collecting a wage.
Wat we should do is loan mudryk to strassbourg or a championship team
Shame kepa wont be able to play against us. Would be hilarious 😅
No thanks!!! We already have too many attackers and Paez/Willian coming next year
Absolutely do not break wage structure for Osimhen. No way. If he wants to come he accepts pay structure with big bonuses if he delivers and we win stuff
He wants more than Salah Foden De Bryne and HAALAND ! He earns shed loads because he personally delivers and City win stuff
No sancho we are already fine with the current squad
I like the way you say; Kepa Arrizabalaga 😂
Loaning Kepa makes no sense, he's on high wages. better to get his wages off the books IMO.
Sancho does well on left wing !! If we could loan Mudryk out for a couple seasons, I would take a Gamble on Sancho ! He has good Market Value , he's young and we could maybe send Sterling the other way ...
It's all down to wages , He will have to take a big pay cut which is very unlikely
The more we learn about Osimen the worse it sounds. We don’t need anyone who is only chasing money, he’s just gonna cause problems
Yes Yan!!
Bringing in Sancho limits nkunku’s positioning and basically bins him as a 9
squad depth and quality is very important
@@marvooo3933so is player's morale
@@madziaciapkono player will sulk under Enzo, he has everyone under control
Madrid, Bayern, Barca, mancity first and second team are top class why can't Chelsea have that depth?!
Plus nkuku is better as a 9. He's finishing is top tier.
We don’t need sancho
Nope but ill take him over Sterling Mudryk… idk only if he can play from the left
We don't need no more attacking players for god sake.....
The fans should be able to vote to veto a deal. If so this Sancho crap goes away fast.
I can’t believe we are really interested in Sancho.
Osihmen to oil money? Good luck but I don’t believe that for a minute either… just Napoli trying to apply pressure. Or Chelsea playing games via their Saudi links.
The realist killa
A Top Striker and a Quality CD or Keep Trev
We don't need Sancho or Osimhen. Or any other attacker. We have plenty of quality already and bringing more players in is only going to upset players with their playing time and won't allow any of them to get in to a rhythm or form. With Estevao and Paez coming next year too, I don't see why the sporting directors are even considering bringing in more. Too much change is detrimental to a team's chemistry and mentality. Our squad is loaded, leave it.
We need team players, on the surface sancho doesnt fit. Theres no smoke without fire
Maybe Chelsea are getting Sancho cheap and planning on selling Noni? We also have Estevao and Paez who can play right wing arriving next summer. Hope we keep Noni and don't get Sancho.
The click bait will be mad this week, can’t wait for the window to close.
£500k a week…. That level of greed is crazy, I can only think it’s his agents that are making him take that stance.
This is wat greed gets u to Napoli,
If osiemen heads to saudi forget the release clause home will be forgotten in a year
Did we change the intro song???
Why would Sancho be needed? Where and when would he play? Also he would be a bench player and Man United would want starter money.
Time to trim the fat from the squad
Why has nobody mentioned the 35 million saved over 2 years on Lukaku wages - does this not support the Osimen buy and support