Definitely vector brush dude Although recently have been trying to implement some raster brushes in my work for shadow like you say but mainly vector brush is my go too .
Good video. What's your opinion of "vector" brushes that are actually only pixels that follow along a curve or line? I personally believe that if something is going to be called a vector, then it should be exactly that, a vector, with clean edges and has the ability to be converted into a full vector object if need be. If you can't convert/expand then it's not a vector.
That makes sense, I wonder whether it's called a "vector" purely because it doesn't use pixels in the "traditional" way. Either way if it works the way I want and can be helpful to the design process then I don't really mind
Which do you use the most?
Definitely vector brush dude
Although recently have been trying to implement some raster brushes in my work for shadow like you say but mainly vector brush is my go too .
Nicely explained thank you. It's pretty confusing trying to figure out the difference but I shall now remember voodoo for vector haha that's great!!
Excellent explanation! Voodoo...🤣 Love your blue moon. Thanks for the quick course!
Good video. What's your opinion of "vector" brushes that are actually only pixels that follow along a curve or line? I personally believe that if something is going to be called a vector, then it should be exactly that, a vector, with clean edges and has the ability to be converted into a full vector object if need be. If you can't convert/expand then it's not a vector.
That makes sense, I wonder whether it's called a "vector" purely because it doesn't use pixels in the "traditional" way. Either way if it works the way I want and can be helpful to the design process then I don't really mind