@@HeppeGaming yes but you have one that can run it then bedrock edition do has in-built RTX,emotes,can change camera angle to any custom value with simple commands,and all other things you should change to bedrock (I'm sounding like a vegan trying to get you off meat)
"Between 21 and 51, no way of knowing exactly how much" is one answer, not many. "Not enough information" is a correct answer, it's simply better when you add a range. But saying 21 and 51 are both correct answers is wrong. Your task is to find the number of cubes in the trailer, not a possible configuration of how many there could be. If I asked you how many guns I have in my pocket, and you can see 1 sticking out, you wouldn't answer "12 million", you would answer "at least one, no way to know for sure" In my opinion the correct answer is 35-51 because gravity is a thing
the optimum minimum cube amount you used doesn't make sense at all though, like if it was Minecraft physics you would be right, but since the problem didn't say "with Minecraft physics(lack of physics)" then we have to assume that those stacked cubes are stacked on top of other cubes
@@parcton9716 the question being asked is how many cubes there are, not just blocks, if it was blocks, it would be between 21 and 51, but cubes can also include 2X2X2's and 3X3X3's, which there are 2 3X3X3's and 16 2X2X2's which makes 69 at very most im thinking at it like one of those 'how many triangles are in this image' puzzles which the number is usually larger than just counting all individual triangles
@@HeppeGaming he says that no units were given so you can make the build 2x larger or 3x larger even. This is an argument that at first might seem correct, but the question asks how many cubes there are on the trailer. This means they give you the exact units - cubes. building a 2x2 cube and considering it one cube while also counting it as 4 cubes is just mathematically incorrect and physically stupid.
If it was relevant, extra information would be given
Yea, the problem is definitely not what the author intended, which doesn't stop me from giving a full answer
It is relevant if the problem can't be solved without that information
I love your chaotic way of building this, it looks like someone that got their teeth knocked out, I used rectangles
It may look chaotic, but it's definitely optimal.
the old old versions of minecraft with no ambient occlusions would showcase this perfectly
Blender would show this perfectly
@@HeppeGaming not as fun as minecraft though lol
@@HeppeGamingbut minecraft makes my dopamine go weee(i have an very strong adhd, dopamine is scarce)
in heppe we trust
in me we trust
In Heppe we trust
This man uses minecraft instead of matlab
I'm built different
WE NEED MORE REALISM! TURN THAT RTX ON RIGHT NOW!
I DONT HAVE ONE
Then play bedrock edition it has built in RTX @@HeppeGaming
I don't think a graphics card will spawn inside my computer once I install bedrock
@@HeppeGaming yes but you have one that can run it then bedrock edition do has in-built RTX,emotes,can change camera angle to any custom value with simple commands,and all other things you should change to bedrock (I'm sounding like a vegan trying to get you off meat)
"Between 21 and 51, no way of knowing exactly how much" is one answer, not many. "Not enough information" is a correct answer, it's simply better when you add a range. But saying 21 and 51 are both correct answers is wrong. Your task is to find the number of cubes in the trailer, not a possible configuration of how many there could be.
If I asked you how many guns I have in my pocket, and you can see 1 sticking out, you wouldn't answer "12 million", you would answer "at least one, no way to know for sure"
In my opinion the correct answer is 35-51 because gravity is a thing
ok
the optimum minimum cube amount you used doesn't make sense at all though, like if it was Minecraft physics you would be right, but since the problem didn't say "with Minecraft physics(lack of physics)" then we have to assume that those stacked cubes are stacked on top of other cubes
45
I think... maybe idk I'm just going off of the thumbnail :)
Uhhhh, I guess? The answer is [21, 51] so technically, 45 is in the range
@@HeppeGaming Keep in mind I am stupid
it's between 21 and 69 if the question is cubes and not blocks:)
what dis mean
@@parcton9716 the question being asked is how many cubes there are, not just blocks, if it was blocks, it would be between 21 and 51, but cubes can also include 2X2X2's and 3X3X3's, which there are 2 3X3X3's and 16 2X2X2's which makes 69 at very most
im thinking at it like one of those 'how many triangles are in this image' puzzles which the number is usually larger than just counting all individual triangles
I think all of us are overthinking the problem. But still... NICE
@@daviscalledfredAhhh ok! I understand now
@@parcton9716 yeah I see these puzzles and look quite abstractly at them, so I do understand the confusion lmao
well a 2*2*2 and 3*3*3 structure is also a cube so more than 51
wat
@@HeppeGaming he says that no units were given so you can make the build 2x larger or 3x larger even. This is an argument that at first might seem correct, but the question asks how many cubes there are on the trailer. This means they give you the exact units - cubes. building a 2x2 cube and considering it one cube while also counting it as 4 cubes is just mathematically incorrect and physically stupid.
I didn't think it needed to be specified, but 1 cube = 1 in game block
@HeppeGaming you don't need to specify it since you're counting cubes and not in game blocks, the ratio between them does not change the end result
blocks on side = 17 17 *3 = 51
Did you even watch the video?
You forgot Gravity !
I dont believe in gravity
@@HeppeGaming Start believing it until it costs you to make it believe. :-D
3х3х7-(3+3+3+3)=51
Yea, but that's not the only correct answer
53 I guess
It's not exactly in the range of [21, 51] but it is close
51
That is one of the options
50
Sure, that's within range
@@HeppeGaming 50
@@bjincastano8438 Sure, that's within range