spoiler alert, its the star with a black hole core, theoretically thought to exist at near the beginning of the universe and are the reason supermassive black holes exist
Theirs a good chance that they existed in the Universe far in its infancy, and were very common... Some speculate that their deaths is how galaxies form, as every galactic center contains a black hole that was also once thought impossible to exist.
Speculation here: the galaxy center is the remnants of a second-generation hypermassive star that had a black hole core I say second-generation because while they were the first semi-stable ones, they were not the first ones.
Black hole stars don't necessarily have to collapse or go supernova, cuz if they can form, then they can obviously maintain some kind of balance, at least temporarily
5:46 this means that the compressed space inside a black hole, minus the gravitational warp of space time curvature, would be far bigger than the universe
As an official religion hater, I think they make a bunch of shit up to justify the huge money that get invested into NASA. We don't know anything outside of our solar system, besides a bunch of speculation. IMO, i'm no expert in science.
There isn't a black hole within our star, this video revolves around the hypothetical celestial body "Quasi Star" or better known as a black hole star.
@@Vxrtu did you saw the whole video? at the end it mentions the possibility of a star being formed around of a tiny black hole and a star like that being colder then usual
The univserve is such a mystery that it honestly angers me that we don't know anything besides the basics. Dont get me wrong we came a long way but even I feel like even if we were the most advanced type of civilization we still wouldn't know shit about the universe.
I'm not an astrophysicist, nor was my 8th grade physical science teacher, but I think he was right about star formation. Gravity is too weak to do it. Electromagnetism HAS to play a key part in the earliest stages.
i googled (x^3)=1000. cos if 1000 jupiters fits in a sun, and they're both roughly spherical, then jupiters height compared to the sun should = 1/X . X is 10, so jupiter should be roughly 1/10th the height of the sun, if 1000 jupiters fit in it.
I'm probably very wrong with this, but I could imagine that every galaxy was originally a black hole proto-star of incomprehensible size that then shed its outer layers, but due to the rotation of the black hole in the center, the released matter formed an accretion-disk-like structure within the gravitational range of the black hole. It just feels plausible to me.
my guess before watching is that it is a supermassive blackhole whose accretion disc built up so much material that its accretion disc began to undergo nuclear fusion and was both prevented from being blasted away from the black whole by its gravity while its only energy from the nuclear fusion prevents the disc from entering the black hole
he clicked baited us to drop a one liner near the end that "our universe likely doesn't have one anymore" so how did they find one? they didn't sounds like its just theorized.
yeah... i saw a few errors in this video... i lost interest half way through. The video says UY scuti's mass is 7-10 solar mass when its actually around 9 million solar mass. Also later it showed a podium of a black hole, a neutron star and a white dwarf and it showed pulsar for dwarf star.
@@alex-tx7qi its a theory, I stopped watching this video halfway bc i lost interest but the theory is that in the early universe after the big bang when the universe was much more dense, stars form but they keep growing with material falling into it meanwhile the black hole at the center keeps eating like buffet. They say it's probably how supermassive black holes came to be.
Unbelievable discovery, NASA! The cosmos never ceases to amaze. Imagine what else is out there waiting to be revealed! I am an explorer myself and I love such stuff
What am I missing? We’ve known about Quasars for years now, you know, those giant balls of light at the center of the galaxy. Last I heard, it was a massive black hole that caused this.
Your black hole reference would have been better if you used a grinding Stone grinding metal pieces of metal are burnt up and you know break down.While other pieces are chunk and tiny little fragments and tossed away
Wait... My guess of the big bang could be that 2 black hole stars collided and made the big bang that made a blackhole and since the parrerel dimension theory is here, the black hole was shooting out stars and galaxies because that theory. Theory 2 A black hole star(Also known as Quasi Stars) imploded and exploded tons of matter and quickly made galaxies and stars.
Type 1 Now we are talking. We can’t find out how long it would take us to reach that level because human development is kinda random. Maybe another cold war could make it a million times faster. Seriously. A scientist during the cold war, could go to the American government and say one word “Russia” and the government would reply with two words, “How much?” This was the era when we saw amazing development in an amazingly short period. The current American monopoly doesn’t make it seem important to the government to fund those scientists more. Ok, coming back to type one, when we become the planetary civilization. Now our main fuel source is NUCLEAR FUEL. But you would argue, isn’t that a thing today? Well, yes it is, but it is 1, dangerous to operate so not used in bulk, and 2, we use nuclear fission for our energy. The type one civilization will be based on nuclear fusion. Fusion releases a lot more energy and can be performed with simple elements like hydrogen, compared to fission, which needs rare metals like uranium or plutonium. We would have propulsor technology which would allow us to launch rockets into space without using that absurd amount of fuel, and make interplanetary travel easy. Type 2 Now we are a stellar civilization. The main source of our energy is nearby stars. We are now so developed that energy from nuclear fusion is not enough to fulfill our development needs. So, we take the next leap, Energy From Nearby Stars. No, I don’t mean we would plant solar panels in the oceans, we would plant them on the star…yup. Freeman Dyson, a theoretical physicist originated the concept of a Dyson sphere. We would build a system of rings around a nearby star and obtain all its energy, for our use. A very interesting event happened with a star names Tabby’s Star. Its intensity suddenly dropped by 22 percent! Scientists suspect the only way this is possible, as far we know is if someone built a Dyson sphere around it, someone who is already a type two civilization. Here is the quote from the wiki, Type 3 Introducing the Galactic Civilization, and the final level according to the original scale. Our energy source would still be Dyson’s sphere, however, this time we will build them all over the galaxy to fund our experiments. We would be able to access wormholes and zap through space. It is a theoretical object if you don’t know what that is. Imagine the universe as a piece of paper. You are on a point on a paper and want to go to some other point. Instead of traveling, you fold the paper in such a way that the point you are on and the point you want to go in touch with each other. Then you make a hole in your location and enter the place you want to go to. This is roughly how wormholes would function. A type 3 would not be able to build wormholes but can zap through preexisting ones. Type 4 Now we are a universal civilization. Our main energy source is supernovas! That is when a star explodes, releasing an absurd amount of energy. We would be traveling through multiple galaxies and extracting energy from supernovas. At this stage, humans would become immortal, like seriously! We would be able to upload our consciousness, the feeling of existing, along with our memory and experiences into a computer, and live in the metaverse or download that consciousness to another body, like the body of Ultron, and switch avatars and stuff. Being free from our biological bodies would open up new horizons for this civilization. We would also be capable of creating type 0 civilizations. They are kinda god-like, but not quite there yet. Type 5 Being a type 5, humans realize something amazing, they find that multiverses exist. This might sound like science fiction, but remember going to space was also fiction in the early 1900s, having self-driving cars was fiction in the late 1900s. So now we are MULTIVERAL CIVILIZATIONS. An unimaginable amount of energy would be required to go multiversal. A type 5 civilization will probably be looking for White Holes at a time. They are only theoretical but their existence can be proved using Einstein’s Field Equations. It has been estimated that a white hole can emit energy equivalent to 14 million times that of an average galaxy! Now humans might assume they are at the peak of civilization, but soon they will realize the greater truth. Type 6 We have always lived in a 3D world. Our brains are not capable of imagining things in the 4th dimension. But a type 6 can make their brains for their conscious selves. Their bodies are nothing but pure consciousness, and even going up by one dimension we would become a hundred times more efficient. Type 7 But now, humans think they have reached the peak of their civilization. There is no greater truth that they do not know. It is now time that Humans realize the existence of a type 7 civilization, the one we all worship, yes I am talking of the existence of Gods, the real type 7 beings…would be pretty cool right? Many scientists consider we would never really reach the status of a Type 7 civilization. A type7 can manipulate the laws of physics it can make matter from the vacuum, and generate a tremendous amount of energy with its Godly Power. That’s why type 7 has been rightfully called The Creator Civilization, which can build its universes, with any laws of physics, and play with the laws of physics and manipulate them the way it pleases. Millions of type 6 civilizations together cannot compare to the immense power of type 7. Feels sad no one will be able to develop to a type 7 or will we?
I think it would be a good idea, when comparing sizes of planets and stars, to remind watchers that the VOLUME is compared, not the diameter, so a 10x diameter equals a 1000x volume. Also, when comparing star sizes, I think it would be good to compare not only size but also density. A red giant might be a million times the volume of the sun but also a MILLION TIMES MORE TENUOUS, so the masses might be the same. And that said, I'm wondering about the volume ratios and mass ratios of black hole stars vs red giant stars.
13:37 gravity drew vast pockets of gas 13:41 into dense centers 13:45 they grew hotter and hotter igniting to 13:48 become the first generation of stars Sounds so good doesn't it? The problem is that it does not work. The Big bang is said to have produced hydrogen, and helium along with trace amounts of lithium and beryllium. The gas is said to have collapsed under gravity to form the first stars, today there are three methods of star formation. 1: compression, the shockwave of a supernova near a gas cloud compresses the gas enough for gravity to take over. 2: cooling, grains of dust enter the cloud cooling it enough to compress and gravity to take over. 3: collisions, such as two galaxies colliding and new stars forming along the collision front. Those are the three ways stars are formed today, the problem is that it takes stars to make new ones, 1: a supernova is a star exploding rather violently, the crab nebula is the remnant of a supernova. 2: cooling, the big bang did not make any grains of dust as those are made in stars. 3: Galaxy collisions, galaxies are just huge collections of stars. For all three things needed to make new stars, you need stars to exist to make new ones. go back to the big bang and there was no first generation of stars to make the second generation. "We Know the cloud wants to Collapse under its own weight to make one or more stars. but rotation as well as turbulent motion within the cloud work against that fate, so too does the ordinary gas pressure you learned about in High-school chemistry class." "Galactic magnetic fields also fight collapse they penetrate the cloud and latch onto any free-roaming charged particles contained therein restricting the ways in which the cloud will respond to its self-gravity" Tyson. Neil DeGrasse. 2007. Death by black hole and other cosmic quandaries. New York: w.w. Norton and co., P. 107 “The process by which an interstellar cloud is concentrated until it is held together gravitationally to become a protostar is not known.” Eva Novotny. Introduction to Stellar Atmospheres and Interiors, p. 279. “Literally hundreds of ideas on how stars are formed have been advanced in past decades. However, we are still far from any real solution.” Martin Harwit, Astronomical Concepts, Second Edition. p.405. “The origin of stars represents one of the most fundamental unsolved problems of contemporary astrophysics.” Charles J. Lada and Frank H. Shu. “The Formation of Sunllke Stars." Science, 4 May 1990, p. 564. “The formation of stars is one of the most fundamental problems in astrophysics... No current model can reproduce all of the observations.” Ward-Thompson, D., Isolated Star Formation: From Cloud Formation to Core Collapse, Science 4 January 2002: " Vol. 295. no. 5552, pp. 76 - 81. “The formation of galaxies and large-scale structure remains TMIUPIMA. . . "the most important unsolved problem in modern astrophysics.” V. Trimble and M. Aschwanden, Astrophysics in 2000, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 113:1025-1114,, 2001 September. They know self-gravity does not work to collapse a gas cloud into a star, but they do not have anything else so they just keep pushing the self-gravity model anyway. It is the same with our moon, 3 theories were advanced and Apollo was supposed to tell us which one was correct, but Apollo disproved all 3, so they needed a new theory. Enter the giant impactor theory where and object the size of mars came in at just the right angle and just the right speed hitting the earth where all the heavier stuff sunk down into the earth and the lighter stuff formed the moon, there is a hiccup with that as well. Moonwalker and geologist Harrison Schmitt discovered some of them back in 1972, during the Apollo 17 mission, when he looked down and was shocked to discover orange soil at his feet. A study about 10 years ago looked at the beads and saw hints of water. But the results also fell within the instrument's margin of error. So Hauri and his colleagues decided to look again using newer, more sensitive detection technology. Some moon experts were skeptical, saying there was no way the team would find any water molecules. "We got a lot of comments like, 'Oh, well, we already know that the moon is dry, we've known this for 20 years,'" Hauri says. But this time they did find water molecules, according to a report in the journal Nature. It wasn't a lot of water. The beads had only up to 46 parts per million. But from this, the researchers estimate that the interior of the moon once probably contained an amount of water equal to that of the Caribbean Sea. This is a problem for the giant impact theory, says Hauri. "It's hard to imagine a scenario in which a giant impact melts, completely, the moon, and at the same time allows it to hold onto its water," he says. "That's a really, really difficult knot to untie." The giant impact theory was all they had, and since finding that the moon once had a lot of water when it could not have had any after being completely molten disproves that theory, but guess what? they are still teaching this theory too, why? because they do not have another theory to replace it. That is modern science for you, they know things do not work but because they do not have anything else to replace them, they just keep teaching stuff they know does not work, is that true science or an agenda?
I hear all the time that stars become black holes, that black holes are in the middle of every universe, and that black holes only feed and get bigger. Is it possible that a black hole has another stage of metamorphosis that we have yet to see? It just seems like we everything would have , or is destined to be, drawn into a giant singularity at some point if everything is about gravity.
There is another possibility if a quasistar comes close to our solar system, other than complete destruction. If it doesn't barrel straight in to the center, it could instead divert all the planets and the Sun to orbit it instead. If the Earth is at a proper distance it might even settle into a new habitable zone.
Neutron star? you dont know? imma tell Stars way larger (about 30x larger) than the sun can form into a black hole or neutron star. If the gravity wins, it turns into a black hole. but if the mass wins, it turns into a neutron star. But stars that are not that big will turn into a red giant for some time, then after that they will turn into a white dwarf.
Yea I don’t think they were asking what a neutron star was. They were asking what a “newtron star” was considering that’s how the video had it spelled out. They were just pointing out the obvious mistakes made in the video. Honestly I almost posted the same thing. When I noticed the errors I checked the comments to see if people were talking about the obvious mistakes but all I found was mostly comments about Sound Garden and their song “Black Hole Sun” until I finally found this comment!
But how would they grow if they had a black hole in them? Shouldn't they have either collapsed on their selves or been swallowed by the black hole inside them?
If a baby black hole enters a big enough nebula with only hydrogen atoms and dark matter and energy and no heavier elements, it could form a Quasi Star
So the only reason a sun forms into a black hole when all its mass is ejected is because there's one inside the star already forming? That's an interesting hypothesis.
@@Captain.AmericaV1 well when people sit on the Toilet they can imagine anything specially when they are pushing, I know for a fact that what is in this video stinks like the shit that went down the toilet when this was thought.
@@Captain.AmericaV1 I don't need to proved anything since you are not even a scientist, you may be delusional and want attention, you should go to a hospital and get your brain checked.
Just goes to show we know nothing about space , We are trying to figure things out on a human basis, When the universe is so much more we can’t comprehend.
If Nibiru exists and is a red Giant and not a brown warf then perhaps the destroyer of world's hypnosis, wormwood, complete with black center, complements Hawkins theory.
Also, you said our sun would go red giant in about 5 billion years, then said it was 6 billion later in the video. The sun's remaining life is about the same age as the earth; 4½ billion years. Otherwise, fun vid
![The Insane Science of Neutron Stars [4K]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/qX6h72IyKSo/mqdefault.jpg)
![The Insane Science of Neutron Stars [4K]](/img/tr.png)
Wow. Chris Cornell was right
Came to comments for this!
Heaven send hell away no one sings like you anymore...
Lol
he invented none stick pan he should stay with that the rest he will never know..
@@victorforzani3433 you evangelicals know nothing.
So you're telling me its a... Black Hole Sun?
Good song!
XD
Only if it has planet(oid)s
I watched Sound Garden Live at the concert arena near UC Berkeley during their Spoon Man and Black Hole Sun days.
@@ernestmac13 cool
DONT YOU COME???
Was waiting for the part about how NASA found an ancient star that was previously thought impossible to exist.
spoiler alert, its the star with a black hole core, theoretically thought to exist at near the beginning of the universe and are the reason supermassive black holes exist
Right, but did NASA find one?
Theirs a good chance that they existed in the Universe far in its infancy, and were very common...
Some speculate that their deaths is how galaxies form, as every galactic center contains a black hole that was also once thought impossible to exist.
Speculation here: the galaxy center is the remnants of a second-generation hypermassive star that had a black hole core
I say second-generation because while they were the first semi-stable ones, they were not the first ones.
this is a shitpost channel, which every "destiny" channel I've seen ends up being. Hell, even Stargate Destiny was just a big shitpost.
Black hole sun, won’t you come, wash away the raaaaiiinn. Black hole sun, won’t you come, won’t you come? 😊
Black Hole Sun Black Hole Sun
Black hole Suuuuuuuuuun
SoundGarden approved!
RIP Chris.
Black hole stars don't necessarily have to collapse or go supernova, cuz if they can form, then they can obviously maintain some kind of balance, at least temporarily
"temporary" what happens when that balance faults? smh
That is true
Not only that but black hole stars do end up collapsing into massive black holes.
Before I looked at the title i thought that it was a donut 😂😂
same 😂
Me too
I wanted donut.
eat black hole star donut
Donuts 🍩
5:46 this means that the compressed space inside a black hole, minus the gravitational warp of space time curvature, would be far bigger than the universe
I would like to know how they saw a black hole inside that sun, but they can't see in our sun?
As an official religion hater, I think they make a bunch of shit up to justify the huge money that get invested into NASA. We don't know anything outside of our solar system, besides a bunch of speculation. IMO, i'm no expert in science.
Gravitational lensing. There's probably a math equation that says x amount of lensing means y amount of mass equals abra cadbra.
There isn't a black hole within our star, this video revolves around the hypothetical celestial body "Quasi Star" or better known as a black hole star.
@@Vxrtu did you saw the whole video? at the end it mentions the possibility of a star being formed around of a tiny black hole and a star like that being colder then usual
@@majinnemesis look at the original comment, but from further speculation the commenter might've meant star, not sun, so my bad on that part.
The univserve is such a mystery that it honestly angers me that we don't know anything besides the basics. Dont get me wrong we came a long way but even I feel like even if we were the most advanced type of civilization we still wouldn't know shit about the universe.
you forget about Stephenson 2-18 Hypergiant Star
He is saying UY scuti is the biggest star in milky way.
Finally!! New space update. Ive been waiting for so long!
If a body with that gravitational mass moved into the solar system. We would all be dead.
Wow black holes in the middle of stars
. .very interesting 👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾💯💯💯
for starter he have not seen such a thing he just make it up for attention and a new BS paper..
Great another impending doom syndrome fear trigger added to my list lol
I'm not an astrophysicist, nor was my 8th grade physical science teacher, but I think he was right about star formation. Gravity is too weak to do it. Electromagnetism HAS to play a key part in the earliest stages.
And after all of that caseOh is still bigger
This is mind-blowing when you also consider the expansion of the universe during the epoch of these Stars
If a black hole star gets within detection of heading into our solar system, I think we're all running.
WOW! That was an amazing theory!👏 There are some other ancient stars that are way larger than the largest black hole in the universe.✨️
Your wrong no star can be bigger than a light year
@@creatsotom6312He is not saying light year he is saying the largest black hole
@@warakpawairakpam270uhm...what
i googled (x^3)=1000. cos if 1000 jupiters fits in a sun, and they're both roughly spherical, then jupiters height compared to the sun should = 1/X . X is 10, so jupiter should be roughly 1/10th the height of the sun, if 1000 jupiters fit in it.
you should probably google the formula for the volume of a shpere
Bro this is all psudo science you should really apply yourself to something real that actually matters
Smart arse 😎
Smart 😳
I'm probably very wrong with this, but I could imagine that every galaxy was originally a black hole proto-star of incomprehensible size that then shed its outer layers, but due to the rotation of the black hole in the center, the released matter formed an accretion-disk-like structure within the gravitational range of the black hole. It just feels plausible to me.
I forgot how much I like you guys could and also black hole stars are freaking awesome
0:48 now i see where Soundgarden got their song from. 🤣
So... soundgarden was onto something
my guess before watching is that it is a supermassive blackhole whose accretion disc built up so much material that its accretion disc began to undergo nuclear fusion and was both prevented from being blasted away from the black whole by its gravity while its only energy from the nuclear fusion prevents the disc from entering the black hole
All hail the giant purple donut
Isn’t Stephenson 2-18 the largest known star?
Yeah .... I'm confused too after watching this video
he clicked baited us to drop a one liner near the end that "our universe likely doesn't have one anymore" so how did they find one? they didn't sounds like its just theorized.
yeah... i saw a few errors in this video... i lost interest half way through. The video says UY scuti's mass is 7-10 solar mass when its actually around 9 million solar mass. Also later it showed a podium of a black hole, a neutron star and a white dwarf and it showed pulsar for dwarf star.
@@alex-tx7qi its a theory, I stopped watching this video halfway bc i lost interest but the theory is that in the early universe after the big bang when the universe was much more dense, stars form but they keep growing with material falling into it meanwhile the black hole at the center keeps eating like buffet. They say it's probably how supermassive black holes came to be.
Actually, it's Phoenix A*
Phoneix A is larger than almost every nebula.
Unbelievable discovery, NASA! The cosmos never ceases to amaze. Imagine what else is out there waiting to be revealed! I am an explorer myself and I love such stuff
What am I missing? We’ve known about Quasars for years now, you know, those giant balls of light at the center of the galaxy. Last I heard, it was a massive black hole that caused this.
2:30. Neutron star: *Lightsaber noises.*
UY Scuti is not the biggest star I thought Stephenson 2-18 was.
I know you know, but they only grow if they eat. Otherwise, they constantly lose mass from hawking radiation
they'll radiate inversely to their mass, one the mass of the Sun would take ~10^30 years to evaporate, the one amid our our galaxy would take ~10^60.
Your black hole reference would have been better if you used a grinding Stone grinding metal pieces of metal are burnt up and you know break down.While other pieces are chunk and tiny little fragments and tossed away
It actually called.
A supernova
Tell me you don't understand how stars work without telling me you don't understand how stars work.
Tell me you've never heard of a Quasi Star without telling me you've never heard of a Quasi-star
interesting video, but I'm voting thumbs down because of the misleading title, since these stars haven't been found yet and are just theoretical
The video actually names the discovered quasi star and gives us it's size
Just watched the full video and it never said a name, mass, or size
@@silaskuira9124 it does not, doesn't reference any discovery
@@jucardi1 Oh you're right, I just realized we were catfished.
@@Omacron2104 Oh you're right, I just realized we were catfished.
We are going to eventually go to war with the void
Wait... My guess of the big bang could be that 2 black hole stars collided and made the big bang that made a blackhole and since the parrerel dimension theory is here, the black hole was shooting out stars and galaxies because that theory.
Theory 2
A black hole star(Also known as Quasi Stars) imploded and exploded tons of matter and quickly made galaxies and stars.
Type 1
Now we are talking. We can’t find out how long it would take us to reach that level because human development is kinda random. Maybe another cold war could make it a million times faster. Seriously. A scientist during the cold war, could go to the American government and say one word “Russia” and the government would reply with two words, “How much?” This was the era when we saw amazing development in an amazingly short period. The current American monopoly doesn’t make it seem important to the government to fund those scientists more.
Ok, coming back to type one, when we become the planetary civilization. Now our main fuel source is NUCLEAR FUEL. But you would argue, isn’t that a thing today? Well, yes it is, but it is 1, dangerous to operate so not used in bulk, and 2, we use nuclear fission for our energy. The type one civilization will be based on nuclear fusion. Fusion releases a lot more energy and can be performed with simple elements like hydrogen, compared to fission, which needs rare metals like uranium or plutonium. We would have propulsor technology which would allow us to launch rockets into space without using that absurd amount of fuel, and make interplanetary travel easy.
Type 2
Now we are a stellar civilization. The main source of our energy is nearby stars. We are now so developed that energy from nuclear fusion is not enough to fulfill our development needs. So, we take the next leap, Energy From Nearby Stars. No, I don’t mean we would plant solar panels in the oceans, we would plant them on the star…yup. Freeman Dyson, a theoretical physicist originated the concept of a Dyson sphere. We would build a system of rings around a nearby star and obtain all its energy, for our use.
A very interesting event happened with a star names Tabby’s Star. Its intensity suddenly dropped by 22 percent! Scientists suspect the only way this is possible, as far we know is if someone built a Dyson sphere around it, someone who is already a type two civilization. Here is the quote from the wiki,
Type 3
Introducing the Galactic Civilization, and the final level according to the original scale. Our energy source would still be Dyson’s sphere, however, this time we will build them all over the galaxy to fund our experiments. We would be able to access wormholes and zap through space. It is a theoretical object if you don’t know what that is. Imagine the universe as a piece of paper. You are on a point on a paper and want to go to some other point. Instead of traveling, you fold the paper in such a way that the point you are on and the point you want to go in touch with each other. Then you make a hole in your location and enter the place you want to go to. This is roughly how wormholes would function. A type 3 would not be able to build wormholes but can zap through preexisting ones.
Type 4
Now we are a universal civilization. Our main energy source is supernovas! That is when a star explodes, releasing an absurd amount of energy. We would be traveling through multiple galaxies and extracting energy from supernovas. At this stage, humans would become immortal, like seriously! We would be able to upload our consciousness, the feeling of existing, along with our memory and experiences into a computer, and live in the metaverse or download that consciousness to another body, like the body of Ultron, and switch avatars and stuff. Being free from our biological bodies would open up new horizons for this civilization. We would also be capable of creating type 0 civilizations. They are kinda god-like, but not quite there yet.
Type 5
Being a type 5, humans realize something amazing, they find that multiverses exist. This might sound like science fiction, but remember going to space was also fiction in the early 1900s, having self-driving cars was fiction in the late 1900s. So now we are MULTIVERAL CIVILIZATIONS. An unimaginable amount of energy would be required to go multiversal. A type 5 civilization will probably be looking for White Holes at a time. They are only theoretical but their existence can be proved using Einstein’s Field Equations. It has been estimated that a white hole can emit energy equivalent to 14 million times that of an average galaxy! Now humans might assume they are at the peak of civilization, but soon they will realize the greater truth.
Type 6
We have always lived in a 3D world. Our brains are not capable of imagining things in the 4th dimension. But a type 6 can make their brains for their conscious selves. Their bodies are nothing but pure consciousness, and even going up by one dimension we would become a hundred times more efficient.
Type 7
But now, humans think they have reached the peak of their civilization. There is no greater truth that they do not know. It is now time that Humans realize the existence of a type 7 civilization, the one we all worship, yes I am talking of the existence of Gods, the real type 7 beings…would be pretty cool right?
Many scientists consider we would never really reach the status of a Type 7 civilization. A type7 can manipulate the laws of physics it can make matter from the vacuum, and generate a tremendous amount of energy with its Godly Power. That’s why type 7 has been rightfully called The Creator Civilization, which can build its universes, with any laws of physics, and play with the laws of physics and manipulate them the way it pleases. Millions of type 6 civilizations together cannot compare to the immense power of type 7. Feels sad no one will be able to develop to a type 7 or will we?
I think it would be a good idea, when comparing sizes of planets and stars, to remind watchers that the VOLUME is compared, not the diameter, so a 10x diameter equals a 1000x volume.
Also, when comparing star sizes, I think it would be good to compare not only size but also density. A red giant might be a million times the volume of the sun but also a MILLION TIMES MORE TENUOUS, so the masses might be the same.
And that said, I'm wondering about the volume ratios and mass ratios of black hole stars vs red giant stars.
The music in the 1st 50secs❤
WAIT THE BLACKHOLE STARS ARE BACK?!?
Space scares the shit out of me
They’re referred to as Hawking stars and as of December 18, 2023 none have ever been found.
What a exceptionally gifted scientist ! He invented a new celestial object - "The Newtron - Star" ... may happen when you write as you speek !
13:37 gravity drew vast pockets of gas
13:41 into dense centers
13:45 they grew hotter and hotter igniting to
13:48 become the first generation of stars
Sounds so good doesn't it? The problem is that it does not work.
The Big bang is said to have produced hydrogen, and helium along with trace amounts of lithium and beryllium.
The gas is said to have collapsed under gravity to form the first stars, today there are three methods of star formation.
1: compression, the shockwave of a supernova near a gas cloud compresses the gas enough for gravity to take over.
2: cooling, grains of dust enter the cloud cooling it enough to compress and gravity to take over.
3: collisions, such as two galaxies colliding and new stars forming along the collision front.
Those are the three ways stars are formed today, the problem is that it takes stars to make new ones,
1: a supernova is a star exploding rather violently, the crab nebula is the remnant of a supernova.
2: cooling, the big bang did not make any grains of dust as those are made in stars.
3: Galaxy collisions, galaxies are just huge collections of stars.
For all three things needed to make new stars, you need stars to exist to make new ones. go back to the big bang and there was no first generation of stars to make the second generation.
"We Know the cloud wants to Collapse under its own weight to make one or more stars. but rotation as well as turbulent motion within the cloud work against that fate, so too does the ordinary gas pressure you learned about in High-school chemistry class."
"Galactic magnetic fields also fight collapse they penetrate the cloud and latch onto any free-roaming charged particles contained therein restricting the ways in which the cloud will respond to its self-gravity"
Tyson. Neil DeGrasse. 2007.
Death by black hole and other cosmic quandaries.
New York: w.w. Norton and co., P. 107
“The process by which an interstellar cloud is concentrated until it is held together gravitationally to become a protostar is not known.”
Eva Novotny. Introduction to Stellar Atmospheres and Interiors, p. 279.
“Literally hundreds of ideas on how stars are formed have been advanced in past decades. However, we are still far from any real solution.”
Martin Harwit, Astronomical Concepts, Second Edition. p.405.
“The origin of stars represents one of the most fundamental unsolved problems of contemporary astrophysics.”
Charles J. Lada and Frank H. Shu. “The Formation of Sunllke Stars."
Science, 4 May 1990, p. 564.
“The formation of stars is one of the most fundamental problems in astrophysics... No current model can reproduce all of the observations.”
Ward-Thompson, D.,
Isolated Star Formation: From Cloud Formation to Core Collapse, Science 4 January 2002: " Vol. 295. no. 5552, pp. 76 - 81.
“The formation of galaxies and large-scale structure remains TMIUPIMA. . . "the most important unsolved problem in modern astrophysics.”
V. Trimble and M. Aschwanden, Astrophysics in 2000,
Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 113:1025-1114,, 2001 September.
They know self-gravity does not work to collapse a gas cloud into a star, but they do not have anything else so they just keep pushing the self-gravity model anyway.
It is the same with our moon, 3 theories were advanced and Apollo was supposed to tell us which one was correct, but Apollo disproved all 3, so they needed a new theory.
Enter the giant impactor theory where and object the size of mars came in at just the right angle and just the right speed hitting the earth where all the heavier stuff sunk down into the earth and the lighter stuff formed the moon, there is a hiccup with that as well.
Moonwalker and geologist Harrison Schmitt discovered some of them back in 1972, during the Apollo 17 mission, when he looked down and was shocked to discover orange soil at his feet.
A study about 10 years ago looked at the beads and saw hints of water. But the results also fell within the instrument's margin of error. So Hauri and his colleagues decided to look again using newer, more sensitive detection technology.
Some moon experts were skeptical, saying there was no way the team would find any water molecules. "We got a lot of comments like, 'Oh, well, we already know that the moon is dry, we've known this for 20 years,'" Hauri says.
But this time they did find water molecules, according to a report in the journal Nature.
It wasn't a lot of water. The beads had only up to 46 parts per million. But from this, the researchers estimate that the interior of the moon once probably contained an amount of water equal to that of the Caribbean Sea.
This is a problem for the giant impact theory, says Hauri. "It's hard to imagine a scenario in which a giant impact melts, completely, the moon, and at the same time allows it to hold onto its water," he says. "That's a really, really difficult knot to untie."
The giant impact theory was all they had, and since finding that the moon once had a lot of water when it could not have had any after being completely molten disproves that theory, but guess what? they are still teaching this theory too, why? because they do not have another theory to replace it.
That is modern science for you, they know things do not work but because they do not have anything else to replace them, they just keep teaching stuff they know does not work, is that true science or an agenda?
Yep.. your 💯% right.
I hear all the time that stars become black holes, that black holes are in the middle of every universe, and that black holes only feed and get bigger. Is it possible that a black hole has another stage of metamorphosis that we have yet to see? It just seems like we everything would have , or is destined to be, drawn into a giant singularity at some point if everything is about gravity.
Do not bother watching this to the end.
Now I definitely will watch
Is it scientifically wrong?
Nice vid, very interesting
(I like space vids a lot, my response is boring bc I'm half asleep)
Ugh
Another "theory" about how the universe began
How many are we up now? 23 billion?
I knew it, all we have to look at are luminous galaxies there’s too many stars out there and bigger than anything we can comprehend in a size
Black hole engines? If you keep light in a constant orbit without falling in. Black hole powered energy source. ?
Guys wake up, a new star just dropped
Oh dude I totally bet considering how red dwarfs are convective, when they turn into a white dwarf that would be explosive too
The graphic at 3:50 is wrong. The neutron star is on the right; white dwarf on the left.
It got the largest star wrong too, so many wrong things with this video
I watched a video last night that said that UY-SCUTY is not as big as they thought.
There is another possibility if a quasistar comes close to our solar system, other than complete destruction. If it doesn't barrel straight in to the center, it could instead divert all the planets and the Sun to orbit it instead. If the Earth is at a proper distance it might even settle into a new habitable zone.
The largest star is Stephenson 2-18 slightly more massive than uy scuti
Here’s an idea since a Blackholes gravity is so dense what if it’s
“the Core” of a beginning planet… just a theory of mine.
1:38 ITS A SOCCER BALL
black hole in a star thats insane
So in reality. With all these years being thrown around. This is still a theory. Remember that...
UY Scuti is not the largest star anymore. It was outsized by Stephenson 2-18. This was years ago I’m surprised this video is so out of date
3:50 - Something is seriously wrong here.
2 is White Dwarf
3 is Neutron Star
And what is Newtron Star? I've never heard of such a thing.
Neutron star? you dont know?
imma tell
Stars way larger (about 30x larger) than the sun can form into a black hole or neutron star. If the gravity wins, it turns into a black hole. but if the mass wins, it turns into a neutron star. But stars that are not that big will turn into a red giant for some time, then after that they will turn into a white dwarf.
Yea I don’t think they were asking what a neutron star was. They were asking what a “newtron star” was considering that’s how the video had it spelled out. They were just pointing out the obvious mistakes made in the video. Honestly I almost posted the same thing. When I noticed the errors I checked the comments to see if people were talking about the obvious mistakes but all I found was mostly comments about Sound Garden and their song “Black Hole Sun” until I finally found this comment!
This dude really said the sun is slightly bigger than Jupiter
Yea but can nasa help the government find billions of lost dollars?
Think about this one , our eyes and pupils are looking alike a black hole with diffrent colors around it
3:49 --> Neutron (not "newtron") star and white dwarf animations are inversed.
But how would they grow if they had a black hole in them? Shouldn't they have either collapsed on their selves or been swallowed by the black hole inside them?
If a baby black hole enters a big enough nebula with only hydrogen atoms and dark matter and energy and no heavier elements, it could form a Quasi Star
if we cant see OUR Milky Way Galaxy, How do we know this?!
they came up with a new story to match their history of the universe - big bang
Black hole stars originally formed in the early universe, but it has been extinct for billions of years, so I’m gonna report for misleading title
what is the difference between the black hole and a wormhole?
So the only reason a sun forms into a black hole when all its mass is ejected is because there's one inside the star already forming?
That's an interesting hypothesis.
No is just a delusional Theory.
@@victorforzani3433 prove it wrong with evidence.
@@Captain.AmericaV1 well when people sit on the Toilet they can imagine anything specially when they are pushing, I know for a fact that what is in this video stinks like the shit that went down the toilet when this was thought.
@@Captain.AmericaV1 I don't need to proved anything since you are not even a scientist, you may be delusional and want attention, you should go to a hospital and get your brain checked.
@@Captain.AmericaV1 Hard to prove a non existent thing doesn't exist. Not the way science works.
Just goes to show we know nothing about space , We are trying to figure things out on a human basis, When the universe is so much more we can’t comprehend.
Black hole sun
Won't you come
And wash away the rain?
Black hole sun
Won't you come
Won't you come
Won't you come
(Soundgarden)
This proves size matters
**insert sound garden pun here**
I can't believe this video didn't mention the cocaine bear story twenty seven and half times.
Fascinating 02/19/24 12:14
We are only looking back in time
Look at the size of that thing!
People still think we can cope in space. Impossible! Too many variables, never mind gravity and atmosphere in space vehicles.
Wrong again
Possible, but a loooong ways away.
After 10 billion years, this will not matter.
Who writes this stuff. Saying that the sun is slightly larger than Jupiter while showing a graphic clearly showing the opposite.
Hey man. I really dig this video man!
Not uy scuti, sephonson 218 is the biggest star ever discovered
'dense' is kind of judgemental, they're kind of focused, or concentrated
It's time to send humans on a voyage in outer space! 😳
Damn, this was after Stephenson 2-18. UY SCUTI ISNT THE BIGGEST RN MAN
As a brain scientist, I'm intrigued.
First, Steven Stills told us about Dark Stars.
Then Soundgarden told us about these.
I wonder what Taylor Swift or whoever will tell us about... ;-)
If Nibiru exists and is a red Giant and not a brown warf then perhaps the destroyer of world's hypnosis, wormwood, complete with black center, complements Hawkins theory.
bro uy scuti is 2nd biggest the biggest star in the universe is Stephenson 2-18
3:47 you spelled Neutron Star wrong🙄
Also, you said our sun would go red giant in about 5 billion years, then said it was 6 billion later in the video. The sun's remaining life is about the same age as the earth; 4½ billion years. Otherwise, fun vid
OMG GIANT COSMIC DONUT!?!?!!?!!?