Join Current Affairs Plus Course by Sumit Rewri Sir www.pw.live/study/batches/current-affairs-plus-by-sumit-sir-708041/batch-overview?activeSection=Description To Practice Daily MCQs & Daily Mains Answer Writing - Click Here - physicswallah.onelink.me/ZAZB/qws9lxfg
I choose option A Because happyness index should not be distributed based on efforts of individual. Each person has his own capabilities if we give marks based on efforts then the people who are physically disabled or dependent on other get lower which is not because of their mistakes .same people suffer from disease,they can't contribute that much effort. And because of different profession, the measurements tool of efforts may be varry. Teachers have their on contribution, a labour has his own ,and a unemployed has his own . In another view , who are jobless but taking care of their house affairs we can't measure their efforts to mark their happiness index.each and every person do different work for their living .so for an uneven society I think we should consider equal happiness for everyone .
Steps for empowering women 1) Encouraging for pursuing higher studies 2) Breaking glass ceiling effect 3) Involving more women in policy making 4) Reservation for women in promotion 5) Ensuring safety and security
The main cause behind adopting home remedies is the business mindset of the Pharma industry. Even many doctors are running behind to collect maximum money from patients. We all faced this kind of money minded doctors and hospitals at least once. That's why we move towards the home remedies. And ayurvedic treatment is also very good at many places we cannot deny this fact.
Option A. Equal hapiness to everyone. If people are happy they will contribute more.A happy mind is more creative. Creativity will lead to innovation and innovation to overall development.
Formality.. well played Sumit sir😂🙌 Btw Happy wedding to Mahesh ji..🥳 Option C : 1. Because even if there is a society with equal happiness for unequal efforts, slowly and steadily people are bound to develop a sense of rejection towards people who don't contribute much. 2. But if happiness has to be on the basis of contribution then *every contribution MUST be given equal value in society* or else the concept of proportional happiness will be defeated. Please let me know sir if something needs to be added.
Option-c If people get happiness score on work basis then 1-motivation of people to work and do good will increase, 2-every person in the society will be responsible for his/her work and responsibility, 3-stability in the society
कभी-कभी तो थक जाते हैं , इंतज़ार के थपेड़ों को सहते-सहते , कभी-कभी तो मर जाते हैं , जिंदगी से मिलने के सपने बुनते-बुनते , कभी-कभी तो उजड़ जाते हैं , अपने गुलिस्ता के ख़ुशबू को ढूँढते-ढूँढते , कभी-कभी तो हदस जाते हैं , जिंदगी की कहानी में , एक ही पन्ने पे रहते-रहते , कभी-कभी तो धधक जाते हैं , अपने अंदर की चिंगारी को समटते-समटते , कभी-कभी तो सहम जाते हैं , मंज़िल की रुसवाई का गम सहते-सहते , कभी-कभी तो दफ़न हो जाते हैं , सफ़र की तन्हाई का कब्र खोदते-खोदते | Sushmita Singh
Ans- in option A- if given everyone equal happiness than no motivation will be left for hardwork and creativity and ppl will take it for granted B- uneven happiness will be difficult to divide and distribution of it to choose which wark is more imp or other is less C- based on merit it will help only those who have opportunity but will impact negatively to the poor people Alternative- provide minimum level of happiness to all,and than above it all depends on individual capabilities to achieve as much as they can
I choose option c bcoz we should focus on skills, hardwork and make efforts to be happy..it helps to motivate the person which increases the productivity, motivation and self confidence of any person In the case of option a- it is quite impossible to provide equal happiness bcoz everyone has different situations and scenarios so noone can be equally happy In case of option B- not only celebrities or successful people have the right to be happy . Happiness is not decided on the basis of success or fame .It is the inner part of any person.
I will chose 3 because 1) in equal or moderate happiness no one will motivate to do work because they have equal happiness and result will be sorrow and pain like USSR 2) in uneven happiness resources will be in few people and this results in regionalism, separatism and violence ex- indian states 3) in merit based happiness people will have motivation that they can get happiness by hard work ex pm modi At last i want to say that happiness doesn't rely only on physical means but it's more on mental and spiritual health ❤
sir i will go for option (b) because i) happiness is something which come from within as shri krishna said ii) society is made up of different individual and it include both struggler, successful, lazy , unskilled etc they have to reach their happiness at their pace. iii) from deontology approach, one should find happiness in means of achieving target rather than achieving goal by whatever means. (means define the goal) in conclusion, as a society we have responsibility of others and uneven happiness distribution leads to more companionship , greater understanding of one another but happiness should hover around 5-9 out of 10.
Happiness C: merit based best scenario Lagta hai Effortless hapiness longo ko laziness ki traf le jayega aur ek time k baad wo happiness nahi rah payega Merit based happiness hone pe fair and achievable lagega so any one can get happiness by doing some work. Scenario A : sabhi ko barabar Dene par yaha v bahut se aise log honge jo kuch v nahi karna chahenge Scenario B unfairness bahut jyada hai jo abhi India me hai isko improve kar k merit based convert karne ki jarurat hai and chahe koi v kaam ho jo apni puri lagan se kare un sab ko same happiness milna chaiye
Sir ye kuchh kuchh capetalism and socialism ke beech difference jaisa hai. Me option (c) choose karungi kyonki isse logo ke ander ek motivation hoga society ko aage badane ka. Ye hamare economic system mixed economy jaisa hai. Per sabko opportunity same milni chahiye aage badne ki. Equal Opportunity se hi sab apna best de payenge.
Option A: Pros…Promote healthy relationships among people Cons: Lack of healthy competition for running economy Option B: Pros…Good revenue and tax collection for government large capital investment for new emerging technologies…Like… AI, Fiber broadband established every corner of country Cons: Poor living conditions for low income families Can be danger for democracy…Kranti ka Suchak Option C….Pros.. Good for healthy competition in Economy Make price for hard work So I choose C option
Mujha lagta hai option- C Best hai Reason - essa sabhi logo ke accountability fix hogi sab mehnat karenge society me positive impact aaega overall Desh ka development hoga . 🙏🙏🙏🙏 Sir please mera yea 1st comment hai mera answer kaesa hai or kya improvement ho sakte hai feedback jarur de thnku .
Option C...Reasons 1) It will promote healthy environment for competition in delivering maximum inputs for public goods 2) Merit will pursuade people in bring positive impact in the society 3)Everyone has the potential to contribute in the society in one's own way and merit will help in unearthing it
1.Sir according to me C Because if someone get reward by contributing in society then other will also inspire from that ,so it will increase the contribution in our society
I will choose option A where everyone have equal happiness . The feeling might be relative ,but equal amount of happiness will ensure social cohesion ,less hatred, jealousy and more acceptance of other. For instance person A might be a billionaire and person B a middle class workers but, equal happiness will ensure feeling of self sufficiency,self awareness and a drive for improvement if and when one wishes to achieve more.
Option A-equal moderate happiness should be there because:- There is no limit of happiness if a person is getting happiness on his merit basis then he will only focus on the merit and not enjoy his happiness.it will also exclude disabled groups because in some field they lack merit . Second uneven happiness brings social isssues and crimes in the society. If equal moderate happiness is there then all the people enjoy their life and due this their health will be better and they will contribute more in the society.Happiness and money has no limit.these things are limitless ."people never value the things which are in abundance or limitless". Equal moderate happiness keeps our life balance
Option -c Bcz due to merits based happiness system people will positively contribute to society as well as society will progress positively. 2) This will encourage people to do their best in every field so that ultimately purpose of a nation will serve
Option C - Because actions should be rewarded and it will inspire others to be more contributing to the society not only for society but also for their own happiness
I choose option C I believe happiness is all about perception. e.g A person in materialistic life may thought, he\she will become happy after accumulate enormous wealth at the same time the monks uns renunciate everything they do possess to achieve their ultimate happiness and satisfication. So when everyone will drive happiness & satisfication by doing good work for society in each and every way possible .This inturn will increase overall happiness in society build mutual trust and respect.One will stand by other in their toughest times. Where, their is no conflict ,humanism is always upheld. This will make the society -nations-world a better place to live in. If this so-called idealistic world is an option. I will definitely go for it.
In my opinion option C Because when you do efforts for your self it will give you real and satisfied happiness it is good to have uneven happiness. It will not come through borowing or given by anyone. Happiness is own product of human
Option 3 Based on merit Everyone wants happiness. So this will encourage all to put their efforts to work for their own happiness as compared to option 1 where the people whose work hard is not acknowledged. Where as in option 2 the happiness of people of low index is ignored as the average is high so if everyone start to work for their own happiness then every single person will improve and after each step it will also fuel them to work for their happiness more.
Adopt Madhya Marg /golden mean , by avoiding extremes i.e. marit based happiness as it's an emotion which is based on satisfaction of person. For example if a person is forced to become an IAS officer but she/he wants to become teacher or successful business person so that person can never be happier in first job than in her or his own dream's success...so happiness should based on merit of his own choices to do work ..same as goes for a lazy person becoz his happiness lies in doing nothing.
We can choose option A because it will give equal opportunity to all as our constitution founding parents dreamed. But in this case those who are contributing more will not be motivated and they will do compromised their contribution in society Option B is not satisfactory because it is against the Rawlsian Maxim { maximum pleasurefor maximum people} The option C also good option ut the people who do not have opportunities to contribute the society which is against egalitarian approach and Sarvodaya so they should not be punished in the form of less happiness Hence approach should be equal happiness to given to all under the veil of ignorance And those who are contributing more should given an extra happiness as an incentivve to motivate them to contribute to society more
Option -C Kyunki samj me khuss rahne balki samj me rahne ka bhi hak usi ko hain jo samajaik admi ho jese samaj aur bhi sudrid hoga aur samaj fir samaj se rashtra ka vikas hoga . Na ki asamajik log , kyuki yadi criminal's bhi yadi khuss hi rahenge to unhe apne key ka koi pachtawa nahi hoga . Udahran ke taur pe R.G Medical College me jo itni sarmshar ghatna samne ayi . Yadi ese apradhi bhi samaj me honge to keval inhe fasii pe latka dene se baat nahi banne wali . Yadi esa hota to desh me sirf ek hi nirbhaya hoti ...magar aye deen na jane kitni Nirbhaya ko purani yaade jhelna pad raha hai
I choose Option A Because here people are doing the work according to their will and efforts. So their happiness is not only output of success but efforts to reach there is also a contributing factor. In other two scenarios we are only result oriented not taking hard work and efforts in count.
First one .. sabko sabki jarurat ho , aur har koi har kisi ki jarurat puri karta hua khush rah sake jo jis kaam ke layak hai use utna kaam mile , aur usi khushi ke sath vo kaam pura kiya jaaye .. for self interest and for national interest tooo ... अज्ञेय की एक कविता है असाध्य वीणा उसमें आखिर में एक लाइन आती है सब अपने अपने काम चले युग पलट गया ...
Happiness will depend upon different factors there must not be an absolute way to it but relative .. but if compared the happiness which comes after contribution towards individuals , group , society , national and international level will be more substantive
Option B (Happiness = Materialistic + non materialistic things) (Explanation: if happiness is unequal then pepole will fight for greater happines, so there is a high chance of positive competetion between pepoles, so overall happines will remains high and continously increasing due to competation between pepole for happiness.)
I choose option c, In this situation, someone tries a improve the lifestyle of society and they try to give better skills by which they also feel happy inner side and people give this person a blessing
Ac senoriyo dono hi achhe hai A - sab brabar khush rahenge tab people self aur family ko jyada importance dega country ke liye ya wellfare ke liye toh kuch kiya nhi , C senoriyo A se jayada theek ya badiya rahega kyonki person ke dvuara ki gayi mehnat par depend karega person self aur country welfare ke liye karna chahega . Thank you sir ji
option A Since it is an objective question, I answer A because happiness is not a materialistic thing that could be divided between x, y, z. People can be happy in the most dire circumstances. Sometimes the most rich person cannot feel happiness. Inner happiness cannot be divided or distributed. For the second question: women empowerment can be achieved through these 5 steps 1. Education, especially educated women about their rights 2. women in politics- wrb is a progressive step 3. financial security- schemes pertaining to financial literacy and economic empowerment 4. better work-life balance policies 5. menstrual leaves 6. employment schemes and better representation of women in the work force
I will chose option C as this encourage the others in society to contribute toward others is much better than doing for self as it eliminates self centric thought and contribute towards will encourage others to work for works to get happiness and also leads to innovation and reason to work for others
Sir option A = nahi kyuki logo me apne kam ke prati nistha khatm ho jaye Option c= isliye nahi kyunki keval kam karne walo ko hi khusi mile Option B = motivation bana rahata hai
Option a - becoz happiness must be inclusive to promote peace and stability in society. Merit is something which is also based on circumstances, like what legacy a person carries with himself, that is why along with competition reservation is also included in constitution. Definately it will demotivate meritorious personal so at some places happiness must be based on meritocracy like in an examination competition between two students with equal faclities.
Option 'c Everyone get happiness according you their performance. Sitting person with no motivation can be haapy but in TRUE sense he lacks real happiness. Hard working person get happiness by their fulfilling target which has largest social economical benefit.
Option C I'll choose Bcoz iss se every one would be having a thirst of getting happiness and so they will be performing better deeds for society,nation and all surrounding beings. An individual usually gets deep most happiness when he do good to others,which is unbeatable.
Efforts for women to bring equality and justice- 1. Women reservation in Loksabha and state Legislative Assemblies. 2. Proper implementation of property inheritance law across the country. 3. Reservation of women in higher bureaucracy for sometime to break glass ceiling and to create sufficient role-models for them. 4. Making maternity benefit act gender neutral and to has equal contribution of both parents in child rearing. 5. Strictly implementing anti dowry provisions along with social movement to deny any shorts of dowry during marriage. It will completely change perspectives towards girl child. Along with it proper effort for bringing attitudinal change in society, breaking all sorts of stereotyping towards women should happen.
Women ka liya kya kiya ja sakta hai:- 1) economically strengthen,ex- increase budget for MGNREGA,help those works in which a large number of women work ex-vastra udhog, agriculture ka sath animal husbandry ko bdhawa diya ja sakta hai, cooperative work ex amul ko subsidy etc 2) STEM subjects ma women participation ko bdhana ka liya reservation di ja sakti hai or scholarship bhi . 3) women commission ko empower karna chahiye or isma politics nhi honi chahiye 4) rules ko strongly implement Kiya Jana chahiye or special court bnai ja sakti hai 5) privar ,shikshak and society dwara bacho ma women ka prti position attitude viksit Kiya Jana chahiye
Option C is the best option that I can choose from the three options because according to me if someone is working hard to do something his or her happiness should be in proportion to his or her efforts. This will make the people do more efforts for becoming a better person and providing to their best for the society. They will strive for happiness.
Option c with minimum standards of happiness like 3 on 10 because all people with happiness may extinct the true nature of happiness and option 2nd may divide the world into white and black may create happiness discrimnination
I choose option third because it will ensure effort based reward system in society. That is why merit based system is propounded in democracy. It will also act as a positive driving force to excel in life and make effort for better contribution in society. But it should also be supplemented by right assessment based on values along with merit. Along with this state should also ensure that a certain level of happiness should be provided to every member of society for them to just being a part of it, since it is due to their human rights and principles of human values. It will ensure equality for them to provide proper contribution for society and equal opportunity to pursue for highest level of happiness.
sir mere hisab se C situation honi chahiye kyuki isse jo log society ko serve kr rhe hai unhe society me aur contribute krne ka motivation milega aur jo kuch bhi contribute nhi kr rhe hai unhe apna bad luck kam krne k liye kuch postive krne ka encouragement milega....iss trh se society me average tareeke se positivity bni rhegi.. agr kuch glt ho to sorry sir
I choose option b because happiness itself is a motivation behind any task. everything which we do in our daily lives we all have in our mind that we want to get something from this, we want something to get satisfaction and the moment we get satisfied we will become happy . if all are already happy then most of the people in society become inactive or in other words they will become lazy which would be detrimental for any society's progress. I'm not saying that this is applicable equally on all, there may be some people who found happiness in their work but proportion of such people is low. In this case, I think equal opportunities should be provided to every member of society with minimal social and economic constraints so that everyone will have a fair chance to develop themselves and in this way get happiness again meaning of happiness may be vary from person to person.
Merit based happiness is best option for society.. Reason: people work hard to achieve happiness which will contribute to country development.. People have source of motivation due to which they work.
Third type Jo jitni mehnat karega usse utni happiness milni chahiye kyunki isase logon ka motivation nahin badhega Jo log free baithe rahte hain kuchh Kam nahin karte unhen fayda hoga vah jo bahut effort dalte Hain vah sochenge ki sabko to barabar mil raha hai ham bhi nahin karte kuchh kam isase bahut log subah economically socially physical health laziness so many problems
sir i am choosing option c because isse sab logo me happiness pane ke liye healthy competition dekhne ko mil sakta hai. sab log jyada se jyada society me contribution dene ke liye attract ho sakte hai n .
I'll go with option c because in this segment people contribute for the society because of this all people who live in the society they will also get some education, skills etc and it also shows us benevolence
Option A because all people becomes equal happy than people have equal wealth and money.All feel like equal and equal chance and also people don't feel like any type of description and alienation than people will try to harm other people.
मैं राय हैं कि समाज में uneven Happiness होनी चाहिए। क्या सभी के लिए खुशी का माप दंड एक होना चाहिए? ये तो वहीं बात हो गई कि उत्तरी कोरिया गणतंत्र का राजा दुःख और शोक में है तो पूरा देश भी दुःख और शोक में ही जीवन व्यतीत करेंगे। जिस तरह अर्थशास्त्र में मनुष्य की अनंत इच्छाओं से देश में मांग उत्पन होती है और देश की आर्थिक चक्र चलता है। ठीक उसी तरह मनुष्य अपने जीवन में अपनी निजी खुशी के लिए कार्य करते है। Uneven Happiness से समाज में मनुष्य का विकास व वृद्धि होता है साथ ही साथ देश का भी विकास व वृद्धि होता हैं। यदि हम समाज में एक सामान खुशी का माप दंड तय कर दे तो मनुष्य की इच्छाओं और विचारों की हत्या होंगी। खुशी मनुष्य को कार्य करने को प्रोत्साहित करती है। धन्यवाद
In first option if everybody have same happiness number then there will be no motivation in people to do anything better in their life. In second option, if people have more success and money they will be more happy than others . This will be discrimination with others who is trying their best bt did not getting successful but in third option if people have happiness according to their efforts to make world better . they will do their best and whole world become happy and world become wonderful 😊😊
I believe A is the better choice because happiness is a universal need, regardless of age. Whether you're a child or an elderly person, everyone deserves to experience joy and fulfillment in life. While work can bring a sense of accomplishment and satisfaction, true happiness has the power to enrich our lives on a deeper level. It not only motivates us but also contributes to our overall well-being, enabling us to live more fully and meaningfully.
0:02 good morning sir and PW team Jay Hind Jay Bharat 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳 and Happy constitution day to all❤ 3:51 sir according to me I choose option number A because as you mention in the option number a there is equal distribution of happiness to everyone which make people happy and it shows the value of happiness basically as we compare with other points if we do uneven distribution of happiness then it is against ethics value and on the other end point number third as you mentioned that we give the happiness who contributed more then who will think about the old peoples they are not able to provide the jobs and any service and according to point number third they have no right to become happy no it is totally wrong that's why option A equal distribution of happiness is important because it make our society balanced and also when we talk about economy if everyone is happy then people do more effective work and also in social reforms they perform well because everyone is happy so it make the Peaceful environment and everyone think about others it make the good society as well as the good environment for human being. It is my point of view thank you so much sir. ❤❤ 27:37 when we talk about the women as according to constitution. The constitution give many right to the women's but it is not implement in a better way basically the factor that is effecting the right of women's the thinking of society that the woman is only for the work that is practice in home yes I accept that many of the places of our country the equal opportunity and equal right is provided to the women but in the rural level there is no equal opportunity for womens basically the implementation of public policy is not better in the rural area article 15(3) is it talk about the rights of women but where is the implementation so I think government focus on the implementation of women and public policy and also government talk about the implementation and ask the question why the officer not performing well in their particular area government also collect the whole data from the office and also conduct the meeting in rural level and aware to the peoples that the women right is very important and we have to protect them so to officer play an important role in this work so I think government focus on it the responsible officers do their job in their respective manner in this way we can easily solve this problem. Thank you so much sir❤ 42:28 thank you so much sir and PW team Jay Hind Jay Bharat 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳❤❤
Sir precaution is better than cure ...I do agree that these desi nuskhe cannot cure a disease but why can't we appreciate the fact that reducing sugar intake and other refined oils and using normal foods and things like neem, haldi etc are better for our health as compared to synthetic health supplements
I think in a society happiness should not depend on merit or it must be equal for everyone. Life is not same for everyone. One may be happy with what is he doing and someone may not be happy at all after achieving a great level of success.
Option C= if people get happiness through contribution in nation building ,they understand and fill value of happiness, and those people who less or not contribute in nation ,they try to given own affert for contribution for grant more happiness, otherwise without contribution they simply take equal happiness,they not contribute, only criticon governance and society, due to this rise of conflict in society.
Bringing culture of work sharing and Mahila mandal in every society like TMKOC Teaching and awareness classes of their rights Compulsory self defence classes in school for self-protection
Happiness is multidimensional topic and it is subjective in nature . Happiness of society is usually defines as the level of education, rights and economically where this society stands. Rather than determining how society should be happy , one should have tools for human to achieve happiness of their choice which is equal opportunity and after that whatsoever they made out of it , it's thier choice and Happiness. So Happiness should be thier but the work and enviromrnt define Happiness level in society. A fair and just society will give a happy society.
Steps for women empowerment 1) women reservation 2) establishing centres for skill development focusing rural women 3) scholarship for girls for higher studies 4) combating taboo of reproductive health in our society through sex education 5) schemes like " drone didi" gives women an alternative source of subsistence
I opt for option A because Each and everyone must get eqaully because of if other rules are applied then those peraon will also suffer who dont have proper way to contribute to society eg home makers , small odd job doing workers etc
A equal modert possible hi nahi Uneven bhi sahi nahi Marit based bhi thik nHI HOGA jaroor sab ka contribution alg hu magar jo km de rha uska bhi contribution bahut important rakhta hain Is ko sab ke psychology pr choorna jiyada accha hoga qki sab keliye Happy hone ki definition alg hain ak do definition me kaise bandh kr dekh sakte hain
Mujhe lagta hai agar hum sabko ek dignified life provide kar sakte hai toh sabhi log khush rahenge. Proper jobs, good education, and medical facilities at a reasonable price. Easy access to justice and other necessities which are critical to protecting dignity and establishing a society where a sense of security prevails. By doing so we can ensure happiness for a large section of people.
Optiona A is right but. सभी लोग बराबरी में खुश नहीं हो सकते क्योंकि सभी का जीवन अलग अलग होता है किसी को किसी चीज से खुशी मिलती है तो किसी को उस चीज से दुख भी मिल सकता है इसलिए first option की only कल्पना करना ही ठीक है लेकिन real me possible nhi hai. Option B भारत में वर्तमान में ऑप्शन भी ही देखने को मिल रहा है कोई बहुत अधिक खुश है तो कोई बहुत अधिक दुख है लेकिन सब की अगर खुशी को निकाला जाए तो अधिक आएगी। क्योंकि दुखी लोगों की संख्या अधिक है इसलिए हैप्पीनेस इंडेक्स में भारत का स्थान नीचे आता। या जो लोग खुश हैं वो कम है। Option C is right मुझे भी यही ठीक लग रहा है । जो ज्यादा प्रयास करें उसकी उतनी खुशी मतलब उसका हैप्पीनेस अधिक होना चाहिए। लेकिन इस में वे लोग पिछड़ जायेंगे जो प्रयास नही कर सकते हैं।या उनके पास यह condition nhi hai।
Join Current Affairs Plus Course by Sumit Rewri Sir
www.pw.live/study/batches/current-affairs-plus-by-sumit-sir-708041/batch-overview?activeSection=Description
To Practice Daily MCQs & Daily Mains Answer Writing - Click Here - physicswallah.onelink.me/ZAZB/qws9lxfg
Congratulations MAHESH Bhaiya 🎉🎉❤😊
I choose option A
Because happyness index should not be distributed based on efforts of individual.
Each person has his own capabilities if we give marks based on efforts then the people who are physically disabled or dependent on other get lower which is not because of their mistakes .same people suffer from disease,they can't contribute that much effort. And because of different profession, the measurements tool of efforts may be varry. Teachers have their on contribution, a labour has his own ,and a unemployed has his own .
In another view , who are jobless but taking care of their house affairs we can't measure their efforts to mark their happiness index.each and every person do different work for their living .so for an uneven society I think we should consider equal happiness for everyone .
Wow sir ... Ur way of thinking is so inclusive and comprehensive 😊
Well answer
Also happiness is quite subjective.
Steps for empowering women
1) Encouraging for pursuing higher studies
2) Breaking glass ceiling effect
3) Involving more women in policy making
4) Reservation for women in promotion
5) Ensuring safety and security
The main cause behind adopting home remedies is the business mindset of the Pharma industry. Even many doctors are running behind to collect maximum money from patients. We all faced this kind of money minded doctors and hospitals at least once. That's why we move towards the home remedies. And ayurvedic treatment is also very good at many places we cannot deny this fact.
Option A. Equal hapiness to everyone. If people are happy they will contribute more.A happy mind is more creative. Creativity will lead to innovation and innovation to overall development.
Formality.. well played Sumit sir😂🙌
Btw Happy wedding to Mahesh ji..🥳
Option C :
1. Because even if there is a society with equal happiness for unequal efforts, slowly and steadily people are bound to develop a sense of rejection towards people who don't contribute much.
2. But if happiness has to be on the basis of contribution then *every contribution MUST be given equal value in society* or else the concept of proportional happiness will be defeated.
Please let me know sir if something needs to be added.
Option-c If people get happiness score on work basis then 1-motivation of people to work and do good will increase, 2-every person in the society will be responsible for his/her work and responsibility, 3-stability in the society
Congratulations Mahesh sir aapne hme editorial ko samjhe me bahut madad ki example se 😅
कभी-कभी तो थक जाते हैं ,
इंतज़ार के थपेड़ों को सहते-सहते ,
कभी-कभी तो मर जाते हैं ,
जिंदगी से मिलने के सपने बुनते-बुनते ,
कभी-कभी तो उजड़ जाते हैं ,
अपने गुलिस्ता के ख़ुशबू को ढूँढते-ढूँढते ,
कभी-कभी तो हदस जाते हैं ,
जिंदगी की कहानी में , एक ही पन्ने पे रहते-रहते ,
कभी-कभी तो धधक जाते हैं ,
अपने अंदर की चिंगारी को समटते-समटते ,
कभी-कभी तो सहम जाते हैं ,
मंज़िल की रुसवाई का गम सहते-सहते ,
कभी-कभी तो दफ़न हो जाते हैं ,
सफ़र की तन्हाई का कब्र खोदते-खोदते |
Sushmita Singh
👌👌👌
अद्भुत सृजन है॥😊
😊
Nice
Thank you everyone 🥰
Ans- in option A- if given everyone equal happiness than no motivation will be left for hardwork and creativity and ppl will take it for granted
B- uneven happiness will be difficult to divide and distribution of it to choose which wark is more imp or other is less
C- based on merit it will help only those who have opportunity but will impact negatively to the poor people
Alternative- provide minimum level of happiness to all,and than above it all depends on individual capabilities to achieve as much as they can
I choose option c bcoz we should focus on skills, hardwork and make efforts to be happy..it helps to motivate the person which increases the productivity, motivation and self confidence of any person
In the case of option a- it is quite impossible to provide equal happiness bcoz everyone has different situations and scenarios so noone can be equally happy
In case of option B- not only celebrities or successful people have the right to be happy . Happiness is not decided on the basis of success or fame .It is the inner part of any person.
ନୀତି ନିର୍ଦ୍ଧାରଣ ଯେତିକି ଗୁରୁତ୍ୱପୂର୍ଣ୍ଣ ତା ' ଠୁ ଅଧିକ ଗୁରୁତ୍ୱପୂର୍ଣ୍ଣ ନୀତିକୁ କାର୍ଯ୍ୟକାରୀ କରୁଥିବା ନେତୃତ୍ୱର ଆନ୍ତରିକତା ! -ଡ. ବାବା ସାହେବ ଆମ୍ବେଦକର
ସମ୍ବିଧାନ ଦିବସ ରେ ଆପଣ ମାନଙ୍କୁ ବହୁତ୍ ଶୁଭେଛା ଓ ଅଭିନନ୍ଦନ 💐💐❤🙏
From Odisha
I will chose 3 because
1) in equal or moderate happiness no one will motivate to do work because they have equal happiness and result will be sorrow and pain like USSR
2) in uneven happiness resources will be in few people and this results in regionalism, separatism and violence ex- indian states
3) in merit based happiness people will have motivation that they can get happiness by hard work ex pm modi
At last i want to say that happiness doesn't rely only on physical means but it's more on mental and spiritual health ❤
I think that instead of giving examples of politicians you can use examples of freedom fighters or other great personalities
sir i will go for option (b) because
i) happiness is something which come from within as shri krishna said
ii) society is made up of different individual and it include both struggler, successful, lazy , unskilled etc they have to reach their happiness at their pace.
iii) from deontology approach, one should find happiness in means of achieving target rather than achieving goal by whatever means. (means define the goal)
in conclusion, as a society we have responsibility of others and uneven happiness distribution leads to more companionship , greater understanding of one another but happiness should hover around 5-9 out of 10.
Happiness C: merit based best scenario Lagta hai
Effortless hapiness longo ko laziness ki traf le jayega aur ek time k baad wo happiness nahi rah payega
Merit based happiness hone pe fair and achievable lagega so any one can get happiness by doing some work.
Scenario A : sabhi ko barabar Dene par yaha v bahut se aise log honge jo kuch v nahi karna chahenge
Scenario B unfairness bahut jyada hai jo abhi India me hai isko improve kar k merit based convert karne ki jarurat hai and chahe koi v kaam ho jo apni puri lagan se kare un sab ko same happiness milna chaiye
Congratulations Mahesh bhaiya#"Jaise Mahesh hai"❤
Sir ye kuchh kuchh capetalism and socialism ke beech difference jaisa hai. Me option (c) choose karungi kyonki isse logo ke ander ek motivation hoga society ko aage badane ka. Ye hamare economic system mixed economy jaisa hai. Per sabko opportunity same milni chahiye aage badne ki. Equal Opportunity se hi sab apna best de payenge.
Option A: Pros…Promote healthy relationships among people
Cons: Lack of healthy competition for running economy
Option B: Pros…Good revenue and tax collection for government
large capital investment for new emerging technologies…Like… AI, Fiber broadband established every corner of country
Cons: Poor living conditions for low income families
Can be danger for democracy…Kranti ka Suchak
Option C….Pros.. Good for healthy competition in Economy
Make price for hard work
So I choose C option
Mujha lagta hai option- C Best hai
Reason - essa sabhi logo ke accountability fix hogi sab mehnat karenge society me positive impact aaega overall Desh ka development hoga .
🙏🙏🙏🙏
Sir please mera yea 1st comment hai mera answer kaesa hai or kya improvement ho sakte hai feedback jarur de thnku .
Option C...Reasons
1) It will promote healthy environment for competition in delivering maximum inputs for public goods
2) Merit will pursuade people in bring positive impact in the society
3)Everyone has the potential to contribute in the society in one's own way and merit will help in unearthing it
1.Sir according to me
C
Because if someone get reward by contributing in society then other will also inspire from that ,so it will increase the contribution in our society
A) Because a good society is one where everyone has better life standard and has also scenerio in case of A shows govt. pay everyone equal attention.
I will choose option A where everyone have equal happiness . The feeling might be relative ,but equal amount of happiness will ensure social cohesion ,less hatred, jealousy and more acceptance of other. For instance person A might be a billionaire and person B a middle class workers but, equal happiness will ensure feeling of self sufficiency,self awareness and a drive for improvement if and when one wishes to achieve more.
Option A-equal moderate happiness should be there because:-
There is no limit of happiness if a person is getting happiness on his merit basis then he will only focus on the merit and not enjoy his happiness.it will also exclude disabled groups because in some field they lack merit .
Second uneven happiness brings social isssues and crimes in the society.
If equal moderate happiness is there then all the people enjoy their life and due this their health will be better and they will contribute more in the society.Happiness and money has no limit.these things are limitless ."people never value the things which are in abundance or limitless".
Equal moderate happiness keeps our life balance
👏
Option -c
Bcz due to merits based happiness system people will positively contribute to society as well as society will progress positively.
2) This will encourage people to do their best in every field so that ultimately purpose of a nation will serve
Option C - Because actions should be rewarded and it will inspire others to be more contributing to the society not only for society but also for their own happiness
I choose option C
I believe happiness is all about perception.
e.g A person in materialistic life may thought, he\she will become happy after accumulate enormous wealth at the same time the monks
uns renunciate everything they do possess to achieve their ultimate happiness and satisfication.
So when everyone will drive happiness & satisfication by doing good work for society in each and every way possible .This inturn will increase overall happiness in society build mutual trust and respect.One will stand by other in their toughest times.
Where, their is no conflict ,humanism is always upheld.
This will make the society -nations-world a better place to live in.
If this so-called idealistic world is an option. I will definitely go for it.
In my opinion option C
Because when you do efforts for your self it will give you real and satisfied happiness it is good to have uneven happiness.
It will not come through borowing or given by anyone.
Happiness is own product of human
Option 3
Based on merit
Everyone wants happiness. So this will encourage all to put their efforts to work for their own happiness as compared to option 1 where the people whose work hard is not acknowledged. Where as in option 2 the happiness of people of low index is ignored as the average is high so if everyone start to work for their own happiness then every single person will improve and after each step it will also fuel them to work for their happiness more.
Adopt Madhya Marg /golden mean , by avoiding extremes i.e. marit based happiness as it's an emotion which is based on satisfaction of person. For example if a person is forced to become an IAS officer but she/he wants to become teacher or successful business person so that person can never be happier in first job than in her or his own dream's success...so happiness should based on merit of his own choices to do work ..same as goes for a lazy person becoz his happiness lies in doing nothing.
We can choose option A because it will give equal opportunity to all as our constitution founding parents dreamed. But in this case those who are contributing more will not be motivated and they will do compromised their contribution in society
Option B is not satisfactory because it is against the Rawlsian Maxim { maximum pleasurefor maximum people}
The option C also good option ut the people who do not have opportunities to contribute the society which is against egalitarian approach and Sarvodaya so they should not be punished in the form of less happiness
Hence approach should be equal happiness to given to all under the veil of ignorance And those who are contributing more should given an extra happiness as an incentivve to motivate them to contribute to society more
Option -C
Kyunki samj me khuss rahne balki samj me rahne ka bhi hak usi ko hain jo samajaik admi ho jese samaj aur bhi sudrid hoga aur samaj fir samaj se rashtra ka vikas hoga . Na ki asamajik log , kyuki yadi criminal's bhi yadi khuss hi rahenge to unhe apne key ka koi pachtawa nahi hoga . Udahran ke taur pe R.G Medical College me jo itni sarmshar ghatna samne ayi . Yadi ese apradhi bhi samaj me honge to keval inhe fasii pe latka dene se baat nahi banne wali . Yadi esa hota to desh me sirf ek hi nirbhaya hoti ...magar aye deen na jane kitni Nirbhaya ko purani yaade jhelna pad raha hai
I choose Option A
Because here people are doing the work according to their will and efforts. So their happiness is not only output of success but efforts to reach there is also a contributing factor.
In other two scenarios we are only result oriented not taking hard work and efforts in count.
First one .. sabko sabki jarurat ho , aur har koi har kisi ki jarurat puri karta hua khush rah sake jo jis kaam ke layak hai use utna kaam mile , aur usi khushi ke sath vo kaam pura kiya jaaye .. for self interest and for national interest tooo ...
अज्ञेय की एक कविता है असाध्य वीणा उसमें आखिर में एक लाइन आती है
सब अपने अपने काम चले
युग पलट गया ...
I choose scenerio C because work ke hisab se and logo ke contributions ke hisab se unhe pleasure mile to jyada behtar hoga
Happiness will depend upon different factors there must not be an absolute way to it but relative .. but if compared the happiness which comes after contribution towards individuals , group , society , national and international level will be more substantive
Option B (Happiness = Materialistic + non materialistic things) (Explanation: if happiness is unequal then pepole will fight for greater happines, so there is a high chance of positive competetion between pepoles, so overall happines will remains high and continously increasing due to competation between pepole for happiness.)
I choose option c, In this situation, someone tries a improve the lifestyle of society and they try to give better skills by which they also feel happy inner side and people give this person a blessing
It should be on merit basis ... This would encourage everyone to work to increase their happiness with the right intention.
Congratulations Mahesh bhaiya
Ac senoriyo dono hi achhe hai
A - sab brabar khush rahenge tab people self aur family ko jyada importance dega country ke liye ya wellfare ke liye toh kuch kiya nhi ,
C senoriyo A se jayada theek ya badiya rahega kyonki person ke dvuara ki gayi mehnat par depend karega person self aur country welfare ke liye karna chahega . Thank you sir ji
option A
Since it is an objective question, I answer A because happiness is not a materialistic thing that could be divided between x, y, z.
People can be happy in the most dire circumstances. Sometimes the most rich person cannot feel happiness.
Inner happiness cannot be divided or distributed.
For the second question:
women empowerment can be achieved through these 5 steps
1. Education, especially educated women about their rights
2. women in politics- wrb is a progressive step
3. financial security- schemes pertaining to financial literacy and economic empowerment
4. better work-life balance policies
5. menstrual leaves
6. employment schemes and better representation of women in the work force
I will chose option C as this encourage the others in society to contribute toward others is much better than doing for self as it eliminates self centric thought and contribute towards will encourage others to work for works to get happiness and also leads to innovation and reason to work for others
Sir option A = nahi kyuki logo me apne kam ke prati nistha khatm ho jaye
Option c= isliye nahi kyunki keval kam karne walo ko hi khusi mile
Option B = motivation bana rahata hai
Option a - becoz happiness must be inclusive to promote peace and stability in society. Merit is something which is also based on circumstances, like what legacy a person carries with himself, that is why along with competition reservation is also included in constitution. Definately it will demotivate meritorious personal so at some places happiness must be based on meritocracy like in an examination competition between two students with equal faclities.
Option 'c
Everyone get happiness according you their performance. Sitting person with no motivation can be haapy but in TRUE sense he lacks real happiness. Hard working person get happiness by their fulfilling target which has largest social economical benefit.
Option C I'll choose
Bcoz iss se every one would be having a thirst of getting happiness and so they will be performing better deeds for society,nation and all surrounding beings.
An individual usually gets deep most happiness when he do good to others,which is unbeatable.
Efforts for women to bring equality and justice-
1. Women reservation in Loksabha and state Legislative Assemblies.
2. Proper implementation of property inheritance law across the country.
3. Reservation of women in higher bureaucracy for sometime to break glass ceiling and to create sufficient role-models for them.
4. Making maternity benefit act gender neutral and to has equal contribution of both parents in child rearing.
5. Strictly implementing anti dowry provisions along with social movement to deny any shorts of dowry during marriage. It will completely change perspectives towards girl child.
Along with it proper effort for bringing attitudinal change in society, breaking all sorts of stereotyping towards women should happen.
बहुत बहुत शुभकामनाएं महेश भैया ❤❤
Congratulations Mahesh ji
Women ka liya kya kiya ja sakta hai:-
1) economically strengthen,ex- increase budget for MGNREGA,help those works in which a large number of women work ex-vastra udhog, agriculture ka sath animal husbandry ko bdhawa diya ja sakta hai, cooperative work ex amul ko subsidy etc
2) STEM subjects ma women participation ko bdhana ka liya reservation di ja sakti hai or scholarship bhi .
3) women commission ko empower karna chahiye or isma politics nhi honi chahiye
4) rules ko strongly implement Kiya Jana chahiye or special court bnai ja sakti hai
5) privar ,shikshak and society dwara bacho ma women ka prti position attitude viksit Kiya Jana chahiye
Option C is the best option that I can choose from the three options because according to me if someone is working hard to do something his or her happiness should be in proportion to his or her efforts. This will make the people do more efforts for becoming a better person and providing to their best for the society. They will strive for happiness.
Thank you Sumit Sir 🙏🙏
Happiness can be characterized as internal and external..
Some people express while some become happy internally..
Option c comparatively worth more
Option c with minimum standards of happiness like 3 on 10 because all people with happiness may extinct the true nature of happiness and option 2nd may divide the world into white and black may create happiness discrimnination
Thank you sir for discussion ❤
Congrats Mahesh bhai
I choose option third because it will ensure effort based reward system in society. That is why merit based system is propounded in democracy. It will also act as a positive driving force to excel in life and make effort for better contribution in society. But it should also be supplemented by right assessment based on values along with merit. Along with this state should also ensure that a certain level of happiness should be provided to every member of society for them to just being a part of it, since it is due to their human rights and principles of human values. It will ensure equality for them to provide proper contribution for society and equal opportunity to pursue for highest level of happiness.
sir mere hisab se C situation honi chahiye kyuki isse jo log society ko serve kr rhe hai unhe society me aur contribute krne ka motivation milega aur jo kuch bhi contribute nhi kr rhe hai unhe apna bad luck kam krne k liye kuch postive krne ka encouragement milega....iss trh se society me average tareeke se positivity bni rhegi..
agr kuch glt ho to sorry sir
I choose option b
because happiness itself is a motivation behind any task. everything which we do in our daily lives we all have in our mind that we want to get something from this, we want something to get satisfaction and the moment we get satisfied we will become happy .
if all are already happy then most of the people in society become inactive or in other words they will become lazy which would be detrimental for any society's progress. I'm not saying that this is applicable equally on all, there may be some people who found happiness in their work but proportion of such people is low.
In this case, I think equal opportunities should be provided to every member of society with minimal social and economic constraints so that everyone will have a fair chance to develop themselves and in this way get happiness
again meaning of happiness may be vary from person to person.
Merit based happiness is best option for society..
Reason: people work hard to achieve happiness which will contribute to country development..
People have source of motivation due to which they work.
Congratulations Mahesh sir...apke bina hmari discussion adhuri rehti h❤
Congratulations Mahesh ji🎂🎂🎊🎊🎉🎉
Third type Jo jitni mehnat karega usse utni happiness milni chahiye kyunki isase logon ka motivation nahin badhega Jo log free baithe rahte hain kuchh Kam nahin karte unhen fayda hoga vah jo bahut effort dalte Hain vah sochenge ki sabko to barabar mil raha hai ham bhi nahin karte kuchh kam isase bahut log subah economically socially physical health laziness so many problems
Congratulations 🎉 Mahesh sir
sir i am choosing option c because isse sab logo me happiness pane ke liye healthy competition dekhne ko mil sakta hai. sab log jyada se jyada society me contribution dene ke liye attract ho sakte hai n .
I'll go with option c because in this segment people contribute for the society because of this all people who live in the society they will also get some education, skills etc and it also shows us benevolence
Option A because all people becomes equal happy than people have equal wealth and money.All feel like equal and equal chance and also people don't feel like any type of description and alienation than people will try to harm other people.
congratulations Mahash🎉🎉
Ohh congratulations Mahesh sir 🎉❤
Congratulations Mahesh bro❤🎉
Sir Would choose option 1 , even though it's quite utopian. Reason - It promotes equality and it aligns with the philosophy of utilitarianism.
Option-c
Becos such people will get inspiration to do good work.
मैं राय हैं कि समाज में uneven Happiness होनी चाहिए। क्या सभी के लिए खुशी का माप दंड एक होना चाहिए? ये तो वहीं बात हो गई कि उत्तरी कोरिया गणतंत्र का राजा दुःख और शोक में है तो पूरा देश भी दुःख और शोक में ही जीवन व्यतीत करेंगे। जिस तरह अर्थशास्त्र में मनुष्य की अनंत इच्छाओं से देश में मांग उत्पन होती है और देश की आर्थिक चक्र चलता है। ठीक उसी तरह मनुष्य अपने जीवन में अपनी निजी खुशी के लिए कार्य करते है। Uneven Happiness से समाज में मनुष्य का विकास व वृद्धि होता है साथ ही साथ देश का भी विकास व वृद्धि होता हैं। यदि हम समाज में एक सामान खुशी का माप दंड तय कर दे तो मनुष्य की इच्छाओं और विचारों की हत्या होंगी। खुशी मनुष्य को कार्य करने को प्रोत्साहित करती है।
धन्यवाद
In first option if everybody have same happiness number then there will be no motivation in people to do anything better in their life. In second option, if people have more success and money they will be more happy than others . This will be discrimination with others who is trying their best bt did not getting successful but in third option if people have happiness according to their efforts to make world better . they will do their best and whole world become happy and world become wonderful 😊😊
Thank you so much sir for editorial discussion 🙏🏻 ❤️ 😊😊
I believe A is the better choice because happiness is a universal need, regardless of age. Whether you're a child or an elderly person, everyone deserves to experience joy and fulfillment in life. While work can bring a sense of accomplishment and satisfaction, true happiness has the power to enrich our lives on a deeper level. It not only motivates us but also contributes to our overall well-being, enabling us to live more fully and meaningfully.
A is best because all peoples deserve equal happiness.🙏🙏
Merit lavel,jitne jyada afert utani jyada happiness
Be positive be smile 😊
Stay happy 😁
0:02 good morning sir and PW team Jay Hind Jay Bharat 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳 and Happy constitution day to all❤
3:51 sir according to me I choose option number A because as you mention in the option number a there is equal distribution of happiness to everyone which make people happy and it shows the value of happiness basically as we compare with other points if we do uneven distribution of happiness then it is against ethics value and on the other end point number third as you mentioned that we give the happiness who contributed more then who will think about the old peoples they are not able to provide the jobs and any service and according to point number third they have no right to become happy no it is totally wrong that's why option A equal distribution of happiness is important because it make our society balanced and also when we talk about economy if everyone is happy then people do more effective work and also in social reforms they perform well because everyone is happy so it make the Peaceful environment and everyone think about others it make the good society as well as the good environment for human being. It is my point of view thank you so much sir. ❤❤
27:37 when we talk about the women as according to constitution. The constitution give many right to the women's but it is not implement in a better way basically the factor that is effecting the right of women's the thinking of society that the woman is only for the work that is practice in home yes I accept that many of the places of our country the equal opportunity and equal right is provided to the women but in the rural level there is no equal opportunity for womens basically the implementation of public policy is not better in the rural area article 15(3) is it talk about the rights of women but where is the implementation so I think government focus on the implementation of women and public policy and also government talk about the implementation and ask the question why the officer not performing well in their particular area government also collect the whole data from the office and also conduct the meeting in rural level and aware to the peoples that the women right is very important and we have to protect them so to officer play an important role in this work so I think government focus on it the responsible officers do their job in their respective manner in this way we can easily solve this problem. Thank you so much sir❤
42:28 thank you so much sir and PW team Jay Hind Jay Bharat 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳❤❤
Sir precaution is better than cure ...I do agree that these desi nuskhe cannot cure a disease but why can't we appreciate the fact that reducing sugar intake and other refined oils and using normal foods and things like neem, haldi etc are better for our health as compared to synthetic health supplements
I think in a society happiness should not depend on merit or it must be equal for everyone. Life is not same for everyone. One may be happy with what is he doing and someone may not be happy at all after achieving a great level of success.
नवजोत सिंह सिद्धू की वाइफ एक डॉ है । इस कारण घरेलू नुकसे की बात करना अपने आप में आश्चर्य की बात है।
Jab insan mar raha hota hai n to use bus ek tinke ka sahara bhi koi ashrya nahi lagta
Option C= if people get happiness through contribution in nation building ,they understand and fill value of happiness, and those people who less or not contribute in nation ,they try to given own affert for contribution for grant more happiness, otherwise without contribution they simply take equal happiness,they not contribute, only criticon governance and society, due to this rise of conflict in society.
Bringing culture of work sharing and Mahila mandal in every society like TMKOC
Teaching and awareness classes of their rights
Compulsory self defence classes in school for self-protection
Happiness is multidimensional topic and it is subjective in nature .
Happiness of society is usually defines as the level of education, rights and economically where this society stands.
Rather than determining how society should be happy , one should have tools for human to achieve happiness of their choice which is equal opportunity and after that whatsoever they made out of it , it's thier choice and Happiness.
So Happiness should be thier but the work and enviromrnt define Happiness level in society.
A fair and just society will give a happy society.
Congratulations 🙌 mahesh sir
Steps for women empowerment
1) women reservation
2) establishing centres for skill development focusing rural women
3) scholarship for girls for higher studies
4) combating taboo of reproductive health in our society through sex education
5) schemes like " drone didi" gives women an alternative source of subsistence
Option c because by this way people can contribute in our society
option c is best kyoki isse samajik vikash hoga jo desh ko kaai staro par labh pahuchayega
I differ from all three given options and would politely tell board member that - There is no path for happiness but happiness is the path.
Sandar matter hai sir
I opt for option A because
Each and everyone must get eqaully because of if other rules are applied then those peraon will also suffer who dont have proper way to contribute to society eg home makers , small odd job doing workers etc
A equal modert possible hi nahi
Uneven bhi sahi nahi
Marit based bhi thik nHI HOGA jaroor sab ka contribution alg hu magar jo km de rha uska bhi contribution bahut important rakhta hain
Is ko sab ke psychology pr choorna jiyada accha hoga qki sab keliye Happy hone ki definition alg hain ak do definition me kaise bandh kr dekh sakte hain
Mujhe lagta hai agar hum sabko ek dignified life provide kar sakte hai toh sabhi log khush rahenge. Proper jobs, good education, and medical facilities at a reasonable price. Easy access to justice and other necessities which are critical to protecting dignity and establishing a society where a sense of security prevails. By doing so we can ensure happiness for a large section of people.
Optiona A is right but.
सभी लोग बराबरी में खुश नहीं हो सकते क्योंकि सभी का जीवन अलग अलग होता है किसी को किसी चीज से खुशी मिलती है
तो किसी को उस चीज से दुख भी मिल सकता है
इसलिए first option की only कल्पना करना ही ठीक है लेकिन real me possible nhi hai.
Option B
भारत में वर्तमान में ऑप्शन भी ही देखने को मिल रहा है कोई बहुत अधिक खुश है तो कोई बहुत अधिक दुख है लेकिन सब की अगर खुशी को निकाला जाए तो अधिक आएगी।
क्योंकि दुखी लोगों की संख्या अधिक है इसलिए हैप्पीनेस इंडेक्स में भारत का स्थान नीचे आता। या जो लोग खुश हैं वो कम है।
Option C is right
मुझे भी यही ठीक लग रहा है ।
जो ज्यादा प्रयास करें उसकी उतनी खुशी
मतलब उसका हैप्पीनेस अधिक होना चाहिए।
लेकिन इस में वे लोग पिछड़ जायेंगे जो प्रयास नही कर सकते हैं।या उनके पास यह condition nhi hai।
129 days completed
Consistently ❤❤❤
Finally mahesh on screen... congratulations Mahesh bhaiya...need to see dr pal character 😂😂