"Abuse The Immunity" - How Supreme Court’s Trump Ruling Could Be Weaponized Against Opponents
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 1 июл 2024
- In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court decided that former President Donald Trump is entitled to immunity from prosecution for official actions he took while in office.
---
Patrick Bet-David, Vincent Oshana, Tom Ellsworth, and Adam Sosnick cover the biggest stories in politics, business, current events and more!
Purchase the limited edition Stars & Stripes VT Collection: bit.ly/3z6VaLM
Purchase the new "Angry Patriot" t-shirt for $34.99 at VTMerch.com: bit.ly/4c3WsW2
Purchase tickets to The Vault Conference 2024 featuring Patrick Bet-David & Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson: bit.ly/3X1JBzm0h
Connect one-on-one with the right expert for you on Minnect: bit.ly/3MC9IXE
Connect with Patrick Bet-David on Minnect: bit.ly/3OoiGIC
Connect with Tom Ellsworth on Minnect: bit.ly/3UgJjmR
Connect with Vincent Oshana on Minnect: bit.ly/47TFCXq
Connect with Adam Sosnick on Minnect: bit.ly/42mnnc4
Connect with Rob Garguilo on Minnect: bit.ly/426IG0R
Purchase Patrick's new book "Choose Your Enemies Wisely": bit.ly/41bTtGD
Register to win a Valuetainment Boss Set (valued at over $350): bit.ly/41PrSLW
Get best-in-class business advice with Bet-David Consulting: bit.ly/40oUafz
Visit VT.com for the latest news and insights from the world of politics, business and entertainment: bit.ly/472R3Mz
Visit Valuetainment University for the best courses online for entrepreneurs: bit.ly/47gKVA0
Text “PODCAST” to 310-340-1132 to get the latest updates in real-time!
Get PBD's Intro Song "Sweet Victory" by R-Mean: bit.ly/3T6HPdY
SUBSCRIBE TO:
@VALUETAINMENT
@vtsoscast
@ValuetainmentComedy
@bizdocpodcast
@theunusualsuspectspodcast
Want to be clear on your next 5 business moves? bit.ly/3Qzrj3m
Join the channel to get exclusive access to perks: bit.ly/3Q9rSQL
Download the podcasts on all your favorite platforms bit.ly/3sFAW4N
Patrick Bet-David is the founder and CEO of Valuetainment Media. He is the author of the #1 Wall Street Journal Bestseller “Your Next Five Moves” (Simon & Schuster) and a father of 2 boys and 2 girls. He currently resides in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida. 
Развлечения
*Larry Burkett's book on "Giving and Tithing" drew me closer to God and helped my spirituality. 2020 was a year I literally lived it. I cashed in my life savings and gave it all away. My total giving amounted to 40,000 dollars. Everyone thought I was delusional. Today, 1 receive 85,000 dollars every two months. I have a property in Calabasas, CA, and travel a lot. God has promoted me more than once and opened doors for me to live beyond my dreams. God kept to his promises to and for me*
There's wonder working power in following Kingdom principles on giving and tithing. Hallelujah!
But then, how do you get all that in that period of time? What is it you do please, mind sharing?
It is the digital market. That's been the secret to this wealth transfer. A lot of folks in the US and abroad are getting so much from it, God has been good to my household Thank you Jesus
Big thanks to Ms. Chisty Fiore❤️✨💯May God bless Christy Fiore services,she have changed thousands of lives globally
How can I start this digital market, any guidelines and how can I reach out to her?
The crazy thing is that Obama and Biden are pissed about this. This saved them.
They are ACTING like they are mad, there fixed it
Not if what Biden and Obama did was not done in official act‼️
They should both have their hands up and dancing. CYA for everyone
Clearly you guys do not understand these right wing lunatic Supreme Court Judges are out of control.. No President is above the law..
So a president can have someone he does not like killed?
That was GREAT retro on the Briben remarks with Justice Thomas.
If the president can be dragged to court for his official actions, then there's no separation of power. That would mean the judicial branch has ultimate power.
You’re clearly out of your mind… You guys want authoritarianism
Yes, that's how it has become. Local courts also violate constitutional rights on a daily basis. Where is the checks of power?
not really they can not create a law only interpret it and decide if its constitutional
Amen and Amen.
@@JamesTLangfordcorrect, but they are in essence, the judicial check of power for the rest of the so-called justice system we have left. They still drop the ball quite a bit, but without them keeping other courts in check there would be absolute tyranny and mayhem going on right now and definitely in the future. But given some of the decisions I've seen in the last several years, they are definitely far from objective and subject to influence from society
What this means is, we need to be electing honest people, people of integrity, people of upmost, moral character.
Power changes people …
So not Trump
Lol good one.
They murdered the last guy in 63
They're as rare in politics as the dodo bird.
30 40 years of sanity oh my God that would be amazing.
5:35 Come on Adam, you know that the 5th avenue comment was about popularity not immunity.
He doesn't know that, you're giving him too much credit.
@@ty194 Maybe?
It's not really a ruling. It's how the constitution was written. The Supreme Court merely articulated it
So Biden can have Trump killed and not be prosecuted ?
Any time the Supreme Court interprets the Constitution is called a ruling.
Lol, people who barely know how to read, stating their opinion as facts... I mean, it's not as if one could get the constitution and read himself 😅😅😅
@timw.9549 that's your opinion 🤡💩
@@CowboySanta bless your heart, you say it as it is!
This really is nothing. This immunity topic has always been This way. The Supreme Court just reminded everyone.
Bingo. Why do people not know this?
Good luck with all that.
Ha.
@@ty194because it’s not true. Explain to me then why Nixon stepped down and had to be pardoned.
The Dems are using the ruling as a political wedge to hammer Trump.
2000 Mules = Substantiated Claims.
Impeachment is the way to hold Presidents accountable
and when has that worked? You're making excuses
@@malloy5641whether it's worked yet or not doesn't change the way the constitution is written
100% we already have a process in place, this just was a stamp to make it set in stone.
@@malloy5641 It works when the impeachment is valid.. There's a reason Trump is twice impeached and TWICE ACQUITTED.. If democrats (DOJ, FBI, CIA and the rest) wouldn't obstruct, the other half of the country would realize biden should be impeached on many things...
With the exception of the abuse by the democratic congressional majority. Paul Ryan showed America the Rhinos of the republican party. Nancy Pelosi showed America the extreme left of the democratic party. Together, they represent the corruption destroying America. It took Reagan 8 years to erase the deficit. In the following 28 years the swamp ( Bush Sr. Clinton, Bush Jr. Obama) systematically ruined America for generations to follow. Think of what Trump could have done if he had 8 straight years to govern our nation. We would not be staring into the abyss we have today.
America is known to their amazing moral values in the past.. it created a great perception and admiration for the people all over the world. It's not too late to regain that perception of America.
What a hit team to take out a leader ??? ....What like Johnson did to Kennedy????
The immunity has always been there.
Robert's also said that acts of a personal nature carry no immunity.
Where do official duties stop and bribery start??
The immunity was already constitutionally in place. This is just a reminder of that fact.
So why did Nixon step down and get pardoned?
Nixon resigned voluntarily and didn't take it to the Supreme Court. They wanted to get rid of him just like Trump. The Liberal Dems have been doing this for a long time. If the Republicans don't play along there's he'll to pay. Remember Schumer and the threat, "there's six ways to Sunday......"
Nice that we have a decent Supreme Court now.
Half decent is a better way to describe it. They've made plenty of bad rulings over the last few years and have made it apparent they're subject to societal pressure. I question their objectivity completely
But there have been some changes over the past few years.
The Supreme Court changed nothing, this has always been how we’ve operated. It’s just that only recently is there a political party wacky enough to challenge it and necessitate such an opinion.
Thank you, someone who was actually educated in civics. It's exactly the same as it always was, they just got the SCOTUS to say it. The challenge is basically an attempted Mark cyst coup.
Nope this is not always how it’s been. Biden or whoever can say I’m just using my electors as long as it’s an official act.
@@degenshaw6386 No, you’re forgetting the part where it’s an official act within the core constitutional powers of the presidency. Outside of that it’s a rebuttable presumption. This is why you guys have all these wacky theories about what can be done now.
And yes, this is always how it’s been. It’s just never been necessary to say so because no political party has tried to charge a president for his official acts before.
@@degenshaw6386 No, you’re ignoring the part where it’s official acts “within the core constitutional powers”. Official acts outside of that creates a rebuttable presumption. This is why you have these outlandish theories. And yes it’s always been this way, it’s just never been necessary to say, and that’s because of the overreach of a certain party.
@@brettg274 You say that but Trump wants to use this to take away the HUSH MONEY case. He was not even President at the time. You see how Crazy he will be using this now. He will say while he was President EVERYTHING IS OFFICAL ACTS.
Its important to draw a line between a Senator having classified or a Prez with classified. You missed the point.
You need to get Alan dershowitz on the show to educate us all
would not be the worst as he's a Dem and was anti-trump till Dems went full mask-off
And here’s Adam for the……..oh airball as usual.
What did he say that was an airball
@@cadillacmoto if u have to ask that question idk what the point of answering it is. But this isn’t a “great week” for trump like that’s the story here, he’s desperately defending himself against the most powerful political persecution in our nations history. THAT and the fact that the candidate the Dems and msm has been lying their asses off to the American ppl is totally incompetent and unable to perform the most important job in the world. Those are what the story is and what is important not pretending trump just actively scored some campaign touchdowns.
@@cadillacmoto They just don’t like him because he uses his brain and doesn’t go along with their narrative
Did Adam claim the Supreme Court is “running this country”??!!!?
😂😂😂😂
Congressmen and Senators have so much immunity where they can do whatever they want. i.e. Insider trading per example. They can do whatever they want.
Prosperity doesn't come out that way overnight. What Most people see at a glance-wealth, a perfect career, purpose-is the results of hard labour and hustle over time. I pray anyone who reads this will be successful in life...
Assets that can make one successful in life
I. Forex
2.Stocks
3.Shares
You are right.
But I don't know why people remain poor due to ignorance
You are right.
A gun can also be weaponized, it doesnt mean its wrong, or all people who carry them are necessarily bad.
Let me guess.
The Supreme Court failed to define "official" actions.
Yes. That isnt their job. Lower courts have the authority and capacity to make those decisions. If there is split decisions on it then scotus has to make the decision. It doesnt start the other way. Go learn how government works. And official acts already define what they are. Official acts arent misconduct. Misconduct is not legal. Misconduct is not official acts. Its very simple
@@codyharney2997
Who defines misconduct?
@@dand33911 CONGRESS, you twit. Congress is supposed to be the power. They are the ones that create the laws, presidents are the ones that execute and enforce those laws, and judges are the ones that check those laws.
Congress defines. And if Congress does their job properly, the judges have nothing to rule over. If SCOTUS has to get involved, CONGRESS FUKED UP. THAT IS WHY THE THING THAT REALLY HAS DEMOCRATS PISSED IS THE DEFEAT OF CHEVRON DEFERENCE.
No matter who gets seated in Jan, govt power took a soccer kick to the gonads. AS IT SHOULD.
@@codyharney2997 so long story short “it’s not their decision but it will be later”
This ruling is more significant for so many other things than what is being discussed all over the news. It's a win for the small business owner and the employees forced out of their jobs d/t the covid mandates, etc...the oligarchs can't make up their own rules to control everything without this law being cited in opposition. It's a great thing for the USA.
They are already doing it. What are you talking about. Difference is now Trump got the same immunity they already have.
Please stop saying "our democracy," it confuses Democrats. We are a Consitutional Republic. 💁♀️
It's amazing how many people don't know the difference.
Not a democracy?
Cool.
Don't vote.
Thank you Kaira, you gave us another piece of the puzzle. The reason we have not been able to progress over all these millenia and EPOCHS. We keep getting reset into unknowing. Like an avatar in a video game, you dont really die. We just start over at a certain part of the game. If you begin to pay attention to the patterns of the game and get educated to its entire structure, you progress. If you give up you never progress, if you are disinterested and are blase' you languish. If you are 100% engaged in all aspects you have a chance at winning. Your chances are better if you create a group and collectively with everyones assistance you advance at a faster pace.
Souls need AVATARS to get their spritual education PHD'S AND MASTERS DEGREES in CREATION. What the mind can percieve it can achieve and here we are in this spiritual battle of ENLIGHTENMENT VS SUPPRESSION of ENLIGHTENMENT.
Pat shitting on Vinny celebrating.
Vinny “hahahaha yep” !
Not sure if he’s Beavis or Butthead!
"CORE CONSTITUTIONAL POWERS!" People are so stupid. Assassination is not constitutional!
Assassination?
@@chrisjeannette823 left-wing idiots are claiming that the SCOTUS ruling would make assassination of a president's political opponents a protected act.
Yea but what if a corrupt judge throws a former president in jail and, I don't know, the cameras aren't working amd the guards are sleeping and the "former president" just happens to hang himself? Guess Biden (Obama) wont ever see a trial for assassinating, I mean jailing a political opponent.
Presidents are sworn to “Protect the country from enemies foreign and domestic.”
Simply say you were protecting the country from a domestic enemy. Poof, immunity.
@@chrisjeannette823 Justice Sotomayor's 1st example for the minority opinion
I like how the liberal justices just completely forgot about impeachment
Please, you may do whatever you please your cult party will fallow along, they have everything to lose, why would they impeach the hand that feeds them? You can only be delusional if you believe in what you've wrote
They didn't, they tried that once and Republican Senators punted the ball and chose to send it to the courts 🐑🤡
It's Kalus Schwab and that Frankfurt School; teaching them that they always have the right away and that their way is the ONLY way.
Impeachment is for getting people out of presidency it’s not a criminal case for jail time. Big difference.
@@Ignatius------6what do you like
About liberals and conservatives ?
You guys doing GOOD WORK! Very informative!!!
Thank You!
👁️🙏👁️
The Ruling was to protect Past Prez, Not Trump lol
if you believe that you're a putz
And trump was president so it does include him lol
@@specialopssoldier1😂
@deemen7132. Exactly!! ...sad but true
(I am soo sick of these sneaky Dems!)
Is Trump not a past president?
The Supreme Court was simply following the constitution were they not?
Of law enforcement has limited immunity obviously the president should have. They considered stripping this immunity in CT but abandoned it after realizing 95% of the police would immediately quit (as they should)
An action as simple as exceeding the speed limit, to catch up to and cite a driver exceeding the posted speed limit, is a prime example. Without some limited immunity, law enforcement's job would be insurmountably more difficult.
Donald Trump once made the statement, "If I shoot someone on 5th Avenue, I won't lose any supporters." He was implying that New York is predominantly Democratic, so any hypothetical victim would likely not be one of his supporters. Thus, his assertion that he wouldn't lose any supporters was technically accurate in this context.
Yea it wasnt about crime or getting caught. It qas about the lack of supporters there, or the over abundance of left leaning ideologues there
The problem is they quote him and take everything he lays literal.. With biden being quoted and literally saying/doing things, it's just a right-wing conspiracy.. It's like when biden said people would need F-16s if they wanted to take on the government. So he's threatening us? He's saying we don't have the right to hold our government accountable and make sure they're doing everything in our interest? No lefty ever cares about his threats though lol.. Oddly enough, I was told you only needed flagpoles and to take selfies to take over the entire country..................
The left are to stupid to figure that out
no it was a reference to his level of support; and he's right, If I heard Trump shot someone I would assume Trump was doing so in self defense.
Ballsht. Even in Red states Trump could get away with it because his supporters don't care about that stuff. They love him, no matter what he does.
What do you mean only happens in other countries what about JFK?
This is not a new ruling 🤷🏻♂️ this is the supreme court confirming the law on the books. Besides, do you think that if tables were turned democrats would not used the law for protection? 🤷🏻♂️
This saves Obama and BIden. BIden's been taking millions from our enemies and Obama was funding ISIS. Why do you think Trump got rid of ISIS in a matter of weeks. MONEY DRIED UP. They should thank God for the immunity afforded presidents.
Great cut guys.
I’m a Pelicans fan and I endorse Pat’s message 1000%.
PBD doesn't understand this ruling.
He doesn’t understand many things
@@VladaldTrumptinnobody is perfect haha
PBD is on the winning side- for now. And that’s the problem.
We were raised, it doesn’t matter if you win or lose, it’s how you play the game. In order to survive we have to shift from that mindset and think, it doesn’t matter how you win or who gets hurt as long as you win.
@@lauritruta6350 sure. But maybe don’t have a podcast
@@VladaldTrumptinhuh? 😂
"Legitimate act within your Constitutional or official capacity."
This is not absolute immunity, this was already in law for years and years and years, literally nothing has changed.
But the issue that “official capacity” is exceptionally vague
@@bibwaddie2784 nope. Official acts are covered. Misconduct is illegal. Misconduct is not official acts. Its already its own checks and balances.
@bibwaddie2784 And again, let's go back to the word constitutional.
Meaning, if it's NOT constitutional, then you are NOT immune. So if you try to drone kill your political opponent or murder an innocent using Seal Team Six, you WILL be prosecuted.
@@codyharney2997
soo Biden's outright treason/destruction of this country (eg: reversing ALL Border security policies to allow chaos, crime, Fetanyl deaths, child/sex trafficking etc..is OK (not punishable) bcuz it was his "official act"...??!! NOT Good Enough!! He (& sooo many others need harsh prosecution for soo much misery, death & destruction!!)
The challenge to it is basically an attempted Mark cyst coup. How people didn't know it was always like this just goes to show how infiltrated the educational system is and for how long.
Yes, you always have to think with the end in mind
You need to read the ruling. It’s not a blanket immunity, yall keep acting like they can do what they want
It is called *procedural immunity*
Hell, the government has always done what they want, what else is new?
Count on it by Never letting a good crisis go to waste, by any means necessary.
About 11 minutes in, talking about how this could bite people in the future, consider that impeachment is a thing. If it's a crime, convict.
Diplomatic Immunity
Anytime Adam starts looking down and waving his right hand you know he has no clue what he’s talking anout
PBD, you still have Adam on your show/payroll 😂?
What did he say that was wrong or out of line
IT IS " NOT " About trump
EVERY
PRESIDENT
PAST
FUTURE
And it's always been that way.
8:52 love that clip
I missed when the last 4-5 minutes on every video wasn't an ad. I'm really curious on your playthrough rate how big of a % do y'all see drop off the moment the ad section starts ?
Sotimeyer’s dissent in this ruling calls in to question her mental acuity. Either her mental state has significantly declined due to her age or she is purposefully being disingenuous to the American citizenry. Would a call for her resignation be out of question?
I thought the same. A scotus justice using theoretical nonsense to push a narrative. Pretty showing.
Stop asking adam for his thoughts. He just rambles and you don’t have time stamps so it’s easy to skip him
Sorry you aren’t able to keep your echo chamber
@@funandgames4645 I don’t want an echo chamber. I want time stamps so I don’t have to hear a 10 minute story about nothing.
The seal team six was a question posed by trumps own lawyers
I think what Congress and Senate need to work together like it used to be,if a president abuses his office,impeached him, then tried him and removed him from office and then persecute him for his crime,that's how a normal country is suppose to work
They’re covering Biden/Obama with this…
PBD…the good news of this ruling is that it just supports the Constitution as it always has been.
Your fear mongering in 10, 20 whatever years for conservatives is moot. If we’re at that point…our rights as a nation will have to be defended. With us trying to defend the constitution right now, we don’t need to be worrying about “what ifs” decades down the road, assuming we have the same USA.
Wow! Thomas vs Biden. Wow
Thank you for that.😂
Great week and we're only Tuesday 😃😊
Omg!! Biden sounds exactly like Kamala Harris.
Why do you let Adam ramble?
He got less time than Tom and Vinny
There is no way Tom is 49 really? If he is, that makes me feel good.
YOU NEED TO PERFORM WITHIN DUTIES
Biden should stop playing political games and step aside (retirement). He’s old and dangerous to the US and the world. With all the problems that caused by Biden in past 3.5 years (domestic and foreign), I don’t think Trump would have the time for retribution.
Immunity is provided by the law. Enjoying a right provided by law is not being above the law.
This makes me nervous... I need to look into this more. It's the 1st time I've heard of anything like this.
It's always been the case. This changed nothing.
@@johnjackson9767it did change things.. how the hell do you hold a criminal president accountable now ?
The fact that the Supreme Court had to do this. Is an example of Checks and Balances. They had to act on the unconstitutional actions towards President Trump.
Sotomayor saying Seal Team 6 could be used against political rivals was a complete lie because that is not a core or official act and therefore not covered by immunity. She should ve asked to resign because she did not know this. Therefore her king comment is BS.
Oh you damn right they left will abuse the hell outta this ruling!! 😡
Republican Billionaire Harlon Crow ,is Clarence..I mean 'Uncle Thomas' Daddy...Vinny ,I like you.Can't believe you slipped up on this one.
This was already the way it was. It just hadn't been tested because both sides understood the wisdom of it. The decision breaks no new ground.
I agree with PBD.. this opens up all the pos President’s to skate for their crimes!
They've been doing it for centuries where have you been?
Adam sucks
Water is wet
What did he say that makes you say that?
So true! Will bite us later.
Adam's imitation of Trump is Goat ❤😂🎉
Read the Bible. This world will be VERY different before 50 years gets here.
Beer?! I like beer!! 😂
The thing thats interesting to me is all of the first debates took place in Sept/Oct in the past. Why so early now? 🧐
Everyone on the panel needs a haircut. Get lined up guys!
No
Good lord. Sum it up Adam
Thank y'all for putting together what I call the grandslam of Trumps God, fearing ideology getting traction in real-time.
Winning .👏🏻👏🏻
I’m with Justice Thomas Bidone like his VP are clue less when it comes to policy
The president has always had immunity it's just now the court has placed some context around the areas of immunity.
7:00 have you noticed that 30 years ago Joe Biden didn't have this lifelong stutter?
Local local local pay attention to your local vote. From your school board on up.
Lahaina, Hawaii?
Seal team 6 wasn’t from Sotomoyer. Good lord. These people don’t even know this case.
It was an argument made during the circuit court appeal hearing.
The light tends to show the truth in the end 🇺🇲
You mean like droning their enemies or raiding opponents with no knock raids?
SC voted out K. Shealy and voted in a new Trump Republican. WTG SC
Sound like a cultist lol wtf is a trump Republican ? An ass kisser ?
Tom brushing under US history of Coup d'état. Hawaii used to have monarchy and was it's own nation for example
Senator Biden reminded me of Kamala Harris! LOL
I’ll bet AOC was a great bartender. 😁
Sotomayor proved with that crap that she is unfit to serve on that bench, IMO.