COSTA: THE FUTURE OF ECL AND THE PF

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 26 дек 2024

Комментарии •

  • @chongochipompa
    @chongochipompa 7 дней назад +6

    Its GOOD we have knowledgeable and informed people like Given Lubinda.. Sense

  • @IgnatiusChirwa-w2u
    @IgnatiusChirwa-w2u 6 дней назад +2

    Given lubinda understands the law very well....these are people we need sir continue doing the good work✅

  • @marylungu-pw5rt
    @marylungu-pw5rt 6 дней назад +1

    Costa you have found the person that knows the law and know what he's arguing about..I love the knowledge of given has 🎉🎉

  • @Mw-un8yy
    @Mw-un8yy 10 дней назад +26

    20:30 in the 3 previous cases ECL was president and weaponised the same court

    • @mikebwanga4520
      @mikebwanga4520 10 дней назад +1

      that means that court has no spine, it is influenced by politicians

    • @jeffsikaonga4924
      @jeffsikaonga4924 9 дней назад

      but the same court which is now weaponised by HH ruled that ECL was eligible in 2021. and in 2026 and future he is not eligible.
      can't you use common sense for once?

    • @GodfredMundunda
      @GodfredMundunda 3 дня назад

      Loop holes in the same law

  • @WILSONBANDA-c7e
    @WILSONBANDA-c7e 8 дней назад +4

    Mr lubinda you are speaking sense sir

  • @WamuStraight
    @WamuStraight 8 дней назад +5

    Given Lubinda is a very intelligent man and would probably make a better president than HH. Costa has a preconceived position defending the concourt

  • @patricknkhoma8821
    @patricknkhoma8821 3 дня назад

    Wow 😊 given lubinda very intelligent man 🙏

  • @BupeBwalya-p6z
    @BupeBwalya-p6z 10 дней назад +34

    Lubinda's argument is making a lot of sense

    • @phillipmwamba741
      @phillipmwamba741 10 дней назад +2

      What is that argument 😂😂😂 didn't ECL held or sworn in twice?

    • @davidlungu5215
      @davidlungu5215 10 дней назад

      So then how was he ELIGIBLE in 2021 and what would have happened IF he had won 2921 elections

    • @YeboLubutoChulu
      @YeboLubutoChulu 10 дней назад +1

      @@phillipmwamba741 you and I agree, sir, that it's far more complex than that.

    • @phillipmwamba741
      @phillipmwamba741 10 дней назад +2

      @@YeboLubutoChulu no, I do not agree with you and it's not complex. Lubinda abused justice system when he was justice minister under PF. He is the one who influenced 3 concourt ruling in favour of ECL, and also wanted to amend some laws in our constitution to suit his political ambitions. Please do not believe what he says, he is the cause of all this debate on ECL eligibility

    • @andrexphiri7209
      @andrexphiri7209 9 дней назад

      Lubinda trying by all means impress his boss the case is closed bwana let lungu rest​@@phillipmwamba741

  • @RobertShawa-p3j
    @RobertShawa-p3j 9 дней назад +4

    Mr. lubinda is asking Valid question

  • @mwelwalazarous7073
    @mwelwalazarous7073 7 дней назад +2

    Mmmmmmm we are in safe hands mr lubinda has knowledge

  • @MrRodge19
    @MrRodge19 10 дней назад +15

    Why can't PF just organize themselves in unity and put a leader through party elections and get rid of individual based politics, encourage the former president to support the new candidate
    As a democratic country we need the country to put government to checks and balances other than concentrating on an individual

    • @mikebwanga4520
      @mikebwanga4520 10 дней назад

      kaya , but that can make sense

    • @Zam-B
      @Zam-B 9 дней назад

      PF was Sata and Sata was PF.This is my view,pf have no stable and no future leadership in it due to blinded mindset with corrupted thinking

  • @ernestfredrickmuyembe9665
    @ernestfredrickmuyembe9665 2 дня назад

    Great man

  • @DavisSichiko-e8y
    @DavisSichiko-e8y 7 дней назад +2

    Lubinda you are right

  • @hendrixchileshe7371
    @hendrixchileshe7371 День назад

    For me, It's just how that you "the opposition" are free to walk in any media house and debate without fear... If you ask me, after upnd are no longer in power, I would surely say they brought freedom of speech...❤

  • @elijahchola9668
    @elijahchola9668 9 дней назад +2

    Hon lubinda 👏👊💪 salute you

  • @terrymupeta1141
    @terrymupeta1141 8 дней назад +1

    Indeed you are, Hon. Former minister of Justice, sir.

  • @emmanueltembo-ki2gz
    @emmanueltembo-ki2gz 10 дней назад +7

    I wonder one thing,why was it ok for the court to review its decision 3 times before and it is not ok for this one now?

  • @DavisSichiko-e8y
    @DavisSichiko-e8y 7 дней назад +1

    Woow lubinda we love you am with you

  • @KasongoNkole
    @KasongoNkole 10 дней назад +17

    Given Lubenda is always misleading in terms of the way he comes out remember the issues of Bill 10,the issue of Mps who over stayed in office,even pro 2021 elections he was saying that after the elections he'll be saying banyala now supporting what he himself knows very well that the constitution which ashard ECL into office was the 1991 constitution which states that twice elected and twice sworn in that's all now why does he want the court to decide that ECL is eligible based on the constitution which he signed after becoming president ?

    • @HilaryMeleki
      @HilaryMeleki 10 дней назад +1

      This man Lubinda has never in his life defended the Zambian constitution, was he not one of the minister who deliberately chose to break the law by staying in office when cabinet was dissolved? He should be the last one to complain.

  • @INNOCENTMABOMBA-o7h
    @INNOCENTMABOMBA-o7h 6 дней назад

    Given lubinda you explained well.

  • @innocentmalambo8556
    @innocentmalambo8556 10 дней назад +12

    They indicated the reasons for the change in judgement.

  • @hassanbanda3440
    @hassanbanda3440 4 дня назад

    In Zambia we still have wise politicians, hon Given lubinda very wise submissions

  • @BulayaEmbela
    @BulayaEmbela 2 дня назад +1

    The problem here is the Judiciary.We the people are slowly losing trust in them.

    • @tina1762
      @tina1762 2 дня назад

      Their interpretation of the law depends on who appointed them. Zero professionalism.

  • @bobobobo8507
    @bobobobo8507 10 дней назад +8

    Mr Linda kindly stand on PF

    • @phillipmwamba741
      @phillipmwamba741 10 дней назад

      😂😂😂 yama, read the constitution on the qualifications for presidency?

    • @josephsitali2807
      @josephsitali2807 10 дней назад

      Lubinda does not qualify to be Zambian president according to the constitution

    • @Hannah-jk3dk
      @Hannah-jk3dk 10 дней назад

      He could but as usual looking hypocritically at one man

    • @Jay-lr1bp
      @Jay-lr1bp 9 дней назад

      He didn't even qualify to stand in 2021

    • @josephchipulu7643
      @josephchipulu7643 9 дней назад

      He's a junkie

  • @muchindumusowe
    @muchindumusowe 10 дней назад +14

    I wish Given Lubinda was a lawyer not a junk that he is! He has proved to be headless and dull to say the least!

  • @NkhataGivenjay
    @NkhataGivenjay 10 дней назад +13

    This man is vested with wisdom I mean these are big machines ❤

  • @tydmusic4068
    @tydmusic4068 6 дней назад

    Very much sense from your speaking atleast someone gets to understand whatever is going through in this our country

  • @ackimbanda6334
    @ackimbanda6334 6 дней назад +1

    The problem with politicians, especially in Africa, is that they lack honesty, decency, and consistency, PF brought about this vicious cycle of interference in the judiciary. Now, they want to cry the loudest against the same weapon they created.

    • @tina1762
      @tina1762 2 дня назад

      And soon UPND shall cry about the same if one will have to finish someone's term, ruling just for a few hours.😂

  • @NandiMaila
    @NandiMaila 8 дней назад +2

    This is incredible explanation Sir Mr Given you are actually ploughwing deep sir extremely exerllent

  • @elvisxvesmulowa
    @elvisxvesmulowa 10 дней назад +8

    Honorable Lubinda you are great

    • @victormusonda3126
      @victormusonda3126 10 дней назад

      Honorable you know how to elaborate the law well sir. We will wait and see patiently ...

  • @KennedyMutoba
    @KennedyMutoba 9 дней назад +3

    Very wise vice president

    • @bristolkanimba9520
      @bristolkanimba9520 9 дней назад

      He is not wise he's just arrogant pf is devided into three fuctions and your wise vice president is saying there are no fuctions meanwhile one of the groups is holding a certificate of registration if someone is holding a certificate gotten from a legal issuing body

  • @pious4789
    @pious4789 10 дней назад +6

    It seems that most people debating this case are not talking about the legal principle of retrospective effect. The 2016 constitutional amendment cannot be applied backwards, that's were the error was made.

  • @SylvesterMufalali
    @SylvesterMufalali 7 дней назад +1

    Mr Lubinda forget ECL , just stand yourself.

  • @BenjaminBunyololo-n6n
    @BenjaminBunyololo-n6n 7 дней назад +1

    Lubinda you are feeling it now

  • @georgemuyendekwa1245
    @georgemuyendekwa1245 10 дней назад +19

    Lungu was never disqualified but just reminded that he served 2 terms and he is not eligible for 3rd term..

    • @brianchiteta6544
      @brianchiteta6544 10 дней назад +1

      CORRECT!!! Nothing less, nothing more.

    • @KelvinKawina-c9h
      @KelvinKawina-c9h 10 дней назад +1

      The man we're telling all these is dull he can't even stand up for him self as the candidate

    • @moonomundike8882
      @moonomundike8882 10 дней назад +1

      Lol couldnt have said it better

    • @simonphiri1481
      @simonphiri1481 10 дней назад

      Spot on!

  • @bwalyaleonard
    @bwalyaleonard 10 дней назад +6

    Mr lubinda you are brilliant

  • @briansakala8707
    @briansakala8707 9 дней назад +1

    From Mr Lubinda's statements,the difference is the new faces meaning it's possible ECL was favored then right bcz they were ok with the then judgement. I wish he debated stating the article from the constitution that say elected twice, sworn in twice and held office twice and not the rulings that were made🙏

  • @lukupwamatthew
    @lukupwamatthew 10 дней назад +3

    Lubinda is so intelligent

    • @simonphiri1481
      @simonphiri1481 10 дней назад +1

      Lubinda is not so intelligent

    • @Jay-lr1bp
      @Jay-lr1bp 9 дней назад

      In a world of idiots

  • @peterpapushi
    @peterpapushi 10 дней назад +1

    The difference is that in 2021 the court omitted the provision of amendment act 1 of 2016 which states that the constitution for all purposes of the amendment act 1 of 2016 refers to the constitution of Zambia 1991 and that constitution states that a term is any period served by a president until the next election. The 2015_16 term was served under the 1991 constitution and so that term counts as one term. The constitution was amended in 2016 but the law does not apply retrospectively.

  • @KalungaTembo-e3s
    @KalungaTembo-e3s 9 дней назад +1

    Great man wise

  • @chrislembalemba4182
    @chrislembalemba4182 10 дней назад +1

    The level of bitterness against HH is worrying. Every presidency has tenure. Accept it and move on. I feel sad for Bo Lubinda

  • @danielmwanza2636
    @danielmwanza2636 19 часов назад

    I think the judiciary in Zambia should be made free and independent , this will make judges to choose among themselves to bring in speaker of Parliament...

  • @bornifacengandu873
    @bornifacengandu873 10 дней назад +4

    Didn't the ConCourt say that they didn't take the repealed Article 35 into consideration when delivering the previous 3 judgements?

    • @Allideas.
      @Allideas. 9 дней назад

      Even Costa didn't first study the judgement before engaging in this conversation, reasons were given but he is smiling incompetently 😊

  • @aaronmwapezulu7814
    @aaronmwapezulu7814 6 дней назад

    Political and Public discourse about the 2016 constitutional amendments.
    Critics argue that Edgar Lungu's approach to the 2016 constitutional amendments may have been influenced by a desire to extend his tenure as president. Here are some key points that support this view, particularly regarding the definition of the term of office:
    1. The "Third Term" Controversy
    Lungu argued that his first term (2015-2016) did not count as a full term because he assumed office following the death of President Michael Sata and only served the remainder of Sata's term. The 2016 amendments introduced a clause that defined a term as serving at least three years of a five-year presidential term. This legal interpretation allowed Lungu to stand for re-election in 2021, despite opposition claims that this constituted a third term.
    2. Strategic Constitutional Changes
    Some analysts argue that the amendments were designed to create ambiguities that could be exploited. For instance, the timing of the amendment and Lungu's subsequent legal battles to run in 2021 suggest a deliberate effort to maximize his time in office.
    3. Lungu’s Public Statements
    Lungu was vocal in defending his eligibility, often stating that he would respect the Constitution but also challenging those who opposed his re-election bid. This dual stance fueled speculation about his long-term intentions.
    4. Weakening Democratic Norms
    Critics argue that while the amendments included progressive elements, such as the 50%+1 rule and the Constitutional Court, Lungu’s administration may have used these reforms to solidify power rather than strengthen democracy. For example, his critics pointed to alleged political interference in the judiciary, particularly the Constitutional Court, which ruled in his favor regarding the term limit issue.
    5. Historical Parallels
    Zambia’s history includes leaders attempting to extend their rule (e.g., Frederick Chiluba’s failed third-term bid). Some viewed Lungu's actions as part of this pattern, raising fears of democratic backsliding.
    While Lungu ultimately lost the 2021 election to Hakainde Hichilema, this debate remains a significant chapter in Zambia’s political history, reflecting concerns about the balance between constitutional reform and political ambition.

  • @chitalukalandanya2721
    @chitalukalandanya2721 7 дней назад +1

    A person shall hold office twice, two terms, 10 years and not more. If Edgar Lungu is allowed to stand again and wins, it will mean that he will be in office for more than 10 years. The fact that the court reviewed this matter 3 times, it means they knew his was not eligible. They only allowed him to stand because he was president. Let PF choose another person to stand and let lungu rest.

    • @chilandojohn8313
      @chilandojohn8313 7 дней назад

      They did things and made decisions thinking Zambians will always be gullible... Otherwise, they're running out of time to pick a new leader.

    • @tina1762
      @tina1762 2 дня назад

      That's why to be fair, technically ECL is eligible but only for 3 years! Not more. Then he will have ruled for 10 years. UPND are happy forgetting that the same can happen to them. If the president dies 3 months to finishing his term, (God forbid)will Veep accept that she has ruled the country for a full term after just 3 months? These politicians are always shooting themselves in the foot.

  • @dicksonmwanza4424
    @dicksonmwanza4424 8 дней назад +1

    Answer voted twice and sworn in twice.that is the issue here.were tterms not completed.John sangwa said it that ecl was not eligiible.he is vindicated.

  • @GiftKasongo-j5y
    @GiftKasongo-j5y 10 дней назад +7

    He was eligible in 2021 but not in 2026 , reason court said, because of the courts mistake they had to made that is why he was eligible now the judgement it has changed. uwawa tabula kabepesho, there is no plan B but threatening the nation nama propaganda fipobosa fyekafyeka fi pf

  • @bobobobo8507
    @bobobobo8507 10 дней назад +4

    Lubinda Why do he stand himself
    If really want to save PF as a party

    • @miyoba1
      @miyoba1 10 дней назад

      He's a Chola boy 😂

    • @miyoba1
      @miyoba1 10 дней назад

      He's a Chola boy 😂

  • @davidsitungu8567
    @davidsitungu8567 10 дней назад +5

    Costa if he says the judgment was influenced then what are they saying about the judgment given in thier favor during their time in office!

    • @miyoba1
      @miyoba1 10 дней назад

      Good point, the same court broke the law during the petition but they were happy bcuz it benefited them.

  • @TheWizardQ
    @TheWizardQ 4 дня назад

    The Seven Judges clearly stated that ECL was only eligible in 2021 because the Court said he was in error. If the Court said he was eligible in 2021 whether in error or not he was eligible. One the same court comes back and says they made an error, and they even explained the error that was made in interpreting the classification of his first term, then correct their error and say he is not eligible, he becomes eligible. The error that was in 2021 was to declare his first term as not being a term, but this time around they explained which law should be used to classify the first term.

    • @TheWizardQ
      @TheWizardQ 4 дня назад

      And I think Costa was not prepared enough to handle this interview.

  • @chilandojohn8313
    @chilandojohn8313 7 дней назад

    When he said our Constitution document has Laguna we all raised in anger and said the document is absolute. But now we are seeing plainly how the absolute document is making these leaders argue absurdly. The document needs amendments!
    Sworn in twice or elected twice... had he been elected would he have just saved the remainder of the disputed term? PF did deliberately a lot of things hoping that Zambians will continue being gullible and then the tides change. They are being dealt with there own bitter medicine.

  • @stanleysiasinyanga5022
    @stanleysiasinyanga5022 10 дней назад +6

    Can Lubinda answer the question, "did Mr. Lungu's period in office from 2015 to 2016 constitute a term of office? The answer to this question is the crux of the matter.

    • @misumbidickson266
      @misumbidickson266 10 дней назад

      Isn't a term supposed to be 5 years?

    • @bornifacengandu873
      @bornifacengandu873 10 дней назад

      ​@misumbidickson266 which part of the constitution (before 2016) defined a term as 5 years? In my understanding, a term was not defined but it was strict that as long as you've been sworn in, then that counts as 1

    • @mikebwanga4520
      @mikebwanga4520 10 дней назад

      he answered and you know what the constituition says

  • @NelsonBanda-p1c
    @NelsonBanda-p1c 10 дней назад +7

    Weldone lubinda very wise man keep it up, fight for pf we are with you our votes are yearning for for 2026 to remove HH

  • @tituskabwe7166
    @tituskabwe7166 9 дней назад

    Powerful

  • @nsamumoonga7500
    @nsamumoonga7500 10 дней назад +2

    Given Lubinda is trying too hard to spin. The judgement is clear and straightforward. All the questions Given is raising were answered in that judgement. He is obviously pandering here.

  • @EdgarMulenga-b3c
    @EdgarMulenga-b3c 9 дней назад +1

    Lungu's resistance to stepping down is so worrisome

  • @sonachij
    @sonachij 9 дней назад

    Super leader

  • @restonemaambo6083
    @restonemaambo6083 10 дней назад +4

    Arrogant even in opposition, I can't imagine that.

    • @seponangana939
      @seponangana939 10 дней назад

      Imagine,a seemingly brilliant fellow deciding to be misleading,lawless and criminal

    • @Zam-B
      @Zam-B 9 дней назад

      Imagine the things they use to do when they were in power??

    • @andrexphiri7209
      @andrexphiri7209 9 дней назад

      So arrogant this lubinda guy

  • @BrianMwandila-os1du
    @BrianMwandila-os1du 10 дней назад +1

    I think these are the people who are making the life of former president,Edgar lungu to be tough and in chaos.Edgar lungu might be a good leader but the people surrounding him i think they are after there interest.Given Lubinda you should stand if you want PF to rule,kaili the party has got the same goals and manifestos regardless of who stands.Stop misusing Mr lungu for your own interests,if you want power just stand!

  • @BornfaceMumba-fq5zz
    @BornfaceMumba-fq5zz 8 дней назад

    The mistake that was made in the previous judgment was that article 106/3 of 2016 constitution was applied retrospectively. The constitution that was in effect when Ecl was voted into office in 2015 was the 1996 one in which through article 35 qualifies the period between 2015 and 2016 that Ecl held office as a full term.

  • @PanAfricanist1963
    @PanAfricanist1963 10 дней назад +1

    Encourage the old man to retire. He did his fair share of destruction to the country. We can't go backwards.

  • @MutamboPrecious-n1x
    @MutamboPrecious-n1x 10 дней назад +3

    Mr lubinda are sure during the previous govt there were no one abusing to their powers thats a big lie honorable

  • @SanfordHanyinda-ic1ot
    @SanfordHanyinda-ic1ot 9 дней назад +1

    Wanyala and his bitter team should or must have discussed this matter in court and not outside the judicial system. Zayelo should have gone to court. Judges are not politicians and can't be expected to appear on this forum.

  • @saidimwanza8529
    @saidimwanza8529 9 дней назад

    Costa good question because the president is the commander in chief and has special powers to appoint and fire officials appointed by him

  • @NandiMaila
    @NandiMaila 8 дней назад

    Exceptional sucumstances what guys

  • @philkazanga
    @philkazanga 10 дней назад +2

    What do you expect from PF? They're crying babies now

  • @dennisjere8081
    @dennisjere8081 10 дней назад +2

    Case law does not override the law🧐But play reference

  • @GiftKasongo-j5y
    @GiftKasongo-j5y 10 дней назад +4

    Costa you are a man ❤

  • @augustinekabamba7367
    @augustinekabamba7367 9 дней назад

    Are you guys discussing the same court ruling that I listened to or it's a different one. Both the guest and the intervier seen not to have the understanding

  • @SimuiSimui-mc5wd
    @SimuiSimui-mc5wd 10 дней назад +1

    Selfishness & bitterness in one person a cadre for ECL Given Lubinda😂😂😂😂

  • @imasikumbumwae9202
    @imasikumbumwae9202 10 дней назад +5

    Given Lubinda and Nakachimba are the two playboys who misled sleeping ECL.

  • @MpofuChristopher
    @MpofuChristopher 9 дней назад

    ECL before the 2021 elections threatened the judges not to judge to the contrary in line with the Kenyan courts that ruled against the then incumbent Uhuru Kenyatta.

  • @richardmwewa2454
    @richardmwewa2454 9 дней назад +1

    Someone want to answer the question and busy asking another question 🤔

  • @masuzyomweso8743
    @masuzyomweso8743 9 дней назад

    we wasting our time, we all know what happened here, its happened before, Pf just had a taste of their own medicine! the fact is whichever govt is in power runs the judiciary, PF should not complain about this, it is the result of their own past actions

  • @khamahachunde6681
    @khamahachunde6681 9 дней назад

    Surprised to learn the former minister of Justice doesn't understand what is known as "persuasive authority" and "Binding Authority".

  • @SylvesterMufalali
    @SylvesterMufalali 7 дней назад

    It was wrong Judgements in the past because Judges were threatened not to judge properly. It's correct now because the judgement is not interfered with

  • @NandiMaila
    @NandiMaila 8 дней назад

    Hard Rock😂😂😂 sir

  • @gershomkabaso2064
    @gershomkabaso2064 10 дней назад

    Communication Principles

  • @PhilKazanga-n1t
    @PhilKazanga-n1t 10 дней назад +8

    It's cold outside government.. PF members are bitter

  • @wonanisimpemba9385
    @wonanisimpemba9385 10 дней назад +1

    You should introduce sign language interpreters

  • @CatherineMachinyanga
    @CatherineMachinyanga 10 дней назад +7

    And for your own information, not even the real top pf officials want Lungu

  • @elvisxvesmulowa
    @elvisxvesmulowa 10 дней назад +1

    Costa u are a good interviewer but the only challenge is that u don't give time to the people u are interviewing to express themselves.

  • @bristolkanimba9520
    @bristolkanimba9520 9 дней назад

    In Zambia constitution court in Zambia is the highest on constitution matters my question to Given lubinda where he said they will go back to the same court what will happen should constitutional court throws out their appeal because this is the most likely. I think Lubinda is wasting time on a none starter matter instead of re organizing themselves for 2026 election which is just around the corner.

  • @TheWizardQ
    @TheWizardQ 4 дня назад

    Judges Charles Zulu and Jushua Banda were dismissed by ECL in 2018, a lot of Zambia Police personnel were dismissed etc, Mr Lubinda is not sincere.

  • @jerrykapesha-h2o
    @jerrykapesha-h2o 8 дней назад

    Ba UPND cadre judges babepelefye ECL akasangwapo pa ballot.

  • @bcr1103
    @bcr1103 9 дней назад

    6:33 Hon former Justice Minister, don't you refer to those as case studies? What do you mean they don't have the power?

  • @JohnTembo703
    @JohnTembo703 10 дней назад +1

    So you want it to go to the Supreme court?

  • @KissingerHanangala
    @KissingerHanangala 9 дней назад

    Sad for these who survives through ECL monies

  • @MpofuChristopher
    @MpofuChristopher 9 дней назад

    He didn't dismiss any because they adjudicated in his favor.

  • @reubenjedidiahchipemba1608
    @reubenjedidiahchipemba1608 9 дней назад

    Even during Bill 10 he was misleading the masses, even after the Apex court has made a decision yet still says ECL will be on the ballot 😂😂

  • @Christistheway178
    @Christistheway178 10 дней назад +1

    It’s funny how we understand different.

  • @AlterEgo-v7c
    @AlterEgo-v7c 9 дней назад

    We didn't have anyone abuse power??? when PF was in power

  • @kangwamngandu3671
    @kangwamngandu3671 8 дней назад

    SOSo How exactly is Lungu going to stand in 2026 , ECZ will not accept his his nomination

  • @SanfordHanyinda-ic1ot
    @SanfordHanyinda-ic1ot 9 дней назад

    Piyefu should begin to respect institutions of governmenance or be made to respect them to avoid anarchy in the country.

  • @phillipmwamba741
    @phillipmwamba741 10 дней назад +5

    I have no doubt Given lubinda is a big problem in our Zambian politics and being justice minister during PF, he had his dirty hands in manipulating our justice system and that is why we are here still discussing the constitution which directly and self interpretaly on presidential limit. This guy abuse the justice and he need to be investigated and tried for the abuse of law for his political interests.

  • @NandiMaila
    @NandiMaila 8 дней назад

    Am sure plan B be has been answeard to Mr coster or those interested it's a team work involved.

  • @SundayThole
    @SundayThole 9 дней назад

    Coster is finished, he is one side

  • @eliasphiri9521
    @eliasphiri9521 8 дней назад

    Back

  • @stanleysiasinyanga5022
    @stanleysiasinyanga5022 10 дней назад +1

    Lubinda should discuss the substance of the case as opposed to discussing the power of the court to revisit the case. If the court's earlier judgement was faulty or erroneous, that cannot be sustained forever in a well-functioning judicial system.
    "'The proof of the pudding is in the eating"

  • @hmmwila
    @hmmwila 9 дней назад

    Why does this PF team B, not recognized by registrar of societies, want to stick with ECL? They don't have anyone else?