Thanks for doing this video I enjoyed it since I barely see anyone discuss Hoppeanism on RUclips and I think it deserves more recognition since Hans Hermann Hoppe's books are very interesting
Just an insight I wanted to put, What most people think Anarcho Capitalism would be is that everyone would have their small little privatefirms protecting their private property but in reality that's not what would happen, protecting your property would be the most ESSENTIAL thing in an ancap society so the demand for these firms would be really high that it would become very scarce. But this is a good thing actually, because this is exactly what would incentivies people to create private cities so people can mutually benefit each other by sharing these private firms, and this is also exactly the answer to "muh no ability to pay for private firm" this is so fucking based !!
I was wondering how an ancap society would stop centralization and eventually create the state again Take all USA counties and turn them into private cities, take one midwest county. Due to the region's cultural and ethnic homogenity, you can easily convince a county to fuse with yours (or form an aliance with them), then you go fusing counties and suddenly your county (or alliance of counties) passes a certain threshold of power that it can beat their neighbours even if all of them turned against you, that's when you form an empire. This happened with the greeks, romans, the mongols, etc. You could prevent that with a no surrender scorched earth culture but even that could be subject to weakening by several psyop tatics we have nowadays and would fade away in a few generations. The bigger a state gets, the harder it is to leave it (due to emigration control, and cultural and/or geographical barriers). If people can't leave, they are forced to put up with bad practices and those bad practices turn the ancap state into a normal state.
@@SoMuchFacepalm better economic deals, standardization of legislature, greater geopolitical influence, sharing of technology and information, reduced cost of border maintenance (cause both counties lose a border), easier aid and recovery in case of emergencies, increased militar power and security, several exploitable geographical advantages, etc. These are the benefits, but remember that people feel the need of unification even when it isn't actually that economically advantageous, they just need to be from the same culture and religion.
We already have a monopoly, we call it the government.
Anarco-capitalism is libertarianism taken to its logical conclusion.
And it's glorious
Neo-Feudalism with amplified notions of hierarchy - ultimately totally coercive by Power.
@@dennisyoung4631
"I have no idea what capitalism, feudalism or a hierarchy is"
Thanks for doing this video I enjoyed it since I barely see anyone discuss Hoppeanism on RUclips and I think it deserves more recognition since Hans Hermann Hoppe's books are very interesting
Just an insight I wanted to put, What most people think Anarcho Capitalism would be is that everyone would have their small little privatefirms protecting their private property but in reality that's not what would happen, protecting your property would be the most ESSENTIAL thing in an ancap society so the demand for these firms would be really high that it would become very scarce. But this is a good thing actually, because this is exactly what would incentivies people to create private cities so people can mutually benefit each other by sharing these private firms, and this is also exactly the answer to "muh no ability to pay for private firm" this is so fucking based !!
I was wondering how an ancap society would stop centralization and eventually create the state again
Take all USA counties and turn them into private cities, take one midwest county. Due to the region's cultural and ethnic homogenity, you can easily convince a county to fuse with yours (or form an aliance with them), then you go fusing counties and suddenly your county (or alliance of counties) passes a certain threshold of power that it can beat their neighbours even if all of them turned against you, that's when you form an empire. This happened with the greeks, romans, the mongols, etc. You could prevent that with a no surrender scorched earth culture but even that could be subject to weakening by several psyop tatics we have nowadays and would fade away in a few generations.
The bigger a state gets, the harder it is to leave it (due to emigration control, and cultural and/or geographical barriers). If people can't leave, they are forced to put up with bad practices and those bad practices turn the ancap state into a normal state.
@@BRAZILIAN_MIKU "you can easily convince a county to fuse with yours"
But why would they? What does anyone get out of it?
@@SoMuchFacepalm better economic deals, standardization of legislature, greater geopolitical influence, sharing of technology and information, reduced cost of border maintenance (cause both counties lose a border), easier aid and recovery in case of emergencies, increased militar power and security, several exploitable geographical advantages, etc. These are the benefits, but remember that people feel the need of unification even when it isn't actually that economically advantageous, they just need to be from the same culture and religion.
Short, concise, fair, informative.
B A S E D
Keep up the good work! You gained a new sub
money
Based