For any serious science enthusiasts/students, please take the science in this podcast with a grain of salt. This podcast is filled with misleading science and inconsistencies. For the sake of science, I had to comment on this video. I really admire the very thoughtful comments by some viewers. People have already pointed out many flaws in the paper as well as the podcast. Kudos to Arif for thinking about some of the most fundamental problems in physics. Arif, if you are really serious about physics, I highly recommend you take some serious physics and mathematics courses. If you want people to consider you seriously, please do not present some half-baked ideas sprinkled with some religious/spiritual BS. Science is a serious profession. Science has to be lucid, not vague. It has to be explanatory, predictive, and verifiable. Also, science can't be based on metaphors and speculations. Please leave BS science mixed with religious stuff to gurus. They are doing a good job of it already. If I go on to point out the flaws in the whole podcast then it will be a very long post. Anyway, let's jot down some general feedback: 1. String theory (ST) is not an alternative to GR. It's a mathematical way to explain quantum gravity. 2. Even though string theory is mostly a mathematical construct, it does predict things. LHC is trying to test predictions: tinyurl.com/2s374fnx 4. Black hole is a prediction of GR. In physics, there are many ways to observe things (it doesn't always have to be a picture). The first black hole was identified in 1971. 5. For a theory to be good, it has to explain the existing observations and make predictions. For instance, GR wasn't considered a serious theory until its prediction was verified in experiments /observations (tinyurl.com/cd33hjwp / en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tests_of_general_relativity) 6. GR is a solid theory (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tests_of_general_relativity). Any seasoned physicist wouldn't doubt it. It works at many different distance scales but it fails at the quantum scale. And, I think it's fine because GR is geometric theory and it's not easy to understand geometry at that quantum scale. For example, is spacetime discrete or continuous? At large scale spacetime is continuous and you can use differential geometry to study spacetime (which is what GR does). 7. The whole premise of why time cannot be a dimension just on the wrong assumption that we can't travel back in time is wrong. 8. This whole obsession with 4 and trying to connect that 4 to science is pure nonsense. Even trying to associate "high" and slowness after smoking weed with a higher dimension shows how immature this podcast is. This is called pseudo-science. 9. The explanation of matter-antimatter asymmetry problem is wrong. I am pretty sure anyone who has taken basic particle physics must have noticed the inconsistencies. Most of the time, when people cannot explain something they invoke god. A scientist would never do that. He/she would always accept that I do not understand it. This means I need to reinvestigate and try to come up with something better. 10. Nobel prize for the quantum hall effect wasn't given for proving the existence of the 4th dimension. It was given for discovering the exact quantization of hall resistance. 11. Bullet cluster provides evidence for the existence of dark matter(chandra.harvard.edu/graphics/resources/handouts/lithos/bullet_lithos.pdf) not for 4th dimension. We can have hours long discussion on dark matter and different theories around it but let's not go there. The kind of mathematics to do theoretical physics is different than the mathematics needed to do engineering. I am talking from experience here as I did a Ph.D. in physics and now I do research for living. For high school-level physics, we can use some algebra, calculus, and basic vector analysis. However, when we get to the kind of physics that he is trying to describe, the mathematics needed are differential geometry, tensor calculus, abstract algebra ( for exploring physics from the symmetry point of view), and much more. If anyone has taken a graduate-level General theory of relativity (which is at least a year-long course and even after that we can't claim an understanding of the theory) will agree that the first few months feel like an intro to differential geometry rather than physics. Here's a nice diagram of mathematics on which most of modern physics is built: imgur.com/a/v2w2czN . For now, I have to stop with this. Anyone, who wants to learn physics and needs guidance, please let me know. I have been at it for about 15 years and I still feel lost. All the best!
@@nirajrai9954 There are many ways to study nature. For a long time, humans have been trying to understand nature. We took different approaches to do so throughout time. Science is one of the ways to do so. Right now, modern science is one of the most rigorous ways to do so. We might discover something that someone in past has pointed out (or logically explained) and it's fine. This happens in science a lot. However, I do not agree that we are just rediscovering what someone pointed out philosophically in past. See, we are studying the same thing (i.e. nature). The means might be different (theory, experiment, or philosophy). If we do it honestly and rigorously, we find the truth (and there is one truth).
7. Then you have to redfine what a dimension means, if you apply the same meaning of dimensions for 3 ds then why not apply same definition for the 4th D? 8. This is a podcast and not a science documentary so you have a leeway to bring some silly anecdotes
Truly one of the best channel of nepal . Too much of knowledge within nepal. The Nepali comment, indepth story, you and many more are directing the youth into betterment. Thank you so much
I know we are so quick to dismising this,but someone is truly putting their effort and time to explore or challenge the exisiting theories. We shouldnt berate it or discourage. Lets encourage questioning among young people🤝.
Yes i am impressed with you but before being success giving interview about success is not good.paila prove it then come to podcast.proving his theory is important. So support wisely natra nepal lai proud hoinaa majak ko patra bananu parxa 🤣🤣
1:37:59- Elon Musk didn’t start Tesla Motors. Although he may be a fan of Tesla, he certainly didn’t come up with Tesla Inc., 2 passionate guys who had love for Nikola Tesla came up with the name!
I request Aarif to go through the lectures of Prof.Susskind with focus on the concepts of invariants. What Arif and their preprint is talking about is the Einstein's Relativity. The fourth dimension time * speed of light = spatial dimension is how Prof. Susskind bases his entire lecture on. It doesn't matter, either you call all four dimension a spatial one or temporal one or spatio-temporal one.
@Lesha Shah no. It's not about easterners or westerners. It's backing your theory with evidence or logical validity and non-contradiction. Not saying "weed smoke garda you are high, 4th is higher than 3rd, so tyo 4th dimension jasto lagcha malai." 🤦♂️
Exactly. Time can be treated as space if we multiply it by c. After all if it is a dimension of spacetime continuum, it has to be the same as the other dimensions.
This guy is a clown. He's getting even the most basic of concepts wrong and is proposing a "theory" that claims to have disproved Einstein. Inviting charlatan like these would just be sad on it own.
From Hyperspace by Michio Kaku According to the Riemann, son of a Litheran Pastor, electricity, magnetism, and gravity are caused by the crumpling of our three-dimensional universe in the unseen fourth dimension. Force has no independent life of its own; it is only the apparent effect caused by distortions of geometry. Riemann died prematurely at the age of 39 before he could complete his geometric theory of gravity, electricity, and magnetism. I like how you expressed your hypothesis, and I hope it will become an established theory one day. Best wishes for your future, and stay safe.
As he said in 46:00 , for a being to be in 4th dimension it should have 3 eyes but the confusion part is what about some creature who has like 5 or 6 eyes , for reference spider has more than 2 eyes . Do spider live in higher dimensions ?
Wow arif dai ❤ Tapai le sadhai yo book pada,yo kaam esari gara, naya idea deuu bhannnu hunthyo,sadhai inspire garnu hunxa! You are making Bhadrapur Proud dai! Best wishes🎉❤
LMAO This is what happens when us engineers get a little too romantic when it comes to physics. We all watched a little too much of of those videos by the likes of Feynman, Penrose, Susskind and we suddenly think we can come up with a ridiculous answer to everything. We all have done it, I admit it. Now Arif bro should admit it too and move on to better things in life. For example, I once "proved" when I was in my undergraduate that the universe was contracting instead of expanding. Now, I tell that anecdote to someone when they ask me to tell them a joke. 😅😆😉
though I haven't listen to this podcast I have read his paper, - first of all his postulate has no theoretical or experimental evidence/support that the total velocity of 4-D hyperbody is always constant ,c. - if that's the case the total Energy of a body is always constant which further implies a body in a motion in 3-D has less rest-mass energy, which isn't not the result form special relativity. -second: it didn't explain constant speed of light for all frame of reference. -third: according to this I could have time dilation even I reduce 4_th spatial dimension i.e for constant motion in 3-D analogous to this hypothesis - last but not least: how could changing velocity in one particular dimension affect velocity in other dimension, if its true it violate conservation of linear momentum
@@jenishadhikari6391 @jenish adhikari Its a bunch of random assumptions, elementary calculus and big ol dose of "Oh lets try to rewrite this equation in terms of that thing and come up with a new equation and call it theory". This is equivalent to kids saying "the Schrodinger's equation doesn't matter because we realized that it looks like a matrix Eigen value problem from Calc II in our undergrad". lmao
@@jenishadhikari6391 what U said goes right above my head . But after he said bunch of foolish shit like when we smoke weed,we get high and became slow because we are moving in fourth dimension 😂. I am more or less come to the same conclusion as U despite my lack of science knowledge lol.
Its Intresting when it comes to Time And Space 😍. The whole existence is Loop . And To get out of Loop and to know Creation or Super consciousness there are no other way except to go Inward.🙏
So, I went through their paper and my reaction was "wtf is this?" The paper that they published provides absolutely nothing new and even if it does its pure absurdity. They considered 4th spatial dimension and some weird postulates but the geometry of space in their paper remains exactly same as that of Minkowski space-time. The metric of 4 spatial dimensions has to be actually same as the Euclidean one (with signature (+,+,+,+) but the postulates they make brings it back to becoming the Minkowski metric. And since it follows the same metric, the 4d space has to balance itself in relation to the speed. For instance, the space should literally squeeze down to 1d for photons. And the mathematics they did, "due to proportionality" relating time and velocity makes absolutely no sense. You can't just write equations out of the blue that's not how physics work. I will get to the "Gravity in 4th spatial dimension" later. Edit: "Gravity in 4th spatial dimension" I would like to quote some sentences from the paper. "All the bodies in this universe volucelerate at a constant rate." "The curvature in space is formed due to the motion of the hyperbodies." If anyone analyze these two sentences they could find that the paper is inconsistent. Nevertheless, I will explain why this is the case. If everything in the universe volucerate at a constant rate and the curvature of space is due to the motion of hyperbodies in the 4th dimension then not everything would remain at a constant size. For instance, the speed of Earth is 30km/sec around the sun and that of sun around milky way is around 200km/s, meaning that they create different curvature (naturally) so, if the rate of voluceration is same then either the earth would have been collapsing into itself or the sun would have to be accelerating further apart or the other way around depending on the rate of voluceration(whatever that means). But, as far as I can tell, that is clearly not observed is nature. And you also do the time derivative of Volume, how does volume actually change over time? How does time come into play? Just because you call it "Voluceration" doesn't mean you just take derivative wrt time and see what follows. You see, everything has to be explained and analyzed to great detail before claiming such feat. Anyway, If anyone finds flaws in my reasoning feel free to comment and enlighten me. P.S. I am not trying to dismiss them in anyway. I really appreciate people questioning and trying to work on fundamental ideas but that doesn't mean we accept everything.
wow, someone who has some brains to figure it out. Other people in this comment section are just upright sheeps. Without understanding a shit, they just be "Proud of you" and shit. The theory with so much natural logic and reasoning that has be uphold for so many centuries can't be just dismissed by some 3 papers. So many more professional scientists might have done the research to dismiss it, but even so not been done so. I'm not demeaning this gentleman's work but just because you do some random bullshit doesn't mean you can go with the likes of Einstein.
Indeed while one of their postulate assumed Euclidean space, another postulate brings back the Minkowsky space. This is what happens when you make wild postulates in air.
12 Bajey dekhi herna lagya 2 bajisakyo aakha jhimikka pani xaina mero....kya interesting kura vairako yr🤗 la babal majja aayo arif brother...i can relate to your thoughts personally...thank you dai for this precious podcast🙏
But Einstein himself proved that If we move faster than the speed of light, we can go back in time. So theoretically , we can move back and forward in time which makes it a dimesion.
Looked at the papers, some wild assumptions have been made without proper explanation like everyone travelling @speed of light in the fourth dimension. Some basic vector equations to support this without first trying to explain why this is the case. This assumption was probably made to make the math work (basic resultant vector calculations which would only work if assumed that we are travelling at c in 4th dimension while at rest in 3rd. Not all scientists agree that 4th dimension is a temporal one instead of a spatial one. If the math would work without these crazy assumptions, it would already have been out there. It would be an easy correction. Compare Newtonian physics with relativity, it's a huge leap with answers to million questions remained unanswered by Newtonian. Also. it's stupid to say if time was the 4th dimension, we should be able to move in both forward and backward in time. Imagine the same 2D triangle in your example as falling through multiple 2D planes in 3D, being a 2D object he has no control over the 3D environment. Similarly, we might be falling through different time planes in one direction which we can't control whatsoever. P.S.: Being a Mechanical Engineer, I believe engineers are good at applying physics not recreating it. Bro is walking on thin ice with this theory, which if correct for some wild reason is a minute correction to the existing one. Please don't refer to him as a physicist but as an engineer.
I am an absolute believer of law of attraction. I’m doing this 3-6-9 for one of my dreams starting from tonight. Universe understands only the vibrational frequency. So writing what we wanna live, universal force works to make our dream come true. I’m absolutely stunned hearing Arif Ali. He is one of a kind born in this century, I can reckon. 🤍🤍🤍🤍 The secret only works (Result/Dream) = thought( feel creating that frequency; the only language of universe)+ action
You get all answers in spirituality. Please get depth in spirituality. Basically spirituality is about mastering yourself. Dont think yourself as separate being in universe. We are also the part of this universe. So if we can dive into ourselves in meditation we can get all answers. The question is how much you be aware of all. Those all scriptures are written by exploring all dimensions of own human body. Lets rock!!
Every motion requires energy ; force; 1.what force cause the motion of bodies in hyper space at c?? 2. What happens to the motion of light at hyper space 4d , if the resultant motion must be the speed of light? We also know matter requires infinite energy to go in the motion of light.
Absolutely beautiful contain it changed the way how I observe everything and it's my second time that I have comment on your channel. Keep doing your work wish you a good times
The way he talks about Hindu sculptures and Bhagavad Gita despite being Muslim is just wow, My fav line "everyone should read Vedas removing all the religious aspects" This is joe rogan level
@@thema9ish1 Little knowledge is dangerous Specially in the context of our community. Mr Physicist himself knowing much about Hinduism despite being a muslim is a big question on his intent specially in the context of Vedas, Who taught him vedas ? Did he self read em ? Online classes ? If he understood those verses, doubtful if they'd still be so sold on their religion.
What is it with engineers, and why is it that anytime there is some nonsense involving quantum physics or relativity, it is always THEM? "In the first paper in the introduction, they misrepresent a random grab-bag of famous experiments from Physics to give themselves some legitimacy. Michaelson-Morley was about the isotropy of the speed of light in the sense that they showed there was no drag force. The Quantum Hall effect corresponds to 2D materials, nothing to do with 4D as far as I know. They don't state it anywhere, but they effectively say between equations (2) and (3) that "let's assume everything moves at c in four dimensions always". It's an interesting suggestion, because you get this Lorentz factor out. But then they go on to say something like "by the postulate, the time is proportional to the speed in the fourth dimension" or something. They never introduced or justified a postulate as far as I can see. And also, if local time is the same as local 4th dimension speed, why not just use local time in the first place? It doesn't matter what you call it. In fact, I get the feeling that what they are trying to state with interpretation is well known, I think its equivalent to using the Minkowski metric. They say that they don't rely on a universal speed of light. But they have already said "everything moves at the speed of light through 4D". That seems pretty universal to me. In this second paper they talk about deriving GR from this postulate or something? But at the very most what they will be doing is rewriting GR in terms of their language/notation. There are already strong geometric interpretations of GR. It seems unlikely that this viewpoint will make some major breakthrough by renaming time. From the first paper, it seems like they are saying "if we call time a velocity, then we can derive everything in terms of velocity!". Well, yes. But nothing new has been gained. Certainly, they have not removed the universal speed of light. You can't use the unuversal speed of light to define this speed, and then claim it is not universal. It's circular logic. It looks like they've set up a system that they've not justified, done some simple vector calculation, and then made a claim about that vector calculation that is similarly unjustified. There is no Physics there. Always be cynical. Especially of big claims. If they are true, they will hold up to rigorous challenging. In general, big claims require big evidence, and at the very least, peer review in a good journal. Most people who make claims like this aren't interested in understanding why they have not passed peer review, they believe so strongly in what they've written, they won't take any criticism. Often they will try to promote their work through other, less rigorous means. And this ego trap seems easy to fall into, check out ViXrA if you want to see people who have not succeeded in breaking the mainstream with their "revolutionary theories". It's easy to spend your life reading and critically evaluating why these types of papers are not correct, but it is a waste of time normally. Often, these sorts of papers are "not even wrong", and there is not a lot to be gained by reading them. As you read more papers, or study more physics, you gain an intuition for how these papers feel. There are major and minor red flags, like making claims about other results that are not true, or incorrectly using standard jargon, obfuscating maths behind needlessly complicated notation, or a whole number of other things that makes it "feel" incorrect. There is a term for it that I can't remember, it's something to do with not being part of a shared sociolect,.that you would have naturally acquired through reading the necessary prerequisites to be an expert in the field. Just like a sommelier knows when someone is making stuff up by the language they use, so too do physicists know when someone's not read many papers or textbooks." - U/QuargRanger
You are also making lots of assumptions here. However, I agree with your comment in general. Well done taking this much time to explain something properly and thoroughly. 👏
It's dunning kruger effect the term you can't remember. This guy is pure joke to the scientific community or new generation of thinkers so to speak. The way he referred his theory as "Theory of everything" is just red flag. He is just trying to get some FAME for bullshit theories( it's not even a theory ). And also this guy doesn't understand causation and correlation. The weed correlation to 4th dimension was just...... i quit
Lately I'm interested in your channel. Thank you for inviting such talents especially young people with hidden talents. People can educate themselves watching your videos. I did. Keep doing it brother. much love✌🤟
The reason why human minds always think of a thing which when asked not supposed to be thinking is only because, it’s effortless, where in to do something good/positive takes lot of effort in the mind as a level of existence of life.
Searched for it, he has a paper on Time dilation in fourth spatial direction.. I may be opinionated but his co-author is someone from MBA background and he has a paper of 3 pages with a simple basic equations of vector and merely 13 references… Idk this is our of my expertise but at first glance on his paper, it looks like a joke !!!!
Engineering garera MBA garnu vaneko job ko lagi ho bro not for the knowledge. This is a trend among graduates because of the demand. If it's a joke then they will get that sort of response from the experts. Physicists are most cynical when reading other people's work.
exactly. this is bullshit. people are being fooled; and the host doesn't know shit. this is why it people should start reading better books from an early age.
@@subashchapagain341 being a skeptical and completely dismissing someone is two different things. Maybe the papers they wrote aren't valid but to completely shut them down is not the right attitude. How many physicists from Nepal have tried to write something of their own? They get their degree and start living a cosy life. We need people to do their own research and write papers and journals.
@@nihilsticgooner I see in many comments that you are supporting this guy. First of all many Nepalease have published research articles, he is not the first one to attempt it. Second for any hypothesis to be accepted as theory or fact it has to be experimentally proven. That is the reason why Hawking never got noble prize because his predictions has not been proved. Third, he paints a picture of different sort of universe and with extremely simple mathematics comes up with established equations. This sort of things we used to do in exam, when we could not recall the derivation. Fourth, His motivation as to why he approach this weird picture has not been explained properly. Only things he has said in the podcast and in 'paper' is that the current method is difficult. Dont support pseudoscience is all I want to say. people spend their life to such work and this guy is basically mocking them all.
Hello dai tapai ko concept kasto interesting xa. Maile yo video hera malai pani yeauta kasto question ayo. Jastai naya dimension banna lai 0 dimension dot. bata suru hunxa hai vanesi hami nai 4th dimension ho or hami 4 th dimension ho. Like maile socheko hami transparent vaye hami 4th dimentional ho.
1:26:00 speed of light is always constant. doesn't mean light will hit you simultaneously if you are in motion or at rest. It will hit the observer who is moving towards it first. correct me if I am wrong.
He is a bit confused here, hamile sangai vetne haina light lai but if we measure we will find the speed of light to be the same, which should not have been the case according to classical physics
It needs to be noted that the paper is a preprint and hasn't yet been peer-reviewed. Would advise the author to publish this in a significant impact factor physics journal where the true cruxes of his postulated claims would find real ground/challenges/rebuttals amidst an international community of research scientists/reviewers. A pre-print no matter how many times read, or downloaded if not peer-reviewed holds low validation. It is a better way to make better science.
Jaba suru bata herdai gaiyo teti nai jhan bhanda jhan curious kura haru aauney thale ..sayad yo nai maile hereko pahilo podcast hola jun maile katti pani skip nagari antim samma herey.. Dherai nai informative chha ....
45:40 The perception of viewing 3 dimensions in human beings is not exactly because of 2 eyes (Yes, I agree having two eyes makes one able to perceive depth more accurately) but don't forget the fact that you can have the perception of 3 dimensions by closing your one eye while opening the other. Actually we are seeing things in 2 dimensions, the reason we see things in 3 dimensions is due to the variance of light and shadows (Lighting plays an important role in our perception of 3 dimensional space) and the fact that an object closer to eye appears larger while an object farther appears smaller. Object that moves quickly through the field of view of our eye are perceived as being closer. (Same applies for one eyed man and even video cameras too). Individuals with one eye may have a reduced ability to estimate depth accurately, but come on man, they can perceive the 3 dimensional space too! The way you said having 3 eyes makes one able to see 4th dimension, that means a hypothetical machine with 3 cameras can see the 4th dimension wtf!, anyways loved your explanations ❤
Yes you have a good point . We also have a higher dimension being inside us we call 'spirit' or soul This helps us in preception and understanding of the world.
I feel like I am listening to Sri Nitya Pragya JI. Arif Ali seems spiritual 😅😅 How can this be possible, Physics Student Talk Spiritual. i Belive He will Rock The science. 🥰😇
Do you think writing theory is majak? Do you think physics is joke? At first the guy with civil engineering degree and M.B.A degree can never be physicist. Because to be physicist you need to solve lots and lots of problem, you need to have solid grasp on mathematics and mathematical skills can't be aced within month. It takes years. As he is civil engineer with master in structural engineering, One can easily predict how less time he has to think about physics problem and developing physicist mindset. He is too child to be physicist. Some of you might argue that Einstein and Newton was also young. At first please don't compare them with him. Furthermore, Einstein was proper physics graduate. Talking about Schrödinger writing paper while he was around ladies, yes Schrödinger was ladies man, he was seductive guy. But this doesn't mean he didn't study at all. Scientists and physicist spend their life time solving problem with consistency. Intuition is result of repetition not some supernatural ability. So, my kindly request to production is to bring some hard core physicist. Not some random engineer who claimed to be physicist. Stop spreading misinformation.
Why do you have to channel your inner Nepali foolishness? It's easy to pull the legs of someone. I am just asking you to do your research before spewing nonsense on someone.
@@nihilsticgooner The mathematics of structural engineering is completely different from mathematics of relativity and physics. If mathematics is all you need, the C.S students le physics ko paper lekhi vaigoni tw. You are acting like a fool actually.
@@nihilsticgooner It seems He does not understand tensor calculus. I doubt he understand any mathematics involved in theory of relativity. Talking about structural engineer doing math, i doubt they go beyond vector calculus.
41:25 Electrons are Lepton and not Hadrons. Neutron and Proton are Hadrons but an Electron is a Lepton like muon and tau partciles. Mesons such as Pions and Kaons and Baryons like Neutron and Proton falls under Hadron. Whereas, Electron is a Lepton that falls under Fermions category!
This guy actually said when we take ganja and got high we tend to become slow because we are travelling at 4th dimension 😅. I was actually laughing out loud, I am surprised he didn't laugh out 😂
Voluceration is not a new concept. You should also explain why things expand continuously to cause voluceration. Also, explain why the sum of speed of 4th dimension object and its 3rd dimension counter object must be at the speed of light.
@@lujarajbhandari612 C mai aaera kina constant hunxa vaneko ? hera to be honest yo explain garne manxe le nai vague and obscure kura gare jasto laagyo malai..maile usko kura jati bujhe teti maile vane.. C ma constant hunu vaneko ta last ma Einstein sangai agree gare jasto dekinxa..kinaki no speed is greater than C in this universe as said by Einstein..yo C maa aaera constant hunxa vanera usle kina vaneko vanda, usle ta 4th dimension ma C ko speed ma move garxa objects haru vanyo ni ta, ho yo usko premise ho. aba afno premse lai warrant garna; sahi saabit garna usle teso vaneko hunu parxa..kinaki uslai pani thaha xa Einstein ko aru kura challenge gare pani C bhanda maathi jaana nasakine kura lai ta challenge garnai sakinna vanera..tesaile usle euta kura lai afno premise banayo ki C bhand maathi gayo bhane mero theory fail khanxa tesaile usle C mai constant hunxa bhandeko, jotko ma..aba usko yo 4th dimension ma objects C kai speed ma move garxa vanne kura chahi usko premise ho..yo first argument lai usle sahi maanera aghi badheko xa. ma ta yo premise lai nai question garxu..usle C bahek aru kunai speed dekhe na ? aru speed kina huna sakdaina? khoi yo keto k kura garxa garxa..scientific kura ma "instinct' vanne word ta use garna hudaina tara pani mero instinct le malai ta yo manxe ko kura ma dherai loopholes haru xa vanxa..i dont think he will succeed, seriously. kinaki ma science/engineering ko student thiye and i still am, tara spirituality ma mero dherai dakkhal chha. ra yaha usle spirituality lai ghusaauna khojyo tyo ekdum thik laagena malai..totally crap..science kai kura ma stick bhaako bhae ramro hunthyo.. the moment he started talking of spiritual books he got exposed, atleast for me..ra euta kura ma pani jote ko maile thaha pae bhane feri ma uslai pattyauna sakdina aru kura ma pani.usle aru dherai thauma jote ko chha, ma confirmed xu esma..
Ho vai ek choti gaja Khako 4th dimension ma pugdira bau ko duee laat khaye paxhi feri 3 dimension ma farkiye.. experience was worth it bro..yo podcast ma aauda ne bro 4th dimension Mai Cha jasto cha ganja khayera
maile padde but has many drawbacks - first of all his postulate has no theoretical or experimental evidence/support that the total velocity of 4-D hyperbody is always constant. - if that's the case the total Energy of a body is always constant which further implies a body in a motion in 3-D has less rest-mass energy, which isn't not the result form special relativity. -second: it didn't explain constant speed of light for all frame of reference. -third: according to this I could have time dilation even I reduce 4_th spatial dimension i.e for constant motion in 3-D analogous to this hypothesis - last but not least: how could changing velocity in one particular dimension affect velocity in other dimension, if its true it violate conservation of linear momentum
We will find gems as we go deeper in this podcast 😂. This guy said We can see two dimensions because we have two eye . Lord shiva has three eye so he can see Third dimension 😂.I wonder how many dimensions housefly can see lol
This one podcast has ruined the credibility of the channel. This guy has a degree in struc engg and claims to challenge gtr. Nothing sounds more funny 😂😂
Testo bhaneko xaena...2 ota aakha le chai 3D views dekhinxa bhaneko ho .. Try gara euta aakha chimlera hera kunai pani object lai...kati tadha cha bhanera mind le calculate garna nai sakdaina...
@@shishirbhusal7956 broo his co-author is someone with a degree in MBA and they have a paper of 3 pages on time dilation in d4th spatial dimensions and the mathematics you see there is not even plus 2 level 🤣🤣
Sushant bro, what an episode yaar! Honestly, get English sub for this video to get it globally understood. Whatever he is saying makes a lot of sense. You got one more subscriber❤
everything volucerates at speed of light..say this your theory is complete..if u say so" u can say that all photon are still.. and because of our implicit light speed, we still see it moving at light speed"..this should solve all controversies..
This man is talkin’ real shit bruh If you’re slow then you can’t get his physics He is synchronizing every fuckin existed hypothesis I’m glad that i could synchronize all his time dilation concept of each human
Bro time is not watch time is about atoms how they react we all made of atoms so if u move speed of light ur body atoms will react slowly so ur age will not increase fast 😊
For any serious science enthusiasts/students, please take the science in this podcast with a grain of salt. This podcast is filled with misleading science and inconsistencies.
For the sake of science, I had to comment on this video. I really admire the very thoughtful comments by some viewers. People have already pointed out many flaws in the paper as well as the podcast. Kudos to Arif for thinking about some of the most fundamental problems in physics. Arif, if you are really serious about physics, I highly recommend you take some serious physics and mathematics courses. If you want people to consider you seriously, please do not present some half-baked ideas sprinkled with some religious/spiritual BS. Science is a serious profession. Science has to be lucid, not vague. It has to be explanatory, predictive, and verifiable. Also, science can't be based on metaphors and speculations. Please leave BS science mixed with religious stuff to gurus. They are doing a good job of it already.
If I go on to point out the flaws in the whole podcast then it will be a very long post. Anyway, let's jot down some general feedback:
1. String theory (ST) is not an alternative to GR. It's a mathematical way to explain quantum gravity.
2. Even though string theory is mostly a mathematical construct, it does predict things. LHC is trying to test predictions: tinyurl.com/2s374fnx
4. Black hole is a prediction of GR. In physics, there are many ways to observe things (it doesn't always have to be a picture). The first black hole was identified in 1971.
5. For a theory to be good, it has to explain the existing observations and make predictions. For instance, GR wasn't considered a serious theory until its prediction was verified in experiments /observations (tinyurl.com/cd33hjwp / en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tests_of_general_relativity)
6. GR is a solid theory (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tests_of_general_relativity). Any seasoned physicist wouldn't doubt it. It works at many different distance scales but it fails at the quantum scale. And, I think it's fine because GR is geometric theory and it's not easy to understand geometry at that quantum scale. For example, is spacetime discrete or continuous? At large scale spacetime is continuous and you can use differential geometry to study spacetime (which is what GR does).
7. The whole premise of why time cannot be a dimension just on the wrong assumption that we can't travel back in time is wrong.
8. This whole obsession with 4 and trying to connect that 4 to science is pure nonsense. Even trying to associate "high" and slowness after smoking weed with a higher dimension shows how immature this podcast is. This is called pseudo-science.
9. The explanation of matter-antimatter asymmetry problem is wrong. I am pretty sure anyone who has taken basic particle physics must have noticed the inconsistencies. Most of the time, when people cannot explain something they invoke god. A scientist would never do that. He/she would always accept that I do not understand it. This means I need to reinvestigate and try to come up with something better.
10. Nobel prize for the quantum hall effect wasn't given for proving the existence of the 4th dimension. It was given for discovering the exact quantization of hall resistance.
11. Bullet cluster provides evidence for the existence of dark matter(chandra.harvard.edu/graphics/resources/handouts/lithos/bullet_lithos.pdf) not for 4th dimension. We can have hours long discussion on dark matter and different theories around it but let's not go there.
The kind of mathematics to do theoretical physics is different than the mathematics needed to do engineering. I am talking from experience here as I did a Ph.D. in physics and now I do research for living. For high school-level physics, we can use some algebra, calculus, and basic vector analysis. However, when we get to the kind of physics that he is trying to describe, the mathematics needed are differential geometry, tensor calculus, abstract algebra ( for exploring physics from the symmetry point of view), and much more. If anyone has taken a graduate-level General theory of relativity (which is at least a year-long course and even after that we can't claim an understanding of the theory) will agree that the first few months feel like an intro to differential geometry rather than physics. Here's a nice diagram of mathematics on which most of modern physics is built: imgur.com/a/v2w2czN .
For now, I have to stop with this. Anyone, who wants to learn physics and needs guidance, please let me know. I have been at it for about 15 years and I still feel lost.
All the best!
You nailed it But
i would like to ask aren't scientist's new discoveries are just predisoveries of ancestors phylosophy , beliefs.
@@nirajrai9954 There are many ways to study nature. For a long time, humans have been trying to understand nature. We took different approaches to do so throughout time. Science is one of the ways to do so. Right now, modern science is one of the most rigorous ways to do so. We might discover something that someone in past has pointed out (or logically explained) and it's fine. This happens in science a lot. However, I do not agree that we are just rediscovering what someone pointed out philosophically in past.
See, we are studying the same thing (i.e. nature). The means might be different (theory, experiment, or philosophy). If we do it honestly and rigorously, we find the truth (and there is one truth).
Yep, Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Metaphysics is not Science.
7. Then you have to redfine what a dimension means, if you apply the same meaning of dimensions for 3 ds then why not apply same definition for the 4th D?
8. This is a podcast and not a science documentary so you have a leeway to bring some silly anecdotes
Wow I read your entire comment and man o man you just nailed it. Thank you for saving my 2 hours.
Truly one of the best channel of nepal . Too much of knowledge within nepal. The Nepali comment, indepth story, you and many more are directing the youth into betterment. Thank you so much
I know we are so quick to dismising this,but someone is truly putting their effort and time to explore or challenge the exisiting theories. We shouldnt berate it or discourage. Lets encourage questioning among young people🤝.
Yes i am impressed with you but before being success giving interview about success is not good.paila prove it then come to podcast.proving his theory is important. So support wisely natra nepal lai proud hoinaa majak ko patra bananu parxa 🤣🤣
@@hahaha5704 🤣🤣. Tyo pani ho hai,but at least start ta hudeixa.
@@hahaha5704 natra para bijaya shahi jastai hunxa
@@aashisht05 exactly bro 🤣🤣🤣
Exactly!!
To think of it and analysis and hence question it is itself appreciable.
1:37:59- Elon Musk didn’t start Tesla Motors. Although he may be a fan of Tesla, he certainly didn’t come up with Tesla Inc., 2 passionate guys who had love for Nikola Tesla came up with the name!
I request Aarif to go through the lectures of Prof.Susskind with focus on the concepts of invariants. What Arif and their preprint is talking about is the Einstein's Relativity. The fourth dimension time * speed of light = spatial dimension is how Prof. Susskind bases his entire lecture on. It doesn't matter, either you call all four dimension a spatial one or temporal one or spatio-temporal one.
tei bhanya haha this is delusion. the guys should definitely listen to Sabine Hossenfelder as well.
@Lesha Shah no. It's not about easterners or westerners. It's backing your theory with evidence or logical validity and non-contradiction. Not saying "weed smoke garda you are high, 4th is higher than 3rd, so tyo 4th dimension jasto lagcha malai."
🤦♂️
8😂uj6jyyg🎉
Exactly. Time can be treated as space if we multiply it by c. After all if it is a dimension of spacetime continuum, it has to be the same as the other dimensions.
So I took the liberty of sitting through this painful 2 and half hours podcast and seems like we found our own Deepak Chopra here in Nepal.
yes fuck yessssssss
Whats ur major
The co author of his theory is a MBA grad from Kathmandu University. Then i was done.
I couldn't watch it after he said that he feel like god is helping him.
Best video in the internet, This video has been a lullaby for me, my mind tends to fall asleep quickly instead of hearing all this
This is what we want dai, we want more like this
There are several physics enthusiasts we want all of them...
sushant bro does not care what we want. He brings the people with whom he wants to talk.
This guy is a clown. He's getting even the most basic of concepts wrong and is proposing a "theory" that claims to have disproved Einstein. Inviting charlatan like these would just be sad on it own.
lol nooo. this is the most stupid shit to ever exist.
he has brought a narcissistic this time.
From Hyperspace by Michio Kaku
According to the Riemann, son of a Litheran Pastor, electricity, magnetism, and gravity are caused by the crumpling of our three-dimensional universe in the unseen fourth dimension. Force has no independent life of its own; it is only the apparent effect caused by distortions of geometry. Riemann died prematurely at the age of 39 before he could complete his geometric theory of gravity, electricity, and magnetism.
I like how you expressed your hypothesis, and I hope it will become an established theory one day. Best wishes for your future, and stay safe.
As he said in 46:00 , for a being to be in 4th dimension it should have 3 eyes but the confusion part is what about some creature who has like 5 or 6 eyes , for reference spider has more than 2 eyes . Do spider live in higher dimensions ?
haha u just debunked him..No it doesnt mean spiders live in higher dimensions, it simply means he is making chutiya out of himself..lol
Complete bs. People with one eye still can see 3 dimensions. You don't need two eyes to compile 3 Dimensions.
Nice one😂
Yei interview euta arkai top nepalko physicist lai pani rakhera garna paye maja hunthyo ki! Looking forward.. bell on garey hai tah
Wow arif dai ❤ Tapai le sadhai yo book pada,yo kaam esari gara, naya idea deuu bhannnu hunthyo,sadhai inspire garnu hunxa! You are making Bhadrapur Proud dai! Best wishes🎉❤
Yo ladoo haru chutiya banauna khojdaee cha . Khoi white paper khoi peer review. ladoo jastoo religious text ko badnaam gardaee cha.
Feels genuine ❤️❤️❤️❤️
I'm going to study your paperwork ...
Please bring actual expert in those subjects please
LMAO This is what happens when us engineers get a little too romantic when it comes to physics. We all watched a little too much of of those videos by the likes of Feynman, Penrose, Susskind and we suddenly think we can come up with a ridiculous answer to everything. We all have done it, I admit it. Now Arif bro should admit it too and move on to better things in life. For example, I once "proved" when I was in my undergraduate that the universe was contracting instead of expanding. Now, I tell that anecdote to someone when they ask me to tell them a joke. 😅😆😉
though I haven't listen to this podcast I have read his paper,
- first of all his postulate has no theoretical or experimental evidence/support that the total velocity of 4-D hyperbody is always constant ,c.
- if that's the case the total Energy of a body is always constant which further implies a body in a motion in 3-D has less rest-mass energy, which isn't not the result form special relativity.
-second: it didn't explain constant speed of light for all frame of reference.
-third: according to this I could have time dilation even I reduce 4_th spatial dimension i.e for constant motion in 3-D analogous to this hypothesis
- last but not least: how could changing velocity in one particular dimension affect velocity in other dimension, if its true it violate conservation of linear momentum
@@jenishadhikari6391 @jenish adhikari Its a bunch of random assumptions, elementary calculus and big ol dose of "Oh lets try to rewrite this equation in terms of that thing and come up with a new equation and call it theory". This is equivalent to kids saying "the Schrodinger's equation doesn't matter because we realized that it looks like a matrix Eigen value problem from Calc II in our undergrad". lmao
@@jenishadhikari6391 what U said goes right above my head . But after he said bunch of foolish shit like when we smoke weed,we get high and became slow because we are moving in fourth dimension 😂. I am more or less come to the same conclusion as U despite my lack of science knowledge lol.
@@nowwhat6716 whats your major again?
I have done that too.. but it can't be ignored.
Its Intresting when it comes to Time And Space 😍. The whole existence is Loop . And To get out of Loop and to know Creation or Super consciousness there are no other way except to go Inward.🙏
So, I went through their paper and my reaction was "wtf is this?" The paper that they published provides absolutely nothing new and even if it does its pure absurdity.
They considered 4th spatial dimension and some weird postulates but the geometry of space in their paper remains exactly same as that of Minkowski space-time. The metric of 4 spatial dimensions has to be actually same as the Euclidean one (with signature (+,+,+,+) but the postulates they make brings it back to becoming the Minkowski metric. And since it follows the same metric, the 4d space has to balance itself in relation to the speed. For instance, the space should literally squeeze down to 1d for photons. And the mathematics they did, "due to proportionality" relating time and velocity makes absolutely no sense. You can't just write equations out of the blue that's not how physics work.
I will get to the "Gravity in 4th spatial dimension" later.
Edit: "Gravity in 4th spatial dimension"
I would like to quote some sentences from the paper. "All the bodies in this universe volucelerate at a constant rate." "The curvature in space is formed due to the motion of the hyperbodies." If anyone analyze these two sentences they could find that the paper is inconsistent. Nevertheless, I will explain why this is the case. If everything in the universe volucerate at a constant rate and the curvature of space is due to the motion of hyperbodies in the 4th dimension then not everything would remain at a constant size. For instance, the speed of Earth is 30km/sec around the sun and that of sun around milky way is around 200km/s, meaning that they create different curvature (naturally) so, if the rate of voluceration is same then either the earth would have been collapsing into itself or the sun would have to be accelerating further apart or the other way around depending on the rate of voluceration(whatever that means). But, as far as I can tell, that is clearly not observed is nature.
And you also do the time derivative of Volume, how does volume actually change over time? How does time come into play? Just because you call it "Voluceration" doesn't mean you just take derivative wrt time and see what follows. You see, everything has to be explained and analyzed to great detail before claiming such feat.
Anyway, If anyone finds flaws in my reasoning feel free to comment and enlighten me.
P.S. I am not trying to dismiss them in anyway. I really appreciate people questioning and trying to work on fundamental ideas but that doesn't mean we accept everything.
wow, someone who has some brains to figure it out. Other people in this comment section are just upright sheeps. Without understanding a shit, they just be "Proud of you" and shit. The theory with so much natural logic and reasoning that has be uphold for so many centuries can't be just dismissed by some 3 papers. So many more professional scientists might have done the research to dismiss it, but even so not been done so. I'm not demeaning this gentleman's work but just because you do some random bullshit doesn't mean you can go with the likes of Einstein.
Yo ladoo haru chutiya banauna khojdaee cha bro. Khoi white paper khoi per review. ladoo jastoo religious text ko badnaam gardaee cha.
Indeed while one of their postulate assumed Euclidean space, another postulate brings back the Minkowsky space. This is what happens when you make wild postulates in air.
@@ayushparajuli1330 Where can we find their paper? Leads to their link, please.
@@cfdspace6866google open science framework and search for their submission "time dilation in fourth dimension".
Einstein le katai vanekaaxan ki "ma vabissemaa kasaile mero theory lai galat proof garos or challenge garosh vanne chahanxu " love you sir .
Sushant dai I am first time here in your podcast. Thank you so much. His message lastly is very inspiring.
It feels like another successful person as rishi damala said 😂. Let's not get fooled
I wish him great success to prove his theory. I know he can do it.
Yo ladoo haru chutiya banauna khojdaee cha bro. Khoi white paper khoi per review. ladoo jastoo religious text ko badnaam gardaee cha.
😂lol
Hmmm. Interesting concept. 👌. Would love to more about hyperbody and fuid space. Next podcast more detail about it bro. 🙏
noble peace prize hoina Sushant bhai, noble prize for physics po ho ta 😄
0:46 Nobel Peace Prize hoina ni, Nobel Prize in Physics ho.
IT, Internet Security, IOT, Programming Bare one of the experts like Arif Ali, kaslai lai bolounu vayo vane pani ramro hunthyo.
12 Bajey dekhi herna lagya 2 bajisakyo aakha jhimikka pani xaina mero....kya interesting kura vairako yr🤗 la babal majja aayo arif brother...i can relate to your thoughts personally...thank you dai for this precious podcast🙏
Suru ma heray video k rahecha vanayera ek chin sunayera skip garaula vanayera but jattti suney jhan jhan sunna maan lagyo.
But Einstein himself proved that If we move faster than the speed of light, we can go back in time. So theoretically , we can move back and forward in time which makes it a dimesion.
Such a wholesome podcast❤. Thanks for this
Looked at the papers, some wild assumptions have been made without proper explanation like everyone travelling @speed of light in the fourth dimension. Some basic vector equations to support this without first trying to explain why this is the case. This assumption was probably made to make the math work (basic resultant vector calculations which would only work if assumed that we are travelling at c in 4th dimension while at rest in 3rd.
Not all scientists agree that 4th dimension is a temporal one instead of a spatial one. If the math would work without these crazy assumptions, it would already have been out there. It would be an easy correction. Compare Newtonian physics with relativity, it's a huge leap with answers to million questions remained unanswered by Newtonian.
Also. it's stupid to say if time was the 4th dimension, we should be able to move in both forward and backward in time. Imagine the same 2D triangle in your example as falling through multiple 2D planes in 3D, being a 2D object he has no control over the 3D environment. Similarly, we might be falling through different time planes in one direction which we can't control whatsoever.
P.S.: Being a Mechanical Engineer, I believe engineers are good at applying physics not recreating it. Bro is walking on thin ice with this theory, which if correct for some wild reason is a minute correction to the existing one. Please don't refer to him as a physicist but as an engineer.
So lovely conversation between two lovely guys❤
Source:TRUST ME BRO.
I am an absolute believer of law of attraction. I’m doing this 3-6-9 for one of my dreams starting from tonight. Universe understands only the vibrational frequency. So writing what we wanna live, universal force works to make our dream come true. I’m absolutely stunned hearing Arif Ali. He is one of a kind born in this century, I can reckon. 🤍🤍🤍🤍
The secret only works (Result/Dream) = thought( feel creating that frequency; the only language of universe)+ action
I haven't listened yet but i know this ep gonna be litt 🔥
You get all answers in spirituality. Please get depth in spirituality. Basically spirituality is about mastering yourself. Dont think yourself as separate being in universe. We are also the part of this universe. So if we can dive into ourselves in meditation we can get all answers. The question is how much you be aware of all. Those all scriptures are written by exploring all dimensions of own human body. Lets rock!!
Science physics like podcast I want more
Bro this podcast is made for me ☺️😌☺️
Every motion requires energy ; force;
1.what force cause the motion of bodies in hyper space at c??
2. What happens to the motion of light at hyper space 4d , if the resultant motion must be the speed of light?
We also know matter requires infinite energy to go in the motion of light.
You are making Bhadrapur proud Daju! Love from your hometown ❤️
Yo ladoo haru chutiya banauna khojdaee cha bro. Khoi white paper khoi per review. ladoo jastoo religious text ko badnaam gardaee cha.
Absolutely beautiful contain it changed the way how I observe everything and it's my second time that I have comment on your channel. Keep doing your work wish you a good times
Inspiring, I will read your paper what is there,wish you best of luck.
broooooooooooooo 369 powerful number of universe aani last podcast of sushant was also 69 about science and this also 99 . what! seriouslyyyyyyyyyyyyy
was it planned??? its 🤯
The way he talks about Hindu sculptures and Bhagavad Gita despite being Muslim is just wow,
My fav line "everyone should read Vedas removing all the religious aspects"
This is joe rogan level
Out of the context
That's like saying everyone should read upon the equations and explantions of Newton on relativity
@@flowstate8991 how bruh?
@@binaydhawa7666 ?? U didn't get my point bruh
@@thema9ish1
Little knowledge is dangerous
Specially in the context of our community.
Mr Physicist himself knowing much about Hinduism despite being a muslim is a big question on his intent specially in the context of Vedas,
Who taught him vedas ?
Did he self read em ?
Online classes ?
If he understood those verses, doubtful if they'd still be so sold on their religion.
What is it with engineers, and why is it that anytime there is some nonsense involving quantum physics or relativity, it is always THEM?
"In the first paper in the introduction, they misrepresent a random grab-bag of famous experiments from Physics to give themselves some legitimacy. Michaelson-Morley was about the isotropy of the speed of light in the sense that they showed there was no drag force. The Quantum Hall effect corresponds to 2D materials, nothing to do with 4D as far as I know.
They don't state it anywhere, but they effectively say between equations (2) and (3) that "let's assume everything moves at c in four dimensions always". It's an interesting suggestion, because you get this Lorentz factor out.
But then they go on to say something like "by the postulate, the time is proportional to the speed in the fourth dimension" or something. They never introduced or justified a postulate as far as I can see. And also, if local time is the same as local 4th dimension speed, why not just use local time in the first place? It doesn't matter what you call it. In fact, I get the feeling that what they are trying to state with interpretation is well known, I think its equivalent to using the Minkowski metric.
They say that they don't rely on a universal speed of light. But they have already said "everything moves at the speed of light through 4D". That seems pretty universal to me.
In this second paper they talk about deriving GR from this postulate or something? But at the very most what they will be doing is rewriting GR in terms of their language/notation. There are already strong geometric interpretations of GR. It seems unlikely that this viewpoint will make some major breakthrough by renaming time.
From the first paper, it seems like they are saying "if we call time a velocity, then we can derive everything in terms of velocity!". Well, yes. But nothing new has been gained. Certainly, they have not removed the universal speed of light. You can't use the unuversal speed of light to define this speed, and then claim it is not universal. It's circular logic. It looks like they've set up a system that they've not justified, done some simple vector calculation, and then made a claim about that vector calculation that is similarly unjustified. There is no Physics there.
Always be cynical. Especially of big claims. If they are true, they will hold up to rigorous challenging.
In general, big claims require big evidence, and at the very least, peer review in a good journal. Most people who make claims like this aren't interested in understanding why they have not passed peer review, they believe so strongly in what they've written, they won't take any criticism. Often they will try to promote their work through other, less rigorous means. And this ego trap seems easy to fall into, check out ViXrA if you want to see people who have not succeeded in breaking the mainstream with their "revolutionary theories". It's easy to spend your life reading and critically evaluating why these types of papers are not correct, but it is a waste of time normally. Often, these sorts of papers are "not even wrong", and there is not a lot to be gained by reading them. As you read more papers, or study more physics, you gain an intuition for how these papers feel. There are major and minor red flags, like making claims about other results that are not true, or incorrectly using standard jargon, obfuscating maths behind needlessly complicated notation, or a whole number of other things that makes it "feel" incorrect. There is a term for it that I can't remember, it's something to do with not being part of a shared sociolect,.that you would have naturally acquired through reading the necessary prerequisites to be an expert in the field. Just like a sommelier knows when someone is making stuff up by the language they use, so too do physicists know when someone's not read many papers or textbooks."
- U/QuargRanger
You are also making lots of assumptions here. However, I agree with your comment in general. Well done taking this much time to explain something properly and thoroughly. 👏
It's dunning kruger effect the term you can't remember. This guy is pure joke to the scientific community or new generation of thinkers so to speak. The way he referred his theory as "Theory of everything" is just red flag. He is just trying to get some FAME for bullshit theories( it's not even a theory ). And also this guy doesn't understand causation and correlation.
The weed correlation to 4th dimension was just...... i quit
I was writing a lengthy comment and saw yours. I am so angry after this podcast that I wnt to slap him
looks like another masterpiece ..
honey bee has 6 eyes that means honey bee lives in 7th dimension
Now I’m asking to myself.. Why did I listened to this podcast!! 😢
Lately I'm interested in your channel. Thank you for inviting such talents especially young people with hidden talents. People can educate themselves watching your videos. I did. Keep doing it brother. much love✌🤟
The reason why human minds always think of a thing which when asked not supposed to be thinking is only because, it’s effortless, where in to do something good/positive takes lot of effort in the mind as a level of existence of life.
Source: Trust me bro.
Searched for it, he has a paper on Time dilation in fourth spatial direction.. I may be opinionated but his co-author is someone from MBA background and he has a paper of 3 pages with a simple basic equations of vector and merely 13 references… Idk this is our of my expertise but at first glance on his paper, it looks like a joke !!!!
Engineering garera MBA garnu vaneko job ko lagi ho bro not for the knowledge. This is a trend among graduates because of the demand. If it's a joke then they will get that sort of response from the experts. Physicists are most cynical when reading other people's work.
exactly. this is bullshit. people are being fooled; and the host doesn't know shit. this is why it people should start reading better books from an early age.
@@subashchapagain341 being a skeptical and completely dismissing someone is two different things. Maybe the papers they wrote aren't valid but to completely shut them down is not the right attitude. How many physicists from Nepal have tried to write something of their own? They get their degree and start living a cosy life. We need people to do their own research and write papers and journals.
@@nihilsticgooner I see in many comments that you are supporting this guy.
First of all many Nepalease have published research articles, he is not the first one to attempt it.
Second for any hypothesis to be accepted as theory or fact it has to be experimentally proven. That is the reason why Hawking never got noble prize because his predictions has not been proved.
Third, he paints a picture of different sort of universe and with extremely simple mathematics comes up with established equations. This sort of things we used to do in exam, when we could not recall the derivation.
Fourth, His motivation as to why he approach this weird picture has not been explained properly. Only things he has said in the podcast and in 'paper' is that the current method is difficult.
Dont support pseudoscience is all I want to say. people spend their life to such work and this guy is basically mocking them all.
Clearly!!! Something as complicated as The general theory of relativity can't be dismissed with just 3 prices of paper. There must be a revolution!
Hello dai tapai ko concept kasto interesting xa. Maile yo video hera malai pani yeauta kasto question ayo. Jastai naya dimension banna lai 0 dimension dot. bata suru hunxa hai vanesi hami nai 4th dimension ho or hami 4 th dimension ho. Like maile socheko hami transparent vaye hami 4th dimentional ho.
Great job Ali and team .. I believe that you are no countering Einstein , however making it mathematically simple and easy to understand
Yo ladoo haru chutiya banauna khojdaee cha . Khoi white paper khoi peer review. ladoo jastoo religious text ko badnaam gardaee cha.
1:26:00 speed of light is always constant.
doesn't mean light will hit you simultaneously if you are in motion or at rest.
It will hit the observer who is moving towards it first.
correct me if I am wrong.
He is a bit confused here, hamile sangai vetne haina light lai but if we measure we will find the speed of light to be the same, which should not have been the case according to classical physics
Love it
aaich sk in science.
One of the most interesting episodes😀👏👏👏👏♥️
Yo kura lai ni 3d ma herna payo vne it will be the next level myan I salute this guy
Very informative podcast. Very Good 👍
Good food for thought. We can only wait and see what the future holds for your theory (can't travel through time)
Expansion of universe part was real funny :))
great podcast in Nepal
It needs to be noted that the paper is a preprint and hasn't yet been peer-reviewed. Would advise the author to publish this in a significant impact factor physics journal where the true cruxes of his postulated claims would find real ground/challenges/rebuttals amidst an international community of research scientists/reviewers. A pre-print no matter how many times read, or downloaded if not peer-reviewed holds low validation. It is a better way to make better science.
yo podcast herepaxi eutai kura vanna man lagyo Dunning Kruger effect !!!
सबै मिलेर सहयोग् गरम् र सफल् पारौँ । धेरै कुरा सिक्न जान्न पाईयो धन्यबाद् !
inaccurate! the entire paper IS INACCURATE. WTF are you talking?
Protect this man..such a talented dude.
Jaba suru bata herdai gaiyo teti nai jhan bhanda jhan curious kura haru aauney thale ..sayad yo nai maile hereko pahilo podcast hola jun maile katti pani skip nagari antim samma herey..
Dherai nai informative chha ....
Wow ,just Amazing😍😍😍. Best wishes to you both...
I am loving ❤️ and listening this guy continuously ❤
From Sunny Labh to Arif Ali, you're inviting really brilliant and proficient patrons on your shows. Keep doing man. Wanna see more!
GG fidjff from
45:40 The perception of viewing 3 dimensions in human beings is not exactly because of 2 eyes (Yes, I agree having two eyes makes one able to perceive depth more accurately) but don't forget the fact that you can have the perception of 3 dimensions by closing your one eye while opening the other. Actually we are seeing things in 2 dimensions, the reason we see things in 3 dimensions is due to the variance of light and shadows (Lighting plays an important role in our perception of 3 dimensional space) and the fact that an object closer to eye appears larger while an object farther appears smaller. Object that moves quickly through the field of view of our eye are perceived as being closer. (Same applies for one eyed man and even video cameras too). Individuals with one eye may have a reduced ability to estimate depth accurately, but come on man, they can perceive the 3 dimensional space too! The way you said having 3 eyes makes one able to see 4th dimension, that means a hypothetical machine with 3 cameras can see the 4th dimension wtf!, anyways loved your explanations ❤
Yes you have a good point .
We also have a higher dimension being inside us we call 'spirit' or soul
This helps us in preception and understanding of the world.
I feel like I am listening to Sri Nitya Pragya JI. Arif Ali seems spiritual 😅😅 How can this be possible, Physics Student Talk Spiritual. i Belive He will Rock The science. 🥰😇
Do you think writing theory is majak? Do you think physics is joke?
At first the guy with civil engineering degree and M.B.A degree can never be physicist. Because to be physicist you need to solve lots and lots of problem, you need to have solid grasp on mathematics and mathematical skills can't be aced within month. It takes years.
As he is civil engineer with master in structural engineering, One can easily predict how less time he has to think about physics problem and developing physicist mindset. He is too child to be physicist.
Some of you might argue that Einstein and Newton was also young. At first please don't compare them with him. Furthermore, Einstein was proper physics graduate.
Talking about Schrödinger writing paper while he was around ladies, yes Schrödinger was ladies man, he was seductive guy. But this doesn't mean he didn't study at all.
Scientists and physicist spend their life time solving problem with consistency. Intuition is result of repetition not some supernatural ability.
So, my kindly request to production is to bring some hard core physicist. Not some random engineer who claimed to be physicist. Stop spreading misinformation.
Do you have any idea what structural engineering is? It's all mathematics. Bolnu aagi aali sochnu parxa nih.
Why do you have to channel your inner Nepali foolishness? It's easy to pull the legs of someone. I am just asking you to do your research before spewing nonsense on someone.
@@nihilsticgooner The mathematics of structural engineering is completely different from mathematics of relativity and physics. If mathematics is all you need, the C.S students le physics ko paper lekhi vaigoni tw. You are acting like a fool actually.
"you need to have a solid grasp on mathematics and mathematical skills and can't be aced within months" I was referring to this.
@@nihilsticgooner It seems He does not understand tensor calculus. I doubt he understand any mathematics involved in theory of relativity.
Talking about structural engineer doing math, i doubt they go beyond vector calculus.
41:25 Electrons are Lepton and not Hadrons. Neutron and Proton are Hadrons but an Electron is a Lepton like muon and tau partciles. Mesons such as Pions and Kaons and Baryons like Neutron and Proton falls under Hadron. Whereas, Electron is a Lepton that falls under Fermions category!
Bro timro theory k huncha don't know but ur thought is admirable .
Best wishes
This guy actually said when we take ganja and got high we tend to become slow because we are travelling at 4th dimension 😅. I was actually laughing out loud, I am surprised he didn't laugh out 😂
Time
Thanks Arif Ali 🎉
Worth watching.
Voluceration is not a new concept. You should also explain why things expand continuously to cause voluceration. Also, explain why the sum of speed of 4th dimension object and its 3rd dimension counter object must be at the speed of light.
"vector sum" may be..coz he was talking about the "resultant speed" if i am not wrong.
@@thesilence250 But why is the resultant speed constant at C.
@@lujarajbhandari612 C mai aaera kina constant hunxa vaneko ? hera to be honest yo explain garne manxe le nai vague and obscure kura gare jasto laagyo malai..maile usko kura jati bujhe teti maile vane.. C ma constant hunu vaneko ta last ma Einstein sangai agree gare jasto dekinxa..kinaki no speed is greater than C in this universe as said by Einstein..yo C maa aaera constant hunxa vanera usle kina vaneko vanda, usle ta 4th dimension ma C ko speed ma move garxa objects haru vanyo ni ta, ho yo usko premise ho. aba afno premse lai warrant garna; sahi saabit garna usle teso vaneko hunu parxa..kinaki uslai pani thaha xa Einstein ko aru kura challenge gare pani C bhanda maathi jaana nasakine kura lai ta challenge garnai sakinna vanera..tesaile usle euta kura lai afno premise banayo ki C bhand maathi gayo bhane mero theory fail khanxa tesaile usle C mai constant hunxa bhandeko, jotko ma..aba usko yo 4th dimension ma objects C kai speed ma move garxa vanne kura chahi usko premise ho..yo first argument lai usle sahi maanera aghi badheko xa. ma ta yo premise lai nai question garxu..usle C bahek aru kunai speed dekhe na ? aru speed kina huna sakdaina? khoi yo keto k kura garxa garxa..scientific kura ma "instinct' vanne word ta use garna hudaina tara pani mero instinct le malai ta yo manxe ko kura ma dherai loopholes haru xa vanxa..i dont think he will succeed, seriously. kinaki ma science/engineering ko student thiye and i still am, tara spirituality ma mero dherai dakkhal chha. ra yaha usle spirituality lai ghusaauna khojyo tyo ekdum thik laagena malai..totally crap..science kai kura ma stick bhaako bhae ramro hunthyo.. the moment he started talking of spiritual books he got exposed, atleast for me..ra euta kura ma pani jote ko maile thaha pae bhane feri ma uslai pattyauna sakdina aru kura ma pani.usle aru dherai thauma jote ko chha, ma confirmed xu esma..
I am a working Physicist and I think Arif is out of his mind.
54:15 sushant is talking about anunaki ..
Sahii kura hoo every individual anusar time dilation hunxaoo malaini practical Anubhav xaa
Dai feri Arif dai lai lawnu paryo he is awesome person
Watching this second time to understand 4th dimension.
Maile tw still bujhna sakirako xaina may be management ko student vaira hola 🙄
I do have some understanding in dimension i really appreciate u in ur information
Ho vai ek choti gaja Khako 4th dimension ma pugdira bau ko duee laat khaye paxhi feri 3 dimension ma farkiye.. experience was worth it bro..yo podcast ma aauda ne bro 4th dimension Mai Cha jasto cha ganja khayera
For those who are really enthusiastic the answer of 1:29:26 can be found in @Veritasium channel. You can check
Why no one has measured speed of light ho?
@@foreducationonly7114 i exactly don't know but i have watched.
Only the speed of life is constant regardless of reference point of view. How that works I exactly forgot but might watched at Veritasium
I love watching your video Dai. Great work Dai. Keep doing it.
Just wow😮
I loved you guys!!! Really ejoyed!!! This guy could be something!!!
maile padde but has many drawbacks
- first of all his postulate has no theoretical or experimental evidence/support that the total velocity of 4-D hyperbody is always constant.
- if that's the case the total Energy of a body is always constant which further implies a body in a motion in 3-D has less rest-mass energy, which isn't not the result form special relativity.
-second: it didn't explain constant speed of light for all frame of reference.
-third: according to this I could have time dilation even I reduce 4_th spatial dimension i.e for constant motion in 3-D analogous to this hypothesis
- last but not least: how could changing velocity in one particular dimension affect velocity in other dimension, if its true it violate conservation of linear momentum
Very nice interpretation of theory. Keep it up.
Science vanesita etti long podcast ni ramailo lagxa.
Big Dreams
Support you brother
आरिफ ब्रो लाई यत्रो खोज गर्ने समय चै कसरी निस्किन्छ होला? की त जब मा की त घुमेकै मात्र देखिन्छ। Any ways, get full success soon.
We will find gems as we go deeper in this podcast 😂. This guy said We can see two dimensions because we have two eye . Lord shiva has three eye so he can see Third dimension 😂.I wonder how many dimensions housefly can see lol
This one podcast has ruined the credibility of the channel. This guy has a degree in struc engg and claims to challenge gtr. Nothing sounds more funny 😂😂
Testo bhaneko xaena...2 ota aakha le chai 3D views dekhinxa bhaneko ho ..
Try gara euta aakha chimlera hera kunai pani object lai...kati tadha cha bhanera mind le calculate garna nai sakdaina...
@@shishirbhusal7956 broo his co-author is someone with a degree in MBA and they have a paper of 3 pages on time dilation in d4th spatial dimensions and the mathematics you see there is not even plus 2 level 🤣🤣
@@ramankhadka8388 this sound stupid because we can feel those dimensions even without eyes.
@@shishirbhusal7956main maal, gudi hunu paryo paper ma. Degree segree yesto kaitey kura nagarau ta
Sushant bro, what an episode yaar!
Honestly, get English sub for this video to get it globally understood. Whatever he is saying makes a lot of sense.
You got one more subscriber❤
everything volucerates at speed of light..say this your theory is complete..if u say so" u can say that all photon are still.. and because of our implicit light speed, we still see it moving at light speed"..this should solve all controversies..
This man is talkin’ real shit bruh
If you’re slow then you can’t get his physics
He is synchronizing every fuckin existed hypothesis
I’m glad that i could synchronize all his time dilation concept of each human
such a valuable discussion. Delited
I can clearly see that daile ajhai 4th dimension bujhnu bhayena 😂
Interesting 📍
Bro time is not watch time is about atoms how they react we all made of atoms so if u move speed of light ur body atoms will react slowly so ur age will not increase fast 😊
Of course time is not hand watch