Best Medium Format Film Stocks

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 17 окт 2024

Комментарии • 29

  • @Kylejphotographer
    @Kylejphotographer Год назад +5

    Surprisingly I actually loved how Fomapan 400 looked when shot on my Kiev 60

  • @LBAW
    @LBAW Год назад +12

    Just got some Kodak Gold 200 in 120 and I’ve been getting some nice results

  • @whosjozikolnik
    @whosjozikolnik Год назад +4

    time stamps because I can't live without them:
    0:29 Portra 400
    1:19 Portra 800
    1:58 Cinestill 400D
    3:08 Ektar 100
    4:12 Cinestill 800T
    5:15 Lomography 400
    5:55 Tri-X
    6:45 HP5

    • @metalfingersfilm
      @metalfingersfilm  Год назад +1

      doing God's work out here, added to the description, thanks doggie

  • @tedcrosby9361
    @tedcrosby9361 5 месяцев назад +2

    Kodak actually re-engineered Tri-X in 2007. The old emulsion had more silver, and had a gritty grainy look, very popular with artistic photographers. The new emulsion has finer grain, and is technically a better film, but I preferred the old Tri X.

  • @ezpoppy55
    @ezpoppy55 4 месяца назад

    Ilford XP-2 is my go to B&W film.
    Nice overview.

  • @aantonic
    @aantonic Год назад +2

    FOMA 100 BW fil, i think in US its branded as Arista or something like that. Cheap and great film

  • @Emilioh888
    @Emilioh888 Год назад +2

    What about portra 160?

  • @mrca2004
    @mrca2004 10 месяцев назад +1

    I like portra 160 in my 645 for the smaller grain shooting it at 100 and being able to use 2.8 lenses, 400 in my 67 because I trade larger grain for higher iso... I shoot it at 200. Hp5 in my 67 as it has minimal grain and plenty of sharpness there. In my 645, I love acros 100 at 200 or tmax 400 at 200/400.

  • @nemourseiss6654
    @nemourseiss6654 6 месяцев назад

    Great video. Question what medium format film stock is best to get that cinematic feel not just scenery but for portraits too?

  • @Adam-wl8wn
    @Adam-wl8wn Год назад +1

    I like lomo but it's a pain in the arse to load into a tank sometimes cos of how thin the film is.

  • @koltinn
    @koltinn Год назад

    "I only recommend pushing when necessary"
    Me who develops hp5+ at 3200 asa: Bet.
    Joke but I mainly shoot 135/35mm
    I do not have a red filter hnce the high asa numbers,I like grain and pronounced contrast hence why the choice and I am using all ilford chems.
    Tri-x is a bit to expensive to me.
    I live in Norway which has a lot of forests I like fuji greens but not the horrible green cast it gets when underexposing, then again I do not really like the ektachrome blues.
    My dad used to shoot Fuji provia 100 and 400x this was back in mid/late 80s. Fuji Provia 100F is production atm (shame that you guys cant have velvia due to reasons.).
    Have a silbera roll of 135 but not developed yet, would post pics but I cant since if I did share a link it'll be deleted.
    If you bothered to read this have a good morning/day/evening/night where-ever you guys live

    • @Taka.1011
      @Taka.1011 Год назад

      Take a look at SantaColor/ other kodak aerocolor based stocks. They have really cool greens in C41, but awful skin reproduction (it's ok if it's for landscape)

  • @kurtozan251
    @kurtozan251 Год назад +1

    Cinestill Bwxx is amazing too

    • @metalfingersfilm
      @metalfingersfilm  Год назад +1

      Hell yeah!! I've actually never shot it, surprisingly! Thanks for watching, homie!

  • @notyourtipicaltechguy6438
    @notyourtipicaltechguy6438 Год назад

    Try acros ii and develop it in ddx :)

  • @j.decasas
    @j.decasas Год назад

    I came here to compliment the turnover album.👌🏼

  • @marcosramirez5257
    @marcosramirez5257 3 месяца назад

    turnover mentioned 🦅

  • @yassinesobh4165
    @yassinesobh4165 Год назад

    That turnover vinyl 😮‍💨