That’s crazy how she claims her actions where bipartisan. When all 9 Supreme Court justices agreed on the ruling I get that majority are republican but 3 democrats judges agreed to it as well that seems actually bipartisan
They are trying to save face in light of all of the loss to people's freedoms from the Dobbs decision over woman's right to healthcare and the stalling of decisions that favor Trump by delaying accountability. They're trying to look unified. SCOTUS has lost all credibility. They are providing the American people with a glimpse of what it's like when they can't depend on the highest court in the US to make decisions that favor the people of the US.
They didnt all fully agree on the entire opinion just the States question. Almost half the Justices think they went to far saying only Congress can act. And those dissents include the Judge who wrote the opinion
If I were a citizen of the state of Colorado I would be very concerned about the impartiality of my state’s justice system. Their decision to ban Trump from the ballot was a purely political move. And that is scary.
So a person that was clearly found to try and cheat our votes , should be in power position to do it again, so we voting to vote our rights and ability to have our votes counted away. You know we have the influence of one vote and you can vote for however have what policies you like, but not put people in power that takes away our voting rights, thats the same as voting that some people shouldnt be allowed to have a speedy trial. However no being able to vote for the person trying to circumvent democracy doesnt take your vote away to vote for the policies you like, just for the person that doesnt think your vote shouldnt really count and would now be in power to do lots of damage.
@byzantium8851 I'm sure breathing is partly a challenge when you have that much Trump derangement syndrome, it's clear as day it was all a political hit job and the dems failed miserably lol
@@marshwetland3808 Colorado by trying to remove a presidential candidate from their ballot (unreasonably), which is unconstitutional, therefore illegal. Why do you think it was a unanimous decision (9-0) by the highest court of the land to allow said candidate to remain on the ballot?
"Disappointed " because they realised that this was NOT a Kangaroo court, and this was NOT Pakistan !!. America has a powerful judiciary that actually protects democracy.
Republican's have not won the majority of the presidential vote in 20 years. Not a democracy. If they gave a crap about democracy every vote would count the same in the presidential election. Minority rule.
"would do it again" Proves that it's not enough to pronounce to these people UNANIMOUSLY that they're wrong. If there's no penalty, they're just going to continue to do it over and over again.
The majority of people both democrats and republicans believe its up to the people to decide who they want to vote for, not a state deciding who they CAN vot for. Colorado got put in their place.
( 6-Republicans + 3-Democrats ) or ( 6-Democrats + 3-Republicans ) These numbers will never fair. Because, they will favor their party. ( 3-R + 3-D + 3-I ) or ( 4-R + 4-D + 1-I ) These numbers will be better. Their judgments maybe more balance. Lately, Clarence Thomas has a lot of issues about taking gifts and receiving favors. It seems he is a corrupting justice. His wife also involved in Jan-6.
This wouldn't have been an issue if the Confederate insurrectionists weren't handled with kid gloves after the end of the Civil War. Apparently, we have reached the point where attempting to overthrow the government doesn't incur any consequences.
I agree. It’s not enough that the Supreme Court found democrats interfering in the election by illegally attempting to remove the front runner. The democrat dictators need serious consequences.
Nope. You took too long to answer. Our government is falling down. Something has to save us. SCOTUS said too much? Not even a professional rule for the Art of writing.
They ruled that congress has to determine that all candidates are eligable. Congress has not done that yet. When will congress be determining that all candidates are eligable? Will Congress now have to review again if Trump aided insurectionists? What if Congress falsely determines Biden ineligable? What is the appeal prossess?
Even if a challenge could be raised in FEDERAL COURT, No one has Article 3 STANDING to do so. In other words, no one can show injury in fact due to Trump apparent disqualification of engaging in insurrection.
The SCOTUS decision also doesn't mention chocolate being better then vanilla, but maybe ill go on MSNBC and spout that crap as if what isn't included in the decision means something in a desperate attempt to validate my existence....
And now you are trying to explain your ignorance of the Constitution? And that is your defense? Doing the same thing twice and expecting different results is a sign of insanity! "But I will do it again!"
@@joeg9112i'm not talking about the 9 saying States can't remove Donald from the ballot. I'm talking about the 5 who said the 14th amendment is void since congress made no law regarding it.
Oh, that's better. Not really cause treason is your opinion and no one's else's. LOL. Step up and bring them to court then if you are a real American! I'll wait! Screaming treason and insurrection does not make it so. Prove it in a court of LAW!
The FBI investigation of Trump found no insurrection, therefore there were no charges. If anyone has copies of the indictments or charges, or the guilty verdict please direct me to them. I like to see evidence.
![FNAF vs TF2 - Episode 2 [SFM]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/z5b3V2-VLb0/mqdefault.jpg)
That’s crazy how she claims her actions where bipartisan. When all 9 Supreme Court justices agreed on the ruling I get that majority are republican but 3 democrats judges agreed to it as well that seems actually bipartisan
They are trying to save face in light of all of the loss to people's freedoms from the Dobbs decision over woman's right to healthcare and the stalling of decisions that favor Trump by delaying accountability. They're trying to look unified. SCOTUS has lost all credibility. They are providing the American people with a glimpse of what it's like when they can't depend on the highest court in the US to make decisions that favor the people of the US.
She's wasted she's afraid she's going to have her six pot plants taken away.
They didnt all fully agree on the entire opinion just the States question. Almost half the Justices think they went to far saying only Congress can act. And those dissents include the Judge who wrote the opinion
@@thomasp8565 And 5 cats she put in that room behind her
@@NopeUghUghAbsolutelyNotthat is straw clutching at its finest
It was a 9-0 unanimous decision to uphold the constitution. Colorado decision wasn't even remotely unanimous.
But trump wants to do away with the constitution and he is an insurrectionist so he should not be on the ballot.
If I were a citizen of the state of Colorado I would be very concerned about the impartiality of my state’s justice system. Their decision to ban Trump from the ballot was a purely political move. And that is scary.
Acquitted of insurrection* obviously they ruled unanimously for a reason, kicking him off the ballot is unconstitutional! Full stop
Kangaroo court,
So a person that was clearly found to try and cheat our votes , should be in power position to do it again, so we voting to vote our rights and ability to have our votes counted away.
You know we have the influence of one vote and you can vote for however have what policies you like, but not put people in power that takes away our voting rights, thats the same as voting that some people shouldnt be allowed to have a speedy trial.
However no being able to vote for the person trying to circumvent democracy doesnt take your vote away to vote for the policies you like, just for the person that doesnt think your vote shouldnt really count and would now be in power to do lots of damage.
They ruled on eligibility not culpability. Is that too challenging a concept for you? It probably is..,
@byzantium8851 I'm sure breathing is partly a challenge when you have that much Trump derangement syndrome, it's clear as day it was all a political hit job and the dems failed miserably lol
Of course she would do it again it's all about her and her beliefs not about the country or what is right.
Is this person really a lawyer?
😂😂
Apparently yes. This is the new America. Trump 2024
I can't wait for him to win this year.
Me too.
So they are disappointed but would break the law again?
Who do you think broke the law?
@@marshwetland3808 Colorado by trying to remove a presidential candidate from their ballot (unreasonably), which is unconstitutional, therefore illegal. Why do you think it was a unanimous decision (9-0) by the highest court of the land to allow said candidate to remain on the ballot?
It's not the law.
And she looks wasted now
She was waste before!
So you would waste taxpayer $ and try to do something unconstitutional again...after you just found out it was unconstitutional? Nice.
Let her try Next time it will cost!!!
👍. The Democrats have lost their way,its their way or no way. The Constitution stands in their way and hate it.
@@James-to7pi According to who?
She needs to be in jail for life!
@@James-to7pi Good Lord, another armchair Constitutional lawyer that knows the law. This never gets old!
we all know she never voted for trump
9-0
That is what I would call in boxing "getting dropped down by a KO punch with just the staredown before the start of the fight"
Imagine if they ruled on the law instead of their feelings.
😂😂
@@mile_high_topherthey did explains the 9-0
@@maxbunting They admitted they ruled based on the consequences of their ruling rather than the law.
The discussion from the Supreme Court hit her so hard it gave her a black eye.
All of them would be sporting huge black eyes right up till November..
Woman,be disappointed all you want ,you don’t decide what everyone wants.
Majority of people want cheeto tried and ideally jailed if found guilty.
When it’s unanimous those in opposition stand on the wrong side of history.
Precisely. It had to be unanimous to send that exact message. Leave it to these folks, though--they still don't get it
"Disappointed " because they realised that this was NOT a Kangaroo court, and this was NOT Pakistan !!. America has a powerful judiciary that actually protects democracy.
Republican's have not won the majority of the presidential vote in 20 years. Not a democracy. If they gave a crap about democracy every vote would count the same in the presidential election. Minority rule.
A big win for democracy
Left was hoping for a Banana republic court, and instead they got a lesson in reality. Actually they got NINE lesson in reality.
Big win for America.
Democracy WON Today ❤❤❤
We knew how it was going to turn out
"would do it again" Proves that it's not enough to pronounce to these people UNANIMOUSLY that they're wrong. If there's no penalty, they're just going to continue to do it over and over again.
They got egg on their face. They should face charges for their crimes.
Take that L.
I told you she's stoner Colorado people are stoners
She don't even know what she's talking about
When will you people learn our country is free and we the people WILL choose our president!!! TRUMP 2024!!!
MSNBC...REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE Lol
You can hear the Screeching of REEEEEEEE all over America Right Now 😂😂😂😂🎉
If you’re pig squealing you’re doing it wrong
@@chrisg9840 THE SALT MUST FLOW! REEEEEEEE!!! 🧂🧂🧂
I can't wait to see that Richard Maddchow dude meltdown on the Richard Maddcow show tonight on MSNPC. 🤣🤣💪💪
@@BLaCkKsHeEp I see that. Such salt. Need more sour. Like me.
The majority of people both democrats and republicans believe its up to the people to decide who they want to vote for, not a state deciding who they CAN vot for. Colorado got put in their place.
The Supremes are sick and twisted.
At least you admit they ruled on belief, and not the law.
@@mile_high_topherThey know the law better than you.
@@roejogan7770 When did congress pass legislation keeping confederates out of office?
@@mile_high_topherlegally speaking trump didnt incite an insurrection so the law is not on your side
9-0 genius
LOL 😂 Give us those woke tears! I have a few recipes I want to try with them 😆
Kangaroo court,
I agree the tears taste great on steak.
@@eldenringer6466 Constitutional Court.....I fixed it for you! 👍
said the braindead orange cult zombie
“Try with”?
Our founding fathers would be SO proud! Those true patriots knew what they were doing!!!!
Not only the founding fathers. YOU THE PEOPLE. YOUR VOICE WAS HEARD AND ANSWERED.
I think they would've been happy if Jefferson Davis had been POTUS.
Kangaroo court,
@@eldenringer6466Cope and seethe!
Sometimes, it is just VERY obvious that a lower court fcuked up. 😂😂
Man it looks like she's been smoking pot for a long time
Colorado so go figure.
It's legal there.
Maybe that is why they think they know what they are doing. Proving weed makes you dumb.
She looks like she smokes crack lol
I'm shocked that even KJB voted for obvious justice and constitutionality
Hundreds of confederates were kept out of office without congress passing legislation. This ruling is cowardice.
I'm shocked the three liberal justices decided to rule on the consequences of their decision rather than the law.
@@James-to7pi Prove it in a court of law! Wait, you can't! GOTCHA!
@@James-to7pi Court of law does not vote! You ARE nothing!
@@James-to7pi Means nothing nimrod! A court of law not your limited mentality!
I love how they talk about j6 but ignore the hundreds of bl-m and an--tifa in...surrec...tions
"I am disappointed that what we did was ruled unconstitutional, but I would do it again"
That's how much Dems respect the Constitution
She needs to be investigated, to find out what else she’s done to violate the constitutional rights of the voters!
Did you hear that President Biden. You too can overthrow the government and stay in as long as you want😂.
there was no insurection. everyone knows this.. he was never charged
In fact, of the hundreds of people arrested and charged NOT A SINGLE PERSON was ever charged with partaking in an "insurrection."..
So the state can decide not eligible. Not charged with insurrection and didn't insight violence. You did it for fame. Go away
States determine eligibility every election cycle. This is literally gibberish.
Incite/insight
@@mile_high_topherNo it’s not.
primetime bsnbc tonite will a 3 bag popcorn nite😂
Colorado did the right thing. The SC didn't.
Sorry but the LAW says different! OUCH! 9 - 0!
@@joeg9112What law says that?
Stop crying.
We are a movement and can’t be stopped. MAGA 2024.
A bowel movement.
Move on then! The Almighty Creator has the last word! This Ain't over yet!!!!
( 6-Republicans + 3-Democrats ) or ( 6-Democrats + 3-Republicans ) These numbers will never fair. Because, they will favor their party.
( 3-R + 3-D + 3-I ) or ( 4-R + 4-D + 1-I ) These numbers will be better. Their judgments maybe more balance.
Lately, Clarence Thomas has a lot of issues about taking gifts and receiving favors. It seems he is a corrupting justice. His wife also involved in Jan-6.
Petty people.
Remove Kafer from her position and disbar these judges who wanted to remove Trump from the ballot.
This wouldn't have been an issue if the Confederate insurrectionists weren't handled with kid gloves after the end of the Civil War.
Apparently, we have reached the point where attempting to overthrow the government doesn't incur any consequences.
I agree. It’s not enough that the Supreme Court found democrats interfering in the election by illegally attempting to remove the front runner. The democrat dictators need serious consequences.
The truth is always set free. This demon never had a shot.
Scotus has been bought and needs to be replaced. They have been spiraling out of control ever since the passing of RBG.
Even the one that doesn't know what a woman is? SMH
9-0 baby
Does it hurt baby girl?
Their the only thing the Democrats need to control. Then they can change what ever laws they need to do what ever they want. Sounds a lot like Russia.
Thank God for America.
Kangaroo court,
he was not convicted of insurrection what ever happened to being innocent until proven guilty
eyes are dilated aren't they
She is on shrooms.
I’m honestly surprised that I’m not hearing more complaints that it’s a 10th amendment violation. Lol.
It’s got to hard for her to Breathe!
Just say you don't respect them. What's wrong with saying that?
G FY!
These are not serious people
She looks like such a winner however she seems like she seems like she cannot put down the fenti
WHY SHOULD STATES LISTEN TO SCOTUS ON THIS RULING IF TEXAS DIDNT.
What happened to innocent until proven guilty in court of law....you're just repeating an accusations. The only guilt is slander on your part
It’s time for Colorado to Secede from this Union.
I cant believe shes a traffic court judge, what have we come to😢
No you wont
Fired AF
C U Next Tuesday!
She can try again if its the same type of ruling she'll get the same results, only next time it could cost quite a pretty penny
Sometimes, despite the communists in the White House and congress, the system still works. Now as to the matter of Comrade Leticia...
She'll be out of office herself, enough of this BS!!!
just pathetic
Stay MAD😅😅😅😅
YOU FAILED 💅🏻
9-0 Let the people decide
A Karen Lawsuit 🌹
Tell her - Duh!!!
Just let the people vote fairly and the majority always wins.
And she's afraid that Trump is going to take away her six pot plants she's growing in her house
He was Never charged with insurrection! Quit lying
What is she taking about????
Nope. You took too long to answer. Our government is falling down. Something has to save us. SCOTUS said too much? Not even a professional rule for the Art of writing.
They ruled that congress has to determine that all candidates are eligable. Congress has not done that yet. When will congress be determining that all candidates are eligable?
Will Congress now have to review again if Trump aided insurectionists?
What if Congress falsely determines Biden ineligable? What is the appeal prossess?
Putting a bell on a cat. Interesting metaphor for a lady who probably owns many many cats.
Thanks SC !
😂😂😂😂🎉🎉🎉🎉!!!!
He can be on, but don't vote for him! Simple as that.
GO. TRUMP. …💪🏽👍🏻🇺🇸💪🏽👍🏻💪🏽🇺🇸💪🏽👍🏻
You win some, you lose some. Trump should have learned that lesson and we wouldn't have had to have this case.
'Disappointed' but 'would do it again': that would make you twice as stupid
Even if a challenge could be raised in FEDERAL COURT, No one has Article 3 STANDING to do so. In other words, no one can show injury in fact due to Trump apparent disqualification of engaging in insurrection.
Biden isn't the answer and the best America has to offer is Trump? America is in trouble
9-O. get over it Liberals
Cry baby LAME stream media!!!!🤣🤣😂😂👍👍
The SCOTUS decision also doesn't mention chocolate being better then vanilla, but maybe ill go on MSNBC and spout that crap as if what isn't included in the decision means something in a desperate attempt to validate my existence....
And now you are trying to explain your ignorance of the Constitution? And that is your defense? Doing the same thing twice and expecting different results is a sign of insanity! "But I will do it again!"
By 6:06, funny is today all of a sudden-- I had the term "fairrance prudence" pop in my head.... GO FATHER DEMOCRATS
So, Krista, can I smear your name by saying you a drug store robber when you haven't even been charged with the crime?
Do it again.
Charge those 5 SCOTUS judges responsible with treason.
It was a 9 - 0 decision nimrod!
@@joeg9112i'm not talking about the 9 saying States can't remove Donald from the ballot. I'm talking about the 5 who said the 14th amendment is void since congress made no law regarding it.
Oh, that's better. Not really cause treason is your opinion and no one's else's. LOL. Step up and bring them to court then if you are a real American! I'll wait! Screaming treason and insurrection does not make it so. Prove it in a court of LAW!
😂 Sounds more like sour grapes after taking away my power to decide for my state. Now we have to rely on our voters.
I like this lady.
YOU HAD A GREAT REASON FOR TAKING HIM OFF THE BALLOT! GOOD FOR YOU/YOU ARE PUTTING THE COUNTRY BEFORE AN INSURECTIONIST!
Didn’t know they teach English in North Korea.
They don't teach the shift key in NK
She would do it again? She is unteachable, incompetent and unwilling to learn.
lol she is hilarious, definitely not credible but hilarious
Stop electing geriatrics
Imagine when the supreme Court says he is eligible with liberals in there and u have this clown saying they are wrong.
Partisan...... There was nothing bipartisan about this at all.
She madddd 😂😂😂😂😂
The FBI investigation of Trump found no insurrection, therefore there were no charges.
If anyone has copies of the indictments or charges, or the guilty verdict please direct me to them. I like to see evidence.