Prandtl Number

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 11 янв 2025

Комментарии • 20

  • @StudySessionYT
    @StudySessionYT  Год назад +1

    View the updated version of this video here: ruclips.net/video/tXl3zViNT0U/видео.html

  • @stephenfulmer8646
    @stephenfulmer8646 3 года назад +1

    I can understand his English omg thank you!!!

  • @jadejabrijrajsinh9664
    @jadejabrijrajsinh9664 4 года назад +1

    I liked the way you presented, as well as your description.

    • @StudySessionYT
      @StudySessionYT  4 года назад

      I’m glad you found the video helpful Jadeja! Thanks for watching!

  • @shankhariswaminathan7477
    @shankhariswaminathan7477 4 года назад +7

    Beautifully presented video! What program do you use for it?
    And I have a couple of observations:
    1. the mathematical expression for Prandtl number is (mu*Cp)/k, not (mu*Cp)/rho.
    2. the 'note' says that the rate of transport of a property is inversely correlated to its boundary layer thickness, but it is the other way 'round.

    • @StudySessionYT
      @StudySessionYT  4 года назад +5

      Great catch Shankhari! I have pinned your comment to the top so other students can view your contribution!

    • @shankhariswaminathan7477
      @shankhariswaminathan7477 4 года назад +4

      @@StudySessionYT woah, this is so encouraging. Thanks! :D
      And what program do you use to present those blackboard drawings?
      P. S. Your video helped me TONS when I was having difficulties with some advanced concepts. Keep making these videos! :D

    • @StudySessionYT
      @StudySessionYT  4 года назад +3

      @@shankhariswaminathan7477 I’m glad you find the videos helpful I really enjoy making them! And I use GoodNotes 5 on my iPad and then speed it up in DaVinci Resolve!

  • @vaghelaohm3678
    @vaghelaohm3678 3 года назад

    marvellous work done!!!

  • @peni6315
    @peni6315 2 года назад +1

    you are wrong, the figure on the top of blackboard is Pr>1, and the blue line still over the red line. it is very confused me.

  • @zynga512
    @zynga512 4 года назад +1

    Great job

  • @luke9771
    @luke9771 3 года назад

    I thought it would never be the case that the thermal conditions are fully developed and hydrodynamic conditions are developing. Since the temperature distribution depends on the velocity distribution.

  • @benportz2145
    @benportz2145 3 года назад +4

    At 0.38 there is an error in the formula for Prandtl number. You wrote the final result is (heat capacitance*dynamic viscosity/density) when it should be (heat capacitance*dynamic viscosity/conductive heat transfer coefficient) (cp*u/p) when it should be (cp*u/k) - The k is what it should be.
    Good video otherwise.

    • @benportz2145
      @benportz2145 3 года назад

      Oh just saw that Shankhari already said that.

    • @StudySessionYT
      @StudySessionYT  3 года назад +1

      @@benportz2145 yes the errors have been appended in the pinned comment by Shankhari like you said, but great catch as well!

  • @ganeshmule9647
    @ganeshmule9647 9 месяцев назад

    Graphs are wrong

  • @avadheshsingh492
    @avadheshsingh492 2 года назад +1

    before uploading videos plz double check ...

  • @JohnRMTurner
    @JohnRMTurner 3 года назад +1

    Great video