Something to note about the longer ending of mark is that yes the oldest mark manuscripts we have stop at verse 8. Which i think is literally only 2 examples, and they are both alexandrean. But we have older quotation from church fathers citing the longer ending of nark as scripture. So we kniw for certian the longer ending of mark existed before the 2 alexandrean manuscripts that lack it. So its not that the longer ending of mark is an addition some time after those manuscripts were copied, it is that fir one reason, or anothet those 2 alexandrean manuscripts decided to not include the rest of the ending.
According to Ken Johnson there wasn't 2000 years of history before men penned their interactions with God. Men developed writing early on. The Bible itself refers to writings of the ancients and the records of the Essenes (Dead Sea Scrolls) show as much.
The King James Bible has helped save millions of people over it 400 years plus existence. Those churches promoting other Bible versions are opening up a very real Tower of Babel situation where only confusion can abound.
The oldest manuscripts are the Alexandrian manuscripts that were saved from the garbage pile. Thats what the modern bibles are translated from. Read the king James bible its perfectly preserved for English readers.
![Ready to Reason with Dr. Jason Lisle [Session 2]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/lkuSXr4OFHs/mqdefault.jpg)
![Ready to Reason with Dr. Jason Lisle [Session 2]](/img/tr.png)
![Ready to Reason with Dr. Jason Lisle [Session 1]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/_LAFmAkqYhA/mqdefault.jpg)
I love this but it scratchy I can’t hear it very well
Excellent!
I wonder why they couldn't run the cord behind the screen.
Wish this could be redone. Can’t take the scratch
Im King James only. Its the perfect word of God for our English audience. Praise the Lord.
All of the more literal English translations are just as good.
Something to note about the longer ending of mark is that yes the oldest mark manuscripts we have stop at verse 8. Which i think is literally only 2 examples, and they are both alexandrean.
But we have older quotation from church fathers citing the longer ending of nark as scripture. So we kniw for certian the longer ending of mark existed before the 2 alexandrean manuscripts that lack it. So its not that the longer ending of mark is an addition some time after those manuscripts were copied, it is that fir one reason, or anothet those 2 alexandrean manuscripts decided to not include the rest of the ending.
Oh gosh, I want to watch this but the audio.
According to Ken Johnson there wasn't 2000 years of history before men penned their interactions with God. Men developed writing early on. The Bible itself refers to writings of the ancients and the records of the Essenes (Dead Sea Scrolls) show as much.
Audio got ruined sadly 🙁
I love this channel, but the audio broke. I have ADHD and can’t listen to this because of the audio
I'm trying to deal with the audio. Hard but not impossible.
The King James Bible has helped save millions of people over it 400 years plus existence. Those churches promoting other Bible versions are opening up a very real Tower of Babel situation where only confusion can abound.
No, actually the opposite is True.
@@alexyounkin1476Based on what?
Based on what is your assertion alantasman8273?
The old KJV translation is the worst translation to me. I use multiple versions of the Bible to better understand what I am reading.
The oldest manuscripts are the Alexandrian manuscripts that were saved from the garbage pile. Thats what the modern bibles are translated from. Read the king James bible its perfectly preserved for English readers.
Wash your hair!!!