Brilliant talk. Every Indian who cares about the future of our country and our democracy should listen and contemplate on the issues he has raised. Thank you very much. 🙏
The recent judgement by SC on the govs refusal to sworn in as minister is well addressed The switch over of MLA to rule party ,the speaker is taken to task by SC In HP the defecting MLAs along with 3 of independent MLAs now need to seek fresh mandate from People. The role of judiciary as watchdog is on rails.
Sir Why it took 4 years to take up the matter related to repeal of Article 370. Why all the constitutional matters are regularly heard by constitutional bench now?
It takes sweat and blood to reach a level that Nariman Sir has reached - his clarity in analyzing the topics is exemplary .. Thank you sir and thank you Bar and Bench Channel
We need to circulate this speech of #Justice #RohintonNariman on #ConstitutionalLaw to all the citizens of #India especially to all #schools #colleges for their #empowerment and protection of their #humanrights truly disturbing in today's timid #SupremeCourtofIndia. Thankyou #Justice #RohintonNariman 🙏
A justifiable apple and tree story, so much respect for the illustrious pair. The constitution HAS to be cared for by by sensitive and caring hands, ARE WE DOING IT IS THE QUESTION. Wondering who will bell the cat can now be put to rest.
To begin with they wouldn't even listen and in case they do, they won't understand kuz of cloudy whether which would hinder direct signal to their brains.
Justice Rohinton Nariman, is one of the most learned and fearless judge of the Supreme Court on Constitution law . His suggestion and interpretation of the Constitution are worth considering .
Let there be competative exams for High court judges...then recruit... SC can order Central Government to increase Retirement Age to 70 or till life..they can order ao Anything under Sun
@@Ram1kusum look at your own gurus look at dipak misra and ranjan gogoi and bobde the kind of judgements/orders they passed were they "independent" bakwas mat Karo boring aadmi
Vahiyaat Baseless presumption that judges are somehow better than elected prime minister or law minister Glaring nepotism is a matter of shame to the judiciary.. Why do judges want to rule by backdoor?
Because judges are part of adversarial system having India adopted so. And they are meant to act as backdoor checkers on all other constitutional system for the adequate functioning of Democratic Nation.
It is only because of Judiciary that Modi Sarkar has not been able to convert the country a dictator controlled cop\untry Judiciary are the custodian of Democracy.
Very sad to hear Rohington . He could have stopped with speaking on constitutional law. Instead he dabbled on subjects to which he has no expertise or exposure. What does he know of politics? Has he ever stepped into the streets and addressed a common man? Kashmir is an integral part of India, but will have its own laws. Whom did it benefit, except a handful of politicians. On BBC, even those fellows agreed on breach of indian laws and this chap says they are targetted. Good god, is this how he decided cases in court without reading the brief😂😅
Nothing better can be expected from a harebrained nut who opens his gob after switching off his Upper Story or the Upper story is unoccupied. You can't even spell the name of the Justice correctly. Do you know Justice Nariman gave a dissent note on the decision of the Collegium selecting the panel of judges from Supreme Court in which Justice Akil Qureshi's name was removed as per the desire of Modi Govt? He is a man of character with a moral compass intact! You better keep your gob shut!
Having practical experience in the subject is the core issue. Living room opinions without anything more was the critical comment. One need not be a supreme court judge to know the law. Such a deception requires rehaul of your esteemed opinion. Many lawyers and professors of constitutional law are better equipped than the judges. Untrained minds cannot traverse beyond borders. Sitting in a room and offering one thoughts is no different
@@rajjakhmola7761 Changing time needs change in approach as well. His own father has said that 370 was a temporary provision and there was no special status ,a few days ago . Now the only question is 'Was the way to remove 370 constitutional?'. If the govt. would have gone the way of getting the consent of legislative assembly or constitution making bench of j&k , but both didn't exist at that time. So whose fault was it that there was so much political crisis and i know u know the answer to that.
@@navaneethrchari Rohinton F Nariman was a lawyer of some standing before he was directly appointed to the Supreme Court as the Judge. The issues he talked aren't political science and drawing room talk; he talked about the Constitutionalism. It is unfortunate that a section of society has so latched itself with a political philosophy and the entity that they have begun to talk like a lobtomised Nuts and you are one of that lot who talks out of his hat. And you have the cheeks to sermonise and pontificate with upper story switched off!
Brilliant talk. Every Indian who cares about the future of our country and our democracy should listen and contemplate on the issues he has raised. Thank you very much. 🙏
People like you who are enjoying the power generation to generation .
Power is under fist of a few people in Bharat.
The recent judgement by SC on the govs refusal to sworn in as minister is well addressed
The switch over of MLA to rule party ,the speaker is taken to task by SC
In HP the defecting MLAs along with 3 of independent MLAs now need to seek fresh mandate from People.
The role of judiciary as watchdog is on rails.
Sir
Why it took 4 years to take up the matter related to repeal of Article 370.
Why all the constitutional matters are regularly heard by constitutional bench now?
A GREAT EYE OPENING LECTURE BY A GREAT MAN OF LAW. OUR SUPREME COURT WILL BECOME THE TEMPLE OF JUSTICE IF IT IS FILLED WITH ONLY THESE KIND OF JUDGES.
It takes sweat and blood to reach a level that Nariman Sir has reached - his clarity in analyzing the topics is exemplary .. Thank you sir and thank you Bar and Bench Channel
Indeed! 👍
We need to circulate this speech of #Justice #RohintonNariman on #ConstitutionalLaw to all the citizens of #India especially to all #schools #colleges for their #empowerment and protection of their #humanrights truly disturbing in today's timid #SupremeCourtofIndia. Thankyou #Justice #RohintonNariman 🙏
Very important speech for every Indian citizen
A justifiable apple and tree story, so much respect for the illustrious pair. The constitution HAS to be cared for by by sensitive and caring hands, ARE WE DOING IT IS THE QUESTION. Wondering who will bell the cat can now be put to rest.
Great speech by Great Man
What WRITE Book 📚 books by PUBLISHED with
Excellent
No collegium system ???
Thank you Justice Rohinton for beautiful lecture on constitutional subject matter
Question with
You must praise Rahul Binchi and pray for a rajyasabha Birth
A pure congress soul
With
Modi Bhakts are disappointed
To begin with they wouldn't even listen and in case they do, they won't understand kuz of cloudy whether which would hinder direct signal to their brains.
Mr Junior Chandrachur can you hear the message of your senior retired colleague here... correct yourself ....
👍
Justice Rohinton Nariman, is one of the most learned and fearless judge of the Supreme Court on Constitution law . His suggestion and interpretation of the Constitution are worth considering .
Right CHIP of the OLD BLOCK. 🎉🙏
Rohington Nariman does not say one word about the Collegium issue. Shows where his loyalty lies.
Collegium has problem but it is far better than what government wants do with appointment of Judges... please study more
Constitution of India Part I to Part IV should be translated to Hindi and State Languages to appraise PEOPLE
All parts of the constitution are already available in all 22 scheduled languages.
He means the SC judges are not aware of the checks and balances?
THESE JUDGES ARE THE BEST JUDGES INDIA HAD SEEN IN RECENT TIMES. NOW A DAYS IT IS SCARCE TO EXPECT SUCH NOBLE PEOPLE IN SERVICE OF PEOPLE.
Great to hear 'Disturbing' from such an eminent jurist. 🎉🙏
PDF with
Let there be competative exams for High court judges...then recruit...
SC can order Central Government to increase Retirement Age to 70 or till life..they can order ao Anything under Sun
Answer about
You were SC judge as you belongs to such family who have influence in collegium system...??
😅😅😅😅😅😅 mentally challenged highly educated Congress admirer
Talk like a congress leader
बीबीसी 😅😅
Just.r nariman,why can't people like u urge icj & uno intervene to throw away modi shah rss trio?
It is considered fashionable in India to criticize Modi. Anything goes in the name of criticism.
Pehle Umar Khalid ko bail dedo phir bakwas Karo jhutte heartless judges
Communal Bhakt.
@@Ram1kusum jab judge tha tab muh kyon nahi khola aur tabhi tum jaise log kaha the ???
@@Ram1kusum look at your own gurus look at dipak misra and ranjan gogoi and bobde the kind of judgements/orders they passed were they "independent" bakwas mat Karo boring aadmi
@@vedchavan you have chosen the correct Judges check what happens after they retire you will have your reply
Vahiyaat
Baseless presumption that judges are somehow better than elected prime minister or law minister
Glaring nepotism is a matter of shame to the judiciary..
Why do judges want to rule by backdoor?
Because judges are part of adversarial system having India adopted so. And they are meant to act as backdoor checkers on all other constitutional system for the adequate functioning of Democratic Nation.
It is only because of Judiciary that Modi Sarkar has not been able to convert the country a dictator controlled cop\untry Judiciary are the custodian of Democracy.
Why is he speaking anti india? A tight rap to his learned face.A learned person will never speak like this.
Anti-India? How?
Your Comments only confirms you are an anti Indian Bhakt.
This guy has a selective approach,where he was when Congress made blunders,during 2011-13
WHAT BLUNDERS?
Very sad to hear Rohington . He could have stopped with speaking on constitutional law. Instead he dabbled on subjects to which he has no expertise or exposure. What does he know of politics? Has he ever stepped into the streets and addressed a common man? Kashmir is an integral part of India, but will have its own laws. Whom did it benefit, except a handful of politicians. On BBC, even those fellows agreed on breach of indian laws and this chap says they are targetted. Good god, is this how he decided cases in court without reading the brief😂😅
In these days of living room experts you seem to be one of them knowing more than a SC judge. 😂
Nothing better can be expected from a harebrained nut who opens his gob after switching off his Upper Story or the Upper story is unoccupied. You can't even spell the name of the Justice correctly.
Do you know Justice Nariman gave a dissent note on the decision of the Collegium selecting the panel of judges from Supreme Court in which Justice Akil Qureshi's name was removed as per the desire of Modi Govt?
He is a man of character with a moral compass intact!
You better keep your gob shut!
Having practical experience in the subject is the core issue. Living room opinions without anything more was the critical comment. One need not be a supreme court judge to know the law. Such a deception requires rehaul of your esteemed opinion. Many lawyers and professors of constitutional law are better equipped than the judges. Untrained minds cannot traverse beyond borders. Sitting in a room and offering one thoughts is no different
@@rajjakhmola7761 Changing time needs change in approach as well. His own father has said that 370 was a temporary provision and there was no special status ,a few days ago . Now the only question is 'Was the way to remove 370 constitutional?'. If the govt. would have gone the way of getting the consent of legislative assembly or constitution making bench of j&k , but both didn't exist at that time. So whose fault was it that there was so much political crisis and i know u know the answer to that.
@@navaneethrchari Rohinton F Nariman was a lawyer of some standing before he was directly appointed to the Supreme Court as the Judge.
The issues he talked aren't political science and drawing room talk; he talked about the Constitutionalism.
It is unfortunate that a section of society has so latched itself with a political philosophy and the entity that they have begun to talk like a lobtomised Nuts and you are one of that lot who talks out of his hat.
And you have the cheeks to sermonise and pontificate with upper story switched off!