Don't be bitter. I know what a fact is, you have shown overwhelming evidence that you do not. Have you considered what you're actually hearing may have been intended...? Have you considered that you may just dislike it...? Maybe you're just incorrect? Again, mull upon the fact that this is youtube - the quality isn't great. Know that It takes more than good mixing to make good music - it takes passion, a will to create, and the desire to entertain.
Theoretically Bach's 'Minuet in G major' is simple, and formulaic. Theoretically, Beethoven's 'Moonlight Sonata', is simple and formualic. That doen't mean that they're quintessentially bad. Your opinion of the referenced compositions is a matter of personal taste. I'm afraid it's not down to you whether I like somthing or not. Your opinions mean nothing to me.
So instead of responding to my factual argument, you again resort to making wild allegations toward my English language prowess. My syntax was purposeful, as in "Neither a borrower nor leander be". Though, not used as a full sentence in Hamlet, it was latter adapted by Benjamin Franklin as a complete quote. In these situations I always refer to the internet proverb that says: "When one has no answer, it is easier to attack the opponent's grammar than accept defeat". That is facts my ass!
Please, try not to pull more 'facts' your ass in your practically inevitable reply. And, yes it is appropriate to put quotes in speech marks. I did, intentionally write that sentence that way, because it is conversational and informal, referencing a common colloquial saying. Try answering these questions: Is your band theoretically simple and formulaic, in the context of other bands in the genre? Can you hear the production mistakes, that offer us a sound not intended by the band?
Because they only have 591 views after a whole year? No offense but kind of generic pap with a slightly annoying singer does not make a famous band be (unless you have big money backing). Also the mixing on this song is atrocious, everything bleeds into each other and there is no focus. Fix these things and put a rumor on youtube that the singer is hot, and teenagers will come.
'Wild allegations'? Hardly - both your sentence structure and grammar are piss poor. In addition, you are in fact paraphrasing Aristotle - inaccurately, at that. What is more, your 'factual argument' is in fact 'your opinion'. Is there anything else you would like to know?
How are you guys not ridiculously famous?!
Start from the bottom... ↓
'That is facts my ass!'
What even?!
Don't be bitter. I know what a fact is, you have shown overwhelming evidence that you do not. Have you considered what you're actually hearing may have been intended...? Have you considered that you may just dislike it...? Maybe you're just incorrect? Again, mull upon the fact that this is youtube - the quality isn't great. Know that It takes more than good mixing to make good music - it takes passion, a will to create, and the desire to entertain.
Theoretically Bach's 'Minuet in G major' is simple, and formulaic. Theoretically, Beethoven's 'Moonlight Sonata', is simple and formualic. That doen't mean that they're quintessentially bad. Your opinion of the referenced compositions is a matter of personal taste. I'm afraid it's not down to you whether I like somthing or not. Your opinions mean nothing to me.
And you dont put quotes in speech marks.
So instead of responding to my factual argument, you again resort to making wild allegations toward my English language prowess. My syntax was purposeful, as in "Neither a borrower nor leander be". Though, not used as a full sentence in Hamlet, it was latter adapted by Benjamin Franklin as a complete quote. In these situations I always refer to the internet proverb that says: "When one has no answer, it is easier to attack the opponent's grammar than accept defeat". That is facts my ass!
nett =) fehlt nur mehr a solo
I take it English is not your first language? I personally thought it was a pretty decent track.
It is not appropriate to put a quote in speech marks. They're called speech marks for a reason - you may as well get used to the concept.
Please, try not to pull more 'facts' your ass in your practically inevitable reply.
And, yes it is appropriate to put quotes in speech marks.
I did, intentionally write that sentence that way, because it is conversational and informal, referencing a common colloquial saying.
Try answering these questions:
Is your band theoretically simple and formulaic, in the context of other bands in the genre?
Can you hear the production mistakes, that offer us a sound not intended by the band?
Because they only have 591 views after a whole year? No offense but kind of generic pap with a slightly annoying singer does not make a famous band be (unless you have big money backing). Also the mixing on this song is atrocious, everything bleeds into each other and there is no focus. Fix these things and put a rumor on youtube that the singer is hot, and teenagers will come.
'Wild allegations'? Hardly - both your sentence structure and grammar are piss poor. In addition, you are in fact paraphrasing Aristotle - inaccurately, at that. What is more, your 'factual argument' is in fact 'your opinion'. Is there anything else you would like to know?