Absolutely to begin with, then red tape, which is put on farmers. Mr Dutton had said it as it is. Double standards everywhere. Our power is getting worse. We could never imagined this mess we are in. 😮
Common sense has a tone all of it's own. Like the man says , we can't afford another year of this government let alone 3. Everything this Labor mob has touched has turned to shit.
If Australia achieved net zero tomorrow by how many degC will the planet cool in the next 50 years. Keep in mind that China’s annual increase of emissions is greater than Australia’s total annual emissions.
Australia is ALREADY BETTER than "NetZero". A 2014 Report by Dr. Vanessa Haverd, demonstrated that whilst Australia emitted 485 million Tons of Co2 Per Year, we also ABSORBED 2.2 BILLION, that is BILLION, Tons Per year. Since that time Australia has reduced its Co2 emissions by close to 20% so we currently ABSORB 6 TIMES MORE Co2 than we emit. By comparison, China opens a new Coal Fired Power Station EVERY WEEK to provide cheap energy so they can produce goods more cost effectively than their competitors, who are forced to use "renewables" to satisfy the "woke" brigade. So, every time we make Australian energy more expensive than China, we EXPORT manufacturing jobs.
@@darrylweidenhofer Al Gore's lies were the reason they switched from 'global warming' to 'climate change'. Climate change can be used to fear monger any naturally occurring weather event.
Not just China, but they are the biggest. Anyway, it's a scam. Nuclear is our best way forward and China is already building their nuclear power stations. Even the UAE has a nuclear station and how did they make their money?
@@damo7228 The Australian people will benefit... cheaper energy bills resulting in cost reduction on all primary industries trickling down to the Australian consumers cost of living.
@davidbell6164 not necessarily! It is the old supply and demand argument. Nuclear will produce constant 24-7 electricity, prices have only gone up because supply has been strangled by cultist renewable energy policy.
Unless you’re black rock,vanguard and that other one… oh and our superfunds… welcome to socialism through coporatization… which if you go by definition is actually fascism… brought to you by the “anitfascists” we are living in a circus being led by clowns…
COME ON PEOPLE, THERE IS NO “ ZERO “ ANYWHERE IN THE UNIVERSE ! THERE IS ONLY SENSIBLE, AND CONSIDERED SMART AND SENSIBLE EVOLUTION ! NOT POLITICS WITHOUT, OBLIGATION TO THE PEOPLE ! ! !
Modern nuclear power stations are terrific, as are Modern Coal power stations. They capture the polluting particulars and give us some CO2 to feed the plants and trees, giving us Oxygen. Sadly, Peter Dutton is an unwitting traitor to our nation, like all his predecessors back in the bad old Whitlam and Fraser days, who were duped by the UN puppets for the WEF. Climate Change is the WEFs wealth redistribution has nothing to do with Climate, 49 years of just being WEF=WHO=UN Puppets since Labor PM Gough Whitlam and LNP Malcolm Fraser agreed to the UN Lima agreement in 1975 to sacrifice 30% of our industries. The 30% of Aussie jobs to help third-world countries like China prosper! Agreeing to impose every unelected UN agenda onto the Australian people since then! Gosh! 49 years of endemic Politicians and bureaucrats' treason so far, since agreeing to the sly UN Lima agreement in 1975, Labor and the LNP take turns being just UN Puppets, knowing that the UN has also been just puppets for the WEF globalist monsters for half a century! Climate Change? Yes, it does; that is the beauty of the Globalist Monsters using this to control and dominate the governments of all UN Member Countries, knowing that there will never be any proof that the UN is controlling the ever-changing Climate The Dictionary defines TREASON; “Treason” is when a person acts against his/ her country. ... A treasonous person is called a TRAITOR! Outside the field of law, the word "traitor" can be used to describe a person who betrays a group to which he or she belongs!
SLY NEWS .. WHY NOT ASK A SCIENTIST WHO IS NOT COMPROMISED BY FUNDING, INSTEAD OF ASKING THESE UTTERLY C0RRUPT WEF PUPPETS ? THERE IS NO CLIMATE EMERGENCY
Agrre no climate emergency but some want to listen to woke scientist ,I guess they make more money that way. Many scientist have said there is no climate change and not to worry but politician have a different agenda here . We need trees no wind power self igniting windmills that cannot be recycled and are causing more harm then good to us.
Modern nuclear power stations are terrific, and so are Modern Coal power stations. They capture the polluting particulars and give us some CO2 to feed the plants and trees, which in return give us Oxygen. but sadly, Peter Dutton is an unwitting traitor to our nation like all his predecessors back to the bad old Whitlam and Fraser days, being duped by the UN puppets for the WEF. Climate Change is the WEFs wealth redistribution has nothing to do with Climate, 49 years of just being WEF=WHO=UN Puppets since Labor PM Gough Whitlam and LNP Malcolm Fraser agreed to the UN Lima agreement in 1975 to sacrifice 30% of our industries. The 30% of Aussie jobs to help third-world countries like China prosper! Agreeing to impose every unelected UN agenda onto the Australian people since then! Gosh! 49 years of endemic Politicians and bureaucrats' treason so far, since agreeing to the sly UN Lima agreement in 1975, Labor and the LNP take turns being just UN Puppets, knowing that the UN has also been just puppets for the WEF globalist monsters for half a century! Climate Change? Yes, it does; that is the beauty of the Globalist Monsters using this to control and dominate the governments of all UN Member Countries, knowing that there will never be any proof that the UN is controlling the ever-changing Climate The Dictionary defines TREASON; “Treason” is when a person acts against his/ her country. ... A treasonous person is called a TRAITOR! Outside the field of law, the word "traitor" can be used to describe a person who betrays a group to which he or she belongs!
@@footbru Thanks for the question. If a Company builds a Mine, they must pay a Redevelopment Bond, so that if they go broke or just leave once the mine is used up, there is money to redevelop the site. But that is not the case for Solar or Wind farms. If the government gives the go ahead for Overseas investment companies to build Solar or Wind farms on either Commonwealth land or offshore (Ie. East coast NSW) then the Government may be responsible to clean up when those Farms are no longer viable. Check this Video from Senator Malcom Roberts - ruclips.net/video/xEruPi_4bjA/видео.html
@@JeffreyHebard If it's private property, I don't see the problem. You and others are silent when it comes to mine remediation, or offshore oil rig removals, but when it comes to renewables you howl like it's the end of the world that a private landowner is making money from his property. It's like saying that all farms should be punished for not maintaining their sheds. None of your business. As for Crown Land, I'm not aware of any licences onshore, but if there are, the relevant departments need to protect the assets - and I bet they will. Offshore I don't know about. But it's no different from offshore oil rigs. I don't hear you howling about those. Malcolm Roberts is a dick.
@@footbru Sounds like you did not watch the Video and I'm not Howling just pointing out some facts and i agree landowners should be able to make money from their land any legal way they want but as it says in the video some are getting caught with no protection, just watch the video. Also, I did say that Companies that build a Mine, they MUST pay a Redevelopment Bond, so that if they go broke or just leave once the mine is used up, there is money to redevelop the site. But never mind have a great day.
WUPER SCOOPER TROLL M!SSES THE POINT AGAIN & THROWS IN A NON SEQUITUR BS REPLY ,, IF CO2 IS DESTROYING THE PLANET, WHY EXPORT COAL TO THE WORLD'S BIGGEST CO2 EMITTER ? MORE GREEN LEFT WAFFLE & TAIL CHASING - CREATE CO2 TO REDUCE CO2.
@@wuper2270India just produced record number of coal for 2024 and was proud of it. Modi did an x post about it. What's your point ? Why kill ourselves if it makes no difference. Do it reasonably
Talk to Australian university students. Overwhelmingly they complain about the poor standard of tuition due to classes swamped with international students, struggling to understand due to language issues. The quality of our Universities... and education of our future generations... is being trashed by avaricious governing boards, endlessly syphoning foreign cash
...and that means increasing risks of rolling blackouts while Australia waits 20+ years for the first operational reactor and more years to add more reactors, while the remaining ageing and increasingly less reliable coal-fired generators fail, and gas gets increasingly scarcer and more expensive. No energy, no economy. A vote for the Coalition is a vote for blackouts, rising energy costs and civilisation collapse.
Modern nuclear power stations are terrific, and so are Modern Coal power stations. They capture the polluting particulars and give us some CO2 to feed the plants and trees, which in return give us Oxygen. but sadly, Peter Dutton is an unwitting traitor to our nation like all his predecessors back to the bad old Whitlam and Fraser days, being duped by the UN puppets for the WEF. Climate Change is the WEFs wealth redistribution has nothing to do with Climate, 49 years of just being WEF=WHO=UN Puppets since Labor PM Gough Whitlam and LNP Malcolm Fraser agreed to the UN Lima agreement in 1975 to sacrifice 30% of our industries. The 30% of Aussie jobs to help third-world countries like China prosper! Agreeing to impose every unelected UN agenda onto the Australian people since then! Gosh! 49 years of endemic Politicians and bureaucrats' treason so far, since agreeing to the sly UN Lima agreement in 1975, Labor and the LNP take turns being just UN Puppets, knowing that the UN has also been just puppets for the WEF globalist monsters for half a century! Climate Change? Yes, it does; that is the beauty of the Globalist Monsters using this to control and dominate the governments of all UN Member Countries, knowing that there will never be any proof that the UN is controlling the ever-changing Climate The Dictionary defines TREASON; “Treason” is when a person acts against his/ her country. ... A treasonous person is called a TRAITOR! Outside the field of law, the word "traitor" can be used to describe a person who betrays a group to which he or she belongs!
Exactly! Excellent Peter Dutton and David Littleproud for your long-term solutions. Tired of Labor's tokenism and wokeism oppressing Australians. Thank you for treating Mr Dutton with the respect he deserves, unlike your previous interview.
Modern nuclear power stations are terrific, and so are Modern Coal power stations. They capture the polluting particulars and give us some CO2 to feed the plants and trees, which in return give us Oxygen. but sadly, Peter Dutton is an unwitting traitor to our nation like all his predecessors back to the bad old Whitlam and Fraser days, being duped by the UN puppets for the WEF. Climate Change is the WEFs wealth redistribution has nothing to do with Climate, 49 years of just being WEF=WHO=UN Puppets since Labor PM Gough Whitlam and LNP Malcolm Fraser agreed to the UN Lima agreement in 1975 to sacrifice 30% of our industries. The 30% of Aussie jobs to help third-world countries like China prosper! Agreeing to impose every unelected UN agenda onto the Australian people since then! Gosh! 49 years of endemic Politicians and bureaucrats' treason so far, since agreeing to the sly UN Lima agreement in 1975, Labor and the LNP take turns being just UN Puppets, knowing that the UN has also been just puppets for the WEF globalist monsters for half a century! Climate Change? Yes, it does; that is the beauty of the Globalist Monsters using this to control and dominate the governments of all UN Member Countries, knowing that there will never be any proof that the UN is controlling the ever-changing Climate The Dictionary defines TREASON; “Treason” is when a person acts against his/ her country. ... A treasonous person is called a TRAITOR! Outside the field of law, the word "traitor" can be used to describe a person who betrays a group to which he or she belongs!
China has two & has just committed to another 11 latest thorium reactors to build in next 5 years. China has around 90 reactors with another 150 projected by 2035, they also have 3080 coal fired power stations with another two built each week. There has been new recent rumours that the Three Gorges Dam is finally failing.
Modern nuclear power stations are terrific, and so are Modern Coal power stations. They capture the polluting particulars and give us some CO2 to feed the plants and trees, which in return give us Oxygen. but sadly, Peter Dutton is an unwitting traitor to our nation like all his predecessors back to the bad old Whitlam and Fraser days, being duped by the UN puppets for the WEF. Climate Change is the WEFs wealth redistribution has nothing to do with Climate, 49 years of just being WEF=WHO=UN Puppets since Labor PM Gough Whitlam and LNP Malcolm Fraser agreed to the UN Lima agreement in 1975 to sacrifice 30% of our industries. The 30% of Aussie jobs to help third-world countries like China prosper! Agreeing to impose every unelected UN agenda onto the Australian people since then! Gosh! 49 years of endemic Politicians and bureaucrats' treason so far, since agreeing to the sly UN Lima agreement in 1975, Labor and the LNP take turns being just UN Puppets, knowing that the UN has also been just puppets for the WEF globalist monsters for half a century! Climate Change? Yes, it does; that is the beauty of the Globalist Monsters using this to control and dominate the governments of all UN Member Countries, knowing that there will never be any proof that the UN is controlling the ever-changing Climate The Dictionary defines TREASON; “Treason” is when a person acts against his/ her country. ... A treasonous person is called a TRAITOR! Outside the field of law, the word "traitor" can be used to describe a person who betrays a group to which he or she belongs!
Flip flopping Albo is not the answer and the amount of flights he took all over the world and his entourage contributed tonnes of emissions to the planet!
What would keep the 'lights on' in Australia while we wait 20+ years (NOT 10-12 years that the Coalition are promising) for any prospective nuclear generator units to become operational? It seems to me pro-nuclear ideologues never answer this inconvenient question. That's the conversation Australia needs to have. No energy, no economy. A vote for the Coalition is a vote for blackouts, rising energy costs and civilisation collapse.
@@polarbear7255 - "Coal will have to stay on the grid anyway to back up wind and solar." Australia doesn't have 20+ years to wait for the first prospective nuclear generator to become operational. Coal-fired power in Australia is becoming increasingly unreliable and increasingly more expensive to run. Most states on Australia’s main grid experienced a significant jump in wholesale electricity prices in the June 2024 quarter, as record demand driven by cold weather, and a combination of coal outages, and lower wind and hydro output caused a greater reliance on gas, the country’s most expensive power technology. The worst affected state was NSW, which plays host to the biggest grid and the largest fleet of coal fired power generators, which experienced a three fold increase in the number of “baseload” plant failures. Very few coal-fired generator units around the world are still operational beyond 50 years. The more renewables there are in the electricity grid system the less economically viable coal-fired plants become. AEMO's expected closures of coal-fired generator units in NEM (assumed use-by date range 40-50 years after commissioning): Site Name (state) _ _ Capacity (MW) _ Use-by Date Range _ _Expected closure year Eraring (NSW): _ _ _ _ _ 4x 720 _ _ _ _ _ _ 2022 - 2034 _ _ _ _ _ 2027 (possibly 2029) Callide B (QLD): _ _ _ _ 2x 350 _ _ _ _ _ _ 2028 - 2038 _ _ _ _ _ 2028 Yallourn W (VIC): _ 2x 360 + 2x 380 _ _ _ 2013 - 2034 _ _ _ _ _ 2028 Vales Point B (NSW): _2x 660 _ _ _ _ _ _ _2018 - 2028 _ _ _ _ _ 2033 Bayswater (NSW): _ _ _4x 660 _ _ _ _ _ _ _2025 - 2036 _ _ _ _ _ 2033 Gladstone (QLD): _ _ _ _6x 280 _ _ _ _ _ _ 2016 - 2026 _ _ _ _ _ 2035 Loy Yang A (VIC): _ 3x 560 + 1x 530 _ _ _ 2024 - 2038 _ _ _ _ _ 2035 Tarong (QLD): _ _ _ _ _ _4x 350 _ _ _ _ _ _ 2024 - 2036 _ _ _ _ _ 2037 Mt Piper (NSW): _ _ _ _ _2x 730 _ _ _ _ _ _2032 - 2043 _ _ _ _ _ 2040 Kogan Creek (QLD): _ _ _1x 750 _ _ _ _ _ _2047 - 2057 _ _ _ _ _ 2042 Stanwell (QLD): _ _ _ _ _ _4x 635 _ _ _ _ _ 2033 - 2046 _ _ _ _ _ 2043-46 Loy Yang B (VIC): _ _ _ _ 2x 535 _ _ _ _ _ _2033 - 2046 _ _ _ _ _ 2046 Millmerran (QLD): _ _ _ _ 2x 440 _ _ _ _ _ _2042 - 2052 _ _ _ _ _ 2051 Callide C (QLD): _ _ _ _ _ 2x 460 _ _ _ _ _ _ 2041 - 2051 _ _ _ _ _ Not Disclosed And the existing coal mines supplying some of these coal fired generators also have limited lives. Some coal mines are due to close within this decade and more in the 2030s. And the eastern and central states of Australia have less than 2 decades of 2P gas reserves remaining at current production rate. I'd suggest our current energy security situation has been decades in the making by a succession of poor energy policies by both the Coalition and Labor governments at state and federal jurisdictions. A vote for the Coalition is a vote for blackouts, rising energy prices and civilisation collapse. Nuclear technologies are too slow to deploy to save us!
Modern nuclear power stations are terrific, and so are Modern Coal power stations. They capture the polluting particulars and give us some CO2 to feed the plants and trees, which in return provide us with Oxygen. Sadly, Peter Dutton is an unwitting traitor to our nation, like all his predecessors back in the bad old Whitlam and Fraser days, who were duped by the UN puppets for the WEF. Climate Change is the WEFs wealth redistribution has nothing to do with Climate, 49 years of just being WEF=WHO=UN Puppets since Labor PM Gough Whitlam and LNP Malcolm Fraser agreed to the UN Lima agreement in 1975 to sacrifice 30% of our industries. The 30% of Aussie jobs to help third-world countries like China prosper! Agreeing to impose every unelected UN agenda onto the Australian people since then! Gosh! 49 years of endemic Politicians and bureaucrats' treason so far, since agreeing to the sly UN Lima agreement in 1975, Labor and the LNP take turns being just UN Puppets, knowing that the UN has also been just puppets for the WEF globalist monsters for half a century! Climate Change? Yes, it does; that is the beauty of the Globalist Monsters using this to control and dominate the governments of all UN Member Countries, knowing that there will never be any proof that the UN is controlling the ever-changing Climate The Dictionary defines TREASON; “Treason” is when a person acts against his/ her country. ... A treasonous person is called a TRAITOR! Outside the field of law, the word "traitor" can be used to describe a person who betrays a group to which he or she belongs!
Modern nuclear power stations are terrific, as are Modern Coal power stations. They capture the polluting particulars and give us some CO2 to feed the plants and trees, giving us Oxygen. Sadly, Peter Dutton is an unwitting traitor to our nation, like all his predecessors back in the bad old Whitlam and Fraser days, who were duped by the UN puppets for the WEF. Climate Change is the WEFs wealth redistribution has nothing to do with Climate, 49 years of just being WEF=WHO=UN Puppets since Labor PM Gough Whitlam and LNP Malcolm Fraser agreed to the UN Lima agreement in 1975 to sacrifice 30% of our industries. The 30% of Aussie jobs to help third-world countries like China prosper! Agreeing to impose every unelected UN agenda onto the Australian people since then! Gosh! 49 years of endemic Politicians and bureaucrats' treason so far, since agreeing to the sly UN Lima agreement in 1975, Labor and the LNP take turns being just UN Puppets, knowing that the UN has also been just puppets for the WEF globalist monsters for half a century! Climate Change? Yes, it does; that is the beauty of the Globalist Monsters using this to control and dominate the governments of all UN Member Countries, knowing that there will never be any proof that the UN is controlling the ever-changing Climate The Dictionary defines TREASON; “Treason” is when a person acts against his/ her country. ... A treasonous person is called a TRAITOR! Outside the field of law, the word "traitor" can be used to describe a person who betrays a group to which he or she belongs!
I used to be a leftie, I couldn't stand this guy. Then COVID hit and the disgraceful Orwellian response changed me into a libertarian. Now I think this guy is a good, genuine man
As a small scale miner its absolutely ridiculous the red tape involved to register even a small 100x300m lease. No room for us little fellas anymore. Bloody grubs.
Australians need to hear and see this discussion. Australians need to vote the coalition back in to put the country back on track Australia is going in the wrong direction under labour..I think politicians can obscure the truth but Peter Dutton does come across as a man with integrity he is in the same class as John Howard and Tony Abbot he will make a great prime minister….
Refreshing to hear a sensible politician, not say that Peter Dutton is all correct, however let him have a debate with Albosleezy and the Australian public will kick him out very quickly
Exactly. A 2014 Report by Dr. Vanessa Haverd of the CSIRO, Oceanic & Atmospheric Research Division demonstrated that Australia emitted 485 million tons of Co2 Per Year, and at the same time ABSORBED 2.2 BILLION Tons of Co2 Per Year. Since that time our Co2 emissions have reduced by a further 20% so we now ABSORB 6 TIMES MORE than we emit ALREADY.
Agree with his nuclear energy stance but saying cost of living measures drives inflation is such a bull. He should blame russia's war and australia's economy reliance to china.
Queensland owner our power stations and grids and its recommended that other states follow suite. This is helpful w you deliver cheaper electricity bills
One only has to make themselves wise to what has happened in Germany with the massive PV solar and wind deployment and unfortunately blissfully we are making the same mistake. The problem that the Germans have found was the renewables are dependent on the whims of the weather. On the other hand the demand of electricity is also variable, but this variability does not coincide with the weather. This means that there will also be gaps between the renewable energy generated and the demand. To fill this difference energy has to come from somewhere and the reality is that batteries and pumped hydro cannot do this alone. This means that at least gas (that can be turned on and off quickly) needs to be available to the FULL DEMAND capacity simply because the dark-lulls or the wind-droughts and prolonged cloudy days can bring the renewables to its knees where nothing is produced. The cost of renewables will not only get higher with time, not because the panels may be cheap, but the entire infrastructure needs to be renewed every 20 years or so and there needs to be a massive overbuild to cover the vagaries of the weather. This means that operational efficiency of renewables is 30-40% at best and gas standby will be called into service whenever there are renewable/demand incompatibilities. As the renewable penetration is increased, so will the peakiness of the renewables which means that during the summer if the sun shines and the wind blows, there may be a glut of energy produced while the demand during those times might not need all the energy generated. This means that energy shedding or load shedding needs to be invoked and those with PV rooftop installations will most likely be subjected to a negative feed-in tariff which means that this might be seen as a 'solar tax'. The Germans have discovered the problems outlined above so what is being done? Because, as is the case in Australia, ideology overrides engineering and economic commonsense and for this reasons the Germans are still resisting nuclear and gas. The difference is that Germany will be able to fill the gaps from the French nuclear power that is expanding at a very high price to the consumer. Australia might not have a similar option.
Net zero is just fashion and should be treated as such..fashion changes daily but unfortunately politicians jump on the band waggon and by the time they get up and running to be fashionable its over.but the politicians run with it x 10.the point is stop following the flavour of the month and concentrate on running the country.
And those growing plants release OXYGEN in daylight. Yes! Oxygen! Therefore higher CO2 emissions leads to more plant growth & more oxygen released. (Google oxygen and its source)
Yet no end of life cleanup requirements on Wind or Solar factories - they should have to put 20% of their project cost into trust for making the place the same as it was prior to starting. Should be similar to mining not sure their bonds.
I simply don't understand why this is a problem - like asking someone who builds a house "who's gonna clean up when you demolish it". A rubbish argument - pun intended. Simply another person making a mountain out of less than a molehill.
@@footbru Well a house site will be the person to buy it but probably for these renewable project the government will most likely pick up the tab and thus tax payer for government approving the implementations. That's why you see these renewables projects expecting the government to pay for transmission lines - surely the project could pay for it? A person buying a remote land parcel has to do such to get grid power. As for a house if it's in decent nick and in a state it can be removed on stumps wood frame a house removalist company may take it perhaps make some coin to pay for remaining cleanup. If your statement were valid then why expect mining/gas/oil companies are expected to pay for cleanup? After all a bloody big hole makes for a grand swimming pool and a potentially toxic spa next door is a bonus. I heard there's even talk about toxic chemicals coming off these renewables now but that's probably the molehill.
@@rw-xf4cb You are trying to make an argument out of nothing. It's none of your business what a landowner does with his property. Why would a government get involved in remediation of private property? And mining companies have been walking away from sites leaving from toxic legacies for decades - do you complain that mining companies should be prevented from mining?
Mines have been synonymous with economic growth around NSW for over a century. However as these mines reach the end of their shelf life most are simply locked up and left to continue to pollute our river systems. Who cleans up the mess? Apparently no one. See the RUclips video titled 𝗠𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗕𝗹𝘂𝗲 𝗠𝗼𝘂𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘀 - 𝗔 𝗗𝗼𝗰𝘂𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘆, published 23 Feb 2022, duration 26 minutes. Why is it you seem worried about only the clean up of solar and wind farms, but apparently not about the ongoing damage/pollution actually happening from the consequences of mining activities?
There is offshore GAS reservoir off the coast of NSW, that would allow the east coast of Australia to safely support the current needs until nuclear reactors can be constructed to support base load production
Greg priestley - "There is offshore GAS reservoir off the coast of NSW..." Where's your evidence/data? Australia's east coast gas reserves are inadequate to last decades at the current consumption rate. A quick look at the AEMO’s 𝘎𝘢𝘴 𝘚𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘖𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘦𝘴 - 𝘔𝘢𝘳𝘤𝘩 2024: 𝘍𝘰𝘳 𝘈𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘢’𝘴 𝘌𝘢𝘴𝘵 𝘊𝘰𝘢𝘴𝘵 𝘎𝘢𝘴 𝘔𝘢𝘳𝘬𝘦𝘵 document shows in Figure 26 (on page 47): 𝗞𝗲𝘆 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮: • 2023 actual consumption: _ _ _ 1,885 PJ • 2P developed reserves: _ _ _ _ 17,640 PJ _ _ 𝗥/𝗣 = 𝟵.𝟰 𝘆𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘀; plus • 2P undeveloped reserves: _ _ _16,279 PJ _ _ 𝗥/𝗣 = 𝟴.𝟲 𝘆𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘀 • 2C resources: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 41,938 PJ ...as at 31 Dec 2023. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝟮𝗣 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗲𝘀 𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲 reflects statistically that there should be 𝗮𝘁 𝗹𝗲𝗮𝘀𝘁 𝗮 𝟱𝟬% 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗮𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 that the quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed the sum of estimated proved plus probable reserves. 𝗚𝗮𝘀 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗱𝗲𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗱 𝗮𝘀 𝗹𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗰𝗲𝗿𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗻, & potentially less commercially viable, sources of gas. When estimating these uncertain resources, the best estimate of contingent resources (2C) is used. Figure 27 shows a large majority of the 2P reserves and 2C resources are concentrated in the north. Northern LNG producers control around 70% of the 2P developed and undeveloped reserves in the ECGM. Gas is only going to get scarcer and less affordable. I'd suggest it means increasing risks of rolling blackouts while Australia waits 20+ years for the first operational reactor and more years to add more reactors, while the remaining ageing and increasingly less reliable coal-fired generators fail, and gas gets increasingly scarcer and more expensive. No energy, no economy. A vote for the Coalition is a vote for blackouts, rising energy costs and civilisation collapse. Most, if not all ageing, increasingly unreliable and increasingly more expensive to run coal-fired generators will be closed by 2038. What would keep the 'lights on' in Australia while we wait 20+ years (NOT 10-12 years that the Coalition are promising) for any prospective nuclear generator units to become operational? It seems to me pro-nuclear ideologues never answer this inconvenient question. That's the conversation Australia needs to have. Overwhelming evidence/data indicates that nuclear technologies: 𝟭. 𝗔𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗼𝗼 𝘀𝗹𝗼𝘄 𝘁𝗼 𝗱𝗲𝗽𝗹𝗼𝘆 (likely mid-2040s at the earliest for any possible operational nuclear reactor(s) in Australia); 𝟮. 𝗔𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗼𝗼 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗶𝘃𝗲 (almost double to six times the cost of ‘firmed’ renewables, per 𝘎𝘦𝘯𝘊𝘰𝘴𝘵 2023-24, Lazard’s LCOE v17); 𝟯. 𝗨𝘀𝗲 𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲 𝗳𝘂𝗲𝗹𝘀 𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗾𝘂𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝘀𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗻 𝗹𝗼𝗻𝗴-𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗺 𝗮 𝘀𝗼-𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗱 “𝗻𝘂𝗰𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗮𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲” (see the Energy Watch Group’s 2013 report titled 𝘍𝘰𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘭 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘕𝘶𝘤𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘍𝘶𝘦𝘭𝘴 - 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘶𝘱𝘱𝘭𝘺 𝘖𝘶𝘵𝘭𝘰𝘰𝘬, Figure 113: Historic and possible future development of uranium production and demand); and 𝟰. 𝗟𝗲𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗱 𝗮 𝘁𝗼𝘅𝗶𝗰 𝘄𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲 𝗹𝗲𝗴𝗮𝗰𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗹𝗼𝗻𝗴 𝗼𝘂𝘁𝗹𝗮𝘀𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝘆 𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗴𝘆 𝗯𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗳𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝗴𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗱 (an intergenerational issue).
Australia is practically floating on a big pool of gas, we could use less than we give away without payment to power Australia, clean, efficient, local, cheap/free, scalable & reliable gas.
@@landcruiser11rum You make up fantasies. Gas is only going to get scarcer and more expensive. The era of global cheap petroleum oil and fossil methane gas supplies has ended. US petroleum geologist Art Berman was in conversation with Johan Landgren in the RUclips video titled 𝗔𝗿𝘁𝗵𝘂𝗿 𝗕𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗻: 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗣𝗲𝗿𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗘𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗴𝘆 𝗦𝘁𝗼𝗿𝗺 - 𝗣𝗲𝗮𝗸 𝗖𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗽 𝗢𝗶𝗹 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗡𝗮𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗚𝗮𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲, published 16 Feb 2024, duration 55 minutes. On when the US shale gas decline is likely, Art Berman said (from around the 37¼ minute mark): "𝘐’𝘮 𝘲𝘶𝘪𝘵𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘧𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘣𝘦𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘢𝘥𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘸𝘦’𝘳𝘦 𝘨𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘦𝘦 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘱𝘭𝘺 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘴 𝘣𝘺 𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘬𝘦𝘵𝘴 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘣𝘰𝘵𝘩 𝘰𝘪𝘭 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘢𝘭 𝘨𝘢𝘴, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘵 𝘸𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘴𝘶𝘳𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘦 𝘮𝘦 𝘪𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘩𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘢 𝘺𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘸𝘰, 𝘢𝘩, 𝘢𝘴 𝘰𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰, 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘰𝘳 𝘴𝘪𝘹 𝘺𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘸𝘦 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘢𝘥𝘦." ruclips.net/video/rv85LTMO8TQ/видео.html It seems we won’t need to wait long to see whether Art Berman’s expectations are correct, or not.
@@actualfacts1055 OK, thanks. Unfortunate. AEMO said it - I hope there is a renewable alternative. I guess Dutton's plan will need something like this as well, since he only plans to build 38 GW of nukes, and they can't all run, all the time. So maybe 33 or 35GW at peak. "Opposition energy spokesman Ted O’Brien has promised to release a gas policy before the election. He was contacted for comment. Not everyone agrees that more gas is needed. Renewable and climate advocates argue that pumped hydro dams coupled with batteries can provide the storage needed to back up renewables, coupled with policies to reduce energy demand with increased energy efficiency." - from SMH
@@actualfacts1055 I replied earlier, but YT blocked it - trying again OK, thanks. Unfortunate. AEMO said it - I hope there is a renewable alternative. I guess Dutton's plan will need something like this as well, since he only plans to build 38 GW of nukes, and they can't all run at 100%, all the time. So maybe 33 or 35GW at peak. Actually, now that I think about it, it's six plants on the east coast, and one isolated plant in WA. So that's 27 or 28 GW peak. What does WA do if their nuclear reactor needs to have maintenance?? You can't have just one, disconnected from all other forms of generation? "Opposition energy spokesman Ted O’Brien has promised to release a gas policy before the election. He was contacted for comment. Not everyone agrees that more gas is needed. Renewable and climate advocates argue that pumped hydro dams coupled with batteries can provide the storage needed to back up renewables, coupled with policies to reduce energy demand with increased energy efficiency." - from SMH
Omg living in the past as usual here on the thinking man’s channel 😂 already Australia and most countries around the world surpassing expectations on renewable energy…. In 2 years most countries will be well over 50% renewables.
Yes Peter and who was in government when the government decided that we didn’t need an Australian car industry? Why hasn’t any government removed the luxury car taxes?
"net zero" Australia is already carbon negative, the only country in the world that stores more carbon than it produces. We don't need to do ANYTHING we've already achieved net zero and indeed net negative!
Give us a plan Dutton with all the details so we can make our own mind up. It's no good just talking about how good it all will be, we need answers to a lot of questions. As long as they are not forthcoming the LNP does mot deserve to be in government. Whether you agree with the view of Labor or not, at least they make it very clear where they stand.
I partly agree. All parties need to be more transparent with their energy proposals. The longer we keep back flipping the higher costs get. Labor has pretended to have the answers but has instead fallen short on delivery. Tough calls need to be made with energy and housing. Who will step up?
@@DavidLloyd187 100% agree. We don't have any costings at all from the current government or an economic and long-term infrastructure overview. So, what land will be used for renewables? What's the firming power? What type of electricity storage will we need? How much will that cost, and where will it be located? The current governments energy policy seems to be adhoc with an attitude of let's cross that bridge when we come to it, but I think to transition the whole nation will need a structured, planned, and possibly a staggered approach. I'd like to be able to compare policies side by side.
Labor's plan is to rely on free enterprise. Dutton's plan is almost communist - government to pay and force state and local governments to comply. Local communities will have no say. From what we know of Dutton's "plan" - so little detail so far.
So what’s the plan then Peter? How are you going to deliver this without sending the country bankrupt and within a reasonable timeframe that isn’t beyond the average Australian’s natural lifespan? Or wasn’t there enough room on the back of that paper napkin to work out those details? 🤓🥔☢
What's unviable is that a government is voted in to run the country and is set upon by the unelected opposition on any minor detail, my slant is if opposition have better ideas put them on the table with some comitment and detail. The issue is the opposition seems to be wanting full control of the running of the country, on someones behalf? The building of a sustainable energy infrastructure is in the public interest . A farmer having the right to cut down a tree for fence post doesn't help the fence post seller. If the Farmer is on crown land the trees are not his!
@@vernonwhite4660 The timber on crown land and reserves is managed by the state government. In 2011 the labour party commited to banning wood fires in city centres as a wood fire releases in 2hrs the same amouny of carbon as an average car does in a year. LNP got in and rolled all that back as well as the carbon taxes that would now be funding renewables. Good old head in the sand LNP.
I would vote for Peter but I fear he could just be another WEF puppet, what's his thoughts on , digital ID, Vaccine mandates, WHO treaty etc, that's what i want to know.
That is a worry, I believe he is WEF, he did go with the digital ID when Labor snuck it through just after their pathetic budget. Not sure about the others, hmmm.
The price of gas sets the marginal price of electricity, it has nothing to do with renewable energy. We pay the max price for gas even higher than we sell our Gas to China for. The Chinese on-sell our gas and make a profit. If gas price is forced down for domestic consumers, energy/electricity prices will drop. The push for Nukes is just stalling so more coal can be used in conventional stations. the problem is that Australia will be bypassed by technological advances and the half-built nukes will end up as stranded assets before they are even finished. Renewables can and will be the primary source of energy in the future, however, this won't happen overnight and a transition strategy is required. We don't need more gas we have more than enough, the only reason to drill for more gas is to increase the exploitation of Australians and allow foreign-owned companies to export even more while paying next to zero tax, and keeping East Coast prices sky-high again Dutton needs to work in Australian's interest, not for foreign companies - the more gas thing is just gaslighting on steroids. Dutton really needs to talk to a few actual experts instead of his groupthink mates because he got so much wrong it isn't even funny. Albo is history the worst PM ever, so Dutton likely will win the election as long as he keeps breathing and he needs to get it right and cut the gaslighting and cut the extreme favouritism of selected mates and start talking to a board church - otherwise, he will be another one-term blunder like Albo- who are these farmers who need to put two D7 with chains though for even more land clearing/stripping are they Chinese owned cattle farmers or GR owned properties or even ME owned farming interests. let's see names and what they are asking to do first.
@woodliceworm4565 - "The price of gas sets the marginal price of electricity, it has nothing to do with renewable energy." Yep, and data I see indicates global supplies of fossil methane gas are only going to get scarcer and more expensive. US petroleum geologist Art Berman was in conversation with Johan Landgren in the RUclips video titled 𝗔𝗿𝘁𝗵𝘂𝗿 𝗕𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗻: 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗣𝗲𝗿𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗘𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗴𝘆 𝗦𝘁𝗼𝗿𝗺 - 𝗣𝗲𝗮𝗸 𝗖𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗽 𝗢𝗶𝗹 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗡𝗮𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗚𝗮𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲, published 16 Feb 2024, duration 55 minutes. On when the US shale gas decline is likely, Art Berman said (from around the 37¼ minute mark): "𝘐’𝘮 𝘲𝘶𝘪𝘵𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘧𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘣𝘦𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘢𝘥𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘸𝘦’𝘳𝘦 𝘨𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘦𝘦 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘱𝘭𝘺 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘴 𝘣𝘺 𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘬𝘦𝘵𝘴 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘣𝘰𝘵𝘩 𝘰𝘪𝘭 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘢𝘭 𝘨𝘢𝘴, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘵 𝘸𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘴𝘶𝘳𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘦 𝘮𝘦 𝘪𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘩𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘢 𝘺𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘸𝘰, 𝘢𝘩, 𝘢𝘴 𝘰𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰, 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘰𝘳 𝘴𝘪𝘹 𝘺𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘸𝘦 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘢𝘥𝘦." ruclips.net/video/rv85LTMO8TQ/видео.html It seems we won’t need to wait long to see whether Art Berman’s expectations are correct, or not. A vote for the Coalition is a vote for blackouts, rising energy costs and civilisation collapse.
Roof top solar plus batteries for all homes would immediately cut family power bills. Extreme weather is happening now. We can't wait to start action sometime in the future.
What Dutton means is Australia MIGHT not reach net zero by 2050. However net zero is only a goal - the main thing is trying to a achieve a reduction in carbon emissions. Are nuclear emissions less damaging. When Chernobyl happened, by sister-in-law in Germany was pleased to tell me the radioactive pollution would also reach the southern hemisphere.
The Laws of Physics are not negotiable. Net zero by 2050 is already far, far too late! Earth had the two hottest days on record and the weather is acting like it. ruclips.net/video/e5babdQYKV8/видео.html The global mean surface temperature (GMST) anomaly is currently about +1.3 °C (30-year mean) relative to the 1850-1900 baseline. The GMST anomaly will inevitably breach the +1.5 °C (30-year mean) threshold, and that's likely sometime around 2030, perhaps as early as 2028, or perhaps as late as 2036. And the GMST anomaly is currently on a trajectory to breach the +2.0 °C (30-year mean) threshold likely sometime in the 2040s, maybe as late as 2062. At +1.5 °C (30-year mean) threshold, the scientific community warn that 70-90% of coral reefs globally would be destroyed, and only 1% would remain once +2.0 °C (30-year mean) threshold was reached. Meanwhile, leading Australian climate scientist Dr Joëlle Gergis takes a timely look at Australia's perilous future in a warming world, recorded at an event at Gleebooks in Sydney on Tuesday, 4 Jun 2024. "𝘔𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘈𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘯'𝘵 𝘢𝘸𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘩𝘰𝘸 𝘣𝘢𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘩𝘰𝘸 𝘮𝘶𝘤𝘩 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘴𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘨𝘦𝘵." - Dr Joëlle Gergis Hear the ABC RN podcast titled 𝗛𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘄𝗮𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝗛𝗲𝗹𝗹 - 𝗝𝗼𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗲 𝗚𝗲𝗿𝗴𝗶𝘀 𝗼𝗻 𝗰𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗔𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗹𝗶𝗮’𝘀 𝗳𝘂𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲, published 25 Jun 2024, duration 52 minutes. I'd suggest extending the life of coal and gas fired power stations means increasing risks of rolling blackouts while Australia waits 20+ years for the first operational reactor and more years to add more reactors, while the remaining ageing and increasingly less reliable coal-fired generators fail, and gas gets increasingly scarcer and more expensive. No energy, no economy. A vote for the Coalition is a vote for blackouts, rising energy costs and civilisation collapse.
So why are atmospheric CO₂ concentrations still rising if "We are already at net zero"? See the RUclips video titled 𝗖𝗮𝗿𝗯𝗼𝗻 𝗱𝗶𝗼𝘅𝗶𝗱𝗲 𝗽𝘂𝗺𝗽𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗹𝗲 - 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟮, showing the history of atmospheric CO₂, from 800,000 years ago until January 2022. ruclips.net/video/I7jKxO4nKZc/видео.html Per the latest data from NOAA, the global average atmospheric CO₂ concentrations were at: May 2023: 420.52 ppm May 2024: 423.43 ppm Earth had the two hottest days on record and the weather is acting like it. ruclips.net/video/e5babdQYKV8/видео.html @phyrexian8610 - "Carbon Dioxide feeds plants." Atmospheric CO₂ concentrations also traps more heat. Increasing heat eventually kills plants and animals (including humans). Leading Australian climate scientist Dr Joëlle Gergis takes a timely look at Australia's perilous future in a warming world, recorded at an event at Gleebooks in Sydney on Tuesday, 4 Jun 2024. "𝘔𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘈𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘯'𝘵 𝘢𝘸𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘩𝘰𝘸 𝘣𝘢𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘩𝘰𝘸 𝘮𝘶𝘤𝘩 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘴𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘨𝘦𝘵." - Dr Joëlle Gergis Hear the ABC RN podcast titled 𝗛𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘄𝗮𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝗛𝗲𝗹𝗹 - 𝗝𝗼𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗲 𝗚𝗲𝗿𝗴𝗶𝘀 𝗼𝗻 𝗰𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗔𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗹𝗶𝗮’𝘀 𝗳𝘂𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲, published 25 Jun 2024, duration 52 minutes.
Yes. Dr. Vanessa Havard of the CSIRO Oceanic and Atmospheric Research Division in her 2014 Report, demonstrated that our emissions were 485 Million Tons of Co2 Per Year and our ABSORBTION was 2.2 BILLION tons of Co2 Per Year. We have further reduced our emissions by 20% since that time. All the pain that both state and Federal Governments impose on Australians is DISGUSTING for a false "NetZero" narrative. China opens a new Coal fired Power Station EVERY WEEK. THAT is where the worlds Co2 difficulties emanate.
the only 'net zero' should be to do with immigration.
Spot on
We are full
Especially from the middle east...
@@EdBenji No China and India too!
Absolutely to begin with, then red tape, which is put on farmers. Mr Dutton had said it as it is. Double standards everywhere. Our power is getting worse. We could never imagined this mess we are in. 😮
No country can ever or will ever reach net zero. It’s ridiculous to think it can be done.
They can if they tax the crap out of us to buy some made up magical global carbon credits
It laughable, it a bad bed time story at its best
Totally agree with you .
We are already at net zero. Net zero is when you have enough trees to deal with the carbon being produced. Carbon Dioxide feeds plants.
@@phyrexian8610
Ummm… Not even close.
Please vote Albanese out!
That also means Teals and greens
Agree
I voted for labour cuz many of my mates are labour but after they supported Hamas and Gaza. 🙏 thank you and thanks again for nothing.
@@rjclue2630. ALBANESE is a Lying Racist Communist Coward……DESTROY THE LABOR PARTY….
Don't just "get out and vote" make informed votes. ❤
Common sense has a tone all of it's own. Like the man says , we can't afford another year of this government let alone 3. Everything this Labor mob has touched has turned to shit.
Why can't others see the logic? Dutton making sense.
Everything ANY govt touches has turned to shit. 2021 was made by libs.
THE LABOR GOVERNMENT HAS TO GO PERMANENTLY!!!
They are clearly not renewable.
Like your oxygen supply 😵👋.
I think the Labour government has played their woke socialist card, will have to reinvent themselves I think.
Have to agree, they are stealing oxygen.
ONE NATION SHOLD BE THE REAL OPERSITION.
If Australia achieved net zero tomorrow by how many degC will the planet cool in the next 50 years. Keep in mind that China’s annual increase of emissions is greater than Australia’s total annual emissions.
Virtually nothing but that doesn't phase Bowen and other 12 year olds.
The ocen is the same depth when I was a kid in the 60s. Al Gore, We will all be underwater by 2015.
Australia is ALREADY BETTER than "NetZero". A 2014 Report by Dr. Vanessa Haverd, demonstrated that whilst Australia emitted 485 million Tons of Co2 Per Year, we also ABSORBED 2.2 BILLION, that is BILLION, Tons Per year. Since that time Australia has reduced its Co2 emissions by close to 20% so we currently ABSORB 6 TIMES MORE Co2 than we emit. By comparison, China opens a new Coal Fired Power Station EVERY WEEK to provide cheap energy so they can produce goods more cost effectively than their competitors, who are forced to use "renewables" to satisfy the "woke" brigade. So, every time we make Australian energy more expensive than China, we EXPORT manufacturing jobs.
@@darrylweidenhofer Al Gore's lies were the reason they switched from 'global warming' to 'climate change'. Climate change can be used to fear monger any naturally occurring weather event.
Not just China, but they are the biggest. Anyway, it's a scam. Nuclear is our best way forward and China is already building their nuclear power stations. Even the UAE has a nuclear station and how did they make their money?
Albo has achieved Net Zero, he has nothing left to give Australia.
Except for more immigrants that cannot speak English and line up for Welfare payments!
Reinstate the coal industry... cheap proven reliable job investing working policy.
Coal is the original renewable, albeit the longest renewable
And who will buy this coal ?.
@@damo7228China buys it!
@@damo7228 The Australian people will benefit... cheaper energy bills resulting in cost reduction on all primary industries trickling down to the Australian consumers cost of living.
We are already the fourth largest coal producing country in the world lol
net zero nonsense, use coal.
Agree
Dutton 2025. Never vote labour in ever again
Since 2021 never vote libs again.
Quite refreshiing to hear a clear truthful conversation from the likes of Peter Dutton.
Peter, you have clearly stated 👏 lessons to you is lessons to PM Peter Dutton, who will bring Australia economy back home
well done, mate
GO!! Peter Dutton. 👏 👏 👏 👏
He is an equally big dbag as albo
He's just the same, energy prices will still increase with nuclear
Agree
And go Pauline ONE NATION ❤❤
@davidbell6164 not necessarily! It is the old supply and demand argument. Nuclear will produce constant 24-7 electricity, prices have only gone up because supply has been strangled by cultist renewable energy policy.
No one will ever reach net zero.
Albo and Bowen have achieved net zero. Between their ears.
They call home ownership the Australian dream, because you have to be asleep to believe it..
Back post war there was no way working class people would ever afford a home, it only became the Aussie dream later
🤣 true
Unless you’re black rock,vanguard and that other one… oh and our superfunds… welcome to socialism through coporatization… which if you go by definition is actually fascism… brought to you by the “anitfascists” we are living in a circus being led by clowns…
Night time: No wind so no turbines, and it's dark, no solar. How will Labor generate electricity into the grid?
Bicycle or mice you're choice.
COME ON PEOPLE,
THERE IS NO “ ZERO “
ANYWHERE IN THE UNIVERSE !
THERE IS ONLY SENSIBLE, AND
CONSIDERED SMART AND
SENSIBLE EVOLUTION !
NOT POLITICS WITHOUT,
OBLIGATION TO THE PEOPLE ! ! !
Modern nuclear power stations are terrific, as are Modern Coal power stations. They capture the polluting particulars and give us some CO2 to feed the plants and trees, giving us Oxygen.
Sadly, Peter Dutton is an unwitting traitor to our nation, like all his predecessors back in the bad old Whitlam and Fraser days, who were duped by the UN puppets for the WEF. Climate Change is the WEFs wealth redistribution has nothing to do with Climate,
49 years of just being WEF=WHO=UN Puppets since Labor PM Gough Whitlam and LNP Malcolm Fraser agreed to the UN Lima agreement in 1975 to sacrifice 30% of our industries. The 30% of Aussie jobs to help third-world countries like China prosper! Agreeing to impose every unelected UN agenda onto the Australian people since then!
Gosh! 49 years of endemic Politicians and bureaucrats' treason so far, since agreeing to the sly UN Lima agreement in 1975, Labor and the LNP take turns being just UN Puppets, knowing that the UN has also been just puppets for the WEF globalist monsters for half a century!
Climate Change? Yes, it does; that is the beauty of the Globalist Monsters using this to control and dominate the governments of all UN Member Countries, knowing that there will never be any proof that the UN is controlling the ever-changing Climate
The Dictionary defines TREASON; “Treason” is when a person acts against his/ her country. ... A treasonous person is called a TRAITOR! Outside the field of law, the word "traitor" can be used to describe a person who betrays a group to which he or she belongs!
Dutton for PM 🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺
SLY NEWS .. WHY NOT ASK A SCIENTIST WHO IS NOT COMPROMISED BY FUNDING, INSTEAD OF ASKING THESE UTTERLY C0RRUPT WEF PUPPETS ? THERE IS NO CLIMATE EMERGENCY
BS. Troll.
@MarkHardstaff-n9jThey are a fool
Agree I think LNP are heading that way but still nee$ to get elected so not going to come out and say
Agrre no climate emergency but some want to listen to woke scientist ,I guess they make more money that way. Many scientist have said there is no climate change and not to worry but politician have a different agenda here . We need trees no wind power self igniting windmills that cannot be recycled and are causing more harm then good to us.
Modern nuclear power stations are terrific, and so are Modern Coal power stations. They capture the polluting particulars and give us some CO2 to feed the plants and trees, which in return give us Oxygen.
but sadly, Peter Dutton is an unwitting traitor to our nation like all his predecessors back to the bad old Whitlam and Fraser days, being duped by the UN puppets for the WEF. Climate Change is the WEFs wealth redistribution has nothing to do with Climate,
49 years of just being WEF=WHO=UN Puppets since Labor PM Gough Whitlam and LNP Malcolm Fraser agreed to the UN Lima agreement in 1975 to sacrifice 30% of our industries. The 30% of Aussie jobs to help third-world countries like China prosper! Agreeing to impose every unelected UN agenda onto the Australian people since then!
Gosh! 49 years of endemic Politicians and bureaucrats' treason so far, since agreeing to the sly UN Lima agreement in 1975, Labor and the LNP take turns being just UN Puppets, knowing that the UN has also been just puppets for the WEF globalist monsters for half a century!
Climate Change? Yes, it does; that is the beauty of the Globalist Monsters using this to control and dominate the governments of all UN Member Countries, knowing that there will never be any proof that the UN is controlling the ever-changing Climate
The Dictionary defines TREASON; “Treason” is when a person acts against his/ her country. ... A treasonous person is called a TRAITOR! Outside the field of law, the word "traitor" can be used to describe a person who betrays a group to which he or she belongs!
The thing we are not talking about is who pays to clean up when Solar Panels and Wind Farms need to be removed ? It's the Land owner or the Tax payer.
Why would it be the taxpayer? And why is it a problem if it is the landowner?
No-one cares when a mining company abandons a mine, leaving the mess.
@@footbru Thanks for the question. If a Company builds a Mine, they must pay a Redevelopment Bond, so that if they go broke or just leave once the mine is used up, there is money to redevelop the site. But that is not the case for Solar or Wind farms. If the government gives the go ahead for Overseas investment companies to build Solar or Wind farms on either Commonwealth land or offshore (Ie. East coast NSW) then the Government may be responsible to clean up when those Farms are no longer viable.
Check this Video from Senator Malcom Roberts - ruclips.net/video/xEruPi_4bjA/видео.html
@@JeffreyHebard If it's private property, I don't see the problem.
You and others are silent when it comes to mine remediation, or offshore oil rig removals, but when it comes to renewables you howl like it's the end of the world that a private landowner is making money from his property.
It's like saying that all farms should be punished for not maintaining their sheds. None of your business.
As for Crown Land, I'm not aware of any licences onshore, but if there are, the relevant departments need to protect the assets - and I bet they will. Offshore I don't know about. But it's no different from offshore oil rigs. I don't hear you howling about those.
Malcolm Roberts is a dick.
@@footbru Sounds like you did not watch the Video and I'm not Howling just pointing out some facts and i agree landowners should be able to make money from their land any legal way they want but as it says in the video some are getting caught with no protection, just watch the video. Also, I did say that Companies that build a Mine, they MUST pay a Redevelopment Bond, so that if they go broke or just leave once the mine is used up, there is money to redevelop the site. But never mind have a great day.
@@JeffreyHebard Maybe you can also answer who is responsible for remediation of the Nuclear Power Plants - and insuring them against public liability?
Go Dutts
Why do we have to reach net zero? Will China or India be reaching net zero?
No, they don't have to!
China is the largest renewables producing company in the world champ 😂
NO
WUPER SCOOPER TROLL M!SSES THE POINT AGAIN & THROWS IN A NON SEQUITUR BS REPLY ,, IF CO2 IS DESTROYING THE PLANET, WHY EXPORT COAL TO THE WORLD'S BIGGEST CO2 EMITTER ? MORE GREEN LEFT WAFFLE & TAIL CHASING - CREATE CO2 TO REDUCE CO2.
@@wuper2270India just produced record number of coal for 2024 and was proud of it. Modi did an x post about it. What's your point ? Why kill ourselves if it makes no difference. Do it reasonably
Peter Dutton for PM. He spoke very well. Great job Laura.
Talk to Australian university students. Overwhelmingly they complain about the poor standard of tuition due to classes swamped with international students, struggling to understand due to language issues. The quality of our Universities... and education of our future generations... is being trashed by avaricious governing boards, endlessly syphoning foreign cash
Yes to nuclear power !
...and that means increasing risks of rolling blackouts while Australia waits 20+ years for the first operational reactor and more years to add more reactors, while the remaining ageing and increasingly less reliable coal-fired generators fail, and gas gets increasingly scarcer and more expensive.
No energy, no economy.
A vote for the Coalition is a vote for blackouts, rising energy costs and civilisation collapse.
Modern nuclear power stations are terrific, and so are Modern Coal power stations. They capture the polluting particulars and give us some CO2 to feed the plants and trees, which in return give us Oxygen.
but sadly, Peter Dutton is an unwitting traitor to our nation like all his predecessors back to the bad old Whitlam and Fraser days, being duped by the UN puppets for the WEF. Climate Change is the WEFs wealth redistribution has nothing to do with Climate,
49 years of just being WEF=WHO=UN Puppets since Labor PM Gough Whitlam and LNP Malcolm Fraser agreed to the UN Lima agreement in 1975 to sacrifice 30% of our industries. The 30% of Aussie jobs to help third-world countries like China prosper! Agreeing to impose every unelected UN agenda onto the Australian people since then!
Gosh! 49 years of endemic Politicians and bureaucrats' treason so far, since agreeing to the sly UN Lima agreement in 1975, Labor and the LNP take turns being just UN Puppets, knowing that the UN has also been just puppets for the WEF globalist monsters for half a century!
Climate Change? Yes, it does; that is the beauty of the Globalist Monsters using this to control and dominate the governments of all UN Member Countries, knowing that there will never be any proof that the UN is controlling the ever-changing Climate
The Dictionary defines TREASON; “Treason” is when a person acts against his/ her country. ... A treasonous person is called a TRAITOR! Outside the field of law, the word "traitor" can be used to describe a person who betrays a group to which he or she belongs!
Exactly! Excellent Peter Dutton and David Littleproud for your long-term solutions. Tired of Labor's tokenism and wokeism oppressing Australians. Thank you for treating Mr Dutton with the respect he deserves, unlike your previous interview.
Modern nuclear power stations are terrific, and so are Modern Coal power stations. They capture the polluting particulars and give us some CO2 to feed the plants and trees, which in return give us Oxygen.
but sadly, Peter Dutton is an unwitting traitor to our nation like all his predecessors back to the bad old Whitlam and Fraser days, being duped by the UN puppets for the WEF. Climate Change is the WEFs wealth redistribution has nothing to do with Climate,
49 years of just being WEF=WHO=UN Puppets since Labor PM Gough Whitlam and LNP Malcolm Fraser agreed to the UN Lima agreement in 1975 to sacrifice 30% of our industries. The 30% of Aussie jobs to help third-world countries like China prosper! Agreeing to impose every unelected UN agenda onto the Australian people since then!
Gosh! 49 years of endemic Politicians and bureaucrats' treason so far, since agreeing to the sly UN Lima agreement in 1975, Labor and the LNP take turns being just UN Puppets, knowing that the UN has also been just puppets for the WEF globalist monsters for half a century!
Climate Change? Yes, it does; that is the beauty of the Globalist Monsters using this to control and dominate the governments of all UN Member Countries, knowing that there will never be any proof that the UN is controlling the ever-changing Climate
The Dictionary defines TREASON; “Treason” is when a person acts against his/ her country. ... A treasonous person is called a TRAITOR! Outside the field of law, the word "traitor" can be used to describe a person who betrays a group to which he or she belongs!
Thorium reactors can be up and running in 5 years.
Australia should be leading the way.
China has two & has just committed to another 11 latest thorium reactors to build in next 5 years.
China has around 90 reactors with another 150 projected by 2035, they also have 3080 coal fired power stations with another two built each week.
There has been new recent rumours that the Three Gorges Dam is finally failing.
Dutton for PM !
Albanese should pay out of his own pocket
Pay for what?
I could reply, the LNP should pay out of their own pockets ... does that work for you?
Ian Plimer has clearly pointed out that Australia is already at nett zero.
Modern nuclear power stations are terrific, and so are Modern Coal power stations. They capture the polluting particulars and give us some CO2 to feed the plants and trees, which in return give us Oxygen.
but sadly, Peter Dutton is an unwitting traitor to our nation like all his predecessors back to the bad old Whitlam and Fraser days, being duped by the UN puppets for the WEF. Climate Change is the WEFs wealth redistribution has nothing to do with Climate,
49 years of just being WEF=WHO=UN Puppets since Labor PM Gough Whitlam and LNP Malcolm Fraser agreed to the UN Lima agreement in 1975 to sacrifice 30% of our industries. The 30% of Aussie jobs to help third-world countries like China prosper! Agreeing to impose every unelected UN agenda onto the Australian people since then!
Gosh! 49 years of endemic Politicians and bureaucrats' treason so far, since agreeing to the sly UN Lima agreement in 1975, Labor and the LNP take turns being just UN Puppets, knowing that the UN has also been just puppets for the WEF globalist monsters for half a century!
Climate Change? Yes, it does; that is the beauty of the Globalist Monsters using this to control and dominate the governments of all UN Member Countries, knowing that there will never be any proof that the UN is controlling the ever-changing Climate
The Dictionary defines TREASON; “Treason” is when a person acts against his/ her country. ... A treasonous person is called a TRAITOR! Outside the field of law, the word "traitor" can be used to describe a person who betrays a group to which he or she belongs!
Good clear questions Good clear answers. 👍
you know the countries cooked when pete dutton sounds logical
Peter Dutton has always been logical. An ex cop from the past has his head screwed in right.
Flip flopping Albo is not the answer and the amount of flights he took all over the world and his entourage contributed tonnes of emissions to the planet!
Nuclear is the cleanest energy we have. How long does it take for the stigma to wear off?
Agree, with a few hours reach on the internet of nuclear gives a good basic idea of what other countries are doing and what they find exceptable .
What would keep the 'lights on' in Australia while we wait 20+ years (NOT 10-12 years that the Coalition are promising) for any prospective nuclear generator units to become operational? It seems to me pro-nuclear ideologues never answer this inconvenient question. That's the conversation Australia needs to have.
No energy, no economy.
A vote for the Coalition is a vote for blackouts, rising energy costs and civilisation collapse.
@@polarbear7255 - "Coal will have to stay on the grid anyway to back up wind and solar."
Australia doesn't have 20+ years to wait for the first prospective nuclear generator to become operational. Coal-fired power in Australia is becoming increasingly unreliable and increasingly more expensive to run.
Most states on Australia’s main grid experienced a significant jump in wholesale electricity prices in the June 2024 quarter, as record demand driven by cold weather, and a combination of coal outages, and lower wind and hydro output caused a greater reliance on gas, the country’s most expensive power technology.
The worst affected state was NSW, which plays host to the biggest grid and the largest fleet of coal fired power generators, which experienced a three fold increase in the number of “baseload” plant failures.
Very few coal-fired generator units around the world are still operational beyond 50 years. The more renewables there are in the electricity grid system the less economically viable coal-fired plants become.
AEMO's expected closures of coal-fired generator units in NEM (assumed use-by date range 40-50 years after commissioning):
Site Name (state) _ _ Capacity (MW) _ Use-by Date Range _ _Expected closure year
Eraring (NSW): _ _ _ _ _ 4x 720 _ _ _ _ _ _ 2022 - 2034 _ _ _ _ _ 2027 (possibly 2029)
Callide B (QLD): _ _ _ _ 2x 350 _ _ _ _ _ _ 2028 - 2038 _ _ _ _ _ 2028
Yallourn W (VIC): _ 2x 360 + 2x 380 _ _ _ 2013 - 2034 _ _ _ _ _ 2028
Vales Point B (NSW): _2x 660 _ _ _ _ _ _ _2018 - 2028 _ _ _ _ _ 2033
Bayswater (NSW): _ _ _4x 660 _ _ _ _ _ _ _2025 - 2036 _ _ _ _ _ 2033
Gladstone (QLD): _ _ _ _6x 280 _ _ _ _ _ _ 2016 - 2026 _ _ _ _ _ 2035
Loy Yang A (VIC): _ 3x 560 + 1x 530 _ _ _ 2024 - 2038 _ _ _ _ _ 2035
Tarong (QLD): _ _ _ _ _ _4x 350 _ _ _ _ _ _ 2024 - 2036 _ _ _ _ _ 2037
Mt Piper (NSW): _ _ _ _ _2x 730 _ _ _ _ _ _2032 - 2043 _ _ _ _ _ 2040
Kogan Creek (QLD): _ _ _1x 750 _ _ _ _ _ _2047 - 2057 _ _ _ _ _ 2042
Stanwell (QLD): _ _ _ _ _ _4x 635 _ _ _ _ _ 2033 - 2046 _ _ _ _ _ 2043-46
Loy Yang B (VIC): _ _ _ _ 2x 535 _ _ _ _ _ _2033 - 2046 _ _ _ _ _ 2046
Millmerran (QLD): _ _ _ _ 2x 440 _ _ _ _ _ _2042 - 2052 _ _ _ _ _ 2051
Callide C (QLD): _ _ _ _ _ 2x 460 _ _ _ _ _ _ 2041 - 2051 _ _ _ _ _ Not Disclosed
And the existing coal mines supplying some of these coal fired generators also have limited lives. Some coal mines are due to close within this decade and more in the 2030s.
And the eastern and central states of Australia have less than 2 decades of 2P gas reserves remaining at current production rate.
I'd suggest our current energy security situation has been decades in the making by a succession of poor energy policies by both the Coalition and Labor governments at state and federal jurisdictions.
A vote for the Coalition is a vote for blackouts, rising energy prices and civilisation collapse.
Nuclear technologies are too slow to deploy to save us!
Net Zero is impossible
Honest guy. Dutton love the country. Have look what happening in uk and Europe
Modern nuclear power stations are terrific, and so are Modern Coal power stations. They capture the polluting particulars and give us some CO2 to feed the plants and trees, which in return provide us with Oxygen.
Sadly, Peter Dutton is an unwitting traitor to our nation, like all his predecessors back in the bad old Whitlam and Fraser days, who were duped by the UN puppets for the WEF. Climate Change is the WEFs wealth redistribution has nothing to do with Climate,
49 years of just being WEF=WHO=UN Puppets since Labor PM Gough Whitlam and LNP Malcolm Fraser agreed to the UN Lima agreement in 1975 to sacrifice 30% of our industries. The 30% of Aussie jobs to help third-world countries like China prosper! Agreeing to impose every unelected UN agenda onto the Australian people since then!
Gosh! 49 years of endemic Politicians and bureaucrats' treason so far, since agreeing to the sly UN Lima agreement in 1975, Labor and the LNP take turns being just UN Puppets, knowing that the UN has also been just puppets for the WEF globalist monsters for half a century!
Climate Change? Yes, it does; that is the beauty of the Globalist Monsters using this to control and dominate the governments of all UN Member Countries, knowing that there will never be any proof that the UN is controlling the ever-changing Climate
The Dictionary defines TREASON; “Treason” is when a person acts against his/ her country. ... A treasonous person is called a TRAITOR! Outside the field of law, the word "traitor" can be used to describe a person who betrays a group to which he or she belongs!
Well said Mr Dutton. Finally we have a leader in this country.
Agree
Modern nuclear power stations are terrific, as are Modern Coal power stations. They capture the polluting particulars and give us some CO2 to feed the plants and trees, giving us Oxygen.
Sadly, Peter Dutton is an unwitting traitor to our nation, like all his predecessors back in the bad old Whitlam and Fraser days, who were duped by the UN puppets for the WEF. Climate Change is the WEFs wealth redistribution has nothing to do with Climate,
49 years of just being WEF=WHO=UN Puppets since Labor PM Gough Whitlam and LNP Malcolm Fraser agreed to the UN Lima agreement in 1975 to sacrifice 30% of our industries. The 30% of Aussie jobs to help third-world countries like China prosper! Agreeing to impose every unelected UN agenda onto the Australian people since then!
Gosh! 49 years of endemic Politicians and bureaucrats' treason so far, since agreeing to the sly UN Lima agreement in 1975, Labor and the LNP take turns being just UN Puppets, knowing that the UN has also been just puppets for the WEF globalist monsters for half a century!
Climate Change? Yes, it does; that is the beauty of the Globalist Monsters using this to control and dominate the governments of all UN Member Countries, knowing that there will never be any proof that the UN is controlling the ever-changing Climate
The Dictionary defines TREASON; “Treason” is when a person acts against his/ her country. ... A treasonous person is called a TRAITOR! Outside the field of law, the word "traitor" can be used to describe a person who betrays a group to which he or she belongs!
Peter Dutton your a legend 👍
Most legends are dead. Not your ( possession ), you're as in you are between the ears.
@@countyorga764 Must be a Labor supporter, all abuse with no facts.
The gap in intelligence between Dutton and Albanese is amazing.
AUSTRALIA HAS MORE VEGETATION THAN THE MAJORITY OF COUNTRIES WHICH GIVES US NET ZERO NOW!😊
Yes, except they keep clearing it for wind & solar farms which use more energy and resources than they recover in a lifetime.
Sky News Australia, Yay! I liked this video so much, it made me smile!
I love coal and gas we sell it all around the world and where not allowed to use it, it laughable
I used to be a leftie, I couldn't stand this guy. Then COVID hit and the disgraceful Orwellian response changed me into a libertarian. Now I think this guy is a good, genuine man
So ... covid changed your brain?
As a small scale miner its absolutely ridiculous the red tape involved to register even a small 100x300m lease. No room for us little fellas anymore. Bloody grubs.
Good on you Peter Dutton .
Agree
So true Peter
I will not vote for labor surely they will not have my vote.
One day Australia wake up kick out labour kick out Muslim and get wealthy again.
Australians need to hear and see this discussion. Australians need to vote the coalition back in to put the country back on track Australia is going in the wrong direction under labour..I think politicians can obscure the truth but Peter Dutton does come across as a man with integrity he is in the same class as John Howard and Tony Abbot he will make a great prime minister….
Refreshing to hear a sensible politician, not say that Peter Dutton is all correct, however let him have a debate with Albosleezy and the Australian public will kick him out very quickly
When listening to Peter Dutton I can feel a professional and experience speech we can depend on Peter Dutton to run this country without a doubt.
We are already at net 0
Exactly. A 2014 Report by Dr. Vanessa Haverd of the CSIRO, Oceanic & Atmospheric Research Division demonstrated that Australia emitted 485 million tons of Co2 Per Year, and at the same time ABSORBED 2.2 BILLION Tons of Co2 Per Year. Since that time our Co2 emissions have reduced by a further 20% so we now ABSORB 6 TIMES MORE than we emit ALREADY.
Dutton is very honest logical and rational with his answers
The opposite of albo (dishonest irrational and illogical)
Agree with his nuclear energy stance but saying cost of living measures drives inflation is such a bull. He should blame russia's war and australia's economy reliance to china.
There is no such thing as net zero. Dutton and albo both Wef puppets. Dutton is left. Albo is so far far left. We’re screwed
What does "left" mean?
@@wuper2270 sucking off wef
Dutton just wants to win the next election so he has to pamper to the climate idiots, but at least his plan is viable.
FACT
@@wuper2270 bending over for global agendas
Queensland owner our power stations and grids and its recommended that other states follow suite. This is helpful w you deliver cheaper electricity bills
One only has to make themselves wise to what has happened in Germany with the massive PV solar and wind deployment and unfortunately blissfully we are making the same mistake.
The problem that the Germans have found was the renewables are dependent on the whims of the weather. On the other hand the demand of electricity is also variable, but this variability does not coincide with the weather. This means that there will also be gaps between the renewable energy generated and the demand. To fill this difference energy has to come from somewhere and the reality is that batteries and pumped hydro cannot do this alone. This means that at least gas (that can be turned on and off quickly) needs to be available to the FULL DEMAND capacity simply because the dark-lulls or the wind-droughts and prolonged cloudy days can bring the renewables to its knees where nothing is produced.
The cost of renewables will not only get higher with time, not because the panels may be cheap, but the entire infrastructure needs to be renewed every 20 years or so and there needs to be a massive overbuild to cover the vagaries of the weather. This means that operational efficiency of renewables is 30-40% at best and gas standby will be called into service whenever there are renewable/demand incompatibilities.
As the renewable penetration is increased, so will the peakiness of the renewables which means that during the summer if the sun shines and the wind blows, there may be a glut of energy produced while the demand during those times might not need all the energy generated. This means that energy shedding or load shedding needs to be invoked and those with PV rooftop installations will most likely be subjected to a negative feed-in tariff which means that this might be seen as a 'solar tax'.
The Germans have discovered the problems outlined above so what is being done? Because, as is the case in Australia, ideology overrides engineering and economic commonsense and for this reasons the Germans are still resisting nuclear and gas. The difference is that Germany will be able to fill the gaps from the French nuclear power that is expanding at a very high price to the consumer. Australia might not have a similar option.
Net zero is just fashion and should be treated as such..fashion changes daily but unfortunately politicians jump on the band waggon and by the time they get up and running to be fashionable its over.but the politicians run with it x 10.the point is stop following the flavour of the month and concentrate on running the country.
I’m from Indiana and I want Dutton!
Net zero will be easily achieved, The whole nation to be employed by the government to work on excel spreadsheets and attend meetings.
While outsourcing our carbon footprint to china
Peter would make a great PM 👍👍🇦🇺🇦🇺💪💪
CO2 is not thee problem as we are
Low now. The slight rise we have had means the wet lands are recovering as plants need co2 to grow.
And those growing plants release OXYGEN in daylight. Yes! Oxygen! Therefore higher CO2 emissions leads to more plant growth & more oxygen released. (Google oxygen and its source)
There is no reason to stop business in small country towns. This is the very fabric of Australia being blocked by insanity and her friends.
Agree
Labor is good but supporting Hamas is really bad bad decision. And hence not voting for labor any more. Go liby. 😂
We are the carbon they would like to delete , no other country is se radical about net zero than Australia without our consent.
Yet no end of life cleanup requirements on Wind or Solar factories - they should have to put 20% of their project cost into trust for making the place the same as it was prior to starting. Should be similar to mining not sure their bonds.
Many farmers don't realize that when they sign up for their annual cheque, THEY then become liable for the cleanup in 20 years time.
I simply don't understand why this is a problem - like asking someone who builds a house "who's gonna clean up when you demolish it".
A rubbish argument - pun intended. Simply another person making a mountain out of less than a molehill.
@@footbru Well a house site will be the person to buy it but probably for these renewable project the government will most likely pick up the tab and thus tax payer for government approving the implementations. That's why you see these renewables projects expecting the government to pay for transmission lines - surely the project could pay for it? A person buying a remote land parcel has to do such to get grid power.
As for a house if it's in decent nick and in a state it can be removed on stumps wood frame a house removalist company may take it perhaps make some coin to pay for remaining cleanup. If your statement were valid then why expect mining/gas/oil companies are expected to pay for cleanup? After all a bloody big hole makes for a grand swimming pool and a potentially toxic spa next door is a bonus.
I heard there's even talk about toxic chemicals coming off these renewables now but that's probably the molehill.
@@rw-xf4cb You are trying to make an argument out of nothing. It's none of your business what a landowner does with his property.
Why would a government get involved in remediation of private property? And mining companies have been walking away from sites leaving from toxic legacies for decades - do you complain that mining companies should be prevented from mining?
Mines have been synonymous with economic growth around NSW for over a century. However as these mines reach the end of their shelf life most are simply locked up and left to continue to pollute our river systems. Who cleans up the mess? Apparently no one.
See the RUclips video titled 𝗠𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗕𝗹𝘂𝗲 𝗠𝗼𝘂𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘀 - 𝗔 𝗗𝗼𝗰𝘂𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘆, published 23 Feb 2022, duration 26 minutes.
Why is it you seem worried about only the clean up of solar and wind farms, but apparently not about the ongoing damage/pollution actually happening from the consequences of mining activities?
Why would anyone invest in Australia if Labor just comes along and cancels everything ?
Why would anyone invest in Australia if the LNP just comes along and cancels everything?
What about making overseas actually PAY for our gas
There is offshore GAS reservoir off the coast of NSW, that would allow the east coast of Australia to safely support the current needs until nuclear reactors can be constructed to support base load production
Greg priestley - "There is offshore GAS reservoir off the coast of NSW..."
Where's your evidence/data? Australia's east coast gas reserves are inadequate to last decades at the current consumption rate.
A quick look at the AEMO’s 𝘎𝘢𝘴 𝘚𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘖𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘦𝘴 - 𝘔𝘢𝘳𝘤𝘩 2024: 𝘍𝘰𝘳 𝘈𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘢’𝘴 𝘌𝘢𝘴𝘵 𝘊𝘰𝘢𝘴𝘵 𝘎𝘢𝘴 𝘔𝘢𝘳𝘬𝘦𝘵 document shows in Figure 26 (on page 47):
𝗞𝗲𝘆 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮:
• 2023 actual consumption: _ _ _ 1,885 PJ
• 2P developed reserves: _ _ _ _ 17,640 PJ _ _ 𝗥/𝗣 = 𝟵.𝟰 𝘆𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘀; plus
• 2P undeveloped reserves: _ _ _16,279 PJ _ _ 𝗥/𝗣 = 𝟴.𝟲 𝘆𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘀
• 2C resources: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 41,938 PJ
...as at 31 Dec 2023.
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝟮𝗣 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗲𝘀 𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲 reflects statistically that there should be 𝗮𝘁 𝗹𝗲𝗮𝘀𝘁 𝗮 𝟱𝟬% 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗮𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 that the quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed the sum of estimated proved plus probable reserves.
𝗚𝗮𝘀 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗱𝗲𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗱 𝗮𝘀 𝗹𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗰𝗲𝗿𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗻, & potentially less commercially viable, sources of gas. When estimating these uncertain resources, the best estimate of contingent resources (2C) is used.
Figure 27 shows a large majority of the 2P reserves and 2C resources are concentrated in the north. Northern LNG producers control around 70% of the 2P developed and undeveloped reserves in the ECGM.
Gas is only going to get scarcer and less affordable.
I'd suggest it means increasing risks of rolling blackouts while Australia waits 20+ years for the first operational reactor and more years to add more reactors, while the remaining ageing and increasingly less reliable coal-fired generators fail, and gas gets increasingly scarcer and more expensive.
No energy, no economy.
A vote for the Coalition is a vote for blackouts, rising energy costs and civilisation collapse.
Most, if not all ageing, increasingly unreliable and increasingly more expensive to run coal-fired generators will be closed by 2038. What would keep the 'lights on' in Australia while we wait 20+ years (NOT 10-12 years that the Coalition are promising) for any prospective nuclear generator units to become operational? It seems to me pro-nuclear ideologues never answer this inconvenient question. That's the conversation Australia needs to have.
Overwhelming evidence/data indicates that nuclear technologies:
𝟭. 𝗔𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗼𝗼 𝘀𝗹𝗼𝘄 𝘁𝗼 𝗱𝗲𝗽𝗹𝗼𝘆 (likely mid-2040s at the earliest for any possible operational nuclear reactor(s) in Australia);
𝟮. 𝗔𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗼𝗼 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗶𝘃𝗲 (almost double to six times the cost of ‘firmed’ renewables, per 𝘎𝘦𝘯𝘊𝘰𝘴𝘵 2023-24, Lazard’s LCOE v17);
𝟯. 𝗨𝘀𝗲 𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲 𝗳𝘂𝗲𝗹𝘀 𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗾𝘂𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝘀𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗻 𝗹𝗼𝗻𝗴-𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗺 𝗮 𝘀𝗼-𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗱 “𝗻𝘂𝗰𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗮𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲” (see the Energy Watch Group’s 2013 report titled 𝘍𝘰𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘭 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘕𝘶𝘤𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘍𝘶𝘦𝘭𝘴 - 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘶𝘱𝘱𝘭𝘺 𝘖𝘶𝘵𝘭𝘰𝘰𝘬, Figure 113: Historic and possible future development of uranium production and demand); and
𝟰. 𝗟𝗲𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗱 𝗮 𝘁𝗼𝘅𝗶𝗰 𝘄𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲 𝗹𝗲𝗴𝗮𝗰𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗹𝗼𝗻𝗴 𝗼𝘂𝘁𝗹𝗮𝘀𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝘆 𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗴𝘆 𝗯𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗳𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝗴𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗱 (an intergenerational issue).
Australia is practically floating on a big pool of gas, we could use less than we give away without payment to power Australia, clean, efficient, local, cheap/free, scalable & reliable gas.
@@landcruiser11rum You make up fantasies.
Gas is only going to get scarcer and more expensive. The era of global cheap petroleum oil and fossil methane gas supplies has ended.
US petroleum geologist Art Berman was in conversation with Johan Landgren in the RUclips video titled 𝗔𝗿𝘁𝗵𝘂𝗿 𝗕𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗻: 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗣𝗲𝗿𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗘𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗴𝘆 𝗦𝘁𝗼𝗿𝗺 - 𝗣𝗲𝗮𝗸 𝗖𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗽 𝗢𝗶𝗹 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗡𝗮𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗚𝗮𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲, published 16 Feb 2024, duration 55 minutes. On when the US shale gas decline is likely, Art Berman said (from around the 37¼ minute mark):
"𝘐’𝘮 𝘲𝘶𝘪𝘵𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘧𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘣𝘦𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘢𝘥𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘸𝘦’𝘳𝘦 𝘨𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘦𝘦 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘱𝘭𝘺 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘴 𝘣𝘺 𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘬𝘦𝘵𝘴 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘣𝘰𝘵𝘩 𝘰𝘪𝘭 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘢𝘭 𝘨𝘢𝘴, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘵 𝘸𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘴𝘶𝘳𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘦 𝘮𝘦 𝘪𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘩𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘢 𝘺𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘸𝘰, 𝘢𝘩, 𝘢𝘴 𝘰𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰, 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘰𝘳 𝘴𝘪𝘹 𝘺𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘸𝘦 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘢𝘥𝘦."
ruclips.net/video/rv85LTMO8TQ/видео.html
It seems we won’t need to wait long to see whether Art Berman’s expectations are correct, or not.
Even Labor says that renewables can't cope without massive electricity generation from gas as well, too bad that there won't be any gas by then.
Where did "Labor" say this?
@@footbru Albanese said it on the news after AEMO said that 26 new gas power stations would be needed to be built on the East Coast.
@@actualfacts1055 OK, thanks. Unfortunate. AEMO said it - I hope there is a renewable alternative.
I guess Dutton's plan will need something like this as well, since he only plans to build 38 GW of nukes, and they can't all run, all the time. So maybe 33 or 35GW at peak.
"Opposition energy spokesman Ted O’Brien has promised to release a gas policy before the election. He was contacted for comment.
Not everyone agrees that more gas is needed. Renewable and climate advocates argue that pumped hydro dams coupled with batteries can provide the storage needed to back up renewables, coupled with policies to reduce energy demand with increased energy efficiency." - from SMH
@@actualfacts1055 I replied earlier, but YT blocked it - trying again
OK, thanks. Unfortunate. AEMO said it - I hope there is a renewable alternative.
I guess Dutton's plan will need something like this as well, since he only plans to build 38 GW of nukes, and they can't all run at 100%, all the time. So maybe 33 or 35GW at peak. Actually, now that I think about it, it's six plants on the east coast, and one isolated plant in WA. So that's 27 or 28 GW peak.
What does WA do if their nuclear reactor needs to have maintenance?? You can't have just one, disconnected from all other forms of generation?
"Opposition energy spokesman Ted O’Brien has promised to release a gas policy before the election. He was contacted for comment.
Not everyone agrees that more gas is needed. Renewable and climate advocates argue that pumped hydro dams coupled with batteries can provide the storage needed to back up renewables, coupled with policies to reduce energy demand with increased energy efficiency." - from SMH
@@actualfacts1055 YT won't allow my reply. I wish I understood.
Omg living in the past as usual here on the thinking man’s channel 😂 already Australia and most countries around the world surpassing expectations on renewable energy…. In 2 years most countries will be well over 50% renewables.
Yes Peter and who was in government when the government decided that we didn’t need an Australian car industry? Why hasn’t any government removed the luxury car taxes?
PD spitting facts.
We must start the move to open up to nuclear energy.
What is Net Zero, how is it measured, where are we now and how will what we are proposing achieve it?
It's an I.Q. matrix used in Canberra.
Not even by 3050. In typical Australian style still talking about it.
The difference between a Leader and a Woke fool.
"net zero"
Australia is already carbon negative, the only country in the world that stores more carbon than it produces. We don't need to do ANYTHING we've already achieved net zero and indeed net negative!
Labor giving two and a half million to Brittany for helping them to win the election is more important apparently.
We're screwed either way under Labor or Liberal.
We don’t need net zero we need to get back to what made Australia Farming Forestry and mining
Just breathing expels co2. I want my fellow man still breathing in 2050.
We actually expel 50-70 times more CO2 than we inhale, I’m sure Labor is already working on a new tax for that too.
Net zero is a government fantasy. But let’s ignore the failing economy and act like children debating a fantasy.
Give us a plan Dutton with all the details so we can make our own mind up. It's no good just talking about how good it all will be, we need answers to a lot of questions. As long as they are not forthcoming the LNP does mot deserve to be in government. Whether you agree with the view of Labor or not, at least they make it very clear where they stand.
Blackout Bowen never provides any details at all.
A good point about putting forward the plan, he says it's coming soon so I look forward to seeing it.
I partly agree. All parties need to be more transparent with their energy proposals. The longer we keep back flipping the higher costs get.
Labor has pretended to have the answers but has instead fallen short on delivery.
Tough calls need to be made with energy and housing. Who will step up?
@@DavidLloyd187 100% agree. We don't have any costings at all from the current government or an economic and long-term infrastructure overview. So, what land will be used for renewables? What's the firming power? What type of electricity storage will we need? How much will that cost, and where will it be located? The current governments energy policy seems to be adhoc with an attitude of let's cross that bridge when we come to it, but I think to transition the whole nation will need a structured, planned, and possibly a staggered approach. I'd like to be able to compare policies side by side.
Labor's plan is to rely on free enterprise.
Dutton's plan is almost communist - government to pay and force state and local governments to comply. Local communities will have no say. From what we know of Dutton's "plan" - so little detail so far.
So what’s the plan then Peter? How are you going to deliver this without sending the country bankrupt and within a reasonable timeframe that isn’t beyond the average Australian’s natural lifespan? Or wasn’t there enough room on the back of that paper napkin to work out those details? 🤓🥔☢
China produce from Carbon alone 1100 Gigawatts, and increasing
Australia produce less than 100 Gigawatts, and decreasing. And WE are to blame?
Peter wake up and to the Australian people wake up you can not get to zero its impossible
Nuclear and Coal before fracking. IMHO stay out of our farmland. NUCLEAR NOW
What's unviable is that a government is voted in to run the country and is set upon by the unelected opposition on any minor detail, my slant is if opposition have better ideas put them on the table with some comitment and detail.
The issue is the opposition seems to be wanting full control of the running of the country, on someones behalf?
The building of a sustainable energy infrastructure is in the public interest .
A farmer having the right to cut down a tree for fence post doesn't help the fence post seller.
If the Farmer is on crown land the trees are not his!
Also the farmer is robbed of trees for firewood. A lot of wood thieves in Victoria😮
What an ignorant comment.
@@vernonwhite4660 The timber on crown land and reserves is managed by the state government.
In 2011 the labour party commited to banning wood fires in city centres as a wood fire releases in 2hrs the same amouny of carbon as an average car does in a year.
LNP got in and rolled all that back as well as the carbon taxes that would now be funding renewables.
Good old head in the sand LNP.
@@vernonwhite4660 I don't think I have met many farmers who like trees.
Africa is definitely where it is at. Fixing problems and making problems are distinctly different.
Compare to albo this guy speaks so well
I would vote for Peter but I fear he could just be another WEF puppet, what's his thoughts on , digital ID, Vaccine mandates, WHO treaty etc, that's what i want to know.
That is a worry, I believe he is WEF, he did go with the digital ID when Labor snuck it through just after their pathetic budget. Not sure about the others, hmmm.
Why cant he give us any details? 😂
The price of gas sets the marginal price of electricity, it has nothing to do with renewable energy. We pay the max price for gas even higher than we sell our Gas to China for. The Chinese on-sell our gas and make a profit. If gas price is forced down for domestic consumers, energy/electricity prices will drop. The push for Nukes is just stalling so more coal can be used in conventional stations. the problem is that Australia will be bypassed by technological advances and the half-built nukes will end up as stranded assets before they are even finished. Renewables can and will be the primary source of energy in the future, however, this won't happen overnight and a transition strategy is required. We don't need more gas we have more than enough, the only reason to drill for more gas is to increase the exploitation of Australians and allow foreign-owned companies to export even more while paying next to zero tax, and keeping East Coast prices sky-high again Dutton needs to work in Australian's interest, not for foreign companies - the more gas thing is just gaslighting on steroids.
Dutton really needs to talk to a few actual experts instead of his groupthink mates because he got so much wrong it isn't even funny.
Albo is history the worst PM ever, so Dutton likely will win the election as long as he keeps breathing and he needs to get it right and cut the gaslighting and cut the extreme favouritism of selected mates and start talking to a board church - otherwise, he will be another one-term blunder like Albo- who are these farmers who need to put two D7 with chains though for even more land clearing/stripping are they Chinese owned cattle farmers or GR owned properties or even ME owned farming interests. let's see names and what they are asking to do first.
@woodliceworm4565 - "The price of gas sets the marginal price of electricity, it has nothing to do with renewable energy."
Yep, and data I see indicates global supplies of fossil methane gas are only going to get scarcer and more expensive.
US petroleum geologist Art Berman was in conversation with Johan Landgren in the RUclips video titled 𝗔𝗿𝘁𝗵𝘂𝗿 𝗕𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗻: 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗣𝗲𝗿𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗘𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗴𝘆 𝗦𝘁𝗼𝗿𝗺 - 𝗣𝗲𝗮𝗸 𝗖𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗽 𝗢𝗶𝗹 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗡𝗮𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗚𝗮𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲, published 16 Feb 2024, duration 55 minutes. On when the US shale gas decline is likely, Art Berman said (from around the 37¼ minute mark):
"𝘐’𝘮 𝘲𝘶𝘪𝘵𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘧𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘣𝘦𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘢𝘥𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘸𝘦’𝘳𝘦 𝘨𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘦𝘦 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘱𝘭𝘺 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘴 𝘣𝘺 𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘬𝘦𝘵𝘴 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘣𝘰𝘵𝘩 𝘰𝘪𝘭 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘢𝘭 𝘨𝘢𝘴, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘵 𝘸𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘴𝘶𝘳𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘦 𝘮𝘦 𝘪𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘩𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘢 𝘺𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘸𝘰, 𝘢𝘩, 𝘢𝘴 𝘰𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰, 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘰𝘳 𝘴𝘪𝘹 𝘺𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘸𝘦 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘢𝘥𝘦."
ruclips.net/video/rv85LTMO8TQ/видео.html
It seems we won’t need to wait long to see whether Art Berman’s expectations are correct, or not.
A vote for the Coalition is a vote for blackouts, rising energy costs and civilisation collapse.
some great insights
fk net zero
I do not give a crap about net zero, dump it now. We want cheap energy not this net zero garbage!!
why do we worry about "net zero" as some countries like chyna, india, ... never think about it
Roof top solar plus batteries for all homes would immediately cut family power bills. Extreme weather is happening now. We can't wait to start action sometime in the future.
What Dutton means is Australia MIGHT not reach net zero by 2050. However net zero is only a goal - the main thing is trying to a achieve a reduction in carbon emissions. Are nuclear emissions less damaging. When Chernobyl happened, by sister-in-law in Germany was pleased to tell me the radioactive pollution would also reach the southern hemisphere.
The Laws of Physics are not negotiable. Net zero by 2050 is already far, far too late!
Earth had the two hottest days on record and the weather is acting like it.
ruclips.net/video/e5babdQYKV8/видео.html
The global mean surface temperature (GMST) anomaly is currently about +1.3 °C (30-year mean) relative to the 1850-1900 baseline.
The GMST anomaly will inevitably breach the +1.5 °C (30-year mean) threshold, and that's likely sometime around 2030, perhaps as early as 2028, or perhaps as late as 2036.
And the GMST anomaly is currently on a trajectory to breach the +2.0 °C (30-year mean) threshold likely sometime in the 2040s, maybe as late as 2062.
At +1.5 °C (30-year mean) threshold, the scientific community warn that 70-90% of coral reefs globally would be destroyed, and only 1% would remain once +2.0 °C (30-year mean) threshold was reached.
Meanwhile, leading Australian climate scientist Dr Joëlle Gergis takes a timely look at Australia's perilous future in a warming world, recorded at an event at Gleebooks in Sydney on Tuesday, 4 Jun 2024.
"𝘔𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘈𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘯'𝘵 𝘢𝘸𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘩𝘰𝘸 𝘣𝘢𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘩𝘰𝘸 𝘮𝘶𝘤𝘩 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘴𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘨𝘦𝘵." - Dr Joëlle Gergis
Hear the ABC RN podcast titled 𝗛𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘄𝗮𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝗛𝗲𝗹𝗹 - 𝗝𝗼𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗲 𝗚𝗲𝗿𝗴𝗶𝘀 𝗼𝗻 𝗰𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗔𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗹𝗶𝗮’𝘀 𝗳𝘂𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲, published 25 Jun 2024, duration 52 minutes.
I'd suggest extending the life of coal and gas fired power stations means increasing risks of rolling blackouts while Australia waits 20+ years for the first operational reactor and more years to add more reactors, while the remaining ageing and increasingly less reliable coal-fired generators fail, and gas gets increasingly scarcer and more expensive.
No energy, no economy.
A vote for the Coalition is a vote for blackouts, rising energy costs and civilisation collapse.
We are already at net zero. Net zero is when you have enough trees to deal with the carbon being produced. Carbon Dioxide feeds plants.
So why are atmospheric CO₂ concentrations still rising if "We are already at net zero"?
See the RUclips video titled 𝗖𝗮𝗿𝗯𝗼𝗻 𝗱𝗶𝗼𝘅𝗶𝗱𝗲 𝗽𝘂𝗺𝗽𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗹𝗲 - 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟮, showing the history of atmospheric CO₂, from 800,000 years ago until January 2022.
ruclips.net/video/I7jKxO4nKZc/видео.html
Per the latest data from NOAA, the global average atmospheric CO₂ concentrations were at:
May 2023: 420.52 ppm
May 2024: 423.43 ppm
Earth had the two hottest days on record and the weather is acting like it.
ruclips.net/video/e5babdQYKV8/видео.html
@phyrexian8610 - "Carbon Dioxide feeds plants."
Atmospheric CO₂ concentrations also traps more heat. Increasing heat eventually kills plants and animals (including humans).
Leading Australian climate scientist Dr Joëlle Gergis takes a timely look at Australia's perilous future in a warming world, recorded at an event at Gleebooks in Sydney on Tuesday, 4 Jun 2024.
"𝘔𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘈𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘯'𝘵 𝘢𝘸𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘩𝘰𝘸 𝘣𝘢𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘩𝘰𝘸 𝘮𝘶𝘤𝘩 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘴𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘨𝘦𝘵." - Dr Joëlle Gergis
Hear the ABC RN podcast titled 𝗛𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘄𝗮𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝗛𝗲𝗹𝗹 - 𝗝𝗼𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗲 𝗚𝗲𝗿𝗴𝗶𝘀 𝗼𝗻 𝗰𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗔𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗹𝗶𝗮’𝘀 𝗳𝘂𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲, published 25 Jun 2024, duration 52 minutes.
Havent we achieved 3x net zero?
Yes. Dr. Vanessa Havard of the CSIRO Oceanic and Atmospheric Research Division in her 2014 Report, demonstrated that our emissions were 485 Million Tons of Co2 Per Year and our ABSORBTION was 2.2 BILLION tons of Co2 Per Year. We have further reduced our emissions by 20% since that time. All the pain that both state and Federal Governments impose on Australians is DISGUSTING for a false "NetZero" narrative. China opens a new Coal fired Power Station EVERY WEEK. THAT is where the worlds Co2 difficulties emanate.