The Defense of Guam
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 8 сен 2024
- Please join the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) and the Association of the U.S. Army (AUSA) for our fifth Strategic Landpower Dialogue event on the defense of Guam. The event will feature Lieutenant General Robert Rasch, Director of the Rapid Capabilities and Critical Technologies Office (RCCTO) and the Executive Officer of the Joint Program Office for the Guam Defense System, Brigadier General Frank Lozano, Program Executive Officer (PEO), Missiles and Space, and Brigadier General Patrick Costello, Commanding General, 94th Army Air and Missile Defense Command. The discussion will review the state of efforts for providing comprehensive air and missile defense of Guam, and in particular the challenges associated with integrating several distinct fire control systems.
The Strategic Landpower Dialogue is a quarterly event series that serves as a unique source of data and insight into the current thinking of and future challenges facing the U.S. Army and land-based forces across the services. The series convenes senior Army officers and leaders to discuss the most critical landpower issues.
This event series is made possible through the generous support of General Dynamics.
---------------------------------------------
A nonpartisan institution, CSIS is the top national security think tank in the world.
Visit www.csis.org to find more of our work as we bring bipartisan solutions to the world's greatest challenges.
Want to see more videos and virtual events? Subscribe to this channel and turn on notifications: cs.is/2dCfTve
Follow CSIS on:
• Twitter: csis
• Facebook: CSIS.org
• Instagram: csis
Amazing conversation, I hope the Australian DoD is taking notes and taking what we can to defend our outer islands.
We love Guam 🇬🇺🤝🇺🇸
Who's we? 😂
Didn't notice the American flag huh? You know, WE Americans.
@@reaperbsc 75IQ huh...americans AND who? Lmao
I am very confident &
reassured In Our leadership of the protection of my homeland. You guys are truly the 3 musketeers of Guam
30:00 troubling to hear the general refer to NASAMS as somehow dubious because it is a foreign system. What does that say to US allies who purchase US equipment?
It says that we trust things we design more? People always trust things they build more then things someone else built. That's not weird at all. That's just practical.
You should look at Jim Webbs comments on Guam
It seems to me that much of this is in, at least, a confidential realm.
Yes, what also intrigued me recently is this, quite a success and a surprise for me: "U.S. Navy Confirms SM-6 Air Launched Configuration is ‘Operationally Deployed’"
Well done.
Maybe I shouldn't but...
Let's imagine we are in the 17th or 18th century. Both the Royal and Royale navies use not conventional but atomic or hydrogene balls. Could you tell us about - I anticipate casualties to be higher - social, economical, of course, health consequencies on populations. What would be the alternatives for populations to overcome these consequencies?
Also, and as you said, could you elaborate about positive and negative impacts of such simulation?
Are Diplomats, for example, interested/involved in the work you do?
Thank you in advance for your time and efforts.
PS: feel free to theorize about all the aspects I am missing.
Just in the defense of Guam? What about the entire Marianas Islands chain?
Wasn't expecting such heavy corporate lingo, you know the type that stretches a 10 minute meeting into 2 hours and makes everybody zone out, but I guess they are not unlike managers in a large company. I was expecting a more direct conversation.
this is corporate life + military UCJ + national defense.
Watching this, I hear alot of "we're working on this" and "we've got only 8 guys on this issue".... pretty sad honestly. I mean, we've known about Chinese ballistic missile (BM) threats on Guam for YEARS... and by they way, US Army has no base-defense against FPV drones.
I generally agree with you, but the U.S. has "C-UAS" to help defend against drones. I think the only answer might be to outproduce the enemy, which is quite the challenge with China.
We failed to defend and emphasize on defending US forward territories in the Pacific during WWII 1941-42, we shouldn't make the same mistake again, also the USAAF planes should have had at least resistance against Japanese invasion force, but MacArthur said they should stand down prior being attacked.
Hopen es mi travajo
The days of defence are gone
I am USNA class of 83 and 24 year of FBI. I live and own a condo. People should recognize Guam and call out MTG for saying the US should cut out for foreign countries like Guam. Dare you.respond?
The focus must be on the Chinese missiles. They are going to be coming en masse. How would you defend? Would the best defense be to simply detect the fired missiles quickly and respond with missiles in Guam aimed at strategic locations, firing before the Chinese missiles manage to hit Guam? I am worried because the West really didn't have an answer to mass production. The Warsaw Pact had far more divisions ready than NATO during the Cold War. NATO didn't have an answer to that, at least conventionally.
No reason for Guam itself to have missiles. Any Chinese missile will be detected at launch and US response will come from any of a dozen places.
I would also add the inspired by the Russo-Ukrainian War, suicide drones are another threat now. Whereas the current technology used by both combatants in that conflict is basic, be prepared and assume that China would be developing stealthy swarm types.
อนิสา ไม่ได้ช่วยลี เจ้าของเบอร์โทรศัพ ที่กำพูชาคะ .ดีแทค...โรงแรมในประเทศไทยคะ
The US military has been dropping the ball on the china issue for 2 decades. NOW we're playing catch up.
Lol. Okay buddy.
so much talk about nothing.
China are confusing why US so loving war, Vietnam Philippines Afghanistan Iraq Libya Syria and also used atomic bombs Japan. 😢
We love war because there are a bunch of bad people/organizations like china, russia, the taliban, North korea, iran, etc want to do bad things. So we make sure we can stop them. It's just prudence.