Don't worry, in training I knocked the fire leaver on a 105 Light Gun just as the breech closed and the loaded had his clenched hand behind the breech block, did not expect the recoil so soon.
In the Eighties as 1 st Lt, I served with the FH70 in the oldest Italian artillery regiment (from 1851until today). Maybe because they were still quite new but we did not encounter all those reliability problems mentioned in the video. A notable element was the speed when towed. We trained in continuous changes of position, so as to escape a possible counter battery fire, without wasting time hooking to the tractors, the ability of autonomous movement was very appreciated. In off road it was maybe a little funny, especially when the plate was rocking and ringing like a bell, but fast enough.
I'll never forget driving fast in convoy with howitzers in tow back in the 60s. No GPS, all maps and survey instruments (theodolites) and forward observers. Set up fire control, survey in the howitzers, and fire spotter rounds. When on target, fire battery for effect. I did both forward observer and fire control jobs as an officer.
I was part of the Battery that ran the trials in the UK. This would have been in 1978 - It was a very capable Howitzer - We had Foden Trucks to pull them. We easily achieved 6 rounds a minute with a well trained crew of six. We were not use to the semi automatic loading and some guys lost a finger in the first six months. In fact I remember one display at Larkhill where we drove on to the stand, deployed and fired six rounds, and started to drive off before the first round loaded on the impact area (about 30 seconds). Direct fire on tanks took off the turret with HE shell and no need for a HESH development 🙂
I was an apprentice fitter and worked on the first prototype in Vickers, Barrow - In - Furness, England, in 1969. Fabulous to know they're still being used 50 years later. Not a bad gun I think.
Well I said that was my first car, i currently got a Karl Gerät 600mm mortar. Parking's never a problem since there's always enough space, just don't worry about the cars in that space.
Achtung baby! Sorry, it’s the only German language phrase I know! That and LUFTWAFFE and 99 LUFT BALLOONS. LOL! I likely know much more than that, considering English is an offshoot of German. “English” itself is formed from “Anglo-Saxon”, and the Angles and Saxons were from, roughly, Denmark and parts of Germany. Or so I’ve read. I’d love to learn German. Fortunately, many Germans (and much of the world), speak English! It embarrasses me, but in my defense, what incentive do I have to learn a foreign language when most everyone else speaks or understands English? Further in my defense, rarely do I come across Germans. Mexicans, on the other hand, are forever amongst me. So I speak Spanish, well enough.
This harkens me back to 1954 when I joined a US Marine Reserve unit which had a single, 155mm "Long Tom" gun. The gun could be fired in either direct fire mode or as a howitzer and had a range of 24,000 yards or 22 km when firing a 100 pound armor piercing round. By the time I went on active duty in 1956 the reserve unit was equipped with a huge 155mm self propelled gun, but I don't recall much about it.
My service time was on this gun. Hydraulic failure did occure on my gun during manouvers. Always wanted tracked artillery. PZH2000 or even M109 would have been fine. Living in the winter mud was not fun. Army time was a lifetime experience, but frankly wasted time. Getting up early, then doing nothing, mostly sitting and waiting for lunch or dinner time. All in the 2000s, so no www.
In '82-'83,,I was on special duty in the national guard,,too hard to describe,, here,,my platoon of M48A5's were going up a hill,,just before we crested,,,,BOOM!!,,BOOM!!,,BOOM!!....A battery of 175's LET LOOSE!!...We were in no REAL danger,,but if you think being BEHIND one of those HITS you in the FACE!,, YOU HAVE NOOOO IDEA!!!! We hung out for a while,,watching and LISTENING to the shells flying to the impact area...SOOO COOOL!!!
huh? i googled JUNk 155 field artiillery. it came back with the M198. same thing?? :) Joke. its a decent system, but doesnt come close to the G5. misses by about 15km.(Maximum firing range 30km vs 45km, and thats without rocket assisted ammo) Does it also have an auxillary power system to allow it to be driven into position? on what points do you think is better?
Ammunition The new projectiles conformed to the Quadrilateral Ballistics Agreement between US, UK, Germany and Italy. In essence, this meant a shell with the same shape and dimensions as the US M549 rocket-assisted projectile. The standard HE shell (UK designation L15) is a thin wall design weighing 43.5 kg and containing 11.3 kg of HE. This remains the largest HE load for a standard 155mm shell. The propellant system comprises three different bagged cartridges with triple-base propellant. Cartridge 1 gives charges 1 & 2, Cartridge 2 give charges 3-7 and Cartridge 3 is charge 8, which gives a maximum range under standard conditions of 24.7 km. Each nation developed its own fuzes and ammunition packaging. In the UK's case, this led to the Unit Load Container carrying 17 complete rounds, including shells with fuzes fitted - a novelty for 155 mm. Standard US pattern 155 mm ammunition can also be fired, although US primers proved problematic for the primer magazine and feed due to their variation in size. VOLCANO MUNITION Under the name Vulcano, the Italian company Leonardo-Oto Melara has identified a new family of bullets for its 127mm naval cannon also in the 64 calibre version and for the 155 mm howitzers, both the trailed Fh-70 cannon and those that equip the self-propelled M109 and PzH 2000; these bullets have the characteristic of having an extended range compared to traditional ammunition of the same calibre and, for some versions, a guidance system that allows precision attacks against naval or land targets. The same projectile can be fired from different calibres (127 mm and 155 mm) as it is undercalibrated and cambered by means of disposable spacers in the same way as APFSDS projectiles, the precise denomination for this type of ammunition is HEFSDS (High Explosives Fin Stabilized Discarding Sabot), i.e. a high explosiveness, fin stabilized, casing abandonment projectile. The ammunition consists of two sections, with the front component with canard fins and the rear part with spacer fins. The front part contains the warhead and has 6 fins. In all, the bullet weighs about 20 kg with 2.5 kg of explosive. The ammunition will be of 3 types: Ballistic Extended Range (BER) - basic unguided version that can reach 70 km and can be used against any type of naval, land or air targets. Guided Long Range (GLR) - anti-ship version guided in the final by an infrared (IR) sensor that starts searching for the target at a distance of 6 km and at an altitude of 2.5 km. It can reach 70 km or even 90 km if fired from the 64 gauge barrel. The warhead explodes after penetrating the hull of the target ship. Oto Melara indicates a "kill probability" of 80% with the first shot against a ship the size of a frigate. Guided Long Range (GLR) - fully guided ammunition via GPS and IMU (Inertial Measurement Unit). The bullet is fired up to a height of 25 km where it is guided by the IMU system constantly updated by the GPS continuing at supersonic speed with a constant angle of descent. The last phase of the flight takes place in nosedive on the target. The concept of the new munitions family "Vulcano" has been developed by Leonardo-OTO Melara of La Spezia and provides for an under-calibrated non self-propelled ammunition equipped, in the guided version, with aerodynamic governments, inertial navigation/GPS and, in some subtypes, with a terminal guidance system, characterized by a very high range and a very high accuracy (CEP < 20m). A first differentiation between ammunition that is being developed under the Program can be made between unguided and guided ammunition, called Extended Range and Long Range respectively. The calibers under development are 155mm in the land version and 127mm in the naval version. The trajectory of unguided ammunition is conventional ballistic ammunition with a range of up to 70 km, while the range of the guided versions will reach 100 km when fired from cannon cal. 127/54C and 120 km when fired from the new cannon cal. 127/64LW. For the cal. 155mm the expected range is up to 100 km. These ranges will be achievable thanks to a very high initial velocity of the bullets and very low aerodynamic coefficients when compared to those of large caliber ammunition in service. The projectiles are equipped with a multi-function fuse, based on microwave technology and programmable with altimetric, proximity, impact, delayed impact or time functionality. The main difference in the terrestrial versions, apart from the calibre, is the different configuration of the propellant assembly, specifically designed to ensure total compatibility with the PzH2000 self-propelled howitzer loading system. Ammunition The new projectiles conformed to the Quadrilateral Ballistics Agreement between US, UK, Germany and Italy. In essence, this meant a shell with the same shape and dimensions as the US M549 rocket-assisted projectile. The standard HE shell (UK designation L15) is a thin wall design weighing 43.5 kg and containing 11.3 kg of HE. This remains the largest HE load for a standard 155mm shell. The propellant system comprises three different bagged cartridges with triple-base propellant. Cartridge 1 gives charges 1 & 2, Cartridge 2 give charges 3-7 and Cartridge 3 is charge 8, which gives a maximum range under standard conditions of 24.7 km. Each nation developed its own fuzes and ammunition packaging. In the UK's case, this led to the Unit Load Container carrying 17 complete rounds, including shells with fuzes fitted - a novelty for 155 mm. Standard US pattern 155 mm ammunition can also be fired, although US primers proved problematic for the primer magazine and feed due to their variation in size. VOLCANO MUNITION Under the name Vulcano, the Italian company Leonardo-Oto Melara has identified a new family of bullets for its 127mm naval cannon also in the 64 calibre version and for the 155 mm howitzers, both the trailed Fh-70 cannon and those that equip the self-propelled M109 and PzH 2000; these bullets have the characteristic of having an extended range compared to traditional ammunition of the same calibre and, for some versions, a guidance system that allows precision attacks against naval or land targets. The same projectile can be fired from different calibres (127 mm and 155 mm) as it is undercalibrated and cambered by means of disposable spacers in the same way as APFSDS projectiles, the precise denomination for this type of ammunition is HEFSDS (High Explosives Fin Stabilized Discarding Sabot), i.e. a high explosiveness, fin stabilized, casing abandonment projectile. The ammunition consists of two sections, with the front component with canard fins and the rear part with spacer fins. The front part contains the warhead and has 6 fins. In all, the bullet weighs about 20 kg with 2.5 kg of explosive. The ammunition will be of 3 types: Ballistic Extended Range (BER) - basic unguided version that can reach 70 km and can be used against any type of naval, land or air targets. Guided Long Range (GLR) - anti-ship version guided in the final by an infrared (IR) sensor that starts searching for the target at a distance of 6 km and at an altitude of 2.5 km. It can reach 70 km or even 90 km if fired from the 64 gauge barrel. The warhead explodes after penetrating the hull of the target ship. Oto Melara indicates a "kill probability" of 80% with the first shot against a ship the size of a frigate. Guided Long Range (GLR) - fully guided ammunition via GPS and IMU (Inertial Measurement Unit). The bullet is fired up to a height of 25 km where it is guided by the IMU system constantly updated by the GPS continuing at supersonic speed with a constant angle of descent. The last phase of the flight takes place in nosedive on the target. The concept of the new munitions family "Vulcano" has been developed by Leonardo-OTO Melara of La Spezia and provides for an under-calibrated non self-propelled ammunition equipped, in the guided version, with aerodynamic governments, inertial navigation/GPS and, in some subtypes, with a terminal guidance system, characterized by a very high range and a very high accuracy (CEP < 20m). A first differentiation between ammunition that is being developed under the Program can be made between unguided and guided ammunition, called Extended Range and Long Range respectively. The calibers under development are 155mm in the land version and 127mm in the naval version. The trajectory of unguided ammunition is conventional ballistic ammunition with a range of up to 70 km, while the range of the guided versions will reach 100 km when fired from cannon cal. 127/54C and 120 km when fired from the new cannon cal. 127/64LW. For the cal. 155mm the expected range is up to 100 km. These ranges will be achievable thanks to a very high initial velocity of the bullets and very low aerodynamic coefficients when compared to those of large caliber ammunition in service. The projectiles are equipped with a multi-function fuse, based on microwave technology and programmable with altimetric, proximity, impact, delayed impact or time functionality. The main difference in the terrestrial versions, apart from the calibre, is the different configuration of the propellant assembly, specifically designed to ensure total compatibility with the PzH2000 self-propelled howitzer loading system.
Matsimus !!! Thank You for another incredibly informative video!! What do I mean by that? 1) The FH70 makes an awfull lot of sense in conjunction with Your 105 mm! The main difference is that the 105 mm is deployable/placeable with a Merlin (Cormorant to You nutcases) helicopter. Now the 105 mm. makes an awfull lot of sense - if it can be fired from a PREPARED position with some timber logs to catch shell fragments. Such prepared positions are easy to make and comparatively cheap - given you have a wooded area. If you need to change position - then have 5(?) prepared for each gun. If they cost next to nothing it can be done. 2) I have noted that Denmark/Norway/Holland have formed a "Special Forces Command". Now Holland has 15 of these FH70 in wartime reserve. Where you can deploy a 105 mm with a Merlin, that can carry 5½ tons underslung. The 105 mm weighs 2½ tons. The problem is then: The FH70 weighs 9½ tons and there is no way on Gods green earth a Merlin will be able to haul that: That needs a Chinook. Strangely enough Holland has 155 mm FH-70 AND Chinooks. 3) Now there is something called tactics. If the 155 mm can cover a withdrawal of the 105 mm with base bleed munition (and the crew is in a level 2 protected vehicle - alternatively blow up the gun and have spares in the prepared positions for the 155 mm - as long as you get the crew out). Then the 105 mm. can cover the withdrawal of the 155 mm. 4) During the cold war the Soviet problem was NOT finding the proposed sites for the Pershing II and cruise missiles: They knew to a meter precisely where they were! That was only what was to be expected with so many traitors and informants. Nope! The problem was the sheer number of proposed sites. If you have to cover - say - 5 sites with artillery or nukes then you in effect rain terror over a lot of dummies - and run out of ammo. 5) The problem with the tactics is you need a divisional command to control such a force - which just might be the reason why such an animal is formed in Latvia? Pure guesswork on my behalf - I have a vivid imagination. Am I inadvertently giving a deep military secret away? Possibly! Only problem with that is: If the dear ruskie bastards haven't figured it out, they are so stupid that they better commit suicide before their own firing squad catches up with them. We KNOW there is a traitor in the Defence Committee in Denmark and in the Army command (has just recieved a 2 month prison sentence for banging not a canon, but his mistress promoted to major). Do the ruskies think we are so stupid, that we have not thouht of the possibilty of such a contingency? "How big an idiot do you have to be to be a member of the Russian Intelligence?" That is a slight rephrasing of the economist Jean Robinsons scorn over one of the times the enviromentalists had a holy grail - in that instance called the Rome Club (most of You will be to young to remember that particular stupidity). Why do the russians think, that a tactic on their part that allready has failed abyssmally should be a success the second time around? But if I on the available public information is able to produce a tactic from my posterior - maybe they should reconsider their war plan regroup and kill some russian generals? Just a suggestion......
Thanks for the great report Matt. This weapon served honourably for 40 years. Unfortunately, it looks like a sitting duck in 2020. It can't shoot and scoot like a self-propelled. Seeing all those stationary gunners potentially exposed to a Russian or Chinese long-range missile barrage, or air strike, is not a good thing. If it can be exported to countries that are not confronted by a near-peer opponent, that is a big win.
20 years ago, a retired Major told me the reverse azimuth on incoming shells could be quickly calculated. He commanded mobile units that fired a few rounds then rapidly moved before the enemy could hit their location.
There are radar systems like COBRA (e.g. used by Germany, France and the UK) that determine from where the artillery shells, mortar rounds or rockets were fired and of course this information would then be shared with one’s own artillery and rocket artillery to fire at this position.
@@HingerlAlois Exactly the reason unarmored, towed artillery is obsolete imho. Sure, you can use them to shoot up some rebels from the inside of a base, but counterfire is real and fast.
Servi de 76/78 em uma Unidade de Antiaérea e tinha uma peça acho que de 150mm tem uma parte da canção da Artilharia ( Quer de Costa Antiaerea ou de Campanha eu Domino no Mar no Céu na Terra Quer no Forte no Campo ou na Montanha Vibra mais no Canhão a Voz da Guerra) Saudações Antiaéreas
Hi Matt thanks for keep posting videos during this hard time. Anyway if you don't mind me asking, what happen to most of your video? I was trying to watch your older armored vehicle reviews on the playlist "military equipment, tanks, combat equipment" but most of those videos aren't longer available. Cheers Matt
I worked on this 30 odd years ago. tri national build. Italy (Sights) UK (Trail legs and Hydraulics ) Germany (Ordnance and APU) And guess which bits went tits up most often ? Correct the British built bits !We also became the only 19 gun regt in BAOR for a brief time. We had a gun in LAD which we couldn't get parts for (Trail leg I think or a Jockey wheel) Anyway it sat in LAD so long it was cannabilised to repair other guns. Some bright spark thought it was a good idea to just demand a new gun . AFG 890 duly submitted , Jolly jape chaps chuckle chuckle ...and it was, until the new Gun FH 70 complete as per CES actually turned up ! Which was nice , until RAOC decided they wanted the old one back !!! Carnage !!! We literally rebuilt it from nuts and bolts I still have a photo of me and another Gun God with an ISPL and a box of bits on a bench. This would have been about 1983.
I actually don't see where the M777 is "superior" to the FH-70. The FH-70 is motorized and can move on its own - the M777 can't. The FH-70 looks like it can be operated by 4-5 crew. The M777 needs 4 people just to adjust the gun elevation and traverse and another 4 to load a shell(there are always 10 people standing around an M777). The FH-70 can be built in different countries, the M777 is mostly and only built in the USA. Both are 155mm 39 caliber length(except for the experimental M777ER), M777 has more accessories, but those could be added to the FH-70. Long range ammunition likely can also be used on the FH-70. So for Europeans the FH-70 would be a better choice, assuming it can still be produced.
I use to be the number 7 on this back in 88, it steers via a paddle valve and if you don't re Centre the trail wheels it would just go around in circles so you had to constantly tap it left and right to keep going in a straight line!! Uk 45 fld regt RA Colchester
Because that was the time where the MacNammera ideology came into being. Focus on air mobility, high speed, and high tech to augment soldiers. In some ways built off of the 'nuke Army' doctrine but without nukes flying everywhere.
From a British viewpoint, McNamara was a Mug! Sure you can fill out the Infantry with dumb and unmotivated Kids, if you don't care about Casualties, However other Branches such as Engineers, Artillery, Logistics, Armour, You need Professionals, Intelligent, Dedicated People who see the Military as their Future and are willing to do 15-22 Years
Shoot and scoot. When you are fighting Soviets or Russians, being able to move the thing quickly after a few shots is a matter of survival. They have lots and lots of long range artillery for counter battery fire, and radars that tell them exactly from where you have been shooting from. You need to be gone from the zone of impact before that fire comes down on your old position. Back in the 80s, the FH 70 could do that well enough (esp the improved German version that could get out 3 rounds in 8 seconds with a semi autoloader). Of course, nowadays we are talking thermobaric weapons and cluster ammunitions where the Russians are concerned, flattening whole map grid squares with a single salvo. They took out entire mech inf battallions of the Ukrainians that way. Plodding along with an APU doesnt really cut it any longer in such an environment (but is still better than simple towed arty, which is why the Estonians got some for cheap). Which is why Germany completely replaced the FH70 with the PzH2000 (and MARS), and why Lithuania spent the money necessary to also get 12 PzHs. ruclips.net/video/dnvBkalVtJg/видео.html
Those things can still put a lot of HE where you want and do a lot damage once it gets there. With something like a 20 mile range not everyone is going to have something handy to swat it for doing so either.
Remember my Fex with 154 battery field artillery of the Royal dutch army in 97 i was added to replace a 10 ton munitions driver/worker and went on a two weeks exercise with this unit at Münster süd. The unit used the M114 originally but acquired the Fh70 to prevent them from wearing fast. The Volkswagen Beetle engine on the gun was a nice feature all German. 😉
Spend hours on my class 1 course in 1980 Boredom (Bordon) learning about the Foden Gun tractor for but never worked on it and the FH70 went out of service very quickly.
Good piece of kit but had its day, I'm sure the Yanks many Client States in Dusty places will be very happy to receive them in Military Aid over the next few Years
Iv always wondered. The explosions artillery make are fairly small (relative to where the enemy could be). And they shoot fairly slowly. So how are they so affective at taking out the enemy at such a long range?
The visible fireball of an explosion is inversely proportional to the damage potential of a conventional shell. Movie explosions are spectacular using gasoline, propane and flour with low power civilian explosives to give a big fireball that doesn't endanger the film crew or stunt actors. A 155mm shell weighs around 40-50kg with enough high explosives to turn a two floor brick building into so much rubble in less than a second. Also, modern fuses commonly detonates shells up to 8m above ground to shower the ground in a cone of fragments and shrapnel to reach entrenched troops. They can alternatively be set to detonate milliseconds after impact to get at troops inside fortified buildings. A modern howitzer also fire that shell up to 50km. WW1 artillery rarely fired over 8km
Here's a video of what it looks like at the reciving end of a proximity fused barrage feom a different but comparable 155mm artillery system. ruclips.net/video/n2OgwHCVFYM/видео.html This is filmed from about a km away from the impact zone.
That view of the impacts can be confusing due to trees in the foreground. See those small box like structures in the impact area? Those are shipping containers...
According to the Serbian nomenclature, there are: 1. Towed artillery 2. Self-propelled artillery 3. Self-moved artillery FH 77 is self-moved artillery and it is technological dead end. That means it is obsolete. It can be used against armies of the same or lower technological level.
Question for the artillerists in the audience - what's with the kneeling away from the gun while firing? What is that in aid of? I remember something about air pressure, but not clearly.
Hey Matt, the GV6 and GV5 are very interesting medium howitzers and would make a good video. They are also some of the most potent pieces in their class
I'd like to think i know a thing or 2 about small arms, but allmost nothing about artilley. But first time I see an artillery piece being loaded like a battleship: first a projectile and then a bag of propellant instead of a shell (which ejects after each shot) Does a "regular" howitzer use a shell or the projectile+propellant combination?
One assumes that big gun mobility is absolutely required these days to permit avoidance of highly accurate computerized counter-battery fire. Despite the APU and howitser 'driveability'!!!???. Presently and more so in future the existence and deployment of drones and other GPS capable UAVs mandates instant mobility which will be at a premium for survivability.
I do agree with most parts, I do believe towed have a part to play, depending a. Who you fight. B. You have stealth with towed systems and transport alternative. You also can dig those systems in, hard to destroy unless direct hit.
um spark diesel ? I thought diesel engines used compression ignition , is there more info on this ? what is being ejected at the end of requile I did not see anything, nor any casings ? why dos it take so much pumping to rais the breach with a hydraulic system ? is that just for elevating the barle and traversing the gun
I couldn't find much on it other then the Military-Today .com listing that said pretty much the same thing "The APU is a Volkswagen Model 127 1.8-liter diesel motor, with 4 cylinders in a "boxer" configuration. It is air-cooled, spark-ignited, and produces up to 71 hp at 80 rpm"
I worked on this early 90s, Jesus I was fit as a butchers dog, you needed to be strong and be alert, this bitch could hurt you, fingers crushed etc. VW engine to self propel it into a final position, it could get bogged down really easy, you could achieve high rates of fire with a good crew, the guys loved working on it. Do a vid if the L118 105mm Light Gun!! Stay safe mate! #UBIQUE
With the increasing ability of our adversaries to calculate effective counter battery fire the need to. Shoot and scoot is becoming the norm for artilliary
This is a pretty crazy coincidence. I was thinking earlier today if Germany stilled used any traditional artillery pieces and found the FH-70. Then you post a video on it 3 hours later
Germany retired its traditional artillery from service (apart from some 105mm howitzers for saluting). The Bundeswehr has currently the 155mm Panzerhaubitze 2000 self-propelled howitzer, the MARS II (MLRS) and 120mm mortars (either mounted on and fired from M113 APCs or transported by the light Wolf vehicles).
This gun and others like it will still be held in reserve for decades in case SHTF and hundreds of brigades/divisions/regiments and thousands of battalions and smaller units are required WW2 style but without needing years to the kit, I wonder how many battalions equipt to a reasonable level could be raised today from reserve equipment with some new equipment topping off older Reserve stored kit if an allied military force needed to be raised quickly in a world war scenario, That would be an interesting vid.
SP is a necessity as what was old is new again. Counter battery and the need for shooting and scooting is at the forefront again. Tracked, wheeled, mounted in the back of a pickup with a flatbed trailer for ammo who cares if it moves it lives to shoot again. Getting rid of our M109s in Canada was/is/ will be a mistake.
How you belt feed a system that uses 2 parts ? Different loads etc ? Shells that can weight from 50 to 76 kg ? Using different fuses. Those are howitzers not cannons
Matsimus, I'd love to hear your opinion on the new "frag" grenade the US military is considering, or is it a done deal? IMO it one of those things that look goid on paper, but the idea of adding this level of complexity to something as simple as a grenade, seems insane. It has an adjustible timing fuse, and can be switched between frag and concussion.
I didn't believe my eyes until I saw the flag on the sleeve. THE FOOTAGE IS FROM ESTONIA, my homeland.
Theres a estonia youtuber who is a soldier,his name is Arthur Rehi
My favorite VPN country!
Tiberiu Nicolae in Estonia 1248% of the population are watching porn at any one time
It was filmed during 2015 operation Siil.
Hello you people are ruling the United States of America 🇺🇸 saludos
0:31 not my proudest moment as a loader. The slope was wet and muddy... not suitable for quick footwork.
Lmao, I saw that...
I was wondering how many would notice
I saw that too, reminded me of the first time I had sex.
When I shot 777s I slipped and fell off it between rounds in the rain once, happens to us all.
Don't worry, in training I knocked the fire leaver on a 105 Light Gun just as the breech closed and the loaded had his clenched hand behind the breech block, did not expect the recoil so soon.
In the Eighties as 1 st Lt, I served with the FH70 in the oldest Italian artillery regiment (from 1851until today). Maybe because they were still quite new but we did not encounter all those reliability problems mentioned in the video. A notable element was the speed when towed. We trained in continuous changes of position, so as to escape a possible counter battery fire, without wasting time hooking to the tractors, the ability of autonomous movement was very appreciated. In off road it was maybe a little funny, especially when the plate was rocking and ringing like a bell, but fast enough.
@Amir Me Russia delenda est.
@Amir Me Your dream is the shortest way to join Hitler, Putin, Saddam, and bin Laden in hell. I advise you to rush.
@Amir Me I see, putin's zombie bot without knowledge of English is posting here.
I'll never forget driving fast in convoy with howitzers in tow back in the 60s. No GPS, all maps and survey instruments (theodolites) and forward observers. Set up fire control, survey in the howitzers, and fire spotter rounds. When on target, fire battery for effect. I did both forward observer and fire control jobs as an officer.
I was part of the Battery that ran the trials in the UK. This would have been in 1978 - It was a very capable Howitzer - We had Foden Trucks to pull them. We easily achieved 6 rounds a minute with a well trained crew of six. We were not use to the semi automatic loading and some guys lost a finger in the first six months. In fact I remember one display at Larkhill where we drove on to the stand, deployed and fired six rounds, and started to drive off before the first round loaded on the impact area (about 30 seconds). Direct fire on tanks took off the turret with HE shell and no need for a HESH development 🙂
I was an apprentice fitter and worked on the first prototype in Vickers, Barrow - In - Furness, England, in 1969. Fabulous to know they're still being used 50 years later. Not a bad gun I think.
Girls first car: Honda Civic
Boys first car: FH-70 155mm Towed Howitzer
Only 155?
I drive a 180
Bruh I drive 230 mm Tyulpan
Well I said that was my first car, i currently got a Karl Gerät 600mm mortar. Parking's never a problem since there's always enough space, just don't worry about the cars in that space.
@@kaptainkrafter4130 I'm sorry, you are the alpha male
Piss off, I got a Dora canon imported from Germany. I own the railways now.
I really liked this gun....greetings from the former german Mountain Artillery Battalion 225
Where are you now?
@@LuckySoaringTiger probably somewhere in europe
Achtung baby! Sorry, it’s the only German language phrase I know! That and LUFTWAFFE and 99 LUFT BALLOONS. LOL! I likely know much more than that, considering English is an offshoot of German. “English” itself is formed from “Anglo-Saxon”, and the Angles and Saxons were from, roughly, Denmark and parts of Germany. Or so I’ve read. I’d love to learn German. Fortunately, many Germans (and much of the world), speak English! It embarrasses me, but in my defense, what incentive do I have to learn a foreign language when most everyone else speaks or understands English? Further in my defense, rarely do I come across Germans. Mexicans, on the other hand, are forever amongst me. So I speak Spanish, well enough.
@@spidermight8054 oooooooookkkkk
0:31 poor guy tripped lol
Just oopsy and back up again.
Well i mean the thing he is holding is kind of heavy
Ground was muddy from previous rain. Loading rod was not impossibly heavy but quite cumbersome.
WindHaze10 was that you? Don’t worry about it stuff happens. Must be a cool experience working up close and personal with those big guns.
Already shipped to Ukraine and beats rashists.Thanks Italy .💛💙
I work for the company who made the UK version. still repaired them until about 2 years ago.
Every time I hear towed howitzer, I'm hearing toad howitzer
You just want a rebate rebate 😃😃
Tod Howard
This harkens me back to 1954 when I joined a US Marine Reserve unit which had a single, 155mm "Long Tom" gun. The gun could be fired in either direct fire mode or as a howitzer and had a range of 24,000 yards or 22 km when firing a 100 pound armor piercing round. By the time I went on active duty in 1956 the reserve unit was equipped with a huge 155mm self propelled gun, but I don't recall much about it.
Guten Abend an der FH-70 war ich Richtkanonier zu meiner Bundeswehr zeit 1986 .Danke fûr das Video . Grüße aus Nürnberg.Deutschland
My service time was on this gun.
Hydraulic failure did occure on my gun during manouvers.
Always wanted tracked artillery. PZH2000 or even M109 would have been fine.
Living in the winter mud was not fun.
Army time was a lifetime experience, but frankly wasted time.
Getting up early, then doing nothing, mostly sitting and waiting for lunch or dinner time.
All in the 2000s, so no www.
In '82-'83,,I was on special duty in the national guard,,too hard to describe,, here,,my platoon of M48A5's were going up a hill,,just before we crested,,,,BOOM!!,,BOOM!!,,BOOM!!....A battery of 175's LET LOOSE!!...We were in no REAL danger,,but if you think being BEHIND one of those HITS you in the FACE!,, YOU HAVE NOOOO IDEA!!!! We hung out for a while,,watching and LISTENING to the shells flying to the impact area...SOOO COOOL!!!
Very informative Video, and brings back some memories. My Bundeswehr service time in the late eighties was on this gun (Feldartilleriebataillon 21).
would like to hear, see a review on the G5 155
The better one that could move around on its own... :)
My thoughts exactly @Ian Cockcorft
Junk 198 is king
huh? i googled JUNk 155 field artiillery. it came back with the M198. same thing?? :)
Joke.
its a decent system, but doesnt come close to the G5. misses by about 15km.(Maximum firing range 30km vs 45km, and thats without rocket assisted ammo)
Does it also have an auxillary power system to allow it to be driven into position?
on what points do you think is better?
I know the m777 is preferred because of the high tech systems, but I prefer the lower tech stuff. I find them much more durable and reliable.
Ammunition
The new projectiles conformed to the Quadrilateral Ballistics Agreement between US, UK, Germany and Italy. In essence, this meant a shell with the same shape and dimensions as the US M549 rocket-assisted projectile. The standard HE shell (UK designation L15) is a thin wall design weighing 43.5 kg and containing 11.3 kg of HE. This remains the largest HE load for a standard 155mm shell.
The propellant system comprises three different bagged cartridges with triple-base propellant. Cartridge 1 gives charges 1 & 2, Cartridge 2 give charges 3-7 and Cartridge 3 is charge 8, which gives a maximum range under standard conditions of 24.7 km.
Each nation developed its own fuzes and ammunition packaging. In the UK's case, this led to the Unit Load Container carrying 17 complete rounds, including shells with fuzes fitted - a novelty for 155 mm.
Standard US pattern 155 mm ammunition can also be fired, although US primers proved problematic for the primer magazine and feed due to their variation in size.
VOLCANO MUNITION
Under the name Vulcano, the Italian company Leonardo-Oto Melara has identified a new family of bullets for its 127mm naval cannon also in the 64 calibre version and for the 155 mm howitzers, both the trailed Fh-70 cannon and those that equip the self-propelled M109 and PzH 2000; these bullets have the characteristic of having an extended range compared to traditional ammunition of the same calibre and, for some versions, a guidance system that allows precision attacks against naval or land targets.
The same projectile can be fired from different calibres (127 mm and 155 mm) as it is undercalibrated and cambered by means of disposable spacers in the same way as APFSDS projectiles, the precise denomination for this type of ammunition is HEFSDS (High Explosives Fin Stabilized Discarding Sabot), i.e. a high explosiveness, fin stabilized, casing abandonment projectile.
The ammunition consists of two sections, with the front component with canard fins and the rear part with spacer fins. The front part contains the warhead and has 6 fins. In all, the bullet weighs about 20 kg with 2.5 kg of explosive.
The ammunition will be of 3 types:
Ballistic Extended Range (BER) - basic unguided version that can reach 70 km and can be used against any type of naval, land or air targets.
Guided Long Range (GLR) - anti-ship version guided in the final by an infrared (IR) sensor that starts searching for the target at a distance of 6 km and at an altitude of 2.5 km. It can reach 70 km or even 90 km if fired from the 64 gauge barrel. The warhead explodes after penetrating the hull of the target ship. Oto Melara indicates a "kill probability" of 80% with the first shot against a ship the size of a frigate.
Guided Long Range (GLR) - fully guided ammunition via GPS and IMU (Inertial Measurement Unit). The bullet is fired up to a height of 25 km where it is guided by the IMU system constantly updated by the GPS continuing at supersonic speed with a constant angle of descent. The last phase of the flight takes place in nosedive on the target.
The concept of the new munitions family "Vulcano" has been developed by Leonardo-OTO Melara of La Spezia and provides for an under-calibrated non self-propelled ammunition equipped, in the guided version, with aerodynamic governments, inertial navigation/GPS and, in some subtypes, with a terminal guidance system, characterized by a very high range and a very high accuracy (CEP < 20m).
A first differentiation between ammunition that is being developed under the Program can be made between unguided and guided ammunition, called Extended Range and Long Range respectively. The calibers under development are 155mm in the land version and 127mm in the naval version.
The trajectory of unguided ammunition is conventional ballistic ammunition with a range of up to 70 km, while the range of the guided versions will reach 100 km when fired from cannon cal. 127/54C and 120 km when fired from the new cannon cal. 127/64LW. For the cal. 155mm the expected range is up to 100 km. These ranges will be achievable thanks to a very high initial velocity of the bullets and very low aerodynamic coefficients when compared to those of large caliber ammunition in service. The projectiles are equipped with a multi-function fuse, based on microwave technology and programmable with altimetric, proximity, impact, delayed impact or time functionality.
The main difference in the terrestrial versions, apart from the calibre, is the different configuration of the propellant assembly, specifically designed to ensure total compatibility with the PzH2000 self-propelled howitzer loading system. Ammunition
The new projectiles conformed to the Quadrilateral Ballistics Agreement between US, UK, Germany and Italy. In essence, this meant a shell with the same shape and dimensions as the US M549 rocket-assisted projectile. The standard HE shell (UK designation L15) is a thin wall design weighing 43.5 kg and containing 11.3 kg of HE. This remains the largest HE load for a standard 155mm shell.
The propellant system comprises three different bagged cartridges with triple-base propellant. Cartridge 1 gives charges 1 & 2, Cartridge 2 give charges 3-7 and Cartridge 3 is charge 8, which gives a maximum range under standard conditions of 24.7 km.
Each nation developed its own fuzes and ammunition packaging. In the UK's case, this led to the Unit Load Container carrying 17 complete rounds, including shells with fuzes fitted - a novelty for 155 mm.
Standard US pattern 155 mm ammunition can also be fired, although US primers proved problematic for the primer magazine and feed due to their variation in size.
VOLCANO MUNITION
Under the name Vulcano, the Italian company Leonardo-Oto Melara has identified a new family of bullets for its 127mm naval cannon also in the 64 calibre version and for the 155 mm howitzers, both the trailed Fh-70 cannon and those that equip the self-propelled M109 and PzH 2000; these bullets have the characteristic of having an extended range compared to traditional ammunition of the same calibre and, for some versions, a guidance system that allows precision attacks against naval or land targets.
The same projectile can be fired from different calibres (127 mm and 155 mm) as it is undercalibrated and cambered by means of disposable spacers in the same way as APFSDS projectiles, the precise denomination for this type of ammunition is HEFSDS (High Explosives Fin Stabilized Discarding Sabot), i.e. a high explosiveness, fin stabilized, casing abandonment projectile.
The ammunition consists of two sections, with the front component with canard fins and the rear part with spacer fins. The front part contains the warhead and has 6 fins. In all, the bullet weighs about 20 kg with 2.5 kg of explosive.
The ammunition will be of 3 types:
Ballistic Extended Range (BER) - basic unguided version that can reach 70 km and can be used against any type of naval, land or air targets.
Guided Long Range (GLR) - anti-ship version guided in the final by an infrared (IR) sensor that starts searching for the target at a distance of 6 km and at an altitude of 2.5 km. It can reach 70 km or even 90 km if fired from the 64 gauge barrel. The warhead explodes after penetrating the hull of the target ship. Oto Melara indicates a "kill probability" of 80% with the first shot against a ship the size of a frigate.
Guided Long Range (GLR) - fully guided ammunition via GPS and IMU (Inertial Measurement Unit). The bullet is fired up to a height of 25 km where it is guided by the IMU system constantly updated by the GPS continuing at supersonic speed with a constant angle of descent. The last phase of the flight takes place in nosedive on the target.
The concept of the new munitions family "Vulcano" has been developed by Leonardo-OTO Melara of La Spezia and provides for an under-calibrated non self-propelled ammunition equipped, in the guided version, with aerodynamic governments, inertial navigation/GPS and, in some subtypes, with a terminal guidance system, characterized by a very high range and a very high accuracy (CEP < 20m).
A first differentiation between ammunition that is being developed under the Program can be made between unguided and guided ammunition, called Extended Range and Long Range respectively. The calibers under development are 155mm in the land version and 127mm in the naval version.
The trajectory of unguided ammunition is conventional ballistic ammunition with a range of up to 70 km, while the range of the guided versions will reach 100 km when fired from cannon cal. 127/54C and 120 km when fired from the new cannon cal. 127/64LW. For the cal. 155mm the expected range is up to 100 km. These ranges will be achievable thanks to a very high initial velocity of the bullets and very low aerodynamic coefficients when compared to those of large caliber ammunition in service. The projectiles are equipped with a multi-function fuse, based on microwave technology and programmable with altimetric, proximity, impact, delayed impact or time functionality.
The main difference in the terrestrial versions, apart from the calibre, is the different configuration of the propellant assembly, specifically designed to ensure total compatibility with the PzH2000 self-propelled howitzer loading system.
Matsimus !!!
Thank You for another incredibly informative video!!
What do I mean by that?
1) The FH70 makes an awfull lot of sense in conjunction with Your 105 mm!
The main difference is that the 105 mm is deployable/placeable with a Merlin (Cormorant to You nutcases) helicopter.
Now the 105 mm. makes an awfull lot of sense - if it can be fired from a PREPARED position with some timber logs to catch shell fragments. Such prepared positions are easy to make and comparatively cheap - given you have a wooded area. If you need to change position - then have 5(?) prepared for each gun. If they cost next to nothing it can be done.
2) I have noted that Denmark/Norway/Holland have formed a "Special Forces Command". Now Holland has 15 of these FH70 in wartime reserve. Where you can deploy a 105 mm with a Merlin, that can carry 5½ tons underslung. The 105 mm weighs 2½ tons. The problem is then: The FH70 weighs 9½ tons and there is no way on Gods green earth a Merlin will be able to haul that: That needs a Chinook.
Strangely enough Holland has 155 mm FH-70 AND Chinooks.
3) Now there is something called tactics.
If the 155 mm can cover a withdrawal of the 105 mm with base bleed munition (and the crew is in a level 2 protected vehicle - alternatively blow up the gun and have spares in the prepared positions for the 155 mm - as long as you get the crew out).
Then the 105 mm. can cover the withdrawal of the 155 mm.
4) During the cold war the Soviet problem was NOT finding the proposed sites for the Pershing II and cruise missiles: They knew to a meter precisely where they were! That was only what was to be expected with so many traitors and informants. Nope! The problem was the sheer number of proposed sites. If you have to cover - say - 5 sites with artillery or nukes then you in effect rain terror over a lot of dummies - and run out of ammo.
5) The problem with the tactics is you need a divisional command to control such a force - which just might be the reason why such an animal is formed in Latvia? Pure guesswork on my behalf - I have a vivid imagination.
Am I inadvertently giving a deep military secret away? Possibly! Only problem with that is: If the dear ruskie bastards haven't figured it out, they are so stupid that they better commit suicide before their own firing squad catches up with them.
We KNOW there is a traitor in the Defence Committee in Denmark and in the Army command (has just recieved a 2 month prison sentence for banging not a canon, but his mistress promoted to major).
Do the ruskies think we are so stupid, that we have not thouht of the possibilty of such a contingency?
"How big an idiot do you have to be to be a member of the Russian Intelligence?"
That is a slight rephrasing of the economist Jean Robinsons scorn over one of the times the enviromentalists had a holy grail - in that instance called the Rome Club (most of You will be to young to remember that particular stupidity).
Why do the russians think, that a tactic on their part that allready has failed abyssmally should be a success the second time around?
But if I on the available public information is able to produce a tactic from my posterior - maybe they should reconsider their war plan regroup and kill some russian generals? Just a suggestion......
in 2020 trials began
for 155 Volcano with estimate 100 km distance more or less like himars
Fun fact about this gun. The JGSDF version has Subaru's 1800cc for APU.
Egypt is using & producing the Finish artillery GH-52 APU 155mmm
As a cannoneer I've never heard of this gun thanks for the video
excellent video, can you do a video explaining how old school howitzers like this are aimed?
Actually you use compass, peg a line determine location, using math. Be pretty boring video.
U used topography, math, tables data lookup, wheather info, intelligence info from the front line & etc.
Thanks for the great report Matt. This weapon served honourably for 40 years. Unfortunately, it looks like a sitting duck in 2020. It can't shoot and scoot like a self-propelled. Seeing all those stationary gunners potentially exposed to a Russian or Chinese long-range missile barrage, or air strike, is not a good thing. If it can be exported to countries that are not confronted by a near-peer opponent, that is a big win.
Actually it is designed to shoot and scoot. That's why it has the engine.
20 years ago, a retired Major told me the reverse azimuth on incoming shells could be quickly calculated. He commanded mobile units that fired a few rounds then rapidly moved before the enemy could hit their location.
There are radar systems like COBRA (e.g. used by Germany, France and the UK) that determine from where the artillery shells, mortar rounds or rockets were fired and of course this information would then be shared with one’s own artillery and rocket artillery to fire at this position.
@@HingerlAlois Exactly the reason unarmored, towed artillery is obsolete imho. Sure, you can use them to shoot up some rebels from the inside of a base, but counterfire is real and fast.
@@Guhonter Still real in Ukraine.
Hello, a very good Video. Only one mistake the german FH70 has a gasoline engine. 100% not a diesel.
Servi de 76/78 em uma Unidade de Antiaérea e tinha uma peça acho que de 150mm tem uma parte da canção da Artilharia ( Quer de Costa Antiaerea ou de Campanha eu Domino no Mar no Céu na Terra Quer no Forte no Campo ou na Montanha Vibra mais no Canhão a Voz da Guerra) Saudações Antiaéreas
Hi Matt thanks for keep posting videos during this hard time. Anyway if you don't mind me asking, what happen to most of your video? I was trying to watch your older armored vehicle reviews on the playlist "military equipment, tanks, combat equipment" but most of those videos aren't longer available. Cheers Matt
Was wonderin the same thing too
I worked on this 30 odd years ago. tri national build. Italy (Sights) UK (Trail legs and Hydraulics ) Germany (Ordnance and APU) And guess which bits went tits up most often ? Correct the British built bits !We also became the only 19 gun regt in BAOR for a brief time. We had a gun in LAD which we couldn't get parts for (Trail leg I think or a Jockey wheel) Anyway it sat in LAD so long it was cannabilised to repair other guns. Some bright spark thought it was a good idea to just demand a new gun . AFG 890 duly submitted , Jolly jape chaps chuckle chuckle ...and it was, until the new Gun FH 70 complete as per CES actually turned up ! Which was nice , until RAOC decided they wanted the old one back !!! Carnage !!! We literally rebuilt it from nuts and bolts I still have a photo of me and another Gun God with an ISPL and a box of bits on a bench. This would have been about 1983.
Yeah when they fire off the electronics killer bombs all them hightech guns will be worthless
I actually don't see where the M777 is "superior" to the FH-70.
The FH-70 is motorized and can move on its own - the M777 can't.
The FH-70 looks like it can be operated by 4-5 crew. The M777 needs 4 people just to adjust the gun elevation and traverse and another 4 to load a shell(there are always 10 people standing around an M777).
The FH-70 can be built in different countries, the M777 is mostly and only built in the USA.
Both are 155mm 39 caliber length(except for the experimental M777ER), M777 has more accessories, but those could be added to the FH-70. Long range ammunition likely can also be used on the FH-70. So for Europeans the FH-70 would be a better choice, assuming it can still be produced.
Not to be confused with similar Bofors FH-77 xD
FH-77 is a lot better though, in both towed and wheeled SPG version.
Yes it's comes in a cardboard box that you need to assemble your self.
@@TheJavaowl Using just one hex key.
Can you do one on FH77?
I use to be the number 7 on this back in 88, it steers via a paddle valve and if you don't re Centre the trail wheels it would just go around in circles so you had to constantly tap it left and right to keep going in a straight line!! Uk 45 fld regt RA Colchester
西ドイツとフランスとの共同開発した唯一成功した火砲
Interesting to see them not swabbing the chamber between rounds.
Because that was the time where the MacNammera ideology came into being. Focus on air mobility, high speed, and high tech to augment soldiers. In some ways built off of the 'nuke Army' doctrine but without nukes flying everywhere.
From a British viewpoint, McNamara was a Mug! Sure you can fill out the Infantry with dumb and unmotivated Kids, if you don't care about Casualties, However other Branches such as Engineers, Artillery, Logistics, Armour, You need Professionals, Intelligent, Dedicated People who see the Military as their Future and are willing to do 15-22 Years
@@bremnersghost948 the peasants sure did serve their purpose 😉
This is a lot of manpower for one gun.
Shoot and scoot.
When you are fighting Soviets or Russians, being able to move the thing quickly after a few shots is a matter of survival. They have lots and lots of long range artillery for counter battery fire, and radars that tell them exactly from where you have been shooting from. You need to be gone from the zone of impact before that fire comes down on your old position. Back in the 80s, the FH 70 could do that well enough (esp the improved German version that could get out 3 rounds in 8 seconds with a semi autoloader).
Of course, nowadays we are talking thermobaric weapons and cluster ammunitions where the Russians are concerned, flattening whole map grid squares with a single salvo. They took out entire mech inf battallions of the Ukrainians that way. Plodding along with an APU doesnt really cut it any longer in such an environment (but is still better than simple towed arty, which is why the Estonians got some for cheap).
Which is why Germany completely replaced the FH70 with the PzH2000 (and MARS), and why Lithuania spent the money necessary to also get 12 PzHs.
ruclips.net/video/dnvBkalVtJg/видео.html
Those things can still put a lot of HE where you want and do a lot damage once it gets there. With something like a 20 mile range not everyone is going to have something handy to swat it for doing so either.
Remember my Fex with 154 battery field artillery of the Royal dutch army in 97 i was added to replace a 10 ton munitions driver/worker and went on a two weeks exercise with this unit at Münster süd.
The unit used the M114 originally but acquired the Fh70 to prevent them from wearing fast.
The Volkswagen Beetle engine on the gun was a nice feature all German. 😉
Going from watching a video on Wojtek the artillery bear, to a video on an artillery piece......perfect.
I have three words for the Brass who want to go fancy high tech: Electro Magnetic Pluse.
It's like the military doesn't spend millions on hardening their electrical systems...oh wait.
I believe we had m 198's when I was In the Marine in 91
with Leonardo's Volcano ammunition it can fire to 70 or even 85km range. So it's not that bad
Spend hours on my class 1 course in 1980 Boredom (Bordon) learning about the Foden Gun tractor for but never worked on it and the FH70 went out of service very quickly.
Good piece of kit but had its day, I'm sure the Yanks many Client States in Dusty places will be very happy to receive them in Military Aid over the next few Years
Iv always wondered. The explosions artillery make are fairly small (relative to where the enemy could be). And they shoot fairly slowly. So how are they so affective at taking out the enemy at such a long range?
HE shells are usually used and can send shrapnel flying for a good distance and is usually what causes most of the casualties
The visible fireball of an explosion is inversely proportional to the damage potential of a conventional shell.
Movie explosions are spectacular using gasoline, propane and flour with low power civilian explosives to give a big fireball that doesn't endanger the film crew or stunt actors.
A 155mm shell weighs around 40-50kg with enough high explosives to turn a two floor brick building into so much rubble in less than a second.
Also, modern fuses commonly detonates shells up to 8m above ground to shower the ground in a cone of fragments and shrapnel to reach entrenched troops.
They can alternatively be set to detonate milliseconds after impact to get at troops inside fortified buildings.
A modern howitzer also fire that shell up to 50km.
WW1 artillery rarely fired over 8km
Here's a video of what it looks like at the reciving end of a proximity fused barrage feom a different but comparable 155mm artillery system.
ruclips.net/video/n2OgwHCVFYM/видео.html
This is filmed from about a km away from the impact zone.
105mm frag range is roughly 100m so scale up for 155mm
That view of the impacts can be confusing due to trees in the foreground. See those small box like structures in the impact area? Those are shipping containers...
Please do a video about the Panzerhaubitze2000
Greetings from Germany
According to the Serbian nomenclature, there are:
1. Towed artillery
2. Self-propelled artillery
3. Self-moved artillery
FH 77 is self-moved artillery and it is technological dead end. That means it is obsolete. It can be used against armies of the same or lower technological level.
As of May 2022, its gone to war in the Ukraine 🇺🇦
The guy that fell over in the intro 😂😂
the reason the us no longer uses it is you have to move after your 3rd volley because the enemy knows where you are
Please make a video too on Bofors/Bae Fh-77B
I wish I could have used this weapon system but at the same time I loved working on the M777A2
Question for the artillerists in the audience - what's with the kneeling away from the gun while firing? What is that in aid of? I remember something about air pressure, but not clearly.
Shock wave
There is an example on the forecourt of a café in Norfolk England. Also a Hunter jet, an Abbot SPG and other fighting vehicles.
The owner of that gun according to rumour doesn't like his brother, who runs the cafe across the road (the A17) at which the gun is said to be aimed.
Hey Matt, the GV6 and GV5 are very interesting medium howitzers and would make a good video. They are also some of the most potent pieces in their class
Hey Mat! When u get a chance if you can sir, could you do a video on the 155 Field Howitzer 77B known as "The bofors gun"
Hey Matt why are almost all of your videos hidden as private?
I'd like to think i know a thing or 2 about small arms, but allmost nothing about artilley.
But first time I see an artillery piece being loaded like a battleship: first a projectile and then a bag of propellant instead of a shell (which ejects after each shot)
Does a "regular" howitzer use a shell or the projectile+propellant combination?
One assumes that big gun mobility is absolutely required these days to permit avoidance of highly accurate computerized counter-battery fire. Despite the APU and howitser 'driveability'!!!???.
Presently and more so in future the existence and deployment of drones and other GPS capable UAVs mandates instant mobility which will be at a premium for survivability.
I do agree with most parts, I do believe towed have a part to play, depending a. Who you fight. B. You have stealth with towed systems and transport alternative. You also can dig those systems in, hard to destroy unless direct hit.
um spark diesel ? I thought diesel engines used compression ignition , is there more info on this ?
what is being ejected at the end of requile I did not see anything, nor any casings ?
why dos it take so much pumping to rais the breach with a hydraulic system ? is that just for elevating the barle and traversing the gun
I couldn't find much on it other then the Military-Today .com listing that said pretty much the same thing "The APU is a Volkswagen Model 127 1.8-liter diesel motor, with 4 cylinders in a "boxer" configuration. It is air-cooled, spark-ignited, and produces up to 71 hp at 80 rpm"
Last time I came this early nearly nobody in the West knew about the city of Vuhan
Hello very well delivered you have a excellent voice, you belong in radio 📻 Matsimus. Saludos Bro
Estonia did also ditch these, will be replaced with K9 Thunder- self propelled howitzers
Canada trialled this gun. Sadly we didn't buy it.
Amazing tool!!
I worked on this early 90s, Jesus I was fit as a butchers dog, you needed to be strong and be alert, this bitch could hurt you, fingers crushed etc. VW engine to self propel it into a final position, it could get bogged down really easy, you could achieve high rates of fire with a good crew, the guys loved working on it. Do a vid if the L118 105mm Light Gun!!
Stay safe mate!
#UBIQUE
Self Propelled artillery is the only way to go. The new counter battery radar systems are just too good. Shoot and Scoot!!!
With the increasing ability of our adversaries to calculate effective counter battery fire the need to. Shoot and scoot is becoming the norm for artilliary
Big guns are the best , this trinket changes history s ; army's hold circles of turff so big guns can chew up the enemy and his pricey toys. Boss
3 rounds a minute?
No that's soldiering.
Kieran Fitzgerald should be 7-8 per minute
Actually good fire rate is 6 rounds/min
@@masdaze we did 8 shots in 55 seconds wtih D-30
@@rihA-g3e but d-30 is 122mm and much easier to use, trust me, i have shot both of them and they d-30 is some good old russian iron
Yeah til they croak from exhaustion!
2 rounds sustained.
Soviet style bombardment 20 30 mins. 5 rds a min ? Nah
@Matsimus Well this post was hidden until today (I have all notifications turned on) just f.y.i.
Hey matt can you do a talk on russian 2S4 tyulpan?
And now in its late days its defending Ukraine from Russian aggression. The task it was designed for 50 years earlier.
Who needs it when you have A-10’s
This is a pretty crazy coincidence. I was thinking earlier today if Germany stilled used any traditional artillery pieces and found the FH-70. Then you post a video on it 3 hours later
Germany retired its traditional artillery from service (apart from some 105mm howitzers for saluting).
The Bundeswehr has currently the 155mm Panzerhaubitze 2000 self-propelled howitzer, the MARS II (MLRS) and 120mm mortars (either mounted on and fired from M113 APCs or transported by the light Wolf vehicles).
This gun and others like it will still be held in reserve for decades in case SHTF and hundreds of brigades/divisions/regiments and thousands of battalions and smaller units are required WW2 style but without needing years to the kit,
I wonder how many battalions equipt to a reasonable level could be raised today from reserve equipment with some new equipment topping off older Reserve stored kit if an allied military force needed to be raised quickly in a world war scenario,
That would be an interesting vid.
You should make it a thing to have a 155 Friday
Hey im early to a matsimus video, this is something i am proud of.
Just wonderin sir mat, why did made your other vids about military equipment private?
SP is a necessity as what was old is new again. Counter battery and the need for shooting and scooting is at the forefront again. Tracked, wheeled, mounted in the back of a pickup with a flatbed trailer for ammo who cares if it moves it lives to shoot again. Getting rid of our M109s in Canada was/is/ will be a mistake.
How does rocket assisted ammo for this thing work?
81 mm mortars will out gun it within 5k but they are still getting decommissioned too
Those things are supposed to be belt fed, that is why they are going by the wayside.
How you belt feed a system that uses 2 parts ? Different loads etc ? Shells that can weight from 50 to 76 kg ? Using different fuses. Those are howitzers not cannons
Do they take turns firing? Or do they keep the slowest guy on the chair cuz that seems like the job I'd want
Do a review on the g6 mobile artilery
Ditched ?
US developed and fielded the M198 , if memory serves, 1970 then deployed 1978.
This Gun was a NATO Baby .
I started out in Arti those shook hard and kept us busy
Is there a version for home defense?
Have you ever seen the canadian artillery wake up video?
Absolute beauty
2nd..thanks Mat. Nice video
Check out the South African G5 and G6 for some real artillery.
Isn't that the kuperjanov infantry battalion of Estonia. Artur Rehi is part of that battalion
No. FH-70 is currently used by the Artillery Battalion of the 1st Infantry Brigade (to be replaced by K9 Thunder). Artur Rehi is a reservist.
Nice video.
Matsimus,
I'd love to hear your opinion on the new "frag" grenade the US military is considering, or is it a done deal?
IMO it one of those things that look goid on paper, but the idea of adding this level of complexity to something as simple as a grenade, seems insane. It has an adjustible timing fuse, and can be switched between frag and concussion.
So it had much the same range as the old 5.5 inch. That was retained in 100 medium because it had nuclear shell capability in days of tac nuke.