What we call Hindu, Buddhists, jain, sikhs weren't very different in past. This distinction has become clear only in last century, mostly because Brits and Indian National Congress lateron wanted to seperate & weaken Hinduism. They also tried to make these Indian social groups fight each other so that foreign religion can have chance to expand its influence.
He made comments for provoking purpose. If he really need to respond he had many regions like Afghhanisthan those destroyed many Buddhist structures. For information thousands of temples in india were destroyed with solid proof. But We want only few of above want to restore.
Budha born in nepal, vedh vyas born in nepal ( who wrote 18 puran, mahabharat). So when people say hindu break sculpture or budhist did then note pali lamgauge that is budhsit sacred langauge spread even from south indian empire that went to south east asia.sanskrit in top and tamil in bottom but pali is the langauge that is in both bramin script thailand, tibet, srilanka and even afgahnistan. The universal langauge of south asia. King of nepal even told mughal army who came to destroy temple and had surender to nepali army that they can stay in nepal and build majid. That is open mindness of hindu kimgs. Reason why even jagarnath puri has a special respect for a king of far away land.
If a buddhist proves that any temple is built over buddhist monasteries. We will definitely give it back with respect. Because we respect and worship buddha also.
The holiest Buddhist stupa built by Ashoka at Bodhgaya known as Mahabodhi Mahavihara is under the Hindu majority board of directors. 5 Hindus and 4 Buddhist and chairman always Hindu. None of Hindu temple, mosques, church and Gurudwara is governed by another religion except Buddhist. Forget about the past. How long Hindus have campaigned for Ram Mandir at Ayodhya?
@@gyadre What do you mean by `None of Hindu temple`? What do you mean by "except"? All Hindu temples are managed by government-controlled bodies, which often include non-Hindu chairpersons or administrators. Care to do a little research before making claims. Did u ever consider asking a Hindu about this? BTW FYI Hindu's places worship's income are just taxed but not of other faith! Hindu’s place of worship income can be used for other purposes but not of other faith!
@@gyadre Please, stop making random claims! We're tired of u guys always bIaming Hindus for everything! This was all started by Kangrass Govt! Go and ask them! We're victims too, and our situation is even more challenging than urs! U r all upset with decision taken by our previous secuIar Govt, but u point ur figer on us! Please make this clear in ur mind that Please make it clear in your mind that "government is not synonymous with Hinduism" (the government is not equal to Hinduism.) It's high time that u stop generalizing and stereotyping the Hindus! We're all done with all of this, to be honest.
@@gyadre Christian individuals have been appointed to the TTD board, which manages the renowned Tirupati Balaji Temple and pilgrimage site, serving as an example for u to verify. Care to verify this! This is just one of several examples we have.
It is nonsensical to say Hindus destroyed budhist temples. The Angkor Thom Temple was a Temple of Brahma which was vandalised by Buddhists. Angkor Vat was also a hindu temple. Budha is not an avatar of Vishnu. In Bodh Gaya , Vishnu sits on Gayasura. Budhism is only hardly 2500 years old. SANATHAN dharma is thousands of years older than budhism.
What we call Hindu, Buddhists, jain, sikhs weren't very different in past. This distinction has become clear only in last century, mostly because Brits and Indian National Congress lateron wanted to seperate & weaken Hinduism. They also tried to make these Indian social groups fight each other so that foreign religion can have chance to expand its influence.
@@nicholasfejer8451Buddha and Gautam Buddh are two different persons. Gautam Buddha is not considered as a recarnation of Vishnu. We worship Gautam Buddha as a great teacher of human kind but not as a Recarnation of Vishnu.
Buddha's written pravachan where he talked about "Dharma Sanatan" in Pali and in Sanskrit language. Jain scriptures states "Dharma Sanatan" just like Ram in Valmiki Ramayan and Krishna in Mahabharat, Bhagvad Geeta, and Shreemad Bhagvata Puranam. Together we call them "Sanatan Dharma", which the domestic and foreign ideology is trying to distinguish to Divide and Destroy.
What we call Hindu, Buddhists, jain, sikhs weren't very different in past. This distinction has become clear only in last century, mostly because Brits and Indian National Congress lateron wanted to seperate & weaken Hinduism. They also tried to make these Indian social groups fight each other so that foreign religion can have chance to expand its influence.
What we call Hindu, Buddhists, jain, sikhs weren't very different in past. This distinction has become clear only in last century, mostly because Brits and Indian National Congress lateron wanted to seperate & weaken Hinduism. They also tried to make these Indian social groups fight each other so that foreign religion can have chance to expand its influence.
@@Behappy11231if u believe all are same u are just not being hindu Whole existence of brilliance of adi shankaraachaary is to defeat nastik buddhist In debates and bringing back hinduism
You are wrong. Buddhism is completely a different religion, entirely different from all other religions. How? One example I would say here. All other religions including Hindu and Islam believe in the existence of soul, but Buddhism doesn't believe its existence. Lord Buddha denies the existence of soul. So it's not easy to understand Buddhism. So please dont say it was a section of Hinduism. It's the only different religion that says there is no soul at all after death.
Please understand Buddhism properly before you talk about it. It's a religion still under research and very complicated to understand. Buddha denies the existence of soul, but accept reincarnation. He also says one can see his Or hers thousands of reincarnations even when that person is alive. Doesn't it sound very peculiar?
Watching this after the tirupati laddu beef prasada news. Free hindu temples should happen soon. Its now or never. Hindus! Join hands. Take the streets. Lets save our Gods who landed on earth for us to guide and do His seva
There were incidences especially in the Kashmir Valley, where a lot of scriptures of Shaivism (Kashmir Shaivism) were taken by Buddhists and taken to China. They are said to be taken to protect them from the Islamic invasion, however not all the incidences were that way.
When oldest hindu idol kalp vigrah was obtained to nepal from a buddhsit monk. That was given to america for study ( university of california). Oldesh vidhnu statue in india is also one such that is found to me made in nepal and kashmir. As both these land have khasas from which nepal kaski district is named ( birth place of vedh vyas author of 18 puran and mahabharat and so on).
Raja Ram Mohan Roy was a converted Christian and he is the person who replaced Sanskrit with English in schools. He is buried in UK in Christian style. So don't take his name again without knowing history
Pranam Sadguru ❤️🙏❤️💪🚩🇮🇳🚩💪 Today ISLAM is NOT wanted any where.. JUSTICE DHARMA is taking shape and effect... EX MUSLIM R HUGE, THIS RELIGION WILL END IN 20 Years ie 2 decades.. AS A HUMAN WE LOVE PEACE. This Religion is kept ALIVE by ISI TURKEY Few Middle East Nation, Nevertheless , We can see Muslim Woman Accepting and Returning Back to SANATAN DHARMA...POWER OF TRUTH AND SANATAN DHARMA 💪🚩🚩🚩💪🙏HARE KRISHNA 🙏💪🇮🇳💪
Take pleasure in the wounds of others is a very bad idea. Well said Sadguru. Thank you. Believe in Devine (Brahma muhurtam) and Wake up in the early morning and become creative and pious. (Santana Dharma).
Buddha says in the Dasarath Jataka about his past life that he was Prince Ramachandra. The deity Vajradhara is similar in concept to Vishnu; the Trikaya doctrine of Buddhism is akin to the Sarguna/Nirguna of Advaita and Sikhism. Even Buddha himself said "eso sanatano dhammo," this teaching of mine is the Sanatana Dharma "discovered by the ancient Brahmins of the past." ALL Dharmics are connected. Islam and its intolerance is the enemy, not our indigenous, tolerant siblings.
All those religions which were born after persecuting and killing others are struggling to survive in this world.we can progress by practicing love, kindness and compassion,not by destroying.
Here is evidence that Hindus destroyed Buddhist viharas: Rupa Gupta and Gautam Gupta, in their book ‘Forgotten Civilizations - The Rediscovery of India's Lost History’ write “Very few people knew that the Keshava deva temple had been built on the site where centuries ago had existed Yasa Vihara, a large Buddhist monastery. It was Sir Alexander Cunningham the pioneer of Indian archaeology who first suggested that Yasa Vihara dated back to the Kushan period. The inscriptions found at the site confirmed that it was in existence even in the days of the Gupta empire. Growse's excavations of ancient mounds in and around Mathura further established Cunningham's theory.”
Let's all fight for our Sanatana Dharma 's existence without any threat to it. If we don't raise our voice and fight for it we will become slaves in our own beautiful country. Let the Hindus unite always.
The way buddhist politicians behave against Sanatan Dharam Religion people, it may have been a blessing in disguise Sanatanis destroying buddhist structures
Brother nice video One thing I learnt is that Humans are continuously evolving History continuously has a new change And anything that is not evolving will remain in history
This question is so silly. Islam MANDATES destroying the Buddha, Shiva, Guru Granth, and all Dharmic gods and gurus. It's a "holy" act of merit. But Hinduism doesn't say destroying the Buddha is virtuous; in fact it's sinful.
Actually many Bhuddist idols were in areas where muslims are living , like Afghanistan , SE Asia etc , so you can expect what will happen to those Bhuddist sculptures. At Nagarjuna konda in AP we preserved many Bhuddist sculptures.
Not just about history but about Historiography & Civilisational Heritage. Cycles of different epochs or eras continue. Buddhism is an off shoot of Hinduism. There are all multiple groups among Buddhists as they are among Hindus, like Zen Buddhism. Accept that this is the time of Sanathan Dharma, it is also the need of moment, hour, & the next epoch. ❤️❤️❤️❤️Regards to Indian Nationals & Sri Modiji for the resurrection of what was possibly the. greatest civilisation in reported history.
Present Buddhism followers are pure and peaceful but after Gowtam Buddha died his followers or students didn't follow buddhs. To converted most of rhe powerful kings into Buddhism and made the kings to peace. Because of kings became peace then these Muslims entered and conquered us.
Sir,youtube has opened innumerable channels of controversies with billions of people sounding their theories. And in all medias/social media controversies are the champions and rule the roost.
In last 50yrs in Srilanka many Shiva temples were destroyed and reconstructed as Buddhist temples over there..Even after end of civil war in 2009, many shiva temples were demolished and converted into Buddhist temples.
First of all tell me who has the problem with idol worshipping ? Then tell me who destroyed whose temples. Hindhuism one of the core philosiphy is idol worshipping . Why they destroy temples. Vice versa is true . Buddhists destroyed hindhu temple go and see angkorwat temple How they destroyed and added Buddhist idols in that temple
Is that how it is ? A stupa is built to cover a temple is it? The historian in me thought that a stupa was built to preserve relics of the Sakya Muni - Buddha, and that's why they build it so that you can't enter in there. If I apply Jaggi's logic then all the Christian and Muslim coffins also have a Hindu temple inside it then.
If our beloved actor Prakash Rai (Raj) hears this conversation, he will go mad. I wish he should listen to this along with Barkha Dutt and Rajdeep Sardesai.
Both destroyed each other but there are far more Hindu kings that patronised Buddhism than there were Buddhist rulers.. Eg of Buddhists vandalising Hindu temple, look no further Angkor Wat!
Bandhu if some one claim something then one has to produce evidence in form of material or literature for this you has to organise Shastrasth like earlier used to be for betterment of Hindu sects because Buddhism is one of sects like Shaiv, Shakti ,Vaishnav,Brahm, Jain,Sanatan,Ajivak,Sarna,Dony Polo and numerious other sects. Jay Hind
Guruji, ur view regarding stupa is wrong. It's much more than bricks n mud. And ur view regarding murderd is true, the most sacred Buddhist pilgrimage place Buddha Vihar in Bihar (Bodh Gaya) is own by non Buddhist.
Forget the past but look at the present moment. Mahabodhi Vihara at Bodhgaya is classic eg of Hindu control of Buddhist sanctum sanctorum. Why there are 5 Hindu board member and only 4 Buddhist in the management. That too the chairman should always be the Hindu. Hindu temple, Christian church and Muslim mosque are governed by their faithful but only Buddhist holiest temple is under the control of Non Buddhist. 2:25
We have the names Rama and Krishna in our families so frequently. But read out all the names in the ancestors and decendents of Lord Buddha. You wouldn't get a single Rama or Krishna. Check all the names in their families and branches. Why? Because the story of Ramayana and Mahabharat all came very later.
Hold on Buddha said no idols & he is no god ? He never denied Gods, he said do not bother as they are complex. It was Asoka who created religion out of nothing and to assert his dominance, he forcibly converted Temples into Buddhist statues
Sadhguruji is 100% Correct. For example, the Largest Hindu Temple was built in the Historical Past was the Famous: ANGKOR WAT, and that was Before Buddhism and WHICH WAS BUILT FOR THE HINDU GOD CALLED LORD VISHNU in the Ancient Past, and which is still in CAMBODIA, and Later for Whatever reasons became BUDDHIST PLACE OF WORSHIP, and that is the HISTORICAL FACT, because it has been documented. This above video unfortunately does not provide numerous reasons, why many Hindus Temples converted to Buddhist Monasteries,etc. The main and obvious reasons for the disappearance of the Buddhist influence was due to the waves upon waves of the Islamic Jihadi invasions of India and the Sanatan Hindu Cultural Civilisation barely survived and that was due to the resistance of the SANATAN HINDUS. Unfortunately, for the Buddhists, their “Ahimsa” policy and none-violence philosophy could not prevent wanton destruction of Buddhism mainly due to Islamic Jihadi’s rampages and catastrophic destructions of numerous Buddhist institutions(e.g. NALANDA)etc.
What we call Hindu, Buddhists, jain, sikhs weren't very different in past. This distinction has become clear only in last century, mostly because Brits and Indian National Congress lateron wanted to seperate & weaken Hinduism. They also tried to make these Indian social groups fight each other so that foreign religion can have chance to expand its influence.
I can give proof that Sanskrit didn't exist before Buddha. That's why we cant get a single stone with sanskrit lipi in excavations. We get only in Brahmi lipi and Pali language, Tamil language etc.... But no devnagari lipi at all. This absence is a bigger evidence that Hindu mandir and Sanskrit all came very later.
@mohananr Actually, the Muslim population in the Indian subcontinent is 30%. So, the population increases from the initial 5% to 30%. So, the Muslim were not successful in getting hindu women to bear Muslim babies.
No buddhist stupas were destroyed by Hindus and vice versa. This is a ridiculous question to ask. The answer that stupas were originally temples above with stupa was built is equally ridiculous. Where are they getting all these stupid ideas? Both are part of the same tree. Go to old temples you will see shiva, vishnu, buddha, tirthankaras all together. Please visit ancient temples first. See Gajalaxmi, Indra, Brahma in stupas then you will understand.
Bodh dharma spread from india. Hindu know puran and vedh as well mahabharat by vedh vyas also born in nepal like sidhartha gautam. Vedh vyas also has another name but the name are earned and given by people. People may have reused the stone to make a new temple. Pali langauge budhsit scared text spread from coast of india to south east asia. Souther king of india can use their langauge but why pali because that the universal langauge of south asia in both bramin script. Not limited to sanskrit and nepali in north and tamil and karnad in south or so on
@@goodrose4691 they were not fought in the name of expansion, they were fought against injustice and adharma happened against Sita & draupadi .. While these buddhist destroyed our nation in the name of pseudo peace first they converted our Kung which made them weak and open to invaders ...
glad at least one guru speaks his mind
Swaha
What we call Hindu, Buddhists, jain, sikhs weren't very different in past. This distinction has become clear only in last century, mostly because Brits and Indian National Congress lateron wanted to seperate & weaken Hinduism. They also tried to make these Indian social groups fight each other so that foreign religion can have chance to expand its influence.
He made comments for provoking purpose. If he really need to respond he had many regions like Afghhanisthan those destroyed many Buddhist structures. For information thousands of temples in india were destroyed with solid proof. But We want only few of above want to restore.
Hindus never break idols and good sculptures. We respect such artistic abilities.
Ya same as muslims never break idol and sculptures.🤣🤣🤣
@@superr_heroesWhich Hindu break idols?
@@superr_heroesBhai... Brutal mughals broke thousands and thousands of temples....Talibans exploded wonders of Buddhist remain..
Are you kidding me?
Budha born in nepal, vedh vyas born in nepal ( who wrote 18 puran, mahabharat). So when people say hindu break sculpture or budhist did then note pali lamgauge that is budhsit sacred langauge spread even from south indian empire that went to south east asia.sanskrit in top and tamil in bottom but pali is the langauge that is in both bramin script thailand, tibet, srilanka and even afgahnistan. The universal langauge of south asia. King of nepal even told mughal army who came to destroy temple and had surender to nepali army that they can stay in nepal and build majid. That is open mindness of hindu kimgs. Reason why even jagarnath puri has a special respect for a king of far away land.
@@superr_heroesgaint buddha idol I Afghanistan who destroye
My many pranams to Sadguruji. Well said. Thank you.
Excellent way of answering the questions...only Sadguru can answer boldly like this...I respect all his statements
Shame shame shame go back to Indian history😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Sadguru is real Sanathani in every sence of that word.
A pseudoscientist as well 😂
@@minthura9053 he is a liar you saw how he didn't answer and changed topic by saying muslims did this and that
@@andreamessiasgomes7118 listen carefully again bot 🤪
@@andreamessiasgomes7118 exactly 💯
@@rishi2791 are you agreeing with me ?
If a buddhist proves that any temple is built over buddhist monasteries. We will definitely give it back with respect.
Because we respect and worship buddha also.
False
The holiest Buddhist stupa built by Ashoka at Bodhgaya known as Mahabodhi Mahavihara is under the Hindu majority board of directors. 5 Hindus and 4 Buddhist and chairman always Hindu. None of Hindu temple, mosques, church and Gurudwara is governed by another religion except Buddhist. Forget about the past. How long Hindus have campaigned for Ram Mandir at Ayodhya?
@@gyadre What do you mean by `None of Hindu temple`? What do you mean by "except"? All Hindu temples are managed by government-controlled bodies, which often include non-Hindu chairpersons or administrators.
Care to do a little research before making claims. Did u ever consider asking a Hindu about this?
BTW FYI Hindu's places worship's income are just taxed but not of other faith! Hindu’s place of worship income can be used for other purposes but not of other faith!
@@gyadre Please, stop making random claims! We're tired of u guys always bIaming Hindus for everything!
This was all started by Kangrass Govt! Go and ask them! We're victims too, and our situation is even more challenging than urs!
U r all upset with decision taken by our previous secuIar Govt, but u point ur figer on us!
Please make this clear in ur mind that
Please make it clear in your mind that "government is not synonymous with Hinduism" (the government is not equal to Hinduism.)
It's high time that u stop generalizing and stereotyping the Hindus! We're all done with all of this, to be honest.
@@gyadre Christian individuals have been appointed to the TTD board, which manages the renowned Tirupati Balaji Temple and pilgrimage site, serving as an example for u to verify.
Care to verify this!
This is just one of several examples we have.
It is nonsensical to say Hindus destroyed budhist temples. The Angkor Thom Temple was a Temple of Brahma which was vandalised by Buddhists. Angkor Vat was also a hindu temple. Budha is not an avatar of Vishnu. In Bodh Gaya , Vishnu sits on Gayasura. Budhism is only hardly 2500 years old. SANATHAN dharma is thousands of years older than budhism.
Buddha was an incarnation
@@nicholasfejer8451Yes of Lord Hari!!!
Exactly!! I have watched videos of angkorwat, Buddhism is by no means ideal as people think it to be.
What we call Hindu, Buddhists, jain, sikhs weren't very different in past. This distinction has become clear only in last century, mostly because Brits and Indian National Congress lateron wanted to seperate & weaken Hinduism. They also tried to make these Indian social groups fight each other so that foreign religion can have chance to expand its influence.
@@nicholasfejer8451Buddha and Gautam Buddh are two different persons. Gautam Buddha is not considered as a recarnation of Vishnu.
We worship Gautam Buddha as a great teacher of human kind but not as a Recarnation of Vishnu.
Buddha's written pravachan where he talked about "Dharma Sanatan" in Pali and in Sanskrit language.
Jain scriptures states "Dharma Sanatan" just like Ram in Valmiki Ramayan and Krishna in Mahabharat, Bhagvad Geeta, and Shreemad Bhagvata Puranam.
Together we call them "Sanatan Dharma", which the domestic and foreign ideology is trying to distinguish to Divide and Destroy.
What we call Hindu, Buddhists, jain, sikhs weren't very different in past. This distinction has become clear only in last century, mostly because Brits and Indian National Congress lateron wanted to seperate & weaken Hinduism. They also tried to make these Indian social groups fight each other so that foreign religion can have chance to expand its influence.
@@Death__0 you are wrong
Sanatan dharm is mention in Vedas
yes hinduism, sikhism, buddhism, jainism are different are different branches of same tree and have the roots of sanatan dharma
@@ayamsharma1497 no
What we call Hindu, Buddhists, jain, sikhs weren't very different in past. This distinction has become clear only in last century, mostly because Brits and Indian National Congress lateron wanted to seperate & weaken Hinduism. They also tried to make these Indian social groups fight each other so that foreign religion can have chance to expand its influence.
Beautifully presented 👍👍
@@Behappy11231if u believe all are same u are just not being hindu
Whole existence of brilliance of adi shankaraachaary is to defeat nastik buddhist
In debates and bringing back hinduism
You are wrong. Buddhism is completely a different religion, entirely different from all other religions. How? One example I would say here. All other religions including Hindu and Islam believe in the existence of soul, but Buddhism doesn't believe its existence. Lord Buddha denies the existence of soul. So it's not easy to understand Buddhism. So please dont say it was a section of Hinduism. It's the only different religion that says there is no soul at all after death.
Please understand Buddhism properly before you talk about it. It's a religion still under research and very complicated to understand. Buddha denies the existence of soul, but accept reincarnation. He also says one can see his Or hers thousands of reincarnations even when that person is alive. Doesn't it sound very peculiar?
Watching this after the tirupati laddu beef prasada news. Free hindu temples should happen soon. Its now or never. Hindus! Join hands. Take the streets. Lets save our Gods who landed on earth for us to guide and do His seva
God is always with his devotees!
There were incidences especially in the Kashmir Valley, where a lot of scriptures of Shaivism (Kashmir Shaivism) were taken by Buddhists and taken to China. They are said to be taken to protect them from the Islamic invasion, however not all the incidences were that way.
When oldest hindu idol kalp vigrah was obtained to nepal from a buddhsit monk. That was given to america for study ( university of california). Oldesh vidhnu statue in india is also one such that is found to me made in nepal and kashmir. As both these land have khasas from which nepal kaski district is named ( birth place of vedh vyas author of 18 puran and mahabharat and so on).
Awesome Sadhguru
Raja Ram Mohan Roy was a converted Christian and he is the person who replaced Sanskrit with English in schools.
He is buried in UK in Christian style. So don't take his name again without knowing history
Temple can be without God but Temples cannot be without devotees. Well said Sadguruji.
Pranam Sadguru ❤️🙏❤️💪🚩🇮🇳🚩💪
Today ISLAM is NOT wanted any where.. JUSTICE DHARMA is taking shape and effect... EX MUSLIM R HUGE, THIS RELIGION WILL END IN 20 Years ie 2 decades.. AS A HUMAN WE LOVE PEACE. This Religion is kept ALIVE by ISI TURKEY Few Middle East Nation, Nevertheless , We can see Muslim Woman Accepting and Returning Back to SANATAN DHARMA...POWER OF TRUTH AND SANATAN DHARMA 💪🚩🚩🚩💪🙏HARE KRISHNA 🙏💪🇮🇳💪
Thank Sadhguru
Take pleasure in the wounds of others is a very bad idea. Well said Sadguru. Thank you.
Believe in Devine
(Brahma muhurtam) and Wake up in the early morning and become creative and pious. (Santana Dharma).
Buddha says in the Dasarath Jataka about his past life that he was Prince Ramachandra. The deity Vajradhara is similar in concept to Vishnu; the Trikaya doctrine of Buddhism is akin to the Sarguna/Nirguna of Advaita and Sikhism. Even Buddha himself said "eso sanatano dhammo," this teaching of mine is the Sanatana Dharma "discovered by the ancient Brahmins of the past." ALL Dharmics are connected. Islam and its intolerance is the enemy, not our indigenous, tolerant siblings.
All those religions which were born after persecuting and killing others are struggling to survive in this world.we can progress by practicing love, kindness and compassion,not by destroying.
Thank you, I'm starting to admiring Hindu and Buddhis...❤❤
Here is evidence that Hindus destroyed Buddhist viharas: Rupa Gupta and Gautam Gupta, in their book ‘Forgotten Civilizations - The Rediscovery of India's Lost History’ write “Very few people knew that the Keshava deva temple had been built on the site where centuries ago had existed Yasa Vihara, a large Buddhist monastery. It was Sir Alexander Cunningham the pioneer of Indian archaeology who first suggested that Yasa Vihara dated back to the Kushan period. The inscriptions found at the site confirmed that it was in existence even in the days of the Gupta empire. Growse's excavations of ancient mounds in and around Mathura further established Cunningham's theory.”
Do you have any other sources apart from the ones you mentioned?
@@hidden_star14 I am not a historian.
How can u claim that hindus have 'destroyed' the vihara ?? They could have constructed the temple long after the site has been abandoned.
@@osamaAlkaleem Possible. But the same logic is not applied in Babri Masjid and Sambhal.
Let's all fight for our Sanatana Dharma 's existence without any threat to it.
If we don't raise our voice and fight for it we will become slaves in our own beautiful country. Let the Hindus unite always.
Earliest copies available of the Ramayan Mahabharat may be that old but the actual events are much older
When budhism is a part of Hindism, then come they themselves destroy their own temple?
Do you know thee distinction between Astika and Nastika ?
@@minthura9053 dont you know both asthik and nastik comes in Sanaataha Hindu Dharma...
The way buddhist politicians behave against Sanatan Dharam Religion people, it may have been a blessing in disguise Sanatanis destroying buddhist structures
Brother nice video
One thing I learnt is that
Humans are continuously evolving
History continuously has a new change
And anything that is not evolving will remain in history
This question is so silly. Islam MANDATES destroying the Buddha, Shiva, Guru Granth, and all Dharmic gods and gurus. It's a "holy" act of merit. But Hinduism doesn't say destroying the Buddha is virtuous; in fact it's sinful.
Revive Municipal Syrun at 5AM and 5PM in every Town for performing Suryanamaskaram and Sandhyavandanam by every Hindu.
Sadhguru ❤
Sadguru ji love u baba ji salute a 1000 times
At Gaya in the Buddha kovil you can see a Shivalingam near the door
I was present in that meeting he also said not all muslims are bad today
It's simple Hindustan was destroyed by other religions
Nope
@@andreamessiasgomes7118 he is correct
Actually many Bhuddist idols were in areas where muslims are living , like Afghanistan , SE Asia etc , so you can expect what will happen to those Bhuddist sculptures. At Nagarjuna konda in AP we preserved many Bhuddist sculptures.
Not just about history but about Historiography & Civilisational Heritage. Cycles of different epochs or eras continue. Buddhism is an off shoot of Hinduism. There are all multiple groups among Buddhists as they are among Hindus, like Zen Buddhism. Accept that this is the time of Sanathan Dharma, it is also the need of moment, hour, & the next epoch. ❤️❤️❤️❤️Regards to Indian Nationals & Sri Modiji for the resurrection of what was possibly the. greatest civilisation in reported history.
Well said
He didn't answer the destruction of buddhist
Ya you think he has the guts? He is no more spiritual but more of an indocentric person to promote Sanatana dharma worldwide
he literally answered the question
@@tanmaygupta8590 he didn't
His all points indicating eternal truth.
This is what the state of hinduism is now.
The Great guru
Long Live Guru Gi.(Singapore).
Present Buddhism followers are pure and peaceful but after Gowtam Buddha died his followers or students didn't follow buddhs. To converted most of rhe powerful kings into Buddhism and made the kings to peace. Because of kings became peace then these Muslims entered and conquered us.
No the emperor of one of the largest empire was Buddhist and it was a strong empire, the kings you say are just weak.
such BAD days have NOT come to Hinduism to build their temples using stones of Buddista temples.
What about Sri Lanka, a Buddhist country, persecution of Tamils took place since 1980s
Sir,youtube has opened innumerable channels of controversies with billions of people sounding their theories.
And in all medias/social media
controversies are the champions and rule the roost.
Yes they destroyed ego of Hindu ism in india it's afact history show you about pandits pujari in india
Its time to Free Hindu Temples from Govt control
I support sadhguru Ji❤
These facts should be educated to the current generation so that they can understand our history better.
In last 50yrs in Srilanka many Shiva temples were destroyed and reconstructed as Buddhist temples over there..Even after end of civil war in 2009, many shiva temples were demolished and converted into Buddhist temples.
First of all tell me who has the problem with idol worshipping ? Then tell me who destroyed whose temples. Hindhuism one of the core philosiphy is idol worshipping . Why they destroy temples. Vice versa is true . Buddhists destroyed hindhu temple go and see angkorwat temple How they destroyed and added Buddhist idols in that temple
Yes they destroy Buddha temples and Hindu temples in india and even you find out inevery hindu temple if digging out you get Buddha statues it's afact
We Hindus, Jains, Buddist & Sikhs are one.
The word Sanatana has been stolen from Buddhism.
Is that how it is ? A stupa is built to cover a temple is it?
The historian in me thought that a stupa was built to preserve relics of the Sakya Muni - Buddha, and that's why they build it so that you can't enter in there.
If I apply Jaggi's logic then all the Christian and Muslim coffins also have a Hindu temple inside it then.
If our beloved actor Prakash Rai (Raj) hears this conversation, he will go mad. I wish he should listen to this along with Barkha Dutt and Rajdeep Sardesai.
God is within us only
The Sanatana Dharma before Shankaracharya was different, but these evils of the Hindu society would always pull out a propaganda
Yes....no govt shld have rights on hindu temples property 🛕 😢
How about handing over the Mahabodhi temple in Bodh Gaya to Buddhists
Both destroyed each other but there are far more Hindu kings that patronised Buddhism than there were Buddhist rulers..
Eg of Buddhists vandalising Hindu temple, look no further Angkor Wat!
🙏❤️🙏👌
Bandhu if some one claim something then one has to produce evidence in form of material or literature for this you has to organise Shastrasth like earlier used to be for betterment of Hindu sects because Buddhism is one of sects like Shaiv, Shakti ,Vaishnav,Brahm, Jain,Sanatan,Ajivak,Sarna,Dony Polo and numerious other sects. Jay Hind
CAN`T SEE ANY OF THIS ANYWHERE
Guruji, ur view regarding stupa is wrong. It's much more than bricks n mud.
And ur view regarding murderd is true, the most sacred Buddhist pilgrimage place Buddha Vihar in Bihar (Bodh Gaya) is own by non Buddhist.
I can see Mahabharata repeat in this civilization.
Forget the past but look at the present moment.
Mahabodhi Vihara at Bodhgaya is classic eg of Hindu control of Buddhist sanctum sanctorum. Why there are 5 Hindu board member and only 4 Buddhist in the management. That too the chairman should always be the Hindu. Hindu temple, Christian church and Muslim mosque are governed by their faithful but only Buddhist holiest temple is under the control of Non Buddhist. 2:25
Right timing for the Western to come in India now.
Christian God are more rich and handsome.
We have the names Rama and Krishna in our families so frequently. But read out all the names in the ancestors and decendents of Lord Buddha. You wouldn't get a single Rama or Krishna. Check all the names in their families and branches. Why? Because the story of Ramayana and Mahabharat all came very later.
Hindu, sikh, Jain, bhudist plz unity .
Hold on Buddha said no idols & he is no god ? He never denied Gods, he said do not bother as they are complex. It was Asoka who created religion out of nothing and to assert his dominance, he forcibly converted Temples into Buddhist statues
3.05 💯✅️✅️✅️
Which structures did hindus destroyed
Sadhguruji is 100% Correct. For example, the Largest Hindu Temple was built in the Historical Past was the Famous: ANGKOR WAT, and that was Before Buddhism and WHICH WAS BUILT FOR THE HINDU GOD CALLED LORD VISHNU in the Ancient Past, and which is still in CAMBODIA, and Later for Whatever reasons became BUDDHIST PLACE OF WORSHIP, and that is the HISTORICAL FACT, because it has been documented. This above video unfortunately does not provide numerous reasons, why many Hindus Temples converted to Buddhist Monasteries,etc. The main and obvious reasons for the disappearance of the Buddhist influence was due to the waves upon waves of the Islamic Jihadi invasions of India and the Sanatan Hindu Cultural Civilisation barely survived and that was due to the resistance of the SANATAN HINDUS. Unfortunately, for the Buddhists, their “Ahimsa” policy and none-violence philosophy could not prevent wanton destruction of Buddhism mainly due to Islamic Jihadi’s rampages and catastrophic destructions of numerous Buddhist institutions(e.g. NALANDA)etc.
What about the south indian state, everyone wants to establish their own religion, we are sanatan dharm let them decide about their own intentions
yes they will decide and ur future generations will wear ulta topi ... if we don't care enough for sanatana dharma
What we call Hindu, Buddhists, jain, sikhs weren't very different in past. This distinction has become clear only in last century, mostly because Brits and Indian National Congress lateron wanted to seperate & weaken Hinduism. They also tried to make these Indian social groups fight each other so that foreign religion can have chance to expand its influence.
Bahratham is from god SIVA.
He is asking about Bahamian statue at afganistan
The map used shows pojk and aksai chin as NOT parts of India.
Very good
Super super super
Does caste system existed in the South before the coming ofBrahmins in the South
“The Buddha was every inch a Hindu -“ Dr. Koenraad Elst
Was but not anymore
I can give proof that Sanskrit didn't exist before Buddha. That's why we cant get a single stone with sanskrit lipi in excavations. We get only in Brahmi lipi and Pali language, Tamil language etc.... But no devnagari lipi at all. This absence is a bigger evidence that Hindu mandir and Sanskrit all came very later.
Shad guru come to nepal i will show you buddha temple destryed by hindu and change buddha vihar in nepal come
They are in small numbers.. vihar means monks resting place..if hindu kings destroyed Buddhist temples means it's also wrong..
Who Destroyed the Buddha's Statues in Afghanistan........
The thumbnail is a bit provocative. 😮
Sadguru is wrong. In 1200 AD, the Muslim population of India was 5%, and now it is 15%. There was not much change.
Actually 20% growth....10% cannot be counted 😂
Actually 20% growth....10% cannot be counted 😂
@mohananr Actually, the Muslim population in the Indian subcontinent is 30%. So, the population increases from the initial 5% to 30%. So, the Muslim were not successful in getting hindu women to bear Muslim babies.
@@everythingandmore5537 means they produced muslims children only in Muslim woman who have converted from Hindu... right 🤔
Hindu destroyed Tamil history cultural Temple god Siva murugan karuthinan perumal ganapathi all Tamil god no Hindu god
No buddhist stupas were destroyed by Hindus and vice versa. This is a ridiculous question to ask. The answer that stupas were originally temples above with stupa was built is equally ridiculous. Where are they getting all these stupid ideas? Both are part of the same tree. Go to old temples you will see shiva, vishnu, buddha, tirthankaras all together. Please visit ancient temples first. See Gajalaxmi, Indra, Brahma in stupas then you will understand.
Bodh dharma spread from india. Hindu know puran and vedh as well mahabharat by vedh vyas also born in nepal like sidhartha gautam. Vedh vyas also has another name but the name are earned and given by people. People may have reused the stone to make a new temple. Pali langauge budhsit scared text spread from coast of india to south east asia. Souther king of india can use their langauge but why pali because that the universal langauge of south asia in both bramin script. Not limited to sanskrit and nepali in north and tamil and karnad in south or so on
There are many incidents like that in Kerala, Buddhist temple converted. One example is SABARIMALA. Go do some research.
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Jaya Gurudev!
Why did you mention Raja Ram Mohun Roy? He is the reason for the anti Hindu commujist mindset of modern bengalis.???
It was a false allegation.
During Ashoka all over India (akhand Bharat)
there were every corner THERE WAS BUDDHA.
Till 700 ad there was Buddha.
Buddhists were defeated by Adi Shankaracharya through philosophical debates, Adi Shankaracharya was the reason Buddhism didn't overtake the land.
Ashoka was a Buddhist tyrant who waged war in the name of expansion
@@timbaktuu9845and what mahabahar teach about war what ram have done war so don't even tak about asohka
@@goodrose4691 they were not fought in the name of expansion, they were fought against injustice and adharma happened against Sita & draupadi ..
While these buddhist destroyed our nation in the name of pseudo peace first they converted our Kung which made them weak and open to invaders ...
There were 85 K Buddhist viharas and stupas 90% were u nauthorisey occufied by brahmins. Sadguru wants evidence for that is very funny
Then show the source of evidence
interruptive bgm
Sadguru what is your punishment to destroyers of Sanatana Dharma in India especially adulteration of Hindu Prasadam TTD Laddu.
Give them the laddu
Sanatana dharma and Hinduism is not the same
They are same. The religion that follow Sanatana Dharma is Hinduism
They are same. The religion that follow Sanatana Dharma is Hinduism