Labrynth Master Rank | Ranked Gameplay | Yu-Gi-Oh! Master Duel Season 37

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 24 янв 2025

Комментарии • 31

  • @awakemymetis
    @awakemymetis 16 дней назад +1

    Congratulations for the Master rank! 👏
    Those replays are very useful to try to improve with the deck.

  • @cacak58
    @cacak58 13 дней назад

    Love your content, thx for sharing the deck list ❤

  • @2girls1sgs
    @2girls1sgs 16 дней назад +11

    that thumbnail got me actin up 😫

  • @douglasjohnson6293
    @douglasjohnson6293 3 дня назад

    😂😂 awesome

  • @maxicruz246
    @maxicruz246 16 дней назад

    Increíble vídeo del mejor Labrynth player.

  • @shaungomez9898
    @shaungomez9898 16 дней назад +1

    I am playing a Yubel Lab deck now and it is decent, just need some more practice on the Yubel part as well as pulling off more unchained combos!

  • @SunilSingh-xw2hg
    @SunilSingh-xw2hg 16 дней назад +1

    Happy new year brother 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

  • @AnthonyBrown-jp6zn
    @AnthonyBrown-jp6zn 16 дней назад +1

    I'm interested in seeing your master 1 list. It's been a struggle this season

  • @prevhalramsaran4714
    @prevhalramsaran4714 5 дней назад

    Can i use extra deck monsters i see fit, crafting UR is difficult but i can get rhe main deck exact like yours

  • @quirrelleenah2025
    @quirrelleenah2025 16 дней назад +3

    Is there any way to beat Traptrix or Spright with math lab? I always have trouble with low monster level decks

    • @aLousyBum83
      @aLousyBum83 16 дней назад +1

      Basically by beating over their cards with regular lab plays, and utilizing daruma cannon while you have a flippable monster on field.

    • @awakemymetis
      @awakemymetis 16 дней назад

      Equation Cannons are very bad against decks that only play low level/rank monsters.
      I think the general idea would be: If the opponent uses monsters of level/rank 5 or higher, it is worth trying to resolve Equation Cannons. If instead he only uses level/rank 4 or lower monsters, it would be better to look to stop him with cards like Karma Cannon or D-Barrier.

    • @ferdyoktav
      @ferdyoktav 16 дней назад

      Traptrix just Daruma it,because they are Unaffected by Traps then Daruma will sweep them all

  • @A拼命三狼
    @A拼命三狼 16 дней назад +1

    封面很漂亮🎉🎉🎉

  • @Cong_an_kia
    @Cong_an_kia 16 дней назад

    ❤️

  • @tanmaydasadhikari193
    @tanmaydasadhikari193 16 дней назад

    How many times have you made mistakes in calculations?😁

  • @kevin-tr5yg
    @kevin-tr5yg 16 дней назад

    Do you already have rune recipes with the Fuwalos?

  • @edgyplays7529
    @edgyplays7529 13 дней назад +1

    What's the sauce for the thumbnail asking for a friend 💀

  • @datboisean9762
    @datboisean9762 16 дней назад

    Is playing 1 torbie and 1 Chand better than playing both at 2? Wanna make space for more traps so I'm wondering

  • @dungluong7509
    @dungluong7509 16 дней назад

    how can i active trap at draw phase ? i cant find it in setting, i play on pc

    • @kurobii3652
      @kurobii3652 15 дней назад +2

      Setting->game setting-> self chain on, activation confirmation custom->Show switch button on (make sure it's displayed at ON in bottom right corner, beside move hiatory), and make the rest as "confirm activation"

    • @dungluong7509
      @dungluong7509 15 дней назад

      @@kurobii3652 nice !

  • @hatsukikimino1677
    @hatsukikimino1677 16 дней назад

    Im still cannot understand that cannon TwT

    • @saitomitsurugi18
      @saitomitsurugi18 16 дней назад +1

      Count the number of cards on the field and both players hands. Then subtract that from the monsters level. That is the rank.
      Then take the rank number minus the target monsters level.
      For example if the total amount of cards is 14 and your opponent has a level 8 monster. 14-8=6. That means two rank 6 XYZ monsters.
      Now take that rank and subtract from the target monster level. So 8-6= 2. Which means a level 2 fusion.
      That is because 6+2=8 (Target level)
      6+6+2=14 (Cards on field and hand between both players)
      You ofc have to take into account if a card is chained. Such as Lady as that will change the total count. So if I add a card and it's 15 then it'd be rank 7. (15-8=7) So it won't resolve.
      However, if they have TWO monsters then you can select which target. So let's say they have a level 10 along with an 8. Then you can adjust it.
      So lets look at that previous example, If a level 10 is present then it'd be rank 5 (15-10=5) and then 10-5=5. So two rank 5 XYZ and one level 5 fusion.
      Tl;Dr: Count cards between both players. Select a monster level. Preferably 5 on up. The higher the better. Then take the rank number minus their level. You'll resolve it and banish their field.
      PS: This works with Transaction Roleback in case you miss.

    • @Whusker
      @Whusker 16 дней назад +1

      Total number of cards = T
      Enemy monster = M
      XYZ = X
      Fusion = F
      T = 2X + F
      M = X + F
      Example:
      Total cards in play 12 (field and hand, no GY nor banishment)
      Enemy monster rank 8
      XYZ rank 4 ( two of them)
      Fusion rank 4
      XYZ and Fusion ranks added give you 4+4= enemy monster 8, while ALL your extra deck cards you picked give you the 12 cards are in play ( from the other XYZ card plus your fusion 4+4+4).

    • @dwan270
      @dwan270 16 дней назад +1

      Just count the total card in you and your opponent hand and field, then banish from side deck 2 xyz monster with same level and 1 fusion (the total of banished xyz and fusion is always equal to total card you count on the first time. But one thing you must remember, one xyz and one fusion you banished, their sum of level must be equal to enemy monster's level (face-up) you choose
      I've tried explaining it in "stupid" terms, without any "complicated" formula. There's no way that you still confused 😂

    • @nicoleng5074
      @nicoleng5074 15 дней назад

      Try searching for mathematician approach for this math cannon highly detailed with a special matrix sheet i learn my sec from there

    • @prevhalramsaran4714
      @prevhalramsaran4714 5 дней назад

      ​@@saitomitsurugi18You explained nothing Bro

  • @Tienrach
    @Tienrach 16 дней назад

    Hiii