David Wallace-Wells Describes Scale of Climate Crisis to Senators
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 6 сен 2024
- ‘Globally, 8.7 million annual deaths have been attributed to fossil fuel pollution. That is death at the scale of the Holocaust every single year’ - Journalist David Wallace-Wells spoke to U.S. senators about the climate crisis.
» Subscribe to NowThis Earth: go.nowth.is/Ea...
» Sign up for our newsletter KnowThis to get the biggest stories of the day delivered straight to your inbox: go.nowth.is/Kn...
For more climate crisis news, stories on environmental issues, and world news, subscribe to NowThis Earth.
#ClimateChange #Pollution #Earth #Environment #Science #NowThis
Connect with NowThis
» Subscribe to NowThis News: go.nowth.is/New...
» Like us on Facebook: go.nowth.is/New...
» Tweet us on Twitter: go.nowth.is/New...
» Follow us on Instagram: go.nowth.is/New...
» Find us on Snapchat Discover: go.nowth.is/New...
NowThis Earth is daily news coverage of climate, sustainability, biodiversity, species extinction, environmental justice, and other planetary concerns.
NowThis is your premier news outlet providing you with all the videos you need to stay up to date on all the latest in trending news. From entertainment to politics, to viral videos and breaking news stories, we’re delivering all you need to know straight to your social feeds. We live where you live.
/ nowthisearth
@NowThisEarth
![ARGENTINA vs. CHILE [3-0] | RESUMEN | ELIMINATORIAS SUDAMERICANAS | FECHA 7](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/De3AWmXzhuA/mqdefault.jpg)
And they still don't comprehend it.
Oh, they do. Just a large majority choose to comprehend money and the lobbyists saying they withdrawal their support-aka money- which could cost them votes.
this isnt about comprehension darlin
They think they will be the ones on the lifeboat. Like the billionaires buying land in New Zealand (which has been stopped by the New Zealand government).
during lockdown, the air quality in my city became so much better, but i only noticed when it was lifted and all those cars hit the street again. such a difference, and i didn't even notice before! i absolutely agree with him. powerful speech!
The solution are not lockdowns tho
@@viktor2915 this is an irrelevant comment. We as a people on earth just need to change our fossil fuels emissions.
That's David Wallace-Wells, author of The Uninhabitable Earth. You owe it to yourself and more, to your children, to read this book.
OF COURSE!
For comedy maybe, its as much fantasy in his words as the Harry Potter series
@@Redrocket120 when its not flawed, sure, and the ice core data that contradicts much of this stuff is also science
A lot of bs you can almost smell it.
@@Redrocket120 this guy is a journalist who’s trying to sell a book..... science is not the church...... if you’re unable to debate science then just call it the bible.
Good to finally see people openly discussing the truth of it.
If it were not for global warming humanity would freeze to death in the next ice age.
@@chasthanhburns123 Just like our species did in the last ice age? Moron.
@@chasthanhburns123 we wont make it till then dude.
It's sad that for many to see the benefit of reducing our polluting ways, it has to be put in terms of money lost, not nature lost, not loss of life, purely financial loss.
If it were not for global warming humanity would freeze to death in the next ice age.
Sadly thats the only way u can affect governments, by giving them Financial loss.
So true!
CO2 at 0.04% is a 2,500th part of the atmosphere. That means to warm the climate by just 1"C carbon dioxide molecules must capture 2,500"C of heat energy. That is impossible. It also breaks the fundamental laws of thermodynamics.
Methane at 0.00017% is a 600,000th of the atmosphere so it's even more impossible.
However, the climate is changing. This is because of deliberate geoengineering programmes, in particular ozone thinning away from the poles. Though largely unreported ozone thinning effect is directly observable, this summer you can see a unnaturally bright sun just as we did last year. Under these conditions the pain felt when looking at the sun is not only from the increase in visible light but the much larger increase in infrared. (Look up at the sky and you will see a range of geoengineering operations in progress, these include chemtrail induced cloud or hazing, ripple patterns caused by HAARP installations, bizarre and unnatural cloud formations).
Climate change is a programme to force change in accordance with the implementation of Agenda 21 /2030. Current events demonstrate this transition is well underway and will involve massive population cull through injected nanotech (re transhumanist programme). Agenda 21 also sees the permanent loss of all property rights with the introduction of universal basic income (ref NESARA/GESARA) and has/is being promoted by The World Economic Forum.
'You will own nothing and you will be happy' WEF
In a depopulated world the surviving brainwashed and controlled population will be confined to mega cities. Carbon limits will be used to restrict consumption and liberty. Meanwhile the re-greened wilderness will be the exclusive playground of the ultra rich elite posing as conservationists.
The CO2 hoax amounts to the theft of the world and the enslavement of humanity by a parasitic few.
Welcome to the future!
_________
I have included a debunking of 'accumulated heat' as it is so often used to explain how trace elements, so called 'greenhouse gasses', can warm the planet.
Accumulated heat whilst sounding a reasonable explanation of how heat can build up is rather nothing more than gobbledygook. In fact it shows those using such arguments do not even understand what heat is.
When we measure temperature we are measuring the heat energy a thing is losing. In short heat is a measurement of flow, the transfer of heat energy and this will always be in the direction towards the colder. For this reason a thing can never 'accumulate heat' in the way those advocating CO2 climate change describe. The temperature of a body is the measure of heat output, it can never be greater than the measure of heat input. Output = input. When a thing is warmed it is heated to an equivalent of the heat input. If this input is not maintained it will cool. Those that propose that heat can build up to be hotter than the total measure of heat input at a given time either do not understand what heat is or are being deliberately misleading. To illustrate, an object being heated by a flame can never become hotter than that flame, it's temperature cannot rise inexorably to the temperature of the sun for instance. Heat cannot be accumulated. When we think about it common sense tells us this must be the case.
NASA and even Nobel Prize winning physicists have expounded 'accumulated heat' as the explanation how CO2 is able to warm the atmosphere. They claim that over hundreds of years CO2 has captured heat energy and this heat has 'accumulated' to produce a serious warming effect. As I have just explained, this is totally impossible and fundamentally violates all the laws of thermodynamics. That respected scientists should support such uneducated, unthinking nonsense is disturbing and only reflects that in terms of being able to think clearly about a subject they have no facility or inclination. These are the Dark Ages of science. Belief has outweighed logic or any critical thought. It tells us that we should not unquestioningly accept anything we are told, that experts can be fools.
(NB: be aware of attempts to discard thermodynamics by talking about biology.
Eg. 'It only takes a drop of arsenic to kill a person.'
This would be somewhat desperate, muddled thinking. Clearly biological processes based on the reaction of a cell are not the same as the laws of physics/thermodynamics).
(AS PROOF THIS DECEPTION IS REAL, DISSENTING INFORMATION SUCH AS THIS IS BEING BLOCKED. THIS COMMENT WILL BE BLOCKED, BURIED, OR DELETED WITHIN HOURS. PLEASE COPY).
@@chasthanhburns123 Nope, we have good insulation.
I was in lockdown in Angeles City Philippines. Within a week I noticed an enormous difference. For the first time I could see the Zambalas Mtn range clear as day and the air was easy to breathe.
Why doesn't your city build Electric propelled fast trains and light rail?
@@thetechnicanwithaheart1682 That is coming! The Philippines will probably have a bullet train from Manila to Angeles/Clark before the US has one anywhere.
I agree
This is just....extraordinarily incredible to hear put forth so succinctly and sensibly. It’s up to US!
Agreed. Love David Wallace wells.. I talk about climate change of my channel all the time.
"2/3 of all carbon emissions since the beginning of the industrial revolution have been emitted in the last 38 years."
David Wallace - Wells.
Adverse carbon emissions effects contributing to the abrupt irreversible climate change catastrophe now ongoing and accelerating exponentially have a 40 year lag period, meaning that the climate of the earth is just now beginning to feel the effects of the carbon dioxide emissions emitted in 1982.
We have not even begun to feel the effects of any portion of any of the carbon emissions contributing to the ongoing catastrophic abrupt irreversible climate change since David Wallace - Wells was born.
Time is short,
Get yourselves right.
God be with you all.
4.4K this Should be on the front page why am I learning about this a week later wtf
If it were not for global warming humanity would freeze to death in the next ice age.
@@chasthanhburns123 If it weren't for big companies profiting of us. It would have taken hundreds of years to reach the limits we are at now.
@@rickygonzalez2356 If it were not for global warming humanity would freeze to death in the next ice age.
3 foot of rain in Northern Italy, broke the day record for precipitation in Europe, but even here in Europe, wasn't on the news outside
David is pretty famous for writing his book uninhabitable Earth!
Eloquent expression not fear based just real pointing to the need for Action Globally, in this Nation and beginning in every Household !!! We are All capable of bringing forth action to support these needed changes..🌎
Now if money actually grew on trees they might get on board. A new cleaner greed is what they need.
🏆 you won with this comment
Earlier this year, a neighbor asked if something was on fire. There was suddenly the smell of smoke. Turns out it was from the California fires. I’m in NY, not far from VT or Montreal.
Thank you very much.
Polution and climate have very little to do with one another. I agree that polution is a major killer. His figures are spot on and we'll documented, but it has nothing to do with CO2. Rather with smoke particulates, toxins and NOX gasses. He makes a brilliant point and then also demonstrates what is wrong with the whole narrative. The focus is taken away from polution, which we can do something about right now and redirected to anthropogenic warming. By the way, burning if wood can be equally harmfull
its the same ffuel.
@@denisdaly1708 I am sorry but you are missing the point. Pollution has nothing to do with climate change. You cannot bundle the two together. When you do, you remove solutions of the table. Let's say that we stop using fossil fuels today and only burn plant material, the CO2 balance will not be affected and atmospheric CO2 will stabilize. Of course this is a theoretical scenario where we can replace the plant material at the same rate as usage. The point being, we eliminated CO2 concentration rise. However, the pollution will remain and the deaths from pollution will remain. Pollution can be addressed through technology, choices and legislation right now. For instance. Rather use a petrol engine over a diesel engine. More CO2, but no particulates or NOX gases. By trying to limit CO2, we make other compromises that are much worse for humanity in the short term. I am all for sustainable energy, but from a pollution perspective, we are focusing on the wrong stuff
I believe the information, however, why weren’t sources and scientific studies better cited and quoted?
Because it muddies the conversation if its meant to be publicly broadcasted
Basically at that point you leave the sources until someone asks for them
It's a way to get folks who otherwise would tune out to stick around for hopefully a little longer so they can hear more facts so folks understand it better as a whole
To add to ArgentumEmperio’s response which is completely accurate- many times there are time limits for the speaker.
He is presenting for senators in a way that’s snappy and easy to digest, he includes more sources in his article “The Uninhabitable Earth” and the book he wrote of the same name.
❤️❤️❤️
Thank you
That’s pretty powerful stuff
If it were not for global warming humanity would freeze to death in the next ice age.
Too bad it's a bunch of B.S.
Looking for 50 years now...still no problemo, just more hysteria...."models say"....
Not one right yet.
It is pretty fairy tales stuff
@@Pietje_Piraat just like religion right?
eliminate ff subsidies. a good first step
It's funny, each time I watch an old video on climate change talking about floods and fires and extreme weather... More has happened since the time of the video. It's got to watching 3 month old videos and in the space between then and now there's been wildfires and mass flooding since. It's gonna get to the point where you watch a week old video and since then there's been 5 catastrophic weather events.
Nearly 3 foot of rain fell within one day earlier this week, in Ligurian coast, near Genoa North Italy, this week. European media hardly noticed, it's rapidly becoming run of the mill. Another flood, oh well..
We have no control
Thank you for an excellent presentation ! Pitty you couldn't call the audience what they actually are - idiots .
Says the person who spells pity with two t’s 🙄
@@paldri she is likely from Denmark and speaks Danish as her primary language. Din hundehoved.
Your comment should have mentioned that she does not need to worry about CACC, the whole thing is a gross exaggeration and some would say hoax. The problem is you have get in to the nitty gritty of the IPCC science to understand that the summary reports that supposedly summarize the science are political instruments that bear no resemblance to the original work. There is little proof that there are tipping points and that there’s any emergency. If there were, the earth would have burned up by now as CO2 has been far higher in the past. The truth is we’re being led by a globalist, multicultural and elitist cabal to believe these exaggerations in order to line their pockets. And blaming FF suppliers for particulate pollution from wildfires is crazy. Wild fires are due to humans building in forests which brings human caused fire starting issues (fires, cigarettes, glass, power lines etc), and poor forest management… the IPCC actually state that there’s no correlation between forest fires and CC. The models predicted higher temps and lower moisture in the forest floor, turns out that this is not correct. Anyway, proeve og slap af, tag det roligt, det er like saa slemt som du tror.
@@chriskshaw7601 All correct. But you cant’t change the minds of any of these folks. Even if you could travel 100yrs into the future and bring back cold hard evidence to show them, they still would not believe you. They could also just search for Steve Koonin on youtube and watch some of his material. But they won’t do that. They love the fear & panic. It’s as if it’s a lifestyle for them 🤷🏽♂️
@@paldri thanks for the reply. Yes, there’s a lot of education needed. The Europeans and Nordic countries have been fed this watermelon nonsense for years and turning this multi million ton supertanker around is not going to be easy.
@@paldri yeah just keep on drinking the Kool-aid and wishing it away. Worse than ever droughts, fires (yes, connected to global heating), unprecedented atmospheric rivers (last year in BC) costing untold billions and impacting lives horrifically. Forcing millions to leave their homes mostly in already-poor places of the world you think are far far away from your comfortable tidy lives. But it's fine, you and chrisk shaw keep denying your lives away and pretend there's no such thing as climate heating... reality will smack you awake from your little fictional dreams one day very soon. :)
So many people think it’s not real
Pollution is totally different from carbon dioxide.
But the pollution comes from the vehicular and industrial(mostly) emissions which are based on fossil fuel resources.
So incentivizing fossil fuels will increase pollution & pollution related healt issues
@@fahadbinislam2344 If it were not for global warming humanity would freeze to death in the next ice age.
@@chasthanhburns123
If (assuming) thats the case then how much warming you think we should reach?what it the "Necessary warming" you think/suggest?
Co2 is what plants like... so it can never be a pollutant
This so important but most aren’t watching or paying attention
Good Talk. Not gonna work. It's time up for Humanity.
Senators:"zzzzzzzz"
He would be more persuasive if he listed the specific ways that people die which are attributed to pollution. Otherwise its too easy to think of it as abstract
Great talk, except current model estimates are not including:
1) Aerosol effect that will happen after phasing out fossil fuels. This alone adds 0,2-1,0C more warming and on average that's 0,6C topping current levels.
2) Tipping points. Some of these have already started: 2.1) Amazon rainforest is not longer a carbon sink, but an emitter (2 current studies). 2.2) Arctic sea ice have likely reduced to point of no return. Arctic sea has already warmed and lost 90% of sea ice volume. 2.3) Permafrost is thawing fast and releases GHG's. 2.4) Arctic seabed is warming and releasing methane to the atmosphere (shallow waters, like ESAS area). 2.5) Greenland is melting and is near lowering enough so any further heating is added with lower elevations. 2.6) Western Antarctica is melting and near or over tipping point. 2.7) Mankind emissions have NOT reduced and even Covid reduction levels have just reduced emissions amount that has to be reduced every year. 2.8) Mountain glaciers in most of the globe are reduced and this will lead to water shortages and extreme weather events like flash floods. 2.9) Western USA is going through megadrought that could start desertification of the area.
Adding even few of already started tipping points to current models and their predictions are pretty much useless. At low point we could add 1,0C heating, but on higher end 16,0C could also happen. Our current estimates should at least include the lower number, just because changes has STARTED.
And these points are not single events, but in many cases can enhance each others.
Most likely 3,5C is unavoidable, but any further emission makes heating and loss of planetary life (including us) even more devastating.
Thanks for the info, supplementing Wallace-Wells' necessarily brief and concise speech to the Senators. Unfortunately the denialism is very strong among the commenters here. Stay strong though.
When billionaires sit there and see there is technology that will allow them to leave this wretched planet. The no f's given aspect kicks in.
Where will they go? Dead, low-gravity moon? Lifeless, barren Mars?
@@biomutarist6832 no the planets are on the edge of the Andromeda Galaxy.
@@makerhappy6718 I'll read that as sarcasm, but my point is that Earth is the only place we know that can sustain life as we know it. This "wretched" planet is the only one we have, at least for the next few millennia or so.
@@biomutarist6832 definitely not sarcasm you simple-minded human.
@@makerhappy6718 ok, what's there at the edge of the Andromeda Galaxy? Proven habitable planets?
looks like he is speaking in a pretty much empty room
Enjoyed the book.
It's too late, though.
Him saying “uncertainty” so often gives fuel to skeptics
Maybe it's already too late. 'We' got high on the hog and the planet is responding much like a body would fighting off an 'infection'.... by raising its temperature.
Let the jellyfish take over, humanity had its shot.
Guy McPherson could be right, after all. Wells took much of his information from him.
But hey, who needs a viable biosphere after all?
'returns to playing Fallout 4, rewatches Mad Max: Fury Road'
Is anything really going to change all that much? I ask because people are so good at neutralizing or ignoring this kind of information.
Anyone still so greedy- they begin to have massive impact on my kids and theirs and on. You hurt my kids, we have a problem. Not one senator or congressman can say how many zeros in a billion? We need to spend whatever it takes plus $1 to restart economy. As he repeats it won’t change the company other than their carbon footprint. It’s 2nd grade easy so why aren’t they? Saw some many many countries agreed to tax polluters
Bjorn Lomberg be pulling his hair listening to this.
The earth seeks equilibrium, or homeostasis.
The human race has altered the time line of the earth. Climate change is inevitable, All we can do now is prepare and adapt.
Very wise words
Vote! That’s the most important thing you can do! Vote for politicians who are not payed by the fossil fuel industry.
What a load of bollocks
This entire speech is factually wrong
Just like you.
Glad to see others also see through the lies of this "journalist", trying to sell his books on fear. Wonder how many trees got whacked for the paper his books are printed on.
*sparks up blunt to cope*
I sold my car and now I ride a bike. Everyone should do the same.
I thank you.
I have 6 bicycles I never use and drive a v8 truck with no exhaust. Everybody should do the same.
@@chasthanhburns123
Your 6 bicycles are like your brain,Never used.
@@chasthanhburns123 - Good for you. Have a great weekend!
wow, you can afford to live close to your job. congratulations.
Do it before it’s too late
If it were not for global warming humanity would freeze to death in the next ice age.
He's appealing about 350,000 lives against fossil fuel pollution.
Coal and fossil fuel companies be like: We wouldn't bat an eye for ten times that. What are you on about?
We're too selfish, maybe a miracle will save us? Truly intelligent lifeforms don't count on miracles. ⚘
I am organizing a climate rally.
🙄
We need to change A.S.A.P
Not really, the sooner we die off the sooner the world can recover. See the thing is we are not killing earth, the planet will be fine. But we wont, and I dont care. I hope the human race gets wiped out. Yes myself included, all humans.
No, we do not. There is no problem. It is just fantasy
@@dbrown2430 better start with yourself ASAP then. No one needs these kind of depressing nihilistic comments anyway.
I LOVE YOU SO MUCH I MISS YOU MY BRILLIANT The next einstein
This is a superb speech, except for the fact of not addressing the elephant in the room - animal agriculture. Without exposure, we can't reach the desired level of public awareness. Climate change is way more than fossil fuel pollution.
Very good point, corporate animal agribusiness is a catastrophic source of methane and other greenhouse gases. Thanks for making it. Can't remember if it's in the Uninhabitable Earth book, but if it's not it should be.
I am all for reducing pollution, that's pollution from all sources. Chemical waste, sewage waste, plastics, run off from farmers fields, plain old household waste. Fossil fuels account for much air pollution from motor traffic, shipping and air traffic.
When it comes to forest fires and so on I think he needs to look at the figures from the past and he will see that the US figures for wild fires are at a fraction of what they used to be. The data and figures are readily available and not hard to find.
The air in the UK is far and away cleaner than it was 70 years ago. That is despite the massive increase in motor traffic.
I have a feeling this is simply more scare mongering of the kind we have been fed over the past decades. ALL past predictions by 'world class' scientists have proved incorrect so far. The latest gloomsters predictions will be no more successful either.
The figures quoted for deaths caused by air pollution are just little more than a guess based on the worst possible case assumptions, emotional statements like 'Holocaust scale' levels
of deaths simply flag this up as bogus.
No one can say with any certainty what figures are in the real world.
Over the top reports like this paint such a black, hopeless picture of the future do precicely the opposite to what they say they want. People see all these doom laden predictions and simply turn off.
The climate has always changed and always will. Does man have an effect? Of course. Is the globe warming at an alarming rate? No. Are sea levels rising ? Yes. But they have been for 20000 years. The past century at a rate of 2mm / year give or take a bit. As it was in the century before. Check the figures.
Follow the money.
Historically CO2 levels are not far above the lowest levels ever. I think 280ppm in the 1800's was the low point. The fact we are at 400+ ppm is no problem. Plants, trees, crops all need CO2 to thrive.
Cut fossil fuel use as much as possible that's fine but don't expect 'green' sources to come to the rescue.
Nuclear power might do it of course but if that is the plan then we had better get busy.
wow you've been drinking some strong kool-aid. 400 + ppm is a huge problem and it's going to get worse for sustaining the lives of humans and other creatures on this planet. It's not "bogus" and not "doom-laden". David W-W is one of the few who have distilled the info, backed it up with solid evidence and tell it like it is, but still get labeled as fear-mongers by those like yourself who want the status quo to continue. Most of them/you don't want their comfortable lives disrupted or their profit margins threatened. Read the book like I did and you'll see how he provides the details AND EVIDENCE that he couldn't in this short summary testimony before the Senators. It's fine if you don't "believe" scientists and journalists like Wallace-Wells who understand and interpret science for lay folks ... but don't claim you are a scientist or even a journalist. You have shown zero evidence for your claim that global heating is not rising at an alarming rate. Publish an evidence-based book like Wallace-Wells has and then you come to this discussion with some of credibility. Meanwhile your claims and easy putdowns mean zilch compared to Mr. Wallace-Wells.
Show me on the coroners report where it says cause of death “climate change by fossil fuel”. On the same hand when was the last time you were diagnosed with a case climate change and were able to stay home? Was it contagious?
It not like that.
The pollutant particle in your lung can cause severe health issues over time.
Massive floods, Hurricanes,Wildfires, Heatwaves,Tsunamis,Rain deficit leading to low crop yeild,Rising sea level leading to loss of habitat and agricultural land.....
these all affect the modern human life in a bad way,which leads to deaths.
So the doctors report might say that cause of death 'drowning', but the reason he drowned is for a hurricane /tsunami that swept him away.
Hahaha great post Luis
@@fahadbinislam2344 so, how can this journalist clown come up with that number of deaths? Itsjust fantasy to make people scared of a fake problem
@@fahadbinislam2344 Excellent response. Hopefully in the future doctors will start including it in their diagnosis and coroners in causes of death... seriously it should be happening soon.
*Stand Up 2 Climate Crisis!*
This dude is hard to listen to.
tell him to start riding his bicycle everywhere and turn off the central heat and air at his house....
No substantiation is given. This guy is a journalist reading dramatically. I could stand up there and read like that about deaths caused by junk food. Climate change science is a half step away from astronomy as it is, and the amount of exaggeration about the western US fires is laughable (take a look at acreage burned in the 1800s and even the 1930s).
You mean Astrology?
Or you don't know their different?
@@fahadbinislam2344 nice catch. I wrote the comment in the middle of the night, I meant Astrology
Climate change is real,
the science may not be as accurate as others,but true
@@fahadbinislam2344 the climate has been changing since the earth's 1st day, but this testimony is a non sequiter. Where is he getting his death numbers? Wildfire acreage burned is 1/6th of the average 1880-1930, its been minimized. They have not proven a link between CO2 and any climate change - ice core data contradicts his claims (higher CO2 levels during cold times in the past, and its been warmer in the past than it is now, sometimes with lower CO2). The reasoning is specious and his testimony is patently false with non-sequiter, scare mongering phrases.
@@kpk33x ya, it sure looked like u lustened to it in ur sleep. per IPcc its much worse.
What does "attributed" mean ? It's not a word that I came across in professional life, and has no place in a scientific context.
This is just more worthless journalist BS.
Terrible
Everyone listening to this needs to watch Tony Hellers videos!
If it were not for global warming humanity would freeze to death in the next ice age.
Greenwashing !
Once he's done speaking he drives off in a car, then takes a plane
Be afraid !! Be very very afraid !!
Nah... i am.not. i am.not afraid of fairy tales. Its all climate alarmist nonsense. The planet will be fine. No need to fear a non-existing problem
When the great messiah of the left Barack Obama won the democratic presidential nomination in 2008 he proclaimed "it was the moment the rising oceans began to fall and our planet began to heal"
On leaving office eight years later he was obviously convinced his earlier proclamation had come to pass because he splashed out fifteen million dollars on a beachfront villa on the low level island of Martha's Vineyard.
Which is well above sea level. 10ft or something? He'd have to live to be 250 years old for there to be issue, what's your point?
@JFB1111 The position of Obama's mansion on the island is approximately 6 to 7ft above sea level, which happens to be the same as the Maldives, which, according to Obama and our other lying trillionaire ruling elites, should have been under water more than thirty years ago. Which, by the way, is receiving record investment in its infrastructure!
A lot of B.S. in this video!
i bet ur a conservative. No BS and things are much graver than he stated. Eliminate ff subsidies
My god - How do "journalists" get away with these lies?
@@goosergone143
7 months old account that primarily responds to political comments
Its a troll, they know full well that what he spoke about is the truth, that or they are too far gone that they have had their accounts banned for spreading misinformation
Point is that he knows this isn't a lie, or he'll never be able to see it as anything else because it wasn't endorsed by Trump
@@goosergone143 the great man.made global warming hoax. Lies to make you give up your freedoms for a totalitarian world government under the guise of saving the planet.
Lol ok.