क्या रहा सुप्रीम कोर्ट का @PhysicsWallah को लेकर प्रतिक्रिया ?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 16 июн 2024
- In this video, We are raising a serious question following the oral remarks made by the honorable justice on Physics Wallah during the SC hearing when NTA withdrew ‘grace marks’ awarded to 1,563 NEET candidates.
During the arguments, advocate J Sai Deepak stated, “We have candidates who also suffered time loss but were not awarded grace marks as they were not able to reach any court, unlike those who reached high courts and were awarded grace marks.”
The honorable justice then asked, “Where do you have candidates? Who are you, Physics Wallah? You run your own coaching center and you are worried about yourself. What is this?”
This exchange highlights the importance of having an affected student/s as a party to make a more significant impact.
Was it necessary for a coaching institute owner to be a party to the case? Shouldn't they have supported the students in the litigation instead?
We discovered a shorts video on one of the official channels of Physics Wallah in which it is being projected that the entire movement is being run by a single individual. lnkd.in/gzx6Jexh
We emailed PW to remove this video as it is highly objectionable and gives the entire credit to just one individual. However, it has not been removed yet.
This credit war raises serious questions about why it was framed as "Alakh Pandey vs NTA."
We are raising tough questions: Shouldn't the coaching industry, instead of becoming a party to the case and creating headlines like "Alakh Pandey vs NTA," have made the affected students the party?
The case could have been titled "Student Name (who was/were not awarded grace marks despite time loss as they were not able to reach any court) vs NTA."
Here is the link to the Supreme Court hearing video : lnkd.in/gQPrYHur
Join us as we discuss the implications of this case on the education system, why student representation is crucial in legal battles against NTA NEET EXAM, and how entities like Physics Wallah could better support students without overshadowing their voices in crucial legal matters.
Copyright Disclaimer: - Under section 107 of the copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for FAIR USE for purpose such a as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statues that might otherwise be infringing. Non- Profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of FAIR USE.
Don't forget to like, subscribe, and share your thoughts on this important issue affecting students nationwide. Let's ensure that educational policies are crafted with the best interests of students at heart.
@aajtak @abp_live @ABPNEWS @zeenews @IndiaTV @ndtvindia @NDTV @RepublicTVBharat
We are salute Physics Wala
आजाद भारत में गुरु शिष्य परंपरा का ये एक्साम्प्ल हैं. जय हिंद
Is bande ne apne fayde k liye itne sare bacchon ki watt laga di aur emotions ka gana gata firta h ye log teacher k naam pe dabba h
Physics Wala ne toh students ki aawaj uthaai hai
Any citizen can raise an issue that largely affects a significant section of youth of the nation. I believe Mr Pandey has very genuinely raised the issue. He has no personal interest in this. In anu case it is not so easy for an average person to hire an SC lawyer and file a petition. Unfortunately that is not the point. Somewhere all along the actual point was not discussed even though it was very obvious.
The point we are trying to highlight is that if they claimed to have 20k affected students (as mentioned in many RUclips videos), students could have been made party to the case, and PW could have supported them with resources. This would have enabled answering the question posed by the honorable justice. Representation of the victims could have made a significant difference, especially since the image of coaching institutions is not very positive in Indian society, a sentiment that was clearly evident during the argument.
नहीं